organic compounds
H-1-benzopyran-2-one
of 3-bromoacetyl-6-chloro-2aDr Reddys Laboratory, Innovation Plaza, IPDO, Bachupally, Hyderabad 500 090, India, and bGITAM University, Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Vishakapatnam, Andhrapradesh, India
*Correspondence e-mail: sudiisc@gmail.com
In the title compound, C11H6BrClO3, the benzopyran ring system is essentially planar, with a maximum deviation of 0.036 (2) Å for the O atom. The Cl and Br atoms are displaced by −0.0526 (8) and 0.6698 (3) Å, respectively, from the mean plane of this ring system. In the crystal, two pairs of weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds to the same acceptor O atom link molecules into inversion dimers.
Keywords: crystal structure; coumarin; hydrogen bonding.
CCDC reference: 739322
1. Related literature
For applications of ); Eid et al. (1994); Hsieh (2015); Ballazhi et al. (2015); Wang (2015); Lanoot et al. (2002); Morris & Russell (1971); Hooper et al. (1982); Khalfan et al. (1987). For related structures, see: Munshi et al. (2004); Munshi & Guru Row (2006); Chopra et al. (2006, 2007a,b).
see: Kale & Patwardhan (20142. Experimental
2.1. Crystal data
|
2.3. Refinement
|
|
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell SAINT (Bruker, 1998); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Window (Farrugia, 2012); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2009).
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 739322
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989015012955/lh5773sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989015012955/lh5773Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989015012955/lh5773Isup3.cml
Coumarins have wide application in the pharmaceutical industry for their antiviral activity (Kale et al., 2014) and antimicrobial activity (Eid et al., 1994). Recently antibacterial activity of the coumarin derivative chloro-chromen-2-one was studied by Lulzime et al., 2015. The coumarin family can also inhibit breast cancer-mediated osteoclastogenesis and this was recently studied (Hsieh et al., 2015; Ballazhi et al., 2015). Further applications of coumarin derivatives for fever, inflammation and pain has been evaluated (Wang et al., 2015). The well known antibiotic Novobiocin (Lanoot et al., 2002; Morris et al., 1971) belongs to coumarin family. The title compound belongs to the 3-acetyl coumarin family. This coumarin family has potential application in the pharmaceutical field, dye industry and developing LASER dyes (Hooper et al., 1982; Khalfan et al., 1987). The
of the title coumarin derivative is reported herein.There are two polymorphic forms of 3-acetyl coumarin reported (Munshi et al., 2004; Munshi et al., 2006). In both cases the structure directing interactions are weak C—H···O hydrogen bonds. In one form (Munshi et al., 2004), a sheet-like structure is formed with two independent molecules in the
and in other form (Munshi et al., 2006) the supramolecular assembly is formed via inter-penetrating sheets with one molecule in the and contains inversion dimer units connected through weak C—H···O interactions. With the substitution of bromine and chlorine (Chopra et al., 2006;2007a,b) in 3-acetyl coumarin there is no significant differnce in the packing and type of weak interactions. In the crystal of the title compound, pairs of bifurcated –(C—H)2···O hydrogen bonds form inversion dimers. The molecular structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1.Synthesis of 3-Bromoacetyl-6-chloro-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one : To a solution of 3-acetyl-6-chloro-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one (222mg, 1mmol) in alcohol free chloroform (5ml), bromine (173.8 mg, 1.1 mmol) in chloroform (2ml) was added with intermittent shaking and warming. The mixture was heated for fifteen minutes on a water bath, cooled and filtered. The solid was washed with ether and crystallized from glacial acetic acid to yield 3-bromoacetyl-6-chloro-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one. Needle shape crystals were obtained by dissolving the title compound in glacial acetic acid and warming for a few minutes in a 10ml beaker. The beaker was covered with paraffin film with few holes in it and left till crystals appeared.
Coumarins have wide application in the pharmaceutical industry for their antiviral activity (Kale et al., 2014) and antimicrobial activity (Eid et al., 1994). Recently antibacterial activity of the coumarin derivative chloro-chromen-2-one was studied by Lulzime et al., 2015. The coumarin family can also inhibit breast cancer-mediated osteoclastogenesis and this was recently studied (Hsieh et al., 2015; Ballazhi et al., 2015). Further applications of coumarin derivatives for fever, inflammation and pain has been evaluated (Wang et al., 2015). The well known antibiotic Novobiocin (Lanoot et al., 2002; Morris et al., 1971) belongs to coumarin family. The title compound belongs to the 3-acetyl coumarin family. This coumarin family has potential application in the pharmaceutical field, dye industry and developing LASER dyes (Hooper et al., 1982; Khalfan et al., 1987). The
of the title coumarin derivative is reported herein.There are two polymorphic forms of 3-acetyl coumarin reported (Munshi et al., 2004; Munshi et al., 2006). In both cases the structure directing interactions are weak C—H···O hydrogen bonds. In one form (Munshi et al., 2004), a sheet-like structure is formed with two independent molecules in the
and in other form (Munshi et al., 2006) the supramolecular assembly is formed via inter-penetrating sheets with one molecule in the and contains inversion dimer units connected through weak C—H···O interactions. With the substitution of bromine and chlorine (Chopra et al., 2006;2007a,b) in 3-acetyl coumarin there is no significant differnce in the packing and type of weak interactions. In the crystal of the title compound, pairs of bifurcated –(C—H)2···O hydrogen bonds form inversion dimers. The molecular structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1.For applications of
see: Kale & Patwardhan (2014); Eid et al. (1994); Hsieh (2015); Ballazhi et al. (2015); Wang (2015); Lanoot et al. (2002); Morris & Russell (1971); Hooper et al. (1982); Khalfan et al. (1987). For related structures, see: Munshi et al. (2004); Munshi & Guru Row (2006); Chopra et al. (2006, 2007a,b).Synthesis of 3-Bromoacetyl-6-chloro-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one : To a solution of 3-acetyl-6-chloro-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one (222mg, 1mmol) in alcohol free chloroform (5ml), bromine (173.8 mg, 1.1 mmol) in chloroform (2ml) was added with intermittent shaking and warming. The mixture was heated for fifteen minutes on a water bath, cooled and filtered. The solid was washed with ether and crystallized from glacial acetic acid to yield 3-bromoacetyl-6-chloro-2H-1-benzopyran-2-one. Needle shape crystals were obtained by dissolving the title compound in glacial acetic acid and warming for a few minutes in a 10ml beaker. The beaker was covered with paraffin film with few holes in it and left till crystals appeared.
detailsAll H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding-model approximation with C—H = 0.93 or 0.97 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C).
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 1998); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Window (Farrugia, 2012); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2009).Fig. 1. The molecular structure of the title compound with displacement ellipsoids for non-H atoms drawn at the 50% probability level. | |
Fig. 2. The reaction scheme. |
C11H6BrClO3 | F(000) = 592 |
Mr = 301.51 | Dx = 1.857 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 2113 reflections |
a = 12.5770 (2) Å | θ = 3.1–26.0° |
b = 5.7977 (1) Å | µ = 4.05 mm−1 |
c = 14.8390 (3) Å | T = 293 K |
β = 94.679 (2)° | Needle, yellow |
V = 1078.42 (3) Å3 | 0.40 × 0.10 × 0.09 mm |
Z = 4 |
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer | 2113 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | 1532 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.031 |
φ and ω scans | θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 3.1° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | h = −15→15 |
Tmin = 0.295, Tmax = 0.712 | k = −7→7 |
20627 measured reflections | l = −18→18 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.030 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.076 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.95 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0424P)2 + 0.3438P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
2113 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
145 parameters | Δρmax = 0.43 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.60 e Å−3 |
C11H6BrClO3 | V = 1078.42 (3) Å3 |
Mr = 301.51 | Z = 4 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 12.5770 (2) Å | µ = 4.05 mm−1 |
b = 5.7977 (1) Å | T = 293 K |
c = 14.8390 (3) Å | 0.40 × 0.10 × 0.09 mm |
β = 94.679 (2)° |
Bruker SMART CCD area-detector diffractometer | 2113 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | 1532 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.295, Tmax = 0.712 | Rint = 0.031 |
20627 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.030 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.076 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.95 | Δρmax = 0.43 e Å−3 |
2113 reflections | Δρmin = −0.60 e Å−3 |
145 parameters |
Geometry. Bond distances, angles etc. have been calculated using the rounded fractional coordinates. All su's are estimated from the variances of the (full) variance-covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account in the estimation of distances, angles and torsion angles |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Br1 | 0.82908 (2) | 0.43513 (6) | 0.08551 (2) | 0.0724 (1) | |
Cl1 | 0.03785 (6) | −0.08546 (14) | 0.11305 (5) | 0.0667 (3) | |
O1 | 0.36571 (16) | 0.6170 (3) | 0.19323 (11) | 0.0522 (6) | |
O2 | 0.52243 (17) | 0.7733 (3) | 0.18198 (12) | 0.0592 (7) | |
O3 | 0.62089 (15) | 0.2132 (3) | 0.03489 (14) | 0.0665 (7) | |
C1 | 0.4668 (2) | 0.6090 (4) | 0.16473 (15) | 0.0450 (9) | |
C2 | 0.4945 (2) | 0.4025 (4) | 0.11494 (14) | 0.0380 (8) | |
C3 | 0.4205 (2) | 0.2395 (4) | 0.09438 (15) | 0.0396 (8) | |
C4 | 0.3152 (2) | 0.2556 (4) | 0.12289 (15) | 0.0403 (8) | |
C5 | 0.2359 (2) | 0.0892 (4) | 0.10347 (16) | 0.0453 (8) | |
C6 | 0.1383 (2) | 0.1173 (5) | 0.13694 (17) | 0.0507 (9) | |
C7 | 0.1178 (3) | 0.3055 (6) | 0.19074 (19) | 0.0624 (10) | |
C8 | 0.1941 (3) | 0.4691 (6) | 0.21009 (19) | 0.0616 (11) | |
C9 | 0.2920 (2) | 0.4454 (4) | 0.17544 (16) | 0.0476 (8) | |
C10 | 0.6045 (2) | 0.3676 (4) | 0.08674 (15) | 0.0422 (8) | |
C11 | 0.6926 (2) | 0.5239 (5) | 0.12365 (18) | 0.0546 (9) | |
H3 | 0.43848 | 0.11242 | 0.06054 | 0.0475* | |
H5 | 0.24924 | −0.03874 | 0.06832 | 0.0543* | |
H7 | 0.05146 | 0.32003 | 0.21373 | 0.0747* | |
H8 | 0.18033 | 0.59506 | 0.24616 | 0.0741* | |
H11A | 0.67683 | 0.68051 | 0.10379 | 0.0655* | |
H11B | 0.69582 | 0.52191 | 0.18918 | 0.0655* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Br1 | 0.0534 (2) | 0.0854 (3) | 0.0780 (2) | −0.0081 (2) | 0.0030 (2) | −0.0066 (2) |
Cl1 | 0.0485 (4) | 0.0861 (6) | 0.0667 (4) | 0.0015 (4) | 0.0129 (3) | 0.0141 (4) |
O1 | 0.0676 (13) | 0.0426 (10) | 0.0454 (10) | 0.0208 (9) | −0.0008 (9) | −0.0103 (8) |
O2 | 0.0855 (15) | 0.0367 (10) | 0.0539 (11) | 0.0024 (10) | −0.0027 (10) | −0.0138 (9) |
O3 | 0.0569 (12) | 0.0673 (13) | 0.0782 (13) | −0.0123 (10) | 0.0231 (10) | −0.0361 (12) |
C1 | 0.0644 (18) | 0.0372 (15) | 0.0318 (12) | 0.0127 (13) | −0.0050 (12) | 0.0010 (11) |
C2 | 0.0543 (15) | 0.0308 (13) | 0.0285 (11) | 0.0060 (11) | 0.0008 (10) | −0.0006 (10) |
C3 | 0.0543 (15) | 0.0338 (13) | 0.0313 (12) | 0.0110 (12) | 0.0075 (11) | −0.0007 (10) |
C4 | 0.0516 (15) | 0.0379 (14) | 0.0315 (12) | 0.0154 (12) | 0.0049 (10) | 0.0030 (10) |
C5 | 0.0509 (15) | 0.0454 (15) | 0.0405 (13) | 0.0126 (13) | 0.0096 (11) | 0.0052 (11) |
C6 | 0.0472 (16) | 0.0639 (18) | 0.0411 (14) | 0.0130 (13) | 0.0050 (12) | 0.0120 (13) |
C7 | 0.0523 (18) | 0.083 (2) | 0.0535 (16) | 0.0289 (17) | 0.0142 (14) | 0.0042 (16) |
C8 | 0.065 (2) | 0.069 (2) | 0.0515 (16) | 0.0325 (17) | 0.0086 (14) | −0.0107 (14) |
C9 | 0.0573 (16) | 0.0468 (15) | 0.0383 (12) | 0.0195 (14) | 0.0013 (11) | 0.0005 (12) |
C10 | 0.0558 (16) | 0.0361 (13) | 0.0348 (12) | −0.0014 (11) | 0.0036 (11) | −0.0017 (11) |
C11 | 0.0595 (18) | 0.0532 (16) | 0.0497 (15) | −0.0032 (13) | −0.0034 (13) | −0.0071 (13) |
Br1—C11 | 1.921 (3) | C5—C6 | 1.371 (4) |
Cl1—C6 | 1.741 (3) | C6—C7 | 1.389 (4) |
O1—C1 | 1.373 (3) | C7—C8 | 1.363 (5) |
O1—C9 | 1.371 (3) | C8—C9 | 1.379 (4) |
O2—C1 | 1.197 (3) | C10—C11 | 1.500 (4) |
O3—C10 | 1.209 (3) | C3—H3 | 0.9300 |
C1—C2 | 1.464 (3) | C5—H5 | 0.9300 |
C2—C3 | 1.344 (3) | C7—H7 | 0.9300 |
C2—C10 | 1.492 (4) | C8—H8 | 0.9300 |
C3—C4 | 1.426 (4) | C11—H11A | 0.9700 |
C4—C5 | 1.401 (3) | C11—H11B | 0.9700 |
C4—C9 | 1.393 (3) | ||
Br1···O3 | 2.9589 (19) | C2···C10viii | 3.417 (3) |
Br1···H8i | 3.1900 | C2···O3viii | 3.389 (3) |
Cl1···C8ii | 3.485 (4) | C3···O2i | 3.343 (3) |
Cl1···Cl1iii | 3.5530 (11) | C3···O2ii | 3.220 (3) |
Cl1···H7iv | 2.9400 | C3···C10viii | 3.518 (3) |
O1···C5v | 3.403 (3) | C3···O3vii | 3.268 (3) |
O1···O2i | 2.992 (3) | C4···O2i | 3.406 (3) |
O2···C3v | 3.220 (3) | C5···O3vii | 3.337 (3) |
O2···C11 | 2.779 (3) | C5···O1ii | 3.403 (3) |
O2···C4vi | 3.406 (3) | C8···Cl1v | 3.485 (4) |
O2···C9vi | 3.180 (3) | C9···O2i | 3.180 (3) |
O2···C2vi | 3.129 (3) | C10···C2viii | 3.417 (3) |
O2···O1vi | 2.992 (3) | C10···C3viii | 3.518 (3) |
O2···C1vi | 2.988 (3) | C11···O2 | 2.779 (3) |
O2···C3vi | 3.343 (3) | C1···H11B | 2.9200 |
O3···Br1 | 2.9589 (19) | C1···H11A | 2.8900 |
O3···C5vii | 3.337 (3) | H3···O2ii | 2.8100 |
O3···C1viii | 3.244 (3) | H3···O3 | 2.4300 |
O3···C2viii | 3.389 (3) | H3···H5 | 2.5500 |
O3···C3vii | 3.268 (3) | H3···O3vii | 2.4400 |
O2···H11A | 2.4000 | H5···H3 | 2.5500 |
O2···H11B | 2.6200 | H5···O3vii | 2.5400 |
O2···H3v | 2.8100 | H7···Cl1ix | 2.9400 |
O3···H3 | 2.4300 | H8···Br1vi | 3.1900 |
O3···H3vii | 2.4400 | H11A···O2 | 2.4000 |
O3···H5vii | 2.5400 | H11A···C1 | 2.8900 |
C1···O3viii | 3.244 (3) | H11B···O2 | 2.6200 |
C1···O2i | 2.988 (3) | H11B···C1 | 2.9200 |
C2···O2i | 3.129 (3) | ||
C1—O1—C9 | 123.02 (19) | C4—C9—C8 | 121.4 (2) |
O1—C1—O2 | 116.6 (2) | O3—C10—C2 | 119.3 (2) |
O1—C1—C2 | 116.6 (2) | O3—C10—C11 | 121.4 (2) |
O2—C1—C2 | 126.9 (2) | C2—C10—C11 | 119.4 (2) |
C1—C2—C3 | 120.1 (2) | Br1—C11—C10 | 112.44 (18) |
C1—C2—C10 | 121.1 (2) | C2—C3—H3 | 119.00 |
C3—C2—C10 | 118.8 (2) | C4—C3—H3 | 119.00 |
C2—C3—C4 | 122.0 (2) | C4—C5—H5 | 120.00 |
C3—C4—C5 | 123.8 (2) | C6—C5—H5 | 120.00 |
C3—C4—C9 | 117.4 (2) | C6—C7—H7 | 120.00 |
C5—C4—C9 | 118.8 (2) | C8—C7—H7 | 120.00 |
C4—C5—C6 | 119.2 (2) | C7—C8—H8 | 120.00 |
Cl1—C6—C5 | 120.2 (2) | C9—C8—H8 | 120.00 |
Cl1—C6—C7 | 118.8 (2) | Br1—C11—H11A | 109.00 |
C5—C6—C7 | 121.0 (3) | Br1—C11—H11B | 109.00 |
C6—C7—C8 | 120.5 (3) | C10—C11—H11A | 109.00 |
C7—C8—C9 | 119.1 (3) | C10—C11—H11B | 109.00 |
O1—C9—C4 | 120.8 (2) | H11A—C11—H11B | 108.00 |
O1—C9—C8 | 117.8 (2) | ||
C9—O1—C1—O2 | 177.6 (2) | C3—C4—C5—C6 | 177.6 (2) |
C9—O1—C1—C2 | −1.3 (3) | C9—C4—C5—C6 | −0.3 (3) |
C1—O1—C9—C4 | −3.0 (3) | C3—C4—C9—O1 | 4.5 (3) |
C1—O1—C9—C8 | 177.9 (2) | C3—C4—C9—C8 | −176.5 (2) |
O1—C1—C2—C3 | 4.1 (3) | C5—C4—C9—O1 | −177.5 (2) |
O1—C1—C2—C10 | −175.44 (19) | C5—C4—C9—C8 | 1.6 (4) |
O2—C1—C2—C3 | −174.6 (2) | C4—C5—C6—Cl1 | 179.43 (19) |
O2—C1—C2—C10 | 5.9 (4) | C4—C5—C6—C7 | −1.1 (4) |
C1—C2—C3—C4 | −2.7 (3) | Cl1—C6—C7—C8 | −179.3 (2) |
C10—C2—C3—C4 | 176.9 (2) | C5—C6—C7—C8 | 1.2 (4) |
C1—C2—C10—O3 | −169.4 (2) | C6—C7—C8—C9 | 0.1 (4) |
C1—C2—C10—C11 | 10.9 (3) | C7—C8—C9—O1 | 177.6 (3) |
C3—C2—C10—O3 | 11.0 (3) | C7—C8—C9—C4 | −1.4 (4) |
C3—C2—C10—C11 | −168.7 (2) | O3—C10—C11—Br1 | −3.9 (3) |
C2—C3—C4—C5 | −179.6 (2) | C2—C10—C11—Br1 | 175.83 (17) |
C2—C3—C4—C9 | −1.6 (3) |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (ii) x, y−1, z; (iii) −x, −y, −z; (iv) −x, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (v) x, y+1, z; (vi) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (vii) −x+1, −y, −z; (viii) −x+1, −y+1, −z; (ix) −x, y+1/2, −z+1/2. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
C3—H3···O3vii | 0.9300 | 2.4400 | 3.268 (3) | 148.00 |
C5—H5···O3vii | 0.9300 | 2.5400 | 3.337 (3) | 144.00 |
Symmetry code: (vii) −x+1, −y, −z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
C3—H3···O3i | 0.9300 | 2.4400 | 3.268 (3) | 148.00 |
C5—H5···O3i | 0.9300 | 2.5400 | 3.337 (3) | 144.00 |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y, −z. |
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Professor T. N. Guru Row, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, for scientific discussions and the data collection.
References
Ballazhi, L., Popovski, E., Jashari, A., Imeri, F., Ibrahimi, I., Mikhova, B. & Mladenovska, K. (2015). Acta Pharm. 65, 53–63. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bruker (1998). SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Chopra, D., Venugopala, K. N. & Rao, G. K. (2007a). Acta Cryst. E63, o4872. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Chopra, D., Venugopala, K. N., Rao, G. K. & Guru Row, T. N. (2007b). Acta Cryst. E63, o2826. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Chopra, D., Venugopal, K. N., Jayashree, B. S. & Row, T. N. G. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o2310–o2312. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Eid, A. I., Ragab, F. A., El-Ansary, S. L., El-Gazayerly, S. M. & Mourad, F. E. (1994). Arch. Pharm. Pharm. Med. Chem. 327, 211–213. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hooper, D. C., Wolfson, J. S., McHugh, G. L., Winters, M. B. & Swartz, M. N. (1982). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 22, 662–671. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Hsieh, C. (2015). Int. J. Oncol. 46, 2, 555–562. Google Scholar
Kale, M. & Patwardhan, K. (2014). Curr. Pharm. Res.4, 1150-1158. Google Scholar
Khalfan, H., Abuknesha, R., Rond-Weaver, M., Price, R. G. & Robinson, R. (1987). Chem. Abstr. 106, 63932. Google Scholar
Lanoot, B., Vancanneyt, M., Cleenwerck, I., Wang, L., Li, W., Liu, Z. & Swings, J. (2002). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52, 823–829. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Morris, A. & Russell, A. D. (1971). Prog. Med. Chem. 8, 39–59. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Munshi, P. & Guru Row, T. N. (2006). Cryst. Growth Des. 6, 708–718. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Munshi, P., Venugopala, K. N., Jayashree, B. S. & Guru Row, T. N. (2004). Cryst. Growth Des. 4, 1105–1107. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wang, R. (2015). CN Patent CN 104557831 A. Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.