metal-organic compounds
μ-iodido-bis[bis(acetonitrile-κN)copper(I)]
of di-aFakultät für Chemie und Chemische Biologie, Technische Universität Dortmund, Otto-Hahn-Strasse 6, 44227 Dortmund, Germany, and bInstitut UTINAM, UMR CNRS 6213, Université de Franche-Comté, 16 Route de Gray, 25030 Besançon, France
*Correspondence e-mail: carsten.strohmann@tu-dortmund.de
The title compound, [Cu2I2(CH3CN)4], exhibits a centrosymmetric Cu2I2 core [Cu⋯Cu distance = 2.7482 (11) Å], the CuI atoms of which are further coordinated by four molecules of acetonitrile. The CuI atom has an overall distorted tetrahedral coordination environment evidenced by L—Cu—L angles (L = N or I) ranging from 100.47 (10) to 117.06 (2)°. The coordination geometries of the acetonitrile ligands deviate slightly from linearity as shown by Cu—N—C angles of 167.0 (2) and 172.7 (2)°. In the crystal, there are no significant hydrogen-bonding interactions present, so the crystal packing seems to be formed predominantly by van der Waals forces.
Keywords: crystal structure; copper(I) iodide complex; dimer.
CCDC reference: 1427944
1. Related literature
The title molecule is the active species used for the synthesis of luminescent compounds with (CuI)n moieties, prepared by treatment with sulfur ligands. For more details of syntheses and properties of these compounds, see: Knorr et al. (2012, 2014, 2015). The N—Cu—N angle of 100.47 (10)° in the title compound is comparable with that found in the pyridine-coordinated CuI dimer (Dyason et al., 1984). For crystal structures of CuI dimers with additional diamine ligands, see: Haitko (2007); Garbauskas et al. (1986). The title compound represents, to the best of our knowledge, the first crystallographic characterization of CuI with acetonitrile as the only co-ligand, probably caused by the sensitive nature of the crystals. In the solid state, CuI appears as a polymer (Wyckoff & Posnjak, 1922).
2. Experimental
2.1. Crystal data
|
2.3. Refinement
|
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2003); cell SAINT (Bruker, 2003); data reduction: SAINT ; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS2014 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 1427944
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989015018149/wm5208sup1.cif
contains datablock I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989015018149/wm5208Isup2.hkl
The title compound occured as a byproduct from the synthesis of copper(I) iodide compounds (see: Related literature). CuI was dissolved in acetonitrile and treated with an excess of sulfur ligands (i.e. dimethyl sulfide). After stirring, the solution was stored in a refridgerator over night, followed by keeping it in a freezer (Knorr et al., 2015). In addition to the crystallized CuI compounds, the title compound could be isolated in traces.
The title molecule is the active species used for the synthesis of luminescent compounds with (CuI)n moieties, prepared by treatment with sulfur ligands. For more details of syntheses and properties of these compounds, see: Knorr et al. (2012, 2014, 2015). The N—Cu—N angle of 100.47 (10)° in the title compound is comparable with that found in the pyridine-coordinated CuI dimer (Dyason et al., 1984). For crystal structures of CuI dimers with additional diamine ligands, see: Haitko (2007); Garbauskas et al. (1986). The title compound represents, to the best of our knowledge, the first crystallographic characterization of CuI with acetonitrile as the only co-ligand, probably caused by the sensitive nature of the crystals. In the solid state, CuI appears as a polymer (Wyckoff & Posnjak, 1922).
The title compound occured as a byproduct from the synthesis of copper(I) iodide compounds (see: Related literature). CuI was dissolved in acetonitrile and treated with an excess of sulfur ligands (i.e. dimethyl sulfide). After stirring, the solution was stored in a refridgerator over night, followed by keeping it in a freezer (Knorr et al., 2015). In addition to the crystallized CuI compounds, the title compound could be isolated in traces.
detailsMethyl hydrogen atoms were set geometrically and refined as a rotating group with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C).
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2003); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2003); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2003); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS2014 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).[Cu2I2(C2H3N)4] | F(000) = 504 |
Mr = 545.10 | Dx = 2.320 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 7.669 (3) Å | Cell parameters from 5543 reflections |
b = 14.367 (5) Å | θ = 2.8–27.1° |
c = 7.944 (3) Å | µ = 6.66 mm−1 |
β = 116.957 (5)° | T = 173 K |
V = 780.2 (5) Å3 | Block, colourless |
Z = 2 | 0.4 × 0.3 × 0.2 mm |
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer | 1628 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.052 |
phi and ω scans | θmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.8° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2003) | h = −9→9 |
Tmin = 0.178, Tmax = 1 | k = −18→18 |
18211 measured reflections | l = −10→10 |
1696 independent reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
Least-squares matrix: full | H-atom parameters constrained |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.021 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0281P)2 + 0.2851P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
wR(F2) = 0.056 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
S = 1.16 | Δρmax = 0.77 e Å−3 |
1696 reflections | Δρmin = −0.70 e Å−3 |
76 parameters | Extinction correction: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
0 restraints | Extinction coefficient: 0.0356 (10) |
[Cu2I2(C2H3N)4] | V = 780.2 (5) Å3 |
Mr = 545.10 | Z = 2 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation |
a = 7.669 (3) Å | µ = 6.66 mm−1 |
b = 14.367 (5) Å | T = 173 K |
c = 7.944 (3) Å | 0.4 × 0.3 × 0.2 mm |
β = 116.957 (5)° |
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer | 1696 independent reflections |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2003) | 1628 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Tmin = 0.178, Tmax = 1 | Rint = 0.052 |
18211 measured reflections |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.021 | 0 restraints |
wR(F2) = 0.056 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 1.16 | Δρmax = 0.77 e Å−3 |
1696 reflections | Δρmin = −0.70 e Å−3 |
76 parameters |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. 1. Fixed Uiso At 1.5 times of: All C(H,H,H) groups 2.a Idealized Me refined as rotating group: C2(H2A,H2B,H2C), C4(H4A,H4B,H4C) |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
C1 | 0.2924 (4) | 0.35511 (17) | 0.2436 (4) | 0.0327 (5) | |
C2 | 0.3602 (5) | 0.3046 (2) | 0.1258 (5) | 0.0477 (7) | |
H2A | 0.3147 | 0.2400 | 0.1117 | 0.072* | |
H2B | 0.5035 | 0.3057 | 0.1851 | 0.072* | |
H2C | 0.3081 | 0.3341 | 0.0012 | 0.072* | |
C3 | 0.5869 (4) | 0.43439 (18) | 0.8689 (4) | 0.0327 (5) | |
C4 | 0.7870 (4) | 0.4169 (2) | 1.0081 (4) | 0.0440 (6) | |
H4A | 0.7881 | 0.3711 | 1.1000 | 0.066* | |
H4B | 0.8464 | 0.4750 | 1.0734 | 0.066* | |
H4C | 0.8617 | 0.3927 | 0.9451 | 0.066* | |
Cu | 0.17322 (5) | 0.46160 (2) | 0.52217 (4) | 0.03798 (12) | |
I | −0.09223 (2) | 0.36402 (2) | 0.57402 (3) | 0.03945 (11) | |
N1 | 0.2374 (3) | 0.39446 (16) | 0.3335 (3) | 0.0386 (5) | |
N2 | 0.4306 (3) | 0.44856 (16) | 0.7589 (3) | 0.0402 (5) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
C1 | 0.0351 (13) | 0.0281 (12) | 0.0329 (13) | −0.0024 (9) | 0.0137 (11) | 0.0016 (9) |
C2 | 0.0589 (18) | 0.0430 (15) | 0.0494 (17) | −0.0014 (13) | 0.0318 (15) | −0.0063 (13) |
C3 | 0.0348 (13) | 0.0328 (12) | 0.0294 (11) | −0.0015 (10) | 0.0137 (10) | 0.0003 (10) |
C4 | 0.0323 (13) | 0.0523 (17) | 0.0381 (14) | 0.0054 (12) | 0.0077 (11) | 0.0013 (12) |
Cu | 0.03422 (19) | 0.0400 (2) | 0.03415 (19) | 0.00505 (13) | 0.01066 (14) | −0.00146 (13) |
I | 0.03990 (14) | 0.03205 (13) | 0.04649 (15) | 0.00095 (6) | 0.01965 (10) | 0.00337 (6) |
N1 | 0.0407 (12) | 0.0370 (12) | 0.0369 (12) | 0.0027 (10) | 0.0164 (10) | −0.0009 (10) |
N2 | 0.0345 (12) | 0.0438 (13) | 0.0353 (11) | 0.0002 (10) | 0.0096 (10) | 0.0007 (10) |
C1—C2 | 1.454 (4) | C4—H4B | 0.9800 |
C1—N1 | 1.132 (4) | C4—H4C | 0.9800 |
C2—H2A | 0.9800 | Cu—Cui | 2.7482 (11) |
C2—H2B | 0.9800 | Cu—Ii | 2.6108 (10) |
C2—H2C | 0.9800 | Cu—I | 2.6532 (8) |
C3—C4 | 1.450 (3) | Cu—N1 | 2.022 (2) |
C3—N2 | 1.137 (3) | Cu—N2 | 2.025 (2) |
C4—H4A | 0.9800 | I—Cui | 2.6108 (10) |
N1—C1—C2 | 179.2 (3) | I—Cu—Cui | 57.78 (3) |
C1—C2—H2A | 109.5 | Ii—Cu—Cui | 59.286 (14) |
C1—C2—H2B | 109.5 | Ii—Cu—I | 117.06 (2) |
C1—C2—H2C | 109.5 | N1—Cu—Cui | 129.99 (7) |
H2A—C2—H2B | 109.5 | N1—Cu—I | 108.95 (7) |
H2A—C2—H2C | 109.5 | N1—Cu—Ii | 110.27 (7) |
H2B—C2—H2C | 109.5 | N1—Cu—N2 | 100.47 (10) |
N2—C3—C4 | 179.4 (3) | N2—Cu—Cui | 129.41 (8) |
C3—C4—H4A | 109.5 | N2—Cu—I | 107.48 (8) |
C3—C4—H4B | 109.5 | N2—Cu—Ii | 111.28 (7) |
C3—C4—H4C | 109.5 | Cui—I—Cu | 62.94 (2) |
H4A—C4—H4B | 109.5 | C1—N1—Cu | 172.7 (2) |
H4A—C4—H4C | 109.5 | C3—N2—Cu | 167.0 (2) |
H4B—C4—H4C | 109.5 |
Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y+1, −z+1. |
Experimental details
Crystal data | |
Chemical formula | [Cu2I2(C2H3N)4] |
Mr | 545.10 |
Crystal system, space group | Monoclinic, P21/c |
Temperature (K) | 173 |
a, b, c (Å) | 7.669 (3), 14.367 (5), 7.944 (3) |
β (°) | 116.957 (5) |
V (Å3) | 780.2 (5) |
Z | 2 |
Radiation type | Mo Kα |
µ (mm−1) | 6.66 |
Crystal size (mm) | 0.4 × 0.3 × 0.2 |
Data collection | |
Diffractometer | Bruker APEXII CCD |
Absorption correction | Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2003) |
Tmin, Tmax | 0.178, 1 |
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections | 18211, 1696, 1628 |
Rint | 0.052 |
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) | 0.639 |
Refinement | |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S | 0.021, 0.056, 1.16 |
No. of reflections | 1696 |
No. of parameters | 76 |
H-atom treatment | H-atom parameters constrained |
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) | 0.77, −0.70 |
Computer programs: APEX2 (Bruker, 2003), SAINT (Bruker, 2003), SHELXS2014 (Sheldrick, 2008), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008), OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) for financial support.
References
Bruker (2003). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Dyason, J. C., Engelhardt, L. M., Healy, P. C. & White, A. H. (1984). Aust. J. Chem. 37, 2201–2205. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Garbauskas, M. F., Haitko, D. A. & Kasper, J. S. (1986). J. Crystallogr. Spectrosc. Res. 16, 729–738. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Haitko, D. A. (2007). J. Coord. Chem. 13, 119–122. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Knorr, M., Bonnot, A., Lapprand, A., Khatyr, A., Strohmann, C., Kubicki, M. M., Rousselin, Y. & Harvey, P. D. (2015). Inorg. Chem. 54, 4076–4093. CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Knorr, M., Guyon, F., Khatyr, A., Strohmann, C., Allain, M., Aly, A. M., Lapprand, A., Fortin, D. & Harvey, P. D. (2012). Inorg. Chem. 51, 9917–9934. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Knorr, M., Khatyr, A., Dini Aleo, A., El Yaagoubi, A., Strohmann, C., Kubicki, M. M., Rousselin, Y., Aly, A. M., Fortin, D., Lapprand, A. & Harvey, P. D. (2014). Cryst. Growth Des. 14, 5373–5387. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wyckoff, R. W. G. & Posnjak, E. (1922). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 44, 30–36. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.