organic compounds
of 2-bromobenzoic acid at 120 K: a redetermination
aFaculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, W. Stwosza 63, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland
*Correspondence e-mail: art@chem.univ.gda.pl
The 7H5BrO2, was originally studied using photographic data at room temperature with Cu Kα radiation [Ferguson & Sim (1962). Acta Cryst. 15, 346–350]. The present study was undertaken at 120 K with a CCD diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation, and resulted in improved geometrical parameters. In the molecule, the carboxy group is inclined to the benzene ring by 18.7 (2)° and there is a close intramolecular Br⋯O contact of 3.009 (3) Å. In the crystal, molecules are linked by pairs of O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming inversion dimers with the classical R22(8) ring motif for carboxylic acids. Neighbouring dimers are linked by weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming tapes propagating in [1-10]. Adjacent tapes interact by slipped parallel π–π interactions [inter-centroid distance = 3.991 (2), interplanar distance = 3.509 (2) Å, slippage = 1.900 Å] to form columns approximately along the b-axis direction. Neighbouring columns interact dispersively, forming a three-dimensional framework structure.
of the title compound, CKeywords: crystal structure; 2-bromobenzoic acid; redetermination; hydrogen bonds; π–π interactions.
CCDC reference: 1024798
1. Related literature
For the original report of the unit-cell dimensions, ). For uses of the title compound in organic synthesis, see: Evano et al. (2008); Wolf et al. (2006), and for its physicochemical properties, see: Govindarajan et al. (2011); Sabbah & Aguilar (1996); Swaminathan et al. (2009). For related structures involving the title compound, see: Das et al. (2012); Wales et al. (2012). For reports on Br⋯O interactions, see: Jones & Lozano (2004); Saeed et al. (2013); Singh et al. (2009).
and structure of the title compound, see: Ferguson & Sim (19622. Experimental
2.1. Crystal data
|
2.3. Refinement
|
|
Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2008); cell CrysAlis CCD; data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2008); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEPII (Burnett & Johnson, 1976); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PLATON (Spek, 2009).
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 1024798
10.1107/S160053681402087X/su2783sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681402087X/su2783Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681402087X/su2783Isup3.cml
The 2-bromobenzoic acid was purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used without further purification. The single crystals suitable for X-ray investigations were grown by means of slow evaporation of a mixture of ethanol and water (1:1; v:v) solution (m.p. 422.6).
The OH H-atom was located in a difference Fourier map and refined with a distance restraint: O-H = 0.82 (2) Å. The C-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically and constrained to ride on their parent atoms: C–H = 0.93 Å with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).
Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2008); cell
CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2008); data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2008); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEPII (Burnett & Johnson, 1976); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).C7H5BrO2 | F(000) = 784 |
Mr = 201.01 | Dx = 1.987 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Melting point: 422.6 K |
Hall symbol: -C 2yc | Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å |
a = 14.7955 (4) Å | Cell parameters from 10883 reflections |
b = 3.99062 (15) Å | θ = 3.9–67.3° |
c = 22.9240 (8) Å | µ = 7.76 mm−1 |
β = 96.906 (3)° | T = 120 K |
V = 1343.69 (8) Å3 | Block, white |
Z = 8 | 0.55 × 0.35 × 0.28 mm |
Oxford Diffraction Gemini R Ultra Ruby CCD diffractometer | 1201 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1172 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.067 |
Detector resolution: 10.4002 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 67.3°, θmin = 3.9° |
ω scans | h = −17→17 |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2008) | k = −4→4 |
Tmin = 0.722, Tmax = 0.991 | l = −27→27 |
10883 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.091 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
S = 1.18 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.048P)2 + 4.6943P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1201 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
95 parameters | Δρmax = 0.82 e Å−3 |
1 restraint | Δρmin = −0.52 e Å−3 |
C7H5BrO2 | V = 1343.69 (8) Å3 |
Mr = 201.01 | Z = 8 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Cu Kα radiation |
a = 14.7955 (4) Å | µ = 7.76 mm−1 |
b = 3.99062 (15) Å | T = 120 K |
c = 22.9240 (8) Å | 0.55 × 0.35 × 0.28 mm |
β = 96.906 (3)° |
Oxford Diffraction Gemini R Ultra Ruby CCD diffractometer | 1201 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Oxford Diffraction, 2008) | 1172 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.722, Tmax = 0.991 | Rint = 0.067 |
10883 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035 | 1 restraint |
wR(F2) = 0.091 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
S = 1.18 | Δρmax = 0.82 e Å−3 |
1201 reflections | Δρmin = −0.52 e Å−3 |
95 parameters |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
C1 | 0.3119 (2) | 0.3168 (9) | 0.40413 (14) | 0.0222 (7) | |
C2 | 0.3109 (2) | 0.1534 (9) | 0.34999 (14) | 0.0230 (7) | |
C3 | 0.2293 (2) | 0.0629 (9) | 0.31713 (16) | 0.0268 (8) | |
H3 | 0.2296 | −0.0469 | 0.2814 | 0.032* | |
C4 | 0.1473 (2) | 0.1375 (10) | 0.33802 (16) | 0.0297 (8) | |
H4 | 0.0927 | 0.0740 | 0.3164 | 0.036* | |
C5 | 0.1463 (2) | 0.3045 (10) | 0.39040 (15) | 0.0277 (8) | |
H5 | 0.0912 | 0.3580 | 0.4038 | 0.033* | |
C6 | 0.2278 (2) | 0.3931 (10) | 0.42318 (15) | 0.0265 (8) | |
H6 | 0.2266 | 0.5057 | 0.4586 | 0.032* | |
C7 | 0.3963 (2) | 0.4020 (9) | 0.44374 (15) | 0.0243 (7) | |
O8 | 0.47061 (15) | 0.2776 (8) | 0.44031 (11) | 0.0337 (6) | |
O9 | 0.38191 (16) | 0.6217 (8) | 0.48460 (11) | 0.0315 (6) | |
H9 | 0.427 (2) | 0.659 (12) | 0.5071 (15) | 0.033 (11)* | |
Br10 | 0.41826 (2) | 0.04521 (11) | 0.315985 (15) | 0.03005 (19) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
C1 | 0.0158 (15) | 0.0262 (18) | 0.0240 (16) | 0.0011 (13) | −0.0009 (12) | 0.0025 (14) |
C2 | 0.0188 (15) | 0.0263 (18) | 0.0232 (16) | 0.0026 (13) | −0.0001 (12) | 0.0022 (14) |
C3 | 0.0231 (18) | 0.031 (2) | 0.0248 (17) | 0.0008 (14) | −0.0028 (14) | −0.0001 (14) |
C4 | 0.0181 (16) | 0.036 (2) | 0.0326 (18) | −0.0030 (15) | −0.0053 (13) | 0.0049 (16) |
C5 | 0.0154 (15) | 0.036 (2) | 0.0308 (17) | 0.0016 (14) | 0.0007 (13) | 0.0050 (16) |
C6 | 0.0192 (17) | 0.037 (2) | 0.0225 (16) | 0.0034 (15) | 0.0012 (13) | 0.0033 (15) |
C7 | 0.0209 (17) | 0.0309 (19) | 0.0207 (16) | −0.0011 (14) | 0.0009 (13) | 0.0034 (14) |
O8 | 0.0147 (12) | 0.0520 (18) | 0.0326 (13) | 0.0064 (11) | −0.0052 (9) | −0.0121 (12) |
O9 | 0.0183 (12) | 0.0472 (17) | 0.0277 (13) | 0.0030 (12) | −0.0035 (10) | −0.0109 (12) |
Br10 | 0.0190 (2) | 0.0420 (3) | 0.0286 (3) | 0.00389 (14) | 0.00077 (16) | −0.00733 (15) |
C1—C2 | 1.400 (5) | C4—H4 | 0.9300 |
C1—C6 | 1.401 (5) | C5—C6 | 1.388 (5) |
C1—C7 | 1.492 (5) | C5—H5 | 0.9300 |
C2—C3 | 1.392 (5) | C6—H6 | 0.9300 |
C2—Br10 | 1.901 (3) | C7—O8 | 1.217 (4) |
C3—C4 | 1.389 (5) | C7—O9 | 1.319 (5) |
C3—H3 | 0.9300 | O9—H9 | 0.803 (19) |
C4—C5 | 1.375 (5) | ||
C2—C1—C6 | 117.5 (3) | C3—C4—H4 | 119.8 |
C2—C1—C7 | 124.4 (3) | C4—C5—C6 | 119.8 (3) |
C6—C1—C7 | 118.1 (3) | C4—C5—H5 | 120.1 |
C3—C2—C1 | 121.1 (3) | C6—C5—H5 | 120.1 |
C3—C2—Br10 | 115.6 (3) | C5—C6—C1 | 121.5 (3) |
C1—C2—Br10 | 123.3 (2) | C5—C6—H6 | 119.2 |
C4—C3—C2 | 119.7 (3) | C1—C6—H6 | 119.2 |
C4—C3—H3 | 120.2 | O8—C7—O9 | 122.8 (3) |
C2—C3—H3 | 120.2 | O8—C7—C1 | 124.3 (3) |
C5—C4—C3 | 120.4 (3) | O9—C7—C1 | 112.9 (3) |
C5—C4—H4 | 119.8 | C7—O9—H9 | 113 (3) |
C6—C1—C2—C3 | −1.6 (5) | C4—C5—C6—C1 | 0.1 (6) |
C7—C1—C2—C3 | 175.8 (3) | C2—C1—C6—C5 | 1.3 (5) |
C6—C1—C2—Br10 | 177.6 (3) | C7—C1—C6—C5 | −176.3 (3) |
C7—C1—C2—Br10 | −4.9 (5) | C2—C1—C7—O8 | −17.1 (6) |
C1—C2—C3—C4 | 0.5 (6) | C6—C1—C7—O8 | 160.4 (4) |
Br10—C2—C3—C4 | −178.8 (3) | C2—C1—C7—O9 | 164.8 (3) |
C2—C3—C4—C5 | 1.0 (6) | C6—C1—C7—O9 | −17.7 (5) |
C3—C4—C5—C6 | −1.3 (6) |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O9—H9···O8i | 0.81 (3) | 1.84 (3) | 2.643 (3) | 177 (5) |
C5—H5···O8ii | 0.93 | 2.65 | 3.514 (3) | 153 |
C6—H6···O9iii | 0.93 | 2.64 | 3.417 (3) | 141 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) x−1/2, y+1/2, z; (iii) −x+1/2, −y+3/2, −z+1. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O9—H9···O8i | 0.81 (3) | 1.84 (3) | 2.643 (3) | 177 (5) |
C5—H5···O8ii | 0.93 | 2.65 | 3.514 (3) | 153 |
C6—H6···O9iii | 0.93 | 2.64 | 3.417 (3) | 141 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) x−1/2, y+1/2, z; (iii) −x+1/2, −y+3/2, −z+1. |
Acknowledgements
This study was financed by the State Funds for Scientific Research through the National Science Centre (NCN) in Poland, grant No. 2011/01/D/ST4/04943 (Contract No. UMO-2011/01/D/ST4/04943).
References
Burnett, M. N. & Johnson, C. K. (1976). ORTEPII. Report ORNL-6895. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, USA. Google Scholar
Das, U. K., Puranik, V. G. & Dastidar, P. (2012). Cryst. Growth Des. 12, 5864–5868. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Evano, G., Blanchard, N. & Toumi, M. (2008). Chem. Rev. 108, 3054–3131. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ferguson, G. & Sim, G. A. (1962). Acta Cryst. 15, 346–350. CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Govindarajan, M., Ganasan, K., Periandy, S., Mohan, S. & Tedlamelekot, F. (2011). Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 779, 2003–2011. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Jones, P. G. & Lozano, V. (2004). Acta Cryst. C60, o876–o878. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Oxford Diffraction (2008). CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, England. Google Scholar
Sabbah, R. & Aguilar, A. R. (1996). Struct. Chem. 77, 383–390. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Saeed, A., Qasim, M. & Simpson, J. (2013). Acta Cryst. C69, 790–793. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Singh, V. P., Singh, H. B. & Butcher, R. J. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o2761. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Swaminathan, J., Ramalingam, M., Saleem, H., Sethuraman, V. & Ameen, M. T. (2009). Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 774, 1247–1253. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Wales, C., Thomas, L. H. & Wilson, C. C. (2012). CrystEngComm, 14, 7264–7274. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wolf, C., Liu, S., Mei, X., August, A. T. & Casimir, M. D. (2006). J. Org. Chem. 71, 3270–3273. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
2-Bromobenzoic acid is a reagent widely used in organic synthesis, for example in cross-coupling reactions (Evano et al., 2008; Wolf et al., 2006). The physicochemical properties of title compound, such as thermodynamic (Sabbah & Aguilar, 1996) and spectroscopic (Govindarajan et al., 2011; Swaminathan et al., 2009) properties, were studied in literature. In 1962, Ferguson and Sim (Ferguson & Sim, 1962) determined the crystal structure of the title compound (a = 14.82 Å, b = 4.10 Å, c = 25.90 Å, β = 118.26°, V = 1386.2 Å3, R = 13.20 %), using photographic data at room temperature. Redetermination of the crystal structure of 2-bromobenzoic acid at 120 K shows, that the unit cell dimensions (see: Experimental section) differs from those reported previously.
The bond lengths and angles characterizing the geometry of molecule of the title compound (Fig. 1) are similar to those found in other structures containing 2-bromobenzoic acid (Das et al., 2012; Wales et al., 2012). The benzene ring makes an angle of 18.7 (2) ° with the mean plane of the carboxy group. There is also a close intramolecular Br10···O8 contact [3.009 (3) Å; as shown in Fig. 1].
In the crystal, molecules are linked into inversion R22(8) dimers by pairs of O9–H9···O8i hydrogen bonds (Table 1 and Fig. 2). Neighbouring dimers are linked by C5–H5···O8ii and C6–H6···O9iii interactions to produce tapes along [1 -1 0] (Table 1 and Fig. 2). Adjacent tapes interact by weak π–π interactions [Cg···Cgiv = 3.991 (2) Å; Cg is the centroid of the benzene ring C1-C6; interplanar distances = 3.509 (2) Å; slippage 1.900 Å; symmetry code: (iv) x, y-1, z] to form stacked columns approximately along the b-axis (Fig. 3). The neighbouring columns interact dispersively to form a three-dimensional framework structure (Fig. 3).