Crystal structure of 6,6′-dimethyl-2H,2′H-3,4′-bichromene-2,2′-dione

Pujar, K.K.; Kulkarni, M.V.; Anil Kumar, G.N.

doi:10.1107/S1600536814021825

research communications

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 70| Part 11| November 2014| Pages 319-321

doi:10.1107/S1600536814021825

Open

access

Crystal structure of 6,6′-dimethyl-2H,2′H-3,4′-bichromene-2,2′-dione

Kiran K. Pujar,^a Manohar V. Kulkarni ^a ^* and G. N. Anil Kumar ^b

^aDepartment of Chemistry, Karnatak University, Dharwad 580 010, India, and ^bDepartment of Physics, M S Ramaiah Institute of Technology, MSRIT Post, Bangalore 560 054, India
^*Correspondence e-mail: anilgn@msrit.edu

Edited by H. Ishida, Okayama University, Japan (Received 12 September 2014; accepted 3 October 2014; online 11 October 2014)

In the title compound, C₂₀H₁₄O₄, the dihedral angle between the two coumarin ring systems is 52.37 (19)°, showing a gauche arrangement across the C—C bond which links the two units. The carbonyl groups of the two coumarin units adopt an s-trans arrangement. In the crystal, pairs of C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and π–π interactions [centroid–centroid distance = 3.631 (2) Å] connect the molecules into inversion dimers.

Keywords: crystal structure; bicoumarin; hydrogen bonds; π–π interactions.

CCDC reference: 1027466

1. Chemical context

Bicoumarins, in which two coumarin ring systems are directly linked through a C—C bond, are a group of regio-isomers which are of synthetic interest (Ilyas & Parveen, 1996 ; Dubovik et al., 2004 ; Frasinyuk et al., 2012 ). Their natural occurrence and structural diversity originate from various positions of the linkage which can lead to pyran–pyran-linked bicoumarins, viz., 3-3′, 3-4′, 4-4′, or pyran–benzene-linked bicoumarins wherein the points of linkage are C3/C4 with the C5–C8 positions in the second coumarin moiety (Hussain et al., 2012 ). 3-3′ Bicoumarins isolated from Chinese medicinal plants and Mediterranean sponges (Panichayupakaranant et al., 1998 ) have been shown to exhibit insecticidal and anti-proliferative properties. 8-8′ Bicoumarins have shown antileukemic, nematocidal and cardiotoxic activity as well as antischistosomial, sedative and hypotensive effects (Ulubelen et al., 1986 ). 6-8′ Bicoumarins have been evaluated for urease inhibitory activity (Ayaz et al., 2006 ). Atropisomerism has been observed for naturally occurring 3-6′ bicoumarins (Zhan et al., 2003 ). 5-5′ Bicoumarins competitively inhibit epoxide reductase of vitamin K, preventing the reduction of vitamin K into hydroquinone, leading to their anticoagulant activity (Zhou et al., 2009 ). 3-8′ Bicoumarins exhibit cytotoxicity towards human solid tumour cell lines, affording ED₅₀ values of 7.5, 55, 5.8 µg/ml against non-small-cell-lung carcinoma A-549, breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7, and colon adeno-carcinoma HT-29 cells respectively (Tepaske & Gloer, 1992 ).

In view of the above cited activities of directly linked coumarin dimers, the present work reports the synthesis under metal-free conditions of a new 4-3′ bicoumarin and its structure.

2. Structural commentary

The molecular structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1. The packing viewed along the b axis (Fig. 2) shows the existence of intermolecular C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds between the carbonyl O4 of one coumarin moiety and the aromatic H8 of the second unit (Table 1), which has also been observed in a 3-5′ bicoumarin (Fun et al., 2009 ). The two coumarin rings exhibit an s-trans arrangement across the C4—C11 bond for the two double bonds viz. C3=C4 and C11=C12. The non-planar nature of the bi-heterocyclic system is revealed through the torsion angles C3—C4—C11—C12 [−52.37 (19)°] and C10—C4—C11—C19 [−59.32 (17)°], which almost corresponds to a gauche conformation.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
C8—H8⋯O4ⁱ	0.93	2.53	3.330 (2)	145
Symmetry code: (i) -x+1, -y, -z.

Figure 1
The molecular structure of the title compound, showing the atom-labelling scheme and with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.

Figure 2
A packing diagram of the title compound, viewed along the b axis. Dashed lines indicate C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and π–π interactions. H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding have been omitted for clarity.

3. Supramolecular features

In the crystal, pairs of C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and π–π interactions [Cg1⋯Cg1ⁱ = 3.631 (2); slippage = 1.491 Å; Cg1 is the centroid of the C5–C10 ring; symmetry code: (i) 1 − x, −y, −z] connect molecules into inversion dimers (Fig. 2).

4. Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.35, updates Feb 2014; Groom & Allen, 2014 ) revealed two related structures, viz. 7,7′,8,8′-tetramethoxy-4,4′-dimethyl-3,5′-bichromene-2,2′-dione (Fun et al., 2009) and 7,7′-dihydroxy-4,4′-dimethyl-3,4-dihydro-2H,2′H-4,6′-bichromene-2,2′-dione (Pereira Silva et al., 2011 ). In these two compounds, the dihedral angles between the coumarin ring systems are 79.93 (3) and 88.07 (2)°, respectively. The corresponding angle in the title compound is 52.37 (19)°.

5. Synthesis and Crystallization

6-Methylcoumarin 4-acetic acid (0.01 mol) and 5-methylsalicylaldehyde (0.01 mol) were taken in a round-bottomed flask containing (1.5 eq) NaH and 3 ml of acetic anhydride. The flask, fitted with a guard tube, was stirred for 1.5 h. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC, the solid that separated was filtered off and washed with diethyl ether and again with 5% NaHCO₃ to remove unreacted 6-methylcoumarin 4-acetic acid. Then the solid was dried and recrystallized from ethanol. Crystals suitable for diffraction studies were obtained through slow evaporation from a DMF solution.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. C-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically and allowed to ride on their parent atoms, with C—H = 0.93–0.98 Å and U_iso(H) = 1.2U_eq(C) or 1.5U_eq(C_methyl).

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	C₂₀H₁₄O₄
M_r	318.31
Crystal system, space group	Triclinic, P $[\overline{1}]$
Temperature (K)	296
a, b, c (Å)	7.834 (1), 8.0455 (9), 12.7952 (15)
α, β, γ (°)	79.492 (5), 77.096 (4), 86.637 (5)
V (Å³)	772.78 (16)
Z	2
Radiation type	Mo Kα
μ (mm⁻¹)	0.10
Crystal size (mm)	0.35 × 0.31 × 0.25

Data collection
Diffractometer	Bruker SMART CCD area-detector
Absorption correction	Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 )
T_min, T_max	0.954, 0.964
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	12862, 3499, 2509
R_int	0.027
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.648

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.046, 0.140, 1.05
No. of reflections	3499
No. of parameters	219
H-atom treatment	H-atom parameters constrained
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.19, −0.20
Computer programs: SMART and SAINT (Bruker, 1998 ), SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993 ), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ), CAMERON (Watkin et al., 1996 ), PARST (Nardelli, 1996 ) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ).

Supporting information

CCDC reference: 1027466

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814021825/is5375sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814021825/is5375Isup2.hkl

Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536814021825/is5375Isup3.cml

checkCIF report

Chemical context top

Bicoumarins, in which two coumarin ring systems are directly linked through a C—C bond, are a group of regio-isomers which are of synthetic interest (Ilyas & Parveen, 1996; Dubovik et al., 2004; Frasinyuk et al., 2012). Their natural occurrence and structural diversity originate from various positions of the linkage which can lead to pyran–pyran-linked bicoumarins, viz., 3-3', 3-4', 4-4', or pyran–benzene-linked bicoumarins wherein the points of linkage are C3/C4 with the C5–C8 positions in the second coumarin moiety (Hussain et al., 2012). 3-3' Bicoumarins isolated from Chinese medicinal plants and Mediterranean sponges (Panichayupakaranant et al., 1998) have been shown to exhibit insecticidal and anti-proliferative properties. 8-8' Bicoumarins have shown antileukemic, nematocidal and cardiotoxic activity as well as antischistosomial, sedative and hypotensive effects (Ulubelen et al., 1986). 6-8' Bicoumarins have been evaluated for urease inhibitory activity (Ayaz et al., 2006). Atropisomerism has been observed for naturally occurring 3-6' bicoumarins (Zhan et al., 2003). 5-5' Bicoumarins competitively inhibit epoxide reductase of vitamin K, preventing the reduction of vitamin K into hydriquinone, leading to their anticoagulant activity (Zhou et al., 2009 ). 3-8' Bicoumarins exhibit cytotoxicity towards human solid tumour cell lines, affording ED₅₀ values of 7.5, 55, 5.8 µg/ml against non-small-cell-lung carcinoma A-549, breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7, and colon adeno-carcinoma HT-29 cells respectively (Tepaske & Gloer, 1992). In view of the above cited activities of directly linked coumarin dimers, the present work reports the synthesis under metal-free conditions of a new 4-3' bicoumarin and its structure.

Structural commentary top

The molecular structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1. The packing viewed along the b axis (Fig. 2) shows the existence of intermolecular C—H···O hydrogen bonds between the carbonyl O4 of one coumarin moiety and the aromatic H8 of the second unit (Table 1), which has also been observed in a 3-5' bicoumarin (Fun et al., 2009). The two coumarin rings exhibit an s-cis [s-trans in Abstract?] arrangement across the C4—C11 bond for the two double bonds viz. C3═C4 and C11═C12. The non-planar nature of the bi-heterocyclic system is revealed through the torsion angles C3—C4—C11—C12 [-52.37 (19)°] and C10—C4—C11—C19 [-59.32 (17)°], which almost corresponds to a gauche conformation

Supramolecular features top

In the crystal, pairs of C—H···O hydrogen bonds and π–π interactions [Cg1···Cg1ⁱ = 3.631 (2); slippage = 1.491 Å; Cg1 is the centroid of the C5–C10 ring; symmetry code: (i) 1 - x, -y, -z] connect molecules into inversion dimers (Fig. 2).

Database survey top

\ A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.35, updates Feb 2014; Groom & Allen, 2014) gave two related structures, i.e. 7,7',8,8'-tetramethoxy-4,4'-dimethyl-3,5'-bichromene-2,2'-dione (Fun et al., 2009) and 7,7'-dihydroxy-4,4'-dimethyl-3,4-dihydro-2H,2'H-4,6'-\ bichromene-2,2'-dione (Pereira Silva et al., 2011). In these two compounds, the dihedral angles between the coumarin ring systems are 79.93 (3) and 88.07 (2)°, respectively. The corresponding angle in the title compound is 52.37 (19)°.

Synthesis and Crystallization top

6-Methylcoumarin 4-acetic acid (0.01 mol) and 5-methylsalicylaldehyde (0.01 mol) were taken in a round-bottomed flask containing (1.5 eq) NaH and 3 ml of acetic anhydride. The flask, fitted with a guard tube, was stirred for 1.5 hours. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC, the solid that separated was filtered off and washed with diethyl ether and again with 5% NaHCO₃ to remove unreacted 6-methylcoumarin 4-acetic acid. Then the solid was dried and recrystallized from ethanol. Crystals suitable for diffraction studies were obtained through slow evaporation from a DMF solution.

Refinement top

Related literature top

For the synthesis of bicoumarins, see: Ilyas et al. (1996); Dubovik et al. (2004); Frasinyuk et al. (2012). For natural occurrence of bicoumarins, see: Hussain et al. (2012). For insecticidal and anti-proliferative properties of 3–3' bicoumarins, see: Panichayupkaranant et al. (1998). For urease inhibition by 6–6' bicoumarins, see: Ayaz et al. (2006). For atropisomerism of 3–6' bicoumarins, see: Zhan et al. (2003). For cytotoxic activities by 3–8' bicoumarins, see: Tepaske et al. (1992).

Computing details top

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1998); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012) and CAMERON (Watkin et al., 1996); software used to prepare material for publication: PARST (Nardelli, 1996) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Figures top

Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound, showing the atom-labelling scheme and with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.

Fig. 2. A packing diagram of the title compound, viewed along the b axis. Dashed lines indicate C—H···O hydrogen bonds and π–π interactions. H atoms not involved in hydrogen bonding have been omitted for clarity.

6,6'-Dimethyl-2H,2'H-3,4'-bichromene-2,2'-dione top

Crystal data top

C₂₀H₁₄O₄	Z = 2
M_r = 318.31	F(000) = 332
Triclinic, P1	D_x = 1.368 Mg m⁻³
Hall symbol: -P 1	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.834 (1) Å	Cell parameters from 560 reflections
b = 8.0455 (9) Å	θ = 1.7°
c = 12.7952 (15) Å	µ = 0.10 mm⁻¹
α = 79.492 (5)°	T = 296 K
β = 77.096 (4)°	Block, white
γ = 86.637 (5)°	0.35 × 0.31 × 0.25 mm
V = 772.78 (16) Å³

Data collection top

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer	3499 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube	2509 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator	R_int = 0.027
ϕ and ω scans	θ_max = 27.4°, θ_min = 1.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)	h = −10→10
T_min = 0.954, T_max = 0.964	k = −10→9
12862 measured reflections	l = −16→16

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full	Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.046	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F²) = 0.140	H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0661P)² + 0.1433P] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
3499 reflections	(Δ/σ)_max < 0.001
219 parameters	Δρ_max = 0.19 e Å⁻³
0 restraints	Δρ_min = −0.20 e Å⁻³

Crystal data top

C₂₀H₁₄O₄	γ = 86.637 (5)°
M_r = 318.31	V = 772.78 (16) Å³
Triclinic, P1	Z = 2
a = 7.834 (1) Å	Mo Kα radiation
b = 8.0455 (9) Å	µ = 0.10 mm⁻¹
c = 12.7952 (15) Å	T = 296 K
α = 79.492 (5)°	0.35 × 0.31 × 0.25 mm
β = 77.096 (4)°

Data collection top

Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer	3499 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)	2509 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
T_min = 0.954, T_max = 0.964	R_int = 0.027
12862 measured reflections

Refinement top

R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.046	0 restraints
wR(F²) = 0.140	H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05	Δρ_max = 0.19 e Å⁻³
3499 reflections	Δρ_min = −0.20 e Å⁻³
219 parameters

Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F² against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F², conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F². The threshold expression of F² > σ(F²) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F² are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
O1	0.81516 (14)	0.16314 (15)	−0.10679 (8)	0.0577 (3)
O2	0.9332 (2)	0.4150 (2)	−0.14906 (10)	0.0853 (4)
O3	0.61479 (14)	0.15867 (15)	0.41223 (8)	0.0569 (3)
O4	0.48324 (15)	0.13864 (15)	0.27995 (9)	0.0603 (3)
C2	0.8773 (2)	0.2996 (2)	−0.07754 (13)	0.0583 (4)
C3	0.8662 (2)	0.2942 (2)	0.03783 (11)	0.0508 (4)
H3	0.9052	0.3863	0.06	0.061*
C4	0.80175 (18)	0.16160 (17)	0.11386 (11)	0.0405 (3)
C5	0.6808 (2)	−0.13246 (17)	0.15031 (12)	0.0478 (4)
H5	0.6783	−0.1418	0.2242	0.057*
C6	0.6220 (2)	−0.26560 (18)	0.11392 (14)	0.0547 (4)
C7	0.6262 (2)	−0.2483 (2)	0.00295 (15)	0.0595 (5)
H7	0.5852	−0.3356	−0.0229	0.071*
C8	0.6891 (2)	−0.1057 (2)	−0.06922 (13)	0.0560 (4)
H8	0.6905	−0.0967	−0.1429	0.067*
C9	0.75025 (18)	0.0239 (2)	−0.03095 (12)	0.0460 (4)
C10	0.74384 (18)	0.01530 (17)	0.08010 (11)	0.0414 (3)
C11	0.79180 (18)	0.16893 (16)	0.23068 (10)	0.0386 (3)
C12	0.93182 (19)	0.20659 (19)	0.26592 (11)	0.0450 (3)
H12	1.0386	0.2245	0.2165	0.054*
C13	0.92131 (19)	0.21999 (17)	0.37755 (11)	0.0433 (3)
C14	1.0631 (2)	0.2583 (2)	0.41766 (13)	0.0540 (4)
H14	1.1719	0.277	0.3705	0.065*
C15	1.0449 (2)	0.2688 (2)	0.52638 (13)	0.0572 (4)
C16	0.8808 (3)	0.2377 (2)	0.59489 (13)	0.0679 (5)
H16	0.8669	0.2432	0.6683	0.081*
C17	0.7393 (3)	0.1995 (2)	0.55805 (13)	0.0680 (5)
H17	0.6312	0.1788	0.6056	0.082*
C18	0.7602 (2)	0.19221 (18)	0.44840 (11)	0.0472 (4)
C19	0.6205 (2)	0.15326 (17)	0.30488 (11)	0.0440 (3)
C20	1.1984 (3)	0.3134 (3)	0.56865 (17)	0.0830 (6)
H20A	1.2798	0.2195	0.5708	0.124*
H20B	1.1575	0.3386	0.6407	0.124*
H20C	1.2554	0.4103	0.5214	0.124*
C21	0.5504 (3)	−0.4212 (2)	0.19269 (18)	0.0784 (6)
H21A	0.6207	−0.4505	0.2462	0.118*
H21B	0.5529	−0.5131	0.1539	0.118*
H21C	0.4319	−0.3991	0.2282	0.118*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
O1	0.0565 (7)	0.0856 (8)	0.0318 (5)	−0.0030 (6)	−0.0070 (5)	−0.0147 (5)
O2	0.1050 (11)	0.1025 (10)	0.0394 (6)	−0.0284 (8)	−0.0057 (7)	0.0071 (7)
O3	0.0581 (7)	0.0744 (7)	0.0360 (5)	−0.0229 (5)	0.0050 (5)	−0.0154 (5)
O4	0.0469 (7)	0.0795 (8)	0.0575 (7)	−0.0158 (6)	−0.0036 (5)	−0.0243 (6)
C2	0.0556 (10)	0.0799 (11)	0.0365 (8)	−0.0071 (8)	−0.0048 (7)	−0.0074 (8)
C3	0.0521 (9)	0.0634 (9)	0.0358 (7)	−0.0107 (7)	−0.0039 (7)	−0.0101 (7)
C4	0.0378 (7)	0.0510 (8)	0.0335 (7)	0.0029 (6)	−0.0065 (6)	−0.0118 (6)
C5	0.0586 (9)	0.0446 (7)	0.0461 (8)	0.0105 (6)	−0.0207 (7)	−0.0154 (6)
C6	0.0581 (10)	0.0444 (8)	0.0694 (10)	0.0120 (7)	−0.0236 (8)	−0.0224 (7)
C7	0.0564 (10)	0.0631 (10)	0.0734 (11)	0.0133 (8)	−0.0241 (9)	−0.0415 (9)
C8	0.0469 (9)	0.0817 (11)	0.0496 (9)	0.0154 (8)	−0.0155 (7)	−0.0367 (8)
C9	0.0380 (8)	0.0641 (9)	0.0394 (7)	0.0111 (6)	−0.0098 (6)	−0.0204 (7)
C10	0.0409 (8)	0.0496 (8)	0.0377 (7)	0.0100 (6)	−0.0129 (6)	−0.0162 (6)
C11	0.0453 (8)	0.0393 (6)	0.0306 (6)	−0.0017 (5)	−0.0050 (6)	−0.0079 (5)
C12	0.0421 (8)	0.0590 (8)	0.0336 (7)	0.0011 (6)	−0.0030 (6)	−0.0146 (6)
C13	0.0521 (9)	0.0452 (7)	0.0338 (7)	0.0034 (6)	−0.0103 (6)	−0.0105 (6)
C14	0.0546 (10)	0.0674 (10)	0.0456 (8)	0.0091 (7)	−0.0174 (7)	−0.0195 (7)
C15	0.0792 (12)	0.0534 (9)	0.0477 (9)	0.0131 (8)	−0.0316 (9)	−0.0139 (7)
C16	0.1023 (15)	0.0711 (11)	0.0322 (8)	−0.0038 (10)	−0.0178 (9)	−0.0092 (7)
C17	0.0863 (13)	0.0816 (12)	0.0322 (8)	−0.0220 (10)	0.0009 (8)	−0.0106 (8)
C18	0.0623 (10)	0.0451 (7)	0.0328 (7)	−0.0093 (7)	−0.0048 (7)	−0.0074 (6)
C19	0.0517 (9)	0.0426 (7)	0.0367 (7)	−0.0106 (6)	−0.0025 (6)	−0.0101 (6)
C20	0.0974 (15)	0.1004 (15)	0.0710 (12)	0.0216 (12)	−0.0535 (12)	−0.0306 (11)
C21	0.1041 (16)	0.0426 (8)	0.0973 (15)	0.0001 (9)	−0.0352 (12)	−0.0189 (9)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

O1—C2	1.370 (2)	C11—C12	1.345 (2)
O1—C9	1.3805 (19)	C11—C19	1.458 (2)
O2—C2	1.204 (2)	C12—C13	1.4358 (18)
O3—C19	1.3728 (17)	C12—H12	0.93
O3—C18	1.3793 (18)	C13—C18	1.383 (2)
O4—C19	1.2055 (18)	C13—C14	1.394 (2)
C2—C3	1.452 (2)	C14—C15	1.384 (2)
C3—C4	1.344 (2)	C14—H14	0.93
C3—H3	0.93	C15—C16	1.392 (3)
C4—C10	1.4538 (18)	C15—C20	1.509 (2)
C4—C11	1.4911 (17)	C16—C17	1.368 (3)
C5—C6	1.383 (2)	C16—H16	0.93
C5—C10	1.395 (2)	C17—C18	1.387 (2)
C5—H5	0.93	C17—H17	0.93
C6—C7	1.394 (2)	C20—H20A	0.96
C6—C21	1.506 (2)	C20—H20B	0.96
C7—C8	1.374 (2)	C20—H20C	0.96
C7—H7	0.93	C21—H21A	0.96
C8—C9	1.381 (2)	C21—H21B	0.96
C8—H8	0.93	C21—H21C	0.96
C9—C10	1.3997 (18)

C2—O1—C9	121.88 (12)	C13—C12—H12	119
C19—O3—C18	122.41 (11)	C18—C13—C14	118.92 (13)
O2—C2—O1	117.52 (15)	C18—C13—C12	117.22 (13)
O2—C2—C3	125.51 (17)	C14—C13—C12	123.86 (14)
O1—C2—C3	116.95 (14)	C15—C14—C13	121.18 (16)
C4—C3—C2	122.65 (14)	C15—C14—H14	119.4
C4—C3—H3	118.7	C13—C14—H14	119.4
C2—C3—H3	118.7	C14—C15—C16	117.86 (15)
C3—C4—C10	119.22 (12)	C14—C15—C20	120.80 (17)
C3—C4—C11	118.88 (12)	C16—C15—C20	121.34 (16)
C10—C4—C11	121.90 (12)	C17—C16—C15	122.34 (15)
C6—C5—C10	122.28 (14)	C17—C16—H16	118.8
C6—C5—H5	118.9	C15—C16—H16	118.8
C10—C5—H5	118.9	C16—C17—C18	118.71 (16)
C5—C6—C7	117.80 (15)	C16—C17—H17	120.6
C5—C6—C21	120.70 (15)	C18—C17—H17	120.6
C7—C6—C21	121.46 (15)	O3—C18—C13	121.18 (12)
C8—C7—C6	121.81 (14)	O3—C18—C17	117.84 (14)
C8—C7—H7	119.1	C13—C18—C17	120.98 (15)
C6—C7—H7	119.1	O4—C19—O3	117.19 (13)
C7—C8—C9	119.16 (14)	O4—C19—C11	125.75 (13)
C7—C8—H8	120.4	O3—C19—C11	117.05 (13)
C9—C8—H8	120.4	C15—C20—H20A	109.5
C8—C9—O1	117.05 (13)	C15—C20—H20B	109.5
C8—C9—C10	121.36 (15)	H20A—C20—H20B	109.5
O1—C9—C10	121.58 (13)	C15—C20—H20C	109.5
C5—C10—C9	117.54 (13)	H20A—C20—H20C	109.5
C5—C10—C4	124.84 (12)	H20B—C20—H20C	109.5
C9—C10—C4	117.62 (13)	C6—C21—H21A	109.5
C12—C11—C19	119.82 (12)	C6—C21—H21B	109.5
C12—C11—C4	121.73 (12)	H21A—C21—H21B	109.5
C19—C11—C4	118.09 (12)	C6—C21—H21C	109.5
C11—C12—C13	121.94 (13)	H21A—C21—H21C	109.5
C11—C12—H12	119	H21B—C21—H21C	109.5

C9—O1—C2—O2	179.27 (14)	C3—C4—C11—C19	120.68 (15)
C9—O1—C2—C3	−2.2 (2)	C10—C4—C11—C19	−59.32 (17)
O2—C2—C3—C4	179.75 (17)	C19—C11—C12—C13	4.7 (2)
O1—C2—C3—C4	1.3 (2)	C4—C11—C12—C13	177.64 (12)
C2—C3—C4—C10	1.3 (2)	C11—C12—C13—C18	0.1 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C11	−178.68 (14)	C11—C12—C13—C14	179.81 (13)
C10—C5—C6—C7	−0.4 (2)	C18—C13—C14—C15	−0.1 (2)
C10—C5—C6—C21	−178.33 (15)	C12—C13—C14—C15	−179.77 (14)
C5—C6—C7—C8	1.2 (2)	C13—C14—C15—C16	0.9 (2)
C21—C6—C7—C8	179.09 (15)	C13—C14—C15—C20	−178.91 (15)
C6—C7—C8—C9	0.1 (2)	C14—C15—C16—C17	−0.7 (3)
C7—C8—C9—O1	178.84 (13)	C20—C15—C16—C17	179.08 (17)
C7—C8—C9—C10	−2.2 (2)	C15—C16—C17—C18	−0.3 (3)
C2—O1—C9—C8	179.28 (14)	C19—O3—C18—C13	−0.9 (2)
C2—O1—C9—C10	0.3 (2)	C19—O3—C18—C17	178.21 (14)
C6—C5—C10—C9	−1.6 (2)	C14—C13—C18—O3	178.15 (13)
C6—C5—C10—C4	177.80 (13)	C12—C13—C18—O3	−2.1 (2)
C8—C9—C10—C5	2.9 (2)	C14—C13—C18—C17	−1.0 (2)
O1—C9—C10—C5	−178.19 (12)	C12—C13—C18—C17	178.77 (14)
C8—C9—C10—C4	−176.54 (13)	C16—C17—C18—O3	−178.01 (15)
O1—C9—C10—C4	2.4 (2)	C16—C17—C18—C13	1.1 (3)
C3—C4—C10—C5	177.47 (13)	C18—O3—C19—O4	−173.26 (13)
C11—C4—C10—C5	−2.5 (2)	C18—O3—C19—C11	5.6 (2)
C3—C4—C10—C9	−3.1 (2)	C12—C11—C19—O4	171.31 (14)
C11—C4—C10—C9	176.86 (12)	C4—C11—C19—O4	−1.9 (2)
C3—C4—C11—C12	−52.37 (19)	C12—C11—C19—O3	−7.45 (19)
C10—C4—C11—C12	127.63 (15)	C4—C11—C19—O3	179.36 (11)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
C8—H8···O4ⁱ	0.93	2.53	3.330 (2)	145

Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y, −z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
C8—H8···O4ⁱ	0.93	2.53	3.330 (2)	145

Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y, −z.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	C₂₀H₁₄O₄
M_r	318.31
Crystal system, space group	Triclinic, P1
Temperature (K)	296
a, b, c (Å)	7.834 (1), 8.0455 (9), 12.7952 (15)
α, β, γ (°)	79.492 (5), 77.096 (4), 86.637 (5)
V (Å³)	772.78 (16)
Z	2
Radiation type	Mo Kα
µ (mm⁻¹)	0.10
Crystal size (mm)	0.35 × 0.31 × 0.25

Data collection
Diffractometer	Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer
Absorption correction	Multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996)
T_min, T_max	0.954, 0.964
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	12862, 3499, 2509
R_int	0.027
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.648

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.046, 0.140, 1.05
No. of reflections	3499
No. of parameters	219
H-atom treatment	H-atom parameters constrained
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.19, −0.20

Computer programs: SMART (Bruker, 1998), SAINT (Bruker, 1998), SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012) and CAMERON (Watkin et al., 1996), PARST (Nardelli, 1996) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Acknowledgements

KP gratefully acknowledges a Fellowship from the SC–ST cell, Karnatak University, Dharwad.

References

Altomare, A., Cascarano, G., Giacovazzo, C. & Guagliardi, A. (1993). J. Appl. Cryst. 26, 343–350. CrossRef Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Ayaz, M., Riaz, M. A. M., Haq, A. U., Malik, A. & Choudhary, M. I. (2006). J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 49, 527–529. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Bruker (1998). SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Dubovik, I. P., Garazd, M. M. & Khilya, V. P. (2004). Chem. Nat. Compd, 40, 434–443. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Frasinyuk, M. S., Bondarenko, S. P. & Khilya, V. P. (2012). Chem. Heterocycl. Compd, 48, 422–426. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Fun, H.-K., Jebas, S. R., Parveen, M., Khanam, Z. & Ghalib, R. M. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o1322–o1323. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Groom, C. R. & Allen, F. H. (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 53, 662–671. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hussain, H., Hussain, J., Al-Harrasi, A. & Krohn, K. (2012). Tetrahedron, 68, 2553–2578. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Ilyas, M. & Parveen, M. (1996). Tetrahedron, 52, 3991–3996. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Nardelli, M. (1996). J. Appl. Cryst. 29, 296–300. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Panichayupakaranant, P., Noguchi, H. & De-Eknamkul, W. (1998). Planta Med. 64, 774–775. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Pereira Silva, P. S., Parveen, M., Ali, A., Malla, A. M. & Ramos Silva, M. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o201. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Tepaske, M. R. & Gloer, J. B. (1992). J. Nat. Prod. 55, 1080–1086. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Ulubelen, A., Terem, B. & Tuzlaci, E. (1986). J. Nat. Prod. 49, 692–694. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Watkin, D. J., Prout, C. K. & Pearce, L. J. (1996). CAMERON. Chemical Crystallography Laboratory, University of Oxford, England. Google Scholar
Zhan, Q. F., Xia, Z. H., Wang, J. I. & Lao, A. N. (2003). J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 5, 303–306. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Zhou, H. Y., Hong, J. L., Shu, P., Ni, Y. J. & Qin, M. J. (2009). Fitoterapia, 80, 283–285. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 70| Part 11| November 2014| Pages 319-321

doi:10.1107/S1600536814021825

Open

access