research communications
3)6][Co(CO)4]2
of [Co(NHaAnorganische Chemie, Fluorchemie, Fachbereich Chemie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Hans-Meerwein-Strasse 4, 35032 Marburg, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: florian.kraus@chemie.uni-marburg.de
Hexaamminecobalt(II) bis[tetracarbonylcobaltate(-I)], [Co(NH3)6][Co(CO)4]2, was synthesized by reaction of liquid ammonia with Co2(CO)8. The CoII atom is coordinated by six ammine ligands. The resulting polyhedron, the hexaamminecobalt(II) cation, exhibits symmetry -3. The Co-I atom is coordinated by four carbonyl ligands, leading to a tetracarbonylcobaltate(−I) anion in the shape of a slightly distorted tetrahedron, with symmetry 3. The is related to that of high-pressure BaC2 (space group R-3m), with the [Co(NH3)6]2+ cations replacing the Ba sites and the [Co(CO)4]− anions replacing the C sites. N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds between cations and anions stabilize the structural set-up in the title compound.
Keywords: crystal structure; cobalt carbonyl; ammonia; hydrogen bonding.
CCDC reference: 1433399
1. Chemical context
The reaction of Co2(CO)8 with bases has already been described in the literature (Hieber et al., 1960). In addition, the reaction of dicobalt octacarbonyl with liquid ammonia has been known for several decades (Behrens & Wakamatsu, 1966). Thereby Co2(CO)8 forms with NH3 hexaamminecobalt(II) bis[tetracarbonylcobaltate(–I)], [Co(NH3)6][Co(CO)4]2, which is obtained as orange air-sensitive crystals. During this reaction, CO is released and reacts with ammonia to urea. However, structural data of of the title compound were missing and are presented in this communication.
2. Structural commentary
The cobalt atom Co1 of the hexaamminecobalt(II) cation occupies a with .. It is coordinated by six symmetry-related ammine ligands in form of a slightly distorted octahedron. The Co—N distance in the [Co(NH3)6] octahedron is 2.1876 (16) Å which compares well with those of other reported hexaamminecobalt(II) structures (Barnet et al., 1966).
3The cobalt atom Co2 of the tetracarbonylcobaltate(–I) anion occupies c and exhibits 3.. It is coordinated by four carbonyl ligands in a shape close to an ideal tetrahedron. The distances between the Co2 atom and the carbon atoms C1 and C2 of the ligands are 1.7664 (18) and 1.779 (3) Å, respectively. In the literature, distances in the range from 1.77 (2) to 1.82 (2) Å are reported for Co—C in the compound Co2(CO)8 (Sumner et al., 1964). In the carbonyl ligands, the observed distances are in the expected range with 1.153 (2) and 1.140 (4) Å for C1—O1 and C2—O2, respectively. For the compound Co2(CO)8 distances from 1.14 (2) to 1.33 (2) Å were reported (Sumner et al., 1964).
6The 3)6][Co(CO)4]2 can be derived from the high-pressure rhombohedral phase of BaC2 (BaC2 -HP1, Rm) (Efthimiopoulos et al., 2012). Formally, the Ba sites on 3a are replaced by the hexaammine cobalt(II) octahedra and the C site on position 6c is replaced by the tetracarbonylcobaltate(–I) tetrahedron.
of [Co(NHThe molecular components of the title compound are shown in Fig. 1. The of [Co(NH3)6][Co(CO)4]2 projected along [001] is shown in Fig. 2.
3. Supramolecular features
The arrangement of [Co(NH3)6]2+ octahedra and [Co(CO)4]− tetrahedra in the is stabilized by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds with the N1 atom as donor and the oxygen atoms O1 and O2 as acceptors atoms. One of the hydrogen bonds (N—H1C) is forked while, remarkably, in the neighbourhood of the hydrogen atom H1B no acceptor atom in the range of the sum of the van der Waals radii is present. Detailed information about hydrogen-bonding distances and angles are given in Table 1.
4. Synthesis and crystallization
86 mg (29.4 mmol) of Co2(CO)8 were placed in a flame-dried bomb tube under argon. 0.2 ml of liquid ammonia were condensed to the bomb tube. The bomb tube, now containing an orange solution, was flame-sealed and stored at room temperature. The reaction equation is given in Fig. 3. After six months of crystallization time, moisture- and temperature-sensitive, orange single crystals of the title compound were obtained in almost quantitative yield from the still orange solution. After manual separation of the crystals under a light-optical microscope and evaporation of the solvent only a minute orange residue remained.
5. Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure . All hydrogen atoms of the ammine ligands were located from a difference Fourier map and were refined isotropically without any further restraints.
details are summarized in Table 2Supporting information
CCDC reference: 1433399
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989015020290/wm5229sup1.cif
contains datablock I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989015020290/wm5229Isup2.hkl
Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2011); cell
X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2011); data reduction: X-RED32 (Stoe & Cie, 2009); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXLE (Hübschle et al., 2011) and SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2015); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).[Co(NH3)6][Co(CO)4]2 | Dx = 1.801 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 503.07 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Trigonal, R3 | Cell parameters from 15618 reflections |
a = 9.3679 (4) Å | θ = 3.3–33.4° |
c = 18.3089 (18) Å | µ = 2.70 mm−1 |
V = 1391.48 (18) Å3 | T = 100 K |
Z = 3 | Block, orange |
F(000) = 759 | 0.16 × 0.12 × 0.08 mm |
Stoe IPDS-2T diffractometer | 994 independent reflections |
Radiation source: sealed X-ray tube, 12 x 0.4 mm long-fine focus | 910 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Plane graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.087 |
Detector resolution: 6.67 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 31.0°, θmin = 3.3° |
rotation method scans | h = −13→13 |
Absorption correction: integration (X-RED32 and X-SHAPE; Stoe & Cie, 2009) | k = −13→13 |
Tmin = 0.649, Tmax = 0.907 | l = −26→26 |
7025 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | All H-atom parameters refined |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0529P)2 + 1.0515P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
wR(F2) = 0.090 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
S = 1.08 | Δρmax = 0.87 e Å−3 |
994 reflections | Δρmin = −0.65 e Å−3 |
52 parameters | Extinction correction: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
0 restraints | Extinction coefficient: 0.0040 (8) |
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Co1 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.01863 (18) | |
Co2 | −0.6667 | −0.3333 | 0.04221 (2) | 0.01972 (17) | |
O1 | −0.61903 (19) | −0.02591 (18) | 0.10467 (9) | 0.0315 (3) | |
O2 | −0.6667 | −0.3333 | −0.11725 (14) | 0.0298 (5) | |
N1 | −0.0266 (2) | −0.2037 (2) | 0.06820 (9) | 0.0245 (3) | |
C1 | −0.6354 (2) | −0.1451 (2) | 0.07846 (10) | 0.0231 (3) | |
C2 | −0.6667 | −0.3333 | −0.05497 (19) | 0.0237 (5) | |
H1A | −0.121 (5) | −0.295 (5) | 0.0656 (19) | 0.054 (10)* | |
H1B | 0.034 (4) | −0.247 (4) | 0.0558 (17) | 0.038 (7)* | |
H1C | −0.001 (4) | −0.176 (4) | 0.1135 (19) | 0.043 (8)* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Co1 | 0.0160 (2) | 0.0160 (2) | 0.0240 (3) | 0.00799 (10) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Co2 | 0.01726 (19) | 0.01726 (19) | 0.0247 (3) | 0.00863 (9) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
O1 | 0.0323 (7) | 0.0236 (7) | 0.0410 (8) | 0.0158 (6) | −0.0025 (6) | −0.0036 (5) |
O2 | 0.0316 (8) | 0.0316 (8) | 0.0262 (12) | 0.0158 (4) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
N1 | 0.0209 (7) | 0.0212 (7) | 0.0307 (7) | 0.0101 (6) | −0.0002 (5) | 0.0015 (5) |
C1 | 0.0192 (7) | 0.0203 (7) | 0.0292 (8) | 0.0095 (6) | −0.0007 (6) | 0.0009 (6) |
C2 | 0.0198 (8) | 0.0198 (8) | 0.0317 (15) | 0.0099 (4) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Co1—N1i | 2.1876 (16) | Co2—C1 | 1.7664 (18) |
Co1—N1ii | 2.1876 (16) | Co2—C1vi | 1.7664 (18) |
Co1—N1iii | 2.1876 (16) | Co2—C1vii | 1.7664 (18) |
Co1—N1iv | 2.1876 (16) | Co2—C2 | 1.779 (3) |
Co1—N1 | 2.1877 (16) | O1—C1 | 1.153 (2) |
Co1—N1v | 2.1877 (16) | O2—C2 | 1.140 (4) |
N1i—Co1—N1ii | 180.00 (9) | N1iii—Co1—N1v | 90.65 (6) |
N1i—Co1—N1iii | 90.65 (6) | N1iv—Co1—N1v | 89.35 (6) |
N1ii—Co1—N1iii | 89.35 (6) | N1—Co1—N1v | 180.0 |
N1i—Co1—N1iv | 89.35 (6) | C1—Co2—C1vi | 106.76 (7) |
N1ii—Co1—N1iv | 90.65 (6) | C1—Co2—C1vii | 106.75 (7) |
N1iii—Co1—N1iv | 180.00 (11) | C1vi—Co2—C1vii | 106.75 (7) |
N1i—Co1—N1 | 89.35 (6) | C1—Co2—C2 | 112.07 (6) |
N1ii—Co1—N1 | 90.65 (6) | C1vi—Co2—C2 | 112.07 (6) |
N1iii—Co1—N1 | 89.35 (6) | C1vii—Co2—C2 | 112.07 (6) |
N1iv—Co1—N1 | 90.65 (6) | O1—C1—Co2 | 177.07 (17) |
N1i—Co1—N1v | 90.65 (6) | O2—C2—Co2 | 180.0 |
N1ii—Co1—N1v | 89.35 (6) |
Symmetry codes: (i) x−y, x, −z; (ii) −x+y, −x, z; (iii) y, −x+y, −z; (iv) −y, x−y, z; (v) −x, −y, −z; (vi) −y−1, x−y, z; (vii) −x+y−1, −x−1, z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1A···O1vii | 0.87 (4) | 2.49 (4) | 3.159 (2) | 135 (3) |
N1—H1C···O1viii | 0.87 (3) | 2.59 (3) | 3.290 (2) | 138 (3) |
N1—H1C···O2ix | 0.87 (3) | 2.49 (3) | 3.249 (3) | 146 (3) |
Symmetry codes: (vii) −x+y−1, −x−1, z; (viii) x−y+2/3, x+1/3, −z+1/3; (ix) x+2/3, y+1/3, z+1/3. |
Acknowledgements
FK thanks the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for his Heisenberg professorship.
References
Barnet, M. T., Craven, B. M., Freeman, H. C., Kime, N. E. & Ibers, J. A. (1966). Chem. Commun. (London), 10, 307–308. CrossRef Google Scholar
Behrens, H. & Wakamatsu, H. (1966). Chem. Ber. 99, 2753–2756. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Brandenburg, K. (2015). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Efthimiopoulos, I., Kunc, K., Vazhenin, G. V., Stavrou, E., Syassen, K., Hanfland, M., Liebig, S. & Ruschewitz, U. (2012). Phys. Rev. B, 85, 054105. CrossRef Google Scholar
Hieber, W., Beck, W. & Braun, G. (1960). Angew. Chem. 72, 795–801. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hübschle, C. B., Sheldrick, G. M. & Dittrich, B. (2011). J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 1281–1284. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Stoe & Cie (2009). X-RED32 and X-SHAPE. Stoe & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany. Google Scholar
Stoe & Cie (2011). X-AREA. Stoe & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany. Google Scholar
Sumner, G. G., Klug, H. P. & Alexander, L. E. (1964). Acta Cryst. 17, 732–742. CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.