organic compounds\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 70| Part 11| November 2014| Pages o1163-o1164

Crystal structure of 1,3-di­allyl-1,3,3a,4,7,7a-hexa­hydro-4,7-methano-2-benzo­thio­phene 2,2-dioxide

aDepartment of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology–Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India
*Correspondence e-mail: srk@chem.iitb.ac.in

Edited by S. V. Lindeman, Marquette University, USA (Received 29 August 2014; accepted 7 October 2014; online 15 October 2014)

The title compound C15H20O2S, was identified as a product of di­allyl­ation of the meso-isomer of the corresponding norbornene sulfone, and it is an achiral compound. The five-membered heterocycle adopts an envelope conformation with the S atom deviating by 0.795 (3) Å from the other atoms of the ring (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0131). Both allyl groups are anti-oriented relative to the S atom but their double bonds are directed in opposite directions relative to the plane of the heterocycle.

1. Related literature

For related functionalized sulfones, see: Bloch & Abecassis (1982[Bloch, R. & Abecassis, J. (1982). Tetrahedron Lett. 23, 3277-3280.], 1983[Bloch, R. & Abecassis, J. (1983). Tetrahedron Lett. 24, 1247-1250.]); Bloch et al. (1983[Bloch, R., Hassan, D. & Mandard, X. (1983). Tetrahedron Lett. 24, 4691-4694.], 1984[Bloch, R., Abecassis, J. & Hassan, D. (1984). Can. J. Chem. 62, 2019-2024.]); Yamada et al. (1983[Yamada, S., Ohsawa, H., Suzuki, T. & Takayama, H. (1983). Chem. Lett. 12, 1003-1006.]). For the synthesis of the precursor, see: Bloch & Abecassis (1982[Bloch, R. & Abecassis, J. (1982). Tetrahedron Lett. 23, 3277-3280.]). For sulfones as latent diene equivalents, see: Fringuelli & Taticchi (1990[Fringuelli, F. & Taticchi, A. (1990). In Dienes in the Diels-Alder Reaction. New York: John Wiley & Sons.]). For X-ray crystal data of related bi­cyclo­[2.2.1]compounds, see: Birney et al. (2002[Birney, D., Lim, T. K., Koh, J. H. P., Pool, B. R. & White, J. M. (2002). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 5091-5099.]). For literature on sulfones, see: Bhat (1994[Bhat, S. V. (1994). J. Indian Inst. Sci. 74, 257-276.]); Fielder et al. (2000[Fielder, S., Rowan, D. D. & Sherburn, M. S. (2000). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39, 4331-4333.]); Nakayama et al. (1997[Nakayama, J., Nagasawa, H., Sugihara, Y. & Ishii, A. (1997). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 9077-9078.]). For bond lengths in related structures, see: Chandrasekhar (1992[Chandrasekhar, J. (1992). Curr. Sci. 63, 114-116.]); Pool & White (2000[Pool, B. R. & White, J. M. (2000). Org. Lett. 2, 3505-3507.]).

[Scheme 1]

2. Experimental

2.1. Crystal data

  • C15H20O2S

  • Mr = 264.37

  • Monoclinic, P 21 /n

  • a = 12.4412 (17) Å

  • b = 8.8472 (13) Å

  • c = 12.738 (2) Å

  • β = 97.069 (8)°

  • V = 1391.4 (4) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.23 mm−1

  • T = 100 K

  • 0.27 × 0.22 × 0.11 mm

2.2. Data collection

  • Rigaku Saturn724 diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: numerical (NUMABS; Rigaku, 1999[Rigaku (1999). NUMABS. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.]) Tmin = 0.957, Tmax = 0.976

  • 20804 measured reflections

  • 3702 independent reflections

  • 3231 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • Rint = 0.097

2.3. Refinement

  • R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.069

  • wR(F2) = 0.141

  • S = 1.13

  • 3702 reflections

  • 163 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.46 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.46 e Å−3

Data collection: CrystalClear-SM Expert (Rigaku, 2013[Rigaku (2013). CrystalClear-SM Expert. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.]); cell refinement: CrystalClear-SM Expert; data reduction: CrystalClear-SM Expert; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]); molecular graphics: CrystalStructure (Rigaku, 2010[Rigaku (2010). CrystalStructure. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.]); software used to prepare material for publication: CrystalStructure.

Supporting information


Comments top

Alkyl­ated sulfone derivatives have found useful application in the synthesis of (E)-9,11-dodecadien-l-y1 acetate, a sex pheromone of the red-bollworm moth (Bloch & Abecassis, 1982). Moreover, sulfones (Bhat, 1994; Fielder et al., 2000; Nakayama et al., 1997) are latent diene (Fringuelli & Taticchi, 1990) equivalents. In view of the applications of various alkyl and other functionalized sulfone derivatives (Bloch & Abecassis, 1983; Bloch et al., 1983; Yamada et al., 1983), we have synthesized the title compound, C15H20O2S (Figure 1), which is a non-chiral meso compound (i.e. inter­nal recemate). The corresponding mono-allyl­ated sulfone has been reported previously (Bloch et al., 1984). The starting sulfone was allyl­ated with allyl bromide using n-BuLi as a base at –75 °C to room temperature for 25 h to furnish the desired di-allyl­ated sulfone 1 in 80% yield along with the mono-allyl­ated sulfone in 10% yield. After recrystallization from a mixture of hexane-di­chloro­methane (3:1), we obtained monoclinic crystals of the compound 1. The single-crystal X-ray study of the compound 1 clearly indicates that the di-allyl­ation has been occurred at α,α'-positions of the sulfone functionality with the allyl groups cis-positioned relatively to each other (see Figure 1). This stereoselectivity can be explained by stronger sterical hindrances at the endo face of the sulfone ring for the approaching electrophile (allyl bromide) as compared with those at its exo face. The title compound exhibits single bonds Csp3—Csp3 elongated up to 1.576 (3) Å [C4—C5]. The bond lengths C3—C4 of 1.559 (3) Å and C5—C6 of 1.568 (3) Å are also longer than that of the standard average Csp3— Csp3 single bond [1.54 Å] (Chandrasekhar, 1992). The bond angle C3—C7—C6 of 94.14 (17) Å is contracted the most relative to the standard tetra­hedral value of 109.5°. The angle C13—C14—C15 is found to be the most expanded one at 125.1 (2)°. The five-membered heterocycle has an envelope conformation, in which four C atoms are in the same plane (C8—C5—C4—C12) and SO2 group deviates from it. Two allylic double bonds are oriented in opposite direction to each other. Previously, Pool and White (2000) have also reported that the average lengths of C—C bonds corresponding to C3—C4 and C5—C6 in our structure in the similar bicyclic cyclo­hexene derivatives are also significantly longer (by 0.02 Å) than the corresponding C—C bond distances for the saturated bicyclic cyclo­hexane derivatives. Later, Birney and co-workers (Birney et al., 2002) have studied the X-ray crystal data of bi­cyclo­[2.2.1]moiety containing compounds in order to estimate their retro-Diels–Alder reactivity.

Experimental Section top

Melting points were recorded on Veego melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on a Bruker (Avance IIITM 500) spectrometer operated at 500 MHz for 1H and 125.7 MHz for 13C nuclei. The high-resolution mass spectrometric (HRMS) measurements were carried out using Bruker (Maxis Impact) instrument. Infrared (IR) spectrum of solid sample was recorded as KBr pellets on Nicolet Impact-400 FT IR spectrometer.

Synthesis and Crystallization of Compound_1 top

The solution of the precursor sulfone (600 mg, 3.26 mmol) in anhydrous THF (15 mL) was cooled to –75 °C under nitro­gen (N2). To this solution, n-BuLi (4.90 mL, 2.4 equiv, 1.6 M solution in hexanes) was added in dropwise manner and the reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min. Later, allyl bromide (0.83 mL, 9.77 mmol) was added slowly and the stirring continued at the same temperature for 2 h. Then, the reaction mixture was allowed to raise to the room temperature and the stirring continued for 22 h more. At the conclusion of the reaction (TLC monitoring), the reaction mixture was quenched with water (5 mL) and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. Then, the resulting residue was extracted with di­ethyl ether (3 × 30 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (2 × 20 mL) and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography using ethyl acetate-petroleum ether (1:9) as an eluent to afford the di-allyl­ated sulfone 1 (690 mg, 80%) as a white crystalline solid. A further elution with ethyl acetate-petroleum ether (2:8) delivered the previously known mono-allyl­ated sulfone (75.40 mg, 10%) as a pale yellow liquid. 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data of the mono-allyl­ated sulfone was compared with the literature report (Bloch et al., 1984) and found to be identical. After purification the title compound was recrystallized from a mixture of hexane-di­chloro­methane (3:1) by slow evaporation to get the colourless crystals. Rf = 0.91 (20% ethyl acetate in petroleum ether); mp: 348.15–349.15 K. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 6.20 (br s, 2H), 5.88–5.80 (m, 2H), 5.23 (dd, J = 16.9, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 5.16 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 2H), 2.99 (br s, 2H), 2.77–2.72 (m, 2H), 2.45–2.40 (m, 2H), 2.37–2.30 (m, 4H), 1.67 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 1.39 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) = 136.9, 133.6, 118.6, 62.5, 49.8, 45.6, 45.3, 30.8; HRMS (ESI, Q-ToF) m/z: calculated for C15H20NaO2S [M+Na]+ 287.1076, found: 287.1077; IR (neat): υmax = 3021, 2978, 1640, 1443, 1306, 1216, 1123 cm-1.

Refinement top

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 1. All H atoms were placed in their geometrically calculated positions and refined using a riding model with C—H distances of 0.95 Å for all H atoms bound to sp2 C atoms and 1.00 Å for all others. Uiso(H) = xUeq(C), where x = 1.5 for allylic methyl­idene [C(11,15)H2] H atoms and 1.2 for all other H atoms. The positions of allylic methyl­idene and non-allylic methine [C(1,2)H—] H atoms were calculated using the SHELXL-97 instructions AFIX 93 and AFIX 43 respectively (Sheldrick, 2008).

Related literature top

For related functionalized sulfones, see: Bloch & Abecassis (1982, 1983); Bloch et al. (1983, 1984); Yamada et al. (1983). For the synthesis of the precursor, see: Bloch & Abecassis (1982). For sulfones as latent diene equivalents, see: Fringuelli & Taticchi (1990). For X-ray crystal data of related bicyclo[2.2.1]compounds, see: Birney et al. (2002). For literature on sulfones, see: Bhat (1994); Fielder et al. (2000); Nakayama et al. (1997). For bond lengths in related structures, see: Chandrasekhar (1992); Pool & White (2000).

Computing details top

Data collection: CrystalClear-SM Expert (Rigaku, 2013); cell refinement: CrystalClear-SM Expert (Rigaku, 2013); data reduction: CrystalClear-SM Expert (Rigaku, 2013); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: CrystalStructure (Rigaku, 2010); software used to prepare material for publication: CrystalStructure (Rigaku, 2010).

Figures top
The stucture of the title compound showing labeling of non-H atoms.
1,3-Diallyl-1,3,3a,4,7,7a-hexahydro-4,7-methano-2-benzothiophene 2,2-dioxide top
Crystal data top
C15H20O2SF(000) = 568
Mr = 264.37Dx = 1.262 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMelting point = 349.15–348.15 K
Hall symbol: -P 2ynMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71075 Å
a = 12.4412 (17) ÅCell parameters from 3728 reflections
b = 8.8472 (13) Åθ = 3.2–29.1°
c = 12.738 (2) ŵ = 0.23 mm1
β = 97.069 (8)°T = 100 K
V = 1391.4 (4) Å3Prism, colourless
Z = 40.27 × 0.22 × 0.11 mm
Data collection top
Rigaku Saturn724
diffractometer
3702 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube3231 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.097
Detector resolution: 7.111 pixels mm-1θmax = 29.2°, θmin = 3.2°
ω scansh = 1616
Absorption correction: numerical
(NUMABS; Rigaku, 1999)
k = 1212
Tmin = 0.957, Tmax = 0.976l = 1717
20804 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.069Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.141H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.13 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0388P)2 + 1.1426P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3702 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
163 parametersΔρmax = 0.46 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.45 e Å3
Crystal data top
C15H20O2SV = 1391.4 (4) Å3
Mr = 264.37Z = 4
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation
a = 12.4412 (17) ŵ = 0.23 mm1
b = 8.8472 (13) ÅT = 100 K
c = 12.738 (2) Å0.27 × 0.22 × 0.11 mm
β = 97.069 (8)°
Data collection top
Rigaku Saturn724
diffractometer
3702 independent reflections
Absorption correction: numerical
(NUMABS; Rigaku, 1999)
3231 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.957, Tmax = 0.976Rint = 0.097
20804 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0690 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.141H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.13Δρmax = 0.46 e Å3
3702 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.45 e Å3
163 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. All non-hydrogen atoms are refined anisotropically and all hydrogen atoms are refined using riding model.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.13583 (4)0.04117 (7)0.17128 (4)0.01977 (15)
O10.17802 (13)0.0793 (2)0.26827 (12)0.0266 (4)
O20.02888 (12)0.09616 (19)0.15801 (13)0.0248 (4)
C10.37378 (18)0.1394 (3)0.04960 (18)0.0255 (5)
H1A0.44350.09710.04640.031*
C20.33509 (17)0.2638 (3)0.00116 (18)0.0233 (5)
H2A0.37150.32580.04410.028*
C30.22217 (18)0.2896 (3)0.03084 (18)0.0227 (5)
H3A0.19480.39580.02360.027*
C40.14638 (17)0.1664 (3)0.02595 (17)0.0199 (4)
H4A0.07130.18180.00760.024*
C50.19392 (17)0.0161 (3)0.02751 (17)0.0203 (5)
H5A0.13740.03380.06500.024*
C60.28701 (18)0.0765 (3)0.11112 (18)0.0231 (5)
H6A0.31260.00580.17020.028*
C70.23523 (18)0.2246 (3)0.14310 (17)0.0240 (5)
H7A0.28440.28530.19360.029*
H7B0.16510.20860.17080.029*
C80.22743 (17)0.0912 (3)0.05690 (17)0.0214 (5)
H8A0.30240.06360.07060.026*
C90.22503 (19)0.2605 (3)0.03435 (19)0.0267 (5)
H9A0.24660.31700.09550.032*
H9B0.15040.29120.02450.032*
C100.3005 (2)0.2993 (3)0.0631 (2)0.0303 (6)
H10A0.27860.27390.12980.036*
C110.3942 (2)0.3655 (3)0.0626 (3)0.0397 (7)
H11A0.41870.39240.00270.060*
H11B0.43790.38670.12740.060*
C120.14238 (17)0.1576 (3)0.14620 (16)0.0191 (4)
H12A0.21210.19740.16670.023*
C130.04834 (18)0.2400 (3)0.21087 (18)0.0226 (5)
H13A0.02100.20290.18980.027*
H13B0.04890.21670.28680.027*
C140.05525 (18)0.4070 (3)0.19523 (18)0.0257 (5)
H14A0.11780.45680.21390.031*
C150.0184 (2)0.4906 (3)0.1576 (2)0.0321 (6)
H15A0.08220.44500.13800.048*
H15B0.00800.59660.15000.048*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0159 (3)0.0258 (3)0.0175 (3)0.0011 (2)0.00159 (19)0.0028 (2)
O10.0258 (8)0.0346 (10)0.0197 (8)0.0032 (7)0.0045 (6)0.0060 (7)
O20.0173 (8)0.0308 (9)0.0258 (9)0.0009 (6)0.0013 (6)0.0032 (7)
C10.0146 (10)0.0360 (14)0.0253 (12)0.0017 (9)0.0001 (8)0.0075 (10)
C20.0194 (10)0.0302 (13)0.0205 (11)0.0071 (9)0.0027 (8)0.0036 (10)
C30.0201 (11)0.0255 (12)0.0220 (11)0.0001 (9)0.0001 (8)0.0031 (9)
C40.0145 (9)0.0264 (12)0.0188 (10)0.0009 (8)0.0023 (8)0.0010 (9)
C50.0161 (10)0.0274 (12)0.0174 (10)0.0008 (8)0.0023 (8)0.0026 (9)
C60.0204 (11)0.0290 (13)0.0192 (11)0.0006 (9)0.0010 (8)0.0003 (9)
C70.0203 (11)0.0328 (13)0.0188 (11)0.0003 (9)0.0019 (8)0.0030 (10)
C80.0158 (10)0.0274 (12)0.0206 (11)0.0003 (8)0.0007 (8)0.0008 (9)
C90.0234 (11)0.0269 (13)0.0285 (12)0.0026 (9)0.0018 (9)0.0012 (10)
C100.0342 (13)0.0273 (13)0.0283 (13)0.0012 (10)0.0002 (10)0.0022 (11)
C110.0337 (14)0.0323 (15)0.0504 (17)0.0011 (11)0.0054 (12)0.0059 (13)
C120.0162 (10)0.0240 (11)0.0173 (10)0.0001 (8)0.0025 (8)0.0006 (9)
C130.0203 (10)0.0268 (12)0.0196 (11)0.0033 (9)0.0016 (8)0.0005 (9)
C140.0214 (11)0.0314 (13)0.0238 (12)0.0032 (9)0.0006 (9)0.0044 (10)
C150.0264 (12)0.0335 (14)0.0349 (14)0.0044 (10)0.0023 (10)0.0031 (11)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
S1—O11.4406 (16)C7—H7A0.9900
S1—O21.4461 (16)C7—H7B0.9900
S1—C121.788 (2)C8—C91.527 (3)
S1—C81.791 (2)C8—H8A1.0000
C1—C21.323 (3)C9—C101.502 (3)
C1—C61.516 (3)C9—H9A0.9900
C1—H1A0.9500C9—H9B0.9900
C2—C31.516 (3)C10—C111.305 (4)
C2—H2A0.9500C10—H10A0.9500
C3—C71.531 (3)C11—H11A0.9500
C3—C41.559 (3)C11—H11B0.9500
C3—H3A1.0000C12—C131.530 (3)
C4—C121.528 (3)C12—H12A1.0000
C4—C51.576 (3)C13—C141.492 (3)
C4—H4A1.0000C13—H13A0.9900
C5—C81.530 (3)C13—H13B0.9900
C5—C61.568 (3)C14—C151.313 (3)
C5—H5A1.0000C14—H14A0.9500
C6—C71.537 (3)C15—H15A0.9500
C6—H6A1.0000C15—H15B0.9500
O1—S1—O2117.32 (10)C3—C7—H7B112.9
O1—S1—C12111.75 (10)C6—C7—H7B112.9
O2—S1—C12109.42 (10)H7A—C7—H7B110.3
O1—S1—C8112.16 (10)C9—C8—C5117.59 (19)
O2—S1—C8108.92 (10)C9—C8—S1111.73 (16)
C12—S1—C895.00 (10)C5—C8—S1102.55 (15)
C2—C1—C6107.8 (2)C9—C8—H8A108.2
C2—C1—H1A126.1C5—C8—H8A108.2
C6—C1—H1A126.1S1—C8—H8A108.2
C1—C2—C3107.7 (2)C10—C9—C8110.8 (2)
C1—C2—H2A126.2C10—C9—H9A109.5
C3—C2—H2A126.2C8—C9—H9A109.5
C2—C3—C7100.44 (18)C10—C9—H9B109.5
C2—C3—C4107.77 (18)C8—C9—H9B109.5
C7—C3—C499.18 (18)H9A—C9—H9B108.1
C2—C3—H3A115.7C11—C10—C9124.5 (3)
C7—C3—H3A115.7C11—C10—H10A117.8
C4—C3—H3A115.7C9—C10—H10A117.8
C12—C4—C3116.35 (18)C10—C11—H11A120.0
C12—C4—C5110.74 (18)C10—C11—H11B120.0
C3—C4—C5102.46 (17)H11A—C11—H11B120.0
C12—C4—H4A109.0C4—C12—C13116.34 (18)
C3—C4—H4A109.0C4—C12—S1102.97 (15)
C5—C4—H4A109.0C13—C12—S1110.95 (15)
C8—C5—C6116.52 (18)C4—C12—H12A108.8
C8—C5—C4109.88 (17)C13—C12—H12A108.8
C6—C5—C4102.26 (18)S1—C12—H12A108.8
C8—C5—H5A109.3C14—C13—C12111.85 (19)
C6—C5—H5A109.3C14—C13—H13A109.2
C4—C5—H5A109.3C12—C13—H13A109.2
C1—C6—C799.92 (19)C14—C13—H13B109.2
C1—C6—C5106.71 (18)C12—C13—H13B109.2
C7—C6—C599.91 (17)H13A—C13—H13B107.9
C1—C6—H6A116.0C15—C14—C13125.1 (2)
C7—C6—H6A116.0C15—C14—H14A117.5
C5—C6—H6A116.0C13—C14—H14A117.5
C3—C7—C694.14 (17)C14—C15—H15A120.0
C3—C7—H7A112.9C14—C15—H15B120.0
C6—C7—H7A112.9H15A—C15—H15B120.0
C6—C1—C2—C31.2 (3)C4—C5—C8—S129.21 (19)
C1—C2—C3—C732.1 (2)O1—S1—C8—C977.19 (18)
C1—C2—C3—C471.2 (2)O2—S1—C8—C954.37 (19)
C2—C3—C4—C1256.1 (2)C12—S1—C8—C9166.88 (16)
C7—C3—C4—C12160.25 (18)O1—S1—C8—C5155.97 (14)
C2—C3—C4—C564.9 (2)O2—S1—C8—C572.46 (16)
C7—C3—C4—C539.31 (19)C12—S1—C8—C540.04 (15)
C12—C4—C5—C82.9 (2)C5—C8—C9—C1060.6 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C8121.84 (18)S1—C8—C9—C10178.75 (17)
C12—C4—C5—C6127.26 (18)C8—C9—C10—C11105.1 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C62.5 (2)C3—C4—C12—C1397.1 (2)
C2—C1—C6—C733.9 (2)C5—C4—C12—C13146.51 (19)
C2—C1—C6—C569.7 (2)C3—C4—C12—S1141.38 (16)
C8—C5—C6—C151.2 (3)C5—C4—C12—S124.95 (19)
C4—C5—C6—C168.6 (2)O1—S1—C12—C4154.63 (13)
C8—C5—C6—C7154.80 (19)O2—S1—C12—C473.72 (15)
C4—C5—C6—C735.0 (2)C8—S1—C12—C438.37 (15)
C2—C3—C7—C649.4 (2)O1—S1—C12—C1380.22 (17)
C4—C3—C7—C660.77 (18)O2—S1—C12—C1351.43 (18)
C1—C6—C7—C349.91 (19)C8—S1—C12—C13163.51 (16)
C5—C6—C7—C359.17 (19)C4—C12—C13—C1465.6 (3)
C6—C5—C8—C992.2 (2)S1—C12—C13—C14177.17 (16)
C4—C5—C8—C9152.19 (19)C12—C13—C14—C15120.0 (3)
C6—C5—C8—S1144.85 (17)

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC15H20O2S
Mr264.37
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c (Å)12.4412 (17), 8.8472 (13), 12.738 (2)
β (°) 97.069 (8)
V3)1391.4 (4)
Z4
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.23
Crystal size (mm)0.27 × 0.22 × 0.11
Data collection
DiffractometerRigaku Saturn724
diffractometer
Absorption correctionNumerical
(NUMABS; Rigaku, 1999)
Tmin, Tmax0.957, 0.976
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
20804, 3702, 3231
Rint0.097
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.685
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.069, 0.141, 1.13
No. of reflections3702
No. of parameters163
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.46, 0.45

Computer programs: CrystalClear-SM Expert (Rigaku, 2013), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), CrystalStructure (Rigaku, 2010).

 

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the DST for the financial support. We also thank SAIF–Mumbai for recording the spectroscopic data. SK thanks the DST for the award of a J. C. Bose fellowship. RG thanks IIT–Bombay and UGC–New Delhi for the award of a research fellowship. We thank Mr Darshan Mhatre for his help in collecting the X-ray data, Professor Maheswaran Shanmugam and Professor C. P. Rao for their helpful suggestions. RG also thanks Mr Saravanan Raju for his help during the structure refinement.

References

First citationBhat, S. V. (1994). J. Indian Inst. Sci. 74, 257–276.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationBirney, D., Lim, T. K., Koh, J. H. P., Pool, B. R. & White, J. M. (2002). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 5091–5099.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationBloch, R. & Abecassis, J. (1983). Tetrahedron Lett. 24, 1247–1250.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBloch, R., Abecassis, J. & Hassan, D. (1984). Can. J. Chem. 62, 2019–2024.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBloch, R., Hassan, D. & Mandard, X. (1983). Tetrahedron Lett. 24, 4691–4694.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBloch, R. & Abecassis, J. (1982). Tetrahedron Lett. 23, 3277–3280.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationChandrasekhar, J. (1992). Curr. Sci. 63, 114–116.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationFielder, S., Rowan, D. D. & Sherburn, M. S. (2000). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39, 4331–4333.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationFringuelli, F. & Taticchi, A. (1990). In Dienes in the Diels–Alder Reaction. New York: John Wiley & Sons.  Google Scholar
First citationNakayama, J., Nagasawa, H., Sugihara, Y. & Ishii, A. (1997). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 9077–9078.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationPool, B. R. & White, J. M. (2000). Org. Lett. 2, 3505–3507.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationRigaku (1999). NUMABS. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.  Google Scholar
First citationRigaku (2010). CrystalStructure. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.  Google Scholar
First citationRigaku (2013). CrystalClear-SM Expert. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.  Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationYamada, S., Ohsawa, H., Suzuki, T. & Takayama, H. (1983). Chem. Lett. 12, 1003–1006.  CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 70| Part 11| November 2014| Pages o1163-o1164
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds