organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 70| Part 2| February 2014| Pages o166-o167

Adenin-1-ium hydrogen isophthalate di­methyl­formamide monosolvate

aDepartment of Chemistry, Youngstown State University, One University, Plaza, Youngstown, OH 44555, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: srlovelacecameron@ysu.edu

(Received 20 December 2013; accepted 30 December 2013; online 18 January 2014)

In the title proton-transfer organic salt, C5H6.3N5+·C8H4.7O4·C3H7NO, the adeninium moiety is protonated at the N atom in the 1-position of the 6-amino-7H-purin-1-ium (adeninium) cation. In the solid state, the second acidic proton of isophthalic acid is partially transferred to the imidazole N atom of the adeninium cation [refined O—H versus N—H ratio = 0.70 (11):0.30 (11)]. Through the partially transferred proton, the adeninium cation is strongly hydrogen bonded (N—H⋯O/O—H⋯N) to the isophthalate anion. This strong inter­action is assisted by another N—H⋯O hydrogen bond originating from the adeninium NH2 group towards the isophthalate keto O atom, with an R22(8) graph-set motif. This arrangement is linked via N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds to the O atoms of the carboxyl­ate group of an isophthalate anion. Together, these hydrogen bonds lead to the formation criss-cross zigzag isophthalate⋯adeninium chains lying parallel to (501) and (50-1). The adeninium cations and the isophthalate anions are arranged in infinite π stacks that extend along the c-axis direction [inter­planar distance = 3.305 (3) Å]. Mol­ecules are inclined with respect to this direction and within the stacks they are offset by ca. half a mol­ecule each. Combination of the N—H⋯O and O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds with the ππ inter­actions forms infinitely stacked isophthalate⋯adeninium chains, thus leading to a two-dimensional supra­molecular structure with parallel inter­digitating layers formed by the π stacked isophthalate⋯adeninium chains. The DMF mol­ecules of crystallization are bonded to the adeninium cations through strong N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and project into the lattice space in between the anions and cations. There are also C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds present which, combined with the other inter­actions, form a three-dimensional network. The crystal under investigation was found to be split and was handled as if non-merohedrally twinned.

Related literature

For supra­molecular structures comprising 3-carb­oxy­benzo­ates, see, for example: Siddiqui et al. (2012[Siddiqui, T., Koteswara Rao, V., Zeller, M. & Lovelace-Cameron, S. R. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o1778.]). For adenine as a linker and biomolecular building block, see: An et al. (2010[An, J., Geib, S. J. & Rosi, N. L. (2010). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 38-39.]). For hydrogen bonding, see: Gilli & Gilli (2009[Gilli, G. & Gilli, P. (2009). The Nature of the Hydrogen Bond. Outline of a Comprehensive Hydrogen Bond Theory. International Union of Crystallography Monographs on Crystallography 23. Oxford University Press.]). For graph-set analysis, see: Etter (1990[Etter, M. C. (1990). Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 120-126.]); Bernstein et al. (1995[Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555-1573.])·The crystal under investigation was found to be split and was handled as if non-merohedrally twinned. The orientation matrices for the two components were identified using the program CELL NOW (Sheldrick, 2004[Sheldrick, G. M. (2004). CELL NOW. University of Göttingen, Germany.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C5H6.30N5+·C8H4.70O4·C3H7NO

  • Mr = 374.36

  • Orthorhombic, F d d 2

  • a = 38.307 (18) Å

  • b = 46.05 (2) Å

  • c = 3.7832 (18) Å

  • V = 6674 (5) Å3

  • Z = 16

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.11 mm−1

  • T = 100 K

  • 0.55 × 0.15 × 0.04 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (TWINABS; Bruker, 2009[Bruker (2009). TWINABS. Bruker AXS Inc, Madison, WI, USA.]) Tmin = 0.730, Tmax = 1.000

  • 3888 measured reflections

  • 3888 independent reflections

  • 2703 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.088

  • wR(F2) = 0.233

  • S = 1.05

  • 3888 reflections

  • 251 parameters

  • 2 restraints

  • H atoms treated my a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.58 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.50 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯N4 0.84 (2) 1.77 (4) 2.599 (6) 170 (16)
N4—H4A⋯O2 0.88 1.75 2.599 (6) 160
N5—H5B⋯O1 0.88 2.05 2.913 (7) 168
N1—H1⋯O4i 0.88 1.73 2.601 (6) 168
N5—H5A⋯O3i 0.88 2.07 2.933 (7) 166
N3—H3A⋯O5ii 0.88 1.84 2.700 (7) 166
C12—H12⋯O5iii 0.95 2.27 3.196 (7) 165
C16—H16C⋯O1iv 0.98 2.63 3.290 (8) 125
Symmetry codes: (i) [x+{\script{1\over 4}}, -y+{\script{1\over 4}}, z+{\script{5\over 4}}]; (ii) [-x+{\script{1\over 4}}, y-{\script{1\over 4}}, z-{\script{1\over 4}}]; (iii) [x-{\script{1\over 4}}, -y+{\script{1\over 4}}, z-{\script{1\over 4}}]; (iv) x, y, z-1.

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2011[Bruker (2011). APEX2 and SAINT, Bruker AXS Inc, Madison, WI, USA.]); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2011[Bruker (2011). APEX2 and SAINT, Bruker AXS Inc, Madison, WI, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2013 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]) and SHELXLE (Hübschle et al., 2011[Hübschle, C. B., Sheldrick, G. M. & Dittrich, B. (2011). J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 1281-1284.]); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008[Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466-470.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL2013 and publCIF (Westrip, 2010[Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.]).

Supporting information


Comment top

The title compound was obtained as a result of our studies on magnesium based metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) using solvothermal synthesis. In order to examine the interaction between metal salts and various organic ligands as linkers for possible formation of MOFs, we have extensively tested bis- and tris-carboxylic acid linkers such as isophthalic acid, cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid, and trimesic acid, but also nitrogen based ligands derived from DNA bases such as adenine, which was recently reported as a particularly effective linker and biomolecular building block (An et al., 2010) due to its rigidity and potential multiple coordination modes. We are currently interested in the synthesis of MOFs with Mg, isophthalate and adenine. Reaction of magnesium nitrate with isophthalic acid and adenine at 423 K did, however, not yield the desired extended framework. The presence of multiple Lewis basic sites (amino group) in adenine led to the formation of colourless plate like crystals of the title compound as a minor product along with a sand-like precipitate of Mg formate dihydrate, Mg(HCOO)2·2H2O.

The asymmetric unit of the title proton-transfer organic salt consists of one adeninium monocation, one isophthalate monoanion, and one molecule of dimethylformamide (DMF) [Fig. 1]. The adeninium moiety is protonated at the nitrogen in the 1-position of the 6-amino-7H-purin-1-ium (adeninium) cation. In the solid state the second acidic proton of isophthalic acid, H2, is partially transferred to the imidazole nitrogen (N4) of the adeninium cation[(refined O—H versus N—H ratio = 0.70 (11):0.30 (11)]. Through the partially transferred proton the adeninium cation is strongly hydrogen bonded to the isophthalate anion (Gilli et al., 2009). This strong interaction is assisted by another N—H···O hydrogen bond originating from the adeninium NH2 group towards the isophthalate keto oxygen atom, O1, forming an R22(8) graph set motif (Etter, 1990; Bernstein et al., 1995). This arrangement is linked via N-H···O hydrogen bonds to the O atoms of the carboxylate group of the isophthalate anion. Combined these hydrogen bonds lead to the formation of one-dimensional zigzag isophthalate···adeninium chains that lie parallel to planes (501) and (50-1). The various hydrogen bonds are given in Table 1.

Mono-deprotonated isophthalate anions have also been observed in other related compounds, such as for dimethylammonium 3-carboxybenzoate (Siddiqui et al., 2012). In that structure the isophthalate monoanions are hydrogen bonded with neighbouring isophthalates as well as dimethylammonium cations resulting in the formation of a double-chain-like structure. In the title compound, the isophthalate monoanions are hydrogen-bonded with adeninium cations which leads to the formation of one-dimensional undulated isophthalate···adeninium chains. The adeninium cations and the isophthalate monoanions, from the zigzag chains, are in turn arranged in infinite π stacks that extend along the direction of the c axis [interplanar distances 3.305 (3) Å]. Molecules are inclined with respect to this direction and within the stacks they are offset by ca. half a molecule each, 1.736 (3) Å for the isophthalate anions and 1.827 (3) Å for the adeninium cations. The average centroid-centroid distances are thus substantially larger than the interplanar distances; 3.783 (4) Å for both the adeninium cations and the isophthalate anions. For the isophthalate anions, π-π stacking is thus mostly between the phenyl ring of one molecule and the carboxylate group of another. In the adeninium cations π-π stacking interactions are between the centers of the pyrimidine and imidazole rings.

Combination of the N—H···O and O—H···N hydrogen bonds with the π-π interactions forms infinitely stacked isophthalate···adeninium chains (Table 1 and Fig. 2), thus leading to a two-dimensional supramolecular structure with parallel interdigitating layers formed by the π stacked isophthalate···adeninium chains (Fig. 3). The DMF molecules are bonded to the adeninium cation through strong N—H···O hydrogen bonds and are projecting into the lattice space in between the anions and cations (Table 1). There are also C-H···O hydrogen bonds present (Table 1) which together with the other interactions form a three-dimensional network.

Related literature top

For supramolecular structures comprising 3-carboxybenzoates, see, for example: Siddiqui et al. (2012). For adenine as a linker and biomolecular building block, see: An et al. (2010). For hydrogen bonding, see: Gilli & Gilli (2009). For graph-set analysis, see: Etter (1990); Bernstein et al. (1995).The crystal under investigation was found to be split and was handled as if non-merohedrally twinned. The orientation matrices for the two components were identified using the program CELL NOW (Sheldrick, 2004).

Experimental top

The compound was synthesized under solvothermal conditions. In a typical synthesis, Mg(NO3)2·6H2O (0.128 g, 0.5 mmol) and adenine (0.068 g, 0.5 mmol) were dissolved in DMF (10.0 ml). Then isophthalic acid (0.166 g, 0.5 mmol) was added to the reaction mixture under continuous stirring. The mixture was stirred for 30 minutes before transferring the mixture into a 23 ml teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave. The final mixture, with a composition of 1:1:1, was heated to 423 K for 96 h. The autoclave was then cooled to room temperature, yielding colourless plate-like crystals of the title compound as a minor product, along with a sand like precipitate of Mg formate dihydrate, Mg(HCOO)2·2(H2O), (ICSD #151330).

Refinement top

The crystal under investigation was found to be split and was handled as if non-merohedrally twinned. The orientation matrices for the two components were identified using the program Cell Now (Sheldrick, 2004), which reports the second moiety to be related to the first by a 2.8 degree rotation around either the reciprocal a-axis, or around the real axis 1 0 - 0.6. The two components were integrated using Saint, resulting in a total of 22391 reflections. 6713 reflections (1732 unique) involved component 1 only (mean I/σ = 3.8), 6662 reflections (1736 unique) involved component 2 only (mean I/σ = 2.5), and 9016 reflections (3181 unique) involved both components (mean I/σ = 5.2). The exact twin matrix identified by the integration program was found to be -1.00000 - 0.00215 - 0.00999, -0.00315 0.99902 0.53675, 0.00009 0.00362 - 0.99903.

The data were corrected for absorption using TWINABS (Bruker, 2009), and the structure was solved using direct methods with only the non-overlapping reflections of component 1. The structure was refined using the hklf 5 routine with all reflections of component 1 (including the overlapping ones), resulting in a BASF value of 0.317 (5). In the absence of significant anomalous scatterers Friedel pairs were merged during correction for absorption effects with TWINABS.

The Rint value given is for all reflections and is based on agreement between observed single and composite intensities and those calculated from refined unique intensities and twin fractions (TWINABS; Bruker, 2009).

Hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions with C—H = 0.95 Å (aromatic H), 0.99 Å (methyl H) or 0.88 Å (N—H). Methyl group H atoms were allowed to rotate freely around the C—C bond to best fit the experimental electron density. Carboxylic acid hydrogen atoms were located in difference electron density maps, but were placed in calculated positions with fixed C—O—H angles, but with the C—C—O—H dihedral angles and the O—H distances refined with the constraint AFIX 148 (Sheldrick, 2008). Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C/O) for methyl and carboxylic acid H atoms, and = 1.2Ueq(C/N) for aromatic and adenine H-atoms. One of the acidic hydrogen atoms was refined as disordered over a carboxylate versus a nitrogen bound site. The occupancy rate for the major O-bound site refined to 0.70 (9).

Structure description top

The title compound was obtained as a result of our studies on magnesium based metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) using solvothermal synthesis. In order to examine the interaction between metal salts and various organic ligands as linkers for possible formation of MOFs, we have extensively tested bis- and tris-carboxylic acid linkers such as isophthalic acid, cyclohexane dicarboxylic acid, and trimesic acid, but also nitrogen based ligands derived from DNA bases such as adenine, which was recently reported as a particularly effective linker and biomolecular building block (An et al., 2010) due to its rigidity and potential multiple coordination modes. We are currently interested in the synthesis of MOFs with Mg, isophthalate and adenine. Reaction of magnesium nitrate with isophthalic acid and adenine at 423 K did, however, not yield the desired extended framework. The presence of multiple Lewis basic sites (amino group) in adenine led to the formation of colourless plate like crystals of the title compound as a minor product along with a sand-like precipitate of Mg formate dihydrate, Mg(HCOO)2·2H2O.

The asymmetric unit of the title proton-transfer organic salt consists of one adeninium monocation, one isophthalate monoanion, and one molecule of dimethylformamide (DMF) [Fig. 1]. The adeninium moiety is protonated at the nitrogen in the 1-position of the 6-amino-7H-purin-1-ium (adeninium) cation. In the solid state the second acidic proton of isophthalic acid, H2, is partially transferred to the imidazole nitrogen (N4) of the adeninium cation[(refined O—H versus N—H ratio = 0.70 (11):0.30 (11)]. Through the partially transferred proton the adeninium cation is strongly hydrogen bonded to the isophthalate anion (Gilli et al., 2009). This strong interaction is assisted by another N—H···O hydrogen bond originating from the adeninium NH2 group towards the isophthalate keto oxygen atom, O1, forming an R22(8) graph set motif (Etter, 1990; Bernstein et al., 1995). This arrangement is linked via N-H···O hydrogen bonds to the O atoms of the carboxylate group of the isophthalate anion. Combined these hydrogen bonds lead to the formation of one-dimensional zigzag isophthalate···adeninium chains that lie parallel to planes (501) and (50-1). The various hydrogen bonds are given in Table 1.

Mono-deprotonated isophthalate anions have also been observed in other related compounds, such as for dimethylammonium 3-carboxybenzoate (Siddiqui et al., 2012). In that structure the isophthalate monoanions are hydrogen bonded with neighbouring isophthalates as well as dimethylammonium cations resulting in the formation of a double-chain-like structure. In the title compound, the isophthalate monoanions are hydrogen-bonded with adeninium cations which leads to the formation of one-dimensional undulated isophthalate···adeninium chains. The adeninium cations and the isophthalate monoanions, from the zigzag chains, are in turn arranged in infinite π stacks that extend along the direction of the c axis [interplanar distances 3.305 (3) Å]. Molecules are inclined with respect to this direction and within the stacks they are offset by ca. half a molecule each, 1.736 (3) Å for the isophthalate anions and 1.827 (3) Å for the adeninium cations. The average centroid-centroid distances are thus substantially larger than the interplanar distances; 3.783 (4) Å for both the adeninium cations and the isophthalate anions. For the isophthalate anions, π-π stacking is thus mostly between the phenyl ring of one molecule and the carboxylate group of another. In the adeninium cations π-π stacking interactions are between the centers of the pyrimidine and imidazole rings.

Combination of the N—H···O and O—H···N hydrogen bonds with the π-π interactions forms infinitely stacked isophthalate···adeninium chains (Table 1 and Fig. 2), thus leading to a two-dimensional supramolecular structure with parallel interdigitating layers formed by the π stacked isophthalate···adeninium chains (Fig. 3). The DMF molecules are bonded to the adeninium cation through strong N—H···O hydrogen bonds and are projecting into the lattice space in between the anions and cations (Table 1). There are also C-H···O hydrogen bonds present (Table 1) which together with the other interactions form a three-dimensional network.

For supramolecular structures comprising 3-carboxybenzoates, see, for example: Siddiqui et al. (2012). For adenine as a linker and biomolecular building block, see: An et al. (2010). For hydrogen bonding, see: Gilli & Gilli (2009). For graph-set analysis, see: Etter (1990); Bernstein et al. (1995).The crystal under investigation was found to be split and was handled as if non-merohedrally twinned. The orientation matrices for the two components were identified using the program CELL NOW (Sheldrick, 2004).

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2011); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2011); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2011); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2013 (Sheldrick, 2008) and SHELXLE (Hübschle et al., 2011); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL2013 (Sheldrick, 2008) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. View of the title organic compound, with atom labelling. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Green dots represent the partially transferred proton to atom N4.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. View of one of the one-dimensional undulating chains lying parallel to (501) in the crystal packing of the title compound. Hydrogen bonds are shown as green dashed lines (see Table 1 for details; the minor occupied hydrogen atoms, H4A, have been omitted for clarity).
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. View of the π-stacked chains in the crystal of the title compound. Pink spheres represent centroids of isophthalate benzene rings and adeninium cations; blue planes are weighted averages of each two adeninium and isophthalate ions as displayed. The green dotted lines represent centroid-centroid and interplanar distances. The minor occupied hydrogen atoms, H4A, and the DMF molecules have been omitted for clarity.
Adenin-1-ium hydrogen isophthalate dimethylformamide monosolvate top
Crystal data top
C5H6.30N5+·C8H4.70O4·C3H7NODx = 1.490 Mg m3
Mr = 374.36Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, Fdd2Cell parameters from 290 reflections
a = 38.307 (18) Åθ = 4.3–30.4°
b = 46.05 (2) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
c = 3.7832 (18) ÅT = 100 K
V = 6674 (5) Å3Plate, colourless
Z = 160.55 × 0.15 × 0.04 mm
F(000) = 3136
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEX CCD
diffractometer
3888 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2703 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorθmax = 30.6°, θmin = 1.4°
ω scansh = 054
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(TWINABS; Bruker, 2009)
k = 066
Tmin = 0.730, Tmax = 1.000l = 05
3888 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.088Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F2) = 0.233H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0928P)2 + 48.0632P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3888 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
251 parametersΔρmax = 0.58 e Å3
2 restraintsΔρmin = 0.50 e Å3
Crystal data top
C5H6.30N5+·C8H4.70O4·C3H7NOV = 6674 (5) Å3
Mr = 374.36Z = 16
Orthorhombic, Fdd2Mo Kα radiation
a = 38.307 (18) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
b = 46.05 (2) ÅT = 100 K
c = 3.7832 (18) Å0.55 × 0.15 × 0.04 mm
Data collection top
Bruker SMART APEX CCD
diffractometer
3888 measured reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(TWINABS; Bruker, 2009)
3888 independent reflections
Tmin = 0.730, Tmax = 1.0002703 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0882 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.233H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0928P)2 + 48.0632P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3888 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.58 e Å3
251 parametersΔρmin = 0.50 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refined as a 2-component twin.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
C10.05925 (14)0.13091 (12)0.512 (2)0.0190 (13)
C20.04322 (13)0.15984 (12)0.4520 (16)0.0123 (11)
C30.06001 (14)0.18481 (13)0.566 (2)0.0194 (13)
H30.08220.18340.67670.023*
C40.04487 (14)0.21170 (12)0.5214 (17)0.0156 (11)
H40.05640.22870.60400.019*
C50.01246 (13)0.21387 (12)0.3538 (18)0.0161 (12)
H50.00190.23230.32050.019*
C60.00425 (13)0.18877 (12)0.2360 (18)0.0144 (11)
C70.01070 (13)0.16197 (12)0.2957 (19)0.0157 (12)
H70.00140.14480.22890.019*
C80.03904 (14)0.19030 (12)0.0547 (19)0.0171 (12)
C90.12077 (13)0.05012 (13)0.7880 (19)0.0175 (12)
C100.13647 (13)0.00114 (14)0.7890 (18)0.0181 (12)
H100.15350.01270.86070.022*
C110.08680 (14)0.01200 (13)0.5326 (19)0.0183 (12)
C120.04224 (15)0.03628 (13)0.335 (2)0.0230 (14)
H120.02060.04040.22330.028*
C130.09038 (13)0.04118 (13)0.604 (2)0.0185 (13)
C140.18697 (14)0.19317 (13)0.289 (2)0.0216 (14)
H140.16570.20080.37820.026*
C150.21815 (16)0.15444 (15)0.010 (2)0.0275 (15)
H15A0.21410.13380.04150.041*
H15B0.23680.15630.18530.041*
H15C0.22500.16450.20790.041*
C160.15440 (17)0.15073 (17)0.128 (3)0.0343 (17)
H16A0.13550.16150.24390.051*
H16B0.15770.13210.24810.051*
H16C0.14830.14730.11980.051*
N10.14293 (12)0.02850 (11)0.8754 (17)0.0188 (11)
H10.16210.03270.99260.023*
N20.10912 (11)0.00944 (11)0.6145 (17)0.0194 (11)
N30.05564 (12)0.00939 (11)0.3618 (16)0.0184 (11)
H3A0.04610.00680.28390.022*
N40.06190 (12)0.05623 (11)0.4781 (17)0.0210 (12)
H4A0.05790.07500.49110.025*0.30 (11)
N50.12746 (11)0.07718 (11)0.8667 (17)0.0195 (11)
H5A0.14680.08170.97950.023*
H5B0.11260.09090.80700.023*
N60.18633 (12)0.16733 (11)0.1475 (19)0.0219 (12)
O10.08756 (10)0.12818 (9)0.6562 (15)0.0227 (10)
O20.04090 (10)0.10943 (9)0.3921 (16)0.0239 (11)
H20.047 (3)0.0918 (8)0.40 (4)0.036*0.70 (11)
O30.05527 (10)0.16840 (9)0.0170 (16)0.0247 (11)
O40.04896 (10)0.21663 (9)0.0238 (14)0.0219 (10)
O50.21343 (10)0.20846 (9)0.3152 (15)0.0233 (10)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.011 (2)0.022 (2)0.024 (4)0.0015 (19)0.005 (3)0.002 (3)
C20.009 (2)0.022 (2)0.006 (3)0.0007 (19)0.002 (2)0.000 (2)
C30.011 (2)0.029 (3)0.019 (3)0.002 (2)0.006 (3)0.000 (3)
C40.014 (2)0.025 (3)0.008 (3)0.006 (2)0.001 (2)0.001 (3)
C50.011 (2)0.023 (3)0.014 (3)0.002 (2)0.000 (2)0.002 (3)
C60.008 (2)0.025 (3)0.011 (3)0.0014 (19)0.002 (2)0.003 (3)
C70.010 (2)0.022 (2)0.016 (3)0.0029 (19)0.001 (2)0.002 (3)
C80.010 (2)0.025 (3)0.016 (3)0.001 (2)0.003 (2)0.001 (3)
C90.011 (2)0.028 (3)0.013 (3)0.001 (2)0.002 (2)0.001 (3)
C100.009 (2)0.036 (3)0.009 (3)0.002 (2)0.006 (2)0.003 (3)
C110.013 (2)0.028 (3)0.014 (3)0.000 (2)0.005 (2)0.001 (3)
C120.015 (2)0.031 (3)0.023 (4)0.003 (2)0.002 (3)0.003 (3)
C130.007 (2)0.028 (3)0.020 (3)0.001 (2)0.001 (2)0.002 (3)
C140.012 (2)0.028 (3)0.025 (4)0.005 (2)0.000 (3)0.003 (3)
C150.024 (3)0.032 (3)0.026 (4)0.010 (2)0.002 (3)0.006 (3)
C160.023 (3)0.050 (4)0.030 (4)0.009 (3)0.001 (3)0.008 (4)
N10.0079 (18)0.031 (2)0.018 (3)0.0006 (18)0.003 (2)0.001 (3)
N20.010 (2)0.029 (2)0.019 (3)0.0032 (18)0.001 (2)0.002 (3)
N30.013 (2)0.028 (2)0.015 (3)0.0002 (18)0.001 (2)0.000 (2)
N40.012 (2)0.025 (2)0.026 (3)0.0035 (18)0.002 (2)0.002 (3)
N50.0090 (19)0.026 (2)0.023 (3)0.0006 (18)0.000 (2)0.001 (3)
N60.015 (2)0.027 (2)0.024 (3)0.0008 (18)0.001 (2)0.001 (3)
O10.0114 (18)0.030 (2)0.027 (3)0.0020 (16)0.0071 (19)0.000 (2)
O20.0124 (17)0.0213 (19)0.038 (3)0.0002 (15)0.008 (2)0.000 (2)
O30.0128 (17)0.025 (2)0.037 (3)0.0015 (15)0.006 (2)0.000 (2)
O40.0119 (17)0.026 (2)0.028 (3)0.0003 (16)0.002 (2)0.000 (2)
O50.0141 (18)0.030 (2)0.025 (3)0.0009 (16)0.002 (2)0.003 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—O11.220 (7)C11—N31.363 (8)
C1—O21.296 (7)C11—C131.378 (8)
C1—C21.485 (7)C12—N41.305 (8)
C2—C71.382 (8)C12—N31.345 (8)
C2—C31.386 (8)C12—H120.9500
C3—C41.378 (8)C13—N41.378 (7)
C3—H30.9500C14—O51.238 (7)
C4—C51.398 (8)C14—N61.305 (8)
C4—H40.9500C14—H140.9500
C5—C61.394 (8)C15—N61.453 (8)
C5—H50.9500C15—H15A0.9800
C6—C71.380 (7)C15—H15B0.9800
C6—C81.501 (8)C15—H15C0.9800
C7—H70.9500C16—N61.444 (8)
C8—O31.215 (7)C16—H16A0.9800
C8—O41.305 (7)C16—H16B0.9800
C9—N51.307 (7)C16—H16C0.9800
C9—N11.349 (7)N1—H10.8800
C9—C131.417 (8)N3—H3A0.8800
C10—N11.325 (8)N4—H4A0.8800
C10—N21.331 (8)N5—H5A0.8800
C10—H100.9500N5—H5B0.8800
C11—N21.342 (7)O2—H20.84 (2)
O1—C1—O2124.1 (5)N4—C13—C11110.1 (5)
O1—C1—C2121.9 (5)N4—C13—C9132.4 (5)
O2—C1—C2114.0 (5)C11—C13—C9117.5 (5)
C7—C2—C3119.5 (5)O5—C14—N6124.5 (6)
C7—C2—C1120.1 (5)O5—C14—H14117.7
C3—C2—C1120.3 (5)N6—C14—H14117.7
C4—C3—C2120.8 (5)N6—C15—H15A109.5
C4—C3—H3119.6N6—C15—H15B109.5
C2—C3—H3119.6H15A—C15—H15B109.5
C3—C4—C5119.6 (5)N6—C15—H15C109.5
C3—C4—H4120.2H15A—C15—H15C109.5
C5—C4—H4120.2H15B—C15—H15C109.5
C6—C5—C4119.6 (5)N6—C16—H16A109.5
C6—C5—H5120.2N6—C16—H16B109.5
C4—C5—H5120.2H16A—C16—H16B109.5
C7—C6—C5119.9 (5)N6—C16—H16C109.5
C7—C6—C8119.1 (5)H16A—C16—H16C109.5
C5—C6—C8121.0 (5)H16B—C16—H16C109.5
C6—C7—C2120.5 (5)C10—N1—C9121.6 (5)
C6—C7—H7119.8C10—N1—H1119.2
C2—C7—H7119.8C9—N1—H1119.2
O3—C8—O4124.9 (6)C10—N2—C11110.3 (5)
O3—C8—C6121.1 (5)C12—N3—C11106.8 (5)
O4—C8—C6114.0 (5)C12—N3—H3A126.6
N5—C9—N1121.6 (5)C11—N3—H3A126.6
N5—C9—C13123.4 (5)C12—N4—C13104.3 (5)
N1—C9—C13115.0 (5)C12—N4—H4A127.9
N1—C10—N2128.1 (6)C13—N4—H4A127.9
N1—C10—H10115.9C9—N5—H5A120.0
N2—C10—H10115.9C9—N5—H5B120.0
N2—C11—N3127.0 (6)H5A—N5—H5B120.0
N2—C11—C13127.5 (6)C14—N6—C16121.3 (6)
N3—C11—C13105.5 (5)C14—N6—C15120.3 (5)
N4—C12—N3113.4 (6)C16—N6—C15118.4 (6)
N4—C12—H12123.3C1—O2—H2126 (8)
N3—C12—H12123.3
O1—C1—C2—C7178.4 (7)N2—C11—C13—C90.6 (11)
O2—C1—C2—C73.1 (9)N3—C11—C13—C9179.1 (6)
O1—C1—C2—C31.4 (10)N5—C9—C13—N41.9 (12)
O2—C1—C2—C3179.9 (6)N1—C9—C13—N4178.6 (7)
C7—C2—C3—C40.9 (10)N5—C9—C13—C11178.9 (6)
C1—C2—C3—C4178.0 (6)N1—C9—C13—C110.5 (9)
C2—C3—C4—C51.0 (10)N2—C10—N1—C90.1 (11)
C3—C4—C5—C60.4 (9)N5—C9—N1—C10178.6 (6)
C4—C5—C6—C72.2 (9)C13—C9—N1—C100.9 (9)
C4—C5—C6—C8179.9 (6)N1—C10—N2—C110.9 (10)
C5—C6—C7—C24.1 (9)N3—C11—N2—C10178.4 (7)
C8—C6—C7—C2177.9 (6)C13—C11—N2—C101.2 (10)
C3—C2—C7—C63.5 (9)N4—C12—N3—C110.7 (8)
C1—C2—C7—C6179.5 (6)N2—C11—N3—C12179.7 (7)
C7—C6—C8—O35.3 (10)C13—C11—N3—C120.5 (7)
C5—C6—C8—O3172.6 (7)N3—C12—N4—C130.6 (8)
C7—C6—C8—O4172.8 (6)C11—C13—N4—C120.2 (8)
C5—C6—C8—O49.3 (9)C9—C13—N4—C12179.4 (8)
N2—C11—C13—N4179.9 (6)O5—C14—N6—C16179.7 (7)
N3—C11—C13—N40.2 (7)O5—C14—N6—C150.6 (11)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···N40.84 (2)1.77 (4)2.599 (6)170 (16)
N4—H4A···O20.881.752.599 (6)160
N5—H5B···O10.882.052.913 (7)168
N1—H1···O4i0.881.732.601 (6)168
N5—H5A···O3i0.882.072.933 (7)166
N3—H3A···O5ii0.881.842.700 (7)166
C12—H12···O5iii0.952.273.196 (7)165
C16—H16C···O1iv0.982.633.290 (8)125
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/4, y+1/4, z+5/4; (ii) x+1/4, y1/4, z1/4; (iii) x1/4, y+1/4, z1/4; (iv) x, y, z1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···N40.84 (2)1.77 (4)2.599 (6)170 (16)
N4—H4A···O20.881.752.599 (6)160
N5—H5B···O10.882.052.913 (7)168
N1—H1···O4i0.881.732.601 (6)168.4
N5—H5A···O3i0.882.072.933 (7)166
N3—H3A···O5ii0.881.842.700 (7)166
C12—H12···O5iii0.952.273.196 (7)164.6
C16—H16C···O1iv0.982.633.290 (8)125
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/4, y+1/4, z+5/4; (ii) x+1/4, y1/4, z1/4; (iii) x1/4, y+1/4, z1/4; (iv) x, y, z1.
 

Acknowledgements

We thank the Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), USA, for financial support. The X-ray diffractometer was funded by National Science Foundation grant 0087210, Ohio Board of Regents grant CAP-491, and by Youngstown State University.

References

First citationAn, J., Geib, S. J. & Rosi, N. L. (2010). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 38–39.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationBernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2009). TWINABS. Bruker AXS Inc, Madison, WI, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2011). APEX2 and SAINT, Bruker AXS Inc, Madison, WI, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationEtter, M. C. (1990). Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 120–126.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationGilli, G. & Gilli, P. (2009). The Nature of the Hydrogen Bond. Outline of a Comprehensive Hydrogen Bond Theory. International Union of Crystallography Monographs on Crystallography 23. Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
First citationHübschle, C. B., Sheldrick, G. M. & Dittrich, B. (2011). J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 1281–1284.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMacrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2004). CELL NOW. University of Göttingen, Germany.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSiddiqui, T., Koteswara Rao, V., Zeller, M. & Lovelace-Cameron, S. R. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, o1778.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 70| Part 2| February 2014| Pages o166-o167
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds