inorganic compounds
Redetermination of [EuCl2(H2O)6]Cl
aLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Butenandtstrasse 5-13, D-81377 München, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: constantin.hoch@cup.uni-muenchen.de
The et al. (1983). Aust. J. Chem. 36, 477–482], it could be shown that the atomic coordinates of some O atoms had been confused and now were corrected. Moreover, it was possible to freely refine the positions of the H atoms and thus to improve the accurracy of the [EuCl2(H2O)6]Cl crystallizes with the GdCl3·6H2O structure-type, exhibiting discrete [EuCl2(H2O)6]+ cations as the main building blocks. The main blocks are linked with isolated chloride anions via O—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds into a three-dimensional framework. The Eu3+ cation is located on a twofold rotation axis and is coordinated in the form of a Cl2O6 square antiprism. One chloride anion coordinates directly to Eu3+, whereas the other chloride anion, situated on a twofold rotation axis, is hydrogen bonded to six octahedrally arranged water molecules.
of the title compound, hexaaquadichloridoeuropium(III) chloride, was redetermined with modern crystallographic methods. In comparison with the previous study [LepertCCDC reference: 1001456
Related literature
For previous structure determinations of the title compound, see: Lepert et al. (1983); Bel'skii & Struchkov (1965). For the GdCl3·6H2O structure type and isotypic compounds, see: Marezio et al. (1961); Bell & Smith (1990); Burns & Peterson (1971); Graeber et al. (1966); Habenschuss & Spedding (1980); Hoch & Simon (2008); Junk et al. (1999); Reuter et al. (1994). For related structures, see: Demyanets et al. (1974); Reuter et al. (1994). For standardization of crystal data, see: Gelato & Parthé (1987).
Experimental
Crystal data
|
|
Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2006); cell X-AREA; data reduction: X-AREA; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Crystal Impact, 2007); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 1001456
10.1107/S1600536814010307/wm5012sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814010307/wm5012Isup2.hkl
The title compound was obtained by adding small portions of commercially available Eu2O3 (Alfa Aesar, 99.99%) into concentrated aqueous HCl solution at 353 K until only minor amounts of undissolved Eu2O3 remained visible for several minutes. The surplus Eu2O3 finally was dissolved by dropwise addition of concentrated HCl to the solution until a clear colourless solution was obtained. The solution was allowed to cool to 293 K, yielding colourless single-crystal blocks of [EuCl2(H2O)6]Cl.
The positions of all hydrogen atoms were identified from the difference Fourier map and were freely refined, applying one common isotropic displacement parameter to all six H atoms.
For better comparability of our structure model with the previous model by Lepert et al. (1983) we haved used the same setting in
P2/n. In the description given by Lepert et al. (1983) several misspellings of the atomic positions were adopted into the databases. The published model leads to diverging refinements if taken as starting values. We have analysed the misspellings and give a conclusive assignment of the atomic positions. If standardized by the program STRUCTURE-TIDY (Gelato & Parthé, 1987), the comparison of our model with the one given by Lepert et al. (1983) shows, in addition to an origin shift of (0, 1/2, 0), that the y and z coordinates of atoms O1, O2 and O3 were permutated. In fact, y(O1) and z(O1) belong to y(O3) and z(O3), y(O2) and z(O2) belong to y(O1) and z(O1), and finally y(O3) and z(O3) belong to y(O2) and z(O2). If re-ordered in the given way, the based on starting values from Lepert et al. (1983) lead to convergence in few cycles with satisfying results.Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2006); cell
X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2006); data reduction: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2006); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Crystal Impact, 2007); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).Fig. 1. The cationic [Eu(H2O)6Cl2]+ unit in [Eu(H2O)6Cl2]Cl. Ellipsoids are drawn at 75% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are drawn as small black spheres with arbitrary radius. [Symmetry code: (i) 3/2 - x, y, 1/2 - z; (ii) x, y, -1 + z; (iii) 3/2 - x, y, 3/2 - z; (iv) 1 - x, -y, 1 - z; (v) 1/2 + x, -y, -1/2 + z.] | |
Fig. 2. View along [010] on the crystal structure of [Eu(H2O)6Cl2]Cl. Small black spheres represent H atoms, blue ellipsoids represent Eu atoms, olive ellipsoids represent Cl atoms, turquoise ellipsoids represent O atoms. Grey polyhedra represent the coordination of H atoms around Cl atoms. | |
Fig. 3. The coordination sphere of the coordinating Cl1 atom is a distorted tetrahedron built from three water molecules and one europium atom. The water molecules coordinate via hydrogen bonds. [Symmetry codes: (i) 1 - x, -y, 1 - z; (ii) 1/2 + x, 1 - y, 1/2 + z; (iii) 3/2 - x, y 3/2 - z; (iv) x, y, 1 + z.] | |
Fig. 4. The coordination sphere of the anionic Cl2 atom consists of six water molecules coordinating via their hydrogen atoms forming a distorted octahedron. [Symmetry codes: (i) 3/2 - x, y, 1/2 - z; (ii) x, y, 1 + z; (iii) 3/2 - x, 1 + y, 3/2 - z; (iv) x, 1 + y, z; (v) 1 - x, 1 - y, 1 - z; (vi) 1/2 + x, 1 - y, 1/2 + z.] |
[EuCl2(H2O)6]Cl | Z = 2 |
Mr = 366.41 | F(000) = 348 |
Monoclinic, P2/n | Dx = 2.441 Mg m−3 |
Hall symbol: -P 2yac | Ag Kα radiation, λ = 0.56083 Å |
a = 9.6438 (12) Å | Cell parameters from 13548 reflections |
b = 6.5322 (10) Å | µ = 3.74 mm−1 |
c = 7.929 (3) Å | T = 293 K |
β = 93.653 (13)° | Stretched cuboid, clear colourless |
V = 498.4 (2) Å3 | 0.23 × 0.20 × 0.18 mm |
Stoe IPDS I diffractometer | 1762 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1653 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.043 |
ϕ scan | θmax = 25.5°, θmin = 3.0° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (MulScanAbs in PLATON; Spek, 2009) | h = −14→14 |
Tmin = 0.425, Tmax = 0.510 | k = −10→10 |
13401 measured reflections | l = −11→11 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.015 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.032 | All H-atom parameters refined |
S = 1.03 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.015P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1762 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
66 parameters | Δρmax = 0.63 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.77 e Å−3 |
[EuCl2(H2O)6]Cl | V = 498.4 (2) Å3 |
Mr = 366.41 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, P2/n | Ag Kα radiation, λ = 0.56083 Å |
a = 9.6438 (12) Å | µ = 3.74 mm−1 |
b = 6.5322 (10) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 7.929 (3) Å | 0.23 × 0.20 × 0.18 mm |
β = 93.653 (13)° |
Stoe IPDS I diffractometer | 1762 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (MulScanAbs in PLATON; Spek, 2009) | 1653 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.425, Tmax = 0.510 | Rint = 0.043 |
13401 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.015 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.032 | All H-atom parameters refined |
S = 1.03 | Δρmax = 0.63 e Å−3 |
1762 reflections | Δρmin = −0.77 e Å−3 |
66 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Eu1 | 0.7500 | 0.150918 (18) | 0.2500 | 0.01345 (3) | |
Cl1 | 0.44156 (5) | 0.16532 (7) | 0.76010 (6) | 0.02588 (9) | |
Cl2 | 0.7500 | 0.62387 (11) | 0.7500 | 0.02813 (13) | |
O1 | 0.85427 (18) | 0.4256 (2) | 0.0872 (2) | 0.0275 (3) | |
O2 | 0.78164 (18) | 0.0484 (2) | 0.9561 (2) | 0.0263 (3) | |
O3 | 0.56055 (17) | 0.3002 (2) | 0.1060 (2) | 0.0278 (3) | |
H1 | 0.827 (4) | 0.454 (6) | 0.001 (5) | 0.051 (4)* | |
H2 | 0.846 (3) | 0.084 (5) | 0.902 (4) | 0.035 (3)* | |
H3 | 0.766 (4) | −0.063 (7) | 0.933 (5) | 0.058 (5)* | |
H4 | 0.551 (4) | 0.265 (6) | 0.020 (5) | 0.052 (5)* | |
H5 | 0.881 (4) | 0.520 (5) | 0.129 (5) | 0.040 (3)* | |
H6 | 0.491 (4) | 0.319 (6) | 0.152 (5) | 0.044 (4)* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Eu1 | 0.01398 (5) | 0.01346 (5) | 0.01244 (6) | 0.000 | −0.00293 (3) | 0.000 |
Cl1 | 0.02417 (18) | 0.02396 (18) | 0.0286 (2) | −0.00652 (16) | −0.00541 (16) | 0.00198 (17) |
Cl2 | 0.0297 (3) | 0.0305 (3) | 0.0235 (3) | 0.000 | −0.0033 (2) | 0.000 |
O1 | 0.0368 (8) | 0.0229 (6) | 0.0214 (8) | −0.0100 (6) | −0.0085 (6) | 0.0038 (5) |
O2 | 0.0336 (7) | 0.0277 (7) | 0.0175 (7) | −0.0047 (6) | −0.0001 (6) | −0.0039 (5) |
O3 | 0.0250 (6) | 0.0317 (7) | 0.0250 (8) | 0.0067 (5) | −0.0113 (6) | −0.0028 (5) |
Eu1—O1 | 2.4618 (15) | O2—H3 | 0.76 (4) |
Eu1—O1i | 2.4618 (16) | O2—H2 | 0.81 (3) |
Eu1—O2ii | 2.4620 (18) | O3—H4 | 0.72 (4) |
Eu1—O2iii | 2.4620 (18) | O3—H6 | 0.79 (4) |
Eu1—O3 | 2.3078 (16) | Cl1—H2 | 2.535 (4) |
Eu1—O3i | 2.3078 (15) | Cl1—H4 | 2.3535 (4) |
Eu1—Cl1iv | 2.7690 (12) | Cl1—H5vi | 2.36 (3) |
Eu1—Cl1v | 2.7690 (12) | Cl2—H1i | 2.36 (4) |
O1—H1 | 0.74 (4) | Cl2—H3vii | 2.5071 (4) |
O1—H5 | 0.74 (4) | Cl2—H6viii | 2.53 (4) |
Eu1—O1—H1 | 122 (3) | O1—Eu1—O2ii | 67.83 (6) |
Eu1—O1—H1 | 122 (3) | O1i—Eu1—Cl1iv | 105.35 (5) |
Eu1—O1—H5 | 121 (3) | O1—Eu1—Cl1iv | 145.35 (4) |
Eu1—O1—H5 | 121 (3) | O2ii—Eu1—O2iii | 148.45 (8) |
Eu1ix—O2—H2 | 124 (3) | O2ii—Eu1—Cl1iv | 83.83 (4) |
Eu1ix—O2—H2 | 124 (3) | O2iii—Eu1—Cl1iv | 72.65 (4) |
Eu1ix—O2—H3 | 117 (3) | O3i—Eu1—O1i | 76.70 (6) |
Eu1ix—O2—H3 | 117 (3) | O3—Eu1—O1i | 67.31 (6) |
Eu1—O3—H4 | 112 (3) | O3i—Eu1—O2ii | 116.15 (7) |
Eu1—O3—H4 | 112 (3) | O3—Eu1—O2ii | 77.82 (6) |
Eu1—O3—H6 | 120 (3) | O3i—Eu1—O3 | 130.01 (8) |
Eu1—O3—H6 | 120 (3) | O3i—Eu1—Cl1iv | 146.64 (4) |
O1i—Eu1—O1 | 86.43 (9) | O3—Eu1—Cl1iv | 78.18 (5) |
O1i—Eu1—O2ii | 140.68 (5) | Cl1iv—Eu1—Cl1v | 83.51 (2) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+3/2, y, −z+1/2; (ii) x, y, z−1; (iii) −x+3/2, y, −z+3/2; (iv) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (v) x+1/2, −y, z−1/2; (vi) x−1/2, −y+1, z+1/2; (vii) x, y+1, z; (viii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ix) x, y, z+1. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O1—H1···Cl2ii | 0.74 (4) | 2.36 (4) | 3.081 (2) | 166.08 |
O2—H2···Cl1iii | 0.81 (3) | 2.54 (3) | 3.351 (2) | 174.97 |
O2—H3···Cl2x | 0.76 (4) | 2.51 (4) | 3.2234 (19) | 157.37 |
O3—H4···Cl1ii | 0.72 (4) | 2.35 (4) | 3.036 (2) | 160.44 |
O1—H5vi···Cl1 | 0.74 (2) | 2.36 (3) | 3.095 (2) | 173.89 |
O3—H6···Cl2viii | 0.79 (4) | 2.53 (4) | 3.310 (2) | 170.66 |
Symmetry codes: (ii) x, y, z−1; (iii) −x+3/2, y, −z+3/2; (vi) x−1/2, −y+1, z+1/2; (viii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (x) x, y−1, z. |
Eu1—O1 | 2.4618 (15) | Eu1—O3 | 2.3078 (16) |
Eu1—O2i | 2.4620 (18) | Eu1—Cl1ii | 2.7690 (12) |
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z−1; (ii) −x+1, −y, −z+1. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O1—H1···Cl2i | 0.74 (4) | 2.36 (4) | 3.081 (2) | 166.08 |
O2—H2···Cl1iii | 0.81 (3) | 2.54 (3) | 3.351 (2) | 174.97 |
O2—H3···Cl2iv | 0.76 (4) | 2.51 (4) | 3.2234 (19) | 157.37 |
O3—H4···Cl1i | 0.72 (4) | 2.35 (4) | 3.036 (2) | 160.44 |
O1—H5v···Cl1 | 0.74 (2) | 2.36 (3) | 3.095 (2) | 173.89 |
O3—H6···Cl2vi | 0.79 (4) | 2.53 (4) | 3.310 (2) | 170.66 |
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z−1; (iii) −x+3/2, y, −z+3/2; (iv) x, y−1, z; (v) x−1/2, −y+1, z+1/2; (vi) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1. |
References
Bell, A. M. T. & Smith, A. J. (1990). Acta Cryst. C46, 960–962. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bel'skii, N. K. & Struchkov, Yu. T. (1965). Kristallografiya, 10, 21–28. CAS Google Scholar
Burns, J. H. & Peterson, J. R. (1971). Inorg. Chem. 10, 147–151. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Crystal Impact (2007). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Demyanets, L. N., Bukin, V. I., Emelyanova, E. N. & Ivanov, V. I. (1974). Sov. Phys. Crystallogr. 18, 806–808. Google Scholar
Gelato, L. M. & Parthé, E. (1987). J. Appl. Cryst. 20, 139–143. CrossRef Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Graeber, E. J., Conrad, G. H. & Duliere, S. F. (1966). Acta Cryst. 21, 1012–1013. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Habenschuss, A. & Spedding, F. H. (1980). Cryst. Struct. Commun. 9, 71–75. CAS Google Scholar
Hoch, C. & Simon, A. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, i35. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Junk, P. C., Semenova, L. I., Skelton, B. W. & White, A. H. (1999). Aust. J. Chem. 52, 531–538. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Lepert, D. L., Patrick, J. M. & White, A. H. (1983). Aust. J. Chem. 36, 477–482. Google Scholar
Marezio, M., Plettinger, H. A. & Zachariasen, W. H. (1961). Acta Cryst. 14, 234–236. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Reuter, G., Fink, H. & Seifert, H. J. (1994). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 620, 665–671. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Stoe & Cie (2006). X-AREA. Stoe & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany. Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
[EuCl2(H2O)6]Cl crystallizes with the GdCl3.6H2O structure type (Marezio et al., 1961), like many metal trichloride hexahydrates MCl3.6H2O with M = Y (Bell & Smith, 1990), Ce (Reuter et al., 1994), Nd (Habenschuss & Spedding, 1980), Sm - Tm (Graeber et al., 1966), Am, Bk (Burns & Peterson, 1971), and three bromide hexahydrates MBr3.6H2O with M = Pr, Dy (Junk et al., 1999) and Eu (Hoch & Simon, 2008). The first structure determination of the title compound was performed on the basis of film data (Bel'skii & Struchkov, 1965) and without determination of the hydrogen atom positions. A first exact structure determination with all atomic positions was performed by Lepert et al. (1983). However, the published data contain errors in the atomic coordinates. We have thus redetermined the structure on the basis of modern area detector data.
The Eu3+ cation in [EuCl2(H2O)6]Cl is located on a twofold rotation axis and is coordinated in form of a distorted square antiprism defined by six water molecules and two chloride anions (Fig. 1, Table 1). Hydrogen bonds O—H···Cl connect the [EuCl2(H2O)6]+ cations with the Cl- counter-anions to a three-dimensional framework (Fig 2). The complexing chloride anion Cl1 is surrounded by three, the isolated chloride anion Cl2 by six H atoms (Figs. 3, 4), forming hydrogen bonds with Cl···H distances between 2.36 (4) and 2.54 (3) Å (Table 2) and are in good agreement with those in other chloride hydrates. The EuIII—O distances in [EuCl2(H2O)6]Cl range from 2.3078 (16) to 2.4620 (18) Å and are comparable with those in EuCl3.3H2O (2.39–2.40 Å; Reuter et al., 1994), EuCl3.6H2O (2.39–2.43 Å; Graeber et al., 1966), or EuCl(OH)2 (2.35–2.44 Å; Demyanets et al., 1974) and also with those in EuBr3.6H2O (Hoch & Simon, 2008).