metal-organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Bis{bis­­[1-meth­­oxy-2-(2-meth­­oxy­eth­­oxy)ethane-κ3O,O′,O′′]sodium} 1,1,2,2-tetra­phenyl­ethane-1,2-diide

aA.V. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences, 29 Leninsky Prospect, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation, and bUniversity of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: mminyaev@mail.ru

(Received 23 May 2014; accepted 2 June 2014; online 7 June 2014)

Crystals of the title salt, [Na(C6H14O3)2]2(C26H20), were grown from a tetra­hydro­furan/diglyme/Et2O solvent mixture [diglyme is 1-meth­oxy-2-(2-meth­oxy­eth­oxy)ethane]. The cations and dianion are separated in the crystal structure, unlike in the other three structurally characterized dialkali metal tetra­phenyl­ethyl­ene salts. The asymmetric unit contains one [Na(diglyme)2]+ cation and one half of the [Ph2CCPh2]2− dianion. The latter lies on a twofold rotation axis. C—C bond-length redistribution displays that excessive electron density of the dianion is predominantly located at the C atoms of a former double bond and at all eight ortho positions. The studied crystal was a twin, with the ratio of two major components being 0.2143 (9):0.7857 (9). The twin operation is a twofold rotation around the a axis.

Related literature

For the crystal structure of free tetra­phenyl­ethyl­enide, see: Hua et al. (2007[Hua, G., Li, Ya., Slawin, A. M. Z. & Woollins, J. D. (2007). Dalton Trans. pp. 1477-1480.]). For the preparation and reactivity of disodiumtetra­phenyl­ethyl­ene, see: Schlenk & Bergmann (1928[Schlenk, W. & Bergmann, E. (1928). Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 463, 1-97.]). For UV–VIS data, see: Roberts & Szwarc (1965[Roberts, R. C. & Szwarc, M. (1965). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 87, 5542-5548.]). For 1H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra, see: Roitershtein et al. (1998[Roitershtein, D. M., Ziller, J. W. & Evans, W. J. (1998). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 11342-11346.]). For crystal structures of related alkali-metal tetra­phenyl­ethyl­ene salts, see: Bock et al. (1989[Bock, H., Ruppert, K. & Fenske, D. (1989). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 28, 1685-1688.], 1996[Bock, H., Hauck, T. & Näther, C. (1996). Organometallics, 15, 1527-1529.]); Minyaev et al. (2007[Minyaev, M. E., Lyssenko, K. A., Belyakov, P. A., Antipin, M. Yu. & Roitershtein, D. M. (2007). Mendeleev Commun. 17, 102-104.]). For crystal structures of hetero- and homoleptic d- and f-metal complexes with the tetra­phenyl­ethilene dianion, see: Roitershtein et al. (1998[Roitershtein, D. M., Ziller, J. W. & Evans, W. J. (1998). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 11342-11346.], 2004[Roitershtein, D. M., Minyaev, M. E., Lyssenko, K. A., Belyakov, P. A. & Antipin, M. Yu. (2004). Russ. Chem. Bull. Int. Ed. 53, 2152-2161.], 2007[Roitershtein, D. M., Minyaev, M. E., Mikhailyuk, A. A., Lyssenko, K. A., Belyakov, P. A. & Antipin, M. Yu. (2007). Russ. Chem. Bull. Int. Ed. 56, 1978-1985.]); Minyaev et al. (2007[Minyaev, M. E., Lyssenko, K. A., Belyakov, P. A., Antipin, M. Yu. & Roitershtein, D. M. (2007). Mendeleev Commun. 17, 102-104.]).

[Scheme 1]

Experimental

Crystal data
  • [Na(C6H14O3)2]2(C26H20)

  • Mr = 915.08

  • Monoclinic, C 2/c

  • a = 10.048 (2) Å

  • b = 24.165 (5) Å

  • c = 20.978 (4) Å

  • β = 92.92 (3)°

  • V = 5087.0 (18) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.10 mm−1

  • T = 123 K

  • 0.50 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm

Data collection
  • Siemens SMART Platform CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (TWINABS; Bruker, 2003[Bruker (2003). SMART, SAINT and TWINABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) Tmin = 0.657, Tmax = 0.746

  • 6286 measured reflections

  • 6286 independent reflections

  • 5347 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Refinement
  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048

  • wR(F2) = 0.115

  • S = 1.06

  • 6286 reflections

  • 294 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.42 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3

Table 1
Selected bond lengths (Å)

C1—C1i 1.507 (3)
C1—C2 1.438 (2)
C1—C8 1.429 (2)
C2—C3 1.424 (3)
C2—C7 1.434 (3)
C3—C4 1.384 (3)
C4—C5 1.390 (3)
C5—C6 1.390 (3)
C6—C7 1.387 (3)
C8—C9 1.433 (3)
C8—C13 1.436 (3)
C9—C10 1.380 (3)
C10—C11 1.389 (3)
C11—C12 1.394 (3)
C12—C13 1.378 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) [-x+1, y, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}].

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2003[Bruker (2003). SMART, SAINT and TWINABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); cell refinement: CELL_NOW (Sheldrick, 2003[Sheldrick, G. M. (2003). CELL-NOW. University of Göttingen, Germany.]) and SAINT (Bruker, 2003[Bruker (2003). SMART, SAINT and TWINABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS2012 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2012 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL2012 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010[Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.]).

Supporting information


Comment top

Detailed preparation and reactivity of disodiumtetraphenylethylene were described by Schlenk & Bergmann (1928). Since then, properties of the tetraphenylethylene dianion and radical-anion have been intensively studied, including electronic spectra, 1H and 13C NMR spectral data, electrochemistry and etc. For example, ligand to metal charge transfer absorption band of the disodiumtetraphenylethylene in THF solution was reported by Roberts & Szwarc (1965); 1H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra of disodiumtetraphenylethylene in THFd-8 have been reported by Roitershtein et al. (1998).

Synthetic applications of the tetraphenylethylene dianion are remarkably few. Reactivity of the tetraphenylethylene dianion towards formation either d- or f-element complexes is not well established so far. Only five crystal structures of hetero- and homoleptic complexes of lanthanides and yttrium with the tetraphenylethylene dianion have been reported: [Na(thf)6]2[Y(Ph4C2)2](thf)2, (Roitershtein et al., 1998), [Na(diglyme)2][Lu(Ph4C2)2](thf)0.5 (Roitershtein et al., 2004), [Na(thf)3][Na(thf)4][Yb(Ph4C2)2] (Minyaev et al., 2007), [(C5H5)Lu(Ph4C2)(dme)](dme) (Roitershtein et al., 2004) (dme is 1,2-dimethoxyethane), [(1,3–Ph2C5H3)Lu(Ph4C2)(thf)] (Roitershtein et al., 2007).

As a part of our research project on synthesis and structural characterization of new tetraphenylethenide derivatives of rare-earth metals, we have explored reaction of disodiumtetraphenylethylene with anhydrous scandium(III) iodide (2:1 molar ratio), which was supposed to lead to formation of a homoleptic tetraphenylethenide ate-complex Na[Sc(Ph4C2)2]. Anhydrous ScI3 was activated by refluxing in THF in order to destroy its polymeric structure. According to 1H NMR and UV-VIS spectral data, the final product after work-up contained expected Na[Sc(Ph4C2)2] and some unreacted Na2[Ph4C2]. Most likely, ScI3 coordination polymer was not fully converted into the monomer or short oligomers, therefore, the tetraphenylethylene dianion was not fully consumed. Attempts to grow crystals of the reaction product in various solvents and conditions allowed us to obtain only crystals of the title compound when diglyme was used as σ-donating chelating ligand. Analogous reactions of M2[Ph4C2] (M= Na, K) with LnCl3(thf)3 (Ln=Sc, Y, Lu), which have a molecular structure, go smoothly without any complications.

Crystal structure of free tetraphenylethylene is well known (see, for example, Hua et al., 2007). However, only three X-ray crystal structures of solvated dialkali metal tetraphenylethenides have been known up to date: {Na[Na(Ph4C2)(Et2O)2]}n (Bock et al., 1989); {[Cs(diglyme)]2[Ph4C2]} (Bock et al., 1996); {[K(dme)2]2[Ph4C2]} (Minyaev et al., 2007). There are interionic short contacts M+–Ph4C22- (M= Na, K, Cs) in all three crystal structures, which may have some impact on the C—C bond length redistribution inside the easily polarizable tetraphenylethylene dianion.

The title compound, [Na(diglyme)2]+2[Ph2CCPh2]2-, is the only example with separated counterions in crystalline lattice. Consequently, one may suppose that the C—C bond distances of the dianion are relatively unperturbed. However, some non-covalent interionic bonding is present. A three-dimensional framework is formed by C—Hdiglyme···CPh π-interactions (e.g., C14—H14A···C13, C15—H15A···C2, C17—H17B···C11, C22—H22A···η2-C10—C11, C23—H23A···η6-C2—C3—C4—C5—C6—C7) and by C—HPh···Odiglyme hydrogen bonds (C4—H4···O4). The asymmetric unit contains one cation [Na(diglyme)2]+ and a half of the dianion [Ph2CCPh2]2-. The center of the tetraphenylethylene former C–C double bond (C=–C=) lies on a 2-fold rotation axis. The dianion accommodates a twist conformation. The angle between two planes, formed by Cipso, C= and Cipso carbon atoms (C2—C1—C8 and C2i—C1i—C8i, respectively), equals to 82.4°. The C=–C= bond (atoms C1–C1i) is elongated up to a single bond (1.507 (3) Å, see table 1). Based on table 1, the C=–Cipso bond lengths are shorter and Cipso–Cortho — longer than those in free tetraphenylethylene. Averaged C—C bond distances inside the dianion are 1.434 Å (C=–Cipso), 1.432 Å (Cipso–Cortho), 1.382 Å (Cortho–Cmeta), 1.391 Å (Cmeta–Cpara). For comparison, the same C—C bond distances in free tetraphenylethylene (Hua et al., 2007) are 1.356 (2) Å (C=–C=), 1.494 Å (C=–Cipso), 1.397 Å (Cipso–Cortho), 1.388 Å (Cortho–Cmeta), 1.384 Å (Cmeta–Cpara).

The observed C—C bond length redistribution inside the dianion could be rationalized by localization of excessive negative charge predominantly not only at C= carbon atoms but also at all eight Cortho positions (see Fig.1).

Similar averaged C—C bond lengths in the Ph4C22- dianion can be found in {[Cs(diglyme)]2[Ph4C2]} (Bock et al., 1996) — 1.51 (1) Å (C=–C=), 1.436 Å (C=–Cipso), 1.423 Å (Cipso–Cortho), 1.387 Å (Cortho–Cmeta), 1.385 Å (Cmeta–Cpara), and in {[K(dme)2]2[Ph4C2]} (Minyaev et al., 2007) — 1.496 (2) Å (C=–C=), 1.433 Å (C=–Cipso), 1.430 Å (Cipso–Cortho), 1.384 Å (Cortho–Cmeta), 1.392 Å (Cmeta–Cpara). Therefore, M—Ph4C2 (M=K, Cs) short contacts do not introduce much influence on the C—C bond length redistribution, compared to that of the title compound with separated counterions.

In coordination polymer {Na[Na(Ph4C2)(Et2O)2]}n (Bock et al., 1989), the C=–C= bond length is 1.487 Å, but some similar C—C distances vary essentially. Thus, phenyl rings coordinated with Na+ and Na(Et2O)2+ moieties display the following averaged bond lengths: 1.463 Å (C=–Cipso), 1.444 Å (Cipso–Cortho), 1.397 Å (Cortho–Cmeta), 1.396 Å (Cmeta–Cpara). For phenyl rings that almost do not interact with the Na+ cation, the averaged C—C bond distances are 1.436 Å (C=–Cipso), 1.416 Å (Cipso–Cortho. Actual bond lengths are 1.407 Å, 1.423 Å for a one phenyl ring and 1.405 Å, 1.427 Å for another one.), 1.392 Å (Cortho–Cmeta), 1.391 Å (Cmeta–Cpara). It is obvious that excessive electron density of the dianion is not equally localized at ortho-positions of coordinated and uncoordinated phenyl groups, and charge redistribution inside the dianion is quite different from such of three previous salts. Impact on C—C bond distances could be partly explained by stronger polarizing ability of Na+, compared to K+ and Cs+.

It is worth mentioning that the angle between two Cipso—C=—Cipso planes decreases in the following order: [Na(diglyme)2]2[Ph2CCPh2] (82.4°), {[Cs(diglyme)]2[Ph4C2]} (75.5°), {[K(dme)2]2[Ph4C2]} (68.7°), {Na[Na(Ph4C2)(Et2O)2]}n (56.1°), which has a positive correlation with the M—Ph4C2 strength interaction (M=Na, K, Cs). The same angle is 8.8° in free Ph2C=CPh2.

The C—C bond length redistribution changes even more dramatically in crystalline lattice of rare-earth complexes due to higher polarizing ability of Ln3+ and Yb2+. The coordinated tetraphenylethelene dianion in rare-earth complexes exhibits bis-η3-allylic coordination mode, where the excessive negative charge of the dianion is localized at C= carbon atoms and only at two Cortho positions coordinated with the metal cation (Roitershtein et al., 1998; Roitershtein et al., 2004; Minyaev et al., 2007; Roitershtein et al., 2007).

Related literature top

For the crystal structure of free tetraphenylethylenide, see: Hua et al. (2007). For the preparation and reactivity of disodiumtetraphenylethylene, see: Schlenk & Bergmann (1928). For UV–VIS data, see: Roberts & Szwarc (1965). For 1H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra, see: Roitershtein et al. (1998). For crystal structures of related alkali-metal tetraphenylethylene salts, see: Bock et al. (1989, 1996); Minyaev et al. (2007). For crystal structures of hetero- and homoleptic d- and f-metal complexes with the tetraphenylethilene dianion, see: Roitershtein et al. (1998, 2004, 2007); Minyaev et al. (2007).

Experimental top

All synthetic manipulations were carried out under vacuum or argon atmosphere, using Schlenk glassware, dry box techniques and absolute solvents. A 250 ml flask with freshly cut sodium metal (0.60 g, 26 mmol) was evacuated. Sodium mirror was formed on the flask's walls upon heating under dynamic vacuum. Tetraphenylethylene solution in THF (1.249 g, 3.76 mmol in 100 ml) was added into the flask. The solution was stirred for 1 day, the color changed to purple (λmax= 485 nm). Simultaneously, anhydrous ScI3 (0.784 g, 1.84 mmol) was stirred for 5 h in THF (50 ml) and then refluxed for 2 h while stirring to form a finely divided suspension. The Na2[Ph4C2] solution was added dropwise into the ScI3 suspension. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 day. λmax of the reaction mixture = 422 nm (very br.), which is a superposition of 2 ligand to metal charge transfer absorption bands: 485 nm for Na2[Ph4C2] (Roberts & Szwarc, 1965) and 392 nm for Na[Sc(Ph4C2)2]. λmax did not change after 3 day of stirring. Then the reaction mixture was filtered, the filter cake and the flask were washed with THF (2x20 ml). Most THF was evaporated from the solution, leaving some solid and c.a. 20 ml of the solution. Pentane (c.a. 100 ml) was layered on a top of the solution. After 1 day, the mixture was stirred. Precipitate was filtered off, washed with pentane (2x20 ml) and with diethyl ether (2x20 ml), dried under vacuum for 4 h. The yield of crude product was 1.473 g.

To grow crystals of the title compound, the obtained crude product (150 mg) was dissolved in mixture of THF (20 ml) and diglyme (5 ml). Diethyl ether (35 ml) was layered on a top of the resulting solution. After 2 weeks, crystals formed on Schlenk tube's walls.

The 1H NMR spectrum of the crude product consisted of two sets of proton signals. The first set belongs to Na2[Ph4C2] (see Roitershtein et al., 1998). The second set corresponds to Na[Sc(Ph4C2)2] – 1H NMR (300 MHz, -30°C, THFd-8, δ, p.p.m.): 4.65 (dd, 4H), 6.29 (t, 4H), 6.58 (t, 4H), 6.87 (br.t, 12H), 7.07 (t, 4H), 7.14 (d, 8H), 7.65 (dd, 4H).

Based on qualitative analysis with xylenol orange indicator, the filter cake contained significant amounts of scandium.

Refinement top

The hydrogen atoms were positioned geometrically (C—H distance = 0.95 Å for aromatic, 0.98 Å for methyl, 0.99 Å for methylene protons) and refined as riding atoms with Uiso(H)= 1.5Ueq(C) for methyl protons, 1.2Ueq(C) for other protons. A rotating group model was applied for methyl groups. The studied crystal was a twin with a ratio of two major domains of 0.2143 (9): 0.7857 (9). The two domains were rotated from each other by 180.0° about a real axis (1 0 0), which was determined by Cell Now program (Sheldrick, 2003). The final refinement was carried out using detwinned data set.

Disorder of the C20—O4—C21—C22 cation fragment was not modeled, since the residual electron density was not sufficient to model the disorder properly.

Structure description top

Detailed preparation and reactivity of disodiumtetraphenylethylene were described by Schlenk & Bergmann (1928). Since then, properties of the tetraphenylethylene dianion and radical-anion have been intensively studied, including electronic spectra, 1H and 13C NMR spectral data, electrochemistry and etc. For example, ligand to metal charge transfer absorption band of the disodiumtetraphenylethylene in THF solution was reported by Roberts & Szwarc (1965); 1H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra of disodiumtetraphenylethylene in THFd-8 have been reported by Roitershtein et al. (1998).

Synthetic applications of the tetraphenylethylene dianion are remarkably few. Reactivity of the tetraphenylethylene dianion towards formation either d- or f-element complexes is not well established so far. Only five crystal structures of hetero- and homoleptic complexes of lanthanides and yttrium with the tetraphenylethylene dianion have been reported: [Na(thf)6]2[Y(Ph4C2)2](thf)2, (Roitershtein et al., 1998), [Na(diglyme)2][Lu(Ph4C2)2](thf)0.5 (Roitershtein et al., 2004), [Na(thf)3][Na(thf)4][Yb(Ph4C2)2] (Minyaev et al., 2007), [(C5H5)Lu(Ph4C2)(dme)](dme) (Roitershtein et al., 2004) (dme is 1,2-dimethoxyethane), [(1,3–Ph2C5H3)Lu(Ph4C2)(thf)] (Roitershtein et al., 2007).

As a part of our research project on synthesis and structural characterization of new tetraphenylethenide derivatives of rare-earth metals, we have explored reaction of disodiumtetraphenylethylene with anhydrous scandium(III) iodide (2:1 molar ratio), which was supposed to lead to formation of a homoleptic tetraphenylethenide ate-complex Na[Sc(Ph4C2)2]. Anhydrous ScI3 was activated by refluxing in THF in order to destroy its polymeric structure. According to 1H NMR and UV-VIS spectral data, the final product after work-up contained expected Na[Sc(Ph4C2)2] and some unreacted Na2[Ph4C2]. Most likely, ScI3 coordination polymer was not fully converted into the monomer or short oligomers, therefore, the tetraphenylethylene dianion was not fully consumed. Attempts to grow crystals of the reaction product in various solvents and conditions allowed us to obtain only crystals of the title compound when diglyme was used as σ-donating chelating ligand. Analogous reactions of M2[Ph4C2] (M= Na, K) with LnCl3(thf)3 (Ln=Sc, Y, Lu), which have a molecular structure, go smoothly without any complications.

Crystal structure of free tetraphenylethylene is well known (see, for example, Hua et al., 2007). However, only three X-ray crystal structures of solvated dialkali metal tetraphenylethenides have been known up to date: {Na[Na(Ph4C2)(Et2O)2]}n (Bock et al., 1989); {[Cs(diglyme)]2[Ph4C2]} (Bock et al., 1996); {[K(dme)2]2[Ph4C2]} (Minyaev et al., 2007). There are interionic short contacts M+–Ph4C22- (M= Na, K, Cs) in all three crystal structures, which may have some impact on the C—C bond length redistribution inside the easily polarizable tetraphenylethylene dianion.

The title compound, [Na(diglyme)2]+2[Ph2CCPh2]2-, is the only example with separated counterions in crystalline lattice. Consequently, one may suppose that the C—C bond distances of the dianion are relatively unperturbed. However, some non-covalent interionic bonding is present. A three-dimensional framework is formed by C—Hdiglyme···CPh π-interactions (e.g., C14—H14A···C13, C15—H15A···C2, C17—H17B···C11, C22—H22A···η2-C10—C11, C23—H23A···η6-C2—C3—C4—C5—C6—C7) and by C—HPh···Odiglyme hydrogen bonds (C4—H4···O4). The asymmetric unit contains one cation [Na(diglyme)2]+ and a half of the dianion [Ph2CCPh2]2-. The center of the tetraphenylethylene former C–C double bond (C=–C=) lies on a 2-fold rotation axis. The dianion accommodates a twist conformation. The angle between two planes, formed by Cipso, C= and Cipso carbon atoms (C2—C1—C8 and C2i—C1i—C8i, respectively), equals to 82.4°. The C=–C= bond (atoms C1–C1i) is elongated up to a single bond (1.507 (3) Å, see table 1). Based on table 1, the C=–Cipso bond lengths are shorter and Cipso–Cortho — longer than those in free tetraphenylethylene. Averaged C—C bond distances inside the dianion are 1.434 Å (C=–Cipso), 1.432 Å (Cipso–Cortho), 1.382 Å (Cortho–Cmeta), 1.391 Å (Cmeta–Cpara). For comparison, the same C—C bond distances in free tetraphenylethylene (Hua et al., 2007) are 1.356 (2) Å (C=–C=), 1.494 Å (C=–Cipso), 1.397 Å (Cipso–Cortho), 1.388 Å (Cortho–Cmeta), 1.384 Å (Cmeta–Cpara).

The observed C—C bond length redistribution inside the dianion could be rationalized by localization of excessive negative charge predominantly not only at C= carbon atoms but also at all eight Cortho positions (see Fig.1).

Similar averaged C—C bond lengths in the Ph4C22- dianion can be found in {[Cs(diglyme)]2[Ph4C2]} (Bock et al., 1996) — 1.51 (1) Å (C=–C=), 1.436 Å (C=–Cipso), 1.423 Å (Cipso–Cortho), 1.387 Å (Cortho–Cmeta), 1.385 Å (Cmeta–Cpara), and in {[K(dme)2]2[Ph4C2]} (Minyaev et al., 2007) — 1.496 (2) Å (C=–C=), 1.433 Å (C=–Cipso), 1.430 Å (Cipso–Cortho), 1.384 Å (Cortho–Cmeta), 1.392 Å (Cmeta–Cpara). Therefore, M—Ph4C2 (M=K, Cs) short contacts do not introduce much influence on the C—C bond length redistribution, compared to that of the title compound with separated counterions.

In coordination polymer {Na[Na(Ph4C2)(Et2O)2]}n (Bock et al., 1989), the C=–C= bond length is 1.487 Å, but some similar C—C distances vary essentially. Thus, phenyl rings coordinated with Na+ and Na(Et2O)2+ moieties display the following averaged bond lengths: 1.463 Å (C=–Cipso), 1.444 Å (Cipso–Cortho), 1.397 Å (Cortho–Cmeta), 1.396 Å (Cmeta–Cpara). For phenyl rings that almost do not interact with the Na+ cation, the averaged C—C bond distances are 1.436 Å (C=–Cipso), 1.416 Å (Cipso–Cortho. Actual bond lengths are 1.407 Å, 1.423 Å for a one phenyl ring and 1.405 Å, 1.427 Å for another one.), 1.392 Å (Cortho–Cmeta), 1.391 Å (Cmeta–Cpara). It is obvious that excessive electron density of the dianion is not equally localized at ortho-positions of coordinated and uncoordinated phenyl groups, and charge redistribution inside the dianion is quite different from such of three previous salts. Impact on C—C bond distances could be partly explained by stronger polarizing ability of Na+, compared to K+ and Cs+.

It is worth mentioning that the angle between two Cipso—C=—Cipso planes decreases in the following order: [Na(diglyme)2]2[Ph2CCPh2] (82.4°), {[Cs(diglyme)]2[Ph4C2]} (75.5°), {[K(dme)2]2[Ph4C2]} (68.7°), {Na[Na(Ph4C2)(Et2O)2]}n (56.1°), which has a positive correlation with the M—Ph4C2 strength interaction (M=Na, K, Cs). The same angle is 8.8° in free Ph2C=CPh2.

The C—C bond length redistribution changes even more dramatically in crystalline lattice of rare-earth complexes due to higher polarizing ability of Ln3+ and Yb2+. The coordinated tetraphenylethelene dianion in rare-earth complexes exhibits bis-η3-allylic coordination mode, where the excessive negative charge of the dianion is localized at C= carbon atoms and only at two Cortho positions coordinated with the metal cation (Roitershtein et al., 1998; Roitershtein et al., 2004; Minyaev et al., 2007; Roitershtein et al., 2007).

For the crystal structure of free tetraphenylethylenide, see: Hua et al. (2007). For the preparation and reactivity of disodiumtetraphenylethylene, see: Schlenk & Bergmann (1928). For UV–VIS data, see: Roberts & Szwarc (1965). For 1H and 13C{1H} NMR spectra, see: Roitershtein et al. (1998). For crystal structures of related alkali-metal tetraphenylethylene salts, see: Bock et al. (1989, 1996); Minyaev et al. (2007). For crystal structures of hetero- and homoleptic d- and f-metal complexes with the tetraphenylethilene dianion, see: Roitershtein et al. (1998, 2004, 2007); Minyaev et al. (2007).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2003); cell refinement: CELL_NOW (Sheldrick, 2003) and SAINT (Bruker, 2003); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2003); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS2012 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2012 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Bruker, 2003); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL2012 (Sheldrick, 2008) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Some of possible resonance forms, showing charge redistribution among one C= and two Cortho positions.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Molecular structure of [Na(diglyme)2]+2[Ph2CCPh2]2- (50% atomic displacement parameters). One cation is shown. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Symmetry code: (i) -x + 1, y, -z + 1/2.
Bis{bis[1-methoxy-2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethane-κ3O,O',O'']sodium} 1,1,2,2-tetraphenylethane-1,2-diide top
Crystal data top
[Na(C6H14O3)2]2(C26H20)F(000) = 1976
Mr = 915.08Dx = 1.195 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 10.048 (2) ÅCell parameters from 4057 reflections
b = 24.165 (5) Åθ = 2.2–28.2°
c = 20.978 (4) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
β = 92.92 (3)°T = 123 K
V = 5087.0 (18) Å3Block, red
Z = 40.50 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm
Data collection top
Siemens SMART Platform CCD
diffractometer
6286 independent reflections
Radiation source: normal-focus sealed tube5347 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.0
area detector, ω scans per phiθmax = 28.3°, θmin = 1.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(TWINABS; Bruker, 2003)
h = 1313
Tmin = 0.657, Tmax = 0.746k = 032
6286 measured reflectionsl = 027
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.048Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.115H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0435P)2 + 4.6083P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
6286 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
294 parametersΔρmax = 0.42 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.23 e Å3
Crystal data top
[Na(C6H14O3)2]2(C26H20)V = 5087.0 (18) Å3
Mr = 915.08Z = 4
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 10.048 (2) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
b = 24.165 (5) ÅT = 123 K
c = 20.978 (4) Å0.50 × 0.30 × 0.20 mm
β = 92.92 (3)°
Data collection top
Siemens SMART Platform CCD
diffractometer
6286 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(TWINABS; Bruker, 2003)
5347 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.657, Tmax = 0.746Rint = 0.0
6286 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0480 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.115H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06Δρmax = 0.42 e Å3
6286 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.23 e Å3
294 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. moisture and air sensitive

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. Refined as a 2-component twin. BASF=0.214

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.42755 (17)0.13927 (7)0.25769 (8)0.0214 (3)
C20.38922 (17)0.17452 (7)0.30886 (8)0.0219 (3)
C30.47563 (19)0.21800 (7)0.33076 (8)0.0251 (4)
H30.55760.22280.31080.030*
C40.4459 (2)0.25360 (8)0.37973 (9)0.0326 (4)
H40.50620.28250.39150.039*
C50.3292 (2)0.24769 (9)0.41196 (9)0.0379 (5)
H50.30840.27230.44530.045*
C60.2442 (2)0.20449 (9)0.39376 (9)0.0346 (4)
H60.16540.19900.41620.042*
C70.27099 (19)0.16925 (8)0.34386 (8)0.0273 (4)
H70.20910.14070.33250.033*
C80.33820 (18)0.10525 (7)0.21972 (8)0.0221 (3)
C90.3903 (2)0.06401 (7)0.17867 (9)0.0276 (4)
H90.48420.05980.17790.033*
C100.3100 (2)0.03023 (8)0.14016 (9)0.0343 (4)
H100.35000.00330.11420.041*
C110.1720 (2)0.03466 (9)0.13839 (10)0.0383 (5)
H110.11700.01090.11240.046*
C120.1172 (2)0.07532 (9)0.17626 (10)0.0344 (5)
H120.02320.07970.17510.041*
C130.19548 (19)0.10935 (8)0.21528 (9)0.0271 (4)
H130.15350.13650.24010.032*
Na10.19803 (8)0.37669 (3)0.10184 (3)0.03106 (18)
C140.0899 (3)0.25199 (9)0.14723 (13)0.0545 (7)
H14A0.12550.21590.16100.082*
H14B0.06790.25120.10120.082*
H14C0.00930.26010.17000.082*
O10.18706 (16)0.29378 (6)0.16114 (6)0.0393 (4)
C150.2176 (2)0.29889 (11)0.22790 (10)0.0453 (6)
H15A0.25900.26440.24480.054*
H15B0.13520.30580.25060.054*
C160.3109 (2)0.34577 (12)0.23745 (10)0.0499 (6)
H16A0.33460.35080.28350.060*
H16B0.39360.33870.21510.060*
O20.24528 (15)0.39425 (7)0.21202 (7)0.0409 (4)
C170.3210 (3)0.44350 (13)0.21969 (12)0.0576 (7)
H17A0.41230.43750.20550.069*
H17B0.32710.45460.26520.069*
C180.2538 (3)0.48737 (10)0.18068 (13)0.0573 (7)
H18A0.16060.49180.19300.069*
H18B0.30060.52310.18760.069*
O30.25612 (17)0.47153 (6)0.11525 (8)0.0458 (4)
C190.2039 (4)0.51249 (11)0.07319 (17)0.0764 (9)
H19A0.25050.54750.08170.115*
H19B0.10860.51730.07960.115*
H19C0.21610.50110.02900.115*
C200.4897 (3)0.40361 (14)0.03195 (17)0.0767 (10)
H20A0.57340.38340.02820.115*
H20B0.49850.42920.06810.115*
H20C0.46920.42450.00740.115*
O40.38983 (16)0.36721 (7)0.04155 (8)0.0476 (4)
C210.3632 (3)0.32886 (12)0.00971 (13)0.0573 (7)
H21A0.35940.29080.00760.069*
H21B0.43650.33030.03950.069*
C220.2354 (2)0.34211 (10)0.04470 (10)0.0403 (5)
H22A0.24010.37920.06460.048*
H22B0.21600.31450.07880.048*
O50.13343 (14)0.34110 (6)0.00064 (6)0.0321 (3)
C230.01609 (19)0.36844 (9)0.02316 (9)0.0316 (4)
H23A0.01790.35100.06350.038*
H23B0.03530.40790.03170.038*
C240.0849 (2)0.36364 (10)0.02655 (10)0.0368 (5)
H24A0.16960.38120.01110.044*
H24B0.10260.32420.03550.044*
O60.03470 (15)0.39049 (6)0.08320 (7)0.0360 (3)
C250.1223 (3)0.38392 (10)0.13393 (11)0.0484 (6)
H25A0.20670.40280.12300.073*
H25B0.08130.40000.17310.073*
H25C0.13900.34440.14070.073*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0197 (8)0.0234 (8)0.0211 (8)0.0002 (7)0.0015 (6)0.0031 (6)
C20.0211 (8)0.0239 (8)0.0205 (8)0.0045 (7)0.0005 (6)0.0062 (6)
C30.0286 (9)0.0264 (9)0.0203 (8)0.0018 (7)0.0025 (7)0.0014 (7)
C40.0408 (11)0.0292 (10)0.0277 (9)0.0020 (8)0.0006 (8)0.0026 (8)
C50.0461 (13)0.0394 (11)0.0286 (10)0.0145 (10)0.0071 (9)0.0055 (8)
C60.0293 (10)0.0475 (12)0.0279 (9)0.0123 (9)0.0088 (8)0.0050 (8)
C70.0239 (9)0.0338 (9)0.0242 (8)0.0032 (7)0.0025 (7)0.0055 (7)
C80.0246 (9)0.0210 (8)0.0207 (8)0.0023 (7)0.0001 (7)0.0072 (6)
C90.0327 (10)0.0241 (9)0.0257 (9)0.0016 (7)0.0008 (7)0.0023 (7)
C100.0478 (12)0.0259 (9)0.0287 (9)0.0052 (9)0.0019 (9)0.0007 (7)
C110.0459 (13)0.0334 (10)0.0344 (10)0.0174 (9)0.0115 (9)0.0032 (8)
C120.0259 (10)0.0419 (11)0.0346 (10)0.0100 (9)0.0060 (8)0.0123 (9)
C130.0257 (9)0.0286 (9)0.0266 (9)0.0013 (7)0.0006 (7)0.0073 (7)
Na10.0402 (4)0.0287 (4)0.0236 (3)0.0006 (3)0.0053 (3)0.0037 (3)
C140.086 (2)0.0275 (11)0.0514 (14)0.0008 (12)0.0215 (14)0.0041 (10)
O10.0509 (9)0.0384 (8)0.0292 (7)0.0107 (7)0.0063 (7)0.0061 (6)
C150.0422 (13)0.0667 (15)0.0274 (10)0.0218 (12)0.0066 (9)0.0130 (10)
C160.0314 (12)0.0934 (19)0.0245 (10)0.0162 (12)0.0013 (8)0.0027 (11)
O20.0330 (8)0.0578 (9)0.0316 (7)0.0016 (7)0.0030 (6)0.0143 (7)
C170.0473 (14)0.0851 (19)0.0401 (12)0.0176 (14)0.0006 (11)0.0301 (13)
C180.0553 (15)0.0454 (13)0.0728 (17)0.0110 (12)0.0181 (14)0.0372 (13)
O30.0510 (10)0.0311 (7)0.0546 (9)0.0033 (7)0.0039 (8)0.0116 (7)
C190.093 (2)0.0369 (14)0.099 (2)0.0093 (15)0.008 (2)0.0144 (15)
C200.075 (2)0.0665 (19)0.092 (2)0.0355 (16)0.0292 (18)0.0306 (17)
O40.0354 (8)0.0539 (10)0.0535 (10)0.0069 (7)0.0021 (7)0.0270 (8)
C210.0390 (13)0.0708 (18)0.0615 (16)0.0057 (12)0.0025 (12)0.0355 (14)
C220.0356 (12)0.0547 (13)0.0308 (10)0.0024 (10)0.0043 (8)0.0084 (9)
O50.0291 (7)0.0430 (8)0.0240 (6)0.0017 (6)0.0002 (5)0.0018 (6)
C230.0302 (10)0.0405 (11)0.0237 (9)0.0031 (8)0.0026 (7)0.0000 (8)
C240.0314 (11)0.0467 (12)0.0325 (10)0.0039 (9)0.0025 (8)0.0009 (9)
O60.0396 (8)0.0414 (8)0.0277 (7)0.0008 (6)0.0075 (6)0.0005 (6)
C250.0632 (16)0.0432 (12)0.0411 (12)0.0041 (11)0.0258 (12)0.0012 (10)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—C1i1.507 (3)C15—H15A0.9900
C1—C21.438 (2)C15—H15B0.9900
C1—C81.429 (2)C16—O21.434 (3)
C2—C31.424 (3)C16—H16A0.9900
C2—C71.434 (3)C16—H16B0.9900
C3—C41.384 (3)O2—C171.417 (3)
C3—H30.9500C17—C181.481 (4)
C4—C51.390 (3)C17—H17A0.9900
C4—H40.9500C17—H17B0.9900
C5—C61.390 (3)C18—O31.426 (3)
C5—H50.9500C18—H18A0.9900
C6—C71.387 (3)C18—H18B0.9900
C6—H60.9500O3—C191.410 (3)
C7—H70.9500C19—H19A0.9800
C8—C91.433 (3)C19—H19B0.9800
C8—C131.436 (3)C19—H19C0.9800
C9—C101.380 (3)C20—O41.357 (3)
C9—H90.9500C20—H20A0.9800
C10—C111.389 (3)C20—H20B0.9800
C10—H100.9500C20—H20C0.9800
C11—C121.394 (3)O4—C211.434 (3)
C11—H110.9500C21—C221.481 (3)
C12—C131.378 (3)C21—H21A0.9900
C12—H120.9500C21—H21B0.9900
C13—H130.9500C22—O51.434 (2)
Na1—O52.3510 (16)C22—H22A0.9900
Na1—O12.3639 (16)C22—H22B0.9900
Na1—O42.3694 (19)O5—C231.420 (2)
Na1—O22.3742 (16)C23—C241.496 (3)
Na1—O62.3747 (18)C23—H23A0.9900
Na1—O32.3781 (17)C23—H23B0.9900
Na1—C163.100 (2)C24—O61.424 (3)
Na1—C233.126 (2)C24—H24A0.9900
C14—O11.425 (3)C24—H24B0.9900
C14—H14A0.9800O6—C251.424 (3)
C14—H14B0.9800C25—H25A0.9800
C14—H14C0.9800C25—H25B0.9800
O1—C151.424 (3)C25—H25C0.9800
C15—C161.478 (4)
C8—C1—C2124.90 (16)O2—C16—Na147.30 (8)
C8—C1—C1i117.83 (15)C15—C16—Na181.98 (12)
C2—C1—C1i117.26 (15)O2—C16—H16A110.2
C3—C2—C7114.07 (16)C15—C16—H16A110.2
C3—C2—C1119.72 (15)Na1—C16—H16A157.5
C7—C2—C1126.15 (16)O2—C16—H16B110.2
C4—C3—C2123.15 (17)C15—C16—H16B110.2
C4—C3—H3118.4Na1—C16—H16B83.3
C2—C3—H3118.4H16A—C16—H16B108.5
C3—C4—C5121.09 (19)C17—O2—C16114.22 (19)
C3—C4—H4119.5C17—O2—Na1109.88 (13)
C5—C4—H4119.5C16—O2—Na1106.35 (12)
C4—C5—C6117.74 (18)O2—C17—C18108.2 (2)
C4—C5—H5121.1O2—C17—H17A110.1
C6—C5—H5121.1C18—C17—H17A110.1
C7—C6—C5121.88 (19)O2—C17—H17B110.1
C7—C6—H6119.1C18—C17—H17B110.1
C5—C6—H6119.1H17A—C17—H17B108.4
C6—C7—C2122.00 (18)O3—C18—C17108.06 (19)
C6—C7—H7119.0O3—C18—H18A110.1
C2—C7—H7119.0C17—C18—H18A110.1
C1—C8—C9119.78 (16)O3—C18—H18B110.1
C1—C8—C13126.40 (17)C17—C18—H18B110.1
C9—C8—C13113.75 (16)H18A—C18—H18B108.4
C10—C9—C8122.88 (19)C19—O3—C18112.9 (2)
C10—C9—H9118.6C19—O3—Na1121.42 (17)
C8—C9—H9118.6C18—O3—Na1110.89 (14)
C9—C10—C11121.5 (2)O3—C19—H19A109.5
C9—C10—H10119.2O3—C19—H19B109.5
C11—C10—H10119.2H19A—C19—H19B109.5
C10—C11—C12117.48 (18)O3—C19—H19C109.5
C10—C11—H11121.3H19A—C19—H19C109.5
C12—C11—H11121.3H19B—C19—H19C109.5
C13—C12—C11121.95 (19)O4—C20—H20A109.5
C13—C12—H12119.0O4—C20—H20B109.5
C11—C12—H12119.0H20A—C20—H20B109.5
C12—C13—C8122.37 (19)O4—C20—H20C109.5
C12—C13—H13118.8H20A—C20—H20C109.5
C8—C13—H13118.8H20B—C20—H20C109.5
O5—Na1—O198.46 (6)C20—O4—C21114.7 (2)
O5—Na1—O471.18 (6)C20—O4—Na1130.10 (17)
O1—Na1—O4105.07 (7)C21—O4—Na1109.70 (14)
O5—Na1—O2167.64 (6)O4—C21—C22110.8 (2)
O1—Na1—O269.60 (6)O4—C21—H21A109.5
O4—Na1—O2114.15 (7)C22—C21—H21A109.5
O5—Na1—O671.24 (6)O4—C21—H21B109.5
O1—Na1—O697.69 (6)C22—C21—H21B109.5
O4—Na1—O6138.30 (6)H21A—C21—H21B108.1
O2—Na1—O6106.35 (6)O5—C22—C21107.37 (18)
O5—Na1—O3120.94 (6)O5—C22—H22A110.2
O1—Na1—O3140.56 (6)C21—C22—H22A110.2
O4—Na1—O387.41 (6)O5—C22—H22B110.2
O2—Na1—O371.15 (6)C21—C22—H22B110.2
O6—Na1—O396.77 (6)H22A—C22—H22B108.5
O5—Na1—C16144.27 (7)C23—O5—C22111.57 (15)
O1—Na1—C1648.50 (7)C23—O5—Na1109.48 (11)
O4—Na1—C16101.37 (7)C22—O5—Na1114.77 (12)
O2—Na1—C1626.35 (6)O5—C23—C24107.43 (16)
O6—Na1—C16119.74 (6)O5—C23—Na145.17 (8)
O3—Na1—C1692.73 (7)C24—C23—Na178.98 (11)
O5—Na1—C2325.36 (5)O5—C23—H23A110.2
O1—Na1—C23110.27 (6)C24—C23—H23A110.2
O4—Na1—C2390.17 (6)Na1—C23—H23A154.8
O2—Na1—C23155.18 (6)O5—C23—H23B110.2
O6—Na1—C2348.84 (5)C24—C23—H23B110.2
O3—Na1—C23106.88 (6)Na1—C23—H23B88.8
C16—Na1—C23157.75 (7)H23A—C23—H23B108.5
O1—C14—H14A109.5O6—C24—C23108.80 (17)
O1—C14—H14B109.5O6—C24—H24A109.9
H14A—C14—H14B109.5C23—C24—H24A109.9
O1—C14—H14C109.5O6—C24—H24B109.9
H14A—C14—H14C109.5C23—C24—H24B109.9
H14B—C14—H14C109.5H24A—C24—H24B108.3
C15—O1—C14111.96 (18)C24—O6—C25111.52 (18)
C15—O1—Na1115.51 (14)C24—O6—Na1112.19 (12)
C14—O1—Na1122.87 (14)C25—O6—Na1120.14 (14)
O1—C15—C16107.65 (18)O6—C25—H25A109.5
O1—C15—H15A110.2O6—C25—H25B109.5
C16—C15—H15A110.2H25A—C25—H25B109.5
O1—C15—H15B110.2O6—C25—H25C109.5
C16—C15—H15B110.2H25A—C25—H25C109.5
H15A—C15—H15B108.5H25B—C25—H25C109.5
O2—C16—C15107.43 (17)
C8—C1—C2—C3161.55 (16)C14—O1—C15—C16175.81 (19)
C1i—C1—C2—C317.1 (2)Na1—O1—C15—C1628.6 (2)
C8—C1—C2—C721.4 (3)O1—C15—C16—O259.8 (2)
C1i—C1—C2—C7159.90 (15)O1—C15—C16—Na119.41 (14)
C7—C2—C3—C42.6 (2)C15—C16—O2—C17177.87 (18)
C1—C2—C3—C4179.96 (17)Na1—C16—O2—C17121.37 (18)
C2—C3—C4—C51.8 (3)C15—C16—O2—Na160.75 (18)
C3—C4—C5—C60.6 (3)C16—O2—C17—C18169.02 (18)
C4—C5—C6—C72.1 (3)Na1—O2—C17—C1849.6 (2)
C5—C6—C7—C21.3 (3)O2—C17—C18—O364.0 (3)
C3—C2—C7—C61.1 (2)C17—C18—O3—C19175.3 (2)
C1—C2—C7—C6178.24 (17)C17—C18—O3—Na144.6 (2)
C2—C1—C8—C9167.86 (16)C20—O4—C21—C22108.3 (3)
C1i—C1—C8—C913.5 (2)Na1—O4—C21—C2248.4 (3)
C2—C1—C8—C1315.4 (3)O4—C21—C22—O557.4 (3)
C1i—C1—C8—C13163.26 (15)C21—C22—O5—C23162.93 (18)
C1—C8—C9—C10179.18 (17)C21—C22—O5—Na137.7 (2)
C13—C8—C9—C102.1 (2)C22—O5—C23—C24178.34 (17)
C8—C9—C10—C110.7 (3)Na1—O5—C23—C2453.51 (18)
C9—C10—C11—C121.1 (3)C22—O5—C23—Na1128.15 (18)
C10—C11—C12—C131.4 (3)O5—C23—C24—O661.5 (2)
C11—C12—C13—C80.1 (3)Na1—C23—C24—O626.01 (14)
C1—C8—C13—C12178.66 (17)C23—C24—O6—C25175.77 (18)
C9—C8—C13—C121.8 (2)C23—C24—O6—Na137.7 (2)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z+1/2.
Selected bond lengths (Å) top
C1—C1i1.507 (3)C6—C71.387 (3)
C1—C21.438 (2)C8—C91.433 (3)
C1—C81.429 (2)C8—C131.436 (3)
C2—C31.424 (3)C9—C101.380 (3)
C2—C71.434 (3)C10—C111.389 (3)
C3—C41.384 (3)C11—C121.394 (3)
C4—C51.390 (3)C12—C131.378 (3)
C5—C61.390 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z+1/2.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the US National Science Foundation (grant CHE-0841014) for financial support and to Victor Young, Jr, Director of the X-ray Crystallographic Facility at the University of Minnesota.

References

First citationBock, H., Hauck, T. & Näther, C. (1996). Organometallics, 15, 1527–1529.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBock, H., Ruppert, K. & Fenske, D. (1989). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 28, 1685–1688.  CSD CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2003). SMART, SAINT and TWINABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationHua, G., Li, Ya., Slawin, A. M. Z. & Woollins, J. D. (2007). Dalton Trans. pp. 1477–1480.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationMinyaev, M. E., Lyssenko, K. A., Belyakov, P. A., Antipin, M. Yu. & Roitershtein, D. M. (2007). Mendeleev Commun. 17, 102–104.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationRoberts, R. C. & Szwarc, M. (1965). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 87, 5542–5548.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationRoitershtein, D. M., Minyaev, M. E., Lyssenko, K. A., Belyakov, P. A. & Antipin, M. Yu. (2004). Russ. Chem. Bull. Int. Ed. 53, 2152–2161.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationRoitershtein, D. M., Minyaev, M. E., Mikhailyuk, A. A., Lyssenko, K. A., Belyakov, P. A. & Antipin, M. Yu. (2007). Russ. Chem. Bull. Int. Ed. 56, 1978–1985.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationRoitershtein, D. M., Ziller, J. W. & Evans, W. J. (1998). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 11342–11346.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationSchlenk, W. & Bergmann, E. (1928). Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 463, 1–97.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2003). CELL-NOW. University of Göttingen, Germany.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds