research communications
4(CH3OH)2]n
of [NiHg(SCN)aInstitute for Chemical Technologies and Analytics, Division of Structural Chemistry, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9/164-SC, A-1060 Vienna, Austria
*Correspondence e-mail: mweil@mail.zserv.tuwien.ac.at
The title compound, catena-poly[[bis(methanol-κO)nickel(II)]-di-μ-thiocyanato-κ4N:S-mercurate(II)-di-μ-thiocyanato-κ4N:S], was obtained from a gel-growth method using tetramethoxysilane as gelling agent. The is composed of rather regular HgS4 tetrahedra (point group symmetry .2.) and trans-NiN4O2 octahedra (point group symmetry 2..) that are linked through thiocyanato bridges into a three-dimensional framework. The methanol molecules coordinate via the O atom to the Ni2+ cations and point into the voids of this arrangement while a weak O—H⋯S hydrogen bond to an adjacent S atom stabilizes it.
Keywords: crystal structure; NLO materials; gel growth; nickel; mercury.
CCDC reference: 1004260
1. Chemical context
Compounds of the type MHg(SCN)4 (M is a divalent transition metal) exhibit interesting physical properties. For example, CoHg(SCN)4 is a calibrant for measurements using the Faraday method (Brown et al., 1977), and representatives with M = Fe, Mn, Zn and Cd show second-order non-linear optical (NLO) properties (Bergman et al., 1970; Yan et al., 1999).
Most of the MHg(SCN)4 compounds have been structurally characterized, including MnHg(SCN)4, FeHg(SCN)4 (Yan et al., 1999), CoHg(SCN)4 (Jeffery & Rose, 1968), CuHg(SCN)4 (Porai Koshits, 1963; Khandar et al., 2011), ZnHg(SCN)4 (Xu et al., 1999) and CdHg(SCN)4 (Iizuka & Sudo, 1968). The of NiHg(SCN)4 has not been reported up to now, and only the structures of the related hydrous phase [NiHg(SCN)4(H2O)2]n (Porai Koshits, 1960) and of the mercury-richer phase NiHg2(SCN)6 (Iizuka, 1978) have been determined.
In an attempt to grow crystals of the desired compound NiHg(SCN)4 using a gel-growth method (Henisch, 1996), starting from TMOS (tetramethoxysilane) as gelling agent, we obtained the title compound, [NiHg(SCN)4(CH3OH)2]n viz. a methanol-containing phase, instead. Methanol is generated during the gelling process of the silicate-based material according to the idealized reaction (H3CO)4Si + 4 H2O → 4 H4SiO4 + 4 H3COH and then becomes part of the crystal structure.
2. Structural commentary
The basic structure units of [NiHg(SCN)4(CH3OH)2]n are HgS4 tetrahedra (point group symmetry .2.) and trans-NiN4O2 octahedra (point group symmetry 2..) that are linked through the bridging thiocyanate anions into a three-dimensional framework structure (Fig. 1). The Hg—S bond lengths [mean 2.552 (3) Å; Table 1] are in very good agreement compared with those of HgS4 tetrahedra in the above-mentioned solvent-free MHg(SCN)4 structures, which have a mean of 2.57 (5) Å. The trans-NiN4O2 octahedra are defined by four N atoms belonging to four bridging thiocyanate anions and by two O atoms of isolated methanol molecules. The displacement parameters of the methanol molecule are rather high. The methanol molecule has relatively much space for libration, because it is not part of the framework structure and points into the remaining free space. Thus the displacement ellipsoids of the methanol O and especially of the C atom are enlarged (Fig. 1). Moreover, there is only a weak hydrogen-bonding interaction to an adjacent S atom that stabilizes this arrangement (Table 2).
|
[NiHg(SCN)4(CH3OH)2]n and [NiHg(SCN)4(H2O)2]n have a similar composition. Although the basic structure units (HgS4 tetrahedra and trans-NiN4O2 octahedra linked by thiocyanate bridges) are the same, the corresponding crystal structures are markedly different. The methanol-containing structure has tetragonal symmetry and is non-centrosymmetric, the water-containing structure has monoclinic symmetry and is centrosymmetric (space group C2/c). Whereas in the water-containing structure the HgS4 and NiN4O2 polyhedra are alternately arranged in layers parallel to (001) (Fig. 2), the arrangement in the methanol-containing compound is markedly different (Fig. 1).
The common structural motif in the above-mentioned MHg(SCN)4 compounds is the linkage of MN4 units (planar configuration for Cu and tetrahedral for all other M members) and tetrahedral HgS4 units through thiocyanate bridges. It seems that a of four is not favoured for structures with M = Ni. In the structures of [NiHg(SCN)4(CH3OH)2]n, [NiHg(SCN)4(H2O)2]n and NiHg2(SCN)6, the Ni2+ ions all have coordination numbers of six, which is probably the reason why a compound with composition NiHg(SCN)4 (most probably requiring a [4]-coordination for Ni2+) has not yet been isolated.
3. Synthesis and crystallization
Hg(SCN)2 was prepared by adding stoichiometric amounts of KSCN to a slightly acidified aqueous solution of Hg(NO3)2. The colourless precipitate was filtered off, washed with water and dried.
For the gel-growth experiment, 1.2 g Ni(NO3)2·6H2O and 1.2 g NH4SCN were dissolved in 20 ml water. To this solution, 0.5 g freshly prepared Hg(SCN)2 was slowly added until complete dissolution. Then 2 ml TMOS was added dropwise under stirring. Gelling time was about 3 h. After one week, blue single crystals of the title compound up to 5 mm in length had formed in the gel matrix.
4. Refinement
The H atom of the methanol hydroxy group was located from a difference map and was refined with a distance restraint of 0.90 (1) Å. The H atoms associated with the methyl group of the methanol molecule could not be located from difference Fourier maps. As a result of the high libration of this molecule, it seems probable that the methyl H atoms are disordered and were therefore refined with two positions with half-occupancy and rotated by 60 degrees. Ueq of these H atoms were set 1.5Uiso of the parent C atom. The remaining maximum and minimum electron densities are found 0.36 and 0.06 Å, respectively, from atom O1. Reflection (011) was affected by the beamstop and was discarded from the Experimental details are given in Table 3.
|
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 1004260
10.1107/S1600536814009532/hb0003sup1.cif
contains datablocks I, global. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814009532/hb0003Isup2.hkl
Compounds of the type MHg(SCN)4 (M is a divalent transition metal) exhibit interesting physical properties. For example, CoHg(SCN)4 is a calibrant for
measurements using the Faraday method (Brown et al., 1977), and representatives with M = Fe, Mn, Zn and Cd show second-order non-linear optical (NLO) properties (Bergman et al., 1970; Yan et al., 1999).Most of the MHg(SCN)4 compounds have been structurally characterized, including MnHg(SCN)4, FeHg(SCN)4 (Yan et al., 1999), CoHg(SCN)4 (Jeffery & Rose, 1968), CuHg(SCN)4 (Porai Koshits, 1963; Khandar et al., 2011), ZnHg(SCN)4 (Xu et al., 1999) and CdHg(SCN)4 (Iizuka & Sudo, 1968). The
of NiHg(SCN)4 has not been reported up to now, and only the structures of the related hydrous phase [NiHg(SCN)4(H2O)2]n (Porai Koshits, 1960) and of the mercury-richer phase NiHg2(SCN)6 (Iizuka, 1978) have been determined.In an attempt to grow crystals of the desired compound NiHg(SCN)4 using a gel-growth method (Henisch, 1996), starting from TMOS (tetramethoxysilane) as gelling agent, we obtained the title compound, [NiHg(SCN)4(CH3OH)2]n viz. a methanol-containing phase, instead. Methanol is generated during the gelling process of the silicate-based material according to the idealized reaction (H3CO)4Si + 4 H2O → 4 H4SiO4 + 4 H3COH and then becomes part of the crystal structure.
The basic structure units of [NiHg(SCN)4(CH3OH)2]n are HgS4 tetrahedra (point group symmetry .2.) and trans-NiN4O2 octahedra (point group symmetry 2..) that are linked through the bridging thiocyanate anions into a three-dimensional framework structure (Fig. 1). The Hg—S bond lengths [mean 2.552 (3) Å] are in very good agreement compared with those of HgS4 tetrahedra in the above-mentioned solvent-free MHg(SCN)4 structures, which have a mean of 2.57 (5) Å. The trans-NiN4O2 octahedra are defined by four N atoms belonging to four bridging thiocyanate anions and by two O atoms of isolated methanol molecules. The displacement parameters of the methanol molecule are rather high. The methanol molecule has relatively much space for libration, because it is not part of the framework structure and points into the remaining free space. Thus the displacement ellipsoids of the methanol O and especially of the C atom are enlarged (Fig. 1). Moreover, there is only a weak hydrogen-bonding interaction to an adjacent S atom that stabilizes this arrangement (Table 2).
[NiHg(SCN)4(CH3OH)2]n and [NiHg(SCN)4(H2O)2]n have a similar composition. Although the basic structure units (HgS4 tetrahedra and trans-NiN4O2 octahedra linked by thiocyanate bridges) are the same, the corresponding crystal structures are markedly different. The methanol-containing structure has tetragonal symmetry and is non-centrosymmetric, the water-containing structure has monoclinic symmetry and is centrosymmetric (space group C2/c). Whereas in the water-containing structure the HgS4 and NiN4O2 polyhedra are alternately arranged in layers parallel to (001) (Fig. 2), the arrangement in the methanol-containing compound is markedly different (Fig. 1).
The common structural motif in the above-mentioned MHg(SCN)4 compounds is the linkage of MN4 units (planar configuration for Cu and tetahedral for all other M members) and tetrahedral HgS4 units through thiocyanate bridges. It seems that a
of four is not favoured for structures with M = Ni. In the structures of [NiHg(SCN)4(CH3OH)2]n, [NiHg(SCN)4(H2O)2]n and NiHg2(SCN)6, the Ni2+ ions all have coordination numbers of six, which probably is the reason why a compound with composition NiHg(SCN)4 (most probably requiring a [4]-coordination for Ni2+) has not yet been isolated.Hg(SCN)2 was prepared by adding stoichiometric amounts of KSCN to a slightly acidified aqueous solution of Hg(NO3)2. The colourless precipitate was filtered off, washed with water and dried.
For the gel-growth experiment, 1.2 g Ni(NO3)2.6H2O and 1.2 g NH4SCN were dissolved in 20 ml water. To this solution, 0.5 g freshly prepared Hg(SCN)2 was slowly added until complete dissolution. Then 2 ml TMOS was added dropwise under stirring. Gelling time was about 3 hours. After one week, blue single crystals of the title compound up to 5 mm in length had formed in the gel matrix.
The H atom of the methanol hydroxy group was located from a difference map and was refined with a distance restraint of 0.90 (1) Å. The H atoms associated with the methyl group of the methanol molecule could not be located from difference Fourier maps. As a result of the high libration of this molecule, it seems probable that the methyl H atoms are disordered and were therefore refined with two positions with half-occupancy and rotated by 60 degrees. Ueq of these H atoms were set 1.5Uiso of the parent C atom. The remaining maximum and minimum electron densities are found 0.36 and 0.06 Å, respectively, from atom O1. Reflection (011) was affected by the beamstop and was discarded from the refinement.
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2008); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2008); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ATOMS for Windows (Dowty, 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).Fig. 1. The crystal structure of [NiHg(SCN)4(CH3OH)2] in a projection along [010]. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 90% probability level. H atoms are omitted for clarity. [Symmetry code: iv) -x, -y + 1, z.] | |
Fig. 2. The crystal structure of [NiHg(SCN)4(H2O)2] (Porai Koshits, 1960) in a projection along [010]. Colour code as in Fig. 1. |
[NiHg(NCS)4(CH4O)2] | Dx = 2.416 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 555.70 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Tetragonal, I42d | Cell parameters from 9082 reflections |
Hall symbol: I -4 2bw | θ = 2.9–40.0° |
a = 10.1746 (3) Å | µ = 11.81 mm−1 |
c = 29.5107 (11) Å | T = 100 K |
V = 3055.02 (17) Å3 | Spherical, blue |
Z = 8 | 0.18 × 0.18 × 0.18 mm |
F(000) = 2080 |
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer | 4684 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 4214 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.028 |
ω and ϕ scans | θmax = 40.0°, θmin = 2.8° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008) | h = −17→17 |
Tmin = 0.567, Tmax = 0.748 | k = −18→12 |
17699 measured reflections | l = −41→53 |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.026 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
wR(F2) = 0.051 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 0.96 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.004 |
4684 reflections | Δρmax = 1.63 e Å−3 |
87 parameters | Δρmin = −1.46 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 2098 Friedel pairs |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Absolute structure parameter: 0.011 (4) |
[NiHg(NCS)4(CH4O)2] | Z = 8 |
Mr = 555.70 | Mo Kα radiation |
Tetragonal, I42d | µ = 11.81 mm−1 |
a = 10.1746 (3) Å | T = 100 K |
c = 29.5107 (11) Å | 0.18 × 0.18 × 0.18 mm |
V = 3055.02 (17) Å3 |
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer | 4684 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008) | 4214 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.567, Tmax = 0.748 | Rint = 0.028 |
17699 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.026 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
wR(F2) = 0.051 | Δρmax = 1.63 e Å−3 |
S = 0.96 | Δρmin = −1.46 e Å−3 |
4684 reflections | Absolute structure: Flack (1983), 2098 Friedel pairs |
87 parameters | Absolute structure parameter: 0.011 (4) |
0 restraints |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | Occ. (<1) | |
Hg1 | 0.2500 | 0.529525 (12) | 0.8750 | 0.01652 (3) | |
Ni1 | 0.0000 | 0.5000 | 1.050596 (14) | 0.01130 (8) | |
S1 | 0.34284 (7) | 0.39974 (6) | 0.94163 (2) | 0.01777 (12) | |
S2 | 0.07460 (8) | 0.66758 (7) | 0.91464 (2) | 0.02210 (14) | |
C1 | 0.0628 (3) | 0.7838 (2) | 0.87530 (12) | 0.0204 (4) | |
C2 | 0.2196 (2) | 0.4289 (2) | 0.97739 (8) | 0.0141 (4) | |
N1 | 0.1356 (2) | 0.4484 (2) | 1.00263 (8) | 0.0177 (4) | |
N2 | 0.0514 (3) | 0.8668 (2) | 0.84917 (8) | 0.0256 (5) | |
O1 | −0.0812 (2) | 0.3139 (2) | 1.05077 (16) | 0.0593 (11) | |
C3 | −0.0338 (4) | 0.1958 (4) | 1.0511 (3) | 0.075 (2) | |
H2A | −0.1061 | 0.1322 | 1.0511 | 0.112* | 0.50 |
H2B | 0.0198 | 0.1834 | 1.0783 | 0.112* | 0.50 |
H2C | 0.0207 | 0.1825 | 1.0241 | 0.112* | 0.50 |
H2D | 0.0624 | 0.1999 | 1.0513 | 0.112* | 0.50 |
H2E | −0.0635 | 0.1487 | 1.0240 | 0.112* | 0.50 |
H2F | −0.0644 | 0.1495 | 1.0782 | 0.112* | 0.50 |
H1 | −0.164 (2) | 0.331 (5) | 1.0596 (16) | 0.061 (14)* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Hg1 | 0.02513 (7) | 0.01081 (5) | 0.01362 (5) | 0.000 | 0.00653 (5) | 0.000 |
Ni1 | 0.00883 (17) | 0.01668 (19) | 0.00839 (15) | 0.00111 (13) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
S1 | 0.0170 (3) | 0.0176 (3) | 0.0187 (3) | 0.0054 (2) | 0.0082 (2) | 0.0037 (2) |
S2 | 0.0323 (4) | 0.0168 (3) | 0.0173 (3) | 0.0118 (3) | 0.0094 (3) | 0.0071 (2) |
C1 | 0.0318 (12) | 0.0153 (10) | 0.0141 (9) | 0.0070 (9) | 0.0014 (11) | −0.0010 (10) |
C2 | 0.0144 (10) | 0.0145 (9) | 0.0133 (10) | 0.0015 (8) | −0.0006 (8) | 0.0005 (8) |
N1 | 0.0153 (9) | 0.0255 (11) | 0.0121 (8) | 0.0009 (8) | −0.0008 (7) | −0.0011 (8) |
N2 | 0.0478 (16) | 0.0150 (10) | 0.0141 (9) | 0.0107 (10) | −0.0019 (10) | −0.0006 (8) |
O1 | 0.0126 (10) | 0.0178 (11) | 0.147 (4) | 0.0008 (8) | 0.0117 (16) | 0.0146 (16) |
C3 | 0.030 (2) | 0.0187 (16) | 0.176 (7) | 0.0003 (15) | −0.011 (3) | −0.011 (3) |
Hg1—S1i | 2.5499 (7) | C1—N2 | 1.149 (4) |
Hg1—S1 | 2.5499 (7) | C2—N1 | 1.151 (3) |
Hg1—S2 | 2.5546 (7) | N2—Ni1v | 2.041 (2) |
Hg1—S2i | 2.5546 (7) | O1—C3 | 1.295 (4) |
Ni1—N2ii | 2.041 (2) | O1—H1 | 0.897 (10) |
Ni1—N2iii | 2.041 (2) | C3—H2A | 0.9800 |
Ni1—N1iv | 2.045 (2) | C3—H2B | 0.9800 |
Ni1—N1 | 2.045 (2) | C3—H2C | 0.9800 |
Ni1—O1 | 2.066 (2) | C3—H2D | 0.9800 |
Ni1—O1iv | 2.066 (2) | C3—H2E | 0.9800 |
S1—C2 | 1.666 (2) | C3—H2F | 0.9800 |
S2—C1 | 1.661 (3) | ||
S1i—Hg1—S1 | 117.62 (3) | C1—N2—Ni1v | 170.1 (3) |
S1i—Hg1—S2 | 112.27 (2) | C3—O1—Ni1 | 134.5 (2) |
S1—Hg1—S2 | 100.98 (2) | C3—O1—H1 | 122 (3) |
S1i—Hg1—S2i | 100.98 (2) | Ni1—O1—H1 | 101 (3) |
S1—Hg1—S2i | 112.27 (2) | O1—C3—H2A | 109.5 |
S2—Hg1—S2i | 113.29 (3) | O1—C3—H2B | 109.5 |
N2ii—Ni1—N2iii | 90.77 (13) | H2A—C3—H2B | 109.5 |
N2ii—Ni1—N1iv | 88.42 (9) | O1—C3—H2C | 109.5 |
N2iii—Ni1—N1iv | 179.17 (9) | H2A—C3—H2C | 109.5 |
N2ii—Ni1—N1 | 179.17 (9) | H2B—C3—H2C | 109.5 |
N2iii—Ni1—N1 | 88.42 (9) | O1—C3—H2D | 109.5 |
N1iv—Ni1—N1 | 92.40 (12) | H2A—C3—H2D | 141.1 |
N2ii—Ni1—O1 | 88.12 (13) | H2B—C3—H2D | 56.3 |
N2iii—Ni1—O1 | 91.68 (14) | H2C—C3—H2D | 56.3 |
N1iv—Ni1—O1 | 88.11 (13) | O1—C3—H2E | 109.5 |
N1—Ni1—O1 | 92.08 (13) | H2A—C3—H2E | 56.3 |
N2ii—Ni1—O1iv | 91.68 (14) | H2B—C3—H2E | 141.1 |
N2iii—Ni1—O1iv | 88.12 (13) | H2C—C3—H2E | 56.3 |
N1iv—Ni1—O1iv | 92.08 (13) | H2D—C3—H2E | 109.5 |
N1—Ni1—O1iv | 88.11 (13) | O1—C3—H2F | 109.5 |
O1—Ni1—O1iv | 179.7 (3) | H2A—C3—H2F | 56.3 |
C2—S1—Hg1 | 96.75 (9) | H2B—C3—H2F | 56.3 |
C1—S2—Hg1 | 97.01 (10) | H2C—C3—H2F | 141.1 |
N2—C1—S2 | 177.4 (3) | H2D—C3—H2F | 109.5 |
N1—C2—S1 | 179.0 (2) | H2E—C3—H2F | 109.5 |
C2—N1—Ni1 | 173.3 (2) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, y, −z+7/4; (ii) y−1, x+1/2, z+1/4; (iii) −y+1, −x+1/2, z+1/4; (iv) −x, −y+1, z; (v) −y+1/2, −x+1, z−1/4. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O1—H1···S1vi | 0.90 (1) | 2.40 (2) | 3.262 (2) | 160 (4) |
Symmetry code: (vi) −y, x, −z+2. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | [NiHg(NCS)4(CH4O)2] |
Mr | 555.70 |
Crystal system, space group | Tetragonal, I42d |
Temperature (K) | 100 |
a, c (Å) | 10.1746 (3), 29.5107 (11) |
V (Å3) | 3055.02 (17) |
Z | 8 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 11.81 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.18 × 0.18 × 0.18 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2008) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.567, 0.748 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 17699, 4684, 4214 |
Rint | 0.028 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.904 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.026, 0.051, 0.96 |
No. of reflections | 4684 |
No. of parameters | 87 |
H-atom treatment | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 1.63, −1.46 |
Absolute structure | Flack (1983), 2098 Friedel pairs |
Absolute structure parameter | 0.011 (4) |
Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2008), SAINT (Bruker, 2008), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ATOMS for Windows (Dowty, 2006).
Hg1—S1i | 2.5499 (7) | Ni1—N2iii | 2.041 (2) |
Hg1—S1 | 2.5499 (7) | Ni1—N1iv | 2.045 (2) |
Hg1—S2 | 2.5546 (7) | Ni1—N1 | 2.045 (2) |
Hg1—S2i | 2.5546 (7) | Ni1—O1 | 2.066 (2) |
Ni1—N2ii | 2.041 (2) | Ni1—O1iv | 2.066 (2) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1/2, y, −z+7/4; (ii) y−1, x+1/2, z+1/4; (iii) −y+1, −x+1/2, z+1/4; (iv) −x, −y+1, z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O1—H1···S1v | 0.897 (10) | 2.40 (2) | 3.262 (2) | 160 (4) |
Symmetry code: (v) −y, x, −z+2. |
Acknowledgements
The X-ray centre of the Vienna University of Technology is acknowledged for providing access to the single-crystal diffractometer.
References
Bergman, J. G. Jr, McFee, J. H. & Crane, G. R. (1970). Mater. Res. Bull. 5, 913–917. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Brown, D. B., Crawford, V. H., Hall, J. W. & Hatfield, W. E. (1977). J. Phys. Chem. 81, 1303–1306. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bruker (2008). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Dowty, E. (2006). ATOMS for Windows. Shape Software, Kingsport, Tennessee, USA. Google Scholar
Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Henisch, H. K. (1996). In Crystal Growth in Gels. New York: Dover Publications. Google Scholar
Iizuka, M. (1978). Annual Report of Bunkyo University, March issue, pp. 65–68. Google Scholar
Iizuka, M. & Sudo, T. (1968). Z. Kristallogr. 126, 376–378. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Jeffery, J. W. & Rose, K. M. (1968). Acta Cryst. B24, 653–662. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Khandar, A. A., Klein, A., Bakhtiari, A., Mahjoub, A. R. & Pohl, R. W. H. (2011). J. Solid State Chem. 184, 379–386. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Porai Koshits, M. A. (1960). Kristallografiya, 5, 462–463. Google Scholar
Porai Koshits, M. A. (1963). Zh. Strukt. Khim. 4, 584–593. CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Xu, D., Yu, W.-T., Wang, X.-Q., Yuan, D.-R., Lu, M.-K., Yang, P., Guo, S.-Y., Meng, F.-Q. & Jiang, M.-H. (1999). Acta Cryst. C55, 1203–1205. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Yan, Y.-X., Fang, Q., Yu, W.-T., Yuan, D.-R., Tian, Y.-P. & Williams, I. D. (1999). Acta Chim. Sin. 57, 1257–1261. CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.