research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 70| Part 10| October 2014| Pages 246-248

Crystal structure of the cage derivative penta­cyclo­[5.4.0.02,6.03,10.05,9]undeca-8,11-dione ethyl­ene di­thio­ketal

aDepartment of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology - Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India
*Correspondence e-mail: srk@chem.iitb.ac.in

Edited by T. N. Guru Row, Indian Institute of Science, India (Received 16 July 2014; accepted 16 September 2014; online 24 September 2014)

The title penta­cyclo­undecane cage derivative, C13H14OS2, was identified during a thio­ketalization reaction. The reaction selectively gave the title compound and the product corresponding to bis-ketal was not formed. The title compound exhibits unusual Csp3—Csp3 single bond lengths ranging from 1.495 (3) to 1.581 (2) and strained bond angles as small as 89.29 (12) and as large as 115.11 (11)°.

1. Chemical context

Caged mol­ecules have found utility in various fields of science such as medicine, high energy materials and complex natural product synthesis. The high symmetry, rigid geometry and inherent strain present in these mol­ecules make them theoretically inter­esting and synthetically challenging mol­ecular frames (Marchand, 1989[Marchand, A. P. (1989). Chem. Rev. 89, 1011-1033.]; Mehta et al., 1997[Mehta, G. & Srikrishna, A. (1997). Chem. Rev. 97, 671-720.]).

[Scheme 1]

In contribution to the ongoing research in the versatile area of pentacyclo[5.4.0.02,6.03,10.05,9]undecane-8,11-dione (PCUD) cage compounds, we report the crystal structure of an unsymmetrically substituted di­thio­ketal derivative (2). The dione (1) was treated with 1,2-ethane­dithiol using benzene as a solvent under reflux temperature. The reaction selectively gave (2), a mono-substituted product rather than the symmetrically di-substituted product or rearranged product (Fig. 1[link]). The title compound (2) is known (Saures et al., 1983[Sauers, R. R., Zampino, M., Stockl, M., Ferentz, J. & Shams, H. (1983). J. Org. Chem. 48, 1862-1866.]; Mlinarić-Majerski et al., 1998[Mlinarić-Majerski, K., Veljković, J., Marchand, A. P. & Ganguly, B. (1998). Tetrahedron, 54, 11381-11386.]) but its crystal structure has not been reported to date.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
ORTEP diagrams of (2) showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

2. Structural commentary

The cage skeleton of (2) can be described as a fusion of four five-membered rings and one four-membered and one six-membered ring. The title compound is unsymmetrically substituted at the mouth of the cage, with a ketone substituent at atom C1 and a di­thio­ketal substituent at atom C9 classifying the mol­ecule as a spiro-compound (Fig. 1[link]). The five-membered rings C3/C4/C6/C7/C11 and C4–C7/C8/C5 each adopt an almost ideal envelope conformation (flap atom C6). The di­thio­ketal ring, S1/C9/S2/C13/C12, also adopts an envelope conformation (flap atom C9). The remaining two rings, C2–C4/C5/C1 and C7–C8 are twisted on C1–C5 and C7–C11, respectively. The tetra­hedral bond angle C3—C2—C10 is the most strained, corresponding to the smallest angle [89.29 (12)°]. The C8—C9—S2 angle [115.11 (11)°] is found to be the largest one. The deviations from the standard value of 109.5° are considerable.

Previous studies showed that PCU-caged compounds normally display C—C bond lengths which deviate from expected value of 1.54 Å (Bott et al., 1998[Bott, S. G., Marchand, A. P., Alihodzic, S. & Kumar, K. A. (1998). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 28, 251-258.]: Linden et al., 2005[Linden, A., Romański, J., Mlostoń, G. & Heimgartner, H. (2005). Acta Cryst. C61, o221-o226.]; Kruger et al., 2005[Kruger, H. G., Rademeyer, M. & Ramdhani, R. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, o3968-o3970.]; Flippen-Anderson et al. 1991[Flippen-Anderson, J. L., George, C., Gilardi, R., Zajac, W. W., Walters, T. R., Marchand, A., Dave, P. R. & Arney, B. E. (1991). Acta Cryst. C47, 813-817.]). The structure of (1) also exhibits unusual Csp3—Csp3 single bond lengths ranging from 1.507 (2) to 1.581 (2) Å. In compound 2, the bond C5—C8, which is parallel and immediately adjacent to the C1–C9 axis was found to be longest at 1.581 (2) Å. Similarly, the bonds C2—C3, C3—C4, C4—C5 and C10—C11 were also found to exceed the expected value of 1.54 Å. The bonds C4—C6, C6—C7, C1—C5 and C1—C2 are short and deviate from the standard value. In the four-membered ring, one side is significantly longer [C2—C10, 1.57 (2) Å] than the remaining sides which are statistically equivalent. The C2—C10 and C5—C8 bonds [1.58 Å (2)] are the longest in (2) and similar to the same bonds in (1) [1.585 (4)–1.592 (4) Å; Linden et al., 2005[Linden, A., Romański, J., Mlostoń, G. & Heimgartner, H. (2005). Acta Cryst. C61, o221-o226.]].

The presence of C—S bonds in (2) reveals the loss of coupling of one sp2 carbon atom in the parent diketone (1). The distance between the carbons C10 and C9 bearing di­thio­ketal ring is found to be considerably longer [1.533 (2) Å] than the carbons C1 and C2 [1.507 (2) Å] bearing the carbonyl group.

3. Synthesis and crystallization

Preparation of compound (2): To a stirred suspension of dione (1) (630 mg, 3.6 mmol) in dry benzene (20 mL) was added 1,2-ethane­dithiol (1 mL) and p-toluenesulfonic acid (PTSA) (20 mg). The reaction mixture was refluxed and the water generated was removed with the aid of a Dean–Stark apparatus for 1 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC and at the conclusion of the reaction, the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL × 4). Yellow crystals were isolated when the solvent was allowed to evaporate (926 mg, 100%). The 1H NMR and 13C spectra were compared with literature reports and found to be identical. M.p. 382–383 K (literature m.p. 369–371 K; Majerski & Veljkovik, 1998).

3.1. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1[link]. C-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically with C—H = 1.00 Å, and refined as rinding with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Table 1
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula C13H14OS2
Mr 250.36
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K) 150
a, b, c (Å) 7.1332 (2), 13.9220 (3), 11.4066 (3)
β (°) 101.405 (2)
V3) 1110.40 (5)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.45
Crystal size (mm) 0.32 × 0.28 × 0.23
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur-S
Absorption correction Multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2006[Oxford Diffraction (2006). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, England.])
Tmin, Tmax 0.869, 0.903
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 7821, 1963, 1828
Rint 0.014
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.595
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.029, 0.082, 1.11
No. of reflections 1963
No. of parameters 145
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.70, −0.25
Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006[Oxford Diffraction (2006). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, England.]), SHELXS97 and SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]) and ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012[Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849-854.]).

Supporting information


Chemical context top

Caged molecules have found utility in various fields of science such as medicine, high energy materials and complex natural product synthesis. The high symmetry, rigid geometry and inherent strain present in these molecules make them theoretically inter­esting and synthetically challenging molecular frames (Marchand, 1989; Mehta et al., 1997).

In contribution to the ongoing research in the versatile area of PCUD cage compounds, we report the crystal structure of an unsymmetrically substituted di­thio­ketal derivative (2). The dione (1) was treated with 1,2-ethane­dithiol using benzene as a solvent under reflux temperature. The reaction selectively gave (2), a mono-substituted product rather than the symmetrically di-substituted product or rearranged product (Fig. 1). The title compound (2) is known (Saures et al., 1983; Mlinarić-Majerski et al., 1998) but its crystal structure has not previously been reported.

Structural commentary top

The cage skeleton of (2) can be described as a fusion of four five-membered rings and one four-membered and one six-membered ring. The title compound is unsymmetrically substituted at the mouth of the cage, with a ketone substituent at atom C1 and a di­thio­ketal substituent at atom C9 classifying the molecule into spiro-compounds (Fig. 1). The five-membered rings C3–C11 and C4–C7/C8/C5 each adopt an almost ideal envelope conformation (flap atom C6). The di­thio­ketal ring, S1/C9/S2/C13/C12, also adopts an envelope conformation (flap atom C8). The remaining two rings, C2–C4/C5/C1 and C7–C8 are twisted on C1–C5 and C8–C9 respectively. The tetra­hedral bond angle C3—C2—C10 is the most strained, corresponding to the smallest angle [89.29 (12)°]. The C8—C9—S2 angle [115.11 (11)°] is found to be the largest one. This shows the deviation from standard value of 109.5°.

Previous studies showed that PCU-caged compounds normally display C—C bond lengths which deviate from expected value of 1.54 Å (Bott et al., 1998: Linden et al., 2005; Kruger et al., 2005; Flippen-Anderson et al. 1991). The structure of (1) also exhibits unusual Csp3—Csp3 single bond lengths ranging from 1.507 (2) to 1.581 (2) Å. In compound 2, the bond C5—C8, which is parallel and immediately adjacent to the C1–C9 axis was found to be longer at 1.581 (2) Å. Similarly, the bonds C2—C3, C3—C4, C4—C5 and C10—C11 were also found to exceed the expected value of 1.54 Å. The bonds C4—C6, C6—C7, C1—C5 and C1—C2 are found to be short and deviate from the standard value. In the four-membered ring, one side is significantly longer [C2—C10, 1.57 (2) Å] than remaining sides which are statistically equivalent. The C2—C10 and C5—C8 bond [1.58 Å (2)] are longest in (2), but relatively shorter than those bonds in the parent diketone (1) [1.585 (4)–1.592 (4) Å, Linden et al. 2005].

The presence of C—S bonds reveal that a loss of coupling of one sp2 carbon atom in the parent diketone (1). The distance between the carbons C10 and C9 bearing di­thio­ketal ring is found to be considerably longer [1.533 (2) Å] than the carbons C1 and C2 [1.507 (2) Å] bearing the carbonyl group.

Synthesis and crystallization top

Preparation of compound (2): To a stirred suspension of dione 1 (630 mg, 3.6 mmol) in dry benzene (20 mL) was added 1,2-ethane­dithiol (1 mL) and PTSA (20 mg). The reaction mixture was refluxed and the water generated was removed with the aid of a Dean–Stark apparatus for 1 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC and at the conclusion of the reaction, the mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (20 mL × 4). Yellow crystals were isolated when the solvent was allowed to evaporate (926 mg, 100%). The 1H NMR and 13C spectra were compared with literature reports and found to be identical. M.p. 383–383 K (literature m.p. 369–371 K; Majerski & Veljkovik, 1998).

Refinement top

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1. C-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically with C—H = 1.00 Å, and refined as rinding with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Bott et al. (1998); Flippen-Anderson, George, Gilardi, Zajac, Walters, Marchand, Dave & Arney (1991); Kruger et al. (2005); Linden et al. (2005); Marchand (1989); Mehta & Srikrishna (1997); Mlinarić-Majerski, Veljković, Marchand & Ganguly (1998).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2006); cell refinement: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006); data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. ORTEP diagrams of (2) showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
Pentacyclo[5.4.0.02,6.03,10.05,9]undeca-8,11-dione ethylene dithioketal top
Crystal data top
C13H14OS2F(000) = 528
Mr = 250.36Dx = 1.498 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.1332 (2) ÅCell parameters from 8769 reflections
b = 13.9220 (3) Åθ = 3.4–32.7°
c = 11.4066 (3) ŵ = 0.45 mm1
β = 101.405 (2)°T = 150 K
V = 1110.40 (5) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 40.32 × 0.28 × 0.23 mm
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur-S
diffractometer
1963 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source1828 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.014
Detector resolution: 15.9948 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 3.4°
ω/q–scanh = 78
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2006)
k = 1615
Tmin = 0.869, Tmax = 0.903l = 1312
7821 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.082H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.11 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0452P)2 + 0.6547P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1963 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
145 parametersΔρmax = 0.70 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.25 e Å3
Crystal data top
C13H14OS2V = 1110.40 (5) Å3
Mr = 250.36Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 7.1332 (2) ŵ = 0.45 mm1
b = 13.9220 (3) ÅT = 150 K
c = 11.4066 (3) Å0.32 × 0.28 × 0.23 mm
β = 101.405 (2)°
Data collection top
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur-S
diffractometer
1963 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2006)
1828 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.869, Tmax = 0.903Rint = 0.014
7821 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0290 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.082H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.11Δρmax = 0.70 e Å3
1963 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.25 e Å3
145 parameters
Special details top

Experimental. Empirical absorption correction using spherical harmonics, implemented in SCALE3 ABSPACK scaling algorithm.

Melting points were recorded on Labhosp or Veego melting point apparatus and are uncorrected.

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.70478 (6)0.27978 (3)0.98003 (4)0.02159 (15)
S20.31454 (6)0.33911 (3)0.86666 (4)0.02312 (15)
O10.23114 (17)0.50405 (10)0.65373 (11)0.0269 (3)
C10.3959 (2)0.48249 (12)0.69306 (15)0.0190 (4)
C20.5157 (2)0.40985 (12)0.64299 (15)0.0195 (4)
H20.45780.38090.56390.023*
C30.7083 (2)0.46561 (13)0.65013 (15)0.0203 (4)
H30.75960.47100.57490.024*
C40.6953 (2)0.55972 (13)0.72195 (15)0.0204 (4)
H40.67350.61980.67320.024*
C50.5351 (2)0.53335 (12)0.79096 (15)0.0181 (4)
H50.47890.59010.82520.022*
C60.8787 (2)0.55754 (13)0.81748 (16)0.0222 (4)
H6A0.99560.56190.78320.027*
H6B0.88080.60740.87970.027*
C70.8454 (2)0.45675 (12)0.86211 (14)0.0172 (4)
H70.94660.43250.92910.021*
C80.6413 (2)0.46086 (11)0.88865 (14)0.0157 (3)
H80.63970.48240.97210.019*
C90.5690 (2)0.35734 (12)0.86447 (15)0.0164 (3)
C100.6202 (2)0.33897 (12)0.74202 (15)0.0176 (4)
H100.62180.27000.71760.021*
C110.8111 (2)0.39489 (12)0.74749 (15)0.0183 (4)
H110.92260.35810.72950.022*
C120.5231 (3)0.18830 (14)0.96940 (19)0.0299 (4)
H12A0.51580.15080.89490.036*
H12B0.55370.14381.03830.036*
C130.3370 (3)0.23778 (15)0.9692 (2)0.0354 (5)
H13A0.33240.26061.05080.042*
H13B0.22980.19240.94370.042*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0220 (2)0.0183 (2)0.0231 (2)0.00132 (16)0.00120 (17)0.00425 (16)
S20.0157 (2)0.0251 (3)0.0290 (3)0.00044 (16)0.00552 (17)0.00363 (18)
O10.0195 (6)0.0323 (7)0.0268 (7)0.0063 (5)0.0005 (5)0.0023 (6)
C10.0192 (8)0.0200 (9)0.0177 (8)0.0013 (7)0.0034 (7)0.0038 (7)
C20.0188 (8)0.0235 (9)0.0146 (8)0.0002 (7)0.0001 (6)0.0034 (7)
C30.0203 (8)0.0271 (9)0.0139 (8)0.0005 (7)0.0045 (7)0.0003 (7)
C40.0226 (9)0.0202 (9)0.0182 (8)0.0015 (7)0.0037 (7)0.0026 (7)
C50.0196 (8)0.0160 (8)0.0188 (8)0.0025 (6)0.0039 (7)0.0003 (6)
C60.0215 (9)0.0238 (9)0.0207 (9)0.0051 (7)0.0030 (7)0.0001 (7)
C70.0152 (8)0.0207 (9)0.0151 (8)0.0005 (6)0.0016 (6)0.0012 (6)
C80.0172 (8)0.0161 (8)0.0139 (8)0.0008 (6)0.0030 (6)0.0014 (6)
C90.0143 (7)0.0165 (8)0.0183 (8)0.0011 (6)0.0029 (6)0.0001 (6)
C100.0168 (8)0.0175 (8)0.0183 (8)0.0019 (6)0.0025 (6)0.0045 (6)
C110.0158 (8)0.0230 (9)0.0168 (8)0.0021 (6)0.0046 (6)0.0023 (7)
C120.0310 (10)0.0225 (9)0.0371 (11)0.0039 (8)0.0090 (8)0.0072 (8)
C130.0351 (11)0.0282 (10)0.0462 (13)0.0019 (8)0.0162 (10)0.0075 (9)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
S1—C121.8039 (19)C6—C71.527 (2)
S1—C91.8268 (16)C6—H6A0.9900
S2—C131.819 (2)C6—H6B0.9900
S2—C91.8375 (16)C7—C111.544 (2)
O1—C11.210 (2)C7—C81.546 (2)
C1—C21.507 (2)C7—H71.0000
C1—C51.515 (2)C8—C91.537 (2)
C2—C31.566 (2)C8—H81.0000
C2—C101.572 (2)C9—C101.533 (2)
C2—H21.0000C10—C111.560 (2)
C3—C111.555 (2)C10—H101.0000
C3—C41.558 (2)C11—H111.0000
C3—H31.0000C12—C131.495 (3)
C4—C61.528 (2)C12—H12A0.9900
C4—C51.555 (2)C12—H12B0.9900
C4—H41.0000C13—H13A0.9900
C5—C81.581 (2)C13—H13B0.9900
C5—H51.0000
C12—S1—C995.59 (8)C11—C7—H7115.4
C13—S2—C998.87 (9)C8—C7—H7115.4
O1—C1—C2127.43 (16)C9—C8—C7103.06 (12)
O1—C1—C5127.17 (16)C9—C8—C5112.02 (13)
C2—C1—C5104.77 (13)C7—C8—C5102.96 (12)
C1—C2—C3101.82 (13)C9—C8—H8112.7
C1—C2—C10111.87 (14)C7—C8—H8112.7
C3—C2—C1089.29 (12)C5—C8—H8112.7
C1—C2—H2116.6C10—C9—C8100.83 (13)
C3—C2—H2116.6C10—C9—S1111.77 (11)
C10—C2—H2116.6C8—C9—S1108.26 (11)
C11—C3—C4103.04 (13)C10—C9—S2113.78 (11)
C11—C3—C290.48 (13)C8—C9—S2115.11 (11)
C4—C3—C2107.56 (13)S1—C9—S2107.03 (8)
C11—C3—H3117.3C9—C10—C11104.11 (13)
C4—C3—H3117.3C9—C10—C2112.67 (13)
C2—C3—H3117.3C11—C10—C290.09 (12)
C6—C4—C5104.22 (14)C9—C10—H10115.6
C6—C4—C3103.11 (14)C11—C10—H10115.6
C5—C4—C3101.17 (13)C2—C10—H10115.6
C6—C4—H4115.5C7—C11—C3102.99 (13)
C5—C4—H4115.5C7—C11—C10107.65 (13)
C3—C4—H4115.5C3—C11—C1090.13 (12)
C1—C5—C4100.21 (13)C7—C11—H11117.4
C1—C5—C8111.96 (13)C3—C11—H11117.4
C4—C5—C8102.11 (12)C10—C11—H11117.4
C1—C5—H5113.7C13—C12—S1107.50 (14)
C4—C5—H5113.7C13—C12—H12A110.2
C8—C5—H5113.7S1—C12—H12A110.2
C7—C6—C495.07 (13)C13—C12—H12B110.2
C7—C6—H6A112.7S1—C12—H12B110.2
C4—C6—H6A112.7H12A—C12—H12B108.5
C7—C6—H6B112.7C12—C13—S2108.87 (14)
C4—C6—H6B112.7C12—C13—H13A109.9
H6A—C6—H6B110.2S2—C13—H13A109.9
C6—C7—C11103.84 (13)C12—C13—H13B109.9
C6—C7—C8104.24 (13)S2—C13—H13B109.9
C11—C7—C8100.88 (12)H13A—C13—H13B108.3
C6—C7—H7115.4
O1—C1—C2—C3135.00 (18)C5—C8—C9—S1178.63 (10)
C5—C1—C2—C336.34 (16)C7—C8—C9—S2171.69 (11)
O1—C1—C2—C10130.97 (18)C5—C8—C9—S261.68 (16)
C5—C1—C2—C1057.69 (17)C12—S1—C9—C1095.11 (13)
C1—C2—C3—C11112.54 (13)C12—S1—C9—C8154.73 (12)
C10—C2—C3—C110.33 (12)C12—S1—C9—S230.09 (10)
C1—C2—C3—C48.70 (16)C13—S2—C9—C10115.38 (13)
C10—C2—C3—C4103.51 (14)C13—S2—C9—C8128.95 (13)
C11—C3—C4—C633.71 (16)C13—S2—C9—S18.59 (11)
C2—C3—C4—C6128.43 (14)C8—C9—C10—C1134.98 (15)
C11—C3—C4—C573.93 (14)S1—C9—C10—C1179.85 (14)
C2—C3—C4—C520.79 (16)S2—C9—C10—C11158.78 (11)
O1—C1—C5—C4121.01 (19)C8—C9—C10—C261.15 (15)
C2—C1—C5—C450.35 (15)S1—C9—C10—C2175.98 (11)
O1—C1—C5—C8131.38 (18)S2—C9—C10—C262.66 (16)
C2—C1—C5—C857.25 (17)C1—C2—C10—C92.57 (19)
C6—C4—C5—C1148.84 (13)C3—C2—C10—C9105.03 (14)
C3—C4—C5—C142.07 (15)C1—C2—C10—C11102.79 (14)
C6—C4—C5—C833.54 (16)C3—C2—C10—C110.33 (12)
C3—C4—C5—C873.22 (14)C6—C7—C11—C333.28 (15)
C5—C4—C6—C752.64 (15)C8—C7—C11—C374.50 (14)
C3—C4—C6—C752.68 (15)C6—C7—C11—C10127.63 (14)
C4—C6—C7—C1152.89 (15)C8—C7—C11—C1019.86 (16)
C4—C6—C7—C852.37 (15)C4—C3—C11—C70.34 (15)
C6—C7—C8—C9149.65 (13)C2—C3—C11—C7108.49 (13)
C11—C7—C8—C942.19 (15)C4—C3—C11—C10107.82 (13)
C6—C7—C8—C533.01 (15)C2—C3—C11—C100.34 (12)
C11—C7—C8—C574.45 (14)C9—C10—C11—C79.41 (17)
C1—C5—C8—C93.37 (19)C2—C10—C11—C7104.03 (14)
C4—C5—C8—C9109.75 (14)C9—C10—C11—C3113.10 (13)
C1—C5—C8—C7106.71 (15)C2—C10—C11—C30.34 (12)
C4—C5—C8—C70.33 (15)C9—S1—C12—C1347.06 (15)
C7—C8—C9—C1048.80 (14)S1—C12—C13—S245.66 (18)
C5—C8—C9—C1061.20 (15)C9—S2—C13—C1222.26 (16)
C7—C8—C9—S168.63 (13)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC13H14OS2
Mr250.36
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)150
a, b, c (Å)7.1332 (2), 13.9220 (3), 11.4066 (3)
β (°) 101.405 (2)
V3)1110.40 (5)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.45
Crystal size (mm)0.32 × 0.28 × 0.23
Data collection
DiffractometerOxford Diffraction Xcalibur-S
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2006)
Tmin, Tmax0.869, 0.903
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
7821, 1963, 1828
Rint0.014
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.595
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.029, 0.082, 1.11
No. of reflections1963
No. of parameters145
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.70, 0.25

Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2006), CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2006), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012).

 

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the DST for financial support. We also thank SAIF, Mumbai, for recording the spectroscopic data. SV thanks IIT, Bombay, and UGC, New Delhi, for the award of research fellowship. SK thanks the DST for the award of a J. C. Bose fellowship and also thanks Darshan Mhatre for his help and Professor H. G. Kruger and Professor G. Maguire for their useful suggestions.

References

First citationBott, S. G., Marchand, A. P., Alihodzic, S. & Kumar, K. A. (1998). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 28, 251–258.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationFlippen-Anderson, J. L., George, C., Gilardi, R., Zajac, W. W., Walters, T. R., Marchand, A., Dave, P. R. & Arney, B. E. (1991). Acta Cryst. C47, 813–817.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationKruger, H. G., Rademeyer, M. & Ramdhani, R. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, o3968–o3970.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationLinden, A., Romański, J., Mlostoń, G. & Heimgartner, H. (2005). Acta Cryst. C61, o221–o226.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMarchand, A. P. (1989). Chem. Rev. 89, 1011–1033.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationMehta, G. & Srikrishna, A. (1997). Chem. Rev. 97, 671–720.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationMlinarić-Majerski, K., Veljković, J., Marchand, A. P. & Ganguly, B. (1998). Tetrahedron, 54, 11381–11386.  Google Scholar
First citationOxford Diffraction (2006). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Abingdon, England.  Google Scholar
First citationSauers, R. R., Zampino, M., Stockl, M., Ferentz, J. & Shams, H. (1983). J. Org. Chem. 48, 1862–1866.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 70| Part 10| October 2014| Pages 246-248
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds