metal-organic compounds
Bis[μ-N-(pyridin-2-yl)methanesulfonamido-κ2N:N′]silver(I)
aDepartment of Hospitality Management, Taoyuan Innovation Institute of Technology, Jhongli 32091, Taiwan, and bDepartment of Chemistry, Chung-Yuan Christian University, Jhongli 32023, Taiwan
*Correspondence e-mail: cwyeh@cycu.org.tw
In the title compound, [Ag2(C6H7N2O2S)2], the AgI atom is coordinated by two N atoms from two N-(pyridin-2-yl)methanesulfonamidate anions in a slightly bent linear geometry [N—Ag—N = 166.03 (7)°]. The AgI atoms are bridged by the N-(pyridin-2-yl)methanesulfonamidate anions, forming a centrosymmetric dinuclear molecule, in which the Ag⋯Ag distance is 2.7072 (4) Å.
CCDC reference: 973127
Related literature
For related di(pyridyl/pyrimidyl)amide structures, see: Hu et al. (2004); Hsu et al. (2008); Yeh et al. (2008); Tsai et al. (2010). For related methyl-4-(pyridin-pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamoyl)benzoate structures, see: Wu et al. (2011); Hsiao et al. (2012). For related phosphinic amide structures, see: Yeh & Chen (2011); Yeh et al. (2012).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2010); cell SAINT (Bruker, 2010); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 973127
10.1107/S1600536813031814/xu5753sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, New_Global_Publ_Block. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813031814/xu5753Isup2.hkl
An aqueous solution (5.0 ml) of AgNO3 (1.0 mmol) was layered carefully over a methanolic solution (5.0 ml) of N-(pyridin-2-yl)methansulfonamide (1.0 mmol) in a tube and kept it in the dark. Colourless crystals were obtained after several weeks. These were washed with methanol and collected in 78.6% yield.
H atoms were placed in idealized positions and constrained to ride on their parent atoms with C—H = 0.93 or 0.96 Å, Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C) for methyl H atoms and 1.2Ueq(C) for the others.
A series of complexes with the symmetric di(pyridyl/pyrimidyl)amide ligands (Hu et al., 2004; Hsu et al., 2008; Yeh et al., 2008; Tsai et al., 2010) and the asymmetric methyl-4-(pyridin-/pyrimidin-2-ylcarbamoyl)benzoate (Wu et al., 2011; Hsiao et al., 2012) or phosphinic amide (Yeh & Chen, 2011; Yeh et al., 2012) ligands that exhibit interesting structural types have been synthesized and structurally characterized. These pyridyl/pyrimidyl amide ligands coordinate to the metal centers through their pyridyl/pyrimidyl nitrogen atoms and/or amide oxygen atoms and interact with each other through hydrogen bonds involving the amide groups. These interactions are important for molecular recognition and constructing supramolecular arrays. .
In the title compound, [Ag(C6H7N2SO2)]2, the Ag+ cations are coordinated with one pyridyl N and one amido N atoms from twoN-(pyridin-2-yl)methanesulfonamido (L-) anions forming a slightly bent geometry (Fig. 1). The Ag···Ag distance separated by the bridging L- group is 2.7072 (4) Å.
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2010); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2010); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2010); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).Fig. 1. Crystal structure of the title compound with labeling and displacement ellipsoids drawn at 30% probability level. [Symmetry codes: (i) -x,-y + 1,-z + 1.] |
[Ag2(C6H7N2O2S)2] | F(000) = 544 |
Mr = 558.13 | Dx = 2.323 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 6474 reflections |
a = 6.4406 (2) Å | θ = 2.6–35.3° |
b = 15.4580 (5) Å | µ = 2.74 mm−1 |
c = 8.0789 (2) Å | T = 296 K |
β = 97.143 (2)° | Column, colourless |
V = 798.08 (4) Å3 | 0.20 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm |
Z = 2 |
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer | 3569 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 2732 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.048 |
phi and ω scans | θmax = 35.4°, θmin = 2.6° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000) | h = −10→8 |
Tmin = 0.636, Tmax = 0.747 | k = −25→22 |
12917 measured reflections | l = −13→11 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.092 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.05 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0368P)2 + 0.3136P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
3569 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
110 parameters | Δρmax = 1.32 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −1.22 e Å−3 |
[Ag2(C6H7N2O2S)2] | V = 798.08 (4) Å3 |
Mr = 558.13 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 6.4406 (2) Å | µ = 2.74 mm−1 |
b = 15.4580 (5) Å | T = 296 K |
c = 8.0789 (2) Å | 0.20 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm |
β = 97.143 (2)° |
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer | 3569 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000) | 2732 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.636, Tmax = 0.747 | Rint = 0.048 |
12917 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.092 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.05 | Δρmax = 1.32 e Å−3 |
3569 reflections | Δρmin = −1.22 e Å−3 |
110 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Ag | 0.13566 (3) | 0.475803 (15) | 0.63351 (2) | 0.03999 (8) | |
S | 0.07511 (10) | 0.64837 (4) | 0.14689 (7) | 0.02803 (12) | |
C1 | 0.5244 (4) | 0.58574 (16) | 0.6741 (3) | 0.0306 (4) | |
H1A | 0.5410 | 0.5553 | 0.7742 | 0.037* | |
C2 | 0.6811 (4) | 0.64120 (18) | 0.6425 (3) | 0.0354 (5) | |
H2A | 0.8011 | 0.6483 | 0.7181 | 0.043* | |
C3 | 0.6530 (4) | 0.68622 (16) | 0.4931 (3) | 0.0357 (5) | |
H3A | 0.7560 | 0.7241 | 0.4664 | 0.043* | |
C4 | 0.4738 (4) | 0.67511 (16) | 0.3846 (3) | 0.0318 (5) | |
H4A | 0.4547 | 0.7060 | 0.2851 | 0.038* | |
C5 | 0.3186 (3) | 0.61698 (14) | 0.4237 (3) | 0.0245 (4) | |
C6 | 0.2438 (5) | 0.6112 (2) | 0.0057 (3) | 0.0422 (6) | |
H6A | 0.2090 | 0.6393 | −0.1001 | 0.063* | |
H6B | 0.2281 | 0.5498 | −0.0083 | 0.063* | |
H6C | 0.3860 | 0.6243 | 0.0487 | 0.063* | |
N1 | 0.3482 (3) | 0.57273 (12) | 0.5690 (2) | 0.0255 (3) | |
N2 | 0.1362 (3) | 0.59867 (13) | 0.3207 (2) | 0.0274 (4) | |
O1 | −0.1324 (3) | 0.61682 (13) | 0.0849 (2) | 0.0406 (4) | |
O2 | 0.1003 (3) | 0.74049 (12) | 0.1604 (3) | 0.0402 (4) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Ag | 0.03197 (12) | 0.05057 (14) | 0.03650 (11) | −0.01463 (8) | 0.00059 (8) | 0.01295 (8) |
S | 0.0278 (3) | 0.0277 (3) | 0.0283 (3) | 0.0004 (2) | 0.00232 (19) | 0.00570 (19) |
C1 | 0.0274 (11) | 0.0352 (12) | 0.0286 (10) | −0.0003 (9) | 0.0011 (8) | −0.0004 (8) |
C2 | 0.0271 (12) | 0.0397 (13) | 0.0381 (13) | −0.0043 (10) | −0.0016 (9) | −0.0069 (10) |
C3 | 0.0319 (12) | 0.0328 (11) | 0.0426 (13) | −0.0105 (10) | 0.0054 (10) | −0.0031 (10) |
C4 | 0.0300 (12) | 0.0317 (11) | 0.0337 (11) | −0.0076 (9) | 0.0040 (9) | 0.0033 (9) |
C5 | 0.0227 (10) | 0.0246 (9) | 0.0267 (9) | −0.0013 (7) | 0.0047 (7) | −0.0011 (7) |
C6 | 0.0492 (17) | 0.0462 (15) | 0.0330 (12) | −0.0013 (12) | 0.0125 (11) | −0.0002 (10) |
N1 | 0.0251 (9) | 0.0272 (9) | 0.0245 (8) | −0.0005 (7) | 0.0041 (6) | 0.0009 (6) |
N2 | 0.0242 (9) | 0.0306 (9) | 0.0272 (8) | −0.0035 (7) | 0.0017 (7) | 0.0060 (7) |
O1 | 0.0325 (10) | 0.0472 (11) | 0.0388 (10) | −0.0050 (8) | −0.0082 (8) | 0.0109 (8) |
O2 | 0.0416 (11) | 0.0275 (8) | 0.0506 (11) | 0.0033 (7) | 0.0028 (9) | 0.0078 (7) |
Ag—N1 | 2.1373 (19) | C2—H2A | 0.9300 |
Ag—N2i | 2.1654 (19) | C3—C4 | 1.370 (4) |
Ag—Agi | 2.7072 (4) | C3—H3A | 0.9300 |
S—O2 | 1.4359 (19) | C4—C5 | 1.409 (3) |
S—O1 | 1.452 (2) | C4—H4A | 0.9300 |
S—N2 | 1.6061 (19) | C5—N1 | 1.351 (3) |
S—C6 | 1.766 (3) | C5—N2 | 1.382 (3) |
C1—N1 | 1.345 (3) | C6—H6A | 0.9600 |
C1—C2 | 1.372 (4) | C6—H6B | 0.9600 |
C1—H1A | 0.9300 | C6—H6C | 0.9600 |
C2—C3 | 1.385 (4) | N2—Agi | 2.1654 (19) |
N1—Ag—N2i | 166.03 (7) | C3—C4—C5 | 120.1 (2) |
N1—Ag—Agi | 88.95 (5) | C3—C4—H4A | 120.0 |
N2i—Ag—Agi | 80.07 (5) | C5—C4—H4A | 120.0 |
O2—S—O1 | 116.73 (12) | N1—C5—N2 | 115.93 (19) |
O2—S—N2 | 113.24 (11) | N1—C5—C4 | 119.3 (2) |
O1—S—N2 | 104.81 (11) | N2—C5—C4 | 124.7 (2) |
O2—S—C6 | 107.40 (13) | S—C6—H6A | 109.5 |
O1—S—C6 | 106.38 (14) | S—C6—H6B | 109.5 |
N2—S—C6 | 107.79 (13) | H6A—C6—H6B | 109.5 |
N1—C1—C2 | 123.9 (2) | S—C6—H6C | 109.5 |
N1—C1—H1A | 118.0 | H6A—C6—H6C | 109.5 |
C2—C1—H1A | 118.0 | H6B—C6—H6C | 109.5 |
C1—C2—C3 | 117.2 (2) | C1—N1—C5 | 119.3 (2) |
C1—C2—H2A | 121.4 | C1—N1—Ag | 117.82 (15) |
C3—C2—H2A | 121.4 | C5—N1—Ag | 122.74 (15) |
C4—C3—C2 | 120.2 (2) | C5—N2—S | 121.75 (15) |
C4—C3—H3A | 119.9 | C5—N2—Agi | 130.60 (14) |
C2—C3—H3A | 119.9 | S—N2—Agi | 106.75 (10) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y+1, −z+1. |
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Taoyuan Innovation Institute of Technology and the National Science Council of Taiwan for support.
References
Brandenburg, K. (1999). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Bruker (2000). SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Bruker (2010). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Hsiao, H.-L., Wu, C.-J., Hsu, W., Yeh, C.-W., Xie, M.-Y., Huang, W.-J. & Chen, J.-D. (2012). CrystEngComm, 14, 8143–8152. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hsu, Y.-F., Lin, C.-H., Chen, J.-D. & Wang, J.-C. (2008). Cryst. Growth Des. 8, 1094–1096. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hu, H.-L., Yeh, C.-W. & Chen, J.-D. (2004). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 4696–4701. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Tsai, T.-P., Huang, Y.-T., Ray, U., Chang, Y.-J., Cheng, P.-C., Wu, C.-J., Chen, J.-D. & Wang, J.-C. (2010). Polyhedron, 29, 3081–3088. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wu, C.-J., Sie, M.-J., Hsiao, H.-L. & Chen, J.-D. (2011). CrystEngComm, 13, 4121–4130. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Yeh, C.-W., Chang, K.-H., Hu, C.-Y., Hsu, W. & Chen, J.-D. (2012). Polyhedron, 31, 657–664. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Yeh, C.-W. & Chen, J.-D. (2011). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 14, 1212–1216. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Yeh, C.-W., Chen, J.-D. & Wang, J.-C. (2008). Polyhedron, 27, 3611–3618. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.