organic compounds
of 4-formylpyridine semicarbazone hemihydrate
aUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Química, C.P. 19081, CEP 81531-980, Curitiba – PR, Brazil, and bUniversidade Federal do Santa Maria, Departamento de Química, CEP 97105-900, Santa Maria – RS, Brazil
*Correspondence e-mail: fsnunes@ufpr.br
The molecule of the title compound C7H8N4O·0.5H2O, alternatively called (E)-1-(pyridin-4-ylmethylene)semicarbazide hemihydrate, is in the E conformation and is almost planar; the r.m.s. deviation of the positions of the atoms of the pyridine ring from the best-fit plane is 0.0039 Å. The C, N and O atoms of the rest of the molecule sits close on this plane with a largest deviation of 0.115 (4) Å for the O atom of the semicarbazone moiety. There is an intramolecular N—H⋯N hydrogen bond. In the crystal, molecules are linked into an infinite three-dimensional network by classical N—H⋯Os (s = semicarbazone) and Ow—H⋯N (w = water) hydrogen bonds.
CCDC reference: 1059160
1. Related literature
For the preparation of coordination compounds of 4-formylpyridine semicarbazone with cobalt and zinc, see: Zhou et al. (2006a,b). For the spectroscopic (FT–IR, NMR and UV–vis) properties of 4- and 3-formylpyridine see: Beraldo et al. (2001). For the of 4-formylpyridine thiosemicarbazone, see: Restivo & Palenik (1970). For the crystal structures of 2-formylpyridine semicarbazone and several coordination compounds published by our group, see: Garbelini et al. (2008, 2009, 2011, 2012). Geometrical analysis was performed with Mogul (Bruno et al., 2004).
2. Experimental
2.1. Crystal data
|
2.3. Refinement
|
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2014); cell SAINT (Bruker, 2014); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT2014 (Sheldrick, 2015); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Crystal Impact, 2014); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL2014.
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 1059160
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989015007276/lr2134sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989015007276/lr2134Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989015007276/lr2134Isup3.cml
The title molecule crystallizes in the E conformation and is almost ideally planar. The root mean square deviation of the postions of the atoms of the pyridine ring (C3/C4/C5/C6/C7/N4) from the best fit plane is 0.0039 Å. The C, N & O atoms of the rest of the molecule sits close on this plane with the largest deviation of 0.115 (4) Å for O1. The torsion angles of the side arm, C1—N2—N3—C2 (-174.35 (11)°, N2—N3—C2—C3 (-177.87 (10)° and N3—C2—C3—C6 (-1.76 (18)°) reflect this planarity. The shorter bond distance between C2 and N3 of 1.2752 (15) Å compared with 1.3366 (18) Å of N2—C1 along with the double bond character of C1=O1 at 1.2399 (14) Å is in accordance with the carbonyl tautomeric form. The longer than normal double bond length for N2—N3, 1.3706 (13) Å, and shorter than normal single bond length for C2—C3, 1.4616 (15) Å, indicates a resonance of the side chain with the pyridine ring.
There is an extensive three dimensional network of hydrogen bonding interactions formed between the 4-formylpyridine semicarbazone molecules, N2—H2N···O1 = 2.022 (18)Å and N1—H1NB···O1 = 1.998 (19)Å, and between the pyridine N4 atoms of the 4-formylpyridine semicarbazone molecules and the water molecules, O1W—H1WA···N4 = 2.077 (18)Å.
An analysis of the geometry of the 4-formylpyridine semicarbazone molecule with Mogul (Bruno et al., 2004) showed all bond lengths, bond angles, dihedral angles and ring geometry as not unusual, with the largest |z-score| = 1.254 for the C6–C3–C2 angle.
Reagent grade chemicals were used in this work. The compound was prepared based on a similar reaction for the 2-formylpyridine semicarbazone (Garbelini et al. 2009).
In an round bottom flask 2.4 g (21 mmol) of semicarbazide hydrochloride were dissolved in 20 mL of ethanol and 5 mL of water and mixed with 1.7 g (21 mmol) of sodium acetate and 15 mL of water. The mixture was kept under stirring and heating at 70°C until the complete dissolution. Then, 2.0 mL (21 mmol) of 4-formylpyridine was added and the resulting solution was cooled at -15 °C overnight. Colourless crystals were collected by filtration, washed with water and cold ethanol and dried under vacuum. The yield was 2.3 g (67%).
Crystal data, data collection and structure
details are summarized in Table 1. Crystal data, data collection and structure details are summarized in Table 1. Crystal data, data collection and structure details are summarized in Table 1. The final structure was refined with SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015) with anisotropic displacement parameters for all non-hydrogen atoms; hydrogen atoms were refined isotropically as riding atoms at their theoretical ideal positions. Drawings were made with Crystal Impact Diamond 3.The title molecule crystallizes in the E conformation and is almost ideally planar. The root mean square deviation of the postions of the atoms of the pyridine ring (C3/C4/C5/C6/C7/N4) from the best fit plane is 0.0039 Å. The C, N & O atoms of the rest of the molecule sits close on this plane with the largest deviation of 0.115 (4) Å for O1. The torsion angles of the side arm, C1—N2—N3—C2 (-174.35 (11)°, N2—N3—C2—C3 (-177.87 (10)° and N3—C2—C3—C6 (-1.76 (18)°) reflect this planarity. The shorter bond distance between C2 and N3 of 1.2752 (15) Å compared with 1.3366 (18) Å of N2—C1 along with the double bond character of C1=O1 at 1.2399 (14) Å is in accordance with the carbonyl tautomeric form. The longer than normal double bond length for N2—N3, 1.3706 (13) Å, and shorter than normal single bond length for C2—C3, 1.4616 (15) Å, indicates a resonance of the side chain with the pyridine ring.
There is an extensive three dimensional network of hydrogen bonding interactions formed between the 4-formylpyridine semicarbazone molecules, N2—H2N···O1 = 2.022 (18)Å and N1—H1NB···O1 = 1.998 (19)Å, and between the pyridine N4 atoms of the 4-formylpyridine semicarbazone molecules and the water molecules, O1W—H1WA···N4 = 2.077 (18)Å.
An analysis of the geometry of the 4-formylpyridine semicarbazone molecule with Mogul (Bruno et al., 2004) showed all bond lengths, bond angles, dihedral angles and ring geometry as not unusual, with the largest |z-score| = 1.254 for the C6–C3–C2 angle.
For the preparation of coordination compounds of 4-formylpyridine semicarbazone with cobalt and zinc, see: Zhou et al. (2006a,b). For the spectroscopic (FT–IR, NMR and UV–vis) properties of 4- and 3-formylpyridine
see: Beraldo et al. (2001). For the of 4-formylpyridine thiosemicarbazone, see: Restivo & Palenik (1970). For the crystal structures of 2-formylpyridine semicarbazone and several coordination compounds published by our group, see: Garbelini et al. (2008, 2009, 2011, 2012). Geometrical analysis was performed with Mogul (Bruno et al., 2004).Reagent grade chemicals were used in this work. The compound was prepared based on a similar reaction for the 2-formylpyridine semicarbazone (Garbelini et al. 2009).
In an round bottom flask 2.4 g (21 mmol) of semicarbazide hydrochloride were dissolved in 20 mL of ethanol and 5 mL of water and mixed with 1.7 g (21 mmol) of sodium acetate and 15 mL of water. The mixture was kept under stirring and heating at 70°C until the complete dissolution. Then, 2.0 mL (21 mmol) of 4-formylpyridine was added and the resulting solution was cooled at -15 °C overnight. Colourless crystals were collected by filtration, washed with water and cold ethanol and dried under vacuum. The yield was 2.3 g (67%).
detailsCrystal data, data collection and structure
details are summarized in Table 1. Crystal data, data collection and structure details are summarized in Table 1. Crystal data, data collection and structure details are summarized in Table 1. The final structure was refined with SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015) with anisotropic displacement parameters for all non-hydrogen atoms; hydrogen atoms were refined isotropically as riding atoms at their theoretical ideal positions. Drawings were made with Crystal Impact Diamond 3.Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2014); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2014); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2014); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT2014 (Sheldrick, 2015); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Crystal Impact, 2014); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015).Fig. 1. View of the title molecule.Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. | |
Fig. 2. The molecular packing viewed down the crystallograpic b axis, with the a axis pointed down, showing the three dimensional hydrogen bonding network. |
2C7H8N4O·H2O | F(000) = 728 |
Mr = 346.36 | Dx = 1.413 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 25.0636 (13) Å | Cell parameters from 5941 reflections |
b = 5.3725 (3) Å | θ = 2.8–26.2° |
c = 13.0124 (7) Å | µ = 0.11 mm−1 |
β = 111.717 (3)° | T = 296 K |
V = 1627.81 (16) Å3 | Block, clear light colourless |
Z = 4 | 0.82 × 0.27 × 0.20 mm |
Bruker X8 Kappa APEXII diffractometer | 1795 independent reflections |
Radiation source: sealed ceramic X ray tube, Siemens KFF | 1502 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite crystal monochromator | Rint = 0.029 |
Detector resolution: 8.3333 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 27.1°, θmin = 1.8° |
0.5 ° ω & φ scans | h = −32→32 |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014) | k = −6→6 |
Tmin = 0.860, Tmax = 0.937 | l = −16→16 |
20739 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: mixed |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
wR(F2) = 0.094 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0436P)2 + 0.8364P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.04 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
1795 reflections | Δρmax = 0.23 e Å−3 |
127 parameters | Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 |
1 restraint | Extinction correction: SHELXL |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.0067 (8) |
2C7H8N4O·H2O | V = 1627.81 (16) Å3 |
Mr = 346.36 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, C2/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 25.0636 (13) Å | µ = 0.11 mm−1 |
b = 5.3725 (3) Å | T = 296 K |
c = 13.0124 (7) Å | 0.82 × 0.27 × 0.20 mm |
β = 111.717 (3)° |
Bruker X8 Kappa APEXII diffractometer | 1795 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014) | 1502 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.860, Tmax = 0.937 | Rint = 0.029 |
20739 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034 | 1 restraint |
wR(F2) = 0.094 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
S = 1.04 | Δρmax = 0.23 e Å−3 |
1795 reflections | Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 |
127 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
O1 | 0.74966 (4) | −0.16017 (16) | 0.36432 (7) | 0.0411 (2) | |
N1 | 0.70517 (5) | 0.2096 (2) | 0.30449 (9) | 0.0410 (3) | |
H1NA | 0.6859 (8) | 0.326 (3) | 0.3188 (14) | 0.061* | |
H1NB | 0.7226 (7) | 0.234 (3) | 0.2545 (15) | 0.061* | |
N2 | 0.69806 (5) | 0.00971 (19) | 0.45499 (9) | 0.0373 (3) | |
H2N | 0.7110 (7) | −0.107 (3) | 0.5079 (14) | 0.056* | |
N3 | 0.66491 (4) | 0.20246 (18) | 0.46659 (8) | 0.0336 (3) | |
N4 | 0.54246 (5) | 0.7238 (2) | 0.61921 (10) | 0.0430 (3) | |
C1 | 0.71939 (5) | 0.0154 (2) | 0.37260 (9) | 0.0315 (3) | |
C2 | 0.65096 (5) | 0.1908 (2) | 0.55129 (10) | 0.0329 (3) | |
H2 | 0.6646 | 0.0596 | 0.6007 | 0.039* | |
C3 | 0.61410 (5) | 0.3783 (2) | 0.57272 (9) | 0.0309 (3) | |
C4 | 0.59797 (5) | 0.3495 (2) | 0.66315 (10) | 0.0374 (3) | |
H4 | 0.6108 | 0.2134 | 0.71 | 0.045* | |
C5 | 0.56274 (6) | 0.5251 (3) | 0.68271 (11) | 0.0431 (3) | |
H5 | 0.5526 | 0.5034 | 0.744 | 0.052* | |
C6 | 0.59294 (5) | 0.5840 (2) | 0.50545 (10) | 0.0369 (3) | |
H6 | 0.6025 | 0.6106 | 0.4437 | 0.044* | |
C7 | 0.55757 (6) | 0.7483 (2) | 0.53140 (11) | 0.0411 (3) | |
H7 | 0.5434 | 0.8843 | 0.4851 | 0.049* | |
O1W | 0.5 | 1.0598 (3) | 0.75 | 0.1046 (9) | |
H1WA | 0.5078 (14) | 0.965 (5) | 0.703 (2) | 0.157* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
O1 | 0.0538 (6) | 0.0380 (5) | 0.0420 (5) | 0.0108 (4) | 0.0303 (4) | 0.0010 (4) |
N1 | 0.0519 (7) | 0.0410 (6) | 0.0391 (6) | 0.0099 (5) | 0.0274 (5) | 0.0071 (5) |
N2 | 0.0484 (6) | 0.0338 (5) | 0.0396 (6) | 0.0118 (5) | 0.0278 (5) | 0.0057 (4) |
N3 | 0.0372 (5) | 0.0318 (5) | 0.0370 (5) | 0.0045 (4) | 0.0198 (4) | −0.0008 (4) |
N4 | 0.0427 (6) | 0.0411 (6) | 0.0521 (7) | 0.0027 (5) | 0.0257 (5) | −0.0070 (5) |
C1 | 0.0351 (6) | 0.0328 (6) | 0.0304 (6) | −0.0009 (5) | 0.0164 (5) | −0.0032 (4) |
C2 | 0.0353 (6) | 0.0327 (6) | 0.0349 (6) | 0.0026 (5) | 0.0178 (5) | 0.0007 (4) |
C3 | 0.0304 (6) | 0.0318 (6) | 0.0334 (6) | −0.0030 (4) | 0.0150 (5) | −0.0058 (4) |
C4 | 0.0397 (7) | 0.0393 (6) | 0.0385 (6) | 0.0015 (5) | 0.0208 (5) | 0.0015 (5) |
C5 | 0.0462 (7) | 0.0492 (7) | 0.0443 (7) | −0.0004 (6) | 0.0289 (6) | −0.0046 (6) |
C6 | 0.0427 (7) | 0.0369 (6) | 0.0363 (6) | 0.0018 (5) | 0.0206 (5) | −0.0003 (5) |
C7 | 0.0435 (7) | 0.0339 (6) | 0.0472 (7) | 0.0041 (5) | 0.0185 (6) | 0.0000 (5) |
O1W | 0.200 (3) | 0.0427 (9) | 0.1390 (19) | 0 | 0.142 (2) | 0 |
O1—C1 | 1.2399 (14) | C2—H2 | 0.93 |
N1—C1 | 1.3294 (16) | C3—C4 | 1.3870 (16) |
N1—H1NA | 0.854 (18) | C3—C6 | 1.3875 (17) |
N1—H1NB | 0.917 (19) | C4—C5 | 1.3789 (17) |
N2—C1 | 1.3639 (15) | C4—H4 | 0.93 |
N2—N3 | 1.3706 (13) | C5—H5 | 0.93 |
N2—H2N | 0.899 (17) | C6—C7 | 1.3789 (17) |
N3—C2 | 1.2752 (15) | C6—H6 | 0.93 |
N4—C5 | 1.3301 (18) | C7—H7 | 0.93 |
N4—C7 | 1.3366 (18) | O1W—H1WA | 0.874 (17) |
C2—C3 | 1.4616 (15) | ||
C1—N1—H1NA | 117.8 (12) | C4—C3—C2 | 119.22 (11) |
C1—N1—H1NB | 120.2 (10) | C6—C3—C2 | 123.34 (10) |
H1NA—N1—H1NB | 120.5 (16) | C5—C4—C3 | 119.20 (12) |
C1—N2—N3 | 119.97 (10) | C5—C4—H4 | 120.4 |
C1—N2—H2N | 118.8 (11) | C3—C4—H4 | 120.4 |
N3—N2—H2N | 120.3 (11) | N4—C5—C4 | 123.92 (12) |
C2—N3—N2 | 115.43 (10) | N4—C5—H5 | 118.0 |
C5—N4—C7 | 116.50 (11) | C4—C5—H5 | 118.0 |
O1—C1—N1 | 124.12 (11) | C7—C6—C3 | 119.07 (11) |
O1—C1—N2 | 118.79 (10) | C7—C6—H6 | 120.5 |
N1—C1—N2 | 117.08 (10) | C3—C6—H6 | 120.5 |
N3—C2—C3 | 121.72 (11) | N4—C7—C6 | 123.87 (12) |
N3—C2—H2 | 119.1 | N4—C7—H7 | 118.1 |
C3—C2—H2 | 119.1 | C6—C7—H7 | 118.1 |
C4—C3—C6 | 117.43 (11) | ||
C1—N2—N3—C2 | −174.35 (11) | C2—C3—C4—C5 | −179.38 (11) |
N3—N2—C1—O1 | 179.42 (10) | C7—N4—C5—C4 | 0.5 (2) |
N3—N2—C1—N1 | −1.82 (17) | C3—C4—C5—N4 | 0.4 (2) |
N2—N3—C2—C3 | −177.87 (10) | C4—C3—C6—C7 | 0.24 (17) |
N3—C2—C3—C4 | 176.79 (11) | C2—C3—C6—C7 | 178.81 (11) |
N3—C2—C3—C6 | −1.76 (18) | C5—N4—C7—C6 | −1.1 (2) |
C6—C3—C4—C5 | −0.74 (18) | C3—C6—C7—N4 | 0.7 (2) |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1NA···N3 | 0.852 (18) | 2.273 (18) | 2.6541 (16) | 107.3 (13) |
N1—H1NB···O1i | 0.917 (19) | 1.998 (18) | 2.9046 (15) | 169.3 (16) |
N2—H2N···O1ii | 0.898 (17) | 2.022 (17) | 2.9141 (14) | 171.9 (16) |
O1W—H1WA···N4 | 0.87 (3) | 2.08 (3) | 2.9373 (16) | 168 (3) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+3/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −x+3/2, −y−1/2, −z+1. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1NA···N3 | 0.852 (18) | 2.273 (18) | 2.6541 (16) | 107.3 (13) |
N1—H1NB···O1i | 0.917 (19) | 1.998 (18) | 2.9046 (15) | 169.3 (16) |
N2—H2N···O1ii | 0.898 (17) | 2.022 (17) | 2.9141 (14) | 171.9 (16) |
O1W—H1WA···N4 | 0.87 (3) | 2.08 (3) | 2.9373 (16) | 168 (3) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+3/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) −x+3/2, −y−1/2, −z+1. |
Acknowledgements
MHI, RAB and FSN thank CNPq for research fellowships. The diffractometer was supported by the Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP, CT Infra 03/2001).
References
Beraldo, H., Nacif, W. F. & West, D. X. (2001). Spectrochim. Acta Part A, 57, 1847–1854. CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bruker (2014). APEX2, SAINT, SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc , Madison, Wisconsin, USA Google Scholar
Bruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Kessler, M., Luo, J., Motherwell, W. D. S., Purkis, L. H., Smith, B. R., Taylor, R., Cooper, R. I., Harris, S. E. & Orpen, A. G. (2004). J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44, 2133–2144. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Crystal Impact (2014). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Garbelini, E. R., Hörner, M., Boneberger Behm, M., Evans, D. J. & Nunes, F. S. (2008). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 634, 1801–1806. CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Garbelini, E. R., Hörner, M., Giglio, V. F., da Silva, A. H., Barison, A. & Nunes, F. S. (2009). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 635, 1236–1241. CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Garbelini, E. R., Martin, M. da G. M., Back, D. F., Evans, D. J., Müller-Santos, M., Ribeiro, R. R., Lang, E. S. & Nunes, F. S. (2012). J. Mol. Struct. 1008, 35–41. CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Garbelini, E. R., Ribeiro, R. R., Horner, M., Locatelli, A. & Nunes, F. S. (2011). Spectrochim. Acta Part A, 78, 1337–1341. CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Restivo, R. & Palenik, G. J. (1970). Acta Cryst. B26, 1397–1402. CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Zhou, J., Liu, X., Chen, Z.-F. & Liang, H. (2006a). Hecheng Huaxue, 14, 471–475. CAS Google Scholar
Zhou, J., Liu, X., Li, D.-Q., Yuan, Y.-Z., Chen, Z.-F. & Zhang, Y. (2006b). Hecheng Huaxue, 14, 476–479. CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.