research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 71| Part 7| July 2015| Pages 816-820

Crystal structure of 4,4′-diethynylbiphen­yl

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aSchool of Fundamental Science, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia, and bDepartment of Chemistry, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand
*Correspondence e-mail: jsimpson@alkali.otago.ac.nz

Edited by P. C. Healy, Griffith University, Australia (Received 12 June 2015; accepted 14 June 2015; online 20 June 2015)

The title compound, C16H10, crystallizes with four unique mol­ecules, designated 1–4, in the asymmetric unit of the monoclinic unit cell. None of the mol­ecules is planar, with the benzene rings of mol­ecules 1–4 inclined to one another at angles of 42.41 (4), 24.07 (6), 42.59 (4) and 46.88 (4)°, respectively. In the crystal, weak C—H⋯π(ring) interactions, augmented by even weaker C≡C—H⋯π(alkyne) contacts, generate a three-dimensional network structure with inter­linked columns of mol­ecules formed along the c-axis direction.

1. Chemical context

Donor–acceptor (DA) dyads with the innate ability to generate long-lived charge separation in their excited states have elicited a great deal of current inter­est. Their applications cover fields ranging from artificial photosynthesis to solar cell technology (Rogozina et al., 2013[Rogozina, M. V., Ionkin, V. N. & Ivanov, A. I. (2013). J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 4564-4573.]; Fukuzumi et al., 2014[Fukuzumi, S., Ohkubo, K. & Suenobu, T. (2014). Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 1455-1464.]). We have produced a variety of such dyads based on ferrocene as the donor and with a variety of acceptors (see for example: Flood et al., 2007[Flood, A. H., McAdam, C. J., Gordon, K. C., Kjaergaard, H. G., Manning, A. R., Robinson, B. H. & Simpson, J. (2007). Polyhedron, 26, 448-455.]; Cuffe et al., 2005[Cuffe, L., Hudson, R. D. A., Gallagher, J., Jennings, S., McAdam, C. J., Connelly, R. B. T., Manning, A. R., Robinson, B. H. & Simpson, J. (2005). Organometallics, 24, 2051-2060.]; McAdam et al., 2003[McAdam, C. J., Morgan, J. L., Robinson, B. H., Simpson, J., Rieger, P. H. & Rieger, A. L. (2003). Organometallics, 22, 5126-5136.]). More recently, we have been inter­ested in expanding the range of donor–acceptor dyads by inter­polating a potentially conductive spacer between the donor and the acceptor to yield donor–spacer–acceptor (DSA) dyads. Biphenyl is a conductive spacer that we have used with some recent success, joined to a ferrocene donor through an alkene unit and to an acceptor via an alkyne link (McAdam et al., 2010[McAdam, C. J., Robinson, B. H., Simpson, J. & Tagg, T. (2010). Organometallics, 29, 2474-2483.]; Tagg et al., 2015[Tagg, T., Kjaergaard, H. G., Lane, J. R., McAdam, C. J., Robinson, B. H. & Simpson, J. (2015). Organometallics, 34, 2662-2666.]). We are inter­ested in further developing the chemistry of biphenyl as a potential spacer, with alkyne links to both the donor and the acceptor. Surprisingly, the mol­ecular and crystal structure of the precursor mol­ecule, 4,4′-diethynylbiphenyl (Liu, Liu et al., 2005[Liu, L., Liu, Z., Xu, W., Xu, H., Zhang, D. & Zhu, D. (2005). Tetrahedron, 61, 3813-3817.]), has not been previously studied and we report its structure here.

[Scheme 1]

2. Structural commentary

The title compound, (I)[link], crystallizes with four unique mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, identified by the leading digits 1–4 in the numbering schemes, Fig. 1[link]. Each mol­ecule comprises a central biphenyl ring system symmetrically substituted at the 4 and 4′ positions by terminal alkyne units. None of the mol­ecules is planar, with the two benzene rings of each mol­ecule inclined to one another at angles of 42.41 (4), 24.07 (6), 42.59 (4) and 46.88 (4)° for mol­ecules 1–4, respectively. Bond distances and angles in the biphenyl ring systems are not unusual and compare well, both inter­nally, over the four unique mol­ecules, and with those observed in related systems (see for example: O'Brien et al., 2010[O'Brien, Z. J., Karlen, S. D., Khan, S. & Garcia-Garibay, M. A. (2010). J. Org. Chem. 75, 2482-2491.], Butler et al., 2008[Butler, P., Manning, A. R., McAdam, C. J. & Simpson, J. (2008). J. Organomet. Chem. 693, 381-392.]; Muller, et al., 2006[Muller, T., Seichter, W. & Weber, E. (2006). New J. Chem. 30, 751-758.], Nitsche et al., 2003[Nitsche, S. I., Weber, E., Seichter, W., Bathori, N., Beketov, K. M. & Roewer, G. (2003). Silicon Chem. 2, 55-71.]). The Cn4—Cn7 and Cn4′—Cn7′ distances (n = 1–4) [mean 1.445 (2) Å] are generally somewhat long, enough indeed to raise alerts in the checkCIF procedure. However analysis in Vista (Groom & Allen, 2014[Groom, C. R. & Allen, F. H. (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 662-671.]) of comparable values for eight other biphenyl systems, with terminal alkyne functions in the 4-position, provides a mean value of 1.442 (16) Å, not at all dissimilar to the values observed here (see for example: Langley et al., 1998[Langley, P. J., Hulliger, J., Thaimattam, R. & Desiraju, G. R. (1998). New J. Chem. 22, 1307-1309.]; Mague et al., 1997[Mague, J. T., Foroozesh, M., Hopkins, N. E., Gan, L. L.-S. & Alworth, W. L. (1997). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 27, 183-189.]; McAdam et al., 2010[McAdam, C. J., Robinson, B. H., Simpson, J. & Tagg, T. (2010). Organometallics, 29, 2474-2483.]; Laliberté et al., 2006[Laliberté, D., Maris, T., Ryan, P. E. & Wuest, J. D. (2006). Cryst. Growth Des. 6, 1335-1340.]). The C≡C distances are also generally reasonable, with the exception of C27′—C28′, 1.130 (2) Å, which is unusually short compared to more typical C≡C distances of 1.181 (14) Å (Allen et al. 1987[Allen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1-19.]). There is no obvious explanation for this, except to note that the adjacent C27′—C24′ distance 1.4507 (19) Å is the longest of those reported here.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The asymmetric unit of (I)[link], showing the numbering schemes for the four unique mol­ecules designated as types 1–4 with the types discriminated by the leading characters in the atom labels.

3. Supra­molecular features

The absence of donor and acceptor components, to provide classical hydrogen bonding or even C—H⋯E (E = O, N, halogen) contacts, challenge the packing in this system. There has been considerable speculation on the factors influencing the formation of structures with Z′ > 1 (Desiraju, 2007[Desiraju, G. R. (2007). CrystEngComm, 9, 91-92.]; Steed & Steed, 2015[Steed, K. M. & Steed, J. W. (2015). Chem. Rev. 115, 2895-2933.]; Anderson & Steed 2007[Anderson, K. M. & Steed, J. W. (2007). CrystEngComm, 9, 328-330.], Nichol & Clegg, 2007[Nichol, G. S. & Clegg, W. (2007). CrystEngComm, 9, 959-960.]), and the nature, extent and degree of the inter­molecular contacts are clearly contributory factors. In this instance, the packing in the structure is profoundly influenced by an extensive series of weak edge-to-face C—H⋯π(ring) inter­actions (Table 1[link]) augmented by still weaker C≡C—H⋯π(alkyne) contacts. It is likely that the inherent weakness of these contacts may influence the adoption of a Z′ > 1 structure.

Table 1
C—H⋯π interactions (Å, °)

Cg1, Cg3, Cg4, Cg6 and Cg8 are the centroids of the C11–C16, C21–C26, C21′–C26′, C31′–C36′ and C41′–C46′ rings, respectively.

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C13—H13⋯Cg6i 0.95 2.73 3.4910 (13) 137
C15—H15⋯Cg6 0.95 2.70 3.4782 (13) 140
C16′—H16′⋯Cg1ii 0.95 2.92 3.5375 (12) 124
C23—H23⋯Cg8i 0.95 2.71 3.4809 (13) 139
C25—H25⋯Cg8 0.95 2.76 3.4976 (14) 136
C33′—H33′⋯Cg4iii 0.95 2.88 3.6153 (13) 135
C36—H36⋯Cg3iii 0.95 2.87 3.6112 (12) 135
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z-1; (ii) -x+1, -y+1, -z+1; (iii) x, y, z+1.

A complementary set of C—H⋯π contacts, involving in one case mol­ecules 1 and 3 and in the second mol­ecules 2 and 4, sandwiches a mol­ecule of 1 between two mol­ecules of 3 and a mol­ecule of 2 between two mol­ecules of 4. These contacts generate infinite chains approximately along the c-axis direction. The two chains lie approximately orthogonal to one another, Fig. 2[link]. Weak C16′—H16′⋯Cg1 contacts form inversion dimers between two adjacent 1 mol­ecules, Fig. 3[link], and dimers also result from C—H⋯π contacts involving both rings of adjacent 2 and 3 mol­ecules, Fig. 4[link]; both these sets of contacts contribute to the overall packing. In addition to these C—H⋯π(ring) inter­actions, one further set of somewhat unusual contacts is formed, again involving all four mol­ecules in the structure. These are weak C≡C—H⋯π(alkyne) contacts (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999[Desiraju, G. R. & Steiner, T. (1999). The Weak Hydrogen Bond in Structural Chemistry and Biology, pp 169-175. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.]) involving the relatively acidic C—H donors of the alkyne substituents. These again involve pairs of mol­ecules with C18—H18⋯C37≡C38 and C38′—H38′⋯C17′≡C18′ contacts generating one set of zigzag chains along b with an adjacent and complementary zigzag produced by C28—H28⋯C47≡C48 and C48′—H48′⋯C27′≡C28′ inter­actions, These chains generate layers of mol­ecules in the ac plane, Fig. 5[link]. The contacts display the classic T shape, found also in the neutron structure of acetyl­ene (McMullan et al., 1992[McMullan, R. K., Kvick, Å. & Popelier, P. (1992). Acta Cryst. B48, 726-731.]), but not perfectly so. The Hn8⋯Cn7 distances are consistently slightly shorter [mean of the four distances = 2.77 (3) Å] than the Hn8⋯Cn8 equivalents [mean 2.97 (4) Å]. The mean Hn8⋯C≡C centroid distance is 2.82 (4) Å and these values all fall well within projected ranges for such contacts (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999[Desiraju, G. R. & Steiner, T. (1999). The Weak Hydrogen Bond in Structural Chemistry and Biology, pp 169-175. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.]). The overall effect of this plethora of weak inter­actions is to stack mol­ecules into `multiple-decker sandwich' columns, linked together along the c-axis direction, Fig. 6[link].

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Complementary chains of 1, 3 and 2, 4 mol­ecules extending along the c-axis direction. In this and subsequent figures, C—H⋯π(ring) contacts are drawn as dotted lines with ring centroids shown as coloured spheres.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Inversion dimers formed through C—H⋯π(ring) contacts between mol­ecules of type 1.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Dimers formed through C—H⋯π(ring) contacts between mol­ecules of types 2 and 4.
[Figure 5]
Figure 5
Zigzag chains of mol­ecules generated by C—H⋯C≡C contacts between mol­ecules of types 1 and 3 and mol­ecules of types 2 and 4. The centroids of the C≡C bonds are drawn as coloured spheres and the C—H⋯C≡C contacts are shown as dotted lines.
[Figure 6]
Figure 6
Overall packing for (I[link]) viewed along the c axis. Representative C—H⋯π(ring) and C—H⋯π(alkyne) contacts are drawn as dotted lines.

4. Database survey

Structures of 4-4′-disubstituted bi­phenyls abound with 2891 hits on the CSD (Groom & Allen, 2014[Groom, C. R. & Allen, F. H. (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 662-671.]). However, those with 4,4′-alkyne substituents are far less plentiful with only 29 entries. These fall into two distinct categories. First compounds with one or both of the alkyne substituents on the bi­phenyls bound to carbon or silicon atoms, 14 entries (see for example: Zhou et al., 2012[Zhou, H., Maris, T. & Wuest, J. D. (2012). J. Phys. Chem. C, 116, 13052-13062.]; McAdam et al., 2010[McAdam, C. J., Robinson, B. H., Simpson, J. & Tagg, T. (2010). Organometallics, 29, 2474-2483.]; O'Brien et al., 2010[O'Brien, Z. J., Karlen, S. D., Khan, S. & Garcia-Garibay, M. A. (2010). J. Org. Chem. 75, 2482-2491.], Zeng et al., 2007[Zeng, X., Wang, C., Bryce, M. R., Batsanov, A. S., Sirichantaropass, S., García-Suárez, V. M., Lambert, C. J. & Sage, I. (2007). Eur. J. Org. Chem. pp. 5244-5249.]; Muller, et al., 2006[Muller, T., Seichter, W. & Weber, E. (2006). New J. Chem. 30, 751-758.]; Nitsche et al., 2003[Nitsche, S. I., Weber, E., Seichter, W., Bathori, N., Beketov, K. M. & Roewer, G. (2003). Silicon Chem. 2, 55-71.]). Second, the well represented class of organometallic acetyl­ides, also referred to as ethynyl compounds. These have either the terminal hydrogen atoms of the alkyne groups both replaced by a transition metal complex moiety (see for example: Shanmugaraju et al., 2011[Shanmugaraju, S., Joshi, S. A. & Mukherjee, P. S. (2011). Inorg. Chem. 50, 11736-11745.]; Gao et al., 2007[Gao, L.-B., Kan, J., Fan, Y., Zhang, L.-Y., Liu, S.-H. & Chen, Z.-N. (2007). Inorg. Chem. 46, 5651-5664.]; Ibn Ghazala et al., 2006[Ibn Ghazala, S., Paul, F., Toupet, L., Roisnel, T., Hapiot, P. & Lapinte, C. (2006). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 2463-2476.]; Liu, Poon et al., 2005[Liu, L., Poon, S.-Y. & Wong, W.-Y. (2005). J. Organomet. Chem. 690, 5036-5048.]) or, much less frequently, only a single terminal hydrogen atom is replaced to afford ethynyl complexes with terminal C≡C–H substituents (Zeng et al., 2013[Zeng, L.-Z., Wu, Y.-Y., Tian, G.-X. & Li, Z. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, m607.]; Saha et al., 2005[Saha, R., Qaium, M. A., Debnath, D., Younus, M., Chawdhury, N., Sultana, N., Kociok-Köhn, G., Ooi, L., Raithby, P. R. & Kijima, M. (2005). Dalton Trans. pp. 2760-2765.]).

5. Synthesis and crystallization

The title compound (I)[link] was prepared by a literature procedure (Liu, Liu et al., 2005[Liu, L., Liu, Z., Xu, W., Xu, H., Zhang, D. & Zhu, D. (2005). Tetrahedron, 61, 3813-3817.]) and recrystallized from di­chloro­methane/hexane (1:1) to give pale-yellow plates suitable for X-ray analysis.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2[link]. All hydrogen atoms were refined using a riding model with d(C—H) = 0.95 Å, Uiso = 1.2Ueq(C) for both the aromatic and terminal alkyne H atoms. Two low angle reflections with Fo << Fc, with intensities likely to have been attenuated by the beam-stop, were removed for the final refinement cycles.

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula C16H10
Mr 202.24
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K) 85
a, b, c (Å) 23.4263 (5), 21.1181 (5), 9.2989 (2)
β (°) 100.731 (1)
V3) 4519.89 (17)
Z 16
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.07
Crystal size (mm) 0.46 × 0.40 × 0.07
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker–Nonius APEXII CCD
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2011[Bruker (2011). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.])
Tmin, Tmax 0.887, 0.980
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 77658, 8885, 7147
Rint 0.030
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.617
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.036, 0.103, 1.03
No. of reflections 8885
No. of parameters 577
No. of restraints 42
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.29, −0.16
Computer programs: , APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2011[Bruker (2011). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]), SHELXS (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3-8.]), TITAN2000 (Hunter & Simpson, 1999[Hunter, K. A. & Simpson, J. (1999). TITAN2000. University of Otago, New Zealand.]), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008[Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466-470.]), enCIFer (Allen et al., 2004[Allen, F. H., Johnson, O., Shields, G. P., Smith, B. R. & Towler, M. (2004). J. Appl. Cryst. 37, 335-338.]), PLATON (Spek, 2009[Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148-155.]) and publCIF (Westrip 2010[Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.]).

Supporting information


Chemical context top

Donor–acceptor (DA) dyads with the innate ability to generate long-lived charge separation in their excited states have elicited a great deal of current inter­est. Their applications cover fields ranging from artificial photosynthesis to solar cell technology (Rogozina et al., 2013; Fukuzumi et al., 2014). We have produced a variety of such dyads based on ferrocene as the donor and with a variety of acceptors (see for example: Flood et al., 2007; Cuffe et al., 2005; McAdam et al., 2003). More recently, we have been inter­ested in expanding the range of donor–acceptor dyads by inter­polating a potentially conductive spacer between the donor and the acceptor to yield donor–spacer–acceptor (DS–A) dyads. Bi­phenyl is a conductive spacer that we have used with some recent success, joined to a ferrocene donor through an alkene unit and to an acceptor via an alkyne link (McAdam et al., 2010; Tagg et al., 2015). We are inter­ested in further developing the chemistry of bi­phenyl as a potential spacer, with alkyne links to both the donor and the acceptor. Surprisingly, the molecular and crystal structure of the precursor molecule, 4,4'-diethynylbi­phenyl (Liu, Liu et al., 2005), has not been previously studied and we report its structure here.

Structural commentary top

The title compound, C16H10, (I), crystallizes with four unique molecules in the asymmetric unit, identified by the leading digits 1–4 in the numbering schemes, Fig. 1. Each molecule comprises a central bi­phenyl ring system symmetrically substituted at the 4 and 4' positions by terminal alkyne units. None of the molecules is planar, with the two benzene rings of each molecule inclined to one another at angles of 42.41 (4), 24.07 (6), 42.59 (4) and 46.88 (4)° for molecules 1–4, respectively. Bond distances and angles in the bi­phenyl ring systems are not unusual and compare well, both inter­nally, over the four unique molecules, and with those observed in related systems (see for example: O'Brien et al., 2010, Butler et al., 2008; Muller, et al., 2006, Nitsche et al., 2003). The Cn4—Cn7 and Cn4'—Cn7' distances (n = 1–4) [mean 1.445 (2) Å] are generally somewhat long, enough indeed to raise alerts in the checkCIF procedure. However analysis in Vista (Groom & Allen, 2014) of comparable values for eight other bi­phenyl systems, with terminal alkyne functions in the 4-position, provides a mean value of 1.442 (16) Å, not at all dissimilar to the values observed here (see for example: Langley et al., 1998; Mague et al., 1997; McAdam et al., 2010; Laliberté et al., 2006). The CC distances are also generally reasonable, with the exception of C27'—C28', 1.130 (2) Å, which is unusually short compared to more typical CC distances of 1.181 (14) Å (Allen et al. 1987). There is no obvious explanation for this, except to note that the adjacent C27'—C24' distance 1.4507 (19) Å is the longest of those reported here.

Supra­molecular features top

The absence of donor and acceptor components, to provide classical hydrogen bonding or even C—H···E (E = O, N, halogen) contacts, challenge the packing in this system. There has been considerable speculation on the factors influencing the formation of structures with Z' > 1 (Desiraju, 2007; Steed & Steed, 2015; Anderson & Steed 2007, Nichol & Clegg, 2007), and the nature, extent and degree of the inter­molecular contacts are clearly a contributory factors. In this instance, the packing in the structure is profoundly influenced by an extensive series of weak edge-to-face C—H···π(ring) inter­actions (Table 1) augmented by still weaker C C—H···π(alkyne) contacts. It is likely that the inherent weakness of these contacts may influence the adoption of a Z' > 1 structure.

A complementary set of C—H···π contacts, involving in one case molecules 1 and 3 and in the second molecules 2 and 4, sandwiches a molecule of 1 between two molecules of 3 and a molecule of 2 between two molecules of 4. These contacts generate infinite chains approximately along the c-axis direction. The two chains lie approximately orthogonal to one another, Fig. 2. Weak C16'—H16'···Cg1 contacts form inversion dimers between two adjacent 1 molecules, Fig. 3, and dimers also result from C—H···π contacts involving both rings of adjacent 2 and 3 molecules, Fig. 4; both these sets of contacts contribute to the overall packing. In addition to these C—H···π(ring) inter­actions, one further set of somewhat unusual contacts is formed, again involving all four molecules in the structure. These are weak CC—H···π(alkyne) contacts (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999) involving the relatively acidic C—H donors of the alkyne substituents. These again involve pairs of molecules with C18—H18···C37C38 and C38'—H38'···C17' C18' contacts generating one set of zigzag chains along b with an adjacent and complementary zigzag produced by C28—H28···C47C48 and C48'—H48'···C27'C28' inter­actions, These chains generate layers of molecules in the ac plane, Fig. 5. The contacts display the classic T shape, found also in the neutron structure of acetyl­ene (McMullan et al., 1992), but not perfectly so. The Hn8···Cn7 distances are consistently slightly shorter [mean of the four distances = 2.77 (3) Å] than the Hn8···Cn8 equivalents [mean 2.97 (4) Å]. The mean Hn8···CC centroid distance is 2.82 (4) Å and these values all fall well within projected ranges for such contacts (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999). The overall effect of this plethora of weak inter­actions is to stack molecules into `multiple-decker sandwich' columns, linked together along the c-axis direction, Fig. 6.

Database survey top

Structures of 4-4'-disubstituted bi­phenyls abound with 2891 hits on the CSD (Groom & Allen, 2014). However, those with 4,4'-alkyne substituents are far less plentiful with only 29 entries. These fall into two distinct categories. First compounds with one or both of the alkyne substituents on the bi­phenyls bound to carbon or silicon atoms, 14 entries (see for example: Zhou et al., 2012; McAdam et al., 2010; O'Brien et al., 2010, Zeng et al., 2007; Muller, et al., 2006; Nitsche et al., 2003). Second, the well represented class of organometallic acetyl­ides, also referred to as ethynyl compounds. These have either the terminal hydrogen atoms of the alkyne groups both replaced by a transition metal complex moiety (see for example: Shanmugaraju et al., 2011; Gao et al., 2007; Ibn Ghazala et al., 2006; Liu, Poon et al., 2005) or, much less frequently, only a single terminal hydrogen atom is replaced to afford ethynyl complexes with terminal CC–H substituents (Zeng et al., 2013; Saha et al., 2005).

Synthesis and crystallization top

The title compound (I) was prepared by a literature procedure (Liu, Liu et al., 2005) and recrystallized from di­chloro­methane/hexane (1:1) to give pale-yellow plates suitable for X-ray analysis.

Refinement top

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. All hydrogen atoms were refined using a riding model with d(C—H) = 0.95 Å, Uiso = 1.2Ueq(C) for both the aromatic and terminal alkyne H atoms. Two low angle reflections with Fo << Fc, with intensities likely to have been attenuated by the beam-stop, were removed for the final refinement cycles.

Related literature top

For related literature, see: Allen et al. (1987); Anderson & Steed (2007); Butler et al. (2008); Cuffe et al. (2005); Desiraju (2007); Desiraju & Steiner (1999); Flood et al. (2007); Fukuzumi et al. (2014); Gao et al. (2007); Ghazala et al. (2006); Groom & Allen (2014); Laliberté et al. (2006); Langley et al. (1998); Liu, Liu, Xu, Xu, Zhang & Zhu (2005); Liu, Poon & Wong (2005); Mague et al. (1997); McAdam et al. (2003, 2010); McMullan et al. (1992); Muller et al. (2006); Nichol & Clegg (2007); Nitsche et al. (2003); O'Brien et al. (2010); Rogozina et al. (2013); Saha et al. (2005); Shanmugaraju et al. (2011); Steed & Steed (2015); Tagg et al. (2015); Zeng et al. (2007, 2013); Zhou et al. (2012).

Structure description top

Donor–acceptor (DA) dyads with the innate ability to generate long-lived charge separation in their excited states have elicited a great deal of current inter­est. Their applications cover fields ranging from artificial photosynthesis to solar cell technology (Rogozina et al., 2013; Fukuzumi et al., 2014). We have produced a variety of such dyads based on ferrocene as the donor and with a variety of acceptors (see for example: Flood et al., 2007; Cuffe et al., 2005; McAdam et al., 2003). More recently, we have been inter­ested in expanding the range of donor–acceptor dyads by inter­polating a potentially conductive spacer between the donor and the acceptor to yield donor–spacer–acceptor (DS–A) dyads. Bi­phenyl is a conductive spacer that we have used with some recent success, joined to a ferrocene donor through an alkene unit and to an acceptor via an alkyne link (McAdam et al., 2010; Tagg et al., 2015). We are inter­ested in further developing the chemistry of bi­phenyl as a potential spacer, with alkyne links to both the donor and the acceptor. Surprisingly, the molecular and crystal structure of the precursor molecule, 4,4'-diethynylbi­phenyl (Liu, Liu et al., 2005), has not been previously studied and we report its structure here.

The title compound, C16H10, (I), crystallizes with four unique molecules in the asymmetric unit, identified by the leading digits 1–4 in the numbering schemes, Fig. 1. Each molecule comprises a central bi­phenyl ring system symmetrically substituted at the 4 and 4' positions by terminal alkyne units. None of the molecules is planar, with the two benzene rings of each molecule inclined to one another at angles of 42.41 (4), 24.07 (6), 42.59 (4) and 46.88 (4)° for molecules 1–4, respectively. Bond distances and angles in the bi­phenyl ring systems are not unusual and compare well, both inter­nally, over the four unique molecules, and with those observed in related systems (see for example: O'Brien et al., 2010, Butler et al., 2008; Muller, et al., 2006, Nitsche et al., 2003). The Cn4—Cn7 and Cn4'—Cn7' distances (n = 1–4) [mean 1.445 (2) Å] are generally somewhat long, enough indeed to raise alerts in the checkCIF procedure. However analysis in Vista (Groom & Allen, 2014) of comparable values for eight other bi­phenyl systems, with terminal alkyne functions in the 4-position, provides a mean value of 1.442 (16) Å, not at all dissimilar to the values observed here (see for example: Langley et al., 1998; Mague et al., 1997; McAdam et al., 2010; Laliberté et al., 2006). The CC distances are also generally reasonable, with the exception of C27'—C28', 1.130 (2) Å, which is unusually short compared to more typical CC distances of 1.181 (14) Å (Allen et al. 1987). There is no obvious explanation for this, except to note that the adjacent C27'—C24' distance 1.4507 (19) Å is the longest of those reported here.

The absence of donor and acceptor components, to provide classical hydrogen bonding or even C—H···E (E = O, N, halogen) contacts, challenge the packing in this system. There has been considerable speculation on the factors influencing the formation of structures with Z' > 1 (Desiraju, 2007; Steed & Steed, 2015; Anderson & Steed 2007, Nichol & Clegg, 2007), and the nature, extent and degree of the inter­molecular contacts are clearly a contributory factors. In this instance, the packing in the structure is profoundly influenced by an extensive series of weak edge-to-face C—H···π(ring) inter­actions (Table 1) augmented by still weaker C C—H···π(alkyne) contacts. It is likely that the inherent weakness of these contacts may influence the adoption of a Z' > 1 structure.

A complementary set of C—H···π contacts, involving in one case molecules 1 and 3 and in the second molecules 2 and 4, sandwiches a molecule of 1 between two molecules of 3 and a molecule of 2 between two molecules of 4. These contacts generate infinite chains approximately along the c-axis direction. The two chains lie approximately orthogonal to one another, Fig. 2. Weak C16'—H16'···Cg1 contacts form inversion dimers between two adjacent 1 molecules, Fig. 3, and dimers also result from C—H···π contacts involving both rings of adjacent 2 and 3 molecules, Fig. 4; both these sets of contacts contribute to the overall packing. In addition to these C—H···π(ring) inter­actions, one further set of somewhat unusual contacts is formed, again involving all four molecules in the structure. These are weak CC—H···π(alkyne) contacts (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999) involving the relatively acidic C—H donors of the alkyne substituents. These again involve pairs of molecules with C18—H18···C37C38 and C38'—H38'···C17' C18' contacts generating one set of zigzag chains along b with an adjacent and complementary zigzag produced by C28—H28···C47C48 and C48'—H48'···C27'C28' inter­actions, These chains generate layers of molecules in the ac plane, Fig. 5. The contacts display the classic T shape, found also in the neutron structure of acetyl­ene (McMullan et al., 1992), but not perfectly so. The Hn8···Cn7 distances are consistently slightly shorter [mean of the four distances = 2.77 (3) Å] than the Hn8···Cn8 equivalents [mean 2.97 (4) Å]. The mean Hn8···CC centroid distance is 2.82 (4) Å and these values all fall well within projected ranges for such contacts (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999). The overall effect of this plethora of weak inter­actions is to stack molecules into `multiple-decker sandwich' columns, linked together along the c-axis direction, Fig. 6.

Structures of 4-4'-disubstituted bi­phenyls abound with 2891 hits on the CSD (Groom & Allen, 2014). However, those with 4,4'-alkyne substituents are far less plentiful with only 29 entries. These fall into two distinct categories. First compounds with one or both of the alkyne substituents on the bi­phenyls bound to carbon or silicon atoms, 14 entries (see for example: Zhou et al., 2012; McAdam et al., 2010; O'Brien et al., 2010, Zeng et al., 2007; Muller, et al., 2006; Nitsche et al., 2003). Second, the well represented class of organometallic acetyl­ides, also referred to as ethynyl compounds. These have either the terminal hydrogen atoms of the alkyne groups both replaced by a transition metal complex moiety (see for example: Shanmugaraju et al., 2011; Gao et al., 2007; Ibn Ghazala et al., 2006; Liu, Poon et al., 2005) or, much less frequently, only a single terminal hydrogen atom is replaced to afford ethynyl complexes with terminal CC–H substituents (Zeng et al., 2013; Saha et al., 2005).

For related literature, see: Allen et al. (1987); Anderson & Steed (2007); Butler et al. (2008); Cuffe et al. (2005); Desiraju (2007); Desiraju & Steiner (1999); Flood et al. (2007); Fukuzumi et al. (2014); Gao et al. (2007); Ghazala et al. (2006); Groom & Allen (2014); Laliberté et al. (2006); Langley et al. (1998); Liu, Liu, Xu, Xu, Zhang & Zhu (2005); Liu, Poon & Wong (2005); Mague et al. (1997); McAdam et al. (2003, 2010); McMullan et al. (1992); Muller et al. (2006); Nichol & Clegg (2007); Nitsche et al. (2003); O'Brien et al. (2010); Rogozina et al. (2013); Saha et al. (2005); Shanmugaraju et al. (2011); Steed & Steed (2015); Tagg et al. (2015); Zeng et al. (2007, 2013); Zhou et al. (2012).

Synthesis and crystallization top

The title compound (I) was prepared by a literature procedure (Liu, Liu et al., 2005) and recrystallized from di­chloro­methane/hexane (1:1) to give pale-yellow plates suitable for X-ray analysis.

Refinement details top

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. All hydrogen atoms were refined using a riding model with d(C—H) = 0.95 Å, Uiso = 1.2Ueq(C) for both the aromatic and terminal alkyne H atoms. Two low angle reflections with Fo << Fc, with intensities likely to have been attenuated by the beam-stop, were removed for the final refinement cycles.

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2011); cell refinement: APEX2 (Bruker, 2011) and SAINT (Bruker, 2011); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2011); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015) and TITAN2000 (Hunter & Simpson, 1999); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), enCIFer (Allen et al., 2004), PLATON (Spek, 2009) and publCIF (Westrip 2010).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. The asymmetric unit of (I), showing the numbering schemes for the four unique molecules designated as types 1–4 with the types discriminated by the leading characters in the atom labels.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Complementary chains of 1, 3 and 2, 4 molecules extending along the c-axis direction. In this and subsequent figures, C—H···π(ring) contacts are drawn as dotted lines with ring centroids shown as coloured spheres.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Inversion dimers formed through C—H···π(ring) contacts between molecules of type 1.
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. Dimers formed through C—H···π(ring) contacts between molecules of types 2 and 4.
[Figure 5] Fig. 5. Zigzag chains of molecules generated by C—H···CC contacts between molecules of types 1 and 3 and molecules of types 2 and 4. The centroids of the CC bonds are drawn as coloured spheres and the C—H···CC contacts are shown as dotted lines.
[Figure 6] Fig. 6. Overall packing for (II) viewed along b. Representative C—H···π(ring) and C—H···π(alkyne) contacts are drawn as dotted lines.
4,4'-Diethynylbiphenyl top
Crystal data top
C16H10F(000) = 1696
Mr = 202.24Dx = 1.189 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 23.4263 (5) ÅCell parameters from 8416 reflections
b = 21.1181 (5) Åθ = 4.9–62.5°
c = 9.2989 (2) ŵ = 0.07 mm1
β = 100.731 (1)°T = 85 K
V = 4519.89 (17) Å3Plate, pale yellow
Z = 160.46 × 0.40 × 0.07 mm
Data collection top
Bruker–Nonius APEXII CCD
diffractometer
8885 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube7147 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.030
φ and ω scansθmax = 26.0°, θmin = 1.3°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2011)
h = 2828
Tmin = 0.887, Tmax = 0.980k = 2626
77658 measured reflectionsl = 1111
Refinement top
Refinement on F242 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.036H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.103 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0471P)2 + 1.454P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.03(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
8885 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.29 e Å3
577 parametersΔρmin = 0.16 e Å3
Crystal data top
C16H10V = 4519.89 (17) Å3
Mr = 202.24Z = 16
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation
a = 23.4263 (5) ŵ = 0.07 mm1
b = 21.1181 (5) ÅT = 85 K
c = 9.2989 (2) Å0.46 × 0.40 × 0.07 mm
β = 100.731 (1)°
Data collection top
Bruker–Nonius APEXII CCD
diffractometer
8885 independent reflections
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2011)
7147 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Tmin = 0.887, Tmax = 0.980Rint = 0.030
77658 measured reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.03642 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.103H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03Δρmax = 0.29 e Å3
8885 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.16 e Å3
577 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Two low angle reflections with Fo << Fc with intensities affected by the beam-stop were removed for the final refinement cycles.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C180.26084 (6)0.61801 (6)0.27932 (15)0.0318 (3)
H180.22980.64770.26630.038*
C170.29917 (5)0.58137 (6)0.29541 (13)0.0240 (3)
C160.40471 (6)0.45861 (6)0.46859 (13)0.0252 (3)
H160.41520.43810.56060.030*
C150.36119 (5)0.50352 (6)0.44947 (13)0.0253 (3)
H150.34170.51300.52780.030*
C140.34553 (5)0.53520 (5)0.31607 (13)0.0206 (2)
C130.37510 (5)0.52063 (6)0.20294 (13)0.0226 (3)
H130.36570.54230.11210.027*
C120.41799 (5)0.47484 (6)0.22237 (12)0.0221 (2)
H120.43720.46500.14380.027*
C110.43363 (5)0.44272 (5)0.35501 (12)0.0196 (2)
C11'0.47811 (5)0.39198 (5)0.37373 (12)0.0197 (2)
C12'0.47908 (5)0.34774 (5)0.26198 (12)0.0214 (2)
H12'0.45160.35110.17320.026*
C13'0.51937 (5)0.29931 (6)0.27899 (13)0.0229 (3)
H13'0.51920.26960.20230.027*
C15'0.56013 (5)0.33806 (5)0.52006 (13)0.0231 (3)
H15'0.58800.33510.60820.028*
C16'0.51939 (5)0.38625 (5)0.50273 (12)0.0222 (2)
H16'0.51950.41590.57960.027*
C14'0.56056 (5)0.29371 (5)0.40853 (13)0.0212 (2)
C17'0.60326 (5)0.24352 (6)0.42461 (13)0.0242 (3)
C18'0.63815 (6)0.20297 (6)0.43483 (14)0.0294 (3)
H18'0.66630.17020.44310.035*
C280.01222 (6)0.61620 (7)0.10611 (15)0.0359 (3)
H280.01890.64570.12430.043*
C270.05092 (6)0.57953 (6)0.08355 (14)0.0277 (3)
C240.09698 (5)0.53344 (6)0.05973 (13)0.0231 (3)
C250.12721 (6)0.51937 (6)0.08080 (14)0.0292 (3)
H250.11840.54170.16260.035*
C260.16983 (6)0.47332 (6)0.10195 (13)0.0280 (3)
H260.19010.46470.19830.034*
C230.11208 (5)0.50095 (6)0.17817 (13)0.0227 (3)
H230.09310.51090.27500.027*
C220.15419 (5)0.45468 (5)0.15572 (13)0.0217 (2)
H220.16340.43270.23770.026*
C210.18383 (5)0.43917 (5)0.01531 (13)0.0212 (2)
C21'0.22840 (5)0.38863 (5)0.00710 (13)0.0219 (2)
C22'0.22770 (5)0.33988 (6)0.09553 (13)0.0247 (3)
H22'0.19770.33900.17980.030*
C23'0.26965 (5)0.29318 (6)0.07676 (14)0.0278 (3)
H23'0.26860.26100.14860.033*
C25'0.31418 (5)0.34058 (6)0.15210 (14)0.0269 (3)
H25'0.34330.34050.23810.032*
C26'0.27264 (5)0.38763 (6)0.13152 (13)0.0240 (3)
H26'0.27400.42000.20300.029*
C24'0.31377 (5)0.29291 (6)0.04756 (14)0.0270 (3)
C27'0.35848 (6)0.24449 (7)0.06802 (16)0.0352 (3)
C28'0.39403 (7)0.20760 (7)0.08536 (18)0.0447 (4)
H28'0.42390.17660.09990.054*
C380.11161 (6)0.79841 (6)0.69494 (16)0.0334 (3)
H380.08280.83060.67710.040*
C370.14702 (5)0.75884 (6)0.71693 (14)0.0274 (3)
C340.19066 (5)0.70967 (5)0.74066 (13)0.0231 (3)
C350.18803 (5)0.66086 (6)0.84074 (13)0.0240 (3)
H350.15770.66050.89580.029*
C360.22913 (5)0.61314 (5)0.86027 (13)0.0218 (2)
H360.22650.58000.92770.026*
C330.23589 (5)0.70960 (6)0.66094 (13)0.0250 (3)
H330.23810.74230.59200.030*
C320.27727 (5)0.66226 (6)0.68221 (13)0.0229 (3)
H320.30800.66310.62850.027*
C310.27464 (5)0.61318 (5)0.78158 (12)0.0199 (2)
C31'0.31938 (5)0.56270 (5)0.80312 (12)0.0192 (2)
C32'0.30445 (5)0.49923 (5)0.81532 (12)0.0209 (2)
H32'0.26480.48810.81050.025*
C33'0.34629 (5)0.45206 (6)0.83436 (12)0.0220 (2)
H33'0.33520.40910.84160.026*
C35'0.41999 (5)0.53127 (6)0.83133 (12)0.0225 (2)
H35'0.45970.54240.83750.027*
C36'0.37810 (5)0.57790 (6)0.81118 (12)0.0211 (2)
H36'0.38920.62080.80270.025*
C34'0.40476 (5)0.46768 (6)0.84285 (12)0.0206 (2)
C37'0.44936 (5)0.41951 (6)0.86414 (12)0.0237 (3)
C38'0.48707 (6)0.38135 (6)0.88180 (14)0.0302 (3)
H38'0.51730.35070.89600.036*
C480.13344 (6)0.79702 (7)0.30586 (17)0.0402 (3)
H480.16210.82920.28580.048*
C470.09783 (6)0.75706 (6)0.33069 (15)0.0324 (3)
C440.05457 (5)0.70779 (6)0.35722 (14)0.0272 (3)
C450.05343 (5)0.66035 (6)0.25252 (14)0.0264 (3)
H450.08110.66100.16370.032*
C460.01241 (5)0.61263 (6)0.27733 (13)0.0241 (3)
H460.01270.58040.20600.029*
C430.01289 (6)0.70624 (6)0.48626 (15)0.0297 (3)
H430.01320.73790.55860.036*
C420.02873 (5)0.65901 (6)0.50944 (14)0.0270 (3)
H420.05720.65910.59680.032*
C410.02949 (5)0.61109 (6)0.40583 (13)0.0229 (3)
C41'0.07433 (5)0.56078 (6)0.42969 (12)0.0219 (2)
C42'0.13294 (5)0.57601 (6)0.47849 (13)0.0232 (3)
H42'0.14390.61890.49830.028*
C43'0.17498 (5)0.52946 (6)0.49820 (13)0.0243 (3)
H43'0.21460.54070.52930.029*
C45'0.10123 (5)0.45009 (6)0.42502 (13)0.0246 (3)
H45'0.09020.40710.40810.030*
C46'0.05956 (5)0.49710 (6)0.40248 (13)0.0238 (3)
H46'0.02010.48600.36780.029*
C44'0.15977 (5)0.46576 (6)0.47284 (12)0.0235 (3)
C47'0.20428 (5)0.41762 (6)0.49536 (13)0.0273 (3)
C48'0.24191 (6)0.37986 (7)0.51539 (15)0.0350 (3)
H48'0.27230.34940.53160.042*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C180.0334 (7)0.0309 (7)0.0326 (7)0.0041 (6)0.0103 (6)0.0050 (6)
C170.0262 (6)0.0268 (6)0.0198 (6)0.0057 (5)0.0062 (5)0.0005 (5)
C160.0370 (7)0.0220 (6)0.0173 (6)0.0024 (5)0.0065 (5)0.0022 (5)
C150.0341 (7)0.0238 (6)0.0201 (6)0.0014 (5)0.0105 (5)0.0016 (5)
C140.0213 (6)0.0183 (5)0.0217 (6)0.0030 (4)0.0029 (5)0.0019 (4)
C130.0224 (6)0.0276 (6)0.0167 (6)0.0015 (5)0.0011 (4)0.0023 (5)
C120.0215 (6)0.0288 (6)0.0165 (6)0.0005 (5)0.0049 (4)0.0005 (5)
C110.0216 (6)0.0191 (6)0.0175 (6)0.0044 (5)0.0027 (4)0.0024 (4)
C11'0.0213 (6)0.0200 (6)0.0186 (6)0.0041 (5)0.0056 (4)0.0019 (4)
C12'0.0213 (6)0.0251 (6)0.0173 (6)0.0016 (5)0.0023 (4)0.0001 (5)
C13'0.0251 (6)0.0231 (6)0.0212 (6)0.0023 (5)0.0062 (5)0.0031 (5)
C15'0.0248 (6)0.0234 (6)0.0196 (6)0.0051 (5)0.0001 (5)0.0040 (5)
C16'0.0282 (6)0.0212 (6)0.0171 (6)0.0036 (5)0.0035 (5)0.0008 (4)
C14'0.0205 (6)0.0199 (6)0.0238 (6)0.0033 (5)0.0055 (5)0.0040 (5)
C17'0.0251 (6)0.0244 (6)0.0235 (6)0.0072 (5)0.0057 (5)0.0016 (5)
C18'0.0274 (7)0.0271 (7)0.0332 (7)0.0001 (6)0.0040 (5)0.0067 (5)
C280.0371 (8)0.0381 (8)0.0313 (7)0.0090 (6)0.0027 (6)0.0049 (6)
C270.0301 (7)0.0304 (7)0.0230 (6)0.0038 (6)0.0059 (5)0.0044 (5)
C240.0226 (6)0.0218 (6)0.0255 (6)0.0029 (5)0.0060 (5)0.0006 (5)
C250.0363 (7)0.0318 (7)0.0215 (6)0.0038 (6)0.0102 (5)0.0031 (5)
C260.0340 (7)0.0316 (7)0.0186 (6)0.0034 (6)0.0052 (5)0.0021 (5)
C230.0207 (6)0.0264 (6)0.0208 (6)0.0054 (5)0.0033 (5)0.0003 (5)
C220.0215 (6)0.0242 (6)0.0201 (6)0.0050 (5)0.0056 (5)0.0034 (5)
C210.0216 (6)0.0214 (6)0.0219 (6)0.0058 (5)0.0071 (5)0.0005 (5)
C21'0.0228 (6)0.0224 (6)0.0219 (6)0.0054 (5)0.0074 (5)0.0018 (5)
C22'0.0246 (6)0.0253 (6)0.0236 (6)0.0029 (5)0.0026 (5)0.0011 (5)
C23'0.0295 (7)0.0240 (6)0.0294 (7)0.0028 (5)0.0040 (5)0.0046 (5)
C25'0.0259 (6)0.0271 (6)0.0262 (6)0.0045 (5)0.0006 (5)0.0016 (5)
C26'0.0271 (6)0.0230 (6)0.0223 (6)0.0048 (5)0.0055 (5)0.0021 (5)
C24'0.0252 (6)0.0215 (6)0.0336 (7)0.0021 (5)0.0039 (5)0.0005 (5)
C27'0.0338 (7)0.0306 (7)0.0380 (8)0.0095 (6)0.0016 (6)0.0062 (6)
C28'0.0388 (8)0.0274 (7)0.0606 (10)0.0002 (7)0.0095 (7)0.0131 (7)
C380.0267 (7)0.0301 (7)0.0433 (8)0.0003 (6)0.0065 (6)0.0079 (6)
C370.0266 (6)0.0254 (6)0.0298 (7)0.0073 (5)0.0043 (5)0.0049 (5)
C340.0206 (6)0.0208 (6)0.0265 (6)0.0021 (5)0.0011 (5)0.0059 (5)
C350.0208 (6)0.0262 (6)0.0259 (6)0.0041 (5)0.0069 (5)0.0061 (5)
C360.0231 (6)0.0218 (6)0.0208 (6)0.0048 (5)0.0043 (5)0.0016 (5)
C330.0264 (6)0.0231 (6)0.0254 (6)0.0023 (5)0.0044 (5)0.0013 (5)
C320.0215 (6)0.0249 (6)0.0232 (6)0.0027 (5)0.0068 (5)0.0006 (5)
C310.0193 (5)0.0210 (6)0.0188 (6)0.0041 (5)0.0018 (4)0.0043 (4)
C31'0.0202 (6)0.0246 (6)0.0130 (5)0.0022 (5)0.0035 (4)0.0009 (4)
C32'0.0190 (5)0.0259 (6)0.0181 (6)0.0037 (5)0.0042 (4)0.0005 (5)
C33'0.0258 (6)0.0224 (6)0.0178 (6)0.0028 (5)0.0039 (5)0.0003 (5)
C35'0.0193 (6)0.0300 (6)0.0183 (6)0.0026 (5)0.0039 (4)0.0004 (5)
C36'0.0221 (6)0.0220 (6)0.0196 (6)0.0045 (5)0.0046 (5)0.0004 (5)
C34'0.0229 (6)0.0267 (6)0.0123 (5)0.0017 (5)0.0031 (4)0.0004 (4)
C37'0.0253 (6)0.0303 (7)0.0154 (6)0.0024 (5)0.0037 (5)0.0008 (5)
C38'0.0328 (7)0.0335 (7)0.0236 (6)0.0073 (6)0.0041 (5)0.0007 (5)
C480.0328 (8)0.0351 (8)0.0517 (9)0.0024 (6)0.0056 (7)0.0063 (7)
C470.0305 (7)0.0281 (7)0.0381 (8)0.0055 (6)0.0048 (6)0.0034 (6)
C440.0239 (6)0.0240 (6)0.0346 (7)0.0037 (5)0.0075 (5)0.0007 (5)
C450.0227 (6)0.0272 (6)0.0288 (7)0.0063 (5)0.0034 (5)0.0004 (5)
C460.0237 (6)0.0239 (6)0.0256 (6)0.0071 (5)0.0071 (5)0.0033 (5)
C430.0320 (7)0.0257 (7)0.0319 (7)0.0025 (5)0.0076 (6)0.0062 (5)
C420.0289 (6)0.0278 (6)0.0233 (6)0.0037 (5)0.0028 (5)0.0025 (5)
C410.0222 (6)0.0226 (6)0.0252 (6)0.0062 (5)0.0079 (5)0.0001 (5)
C41'0.0247 (6)0.0260 (6)0.0160 (5)0.0046 (5)0.0061 (5)0.0013 (5)
C42'0.0265 (6)0.0242 (6)0.0191 (6)0.0052 (5)0.0042 (5)0.0019 (5)
C43'0.0231 (6)0.0323 (7)0.0173 (6)0.0058 (5)0.0030 (5)0.0017 (5)
C45'0.0285 (6)0.0242 (6)0.0224 (6)0.0048 (5)0.0080 (5)0.0025 (5)
C46'0.0220 (6)0.0271 (6)0.0229 (6)0.0045 (5)0.0061 (5)0.0024 (5)
C44'0.0269 (6)0.0291 (6)0.0153 (6)0.0006 (5)0.0060 (5)0.0006 (5)
C47'0.0293 (7)0.0333 (7)0.0192 (6)0.0042 (6)0.0046 (5)0.0034 (5)
C48'0.0377 (8)0.0360 (8)0.0300 (7)0.0065 (6)0.0032 (6)0.0031 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C18—C171.1736 (18)C38—C371.1684 (18)
C18—H180.9500C38—H380.9500
C17—C141.4454 (17)C37—C341.4450 (17)
C16—C151.3795 (17)C34—C351.3977 (17)
C16—C111.3977 (16)C34—C331.4018 (17)
C16—H160.9500C35—C361.3823 (17)
C15—C141.3968 (17)C35—H350.9500
C15—H150.9500C36—C311.4009 (16)
C14—C131.3974 (16)C36—H360.9500
C13—C121.3820 (17)C33—C321.3809 (17)
C13—H130.9500C33—H330.9500
C12—C111.3955 (16)C32—C311.3976 (16)
C12—H120.9500C32—H320.9500
C11—C11'1.4821 (16)C31—C31'1.4820 (16)
C11'—C16'1.3988 (16)C31'—C32'1.3953 (16)
C11'—C12'1.4008 (16)C31'—C36'1.4009 (15)
C12'—C13'1.3806 (16)C32'—C33'1.3854 (16)
C12'—H12'0.9500C32'—H32'0.9500
C13'—C14'1.4011 (17)C33'—C34'1.3968 (16)
C13'—H13'0.9500C33'—H33'0.9500
C15'—C16'1.3839 (17)C35'—C36'1.3783 (16)
C15'—C14'1.3989 (17)C35'—C34'1.3986 (16)
C15'—H15'0.9500C35'—H35'0.9500
C16'—H16'0.9500C36'—H36'0.9500
C14'—C17'1.4459 (17)C34'—C37'1.4452 (17)
C17'—C18'1.1753 (18)C37'—C38'1.1843 (18)
C18'—H18'0.9500C38'—H38'0.9500
C28—C271.1810 (19)C48—C471.179 (2)
C28—H280.9500C48—H480.9500
C27—C241.4394 (17)C47—C441.4413 (18)
C24—C251.3974 (17)C44—C431.3993 (18)
C24—C231.3979 (17)C44—C451.4008 (18)
C25—C261.3815 (18)C45—C461.3820 (17)
C25—H250.9500C45—H450.9500
C26—C211.3963 (17)C46—C411.3984 (17)
C26—H260.9500C46—H460.9500
C23—C221.3765 (17)C43—C421.3834 (18)
C23—H230.9500C43—H430.9500
C22—C211.3988 (16)C42—C411.3997 (17)
C22—H220.9500C42—H420.9500
C21—C21'1.4803 (17)C41—C41'1.4814 (17)
C21'—C22'1.4019 (17)C41'—C46'1.3998 (17)
C21'—C26'1.4023 (17)C41'—C42'1.4009 (16)
C22'—C23'1.3803 (17)C42'—C43'1.3793 (17)
C22'—H22'0.9500C42'—H42'0.9500
C23'—C24'1.3999 (18)C43'—C44'1.4003 (17)
C23'—H23'0.9500C43'—H43'0.9500
C25'—C26'1.3790 (17)C45'—C46'1.3806 (17)
C25'—C24'1.3982 (18)C45'—C44'1.4004 (17)
C25'—H25'0.9500C45'—H45'0.9500
C26'—H26'0.9500C46'—H46'0.9500
C24'—C27'1.4507 (19)C44'—C47'1.4433 (18)
C27'—C28'1.130 (2)C47'—C48'1.1776 (19)
C28'—H28'0.9500C48'—H48'0.9500
C17—C18—H18180.0C37—C38—H38180.0
C18—C17—C14178.75 (13)C38—C37—C34178.73 (14)
C15—C16—C11121.21 (11)C35—C34—C33118.87 (11)
C15—C16—H16119.4C35—C34—C37120.93 (11)
C11—C16—H16119.4C33—C34—C37120.19 (11)
C16—C15—C14120.62 (11)C36—C35—C34120.60 (11)
C16—C15—H15119.7C36—C35—H35119.7
C14—C15—H15119.7C34—C35—H35119.7
C15—C14—C13118.56 (11)C35—C36—C31120.68 (11)
C15—C14—C17120.51 (11)C35—C36—H36119.7
C13—C14—C17120.93 (10)C31—C36—H36119.7
C12—C13—C14120.40 (11)C32—C33—C34120.30 (11)
C12—C13—H13119.8C32—C33—H33119.8
C14—C13—H13119.8C34—C33—H33119.8
C13—C12—C11121.36 (11)C33—C32—C31121.03 (11)
C13—C12—H12119.3C33—C32—H32119.5
C11—C12—H12119.3C31—C32—H32119.5
C12—C11—C16117.83 (11)C32—C31—C36118.51 (11)
C12—C11—C11'121.22 (10)C32—C31—C31'120.38 (10)
C16—C11—C11'120.92 (10)C36—C31—C31'121.11 (10)
C16'—C11'—C12'118.31 (11)C32'—C31'—C36'118.30 (11)
C16'—C11'—C11121.46 (10)C32'—C31'—C31121.36 (10)
C12'—C11'—C11120.22 (10)C36'—C31'—C31120.34 (10)
C13'—C12'—C11'120.95 (11)C33'—C32'—C31'121.27 (11)
C13'—C12'—H12'119.5C33'—C32'—H32'119.4
C11'—C12'—H12'119.5C31'—C32'—H32'119.4
C12'—C13'—C14'120.52 (11)C32'—C33'—C34'120.02 (11)
C12'—C13'—H13'119.7C32'—C33'—H33'120.0
C14'—C13'—H13'119.7C34'—C33'—H33'120.0
C16'—C15'—C14'120.40 (11)C36'—C35'—C34'120.73 (11)
C16'—C15'—H15'119.8C36'—C35'—H35'119.6
C14'—C15'—H15'119.8C34'—C35'—H35'119.6
C15'—C16'—C11'121.01 (11)C35'—C36'—C31'120.72 (11)
C15'—C16'—H16'119.5C35'—C36'—H36'119.6
C11'—C16'—H16'119.5C31'—C36'—H36'119.6
C15'—C14'—C13'118.81 (11)C33'—C34'—C35'118.94 (11)
C15'—C14'—C17'120.96 (11)C33'—C34'—C37'121.18 (11)
C13'—C14'—C17'120.22 (11)C35'—C34'—C37'119.87 (10)
C18'—C17'—C14'178.63 (13)C38'—C37'—C34'178.12 (13)
C17'—C18'—H18'180.0C37'—C38'—H38'180.0
C27—C28—H28180.0C47—C48—H48180.0
C28—C27—C24178.05 (14)C48—C47—C44178.56 (15)
C25—C24—C23118.29 (11)C43—C44—C45118.61 (11)
C25—C24—C27121.50 (11)C43—C44—C47121.32 (12)
C23—C24—C27120.21 (11)C45—C44—C47120.08 (12)
C26—C25—C24120.65 (11)C46—C45—C44120.54 (12)
C26—C25—H25119.7C46—C45—H45119.7
C24—C25—H25119.7C44—C45—H45119.7
C25—C26—C21121.40 (11)C45—C46—C41121.01 (11)
C25—C26—H26119.3C45—C46—H46119.5
C21—C26—H26119.3C41—C46—H46119.5
C22—C23—C24120.55 (11)C42—C43—C44120.63 (12)
C22—C23—H23119.7C42—C43—H43119.7
C24—C23—H23119.7C44—C43—H43119.7
C23—C22—C21121.67 (11)C43—C42—C41120.86 (12)
C23—C22—H22119.2C43—C42—H42119.6
C21—C22—H22119.2C41—C42—H42119.6
C26—C21—C22117.39 (11)C46—C41—C42118.33 (11)
C26—C21—C21'121.63 (11)C46—C41—C41'120.66 (11)
C22—C21—C21'120.98 (11)C42—C41—C41'120.99 (11)
C22'—C21'—C26'117.62 (11)C46'—C41'—C42'118.25 (11)
C22'—C21'—C21121.01 (11)C46'—C41'—C41121.16 (10)
C26'—C21'—C21121.37 (11)C42'—C41'—C41120.58 (11)
C23'—C22'—C21'121.39 (11)C43'—C42'—C41'120.79 (11)
C23'—C22'—H22'119.3C43'—C42'—H42'119.6
C21'—C22'—H22'119.3C41'—C42'—H42'119.6
C22'—C23'—C24'120.41 (12)C42'—C43'—C44'120.62 (11)
C22'—C23'—H23'119.8C42'—C43'—H43'119.7
C24'—C23'—H23'119.8C44'—C43'—H43'119.7
C26'—C25'—C24'120.59 (11)C46'—C45'—C44'120.07 (11)
C26'—C25'—H25'119.7C46'—C45'—H45'120.0
C24'—C25'—H25'119.7C44'—C45'—H45'120.0
C25'—C26'—C21'121.30 (11)C45'—C46'—C41'121.30 (11)
C25'—C26'—H26'119.4C45'—C46'—H46'119.3
C21'—C26'—H26'119.4C41'—C46'—H46'119.3
C25'—C24'—C23'118.66 (11)C43'—C44'—C45'118.94 (11)
C25'—C24'—C27'120.33 (12)C43'—C44'—C47'119.87 (11)
C23'—C24'—C27'121.01 (12)C45'—C44'—C47'121.19 (11)
C28'—C27'—C24'178.68 (15)C48'—C47'—C44'177.80 (14)
C27'—C28'—H28'180.0C47'—C48'—H48'180.0
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
Cg1, Cg3, Cg4, Cg6 and Cg8 are the centroids of the C11–C16, C21–C26, C21'–C26', C31'–C36' and C41'–C46' rings, respectively.
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C13—H13···Cg6i0.952.733.4910 (13)137
C15—H15···Cg60.952.703.4782 (13)140
C16—H16···Cg1ii0.952.923.5375 (12)124
C23—H23···Cg8i0.952.713.4809 (13)139
C25—H25···Cg80.952.763.4976 (14)136
C33—H33···Cg4iii0.952.883.6153 (13)135
C36—H36···Cg3iii0.952.873.6112 (12)135
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z1; (ii) x+1, y+1, z+1; (iii) x, y, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
Cg1, Cg3, Cg4, Cg6 and Cg8 are the centroids of the C11–C16, C21–C26, C21'–C26', C31'–C36' and C41'–C46' rings, respectively.
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C13—H13···Cg6i0.952.733.4910 (13)137
C15—H15···Cg60.952.703.4782 (13)140
C16'—H16'···Cg1ii0.952.923.5375 (12)124
C23—H23···Cg8i0.952.713.4809 (13)139
C25—H25···Cg80.952.763.4976 (14)136
C33'—H33'···Cg4iii0.952.883.6153 (13)135
C36—H36···Cg3iii0.952.873.6112 (12)135
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y, z1; (ii) x+1, y+1, z+1; (iii) x, y, z+1.

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC16H10
Mr202.24
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)85
a, b, c (Å)23.4263 (5), 21.1181 (5), 9.2989 (2)
β (°) 100.731 (1)
V3)4519.89 (17)
Z16
Radiation typeMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.07
Crystal size (mm)0.46 × 0.40 × 0.07
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker–Nonius APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan
(SADABS; Bruker, 2011)
Tmin, Tmax0.887, 0.980
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
77658, 8885, 7147
Rint0.030
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.617
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.036, 0.103, 1.03
No. of reflections8885
No. of parameters577
No. of restraints42
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.29, 0.16

Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2011) and SAINT (Bruker, 2011), SAINT (Bruker, 2011), SHELXS (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015) and TITAN2000 (Hunter & Simpson, 1999), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), enCIFer (Allen et al., 2004), PLATON (Spek, 2009) and publCIF (Westrip 2010).

 

Acknowledgements

We thank the New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, Science Investment Fund (grant No. UOO-X1206) for support of this work and the University of Otago for the purchase of the diffractometer.

References

First citationAllen, F. H., Johnson, O., Shields, G. P., Smith, B. R. & Towler, M. (2004). J. Appl. Cryst. 37, 335–338.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationAllen, F. H., Kennard, O., Watson, D. G., Brammer, L., Orpen, A. G. & Taylor, R. (1987). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. S1–19.  CSD CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationAnderson, K. M. & Steed, J. W. (2007). CrystEngComm, 9, 328–330.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2011). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationButler, P., Manning, A. R., McAdam, C. J. & Simpson, J. (2008). J. Organomet. Chem. 693, 381–392.  CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationCuffe, L., Hudson, R. D. A., Gallagher, J., Jennings, S., McAdam, C. J., Connelly, R. B. T., Manning, A. R., Robinson, B. H. & Simpson, J. (2005). Organometallics, 24, 2051–2060.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationDesiraju, G. R. (2007). CrystEngComm, 9, 91–92.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationDesiraju, G. R. & Steiner, T. (1999). The Weak Hydrogen Bond in Structural Chemistry and Biology, pp 169–175. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.  Google Scholar
First citationFlood, A. H., McAdam, C. J., Gordon, K. C., Kjaergaard, H. G., Manning, A. R., Robinson, B. H. & Simpson, J. (2007). Polyhedron, 26, 448–455.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationFukuzumi, S., Ohkubo, K. & Suenobu, T. (2014). Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 1455–1464.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationGao, L.-B., Kan, J., Fan, Y., Zhang, L.-Y., Liu, S.-H. & Chen, Z.-N. (2007). Inorg. Chem. 46, 5651–5664.  CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationGroom, C. R. & Allen, F. H. (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 662–671.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationHunter, K. A. & Simpson, J. (1999). TITAN2000. University of Otago, New Zealand.  Google Scholar
First citationIbn Ghazala, S., Paul, F., Toupet, L., Roisnel, T., Hapiot, P. & Lapinte, C. (2006). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 2463–2476.  PubMed Google Scholar
First citationLaliberté, D., Maris, T., Ryan, P. E. & Wuest, J. D. (2006). Cryst. Growth Des. 6, 1335–1340.  Google Scholar
First citationLangley, P. J., Hulliger, J., Thaimattam, R. & Desiraju, G. R. (1998). New J. Chem. 22, 1307–1309.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationLiu, L., Liu, Z., Xu, W., Xu, H., Zhang, D. & Zhu, D. (2005). Tetrahedron, 61, 3813–3817.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationLiu, L., Poon, S.-Y. & Wong, W.-Y. (2005). J. Organomet. Chem. 690, 5036–5048.  CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationMacrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMague, J. T., Foroozesh, M., Hopkins, N. E., Gan, L. L.-S. & Alworth, W. L. (1997). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 27, 183–189.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationMcAdam, C. J., Morgan, J. L., Robinson, B. H., Simpson, J., Rieger, P. H. & Rieger, A. L. (2003). Organometallics, 22, 5126–5136.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationMcAdam, C. J., Robinson, B. H., Simpson, J. & Tagg, T. (2010). Organometallics, 29, 2474–2483.  CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationMcMullan, R. K., Kvick, Å. & Popelier, P. (1992). Acta Cryst. B48, 726–731.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMuller, T., Seichter, W. & Weber, E. (2006). New J. Chem. 30, 751–758.  Google Scholar
First citationNichol, G. S. & Clegg, W. (2007). CrystEngComm, 9, 959–960.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationNitsche, S. I., Weber, E., Seichter, W., Bathori, N., Beketov, K. M. & Roewer, G. (2003). Silicon Chem. 2, 55–71.  CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationO'Brien, Z. J., Karlen, S. D., Khan, S. & Garcia-Garibay, M. A. (2010). J. Org. Chem. 75, 2482–2491.  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationRogozina, M. V., Ionkin, V. N. & Ivanov, A. I. (2013). J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 4564–4573.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationSaha, R., Qaium, M. A., Debnath, D., Younus, M., Chawdhury, N., Sultana, N., Kociok-Köhn, G., Ooi, L., Raithby, P. R. & Kijima, M. (2005). Dalton Trans. pp. 2760–2765.  CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationShanmugaraju, S., Joshi, S. A. & Mukherjee, P. S. (2011). Inorg. Chem. 50, 11736–11745.  CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSpek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSteed, K. M. & Steed, J. W. (2015). Chem. Rev. 115, 2895–2933.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationTagg, T., Kjaergaard, H. G., Lane, J. R., McAdam, C. J., Robinson, B. H. & Simpson, J. (2015). Organometallics, 34, 2662–2666.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationZeng, X., Wang, C., Bryce, M. R., Batsanov, A. S., Sirichantaropass, S., García-Suárez, V. M., Lambert, C. J. & Sage, I. (2007). Eur. J. Org. Chem. pp. 5244–5249.  CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationZeng, L.-Z., Wu, Y.-Y., Tian, G.-X. & Li, Z. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, m607.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationZhou, H., Maris, T. & Wuest, J. D. (2012). J. Phys. Chem. C, 116, 13052–13062.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 71| Part 7| July 2015| Pages 816-820
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds