research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 71| Part 3| March 2015| Pages 309-311

Crystal structure of {(but-3-en-1-yl)bis­­[(pyridin-2-yl)meth­yl]amine-κ3N,N′,N′′}di­chlorido­copper(II) di­ethyl ether hemisolvate

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aDepartment of Chemistry & Physics, Saint Mary's College, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA, bDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, USA, and cDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: koshin@saintmarys.edu

Edited by S. Parkin, University of Kentucky, USA (Received 9 February 2015; accepted 18 February 2015; online 25 February 2015)

The five-coordinate CuII atom in the title complex [CuCl2(C16H19N3)]·0.5C4H10O, adopts a near-ideal square-pyramidal geometry (τ-5 = 0.01). The apical Cu—Cl distance is 0.2626 (6) Å longer than the basal Cu—Cl distance. Weak C—H⋯Cl interactions between pyridine rings and the Cl atoms of adjacent complex molecules are present. The solvent molecule, located on a twofold rotation axis, is situated in the voids of this arrangement. Copper atoms coordinated by tridentate nitro­gen-containing ligands have been found to be excellent promoters of Atom Transfer Radical Addition (ATRA) reactions.

1. Chemical context

Transition-metal-catalyzed Atom Transfer Radical Addition (ATRA) reactions of haloalkanes and α-halo­carbonyls to α-olefins have emerged as some of the most atom economical methods for simultaneously forming C—C and C—X bonds, leading to the production of more attractive mol­ecules with well-defined compositions, architectures, and functionalities (Pintauer & Matyjaszewski, 2005[Pintauer, T. & Matyjaszewski, K. (2005). Coord. Chem. Rev. 249, 1155-1184.]). Copper(I) complexes with tridentate and tetra­dentate nitro­gen-based ligands are currently some of the most active multidentate ligand structures developed for use in ATRA reactions (Matyjaszewski et al., 2001[Matyjaszewski, K., Gobelt, B., Paik, H. & Horwitz, C. (2001). Macromolecules, 34, 430-440.]). In view of the importance of these types of complexes, we report the synthesis and structural characterization of the title compound {(but-3-en-1-yl)bis­[(pyridin-2-yl)meth­yl]amine-κ3N,N′,N′′} di­chlorido­copper(II) diethyl ether hemisolvate, (I)[link].

[Scheme 1]

2. Structural commentary

The title complex, (I)[link] (Fig. 1[link]), adopts a typical-for-this-class of compounds (vide infra), slightly distorted square-pyramidal geometry, as shown in the bond angles about the CuII atom. A τ-5 analysis of the distortions about the CuII atom yields a value of 0.01, close to an ideal value of zero for a perfect square-pyramidal geometry [Addison et al., 1984[Addison, A. W., Rao, T. N., Reedijk, J., van Rijn, J. & Verschoor, G. C. (1984). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 1349-1356.]; τ-5 = (βα)/60 where β and α are the angles formed by atoms trans across the metal atom that do not include the apical atom]. In the complex, the CuII atom lies 0.2761 (5) Å out of the mean basal plane formed by the three coordinating N atoms and atom Cl1, reflecting the slight distortion from a true square plane. The Cu—N bond lengths are all similar [1.9980 (11)–2.0700 (10) Å] and the apical Cu—Cl2 distance is considerably longer [2.5134 (4) Å] than that of Cu—Cl1 [2.2508 (4) Å] in the basal plane. The diethyl ether mol­ecule of crystallization is located in the unit cell with the O atom on the crystallographic twofold rotation axis at [[1 \over 2], y, [3 \over 4]].

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The molecular structure and atom-labeling scheme for (I)[link]. Displacement parameters are depicted at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry code: (i) −x + 1, y, −z + [{3\over 2}].]

