organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

(2E,7E)-2,7-Bis[(thio­phen-2-yl)methyl­­idene]cyclo­hepta­none

aDepartment of Applied Chemistry, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi 682 022, India, and bDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Eastern University, Sri Lanka, Chenkalady, Sri Lanka
*Correspondence e-mail: msithambaresan@gmail.com

(Received 15 May 2014; accepted 22 May 2014; online 31 May 2014)

The whole molecule of the title compound, C17H16OS2, is generated by two-fold rotational symmetry. The carbonyl C and O atoms of the cycloheptanone ring lie on the twofold rotation axis which bisects the opposite –CH2–CH2– bond of the ring. The mol­ecule exists in an E,E conformation with respect to the C=C double bond. The cyclo­hepta­none ring exhibits a twisted chair conformation and its mean plane makes a dihedral angle of 50.12 (19)° with the planes of the thio­phene rings. The two S atoms are in an anti arrangement with respect the carbonyl O atom and the dihedral angle between the two thio­phene ring planes is 69.38 (7)°. In the molecule, there are two intramolecular C—H⋯S hydrogen bond, forming S(6) ring motifs. In the crystal, inversion dimers are generated via pairs of C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. These dimers are inter­connected by another inter­action of the same kind with a neighbouring mol­ecule, forming a mol­ecular chain along the c-axis direction.

Related literature

For applications of thio­phene derivatives in conducting polymers and biology, see: Kolodziejczyk et al. (2013[Kolodziejczyk, B., Mayevsky, D. & Winther-Jensen, B. (2013). RSC Adv. 3, 4568-4573.]); Mishra et al. (2011[Mishra, R., Tomar, I., Singhal, S. & Jha, K. K. (2011). Der Pharma Chem. 3, 38-54.]). For the synthesis of related compounds, see: Alkskas et al. (2013[Alkskas, A. I., Alhubgeb, A. M. & Azamc, F. (2013). Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 31, 471-480.]). For related structures, see: Liang et al. (2007[Liang, G., Yang, S.-L., Wang, X.-H., Li, Y.-R. & Li, X.-K. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o4118.]); Layana et al. (2014[Layana, S. R., Sithambaresan, M., Siji, V. L., Sudarsanakumar, M. R. & Suma, S. (2014). Acta Cryst. E70, o591.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • C17H16OS2

  • Mr = 300.44

  • Orthorhombic, P b c n

  • a = 16.383 (2) Å

  • b = 11.6119 (14) Å

  • c = 7.8213 (7) Å

  • V = 1487.9 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.35 mm−1

  • T = 296 K

  • 0.40 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm

Data collection
  • Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2004[Bruker (2004). SADABS, APEX2, XPREP and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) Tmin = 0.873, Tmax = 0.933

  • 4249 measured reflections

  • 1296 independent reflections

  • 970 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.025

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.049

  • wR(F2) = 0.162

  • S = 1.03

  • 1296 reflections

  • 92 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.33 e Å−3

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C7—H7A⋯S1 0.97 2.53 3.205 (3) 126
C7—H7B⋯O1i 0.97 2.53 3.282 (3) 135
Symmetry code: (i) -x+2, -y+1, -z+1.

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004[Bruker (2004). SADABS, APEX2, XPREP and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2004[Bruker (2004). SADABS, APEX2, XPREP and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT and XPREP (Bruker, 2004[Bruker (2004). SADABS, APEX2, XPREP and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012[Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849-854.]) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2010[Brandenburg, K. (2010). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and publCIF (Westrip, 2010[Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.]).

Supporting information


Comment top

Thiophenes are often a subject of considerable interest due to their numerous and interesting conducting properties as polymers and for their biological properties. The incorporation of rigid spacers into the thiophene backbone is anticipated to offer several distinct advantages. A polymer can be extended to afford a more planar conformation through diminished steric effects so that a maximum degree of delocalization of the π electrons is achieved (Kolodziejczyk et al., 2013). Some thiophene derivatives were also evaluated for anti-cancer activity against PC-3 cell lines, for in vitro antioxidant potential and for β-glucuronidase and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities. Some also showed a potent DPPH radical scavenging antioxidant activity (Mishra et al., 2011).

The title compound (Scheme 1, Fig. 1) crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pbcn. It has an E configuration with respect to the C6=C7 bond on both sides of the cycloheptanone ring. The central moiety (cycloheptanone) exists in a twisted chair form making a dihedral angle of 50.12 (19)° with the thiophene ring. The C9–O1 (1.227 (5) Å) bond distance is very close to the reported bond lengths (1.222 (3) Å) of a keto group of a similar structure (Liang et al., 2007). The two sulfur atoms are in an anti arrangement with respect to the carbonyl O atom and the dihedral angle between the two five-membered thiophene ring planes is 69.38 (7)°. There are no classical hydrogen bond interactions present in the structure. However, an intramolecular H bond interaction between one of the H atoms at C7 atom and the S1 atom forms a five membered ring with a D···A distance of 3.205 (3) Å (Fig. 2) within the molecule whereas two C—H···O intermolecular hydrogen bond interactions with a D···A distance of 3.282 (3) Å (Table 1) between H7A and O1 generate a centrosymmetric dimer (Layana et al., 2014) and also chain these centrosymmetric dimers into a 1-D chain along the c axis in the lattice (Fig. 3). In addition to this, there are two very weak π···π interactions found in the crystal between the thiophene rings with centroid-centroid distances of greater than 4 Å. Fig. 4 shows the packing of the title compound along c axis.

Related literature top

For applications of thiophene derivatives in conducting polymers and biology, see: Kolodziejczyk et al. (2013); Mishra et al. (2011). For the synthesis of related compounds, see: Alkskas et al. (2013). For related structures, see: Liang et al. (2007); Layana et al. (2014).

Experimental top

The title compound was prepared by adapting a reported procedure (Alkskas et al., 2013). To a mixture of cycloheptanone (0.50 g, 4.4 mmol) and thiophene-2-carboxaldehyde (1.01 g, 8.7 mmol) in methanol (25 ml) taken up in a 100 ml flask, potassium hydroxide pellets (0.5 g, 8.7 mmol) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 15 minutes whilst a yellow product separated out. The mixture was heated in a hot water bath at 60 °C for 6 h. until an appreciable amount of solid formed. The flask was then cooled in ice and the precipitate that separated out was collected by vacuum filtration. The crude product was washed several times with ice cold 1 ml portions of ethanol. Recrystallization from methanol gave diffraction quality crystals (yield 98%). m.p: 144–146 °C.

IR (KBr, ν in cm-1): 2906, 1598, 1401,1297. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, δ, p.p.m): 7.58 (d, 1H), 7.46(d, 1H), 7.31(t, 1H), 7.10 (s, 1H), 2.80 (t, 2H), 1.95 (m, 2H).

Refinement top

All H atoms on C were placed in calculated positions, guided by difference maps, with C—H bond distances of 0.93–0.97 Å. H atoms were assigned Uiso(H) values of 1.2Ueq(carrier).

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004); cell refinement: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2004); data reduction: SAINT and XPREP (Bruker, 2004); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2010); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. ORTEP view of the compound, drawn with 50% probability displacement ellipsoids for the non-H atoms. Symmetry operator (i): (i) -x+2, y, -z+1/2.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Centrosymmetric dimer formed by means of C–H···O interaction found in the title compound C17H16OS2.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. C—H···O interactions forming a 1-D molecular chain along the c axis.
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. A view of the unit cell along the c axis.
(2E,7E)-2,7-Bis[(thiophen-2-yl)methylidene]cycloheptanone top
Crystal data top
C17H16OS2F(000) = 632
Mr = 300.44Dx = 1.341 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PbcnMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2n 2abCell parameters from 1331 reflections
a = 16.383 (2) Åθ = 2.5–28.4°
b = 11.6119 (14) ŵ = 0.35 mm1
c = 7.8213 (7) ÅT = 296 K
V = 1487.9 (3) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 40.40 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
1296 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube970 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.025
Detector resolution: 8.33 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.5°
ω and ϕ scanh = 199
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2004)
k = 1213
Tmin = 0.873, Tmax = 0.933l = 95
4249 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.049Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.162H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0941P)2 + 0.5613P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1296 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
92 parametersΔρmax = 0.20 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.33 e Å3
Crystal data top
C17H16OS2V = 1487.9 (3) Å3
Mr = 300.44Z = 4
Orthorhombic, PbcnMo Kα radiation
a = 16.383 (2) ŵ = 0.35 mm1
b = 11.6119 (14) ÅT = 296 K
c = 7.8213 (7) Å0.40 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
1296 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2004)
970 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.873, Tmax = 0.933Rint = 0.025
4249 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0490 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.162H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03Δρmax = 0.20 e Å3
1296 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.33 e Å3
92 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.6448 (2)0.2975 (4)0.3099 (5)0.0826 (12)
H10.60390.24590.34030.099*
C20.6311 (2)0.3968 (4)0.2293 (5)0.0817 (11)
H20.57930.42170.19760.098*
C30.70218 (17)0.4600 (3)0.1968 (4)0.0570 (8)
H30.70280.53090.14130.068*
C40.77149 (18)0.4051 (2)0.2567 (3)0.0541 (7)
C50.85397 (16)0.4491 (2)0.2406 (3)0.0503 (7)
H50.85750.51900.18310.060*
C60.92557 (17)0.4079 (2)0.2929 (3)0.0502 (7)
C70.9388 (2)0.2988 (3)0.3929 (4)0.0635 (8)
H7A0.89020.28390.46040.076*
H7B0.98360.31120.47190.076*
C80.9573 (2)0.1929 (3)0.2876 (5)0.0744 (9)
H8A0.91800.18760.19520.089*
H8B0.95080.12520.35890.089*
C91.00000.4747 (3)0.25000.0527 (10)
O11.00000.5804 (2)0.25000.0718 (9)
S10.74489 (6)0.27612 (8)0.35060 (12)0.0737 (4)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.087 (3)0.077 (3)0.083 (2)0.033 (2)0.035 (2)0.0259 (19)
C20.064 (2)0.088 (3)0.093 (3)0.0080 (18)0.0067 (18)0.036 (2)
C30.0537 (18)0.0508 (16)0.0664 (18)0.0055 (12)0.0001 (14)0.0088 (13)
C40.0653 (19)0.0458 (15)0.0511 (15)0.0061 (13)0.0077 (13)0.0088 (13)
C50.0605 (18)0.0406 (14)0.0497 (15)0.0045 (12)0.0015 (12)0.0009 (12)
C60.0611 (18)0.0449 (15)0.0447 (14)0.0029 (12)0.0001 (12)0.0012 (11)
C70.076 (2)0.0562 (18)0.0583 (17)0.0009 (15)0.0001 (15)0.0126 (14)
C80.095 (3)0.0469 (16)0.081 (2)0.0040 (16)0.0034 (19)0.0095 (15)
C90.060 (2)0.047 (2)0.051 (2)0.0000.0125 (18)0.000
O10.0603 (18)0.0437 (16)0.111 (3)0.0000.0167 (16)0.000
S10.0880 (7)0.0573 (6)0.0757 (6)0.0154 (4)0.0209 (4)0.0017 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C21.333 (5)C6—C91.484 (3)
C1—S11.689 (4)C6—C71.504 (4)
C1—H10.9300C7—C81.511 (4)
C2—C31.400 (5)C7—H7A0.9700
C2—H20.9300C7—H7B0.9700
C3—C41.384 (4)C8—C8i1.517 (7)
C3—H30.9300C8—H8A0.9700
C4—C51.450 (4)C8—H8B0.9700
C4—S11.724 (3)C9—O11.227 (5)
C5—C61.332 (4)C9—C6i1.484 (3)
C5—H50.9300
C2—C1—S1112.4 (3)C9—C6—C7116.1 (2)
C2—C1—H1123.8C6—C7—C8115.5 (3)
S1—C1—H1123.8C6—C7—H7A108.4
C1—C2—C3113.5 (3)C8—C7—H7A108.4
C1—C2—H2123.3C6—C7—H7B108.4
C3—C2—H2123.3C8—C7—H7B108.4
C4—C3—C2112.3 (3)H7A—C7—H7B107.5
C4—C3—H3123.9C7—C8—C8i113.4 (2)
C2—C3—H3123.9C7—C8—H8A108.9
C3—C4—C5124.9 (3)C8i—C8—H8A108.9
C3—C4—S1109.7 (2)C7—C8—H8B108.9
C5—C4—S1125.4 (2)C8i—C8—H8B108.9
C6—C5—C4131.8 (3)H8A—C8—H8B107.7
C6—C5—H5114.1O1—C9—C6121.53 (16)
C4—C5—H5114.1O1—C9—C6i121.53 (16)
C5—C6—C9117.8 (2)C6—C9—C6i116.9 (3)
C5—C6—C7126.1 (3)C1—S1—C492.15 (18)
S1—C1—C2—C30.1 (4)C9—C6—C7—C886.3 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C40.2 (4)C6—C7—C8—C8i73.2 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C5179.5 (3)C5—C6—C9—O136.8 (3)
C2—C3—C4—S10.2 (3)C7—C6—C9—O1143.08 (18)
C3—C4—C5—C6178.9 (3)C5—C6—C9—C6i143.2 (3)
S1—C4—C5—C62.0 (4)C7—C6—C9—C6i36.92 (18)
C4—C5—C6—C9178.3 (2)C2—C1—S1—C40.0 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C71.8 (5)C3—C4—S1—C10.1 (2)
C5—C6—C7—C893.8 (4)C5—C4—S1—C1179.4 (2)
Symmetry code: (i) x+2, y, z+1/2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C7—H7A···S10.972.533.205 (3)126
C7—H7B···O1ii0.972.533.282 (3)135
Symmetry code: (ii) x+2, y+1, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C7—H7A···S10.97002.533.205 (3)126
C7—H7B···O1i0.972.533.282 (3)135
Symmetry code: (i) x+2, y+1, z+1.
 

Acknowledgements

We thank the Sophisticated Analytical Instruments Facility, Cochin University of S & T, for the diffraction and NMR measurements. CN thanks INSPIRE, DST, New Delhi, India, for a fellowship.

References

First citationAlkskas, A. I., Alhubgeb, A. M. & Azamc, F. (2013). Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 31, 471–480.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationBrandenburg, K. (2010). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.  Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2004). SADABS, APEX2, XPREP and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationKolodziejczyk, B., Mayevsky, D. & Winther-Jensen, B. (2013). RSC Adv. 3, 4568–4573.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationLayana, S. R., Sithambaresan, M., Siji, V. L., Sudarsanakumar, M. R. & Suma, S. (2014). Acta Cryst. E70, o591.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationLiang, G., Yang, S.-L., Wang, X.-H., Li, Y.-R. & Li, X.-K. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o4118.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMishra, R., Tomar, I., Singhal, S. & Jha, K. K. (2011). Der Pharma Chem. 3, 38–54.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds