research communications
κO)xenon(II), Xe(SO3F)2
of bis(fluorosulfato-aFreie Universität Berlin, Institut für Chemie und Biochemie – Anorganische Chemie, Fabeckstrasse 34-36, 14195 Berlin, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: m-mali@hotmail.de
Thermally unstable Xe(SO3F)2 has been prepared by the reaction of XeF2 with HSO3F. Single crystals were obtained from HSO3F by slow cooling in a sealed tube. The molecular structure is characterized by the Xe atom covalently bonded to two O atoms of two fluorosulfate tetrahedra in an almost linear fashion [O—Xe—O = 179.13 (4)°]. The crystal packing is strongly influenced by intermolecular van der Waals forces.
Keywords: crystal structure; xenon; fluorosulfate; oxidizer; noble gas; xenon–oxygen compound; superacid.
CCDC reference: 1052852
1. Chemical context
In 1972, Neil Bartlett published data on the 3F)2 (Wechsberg et al., 1972). As a result of the thermal instability of this compound, no further structural details were given at that time, but 19F and 129Xe NMR spectra were reported subsequently (Gillespie et al., 1974; Schrobilgen et al., 1978). The decomposition of Xe(SO3F)2 leads cleanly to Xe and S2O6F2.
of Xe(SO2. Structural commentary
Analogous to XeF2 (Agron et al., 1963), the two-coordinated xenon atom adopts a linear geometry [angle O1—Xe—O4 = 179.13 (4)°]. The molecule has nearly Ci symmetry, with the xenon atom at the pseudo-inversion centre (Fig. 1). This finding is in contrast to earlier reports, where Cs symmetry was discussed based on Raman spectroscopic data (Gillespie & Landa, 1973). The Xe—O bonds are 2.1101 (13) and 2.1225 (13) Å, which is typical for Xe—O single bonds, whereas Xe=O double bonds are considerably shorter with lengths ≃ 1.75 Å. The related compound xenon fluoride fluorosulfate, XeF(OSO2F) (Bartlett et al., 1969, 1972), contains a Xe—O bond that is slightly longer [2.155 (8) Å] than in the title compound, but the Xe—F bond of XeF(OSO2F) is at 1.940 (8) Å shorter than that in XeF2 (2.00 Å). For XeF(OSO2F), partial ionic bonding (XeF+·OSO2F−) was discussed. Obviously, both XeF2 and Xe(SO3F)2 have a higher covalent character. The S—O bonds in Xe(SO3F)2 involving the O atoms that are also bonded to the xenon atom (S1—O1 and S2—O4) are about 0.1 Å longer than the terminal S—O bonds (Table 1), indicating partial double-bond character.
|
3. Supramolecular features
The crystal packing (Fig. 2) is strongly influenced by intermolecular van der Waals interactions to seven oxygen atoms and two fluorine atoms (Table 2). Whereas the xenon atom in XeF2 exhibits intermolecular interactions to eight fluorine atoms (distance 3.42 Å; Agron et al., 1963), XeF(OSO2F) has fewer contacts (five contacts to oxygen in the range 3.28–3.49 Å and one contact to fluorine of 3.39 Å; Bartlett et al., 1972).
4. Synthesis and crystallization
550 mg fluorosulfuric acid were placed in a 8 mm PFA tube. 170 mg (1 mmol) of XeF2 were added and the mixture vigorously shaken at room temperature for some minutes until all XeF2 had dissolved. The PFA tube was evacuated for some seconds to remove HF, then frozen with liquid nitrogen and sealed. The yellow product (≃ 0.2 ml) was warmed to 273 K and the PFA tube placed in a dewar filled with 273 K ethanol and cooled slowly to 193 K in a freezer. The light-yellow single crystals of Xe(SO3F)2 that had formed were decanted off and mounted in a cold nitrogen stream. At 100 K, the crystals are colorless. The compound decomposes rapidly in moist air and can ignite organic materials.
5. details
Crystal data, data collection and structure .
details are summarized in Table 3Supporting information
CCDC reference: 1052852
10.1107/S2056989015004788/wm5134sup1.cif
contains datablock I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015004788/wm5134Isup2.hkl
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2006); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2006); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2006); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).[Xe(SO3F)2] | F(000) = 608 |
Mr = 329.42 | Dx = 3.194 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/n | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2yn | Cell parameters from 999 reflections |
a = 6.706 (3) Å | θ = 2.0–21.0° |
b = 13.237 (6) Å | µ = 5.66 mm−1 |
c = 7.769 (3) Å | T = 100 K |
β = 96.50 (3)° | Irregular, colorless |
V = 685.2 (5) Å3 | 0.50 × 0.40 × 0.15 mm |
Z = 4 |
Bruker CCD SMART 2000 diffractometer | 2096 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1978 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.020 |
ω scans | θmax = 30.6°, θmin = 3.1° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2006) | h = −9→8 |
Tmin = 0.545, Tmax = 1.000 | k = −18→18 |
11036 measured reflections | l = −11→9 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.013 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0151P)2 + 0.4262P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
wR(F2) = 0.033 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.002 |
S = 1.11 | Δρmax = 0.56 e Å−3 |
2096 reflections | Δρmin = −0.69 e Å−3 |
101 parameters | Extinction correction: SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
0 restraints | Extinction coefficient: 0.0244 (5) |
Geometry. All s.u.'s (except the s.u. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell s.u.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of s.u.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between s.u.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell s.u.'s is used for estimating s.u.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Xe1 | 0.000928 (13) | 0.627394 (6) | 0.726096 (13) | 0.01145 (4) | |
S1 | −0.33404 (6) | 0.46260 (3) | 0.75371 (5) | 0.01295 (8) | |
S2 | 0.32649 (6) | 0.79932 (3) | 0.70775 (5) | 0.01265 (8) | |
O4 | 0.24243 (18) | 0.72199 (8) | 0.82568 (16) | 0.0155 (2) | |
F2 | 0.51324 (16) | 0.74159 (8) | 0.65972 (16) | 0.0227 (2) | |
O2 | −0.22016 (19) | 0.45699 (9) | 0.91739 (17) | 0.0190 (2) | |
F1 | −0.52083 (16) | 0.52658 (9) | 0.78020 (16) | 0.0255 (2) | |
O6 | 0.4027 (2) | 0.88225 (8) | 0.80947 (18) | 0.0181 (2) | |
O5 | 0.2017 (2) | 0.81316 (9) | 0.55006 (17) | 0.0202 (3) | |
O3 | −0.4069 (2) | 0.37545 (9) | 0.6629 (2) | 0.0218 (3) | |
O1 | −0.23650 (18) | 0.53141 (9) | 0.62828 (16) | 0.0168 (2) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Xe1 | 0.01151 (6) | 0.01094 (6) | 0.01174 (7) | −0.00098 (3) | 0.00068 (3) | 0.00171 (3) |
S1 | 0.01200 (16) | 0.01179 (15) | 0.0150 (2) | −0.00106 (12) | 0.00137 (13) | 0.00063 (13) |
S2 | 0.01379 (17) | 0.01185 (15) | 0.01261 (19) | −0.00147 (12) | 0.00274 (13) | −0.00024 (13) |
O4 | 0.0159 (5) | 0.0156 (5) | 0.0143 (6) | −0.0052 (4) | −0.0010 (4) | 0.0026 (4) |
F2 | 0.0194 (5) | 0.0234 (5) | 0.0268 (6) | 0.0023 (4) | 0.0093 (4) | −0.0049 (4) |
O2 | 0.0216 (6) | 0.0210 (5) | 0.0141 (6) | −0.0027 (5) | 0.0004 (5) | 0.0033 (5) |
F1 | 0.0158 (5) | 0.0232 (5) | 0.0382 (7) | 0.0055 (4) | 0.0064 (5) | −0.0005 (5) |
O6 | 0.0221 (6) | 0.0147 (5) | 0.0181 (7) | −0.0052 (4) | 0.0047 (5) | −0.0038 (4) |
O5 | 0.0240 (6) | 0.0219 (6) | 0.0141 (6) | −0.0038 (5) | −0.0006 (5) | 0.0044 (5) |
O3 | 0.0243 (6) | 0.0164 (6) | 0.0248 (8) | −0.0070 (4) | 0.0026 (5) | −0.0041 (5) |
O1 | 0.0167 (5) | 0.0191 (5) | 0.0139 (6) | −0.0064 (4) | −0.0022 (4) | 0.0033 (4) |
Xe1—O1 | 2.1101 (13) | S1—F1 | 1.5449 (12) |
Xe1—O4 | 2.1225 (13) | S2—O6 | 1.4141 (13) |
S1—O3 | 1.4103 (13) | S2—O5 | 1.4150 (14) |
S1—O2 | 1.4092 (14) | S2—O4 | 1.5237 (13) |
S1—O1 | 1.5334 (13) | S2—F2 | 1.5483 (12) |
Xe1···O2 | 3.1613 (15) | Xe1···F1iv | 3.4551 (17) |
Xe1···O5 | 3.1855 (16) | Xe1···O3v | 3.4707 (19) |
Xe1···O2i | 3.1872 (17) | Xe1···O5vi | 3.4818 (18) |
Xe1···O6ii | 3.2317 (19) | Xe1···F2vii | 3.5867 (17) |
Xe1···O6iii | 3.3262 (18) | ||
O1—Xe1—O4 | 179.13 (4) | O6—S2—O4 | 108.69 (8) |
O3—S1—O2 | 122.00 (8) | O5—S2—O4 | 112.64 (8) |
O3—S1—O1 | 108.46 (8) | O6—S2—F2 | 105.47 (8) |
O2—S1—O1 | 112.23 (7) | O5—S2—F2 | 105.68 (8) |
O3—S1—F1 | 105.94 (8) | O4—S2—F2 | 100.24 (7) |
O2—S1—F1 | 105.86 (8) | S2—O4—Xe1 | 119.74 (7) |
O1—S1—F1 | 99.77 (7) | S1—O1—Xe1 | 119.18 (7) |
O6—S2—O5 | 121.62 (8) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+1, −z+2; (ii) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z−1/2; (iii) −x+1/2, y−1/2, −z+3/2; (iv) x+1, y, z; (v) −x−1/2, y+1/2, −z+3/2; (vi) x−1/2, −y+3/2, z+1/2; (vii) x−1, y, z. |
Atoms | Distance | Symmetry code |
Xe1···O2 | 3.1613 (15) | |
Xe1···O5 | 3.1855 (16) | |
Xe1···O2i | 3.1872 (17) | i) -x, -y+1, -z+2 |
Xe1···O6ii | 3.2317 (19) | ii) x-1/2, -y+3/2, z-1/2 |
Xe1···O6iii | 3.3262 (18) | iii) -x+1/2, y-1/2, -z+3/2 |
Xe1···F1iv | 3.4551 (17) | iv) x+1, y, z |
Xe1···O3v | 3.4707 (19) | v) -x-1/2, y+1/2, -z+3/2 |
Xe1···O5vi | 3.4818 (18) | vi) x-1/2, -y+3/2, z+1/2 |
Xe1···F2vii | 3.5867 (17) | vii) x-1, y, z |
Acknowledgements
MM acknowledges funding by the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie FCI.
References
Agron, P. A., Begun, G. M., Levy, H. A., Mason, A. A., Jones, C. G. & Smith, D. F. (1963). Science, 139, 842–844. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bartlett, N., Wechsberg, M., Jones, G. R. & Burbank, R. D. (1972). Inorg. Chem. 11, 1124–1127. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bartlett, N., Wechsberg, M., Sladky, F. O., Bulliner, P. A., Jones, G. R. & Burbank, R. D. (1969). J. Chem. Soc. D, pp. 703–704. Google Scholar
Brandenburg, K. (1999). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Bruker (2006). SMART, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Gillespie, R. J. & Landa, B. (1973). Inorg. Chem. 12, 1383–1389. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Gillespie, R. J., Netzer, A. & Schrobilgen, G. J. (1974). Inorg. Chem. 13, 1455–1459. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Schrobilgen, G. J., Holloway, J. H., Granger, P. & Brevard, C. (1978). Inorg. Chem. 17, 980–987. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wechsberg, M., Bulliner, P. A., Sladky, F. O., Mews, R. & Bartlett, N. (1972). Inorg. Chem. 11, 3063–3070. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.