3. Supra­molecular features

Despite an open coordination site on the CuII atom, the complex does not dimerize through a chloride bridge, that is often observed in similar complexes (vide infra). There are weak electrostatic C—H⋯Cl inter­actions between pyridine rings and the basal chlorine of adjacent mol­ecules (Table 1[link] and Fig. 2[link]). Close contacts about the butenyl chain are typical van der Waals contacts. The orientation of the butenyl chain is such that it is anti to the apical Cl ligand, effectively proximal to the vacant sixth coordination site of the CuII atom. Instead, the diethyl ether mol­ecule of crystallization is located in the pocket formed by the butenyl chain and the basal coordination plane of the CuII atom. Perhaps surprisingly, the ether O atom is not oriented towards, or spatially close to, the Cu atom [Cu⋯O1ii = 4.9130 (9) Å; symmetry code (ii) −x + [{1\over 2}], −y + [{3\over 2}], −z + 1] and merely serves to occupy a void space that would otherwise be formed by mol­ecular packing.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C3—H3⋯Cl2i 0.95 2.67 3.5541 (15) 156
C11—H11⋯Cl2ii 0.95 2.74 3.4767 (15) 135
C14—H14A⋯Cl2iii 0.99 2.80 3.7127 (18) 153
Symmetry codes: (i) [-x+{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{3\over 2}}, -z]; (ii) [x, -y+1, z+{\script{1\over 2}}]; (iii) [-x+{\script{1\over 2}}, y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}].
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Packing diagram viewed along the a direction demonstrating the linear C—H⋯Cl electrostatic inter­actions (blue dashed lines).

4. Database survey

Although there are 80 copper chloride structures that incorporate the bis­(pyridin-2-ylmeth­yl)amine ligand (Groom & Allen, 2014[Groom, C. R. & Allen, F. H. (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 662-671.]; CSD Version 5.36 plus one update), only 20 have a sole bis­(pyridin-2-ylmeth­yl)amine ligand chelating to a CuCl2 moiety within an overall five coordination. The remaining 60 structures either have a tethered pair or tethered tiplet of ligands, or have the bridging chlorines between two complexes and are thus the more common geometry adopted by copper coordinated by a bis­(pyridin-2-ylmeth­yl)amine based ligand. The geometry of the ligand and pendant group observed herein, is also a common feature of these structures, vis-a-vis, the pendant chain is oriented anti to the apical chlorine.

5. Synthesis and crystallization

For the preparation of (but-3-en-1-yl)bis­[(pyridin-2-yl)meth­yl]amine (see Scheme 1[link] below), the bis­(pyridin-2-ylmeth­yl)amine (BPMA) pre­cursor was synthesized and purified following literature procedures (Carvalho et al., 2006[Carvalho, N. F., Horn, A., Bortoluzzi, A. J., Drago, V. & Antunes, O. A. (2006). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 359, 90-98.]). BPMA (8.064 g, 40.5 mmol) was dissolved in aceto­nitrile (15 ml) followed by the addition of tri­ethyl­amine (4.098 g, 40.5 mmol) and 4-bromo­butene (5.468 g, 40.5 mmol). The reaction vessel was sealed and allowed to mix for 4 d to ensure complete deprotonation and coupling occurred. Generation of the tri­ethyl­amine hydrogen bromide salt, Et3NH+·Br, was observed as white crystals in the brown-colored solution. The mixture was filtered and the desired product extracted from the filtrate using a hexa­ne/water mixture. The hexane layer was separated and solvent removed to yield the ligand as a yellow colored oil (yield 8.516 g, 83%). The ligand was stored in a septum-sealed round-bottomed flask under argon gas in a refrigerator.

[Scheme 2]

For the synthesis of the title compound, (I)[link], 1-butene-BPMA (2.000 g, 7.900 mmol) was dissolved in aceto­nitrile (20 ml) in a 50 ml round-bottomed flask. CuCl2 (1.062 g, 7.900 mmol) was added to the flask to give a green-colored solution. The reaction was allowed to mix for 6 h, then pentane (20 ml) was added slowly to the solution to generate a bright-green precipitate. The solvent was removed from the round-bottomed flask by connecting it to a rotary evaporator. The precipitate obtained was washed twice by transferring two 15 ml aliquots of pentane into the flask and stirring vigorously for 30 min. The solvent was removed and the precipitate dried under vacuum for 2 h to yield a green solid (yield 2.909 g, 95%). Slow diffusion of diethyl ether into an aceto­nitrile solution of the complex at room temperature produced crystals of (I)[link] suitable for X-ray analysis.

6. Refinement details

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2[link]. All non-H atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. H atoms were included in idealized positions, with C—H = 0.95 (aromatic), 0.98 (meth­yl), and 0.99 Å (ethyl­inic/methyl­ene). Methyl H atoms were allowed to rotate to minimize their electron-density contribution. The Uiso(H) values were set at 1.5Ueq(C) for methyl H atoms and at 1.2Ueq(C) otherwise.

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula [CuCl2(C16H19N3)]·0.5C4H10O
Mr 424.84
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K) 150
a, b, c (Å) 22.1614 (13), 11.5738 (5), 16.4530 (7)
β (°) 108.771 (1)
V3) 3995.6 (3)
Z 8
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 1.37
Crystal size (mm) 0.50 × 0.28 × 0.10
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker APEXII
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015[Krause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3-10.])
Tmin, Tmax 0.471, 0.840
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 24823, 6872, 5660
Rint 0.025
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.758
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.028, 0.072, 1.03
No. of reflections 6872
No. of parameters 223
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.53, −0.43
Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2010[Bruker (2010). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3-8.]), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006[Brandenburg, K. (2006). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.]), POV-RAY (Cason, 2013[Cason, C. J. (2013). POV-RAY. Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd, Victoria, Australia.]) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010[Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.]).

Supporting information


Chemical context top

Transition-metal-catalyzed Atom Transfer Radical Addition (ATRA) reactions of haloalkanes and α-halo­carbonyls to α-olefins have emerged as some of the most atom economical methods for simultaneously forming C—C and C—X bonds, leading to the production of more attractive molecules with well-defined compositions, architectures, and functionalities (Pintauer & Matyjaszewski, 2005). Copper(I) complexes with tridentate and tetra­dentate nitro­gen-based ligands are currently some of the most active multidentate ligand structures developed for use in ATRA reactions (Matyjaszewski et al., 2001). In view of the importance of these types of complexes, we report the synthesis and structural characterization of the title compound {(but-3-en-1-yl)bis­[(pyridin-2-yl)methyl]­amine-κN,N',N''} dichloridocopper(II) di­ethyl ether monosolvate, (I).

Structural commentary top

The title complex, (I) (Fig. 1), adopts a typical-for-this-class of compounds (vide infra), slightly distorted square-pyramidal geometry, as shown in the bond angles about the Cu center. A τ-5 analysis of the distortions about the Cu center yields a value of 0.01, close to an ideal value of zero for a perfect square-pyramidal geometry [Addison et al., 1984; τ-5 = (β - α)/60 where β and α are the angles formed by atoms trans across the metal center that do not include the apical atom]. In the complex, the Cu center lies 0.2761 (5) Å out of the mean basal plane formed by the three coordinating N atoms and atom Cl1, reflecting the slight distortion from a true square plane. The Cu—N bond distances are all similar [1.9980 (11)–2.0700 (10) Å] and the apical Cu—Cl2 distance is considerably longer [2.5134 (4) Å] than that of Cu—Cl1 [2.2508 (4) Å] in the basal plane. The di­ethyl ether molecule of crystallization is located in the unit cell with the O atom on the crystallographic twofold axis at [1/2, y, 3/4].

Supra­molecular features top

Despite an open coordination site on the copper center, the complex does not dimerize through a chloride bridge, that is often observed in similar complexes (vide infra). There are weak electrostatic C—H···Cl inter­actions between pyridine rings and the basal chlorine of adjacent molecules (Table 1 and Fig. 2). Close contacts about the butenyl chain are typical van der Waals contacts. The orientation of the butenyl chain is such that it is anti to the apical Cl ligand, effectively proximal to the vacant sixth coordination site of the Cu center. Instead, the di­ethyl ether molecule of crystallization is located in the pocket formed by the butenyl chain and the basal coordination plane of the Cu center. Perhaps surprisingly, the ether O atom is not oriented towards, or spatially close to, the Cu atom [Cu···O1ii = 4.9130 (9) Å; symmetry code (ii) -x+1/2, -y+3/2, -z+1] and merely serves to occupy a void space that would otherwise be formed by molecular packing.

Database survey top

Although there are 80 copper chloride structures that incorporate the bis­(pyridin-2-yl­methyl)­amine ligand (Allen, 2002; CSD Version 5.36 +1 update), only 20 have a sole bis­(pyridin-2-yl­methyl)­amine ligand chelating a five-coordinate copper chloride center. The remaining sixty structures either have a tethered pair or tethered tiplet of ligands, or have the bridging chlorines between two complexes and are thus the more common geometry adopted by copper coordinated by a bis­(pyridin-2-yl­methyl)­amine based ligand. The geometry of the ligand and pendant group observed herein, is also a common feature of these structures, vis-a-vis, the pendant chain is oriented anti to the apical chlorine.

Synthesis and crystallization top

For the preparation of (but-3-en-1-yl)bis­[(pyridin-2-yl)methyl]­amine, the bis­(pyridin-2-yl­methyl)­amine (BPMA) precursor was synthesized and purified following literature procedures (Carvalho et al., 2006). BPMA (8.064 g, 40.5 mmol) was dissolved in aceto­nitrile (15 ml) followed by the addition of tri­ethyl­amine (4.098 g, 40.5 mmol) and 4-bromo­butene (5.468 g, 40.5 mmol). The reaction was sealed and allowed to mix for 4 d to ensure complete deprotonation and coupling occurred. Generation of the tri­ethyl­amine hydrogen bromide salt, [Et3NH]+.Br-, was observed as white crystals in the brown-colored solution. The mixture was filtered and desired product extracted from the filtrate using a hexane/water mixture. The hexane layer was separated and solvent removed to yield the ligand as a yellow colored oil (yield 8.516 g, 83%). The ligand was stored in a septum-sealed round-bottomed flask under argon gas in a refrigerator.

For the synthesis of the title compound, (I), 1-butene-BPMA (2.000 g, 7.900 mmol) was dissolved in aceto­nitrile (20 ml) in a 50 ml round-bottomed flask. CuCl2 (1.062 g, 7.900 mmol) was added to the flask to give a green-colored solution. The reaction was allowed to mix for 6 h, then pentane (20 ml) was added slowly to the solution to generate a bright-green precipitate. The solvent was removed from the round-bottomed flask by connecting it to a rotary evaporator. The precipitate obtained was washed twice by transferring two 15 ml aliquots of pentane into the flask and stirring vigorously for 30 min. The solvent was removed and the precipitate dried under vacuum for 2 h to yield a green solid (yield 2.909 g, 95%). Slow diffusion of di­ethyl ether into an aceto­nitrile solution of the complex at room temperature produced crystals of (I) suitable for X-ray analysis.

Refinement details top

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. All non-H atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement parameters. H atoms were included in idealized positions, with C—H = 0.95 (aromatic), 0.98 (methyl), and 0.99 Å (ethyl­inic/methyl­ene). Methyl H atoms were allowed to rotate to minimize their electron-density contribution. The Uiso(H) values were set at 1.5Ueq(C) for methyl H atoms and at 1.2Ueq(C) otherwise.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Addison et al. (1984); Allen (2002); Carvalho et al. (2006); Matyjaszewski et al. (2001); Pintauer & Matyjaszewski (2005).

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2010); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2010); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2010); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006) and POV-RAY (Cason, 2013); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The structure and atom-labeling scheme for (I). Displacement parameters are depicted at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry code: (i) -x+1, y, -z+3/2.]
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Packing diagram viewed along the a direction demonstrating the linear C—H···Cl electrostatic interactions (blue dashed lines).
{(But-3-en-1-yl)bis[(pyridin-2-yl)methyl]amine-κ3N,N',N''} dichloridocopper(II) diethyl ether hemisolvate top
Crystal data top
[CuCl2(C16H19N3)]·0.5C4H10OF(000) = 1760
Mr = 424.84Dx = 1.412 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 22.1614 (13) ÅCell parameters from 8841 reflections
b = 11.5738 (5) Åθ = 2.2–32.2°
c = 16.4530 (7) ŵ = 1.37 mm1
β = 108.771 (1)°T = 150 K
V = 3995.6 (3) Å3Rhomboid, blue
Z = 80.50 × 0.28 × 0.10 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII
diffractometer
6872 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube5660 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.025
Detector resolution: 8.33 pixels mm-1θmax = 32.6°, θmin = 1.9°
ϕ and ω scansh = 3233
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
k = 1717
Tmin = 0.471, Tmax = 0.840l = 2324
24823 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.072H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0348P)2 + 2.0749P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
6872 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.002
223 parametersΔρmax = 0.53 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.43 e Å3
Crystal data top
[CuCl2(C16H19N3)]·0.5C4H10OV = 3995.6 (3) Å3
Mr = 424.84Z = 8
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation
a = 22.1614 (13) ŵ = 1.37 mm1
b = 11.5738 (5) ÅT = 150 K
c = 16.4530 (7) Å0.50 × 0.28 × 0.10 mm
β = 108.771 (1)°
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII
diffractometer
6872 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
5660 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.471, Tmax = 0.840Rint = 0.025
24823 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0280 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.072H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03Δρmax = 0.53 e Å3
6872 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.43 e Å3
223 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.15616 (2)0.59899 (2)0.13662 (2)0.01989 (5)
Cl10.09795 (2)0.43892 (3)0.13435 (2)0.03418 (8)
Cl20.25976 (2)0.52731 (3)0.12375 (2)0.02394 (7)
N10.18137 (5)0.77181 (9)0.14348 (6)0.01978 (19)
N20.11788 (5)0.64014 (9)0.01190 (7)0.0215 (2)
N30.19179 (5)0.61566 (9)0.26406 (7)0.0223 (2)
C10.19332 (6)0.79568 (11)0.06162 (8)0.0219 (2)
H1A0.23630.76790.06500.026*
H1B0.19150.88000.05080.026*
C20.14371 (6)0.73526 (11)0.01065 (8)0.0205 (2)
C30.12747 (6)0.77160 (12)0.09536 (8)0.0240 (2)
H30.14600.83930.10990.029*
C40.08364 (6)0.70725 (13)0.15849 (8)0.0275 (3)
H40.07280.72890.21710.033*
C50.05600 (7)0.61125 (13)0.13490 (9)0.0287 (3)
H50.02510.56740.17700.034*
C60.07399 (6)0.57991 (12)0.04920 (9)0.0263 (3)
H60.05490.51410.03310.032*
C70.23897 (6)0.78269 (11)0.22018 (8)0.0223 (2)
H7A0.24400.86380.24030.027*
H7B0.27730.76070.20530.027*
C80.23224 (6)0.70480 (11)0.29021 (8)0.0219 (2)
C90.26692 (7)0.72191 (12)0.37617 (9)0.0284 (3)
H90.29560.78500.39350.034*
C100.25854 (8)0.64431 (13)0.43618 (9)0.0315 (3)
H100.28250.65250.49520.038*
C110.21516 (7)0.55514 (13)0.40935 (9)0.0298 (3)
H110.20760.50340.44990.036*
C120.18308 (7)0.54244 (12)0.32283 (9)0.0263 (3)
H120.15400.48020.30420.032*
C130.12613 (6)0.83899 (11)0.15197 (9)0.0250 (2)
H13A0.11820.81390.20520.030*
H13B0.08790.81870.10310.030*
C140.13334 (8)0.97031 (13)0.15463 (11)0.0370 (3)
H14A0.17190.99220.20240.044*
H14B0.13870.99760.10030.044*
C150.07651 (10)1.02672 (16)0.16678 (14)0.0517 (5)
H150.06481.00310.21500.062*
C160.04196 (14)1.1043 (2)0.1180 (2)0.0866 (9)
H16A0.05191.13060.06910.104*
H16B0.00641.13560.13080.104*
O10.50000.71720 (17)0.75000.0552 (5)
C170.46509 (12)0.7851 (2)0.6791 (2)0.0809 (9)
H17A0.49480.82920.65700.097*
H17B0.43810.84090.69730.097*
C180.42468 (16)0.7095 (4)0.6110 (2)0.1069 (12)
H18A0.40160.75640.56100.160*
H18B0.39410.66870.63230.160*
H18C0.45150.65310.59420.160*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.02130 (8)0.01992 (8)0.01888 (8)0.00387 (5)0.00706 (6)0.00069 (5)
Cl10.03288 (17)0.03282 (17)0.03443 (18)0.01494 (14)0.00746 (14)0.00510 (13)
Cl20.02487 (14)0.02391 (14)0.02458 (14)0.00119 (11)0.01009 (11)0.00181 (11)
N10.0212 (5)0.0208 (5)0.0182 (5)0.0017 (4)0.0076 (4)0.0003 (4)
N20.0209 (5)0.0229 (5)0.0205 (5)0.0029 (4)0.0064 (4)0.0002 (4)
N30.0255 (5)0.0233 (5)0.0203 (5)0.0010 (4)0.0106 (4)0.0013 (4)
C10.0241 (6)0.0234 (6)0.0193 (5)0.0051 (4)0.0083 (5)0.0001 (4)
C20.0202 (5)0.0217 (6)0.0207 (5)0.0004 (4)0.0081 (4)0.0004 (4)
C30.0223 (6)0.0292 (6)0.0214 (6)0.0015 (5)0.0082 (5)0.0034 (5)
C40.0254 (6)0.0367 (7)0.0195 (6)0.0040 (5)0.0058 (5)0.0017 (5)
C50.0243 (6)0.0344 (7)0.0237 (6)0.0024 (5)0.0024 (5)0.0041 (5)
C60.0228 (6)0.0290 (7)0.0250 (6)0.0049 (5)0.0048 (5)0.0016 (5)
C70.0247 (6)0.0214 (6)0.0199 (5)0.0034 (4)0.0061 (5)0.0011 (4)
C80.0251 (6)0.0212 (6)0.0202 (5)0.0029 (4)0.0081 (5)0.0011 (4)
C90.0364 (7)0.0254 (6)0.0211 (6)0.0046 (5)0.0060 (5)0.0027 (5)
C100.0433 (8)0.0305 (7)0.0196 (6)0.0122 (6)0.0089 (6)0.0005 (5)
C110.0383 (7)0.0302 (7)0.0251 (6)0.0110 (6)0.0161 (6)0.0078 (5)
C120.0303 (6)0.0267 (6)0.0257 (6)0.0031 (5)0.0142 (5)0.0056 (5)
C130.0271 (6)0.0240 (6)0.0255 (6)0.0033 (5)0.0107 (5)0.0002 (5)
C140.0349 (8)0.0245 (7)0.0458 (9)0.0048 (6)0.0048 (7)0.0025 (6)
C150.0609 (12)0.0382 (9)0.0612 (12)0.0139 (8)0.0269 (10)0.0075 (8)
C160.0783 (18)0.0776 (18)0.095 (2)0.0474 (15)0.0156 (16)0.0047 (15)
O10.0521 (11)0.0461 (11)0.0708 (13)0.0000.0244 (10)0.000
C170.0600 (14)0.0728 (17)0.124 (2)0.0280 (13)0.0496 (16)0.0421 (16)
C180.0760 (19)0.158 (4)0.078 (2)0.036 (2)0.0130 (16)0.035 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—N31.9980 (11)C8—C91.3895 (18)
Cu1—N22.0093 (11)C9—C101.391 (2)
Cu1—N12.0700 (10)C9—H90.9500
Cu1—Cl12.2508 (4)C10—C111.383 (2)
Cu1—Cl22.5134 (4)C10—H100.9500
N1—C11.4800 (15)C11—C121.379 (2)
N1—C71.4837 (16)C11—H110.9500
N1—C131.4942 (16)C12—H120.9500
N2—C61.3466 (16)C13—C141.527 (2)
N2—C21.3469 (16)C13—H13A0.9900
N3—C81.3434 (17)C13—H13B0.9900
N3—C121.3455 (16)C14—C151.488 (2)
C1—C21.5067 (17)C14—H14A0.9900
C1—H1A0.9900C14—H14B0.9900
C1—H1B0.9900C15—C161.281 (3)
C2—C31.3878 (17)C15—H150.9500
C3—C41.3883 (19)C16—H16A0.9500
C3—H30.9500C16—H16B0.9500
C4—C51.383 (2)O1—C17i1.413 (3)
C4—H40.9500O1—C171.413 (3)
C5—C61.3845 (19)C17—C181.476 (4)
C5—H50.9500C17—H17A0.9900
C6—H60.9500C17—H17B0.9900
C7—C81.5077 (17)C18—H18A0.9800
C7—H7A0.9900C18—H18B0.9800
C7—H7B0.9900C18—H18C0.9800
N3—Cu1—N2160.62 (5)H7A—C7—H7B108.3
N3—Cu1—N180.84 (4)N3—C8—C9121.93 (12)
N2—Cu1—N181.05 (4)N3—C8—C7115.75 (11)
N3—Cu1—Cl197.34 (3)C9—C8—C7122.30 (12)
N2—Cu1—Cl197.28 (3)C8—C9—C10118.31 (13)
N1—Cu1—Cl1159.94 (3)C8—C9—H9120.8
N3—Cu1—Cl293.27 (3)C10—C9—H9120.8
N2—Cu1—Cl295.11 (3)C11—C10—C9119.57 (13)
N1—Cu1—Cl294.92 (3)C11—C10—H10120.2
Cl1—Cu1—Cl2105.136 (14)C9—C10—H10120.2
C1—N1—C7113.65 (9)C12—C11—C10118.92 (13)
C1—N1—C13112.33 (10)C12—C11—H11120.5
C7—N1—C13112.52 (10)C10—C11—H11120.5
C1—N1—Cu1104.77 (7)N3—C12—C11121.94 (13)
C7—N1—Cu1105.76 (7)N3—C12—H12119.0
C13—N1—Cu1107.05 (8)C11—C12—H12119.0
C6—N2—C2119.11 (11)N1—C13—C14116.05 (11)
C6—N2—Cu1127.29 (9)N1—C13—H13A108.3
C2—N2—Cu1113.44 (8)C14—C13—H13A108.3
C8—N3—C12119.27 (11)N1—C13—H13B108.3
C8—N3—Cu1114.07 (8)C14—C13—H13B108.3
C12—N3—Cu1126.42 (9)H13A—C13—H13B107.4
N1—C1—C2109.43 (10)C15—C14—C13110.80 (14)
N1—C1—H1A109.8C15—C14—H14A109.5
C2—C1—H1A109.8C13—C14—H14A109.5
N1—C1—H1B109.8C15—C14—H14B109.5
C2—C1—H1B109.8C13—C14—H14B109.5
H1A—C1—H1B108.2H14A—C14—H14B108.1
N2—C2—C3121.90 (12)C16—C15—C14125.8 (2)
N2—C2—C1115.39 (10)C16—C15—H15117.1
C3—C2—C1122.65 (11)C14—C15—H15117.1
C2—C3—C4118.80 (12)C15—C16—H16A120.0
C2—C3—H3120.6C15—C16—H16B120.0
C4—C3—H3120.6H16A—C16—H16B120.0
C5—C4—C3119.17 (12)C17i—O1—C17112.4 (3)
C5—C4—H4120.4O1—C17—C18109.5 (2)
C3—C4—H4120.4O1—C17—H17A109.8
C4—C5—C6119.20 (13)C18—C17—H17A109.8
C4—C5—H5120.4O1—C17—H17B109.8
C6—C5—H5120.4C18—C17—H17B109.8
N2—C6—C5121.79 (13)H17A—C17—H17B108.2
N2—C6—H6119.1C17—C18—H18A109.5
C5—C6—H6119.1C17—C18—H18B109.5
N1—C7—C8109.24 (10)H18A—C18—H18B109.5
N1—C7—H7A109.8C17—C18—H18C109.5
C8—C7—H7A109.8H18A—C18—H18C109.5
N1—C7—H7B109.8H18B—C18—H18C109.5
C8—C7—H7B109.8
C7—N1—C1—C2155.62 (10)C12—N3—C8—C91.93 (19)
C13—N1—C1—C275.20 (13)Cu1—N3—C8—C9172.73 (10)
Cu1—N1—C1—C240.65 (11)C12—N3—C8—C7179.82 (11)
C6—N2—C2—C31.47 (18)Cu1—N3—C8—C75.52 (14)
Cu1—N2—C2—C3174.32 (10)N1—C7—C8—N322.88 (15)
C6—N2—C2—C1178.80 (11)N1—C7—C8—C9158.88 (12)
Cu1—N2—C2—C13.00 (13)N3—C8—C9—C100.6 (2)
N1—C1—C2—N226.50 (15)C7—C8—C9—C10178.72 (12)
N1—C1—C2—C3156.20 (11)C8—C9—C10—C111.8 (2)
N2—C2—C3—C40.47 (19)C9—C10—C11—C122.7 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C4176.66 (12)C8—N3—C12—C110.91 (19)
C2—C3—C4—C52.0 (2)Cu1—N3—C12—C11173.03 (10)
C3—C4—C5—C61.7 (2)C10—C11—C12—N31.4 (2)
C2—N2—C6—C51.8 (2)C1—N1—C13—C1463.24 (15)
Cu1—N2—C6—C5173.32 (10)C7—N1—C13—C1466.53 (14)
C4—C5—C6—N20.2 (2)Cu1—N1—C13—C14177.71 (10)
C1—N1—C7—C8152.29 (10)N1—C13—C14—C15177.66 (13)
C13—N1—C7—C878.63 (12)C13—C14—C15—C16125.1 (3)
Cu1—N1—C7—C837.91 (11)C17i—O1—C17—C18174.1 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z+3/2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C3—H3···Cl2ii0.952.673.5541 (15)156
C11—H11···Cl2iii0.952.743.4767 (15)135
C14—H14A···Cl2iv0.992.803.7127 (18)153
Symmetry codes: (ii) x+1/2, y+3/2, z; (iii) x, y+1, z+1/2; (iv) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1/2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C3—H3···Cl2i0.952.673.5541 (15)156
C11—H11···Cl2ii0.952.743.4767 (15)135
C14—H14A···Cl2iii0.992.803.7127 (18)153
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, y+3/2, z; (ii) x, y+1, z+1/2; (iii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1/2.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula[CuCl2(C16H19N3)]·0.5C4H10O
Mr424.84
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)150
a, b, c (Å)22.1614 (13), 11.5738 (5), 16.4530 (7)
β (°) 108.771 (1)
V3)3995.6 (3)
Z8
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)1.37
Crystal size (mm)0.50 × 0.28 × 0.10
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII
diffractometer
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
Tmin, Tmax0.471, 0.840
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
24823, 6872, 5660
Rint0.025
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.758
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.028, 0.072, 1.03
No. of reflections6872
No. of parameters223
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.53, 0.43

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2010), SAINT (Bruker, 2010), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006) and POV-RAY (Cason, 2013), publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

 

Acknowledgements

KDO wishes to thank all undergraduate research students listed for their contributions to this project; Duquesne University and the University of Notre Dame for instrumentation support; Cambridge Isotope Laboratories Inc., the American Chemical Society, Saint Mary's College, and Eli Lilly & Company for funding support.

References

First citationAddison, A. W., Rao, T. N., Reedijk, J., van Rijn, J. & Verschoor, G. C. (1984). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 1349–1356.  CSD CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBrandenburg, K. (2006). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.  Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2010). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationCarvalho, N. F., Horn, A., Bortoluzzi, A. J., Drago, V. & Antunes, O. A. (2006). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 359, 90–98.  CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationCason, C. J. (2013). POV-RAY. Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd, Victoria, Australia.  Google Scholar
First citationGroom, C. R. & Allen, F. H. (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 662–671.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationKrause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMatyjaszewski, K., Gobelt, B., Paik, H. & Horwitz, C. (2001). Macromolecules, 34, 430–440.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationPintauer, T. & Matyjaszewski, K. (2005). Coord. Chem. Rev. 249, 1155–1184.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 71| Part 3| March 2015| Pages 309-311
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds