organic compounds
N′-hydroxypyrimidine-2-carboximidamide
ofaSchool of Chemistry, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli 620 024, Tamil Nadu, India
*Correspondence e-mail: tommtrichy@yahoo.co.in
The title compound, C5H6N4O, is approximately planar, with an angle of 11.04 (15)° between the planes of the pyrimidine ring and the non-H atoms of the carboximidamide unit. The molecule adopts an E configuration about the C=N double bond. In the crystal, adjacent molecules are linked by pairs of N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming inversion dimers with an R22(10) ring motif. The dimers are further linked via N—H⋯N and O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds into a sheet structure parallel to the ac plane. The also features N—H⋯O and weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and offset π–π stacking interactions between adjacent pyrimidine rings [centroid–centroid distance = 3.622 (1) Å].
Keywords: crystal structure; pyrimidine-2-carboximidamide; non-covalent interactions; hydrogen bonding; π–π stacking interactions; biological activity.
CCDC reference: 1018015
1. Related literature
For details of non-covalent interactions, see: Desiraju (2007). For the role of intermolecular hydrogen bonds in the design of organic crystals, see: Aakeroy & Seddon (1993). For background to substituted N′-hydroxybenzamidines as intermediates in the synthesis of 1,2,4-oxadiazole derivatives, see: Kundu et al. (2012). For the biological activity of substituted N′-hydroxybenzamidines and 1,2,4-oxadiazole derivatives, see: Sakamoto et al. (2007); Tyrkov & Sukhenko (2004).
2. Experimental
2.1. Crystal data
|
2.3. Refinement
|
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009); cell SAINT (Bruker, 2009); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL and PLATON (Spek, 2009).
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 1018015
10.1107/S1600536814020285/sj5423sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814020285/sj5423Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814020285/sj5423Isup3.cml
A hot methanol solution (20 ml) of N'-hydroxypyrimidine- 2-carboximidamide (69 mg, Aldrich) was warmed over a magnetic stirrer hotplate for a few minutes. The resulting solution was allowed to cool slowly at room temperature. Single crystals of the title compound (I) appeared from the mother liquor after a few days.
O- and N-bound H atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and refined freely [O–H = 0.94 (4) Å and N–H = 0.89 (3) Å and 0.92 (3) Å]. The remaining hydrogen atoms were positioned geometrically [C–H= 0.95 Å] and were refined using a riding model, with Uiso(H)=1.2 Ueq(C).
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2009); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2009); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2009); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound with atom labels. Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level. | |
Fig. 2. The crystal packing of the title compound viewed along the b axis die=rection. H atoms not involved in intermolecular interactions (dashed lines) have been omitted for clarity. |
C5H6N4O | F(000) = 288 |
Mr = 138.14 | Dx = 1.545 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 1905 reflections |
a = 7.4066 (7) Å | θ = 2.8–29.9° |
b = 8.0165 (8) Å | µ = 0.12 mm−1 |
c = 10.2200 (9) Å | T = 100 K |
β = 101.888 (6)° | Plate, colourless |
V = 593.8 (1) Å3 | 0.62 × 0.17 × 0.08 mm |
Z = 4 |
Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer | 1030 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 831 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.047 |
ϕ and ω scans | θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.8° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009) | h = −8→8 |
Tmin = 0.931, Tmax = 0.990 | k = −9→8 |
4073 measured reflections | l = −12→12 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.054 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.181 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
S = 1.13 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.093P)2 + 0.7207P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1030 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
103 parameters | Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.31 e Å−3 |
C5H6N4O | V = 593.8 (1) Å3 |
Mr = 138.14 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 7.4066 (7) Å | µ = 0.12 mm−1 |
b = 8.0165 (8) Å | T = 100 K |
c = 10.2200 (9) Å | 0.62 × 0.17 × 0.08 mm |
β = 101.888 (6)° |
Bruker SMART APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer | 1030 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2009) | 831 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.931, Tmax = 0.990 | Rint = 0.047 |
4073 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.054 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.181 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
S = 1.13 | Δρmax = 0.29 e Å−3 |
1030 reflections | Δρmin = −0.31 e Å−3 |
103 parameters |
Experimental. The crystal was placed in the cold stream of an Oxford Cryosystems Cobra open-flow nitrogen cryostat operating at 100.0 (1) K. |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
O1 | 0.9616 (3) | 0.4128 (2) | 0.15856 (18) | 0.0171 (6) | |
N1 | 0.6515 (3) | 0.0148 (3) | −0.1252 (2) | 0.0159 (6) | |
N2 | 0.8106 (3) | −0.0836 (3) | 0.0883 (2) | 0.0140 (6) | |
N3 | 0.9064 (3) | 0.2423 (3) | 0.1497 (2) | 0.0150 (6) | |
N4 | 0.8007 (3) | 0.3212 (3) | −0.0758 (2) | 0.0155 (6) | |
C1 | 0.5875 (4) | −0.1406 (4) | −0.1538 (3) | 0.0183 (7) | |
H1A | 0.5107 | −0.1612 | −0.2389 | 0.022* | |
C2 | 0.6283 (4) | −0.2713 (4) | −0.0652 (3) | 0.0198 (7) | |
H2A | 0.5801 | −0.3800 | −0.0867 | 0.024* | |
C3 | 0.7425 (4) | −0.2368 (4) | 0.0560 (3) | 0.0183 (7) | |
H3A | 0.7743 | −0.3244 | 0.1191 | 0.022* | |
C4 | 0.7592 (3) | 0.0362 (3) | −0.0043 (2) | 0.0127 (6) | |
C5 | 0.8291 (3) | 0.2095 (3) | 0.0268 (2) | 0.0126 (7) | |
H2N4 | 0.869 (4) | 0.413 (4) | −0.057 (3) | 0.012 (7)* | |
H1N4 | 0.784 (4) | 0.281 (4) | −0.162 (3) | 0.025 (8)* | |
H1O1 | 1.029 (5) | 0.429 (4) | 0.247 (4) | 0.022 (8)* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
O1 | 0.0221 (11) | 0.0123 (11) | 0.0157 (11) | −0.0038 (8) | 0.0012 (9) | −0.0005 (7) |
N1 | 0.0142 (12) | 0.0173 (13) | 0.0169 (12) | −0.0003 (10) | 0.0048 (10) | −0.0023 (9) |
N2 | 0.0130 (12) | 0.0135 (12) | 0.0156 (12) | 0.0008 (9) | 0.0033 (10) | 0.0000 (9) |
N3 | 0.0164 (12) | 0.0098 (12) | 0.0185 (12) | −0.0026 (10) | 0.0027 (10) | −0.0001 (9) |
N4 | 0.0196 (13) | 0.0134 (13) | 0.0130 (12) | −0.0015 (11) | 0.0023 (10) | 0.0016 (9) |
C1 | 0.0139 (14) | 0.0209 (15) | 0.0212 (14) | −0.0018 (12) | 0.0058 (12) | −0.0060 (12) |
C2 | 0.0166 (15) | 0.0129 (14) | 0.0319 (16) | −0.0030 (11) | 0.0096 (13) | −0.0071 (12) |
C3 | 0.0177 (15) | 0.0147 (14) | 0.0246 (15) | 0.0015 (12) | 0.0096 (12) | 0.0004 (11) |
C4 | 0.0092 (13) | 0.0160 (15) | 0.0138 (13) | 0.0006 (11) | 0.0043 (11) | −0.0032 (10) |
C5 | 0.0099 (13) | 0.0137 (14) | 0.0160 (13) | 0.0011 (11) | 0.0065 (11) | 0.0002 (10) |
O1—N3 | 1.424 (3) | N4—H2N4 | 0.89 (3) |
O1—H1O1 | 0.94 (4) | N4—H1N4 | 0.92 (3) |
N1—C4 | 1.336 (3) | C1—C2 | 1.378 (4) |
N1—C1 | 1.343 (4) | C1—H1A | 0.9500 |
N2—C3 | 1.343 (4) | C2—C3 | 1.376 (4) |
N2—C4 | 1.347 (3) | C2—H2A | 0.9500 |
N3—C5 | 1.295 (3) | C3—H3A | 0.9500 |
N4—C5 | 1.362 (3) | C4—C5 | 1.494 (4) |
N3—O1—H1O1 | 106.1 (18) | C3—C2—H2A | 121.6 |
C4—N1—C1 | 116.0 (2) | C1—C2—H2A | 121.6 |
C3—N2—C4 | 116.2 (2) | N2—C3—C2 | 122.4 (3) |
C5—N3—O1 | 108.7 (2) | N2—C3—H3A | 118.8 |
C5—N4—H2N4 | 112.9 (18) | C2—C3—H3A | 118.8 |
C5—N4—H1N4 | 118 (2) | N1—C4—N2 | 125.9 (2) |
H2N4—N4—H1N4 | 117 (3) | N1—C4—C5 | 115.6 (2) |
N1—C1—C2 | 122.8 (2) | N2—C4—C5 | 118.5 (2) |
N1—C1—H1A | 118.6 | N3—C5—N4 | 125.5 (2) |
C2—C1—H1A | 118.6 | N3—C5—C4 | 117.4 (2) |
C3—C2—C1 | 116.7 (3) | N4—C5—C4 | 117.1 (2) |
C4—N1—C1—C2 | 0.2 (4) | C3—N2—C4—C5 | 179.3 (2) |
N1—C1—C2—C3 | −1.1 (4) | O1—N3—C5—N4 | −1.7 (3) |
C4—N2—C3—C2 | 0.8 (4) | O1—N3—C5—C4 | −179.51 (19) |
C1—C2—C3—N2 | 0.5 (4) | N1—C4—C5—N3 | 168.3 (2) |
C1—N1—C4—N2 | 1.3 (4) | N2—C4—C5—N3 | −12.7 (3) |
C1—N1—C4—C5 | −179.8 (2) | N1—C4—C5—N4 | −9.7 (3) |
C3—N2—C4—N1 | −1.8 (4) | N2—C4—C5—N4 | 169.3 (2) |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N4—H2N4···O1i | 0.89 (3) | 2.27 (3) | 2.996 (3) | 139 (3) |
N4—H1N4···N3ii | 0.92 (3) | 2.30 (3) | 3.106 (3) | 146 (3) |
O1—H1O1···N2iii | 0.95 (4) | 1.85 (4) | 2.783 (3) | 167 (3) |
C3—H3A···O1iv | 0.95 | 2.51 | 3.305 (4) | 141 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, −y+1, −z; (ii) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (iii) −x+2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) x, y−1, z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N4—H2N4···O1i | 0.89 (3) | 2.27 (3) | 2.996 (3) | 139 (3) |
N4—H1N4···N3ii | 0.92 (3) | 2.30 (3) | 3.106 (3) | 146 (3) |
O1—H1O1···N2iii | 0.95 (4) | 1.85 (4) | 2.783 (3) | 167 (3) |
C3—H3A···O1iv | 0.9500 | 2.5100 | 3.305 (4) | 141.00 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, −y+1, −z; (ii) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (iii) −x+2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) x, y−1, z. |
Acknowledgements
NJJ thanks the UGC–SAP for the award of an RFSMS. PTM thanks the UGC for a one-time BSR grant.
References
Aakeroy, C. B. & Seddon, K. R. (1993). Chem. Soc. Rev. 22, 397–407. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bruker (2009). SADABS, APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Desiraju, G. R. (2007). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 8342–8356. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kundu, M., Singh, B., Ghosh, T., Maiti, B. C. & Maity, T. K. (2012). Indian J. Chem. Sect. B, 51, 493–497. Google Scholar
Sakamoto, T., Cullen, M. D., Hartman, T. L., Watson, K. M., Buckheit, R. W., Pannecouque, C., DeClercq, E. & Cushman, M. (2007). J. Med. Chem. 50, 3314–3319. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Tyrkov, A. G. & Sukhenko, L. T. (2004). Pharm. Chem. J. 38, 30–38. CrossRef Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
Supramolecular architectures assembled via various delicate noncovalent interactions such as hydrogen bonds, π—π stacking and electrostatic interactions, have attracted intense interest in recent years because of their fascinating structural diversity and potential applications for functional materials (Desiraju, 2007). In particular, the application of intermolecular hydrogen bonding is a well known and efficient tool in the field of organic crystal design owing to their strength and directional properties (Aakeroy & Seddon, 1993). Substituted N'-hydroxybenzamidines are important intermediates obtained during the synthesis of pharmaceuticaly important 1,2,4-oxadiazole derivatives (Kundu et al., 2012). 1,2,4-oxadiazole derivatives are well known for their biological activities such as for anti-HIV (Sakamoto et al., 2007) and anti-microbial applications (Tyrkov & Sukhenko, 2004). Herein, we report the crystal structure determination of the title compound, (I).
The asymmetric unit of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1. The essentially planar pyrimidine ring [N1/N2/C1–C4, maximum deviation of 0.009 (2) Å at atom C4] forms a dihedral angle of 11.04 (15)° with the hydroxyacetimidamide (N4/C5/N3/O1). The compound adopts an E configuration across the C5═N3 double bond, as the OH group and benzene ring are on opposite sides of the double bond while the hydrogen atom of the hydroxy group is directed away from the NH2 group. The bond lengths and angles are within normal ranges.
In the crystal packing, molecules are linked by a pair of N4—H2N4···O1i hydrogen bonds (symmetry code in Table 1) into an inversion dimer, forming an R22(10) ring motif. These molecules are self-assembled via N4—H1N4···N3ii hydrogen bonds (graph-set notation C(4); symmetry code as in Table 1), which interconnect the dimers resulting in a sheet parallel to the ac plane as shown in Fig 2. Furthermore, the crystal structure is stabilized by O1–H1O1···N2iii and weak C3—H3A···O1iv hydrogen bonds (symmetry code as in Table 1) and π–π stacking interactions between the pyrimidine (N1/N2/C1-C4) rings [centroid-centroid distance = 3.622 (1) Å; (symmetry code: 1-x, - y, -z)].