organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

3,4-Di­methyl­phenyl benzoate

aDepartamento de Química - Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad del Valle, Apartado 25360, Santiago de Cali, Colombia, and bWestCHEM, Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, 295 Cathedral Street, Glasgow G1 1XL, Scotland
*Correspondence e-mail: rodimo26@yahoo.es

(Received 16 January 2014; accepted 17 January 2014; online 22 January 2014)

In the title compound, C15H14O2, the terminal rings form a dihedral angle of 52.39 (4)°. The mean plane of the central ester group [r.m.s. deviation = 0.0488 Å] is twisted away from the benzene and phenyl rings by 60.10 (4) and 8.67 (9)°, respectively. In the crystal, mol­ecules are linked by weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming C(6) chains which run along [100].

Related literature

For similar structures, see: Gowda et al. (2008a[Gowda, B. T., Foro, S., Babitha, K. S. & Fuess, H. (2008a). Acta Cryst. E64, o844.],b[Gowda, B. T., Tokarčík, M., Kožíšek, J., Babitha, K. S. & Fuess, H. (2008b). Acta Cryst. E64, o1280.]). For hydrogen-bonding information, see: Nardelli (1995[Nardelli, M. (1995). J. Appl. Cryst. 28, 659.]) and for hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Etter et al. (1990[Etter, M. (1990). Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 120-126.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C15H14O2

  • Mr = 226.26

  • Triclinic, [P \overline 1]

  • a = 6.0293 (4) Å

  • b = 7.8506 (3) Å

  • c = 13.1163 (9) Å

  • α = 88.592 (4)°

  • β = 77.020 (5)°

  • γ = 77.680 (4)°

  • V = 590.87 (6) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.08 mm−1

  • T = 123 K

  • 0.33 × 0.25 × 0.06 mm

Data collection
  • Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur E diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2010[Oxford Diffraction (2010). CrysAlis PRO. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, England.]) Tmin = 0.977, Tmax = 1.000

  • 5782 measured reflections

  • 2965 independent reflections

  • 2196 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.021

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048

  • wR(F2) = 0.112

  • S = 1.04

  • 2965 reflections

  • 156 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.28 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.24 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C2—H2⋯O8i 0.95 2.47 3.3710 (18) 157
Symmetry code: (i) x-1, y, z.

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2010[Oxford Diffraction (2010). CrysAlis PRO. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, England.]); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELX97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012[Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849-854.]) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006[Macrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453-457.]); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 2012[Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849-854.]).

Supporting information


Experimental top

Synthesis and crystallization top

The reagents and solvents for the synthesis were obtained from Aldrich Chemical Co., and were used without additional purification. The title molecule was synthesized using equimolar qu­anti­ties of 3,4-di­methyl­phenol and benzoyl chloride. 3,4-Di­methyl­phenol (0.50 g, 4.10 mmol) was added to a solution of anhydrous aluminum chloride (0.40 g, 3.00 mmol) in anhydrous di­chloro­methane (25 mL). The resulting solution was cooled and benzoyl chloride (0.57 g) was added slowly at 0-5°. After complete addition, the mixture was left under stirring at room temperature for 0.5 h, and then it was heated (reflux) to 50° C for 1 h. The reaction mixture was poured onto ice (100 g). The crude product was isolated by extraction with di­chloro­methane, and it was separated. The solution was dried over Na2SO4 and it was evaporated at room temperature. The obtained amorphous product was dissolved in methanol and the solution was left to slow evaporation. Colourless crystals of good quality were obtained with M.pt = 322 (1) K.

Refinement top

All H-atoms were positioned at geometrically idealized positions with C—H distance of 0.95–0.98 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2–1.5Ueq of the C-atoms to which they were bonded.

Results and discussion top

In order to obtain more detailed information about the effect of substitution of the methyl groups on the structure of benzoate system, the structure determination of 3,4-di­methyl phenyl benzoate (I) has been carried out. Two very similar molecular structures, 2,3-di­methyl­phenyl benzoate, DMPB1 (Gowda et al., 2008a), and 2,4-di­methyl­phenyl benzoate, DMPB2 (Gowda et al., 2008b), were taken for comparison with the structure (I). The rings of (I), Fig. 1, form a dihedral angle of 52.39 (4)° while in DMPB1 and DMPB2 they form dihedral angles of 87.36 (6)° and 80.25 (5)°, respectively. The other bond lengths and bond angles of DMPB1 and DMPB2 are close to the title system. The central ester moiety (C1—O7—C7(O8)—C8) is twisted away from the di­methyl-substituted benzene­and phenyl rings by 60.10 (4) and 8.67 (9)°, respectively. The crystal packing shows no classical hydrogen bonds and it is stabilized by weak C—H···O inter­molecular hydrogen bonds, forming C(6) chains (Etter, 1990) along [100] (see Fig. 2). The C2 atom acts as hydrogen-bond donor to O1 atom at (x-1, +y, +z) (Nardelli, 1995); see Table 1.

Related literature top

For similar structures, see: Gowda et al. (2008a,b). For hydrogen-bonding information, see: Nardelli (1995) and for hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Etter et al. (1990).

Structure description top

In order to obtain more detailed information about the effect of substitution of the methyl groups on the structure of benzoate system, the structure determination of 3,4-di­methyl phenyl benzoate (I) has been carried out. Two very similar molecular structures, 2,3-di­methyl­phenyl benzoate, DMPB1 (Gowda et al., 2008a), and 2,4-di­methyl­phenyl benzoate, DMPB2 (Gowda et al., 2008b), were taken for comparison with the structure (I). The rings of (I), Fig. 1, form a dihedral angle of 52.39 (4)° while in DMPB1 and DMPB2 they form dihedral angles of 87.36 (6)° and 80.25 (5)°, respectively. The other bond lengths and bond angles of DMPB1 and DMPB2 are close to the title system. The central ester moiety (C1—O7—C7(O8)—C8) is twisted away from the di­methyl-substituted benzene­and phenyl rings by 60.10 (4) and 8.67 (9)°, respectively. The crystal packing shows no classical hydrogen bonds and it is stabilized by weak C—H···O inter­molecular hydrogen bonds, forming C(6) chains (Etter, 1990) along [100] (see Fig. 2). The C2 atom acts as hydrogen-bond donor to O1 atom at (x-1, +y, +z) (Nardelli, 1995); see Table 1.

For similar structures, see: Gowda et al. (2008a,b). For hydrogen-bonding information, see: Nardelli (1995) and for hydrogen-bond motifs, see: Etter et al. (1990).

Synthesis and crystallization top

The reagents and solvents for the synthesis were obtained from Aldrich Chemical Co., and were used without additional purification. The title molecule was synthesized using equimolar qu­anti­ties of 3,4-di­methyl­phenol and benzoyl chloride. 3,4-Di­methyl­phenol (0.50 g, 4.10 mmol) was added to a solution of anhydrous aluminum chloride (0.40 g, 3.00 mmol) in anhydrous di­chloro­methane (25 mL). The resulting solution was cooled and benzoyl chloride (0.57 g) was added slowly at 0-5°. After complete addition, the mixture was left under stirring at room temperature for 0.5 h, and then it was heated (reflux) to 50° C for 1 h. The reaction mixture was poured onto ice (100 g). The crude product was isolated by extraction with di­chloro­methane, and it was separated. The solution was dried over Na2SO4 and it was evaporated at room temperature. The obtained amorphous product was dissolved in methanol and the solution was left to slow evaporation. Colourless crystals of good quality were obtained with M.pt = 322 (1) K.

Refinement details top

All H-atoms were positioned at geometrically idealized positions with C—H distance of 0.95–0.98 Å, and with Uiso(H) = 1.2–1.5Ueq of the C-atoms to which they were bonded.

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2010); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2010); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2010); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELX97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 2012).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular conformation and atom numbering scheme for the title compound with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms are shown as spheres of arbitrary radius.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Part of the crystal structure of (I), showing the formation of chains which running along [100]. Symmetry code: (i) x-1, +y, +z.
3,4-Dimethylphenyl benzoate top
Crystal data top
C15H14O2Z = 2
Mr = 226.26F(000) = 240
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.272 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Melting point: 322(1) K
a = 6.0293 (4) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 7.8506 (3) ÅCell parameters from 2013 reflections
c = 13.1163 (9) Åθ = 3.1–29.6°
α = 88.592 (4)°µ = 0.08 mm1
β = 77.020 (5)°T = 123 K
γ = 77.680 (4)°Plate, colourless
V = 590.87 (6) Å30.33 × 0.25 × 0.06 mm
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur E
diffractometer
2965 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube2196 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.021
ω scansθmax = 29.8°, θmin = 3.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2010)
h = 88
Tmin = 0.977, Tmax = 1.000k = 1010
5782 measured reflectionsl = 1818
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.112H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0425P)2 + 0.1253P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2965 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
156 parametersΔρmax = 0.28 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.24 e Å3
Crystal data top
C15H14O2γ = 77.680 (4)°
Mr = 226.26V = 590.87 (6) Å3
Triclinic, P1Z = 2
a = 6.0293 (4) ÅMo Kα radiation
b = 7.8506 (3) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
c = 13.1163 (9) ÅT = 123 K
α = 88.592 (4)°0.33 × 0.25 × 0.06 mm
β = 77.020 (5)°
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur E
diffractometer
2965 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2010)
2196 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.977, Tmax = 1.000Rint = 0.021
5782 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0480 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.112H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.04Δρmax = 0.28 e Å3
2965 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.24 e Å3
156 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O70.50750 (18)0.19314 (11)0.74671 (8)0.0239 (2)
O80.74671 (18)0.27031 (12)0.83880 (8)0.0262 (3)
C10.4447 (2)0.36566 (16)0.71295 (11)0.0202 (3)
C20.2126 (2)0.44540 (17)0.74124 (11)0.0227 (3)
H20.10320.38880.78480.027*
C30.1425 (3)0.61121 (18)0.70426 (11)0.0236 (3)
H30.01710.66820.72310.028*
C40.3009 (3)0.69544 (17)0.64030 (11)0.0218 (3)
C50.5366 (2)0.61144 (17)0.61281 (11)0.0213 (3)
C60.6075 (2)0.44503 (17)0.64949 (11)0.0211 (3)
H60.76650.38650.63100.025*
C70.6508 (2)0.16320 (16)0.81492 (10)0.0184 (3)
C80.6695 (2)0.01620 (16)0.85620 (10)0.0182 (3)
C90.8327 (2)0.07177 (17)0.91616 (11)0.0226 (3)
H90.93220.00190.92670.027*
C100.8508 (3)0.23504 (18)0.96080 (12)0.0257 (3)
H100.96130.27271.00250.031*
C110.7073 (3)0.34264 (17)0.94426 (11)0.0252 (3)
H110.71920.45420.97480.030*
C120.5461 (3)0.28836 (17)0.88330 (11)0.0241 (3)
H120.44950.36350.87160.029*
C130.5251 (2)0.12484 (16)0.83937 (11)0.0205 (3)
H130.41350.08720.79820.025*
C140.2186 (3)0.87556 (18)0.60106 (13)0.0314 (4)
H14A0.05070.91470.62910.047*
H14B0.25090.87160.52440.047*
H14C0.30100.95700.62420.047*
C150.7122 (3)0.6999 (2)0.54453 (12)0.0292 (3)
H15A0.86920.62910.54000.044*
H15B0.70100.81510.57480.044*
H15C0.68070.71300.47430.044*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O70.0319 (6)0.0159 (4)0.0298 (6)0.0087 (4)0.0163 (5)0.0063 (4)
O80.0332 (6)0.0197 (5)0.0327 (6)0.0133 (4)0.0150 (5)0.0059 (4)
C10.0273 (8)0.0157 (6)0.0211 (7)0.0066 (5)0.0112 (6)0.0045 (5)
C20.0236 (7)0.0247 (7)0.0220 (7)0.0100 (6)0.0057 (6)0.0049 (6)
C30.0222 (7)0.0248 (7)0.0240 (7)0.0035 (6)0.0071 (6)0.0014 (6)
C40.0283 (8)0.0189 (6)0.0206 (7)0.0050 (6)0.0111 (6)0.0028 (5)
C50.0256 (8)0.0232 (7)0.0181 (7)0.0097 (6)0.0074 (6)0.0033 (5)
C60.0204 (7)0.0226 (7)0.0207 (7)0.0041 (5)0.0058 (6)0.0001 (5)
C70.0194 (7)0.0174 (6)0.0188 (7)0.0051 (5)0.0043 (5)0.0016 (5)
C80.0216 (7)0.0147 (6)0.0175 (7)0.0042 (5)0.0025 (5)0.0001 (5)
C90.0261 (8)0.0196 (6)0.0249 (7)0.0067 (5)0.0097 (6)0.0012 (6)
C100.0303 (8)0.0225 (7)0.0241 (7)0.0013 (6)0.0098 (6)0.0030 (6)
C110.0322 (8)0.0147 (6)0.0251 (8)0.0034 (6)0.0012 (6)0.0034 (5)
C120.0278 (8)0.0183 (6)0.0264 (8)0.0094 (6)0.0024 (6)0.0003 (6)
C130.0217 (7)0.0182 (6)0.0225 (7)0.0053 (5)0.0056 (6)0.0002 (5)
C140.0376 (9)0.0237 (7)0.0361 (9)0.0062 (6)0.0161 (7)0.0080 (6)
C150.0323 (9)0.0324 (8)0.0270 (8)0.0145 (7)0.0087 (7)0.0101 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O7—C71.3609 (16)C8—C131.3950 (18)
O7—C11.4145 (15)C9—C101.3892 (19)
O8—C71.2008 (16)C9—H90.9500
C1—C21.3755 (19)C10—C111.384 (2)
C1—C61.383 (2)C10—H100.9500
C2—C31.3909 (19)C11—C121.386 (2)
C2—H20.9500C11—H110.9500
C3—C41.391 (2)C12—C131.3867 (18)
C3—H30.9500C12—H120.9500
C4—C51.402 (2)C13—H130.9500
C4—C141.5133 (18)C14—H14A0.9800
C5—C61.3943 (19)C14—H14B0.9800
C5—C151.504 (2)C14—H14C0.9800
C6—H60.9500C15—H15A0.9800
C7—C81.4871 (17)C15—H15B0.9800
C8—C91.3872 (19)C15—H15C0.9800
C7—O7—C1117.97 (10)C8—C9—H9120.0
C2—C1—C6122.09 (13)C10—C9—H9120.0
C2—C1—O7116.62 (12)C11—C10—C9119.75 (14)
C6—C1—O7121.17 (12)C11—C10—H10120.1
C1—C2—C3118.16 (13)C9—C10—H10120.1
C1—C2—H2120.9C10—C11—C12120.31 (13)
C3—C2—H2120.9C10—C11—H11119.8
C2—C3—C4121.48 (14)C12—C11—H11119.8
C2—C3—H3119.3C11—C12—C13120.32 (13)
C4—C3—H3119.3C11—C12—H12119.8
C3—C4—C5119.23 (12)C13—C12—H12119.8
C3—C4—C14120.13 (13)C12—C13—C8119.38 (13)
C5—C4—C14120.64 (13)C12—C13—H13120.3
C6—C5—C4119.46 (13)C8—C13—H13120.3
C6—C5—C15120.11 (13)C4—C14—H14A109.5
C4—C5—C15120.43 (13)C4—C14—H14B109.5
C1—C6—C5119.57 (13)H14A—C14—H14B109.5
C1—C6—H6120.2C4—C14—H14C109.5
C5—C6—H6120.2H14A—C14—H14C109.5
O8—C7—O7123.50 (12)H14B—C14—H14C109.5
O8—C7—C8125.00 (13)C5—C15—H15A109.5
O7—C7—C8111.50 (11)C5—C15—H15B109.5
C9—C8—C13120.17 (12)H15A—C15—H15B109.5
C9—C8—C7117.48 (12)C5—C15—H15C109.5
C13—C8—C7122.32 (12)H15A—C15—H15C109.5
C8—C9—C10120.06 (13)H15B—C15—H15C109.5
C7—O7—C1—C2115.77 (14)C1—O7—C7—O88.5 (2)
C7—O7—C1—C667.97 (17)C1—O7—C7—C8170.72 (11)
C6—C1—C2—C30.1 (2)O8—C7—C8—C98.7 (2)
O7—C1—C2—C3176.31 (12)O7—C7—C8—C9172.01 (12)
C1—C2—C3—C40.1 (2)O8—C7—C8—C13169.10 (14)
C2—C3—C4—C50.2 (2)O7—C7—C8—C1310.15 (18)
C2—C3—C4—C14179.75 (13)C13—C8—C9—C100.8 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C60.4 (2)C7—C8—C9—C10177.06 (13)
C14—C4—C5—C6179.59 (13)C8—C9—C10—C110.7 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C15179.47 (13)C9—C10—C11—C120.1 (2)
C14—C4—C5—C150.6 (2)C10—C11—C12—C130.8 (2)
C2—C1—C6—C50.3 (2)C11—C12—C13—C80.7 (2)
O7—C1—C6—C5176.31 (12)C9—C8—C13—C120.1 (2)
C4—C5—C6—C10.4 (2)C7—C8—C13—C12177.65 (12)
C15—C5—C6—C1179.46 (13)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C2—H2···O8i0.952.473.3710 (18)157
Symmetry code: (i) x1, y, z.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C2—H2···O8i0.952.473.3710 (18)157
Symmetry code: (i) x1, y, z.
 

Acknowledgements

RMF thanks the Universidad del Valle, Colombia, for partial financial support.

References

First citationEtter, M. (1990). Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 120–126.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationGowda, B. T., Foro, S., Babitha, K. S. & Fuess, H. (2008a). Acta Cryst. E64, o844.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationGowda, B. T., Tokarčík, M., Kožíšek, J., Babitha, K. S. & Fuess, H. (2008b). Acta Cryst. E64, o1280.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMacrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453–457.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationNardelli, M. (1995). J. Appl. Cryst. 28, 659.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationOxford Diffraction (2010). CrysAlis PRO. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, England.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds