research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 72| Part 5| May 2016| Pages 730-733

Two ortho­rhom­bic polymorphs of hydro­morphone

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg

aCrystallics B.V., Meibergdreef 31, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands, bNoramco Inc., 503 Carr Rd, Suite 200, Wilmington, DE 19809, USA, and cNoramco Inc., 1440 Olympic Drive, Athens, GA 30601, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: jaroslaw.mazurek@crystallics.com

Edited by M. Gdaniec, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland (Received 23 March 2016; accepted 18 April 2016; online 26 April 2016)

Conditions to obtain two polymorphic forms by crystallization from solution were determined for the analgesic drug hydro­morphone [C17H19NO3; systematic name: (4R,4aR,7aR,12bS)-9-hy­droxy-3-methyl-1,2,4,4a,5,6,7a,13-octa­hydro-4,12-methano­benzofuro[3,2-e]iso­quinolin-7-one]. These two crystalline forms, designated as I and II, belong to the P212121 ortho­rhom­bic space group. In both polymorphs, the hydro­morphone mol­ecules adopt very similar conformations with some small differences observed only in the N-methyl amine part of the mol­ecule. The crystal structures of both polymorphs feature chains of mol­ecules connected by hydrogen bonds; however, in form I this inter­action occurs between the hydroxyl group and the tertiary amine N atom whereas in form II the hydroxyl group acts as a donor of a hydrogen bond to the O atom from the cyclic ether part.

1. Chemical context

Drug polymorphism has been the subject of hundreds of publications and numerous excellent reviews (Byrn et al., 1999[Byrn, S. R., Pfeiffer, R. R. & Stowell, J. G. (1999). In Solid-State Chemistry of Drugs. West Lafayette, Indiana: Ssci Inc.]; Grant, 1999[Grant, D. J. (1999). Drugs Pharm. Sci. 95, 1-33.]; Singhal & Curatolo, 2004[Singhal, D. & Curatolo, W. (2004). Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 56, 335-347.]; Vippagunta et al., 2001[Vippagunta, S. R., Brittain, H. G. & Grant, D. J. (2001). Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 48, 3-26.]). It is well established that polymorphs with different stability may have different solubility and dissolution rates, which can affect the bioavailability. The semi-synthetic opiate drug hydro­morphone is a potent derivative of morphine and despite poor bioavailability (Parab et al., 1988[Parab, P. V., Ritschel, W. A., Coyle, D. E., Gregg, R. V. & Denson, D. D. (1988). Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 9, 187-199.]) is commonly used to treat moderate to severe pain in the treatment of cancer (Sarhill et al., 2001[Sarhill, N., Walsh, D. & Nelson, K. A. (2001). Support. Care Cancer, 9, 84-96.]). To improve bioavailability of this compound a polymorph screen was performed that resulted in two solvent-free forms, designated as form I and form II.

[Scheme 1]

2. Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of hydro­morphone in both polymorphs is nearly identical (Fig. 1[link]) with some deviations found only for the N-methyl amine part of the piperidine fragment (Fig. 2[link]). For example the C10—C11—N12—C13 torsion angle is 178.5 (2)° for form I and 169.5 (2)° for form II. The adopted conformation is similar to the conformation observed for morphine (Bye, 1976[Bye, E. (1976). Acta Chem. Scand. Ser. B, 30, 549-554.]; Scheins et al., 2005[Scheins, S., Messerschmidt, M. & Luger, P. (2005). Acta Cryst. B61, 443-448.]).

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Mol­ecular structure and atom-numbering scheme for hydro­morphone in the crystals of form I (left) and form II (right). Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Superposition of the hydro­morphone mol­ecules from two polymorphic forms (red form I, blue form II) generated by fitting of the aromatic ring.

3. Supra­molecular features

Although both polymorphs crystallize in the same space group P212121 with the same number of mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, they differ significantly in the packing features (Figs. 3[link] and 4[link]). In form I, the hydrogen-bonded mol­ecules are arranged into chains that run along the a axis with adjacent mol­ecules in the chain related by translation. The hydroxyl group donates a hydrogen atom which is accepted by the free electron pair of the N atom (Fig. 5[link], Table 1[link]). In the crystals of form II, inter­molecular hydrogen bonds also generate a chain of mol­ecules that propagates along the a axis; however, adjacent mol­ecules along this chain are related by a 21 symmetry axis. The mol­ecules are connected by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl group as donor and the etheric O atom as acceptor (Table 2[link]). These chains form a zigzag pattern, as illustrated in Fig. 6[link]. The packing arrangement of mol­ecules in form II is more dense than in polymorph I, as indicated by the Kitajgorodskij (1973[Kitajgorodskij, A. I. (1973). In Molecular Crystals and Molecules. New York: Academic Press.]) packing coefficients of 0.71 and 0.69, respectively.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (I)[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1A⋯N12i 0.91 (4) 1.89 (4) 2.796 (3) 171 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z.

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (II)[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O4i 0.84 (3) 1.96 (3) 2.791 (2) 167 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) [x+{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{3\over 2}}, -z+1].
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Crystal packing diagram of form I, viewed along the a axis. Hydrogen bonds are shown as blue lines.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Crystal packing diagram of form II, viewed along the a axis. Hydrogen bonds are shown as blue lines.
[Figure 5]
Figure 5
The chain of mol­ecules running along the a axis formed by O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds in form I.
[Figure 6]
Figure 6
The zigzag chain of mol­ecules running along the a axis formed by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds in form II.

4. Synthesis and crystallization

10.8 mg of hydro­morphone was dissolved in 1.8 mL THF/acetone (1/1, v/v) and left to evaporate slowly under ambient conditions. After several days, colorless prism-like crystals of form I (m.p. 549.8 K) appeared that were used for diffraction studies. Crystals of form II were obtained in the following way: 19.7 mg of hydro­morphone was suspended in 0.3 mL of 50/50 mixture of ethanol and toluene. The suspension was heated to 333 K and stirred for about one h until it became clear. Subsequently, the vial was cooled rapidly to 278 K and colorless block-like crystals (m.p. 550.2 K) precipitated that were used for diffraction studies.

5. Refinement

The H atoms from the methyl group in form II were included from geometry and their isotropic displacement parameters refined. The remaining H atoms were found in a Fourier difference map and freely refined. The absolute configuration of hydro­morphone was known from the synthetic route. In the absence of significant anomalous scattering effects, Friedel pairs were merged. Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3[link].

Table 3
Experimental details

  (I) (II)
Crystal data
Chemical formula C17H19NO3 C17H19NO3
Mr 285.33 285.33
Crystal system, space group Orthorhombic, P212121 Orthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K) 296 296
a, b, c (Å) 8.9497 (6), 11.0906 (6), 14.2608 (9) 8.8802 (6), 10.6208 (8), 14.4733 (9)
V3) 1415.49 (15) 1365.05 (16)
Z 4 4
Radiation type Mo Kα Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.09 0.10
Crystal size (mm) 0.35 × 0.35 × 0.30 0.40 × 0.32 × 0.22
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker KappaCCD Bruker KappaCCD
Absorption correction
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 7054, 3427, 3088 15227, 4920, 4693
Rint 0.031 0.022
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.671 0.758
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.042, 0.096, 1.05 0.033, 0.095, 1.07
No. of reflections 3427 4920
No. of parameters 266 257
H-atom treatment All H-atom parameters refined H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.19, −0.17 0.27, −0.12
Computer programs: COLLECT (Hooft, 1998[Hooft, R. W. W. (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.]), HKL DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997[Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307-326. New York: Academic Press.]), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3-8.]), SHELXL2014/7 (Sheldrick, 2015b[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3-8.]), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006[Macrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453-457.]) and enCIFer (Allen et al., 2004[Allen, F. H., Johnson, O., Shields, G. P., Smith, B. R. & Towler, M. (2004). J. Appl. Cryst. 37, 335-338.]).

Supporting information


Chemical context top

Drug polymorphism has been the subject of hundreds of publications and numerous excellent reviews (Byrn et al., 1999; Grant, 1999; Singhal & Curatolo, 2004; Vippagunta et al., 2001). It is well established that polymorphs with different stability may have different solubility and dissolution rates, which can affect the bioavailability. The semi-synthetic opiate drug hydro­morphone is a potent derivative of morphine and despite poor bioavailability (Parab et al., 1988) is commonly used to treat moderate to severe pain in the treatment of cancer (Sarhill et al., 2001). To improve bioavailability of this compound a polymorph screen was performed that resulted in two solvent-free forms, designated as form I and form II.

Structural commentary top

The molecular structure of hydro­morphone in both polymorphs is nearly identical (Fig. 1) with some deviations found only for the N-methyl amine part of the piperidine fragment (Fig. 2). For example the C10—C11—N12—C13 torsion angle is 178.5 (2)° for form I and 169.5 (2)° for form II. The adopted conformation is similar to the conformation observed for morphine (Bye, 1976; Scheins et al., 2005).

Supra­molecular features top

Although both polymorphs crystallize in the same space group P212121 with the same number of molecules in the asymmetric unit, they differ significantly in the packing features (Fig. 3 and 4). In form I, the hydrogen-bonded molecules are arranged into chains that run along the a axis with adjacent molecules in the chain related by translation. The hydroxyl group donates a hydrogen atom which is accepted by the free electron pair of the N atom (Fig. 5, Table 1). In the crystals of form II, inter­molecular hydrogen bonds also generate a chain of molecules that propagates along the a axis; however, adjacent molecules along this chain are related by a 21 symmetry axis. The molecules are connected by O—H···O hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl group as donor and the etheric O atom as acceptor (Table 2). These chains form a zigzag pattern, as illustrated in Fig. 6. The packing arrangement of molecules in form II is more dense than in polymorph I, as indicated by the Kitajgorodskij (1973) packing coefficients of 0.71 and 0.69, respectively.

Synthesis and crystallization top

10.8 mg of hydro­morphone was dissolved in 1.8 mL THF/acetone (1/1, v/v) and left to evaporate slowly under ambient conditions. After several days, colorless prism-like crystals of form I (m.p. 549.8 K) appeared that were used for diffraction studies. Crystals of form II were obtained in the following way: 19.7 mg of hydro­morphone was suspended in 0.3 mL of 50/50 mixture of ethanol and toluene. The suspension was heated to 333 K and stirred for about one hour until it became clear. Subsequently, the vial was cooled rapidly to 278 K and colorless block-like crystals (m.p. 550.2 K) precipitated that were used for diffraction studies.

Refinement top

The H atoms from the methyl group in form II were included from geometry and their isotropic displacement parameters refined. The remaining H atoms were found in a Fourier difference map and freely refined. The absolute configuration of hydro­morphone was known from the synthetic route. In the absence of significant anomalous scattering effects, Friedel pairs were merged. Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3.

Structure description top

Drug polymorphism has been the subject of hundreds of publications and numerous excellent reviews (Byrn et al., 1999; Grant, 1999; Singhal & Curatolo, 2004; Vippagunta et al., 2001). It is well established that polymorphs with different stability may have different solubility and dissolution rates, which can affect the bioavailability. The semi-synthetic opiate drug hydro­morphone is a potent derivative of morphine and despite poor bioavailability (Parab et al., 1988) is commonly used to treat moderate to severe pain in the treatment of cancer (Sarhill et al., 2001). To improve bioavailability of this compound a polymorph screen was performed that resulted in two solvent-free forms, designated as form I and form II.

The molecular structure of hydro­morphone in both polymorphs is nearly identical (Fig. 1) with some deviations found only for the N-methyl amine part of the piperidine fragment (Fig. 2). For example the C10—C11—N12—C13 torsion angle is 178.5 (2)° for form I and 169.5 (2)° for form II. The adopted conformation is similar to the conformation observed for morphine (Bye, 1976; Scheins et al., 2005).

Although both polymorphs crystallize in the same space group P212121 with the same number of molecules in the asymmetric unit, they differ significantly in the packing features (Fig. 3 and 4). In form I, the hydrogen-bonded molecules are arranged into chains that run along the a axis with adjacent molecules in the chain related by translation. The hydroxyl group donates a hydrogen atom which is accepted by the free electron pair of the N atom (Fig. 5, Table 1). In the crystals of form II, inter­molecular hydrogen bonds also generate a chain of molecules that propagates along the a axis; however, adjacent molecules along this chain are related by a 21 symmetry axis. The molecules are connected by O—H···O hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl group as donor and the etheric O atom as acceptor (Table 2). These chains form a zigzag pattern, as illustrated in Fig. 6. The packing arrangement of molecules in form II is more dense than in polymorph I, as indicated by the Kitajgorodskij (1973) packing coefficients of 0.71 and 0.69, respectively.

Synthesis and crystallization top

10.8 mg of hydro­morphone was dissolved in 1.8 mL THF/acetone (1/1, v/v) and left to evaporate slowly under ambient conditions. After several days, colorless prism-like crystals of form I (m.p. 549.8 K) appeared that were used for diffraction studies. Crystals of form II were obtained in the following way: 19.7 mg of hydro­morphone was suspended in 0.3 mL of 50/50 mixture of ethanol and toluene. The suspension was heated to 333 K and stirred for about one hour until it became clear. Subsequently, the vial was cooled rapidly to 278 K and colorless block-like crystals (m.p. 550.2 K) precipitated that were used for diffraction studies.

Refinement details top

The H atoms from the methyl group in form II were included from geometry and their isotropic displacement parameters refined. The remaining H atoms were found in a Fourier difference map and freely refined. The absolute configuration of hydro­morphone was known from the synthetic route. In the absence of significant anomalous scattering effects, Friedel pairs were merged. Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3.

Computing details top

For both compounds, data collection: COLLECT (Hooft, 1998). Cell refinement: SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) for (I); HKL SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) for (II). Data reduction: DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) for (I); HKL DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997) for (II). For both compounds, program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014/7 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: enCIFer (Allen et al., 2004).

Figures top
[Figure 1] Fig. 1. Molecular structure and atom-numbering scheme for hydromorphone in the crystals of form I (left) and form II (right). Displacement ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2] Fig. 2. Superposition of the hydromorphone molecules from two polymorphic forms (red form I, blue form II) generated by fitting of the aromatic ring.
[Figure 3] Fig. 3. Crystal packing diagram of form I, viewed along the a axis. Hydrogen bonds are shown as blue lines.
[Figure 4] Fig. 4. Crystal packing diagram of form II, viewed along the a axis. Hydrogen bonds are shown as blue lines.
[Figure 5] Fig. 5. The chain of molecules running along the a axis formed by O—H···N hydrogen bonds in form I.
[Figure 6] Fig. 6. The zigzag chain of molecules running along the a axis formed by O—H···O hydrogen bonds in form II.
(I) (4R,4aR,7aR,12bS)-9-Hydroxy-3-methyl-1,2,4,4a,5,6,7a,13-octahydro-4,12-methanobenzofuro[3,2-e]isoquinolin-7-one] top
Crystal data top
C17H19NO3Dx = 1.339 Mg m3
Mr = 285.33Melting point < 549.8 K
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 8.9497 (6) ÅCell parameters from 9169 reflections
b = 11.0906 (6) Åθ = 1.0–32.6°
c = 14.2608 (9) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
V = 1415.49 (15) Å3T = 296 K
Z = 4Prism, colorless
F(000) = 6080.35 × 0.35 × 0.30 mm
Data collection top
Bruker KappaCCD
diffractometer
3088 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.031
Horizonally mounted graphite crystal monochromatorθmax = 28.5°, θmin = 3.4°
CCD scansh = 1111
7054 measured reflectionsk = 1114
3427 independent reflectionsl = 1719
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
wR(F2) = 0.096All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.05 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0361P)2 + 0.2726P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
3427 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.005
266 parametersΔρmax = 0.19 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.17 e Å3
Crystal data top
C17H19NO3V = 1415.49 (15) Å3
Mr = 285.33Z = 4
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation
a = 8.9497 (6) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
b = 11.0906 (6) ÅT = 296 K
c = 14.2608 (9) Å0.35 × 0.35 × 0.30 mm
Data collection top
Bruker KappaCCD
diffractometer
3088 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
7054 measured reflectionsRint = 0.031
3427 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0420 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.096All H-atom parameters refined
S = 1.05Δρmax = 0.19 e Å3
3427 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.17 e Å3
266 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.91711 (18)0.7664 (2)0.17051 (12)0.0513 (5)
H1A0.993 (4)0.774 (3)0.213 (2)0.069 (10)*
C20.7893 (2)0.7337 (2)0.21531 (15)0.0337 (4)
C30.6543 (2)0.73164 (19)0.16755 (13)0.0318 (4)
O40.63079 (17)0.74990 (16)0.07223 (10)0.0409 (4)
C50.4813 (3)0.7006 (2)0.05538 (15)0.0369 (5)
H5A0.439 (3)0.745 (2)0.0007 (18)0.034 (6)*
C60.4906 (3)0.5664 (3)0.03355 (16)0.0455 (6)
O70.6063 (3)0.5185 (2)0.00966 (16)0.0692 (6)
C80.3484 (4)0.4980 (3)0.0485 (2)0.0555 (7)
H8A0.362 (4)0.413 (3)0.031 (2)0.073 (10)*
H8B0.271 (4)0.541 (3)0.006 (2)0.063 (9)*
C90.3038 (3)0.5078 (2)0.1523 (2)0.0464 (6)
H9A0.387 (4)0.480 (3)0.193 (2)0.057 (8)*
H9B0.220 (3)0.455 (3)0.166 (2)0.055 (8)*
C100.2671 (2)0.6384 (2)0.17446 (16)0.0334 (4)
H10A0.175 (3)0.660 (2)0.1390 (16)0.034 (6)*
C110.2315 (2)0.6636 (2)0.27875 (16)0.0365 (5)
H11A0.147 (3)0.610 (2)0.2993 (18)0.043 (7)*
N120.1698 (2)0.78799 (19)0.28457 (13)0.0381 (4)
C130.1274 (3)0.8219 (3)0.3807 (2)0.0555 (7)
H13A0.072 (4)0.750 (3)0.410 (2)0.068 (9)*
H13B0.216 (4)0.844 (3)0.417 (2)0.054 (8)*
H13C0.060 (4)0.893 (3)0.373 (2)0.073 (10)*
C140.2738 (3)0.8808 (2)0.24843 (19)0.0426 (6)
H14A0.221 (3)0.956 (3)0.251 (2)0.051 (8)*
H14B0.359 (3)0.888 (2)0.291 (2)0.046 (7)*
C150.3324 (3)0.8528 (2)0.15154 (17)0.0377 (5)
H15A0.251 (3)0.862 (3)0.105 (2)0.048 (7)*
H15B0.414 (3)0.912 (2)0.1341 (18)0.043 (7)*
C160.3942 (2)0.72389 (19)0.14723 (13)0.0291 (4)
C170.5225 (2)0.70844 (19)0.21381 (14)0.0289 (4)
C180.5145 (2)0.6740 (2)0.30675 (14)0.0315 (4)
C190.3642 (2)0.6356 (3)0.34492 (17)0.0417 (5)
H19A0.364 (3)0.548 (3)0.356 (2)0.058 (9)*
H19B0.341 (3)0.672 (3)0.406 (2)0.058 (8)*
C200.6499 (2)0.6686 (2)0.35428 (14)0.0335 (4)
H20A0.655 (3)0.640 (2)0.4198 (18)0.039 (6)*
C210.7821 (2)0.6994 (2)0.30952 (15)0.0350 (5)
H21A0.871 (3)0.693 (2)0.3430 (17)0.038 (6)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0239 (8)0.0907 (15)0.0393 (9)0.0080 (8)0.0014 (7)0.0059 (9)
C20.0235 (9)0.0427 (12)0.0349 (10)0.0002 (9)0.0009 (8)0.0005 (9)
C30.0293 (10)0.0393 (11)0.0269 (9)0.0021 (8)0.0004 (8)0.0035 (8)
O40.0315 (8)0.0656 (11)0.0256 (7)0.0051 (7)0.0000 (6)0.0068 (7)
C50.0321 (10)0.0511 (13)0.0276 (9)0.0006 (10)0.0047 (9)0.0035 (9)
C60.0490 (14)0.0573 (15)0.0301 (10)0.0061 (12)0.0004 (11)0.0045 (10)
O70.0662 (14)0.0728 (14)0.0687 (14)0.0171 (11)0.0256 (11)0.0007 (11)
C80.0547 (16)0.0505 (16)0.0615 (17)0.0015 (14)0.0071 (14)0.0212 (14)
C90.0390 (13)0.0362 (12)0.0640 (16)0.0067 (10)0.0001 (12)0.0024 (11)
C100.0262 (9)0.0360 (11)0.0380 (11)0.0030 (8)0.0044 (9)0.0015 (9)
C110.0257 (10)0.0438 (12)0.0398 (11)0.0059 (9)0.0004 (9)0.0046 (10)
N120.0266 (8)0.0487 (11)0.0389 (9)0.0015 (8)0.0005 (8)0.0058 (8)
C130.0374 (13)0.084 (2)0.0448 (14)0.0071 (15)0.0034 (12)0.0195 (14)
C140.0357 (12)0.0383 (13)0.0536 (14)0.0002 (10)0.0000 (11)0.0055 (10)
C150.0339 (11)0.0353 (11)0.0438 (12)0.0003 (9)0.0037 (10)0.0064 (9)
C160.0257 (9)0.0340 (10)0.0275 (9)0.0015 (8)0.0034 (8)0.0024 (8)
C170.0247 (9)0.0340 (10)0.0281 (9)0.0015 (8)0.0033 (8)0.0024 (8)
C180.0281 (9)0.0391 (11)0.0274 (9)0.0019 (8)0.0000 (8)0.0040 (8)
C190.0291 (11)0.0599 (15)0.0363 (12)0.0029 (10)0.0027 (10)0.0144 (11)
C200.0335 (11)0.0414 (11)0.0256 (9)0.0002 (9)0.0037 (8)0.0035 (8)
C210.0260 (9)0.0441 (12)0.0350 (10)0.0003 (9)0.0074 (9)0.0006 (9)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C21.360 (3)C11—C191.548 (3)
O1—H1A0.91 (4)C11—H11A1.01 (3)
C2—C31.387 (3)N12—C131.472 (3)
C2—C211.398 (3)N12—C141.480 (3)
C3—C171.376 (3)C13—H13A1.03 (4)
C3—O41.390 (2)C13—H13B0.98 (3)
O4—C51.465 (3)C13—H13C1.00 (4)
C5—C61.523 (4)C14—C151.510 (3)
C5—C161.546 (3)C14—H14A0.96 (3)
C5—H5A1.00 (3)C14—H14B0.98 (3)
C6—O71.212 (3)C15—C161.534 (3)
C6—C81.498 (4)C15—H15A0.99 (3)
C8—C91.537 (4)C15—H15B1.01 (3)
C8—H8A0.99 (3)C16—C171.500 (3)
C8—H8B1.03 (3)C17—C181.381 (3)
C9—C101.519 (3)C18—C201.390 (3)
C9—H9A1.00 (3)C18—C191.512 (3)
C9—H9B0.97 (3)C19—H19A0.99 (3)
C10—C161.531 (3)C19—H19B0.98 (3)
C10—C111.546 (3)C20—C211.387 (3)
C10—H10A1.00 (2)C20—H20A0.99 (3)
C11—N121.488 (3)C21—H21A0.93 (3)
C2—O1—H1A110 (2)C14—N12—C11113.08 (18)
O1—C2—C3120.43 (18)N12—C13—H13A108.1 (19)
O1—C2—C21124.26 (19)N12—C13—H13B110.6 (17)
C3—C2—C21115.31 (18)H13A—C13—H13B111 (3)
C17—C3—C2120.96 (17)N12—C13—H13C105 (2)
C17—C3—O4111.48 (17)H13A—C13—H13C111 (3)
C2—C3—O4127.56 (18)H13B—C13—H13C110 (3)
C3—O4—C5104.13 (15)N12—C14—C15113.2 (2)
O4—C5—C6110.4 (2)N12—C14—H14A106.6 (17)
O4—C5—C16105.03 (16)C15—C14—H14A112.8 (17)
C6—C5—C16111.35 (19)N12—C14—H14B109.2 (16)
O4—C5—H5A106.7 (14)C15—C14—H14B108.4 (16)
C6—C5—H5A110.2 (14)H14A—C14—H14B106 (2)
C16—C5—H5A113.0 (14)C14—C15—C16110.72 (18)
O7—C6—C8122.9 (3)C14—C15—H15A109.5 (16)
O7—C6—C5122.2 (3)C16—C15—H15A109.6 (17)
C8—C6—C5114.8 (2)C14—C15—H15B110.0 (15)
C6—C8—C9108.8 (2)C16—C15—H15B109.6 (15)
C6—C8—H8A110 (2)H15A—C15—H15B107 (2)
C9—C8—H8A110 (2)C17—C16—C10109.73 (16)
C6—C8—H8B104.6 (18)C17—C16—C15110.92 (17)
C9—C8—H8B110.7 (18)C10—C16—C15107.40 (17)
H8A—C8—H8B112 (3)C17—C16—C597.53 (16)
C10—C9—C8108.9 (2)C10—C16—C5119.10 (18)
C10—C9—H9A109.6 (18)C15—C16—C5111.80 (17)
C8—C9—H9A110.5 (18)C3—C17—C18123.80 (18)
C10—C9—H9B111.4 (18)C3—C17—C16109.37 (17)
C8—C9—H9B110.3 (18)C18—C17—C16126.82 (18)
H9A—C9—H9B106 (2)C17—C18—C20115.76 (18)
C9—C10—C16112.16 (19)C17—C18—C19118.01 (18)
C9—C10—C11114.6 (2)C20—C18—C19125.99 (18)
C16—C10—C11106.56 (17)C18—C19—C11113.97 (18)
C9—C10—H10A107.5 (14)C18—C19—H19A109.8 (18)
C16—C10—H10A109.8 (14)C11—C19—H19A107.0 (18)
C11—C10—H10A106.0 (14)C18—C19—H19B113.1 (19)
N12—C11—C10107.31 (18)C11—C19—H19B107.2 (18)
N12—C11—C19115.9 (2)H19A—C19—H19B105 (2)
C10—C11—C19113.08 (19)C21—C20—C18120.57 (18)
N12—C11—H11A104.9 (15)C21—C20—H20A118.2 (16)
C10—C11—H11A109.1 (15)C18—C20—H20A121.2 (16)
C19—C11—H11A106.1 (15)C20—C21—C2123.27 (19)
C13—N12—C14108.0 (2)C20—C21—H21A118.1 (15)
C13—N12—C11112.6 (2)C2—C21—H21A118.5 (15)
C10—C11—N12—C13178.5 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1A···N12i0.91 (4)1.89 (4)2.796 (3)171 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z.
(II) (4R,4aR,7aR,12bS)-9-hydroxy-3-methyl-1,2,4,4a,5,6,7a,13-octahydro-4,12-methanobenzofuro[3,2-e]isoquinoline-7-one top
Crystal data top
C17H19NO3Dx = 1.388 Mg m3
Mr = 285.33Melting point < 550.2 K
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 8.8802 (6) ÅCell parameters from 7368 reflections
b = 10.6208 (8) Åθ = 0.4–32.6°
c = 14.4733 (9) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
V = 1365.05 (16) Å3T = 296 K
Z = 4Block, colorless
F(000) = 6080.40 × 0.32 × 0.22 mm
Data collection top
Bruker KappaCCD
diffractometer
4693 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tubeRint = 0.022
Horizonally mounted graphite crystal monochromatorθmax = 32.6°, θmin = 3.8°
CCD scansh = 1313
15227 measured reflectionsk = 1616
4920 independent reflectionsl = 2116
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.033Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F2) = 0.095H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.07 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0623P)2 + 0.0509P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
4920 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.011
257 parametersΔρmax = 0.27 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = 0.12 e Å3
Crystal data top
C17H19NO3V = 1365.05 (16) Å3
Mr = 285.33Z = 4
Orthorhombic, P212121Mo Kα radiation
a = 8.8802 (6) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
b = 10.6208 (8) ÅT = 296 K
c = 14.4733 (9) Å0.40 × 0.32 × 0.22 mm
Data collection top
Bruker KappaCCD
diffractometer
4693 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
15227 measured reflectionsRint = 0.022
4920 independent reflections
Refinement top
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.0330 restraints
wR(F2) = 0.095H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.07Δρmax = 0.27 e Å3
4920 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.12 e Å3
257 parameters
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.93240 (13)0.77706 (10)0.49050 (9)0.0470 (3)
H11.015 (3)0.792 (2)0.517 (2)0.069 (8)*
C20.94522 (14)0.66225 (11)0.44868 (8)0.0314 (2)
C30.82077 (12)0.60798 (11)0.40680 (7)0.02819 (19)
O40.67658 (10)0.65856 (9)0.39772 (7)0.03425 (18)
C50.60923 (12)0.58599 (11)0.32226 (8)0.0299 (2)
H50.500 (2)0.586 (2)0.3283 (14)0.039 (4)*
C60.64963 (14)0.64991 (13)0.23020 (10)0.0362 (2)
O70.68419 (15)0.76008 (11)0.22794 (10)0.0516 (3)
C80.6488 (2)0.56607 (16)0.14696 (10)0.0455 (3)
H8A0.549 (3)0.528 (2)0.1420 (15)0.048 (5)*
H8B0.681 (3)0.615 (2)0.0937 (18)0.058 (6)*
C90.75507 (16)0.45421 (14)0.16230 (8)0.0366 (3)
H9A0.856 (2)0.486 (2)0.1784 (15)0.048 (5)*
H9B0.759 (3)0.396 (3)0.1098 (19)0.065 (7)*
C100.69690 (13)0.37489 (11)0.24255 (7)0.0289 (2)
H100.601 (2)0.3431 (18)0.2251 (13)0.035 (4)*
C110.79909 (14)0.26306 (11)0.26841 (8)0.0322 (2)
H110.810 (2)0.2131 (17)0.2157 (12)0.033 (4)*
N120.71416 (14)0.18458 (10)0.33458 (8)0.0359 (2)
C130.7868 (2)0.06280 (15)0.35203 (14)0.0513 (4)
H13A0.80720.02170.29430.075 (8)*
H13B0.87960.07600.38470.090 (9)*
H13C0.72120.01100.38850.081 (8)*
C140.68139 (17)0.24994 (12)0.42125 (9)0.0367 (2)
H14A0.617 (3)0.1946 (18)0.4586 (14)0.044 (5)*
H14B0.769 (3)0.2710 (19)0.4580 (15)0.046 (5)*
C150.59734 (14)0.37270 (12)0.40416 (8)0.0323 (2)
H15A0.496 (2)0.3593 (17)0.3840 (13)0.034 (4)*
H15B0.592 (2)0.4201 (18)0.4616 (15)0.044 (5)*
C160.67804 (11)0.45335 (10)0.33092 (7)0.02580 (18)
C170.83077 (12)0.49110 (10)0.36541 (7)0.02626 (19)
C180.96269 (12)0.42399 (11)0.35670 (8)0.02859 (19)
C190.95925 (15)0.30434 (12)0.30011 (10)0.0356 (2)
H19A1.020 (3)0.318 (2)0.2452 (17)0.055 (6)*
H19B1.006 (3)0.233 (3)0.3363 (19)0.071 (7)*
C201.09004 (13)0.47869 (12)0.39737 (8)0.0325 (2)
H201.191 (2)0.4392 (19)0.3896 (13)0.039 (4)*
C211.07953 (14)0.59403 (12)0.44358 (8)0.0334 (2)
H211.170 (2)0.6333 (17)0.4688 (15)0.043 (5)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0399 (5)0.0442 (5)0.0569 (6)0.0038 (4)0.0079 (5)0.0219 (5)
C20.0304 (5)0.0351 (5)0.0289 (5)0.0049 (4)0.0020 (4)0.0040 (4)
C30.0249 (4)0.0316 (5)0.0281 (4)0.0005 (4)0.0002 (4)0.0050 (4)
O40.0277 (4)0.0350 (4)0.0400 (4)0.0037 (3)0.0007 (3)0.0119 (3)
C50.0232 (4)0.0327 (5)0.0337 (5)0.0021 (3)0.0005 (4)0.0050 (4)
C60.0263 (5)0.0402 (6)0.0421 (6)0.0046 (4)0.0030 (4)0.0064 (5)
O70.0452 (6)0.0432 (6)0.0663 (7)0.0039 (5)0.0079 (5)0.0138 (5)
C80.0511 (8)0.0538 (8)0.0316 (5)0.0087 (7)0.0034 (5)0.0080 (5)
C90.0400 (6)0.0445 (6)0.0254 (4)0.0030 (5)0.0035 (4)0.0002 (4)
C100.0285 (5)0.0334 (5)0.0248 (4)0.0008 (4)0.0007 (3)0.0048 (3)
C110.0352 (5)0.0305 (5)0.0310 (5)0.0001 (4)0.0044 (4)0.0064 (4)
N120.0415 (6)0.0285 (4)0.0378 (5)0.0021 (4)0.0036 (4)0.0025 (4)
C130.0601 (10)0.0338 (6)0.0602 (9)0.0061 (6)0.0052 (7)0.0034 (6)
C140.0438 (6)0.0357 (6)0.0306 (5)0.0041 (5)0.0038 (5)0.0024 (4)
C150.0314 (5)0.0369 (5)0.0285 (4)0.0044 (4)0.0065 (4)0.0038 (4)
C160.0228 (4)0.0295 (4)0.0251 (4)0.0013 (3)0.0012 (3)0.0042 (3)
C170.0237 (4)0.0291 (4)0.0260 (4)0.0012 (3)0.0001 (3)0.0029 (3)
C180.0248 (4)0.0308 (5)0.0301 (4)0.0018 (4)0.0008 (3)0.0003 (4)
C190.0296 (5)0.0331 (5)0.0441 (6)0.0039 (4)0.0046 (5)0.0060 (4)
C200.0240 (4)0.0387 (5)0.0350 (5)0.0014 (4)0.0020 (4)0.0045 (4)
C210.0272 (5)0.0412 (6)0.0320 (5)0.0054 (4)0.0056 (4)0.0014 (4)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C21.3660 (15)C11—C191.5574 (18)
O1—H10.84 (3)C11—H110.934 (17)
C2—C31.3860 (15)N12—C141.4629 (17)
C2—C211.3975 (18)N12—C131.467 (2)
C3—C171.3813 (14)C13—H13A0.9600
C3—O41.3948 (14)C13—H13B0.9600
O4—C51.4643 (14)C13—H13C0.9600
C5—C61.5379 (18)C14—C151.5225 (19)
C5—C161.5407 (16)C14—H14A0.98 (2)
C5—H50.98 (2)C14—H14B0.97 (2)
C6—O71.2101 (18)C15—C161.5398 (15)
C6—C81.498 (2)C15—H15A0.958 (19)
C8—C91.533 (2)C15—H15B0.97 (2)
C8—H8A0.97 (2)C16—C171.4998 (14)
C8—H8B0.97 (2)C17—C181.3770 (15)
C9—C101.5249 (17)C18—C201.4010 (16)
C9—H9A0.98 (2)C18—C191.5122 (16)
C9—H9B0.98 (3)C19—H19A0.97 (2)
C10—C161.5356 (14)C19—H19B1.01 (3)
C10—C111.5409 (17)C20—C211.3988 (18)
C10—H100.954 (19)C20—H201.00 (2)
C11—N121.4767 (16)C21—H210.98 (2)
C2—O1—H1107.5 (18)C13—N12—C11112.62 (12)
O1—C2—C3119.90 (11)N12—C13—H13A109.5
O1—C2—C21123.87 (11)N12—C13—H13B109.5
C3—C2—C21116.22 (10)H13A—C13—H13B109.5
C17—C3—C2120.81 (11)N12—C13—H13C109.5
C17—C3—O4111.37 (9)H13A—C13—H13C109.5
C2—C3—O4127.81 (10)H13B—C13—H13C109.5
C3—O4—C5104.03 (8)N12—C14—C15111.38 (10)
O4—C5—C6108.58 (10)N12—C14—H14A107.6 (12)
O4—C5—C16104.99 (9)C15—C14—H14A108.4 (12)
C6—C5—C16112.43 (9)N12—C14—H14B114.9 (13)
O4—C5—H5109.9 (12)C15—C14—H14B106.6 (12)
C6—C5—H5108.1 (12)H14A—C14—H14B107.7 (17)
C16—C5—H5112.8 (13)C14—C15—C16111.10 (10)
O7—C6—C8123.66 (14)C14—C15—H15A112.6 (11)
O7—C6—C5120.62 (14)C16—C15—H15A108.1 (11)
C8—C6—C5115.67 (11)C14—C15—H15B109.2 (12)
C6—C8—C9109.94 (11)C16—C15—H15B108.9 (12)
C6—C8—H8A107.9 (13)H15A—C15—H15B106.8 (17)
C9—C8—H8A104.6 (13)C17—C16—C10108.88 (9)
C6—C8—H8B108.7 (15)C17—C16—C15109.91 (9)
C9—C8—H8B110.4 (15)C10—C16—C15108.80 (9)
H8A—C8—H8B115 (2)C17—C16—C598.12 (8)
C10—C9—C8109.26 (11)C10—C16—C5118.14 (9)
C10—C9—H9A108.6 (13)C15—C16—C5112.34 (9)
C8—C9—H9A109.0 (13)C18—C17—C3124.03 (10)
C10—C9—H9B104.8 (15)C18—C17—C16126.91 (10)
C8—C9—H9B113.6 (16)C3—C17—C16109.05 (9)
H9A—C9—H9B111.5 (19)C17—C18—C20115.70 (10)
C9—C10—C16111.81 (10)C17—C18—C19117.86 (10)
C9—C10—C11114.29 (10)C20—C18—C19126.32 (10)
C16—C10—C11106.27 (9)C18—C19—C11114.49 (9)
C9—C10—H10107.3 (11)C18—C19—H19A107.6 (14)
C16—C10—H10108.4 (11)C11—C19—H19A108.1 (15)
C11—C10—H10108.6 (12)C18—C19—H19B110.0 (16)
N12—C11—C10106.97 (10)C11—C19—H19B108.4 (16)
N12—C11—C19115.74 (11)H19A—C19—H19B108 (2)
C10—C11—C19113.10 (9)C21—C20—C18120.67 (11)
N12—C11—H11105.2 (11)C21—C20—H20118.9 (12)
C10—C11—H11107.5 (11)C18—C20—H20120.3 (12)
C19—C11—H11107.8 (12)C2—C21—C20122.43 (11)
C14—N12—C13110.99 (12)C2—C21—H21117.6 (11)
C14—N12—C11112.94 (9)C20—C21—H21119.8 (12)
C10—C11—N12—C13169.5 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O4i0.84 (3)1.96 (3)2.791 (2)167 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1/2, y+3/2, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) for (I) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1A···N12i0.91 (4)1.89 (4)2.796 (3)171 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) for (II) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O4i0.84 (3)1.96 (3)2.791 (2)167 (3)
Symmetry code: (i) x+1/2, y+3/2, z+1.

Experimental details

(I)(II)
Crystal data
Chemical formulaC17H19NO3C17H19NO3
Mr285.33285.33
Crystal system, space groupOrthorhombic, P212121Orthorhombic, P212121
Temperature (K)296296
a, b, c (Å)8.9497 (6), 11.0906 (6), 14.2608 (9)8.8802 (6), 10.6208 (8), 14.4733 (9)
V3)1415.49 (15)1365.05 (16)
Z44
Radiation typeMo KαMo Kα
µ (mm1)0.090.10
Crystal size (mm)0.35 × 0.35 × 0.300.40 × 0.32 × 0.22
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker KappaCCDBruker KappaCCD
Absorption correction
No. of measured, independent and
observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections
7054, 3427, 3088 15227, 4920, 4693
Rint0.0310.022
(sin θ/λ)max1)0.6710.758
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.042, 0.096, 1.05 0.033, 0.095, 1.07
No. of reflections34274920
No. of parameters266257
H-atom treatmentAll H-atom parameters refinedH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å3)0.19, 0.170.27, 0.12

Computer programs: COLLECT (Hooft, 1998), HKL SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), HKL DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a), SHELXL2014/7 (Sheldrick, 2015b), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006), enCIFer (Allen et al., 2004).

 

References

First citationAllen, F. H., Johnson, O., Shields, G. P., Smith, B. R. & Towler, M. (2004). J. Appl. Cryst. 37, 335–338.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationBye, E. (1976). Acta Chem. Scand. Ser. B, 30, 549–554.  CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationByrn, S. R., Pfeiffer, R. R. & Stowell, J. G. (1999). In Solid-State Chemistry of Drugs. West Lafayette, Indiana: Ssci Inc.  Google Scholar
First citationGrant, D. J. (1999). Drugs Pharm. Sci. 95, 1–33.  CAS Google Scholar
First citationHooft, R. W. W. (1998). COLLECT. Nonius BV, Delft, The Netherlands.  Google Scholar
First citationKitajgorodskij, A. I. (1973). In Molecular Crystals and Molecules. New York: Academic Press.  Google Scholar
First citationMacrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453–457.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationOtwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307–326. New York: Academic Press.  Google Scholar
First citationParab, P. V., Ritschel, W. A., Coyle, D. E., Gregg, R. V. & Denson, D. D. (1988). Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 9, 187–199.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationSarhill, N., Walsh, D. & Nelson, K. A. (2001). Support. Care Cancer, 9, 84–96.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationScheins, S., Messerschmidt, M. & Luger, P. (2005). Acta Cryst. B61, 443–448.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSinghal, D. & Curatolo, W. (2004). Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 56, 335–347.  CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationVippagunta, S. R., Brittain, H. G. & Grant, D. J. (2001). Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 48, 3–26.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 72| Part 5| May 2016| Pages 730-733
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds