Crystal structure of trans-bis­(di­ethano­lamine-κ3O,N,O′)manganese(II) bis­(3-amino­benzoate)

Ibragimov, A.B.; Zakirov, B.S.; Ashurov, J.M.

doi:10.1107/S2056989016004072

research communications

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 72| Part 4| April 2016| Pages 502-504

https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989016004072

Open

access

Crystal structure of trans-bis(diethanolamine-κ³O,N,O′)manganese(II) bis(3-aminobenzoate)

Aziz B. Ibragimov,^a ^* Bakhtiyar S. Zakirov ^a and Jamshid M. Ashurov ^b

^aInstitute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of Uzbekistan Academy of Sciences, M. Ulugbek Str. 77a, Tashkent 700170, Uzbekistan, and ^bInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan, M. Ulugbek Str. 83, Tashkent 700125, Uzbekistan
^*Correspondence e-mail: aziz_ibragimov@mail.ru

Edited by M. Weil, Vienna University of Technology, Austria (Received 29 February 2016; accepted 10 March 2016; online 15 March 2016)

Reaction of m-aminobenzoic acid (MABA), diethanolamine (DEA) and MnCl₂·4H₂O led to the formation of the title salt, [Mn(C₄H₁₁NO₂)₂](C₇H₆NO₂)₂. In the complex cation, the Mn²⁺ ion is located on an inversion centre and is coordinated by two symmetry-related tridentate DEA molecules, leading to the formation of a slightly distorted MnN₂O₄ octahedron. The MABA⁻ counter-anions are connected to the complex ion by a pair of rather strong O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, yielding a 1:2 supramolecular aggregate. Much weaker N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds connect neighbouring aggregates into a three-dimensional network structure.

Keywords: crystal structure; coordination compound; 2-aminobenzoic acid; diethanolamine; Mn complex; hydrogen bonding.

CCDC reference: 1463701

1. Chemical context

In contrast to the two other isomers of aminobenzoic acid, viz. p-aminobenzoic acid (or vitamin B₁₀) and o-aminobenzoic acid (or antranylic acid), m-aminobenzoic acid (3-aminobenzoic acid or MABA) is not biologically active. Nevertheless, we are studying this substance within the context of mixed-ligand coordination complex formation including benzoic acid isomers and ethanolamines (Ashurov et al., 2015 ). As a result of the presence of two spatially separated electron-donor functional groups in the MABA molecule, the reported metal complexes of this ligand are mostly coordination polymers. Polymerization may take place involving both COOH and NH₂ functional groups (Wang et al., 2004 ; Flemig et al., 2008 ; Tan et al., 2006 ; Wei et al., 2006 ; Shen & Lush, 2010 ; Wang et al., 2006 ;), or only one of them: COOH (Kozioł et al., 1992 ; Murugavel & Banerjee, 2003 ; Flemig et al., 2008; Tsaryuk et al., 2014 ) or, more infrequently, NH₂ (Wang et al., 2004).

In discrete monoligand complexes, the MABA molecules coordinate to metal ions only bidentately through the oxygen atoms of the carboxylic group (Ozhafarov et al., 1981 ) while in mixed-ligand complexes, the carboxylic group can feature mono- (Sundberg et al., 1998 ;) or bidentate (Palanisami et al., 2013 ) coordination modes. Coordination through the nitrogen atom is observed only in an Ag complex with participation of the co-ligand p-toluenesulfonate (Smith et al., 1998 ).

The disposition of MABA molecules as non-coordinating counter-ions (in their benzoate form) is characteristic for mixed-ligand Mn (Fang & Nie, 2011 ) or Cd complexes (Gao et al., 2011 ) with 4,4-bipyridine as co-ligand whereas the simultaneous presence of coordinating and non-coordinating MABA species was reported for an Mn complex with 1,10-phenanthroline as an additional ligand (Zhang, 2006 ).

Diethanolamine (DEA) ligands can coordinate to metal ions in a mono- (Petrović et al., 2006 ), bi- (Yilmaz et al., 2000 ) or tridenentate (Buvaylo et al., 2009 ) mode if two ligand molecules are situated around the central atom. However, a combination of these modes, for example, in a bi- and tridentate fashion, is also possible (Bertrand et al., 1979 ).

A search in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD; Groom & Allen, 2014 ) revealed that crystal structures have been reported for complexes of MABA and DEA with many metal ions, including zinc, copper, nickel, manganese, cadmium, cobalt, etc. However, no mixed-ligand metal complex including MABA and DEA is documented in the CSD. In order to prepare such compounds, we carried out a synthesis in a solution containing an Mn salt, MABA and DEA. Instead of the desired complex, the title salt, [Mn(C₄H₁₁NO₂)₂](C₇H₆NO₂)₂, consisting of discrete [Mn(DEA)₂]²⁺ cations and MABA⁻ anions was obtained.

2. Structural commentary

The asymmetric unit consists of one DEA ligand, one MABA⁻ anion and one Mn²⁺-ion, the latter being located on an inversion centre (Fig. 1). Coordination of the DEA ligand to the metal ion takes place in a tridentate O,N,O′ mode. The Mn—ligand bond lengths cover a range from 2.065 (2) to 2.096 (2) Å with an angular range of 81.79 (10) to 98.21 (10)°, leading to a slightly distorted MnN₂O₄ octahedron. Since the DEA ligands are in their neutral form, a charged component in the outer sphere is required for charge compensation. Hence, two MABA⁻ anions in the benzoate form are present per complex ion. The carboxylate group of the anionic molecule is tilted by 14.4 (4)° relative to the aromatic ring.

Figure 1
The structures of the molecular moieties in the title salt. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level and the asymmetric unit is identified by the numbering of its atoms.

3. Supramolecular features

The MABA⁻ anion is connected to the complex ion by a pair of rather strong O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds involving the DEA hydroxy groups [2.562 (3) and 2.611 (3) Å; Table 1], which give rise to the formation of a supramolecular motif with graph-set notation R₂²(8). The resulting supramolecular cationic:anionic 1:2 units are associated to other such units by relatively weak N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds [2.965 (4) and 3.008 (4) Å; Table 1] involving the secondary amine function of the DEA ligand and one of the H atoms of the MABA⁻ amino group; notably, the second H atom (H1B) of the amino group remains without an acceptor. These four hydrogen bonds associate the different moieties into a three-dimensional network (Fig. 2).

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
N2—H2⋯O2ⁱ	0.96 (3)	2.19 (3)	2.965 (4)	137 (3)
N1—H1A⋯O1ⁱⁱ	0.97 (2)	2.05 (2)	3.008 (4)	170 (5)
O4—H4⋯O2ⁱⁱⁱ	0.99 (5)	1.63 (5)	2.611 (3)	169 (4)
O3—H3⋯O1	0.92 (6)	1.65 (6)	2.562 (3)	173 (5)
Symmetry codes: (i) $[x-{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+1]$ ; (ii) $[x+{\script{1\over 2}}, y, -z+{\script{3\over 2}}]$ ; (iii) -x+1, -y+1, -z+1.

Figure 2
The crystal packing in the title structure. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.

4. Synthesis and crystallization

To an aqueous solution (5 ml) of MnCl₂·4H₂O (0.098 g, 0.5 mmol) was slowly added an ethanolic solution (5 ml) containing DEA (96 µl) and MABA (0.137 g, 1 mmol) under constant stirring. A light-pink crystalline product was obtained at room temperature by solvent evaporation after 20 days.

5. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. The positions of the O- and N-bound hydrogen atoms were located from difference Fourier maps. Whereas O-bound hydrogen atoms were refined freely, N-bound H atoms were refined with soft distance restraints of 0.98 Å for the secondary amine function and of 0.95 Å for the primary amine function. The C-bound hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions and refined as riding atoms with C—H = 0.93 and 0.97 Å for aromatic and methylene hydrogen atoms, respectively, and with U_iso(H) = 1.2U_eq(C).

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	[Mn(C₄H₁₁NO₂)₂](C₇H₆NO₂)₂
M_r	537.47
Crystal system, space group	Orthorhombic, Pbca
Temperature (K)	293
a, b, c (Å)	10.6120 (4), 10.8219 (4), 21.7591 (8)
V (Å³)	2498.86 (15)
Z	4
Radiation type	Cu Kα
μ (mm⁻¹)	4.76
Crystal size (mm)	0.32 × 0.20 × 0.18

Data collection
Diffractometer	Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Ruby
Absorption correction	Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009 $[Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis PRO. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, England.]$ )
T_min, T_max	0.932, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	10631, 2589, 1740
R_int	0.056
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.630

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.045, 0.136, 1.06
No. of reflections	2589
No. of parameters	180
No. of restraints	3
H-atom treatment	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.37, −0.22
Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009 $[Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis PRO. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, England.]$ ), SHELXS97, XP and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006 ).

Supporting information

CCDC reference: 1463701

Crystal structure: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989016004072/wm5277sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989016004072/wm5277Isup2.hkl

checkCIF report

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2009); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

trans-Bis(diethanolamine-κ³O,N,O')manganese(II) bis(3-aminobenzoate) top

Crystal data top

[Mn(C₄H₁₁NO₂)₂](C₇H₆NO₂)₂	D_x = 1.429 Mg m⁻³
M_r = 537.47	Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
Orthorhombic, Pbca	Cell parameters from 1995 reflections
a = 10.6120 (4) Å	θ = 4.1–75.0°
b = 10.8219 (4) Å	µ = 4.76 mm⁻¹
c = 21.7591 (8) Å	T = 293 K
V = 2498.86 (15) Å³	Block, pink
Z = 4	0.32 × 0.20 × 0.18 mm
F(000) = 1132

Data collection top

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Ruby diffractometer	2589 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed X-ray tube	1740 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 10.2576 pixels mm^-1	R_int = 0.056
ω scans	θ_max = 76.3°, θ_min = 4.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)	h = −13→11
T_min = 0.932, T_max = 1.000	k = −10→13
10631 measured reflections	l = −23→27

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full	Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.045	Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F²) = 0.136	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.06	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0511P)² + 0.8708P] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
2589 reflections	(Δ/σ)_max < 0.001
180 parameters	Δρ_max = 0.37 e Å⁻³
3 restraints	Δρ_min = −0.22 e Å⁻³

Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
Mn1	0.5000	0.5000	0.5000	0.04895 (19)
O4	0.3260 (2)	0.5819 (2)	0.52055 (10)	0.0539 (5)
O3	0.5434 (2)	0.4939 (2)	0.59247 (10)	0.0565 (5)
O1	0.7755 (2)	0.5192 (2)	0.62224 (11)	0.0632 (6)
O2	0.8300 (3)	0.3560 (3)	0.56693 (12)	0.0734 (7)
N2	0.4066 (3)	0.3381 (2)	0.52171 (12)	0.0512 (6)
C1	0.9619 (3)	0.4152 (3)	0.64986 (13)	0.0518 (7)
C2	0.9990 (3)	0.5096 (3)	0.68864 (13)	0.0516 (6)
H2A	0.9520	0.5821	0.6899	0.062*
N1	1.1449 (4)	0.5979 (4)	0.76146 (16)	0.0793 (10)
C7	0.8479 (3)	0.4310 (3)	0.60979 (14)	0.0547 (7)
C3	1.1051 (3)	0.4986 (4)	0.72582 (13)	0.0566 (7)
C6	1.0307 (3)	0.3059 (4)	0.64803 (16)	0.0617 (8)
H6	1.0069	0.2422	0.6218	0.074*
C4	1.1723 (3)	0.3888 (4)	0.72398 (15)	0.0659 (9)
H4A	1.2432	0.3795	0.7487	0.079*
C11	0.2710 (3)	0.3669 (3)	0.53064 (17)	0.0618 (8)
H11A	0.2348	0.3081	0.5592	0.074*
H11B	0.2272	0.3586	0.4917	0.074*
C5	1.1356 (3)	0.2928 (4)	0.68595 (16)	0.0682 (9)
H5	1.1811	0.2193	0.6857	0.082*
C10	0.2524 (4)	0.4967 (3)	0.55517 (17)	0.0657 (9)
H10A	0.1640	0.5191	0.5525	0.079*
H10B	0.2772	0.4999	0.5980	0.079*
C9	0.4717 (4)	0.2849 (3)	0.57585 (18)	0.0690 (10)
H9A	0.5494	0.2457	0.5628	0.083*
H9B	0.4187	0.2222	0.5944	0.083*
C8	0.5008 (4)	0.3832 (4)	0.62248 (16)	0.0724 (10)
H8A	0.4259	0.4010	0.6464	0.087*
H8B	0.5656	0.3537	0.6503	0.087*
H4	0.276 (5)	0.606 (5)	0.484 (2)	0.099 (15)*
H2	0.429 (4)	0.278 (3)	0.4912 (14)	0.071 (11)*
H3	0.628 (6)	0.501 (5)	0.600 (3)	0.109 (18)*
H1A	1.196 (5)	0.571 (6)	0.7962 (18)	0.13 (2)*
H1B	1.087 (6)	0.664 (5)	0.771 (3)	0.18 (3)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
Mn1	0.0487 (3)	0.0479 (3)	0.0503 (3)	−0.0033 (3)	−0.0032 (3)	−0.0027 (3)
O4	0.0536 (11)	0.0496 (11)	0.0586 (12)	0.0035 (10)	−0.0011 (10)	−0.0037 (10)
O3	0.0553 (12)	0.0658 (14)	0.0485 (10)	−0.0038 (11)	−0.0093 (9)	−0.0029 (11)
O1	0.0529 (12)	0.0758 (16)	0.0608 (12)	0.0082 (11)	−0.0109 (10)	−0.0144 (12)
O2	0.0762 (16)	0.0790 (17)	0.0650 (14)	0.0167 (14)	−0.0226 (12)	−0.0215 (13)
N2	0.0540 (14)	0.0457 (13)	0.0539 (13)	−0.0065 (11)	0.0018 (11)	−0.0061 (11)
C1	0.0494 (15)	0.0631 (18)	0.0429 (13)	−0.0042 (14)	0.0023 (12)	0.0026 (14)
C2	0.0465 (14)	0.0632 (17)	0.0452 (13)	−0.0017 (14)	0.0025 (11)	0.0061 (14)
N1	0.077 (2)	0.094 (3)	0.0674 (19)	−0.014 (2)	−0.0126 (16)	−0.0015 (19)
C7	0.0504 (16)	0.064 (2)	0.0496 (16)	−0.0016 (15)	−0.0012 (12)	−0.0024 (14)
C3	0.0520 (16)	0.073 (2)	0.0448 (13)	−0.0117 (16)	0.0003 (12)	0.0032 (16)
C6	0.067 (2)	0.065 (2)	0.0535 (16)	0.0017 (17)	−0.0015 (14)	−0.0011 (16)
C4	0.0520 (17)	0.094 (3)	0.0522 (17)	0.0043 (19)	−0.0040 (14)	0.0079 (18)
C11	0.0559 (19)	0.0569 (18)	0.073 (2)	−0.0107 (15)	0.0060 (15)	−0.0005 (16)
C5	0.063 (2)	0.079 (2)	0.0622 (19)	0.0150 (18)	−0.0014 (15)	0.0056 (18)
C10	0.0606 (19)	0.066 (2)	0.071 (2)	0.0055 (18)	0.0172 (16)	0.0018 (19)
C9	0.077 (2)	0.0563 (19)	0.074 (2)	−0.0046 (17)	−0.0092 (18)	0.0154 (17)
C8	0.076 (2)	0.088 (3)	0.0533 (18)	−0.014 (2)	−0.0086 (17)	0.0136 (19)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

Mn1—O3ⁱ	2.065 (2)	N1—C3	1.391 (5)
Mn1—O3	2.065 (2)	N1—H1A	0.97 (2)
Mn1—N2	2.067 (3)	N1—H1B	0.97 (2)
Mn1—N2ⁱ	2.068 (3)	C3—C4	1.387 (5)
Mn1—O4	2.096 (2)	C6—C5	1.393 (5)
Mn1—O4ⁱ	2.096 (2)	C6—H6	0.9300
O4—C10	1.424 (4)	C4—C5	1.384 (6)
O4—H4	0.99 (5)	C4—H4A	0.9300
O3—C8	1.438 (4)	C11—C10	1.515 (5)
O3—H3	0.92 (6)	C11—H11A	0.9700
O1—C7	1.255 (4)	C11—H11B	0.9700
O2—C7	1.251 (4)	C5—H5	0.9300
N2—C9	1.482 (4)	C10—H10A	0.9700
N2—C11	1.485 (4)	C10—H10B	0.9700
N2—H2	0.959 (19)	C9—C8	1.502 (5)
C1—C2	1.383 (5)	C9—H9A	0.9700
C1—C6	1.390 (5)	C9—H9B	0.9700
C1—C7	1.501 (4)	C8—H8A	0.9700
C2—C3	1.391 (4)	C8—H8B	0.9700
C2—H2A	0.9300

O3ⁱ—Mn1—O3	180.00 (14)	O1—C7—C1	117.0 (3)
O3ⁱ—Mn1—N2	98.21 (10)	C4—C3—N1	121.5 (3)
O3—Mn1—N2	81.79 (10)	C4—C3—C2	118.2 (3)
O3ⁱ—Mn1—N2ⁱ	81.79 (10)	N1—C3—C2	120.3 (4)
O3—Mn1—N2ⁱ	98.21 (10)	C1—C6—C5	119.3 (4)
N2—Mn1—N2ⁱ	180.0	C1—C6—H6	120.4
O3ⁱ—Mn1—O4	89.88 (9)	C5—C6—H6	120.4
O3—Mn1—O4	90.12 (9)	C5—C4—C3	121.1 (3)
N2—Mn1—O4	83.54 (10)	C5—C4—H4A	119.5
N2ⁱ—Mn1—O4	96.46 (10)	C3—C4—H4A	119.5
O3ⁱ—Mn1—O4ⁱ	90.11 (9)	N2—C11—C10	111.6 (3)
O3—Mn1—O4ⁱ	89.89 (9)	N2—C11—H11A	109.3
N2—Mn1—O4ⁱ	96.47 (10)	C10—C11—H11A	109.3
N2ⁱ—Mn1—O4ⁱ	83.53 (10)	N2—C11—H11B	109.3
O4—Mn1—O4ⁱ	180.0	C10—C11—H11B	109.3
C10—O4—Mn1	108.80 (19)	H11A—C11—H11B	108.0
C10—O4—H4	107 (3)	C4—C5—C6	120.2 (4)
Mn1—O4—H4	115 (3)	C4—C5—H5	119.9
C8—O3—Mn1	113.5 (2)	C6—C5—H5	119.9
C8—O3—H3	108 (3)	O4—C10—C11	110.0 (3)
Mn1—O3—H3	113 (4)	O4—C10—H10A	109.7
C9—N2—C11	115.4 (3)	C11—C10—H10A	109.7
C9—N2—Mn1	106.7 (2)	O4—C10—H10B	109.7
C11—N2—Mn1	108.5 (2)	C11—C10—H10B	109.7
C9—N2—H2	100 (2)	H10A—C10—H10B	108.2
C11—N2—H2	118 (3)	N2—C9—C8	110.9 (3)
Mn1—N2—H2	108 (2)	N2—C9—H9A	109.4
C2—C1—C6	119.8 (3)	C8—C9—H9A	109.4
C2—C1—C7	120.0 (3)	N2—C9—H9B	109.4
C6—C1—C7	120.2 (3)	C8—C9—H9B	109.4
C1—C2—C3	121.5 (3)	H9A—C9—H9B	108.0
C1—C2—H2A	119.3	O3—C8—C9	110.4 (3)
C3—C2—H2A	119.3	O3—C8—H8A	109.6
C3—N1—H1A	112 (4)	C9—C8—H8A	109.6
C3—N1—H1B	119 (5)	O3—C8—H8B	109.6
H1A—N1—H1B	114 (5)	C9—C8—H8B	109.6
O2—C7—O1	124.2 (3)	H8A—C8—H8B	108.1
O2—C7—C1	118.8 (3)

C6—C1—C2—C3	0.7 (5)	C2—C3—C4—C5	0.4 (5)
C7—C1—C2—C3	−179.2 (3)	C9—N2—C11—C10	88.9 (4)
C2—C1—C7—O2	166.2 (3)	Mn1—N2—C11—C10	−30.7 (3)
C6—C1—C7—O2	−13.6 (5)	C3—C4—C5—C6	0.9 (6)
C2—C1—C7—O1	−14.4 (5)	C1—C6—C5—C4	−1.4 (5)
C6—C1—C7—O1	165.7 (3)	Mn1—O4—C10—C11	−38.9 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4	−1.2 (5)	N2—C11—C10—O4	47.5 (4)
C1—C2—C3—N1	175.9 (3)	C11—N2—C9—C8	−76.9 (4)
C2—C1—C6—C5	0.7 (5)	Mn1—N2—C9—C8	43.7 (4)
C7—C1—C6—C5	−179.5 (3)	Mn1—O3—C8—C9	17.4 (4)
N1—C3—C4—C5	−176.6 (3)	N2—C9—C8—O3	−40.8 (4)

Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
N2—H2···O2ⁱⁱ	0.96 (3)	2.19 (3)	2.965 (4)	137 (3)
N1—H1A···O1ⁱⁱⁱ	0.97 (2)	2.05 (2)	3.008 (4)	170 (5)
O4—H4···O2ⁱ	0.99 (5)	1.63 (5)	2.611 (3)	169 (4)
O3—H3···O1	0.92 (6)	1.65 (6)	2.562 (3)	173 (5)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) x−1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1; (iii) x+1/2, y, −z+3/2.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Grant for Fundamental Research from the Center of Science and Technology, Uzbekistan (No. FPFI T.2–16).

References

Ashurov, J. M., Ibragimov, A. B. & Ibragimov, B. T. (2015). Polyhedron, 102, 441–446. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bertrand, J. A., Fujita, E. & VanDerveer, D. G. (1979). Inorg. Chem. 18, 230–233. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Buvaylo, E. A., Kokozay, V. N., Vassilyeva, O. Yu., Skelton, B. W. & Jezierska, J. (2009). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 362, 2429–2434. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Fang, Z. & Nie, Q. (2011). J. Coord. Chem. 64, 2573–2582. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Flemig, H., Pantenburg, I. & Meyer, G. (2008). J. Alloys Compd. 451, 429–432. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Gao, J., Wang, J. & Nie, J. (2011). Acta Cryst. C67, m181–m184. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Groom, C. R. & Allen, F. H. (2014). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 662–671. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kozioł, A. E., Klimek, B., Stępniak, K., Rzączyńska, Z., Brzvska, W., Bodak, O. I., Akselrud, L. G., Pavlyuk, V. V. & Tafeenko, V. A. (1992). Z. Kristallogr. 200, 25–33. Google Scholar
Macrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453–457. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Murugavel, R. & Banerjee, S. (2003). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 6, 810–814. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Oxford Diffraction (2009). CrysAlis PRO. Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, England. Google Scholar
Ozhafarov, N. Kh., Amiraslanov, I. R., Nadzhafov, G. N., Movsumov, E. M. & Mamedov, Kh. S. (1981). Zh. Strukt. Khim. 22, 121–122. Google Scholar
Palanisami, N., Rajakannu, P. & Murugavel, R. (2013). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 405, 522–531. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Petrović, Z. D., Djuran, M. I., Heinemann, F. W., Rajković, S. & Trifunović, S. R. (2006). Bioorg. Chem. 34, 225–234. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Shen, F. M. & Lush, S. F. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, m1427. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Smith, G., Cloutt, B. A., Lynch, D. E., Byriel, K. A. & Kennard, C. H. L. (1998). Inorg. Chem. 37, 3236–3242. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sundberg, M. R., Koskimies, J. K., Matikainen, J. & Tylli, H. (1998). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 268, 21–30. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Tan, A.-Z., Wei, Y.-H., Chen, Z.-L., Liang, F.-P. & Hu, R.-X. (2006). Wuji Huaxue Xuebao, 22, 394–398. CAS Google Scholar
Tsaryuk, V., Vologzhanina, A., Zhuravlev, K., Kudryashova, V., Szostak, R. & Zolin, V. (2014). J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 285, 52–61. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wang, R., Hong, M., Luo, J., Jiang, F., Han, L., Lin, Z. & Cao, R. (2004). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 357, 103–114. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wang, R., Yuan, D., Jiang, F., Han, L., Gao, S. & Hong, M. (2006). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 1649–1656. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Wei, Y.-H., Tan, A.-Z., Chen, Z.-L., Liang, F., -, P. & Hu, R.-X. (2006). Jiegou Huaxue, 25, 343–348. CAS Google Scholar
Yilmaz, V. T., Karadag, A., Thöne, C. & Herbst-Irmer, R. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, 948–949. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Zhang, W.-Z. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, m857–m859. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.