Crystal structure of bis­(isonicotinamide-κN1)bis­(thio­cyanato-κN)zinc

Neumann, T.; Jess, I.; Näther, C.

doi:10.1107/S2056989016008963

research communications

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 72| Part 7| July 2016| Pages 922-925

https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989016008963

Open

access

Crystal structure of bis(isonicotinamide-κN¹)bis(thiocyanato-κN)zinc

Tristan Neumann,^a ^* Inke Jess ^a and Christian Näther ^a

^aInstitut für Anorganische Chemie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Max-Eyth Strasse 2, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
^*Correspondence e-mail: t.neumann@ac.uni-kiel.de

Edited by M. Weil, Vienna University of Technology, Austria (Received 29 May 2016; accepted 3 June 2016; online 10 June 2016)

The asymmetric unit of the title complex, [Zn(SCN)₂(C₆H₆N₂O)₂], consists of one Zn²⁺ cation located on a twofold rotation axis, as well as of one thiocyanate anion and one neutral isonicotinamide ligand, both occupying general positions. The Zn²⁺ cation is tetrahedrally coordinated into a discrete complex by the N atoms of two symmetry-related thiocyanate anions and by the pyridine N atoms of two isonicotinamide ligands. The complexes are linked by intermolecular C—H⋯O and N—H⋯O, and weak intermolecular N—H⋯S hydrogen-bonding interactions into a three-dimensional network.

Keywords: crystal structure; discrete complex; zinc thiocyanate; isonicotinamide; hydrogen bonding.

CCDC reference: 1483379

1. Chemical context

The synthesis of magnetic materials is still a major field in coordination chemistry (Liu et al., 2006 ). For their construction, paramagnetic cations can be linked by small anionic ligands such as thiocyanate anions to enable a magnetic exchange between the cations (Palion-Gazda et al., 2015 ; Banerjee et al., 2005 ). In this context we have reported on a number of coordination polymers with thiocyanato ligands that show different magnetic phenomena, including a slow relaxation of the magnetization which is indicative of single-chain magnetism (Werner et al., 2014 ; 2015a ,b ,c ). In several cases, such phases can only be prepared by thermal decomposition of suitable precursor compounds (Näther et al., 2013 ), leading to microcrystalline powders for which a straightforward crystal structure determination is difficult. In order to avoid this scenario, compounds of the same composition based on cadmium or zinc can be prepared in the form of single crystals. In many cases, such zinc and cadmium compounds are isotypic to the paramagnetic analogues, and the structure of the latter can then easily be refined by the Rietveld method (Wöhlert et al., 2013 ). It should be mentioned that the structures of cadmium compounds are useful as prototypes for transition metal compounds with octahedral coordination spheres, whereas the structures of zinc compounds are useful prototypes for compounds with tetrahedral coordination spheres for the transition metal. The thermal decomposition of cobalt complexes is an example of the latter. In the course of our systematic investigation in this regard, we became interested in isonicotinamide as a co-ligand to be reacted with Zn(SCN)₂. The synthesis and crystal structure of the resulting compound, [Zn(NCS)₂(C₆H₆N₂O)₂], are reported here.

2. Structural commentary

The asymmetric unit of the title compound consists of one Zn²⁺ cation, one thiocyanate anion and one neutral isonicotinamide ligand. The thiocyanate anion and the isonicotinamide ligand are located on general positions whereas the Zn²⁺ cation is located on a twofold rotation axis. The Zn²⁺ cation is tetrahedrally coordinated by two terminal N-bonded thiocyanato ligands and by two isonicotinamide ligands through their pyridine N atoms into a discrete complex (Fig. 1). As expected, the Zn—N bond length involving the thiocyanate anion (N1) is significantly shorter than that to the pyridine N atom (N11) of the neutral ligand (Table 1). The angular distortion of the ZnN₄ tetrahedron is noticeable, with N—Zn—N angles ranging from 104.32 (13) to 123.6 (2)°.

Table 1
Selected bond lengths (Å)

Zn1—N1	1.921 (3)	Zn1—N11	2.033 (3)

Figure 1
View of the discrete complex with labelling and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. [Symmetry code: (i) −x + 1, −y + 1, z.]

3. Supramolecular features

In the crystal structure, the discrete complexes are stacked along the c axis and are linked by intermolecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bonding between one of the two amide H atoms and the amide O atom of a neighboring complex (Fig. 2 and Table 2). There is a further weak contact between one aromatic H atom of the pyridine ring and the carbonyl O atom of a neighboring complex (Table 2). The second H atom of the NH₂ group is involved in intermolecular N—H⋯S hydrogen bonding to the S atoms of the anionic ligand. In this way a three-dimensional hydrogen-bonded network is formed.

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
C14—H14⋯O11ⁱ	0.95	2.54	3.365 (6)	145
N12—H12A⋯S1ⁱⁱ	0.88	2.62	3.407 (3)	150
N12—H12B⋯O11ⁱ	0.88	1.97	2.821 (4)	162
Symmetry codes: (i) $[x+{\script{1\over 4}}, -y+{\script{5\over 4}}, z+{\script{1\over 4}}]$ ; (ii) $[-x+{\script{3\over 4}}, y+{\script{1\over 4}}, z+{\script{7\over 4}}]$ .

Figure 2
The packing of the complexes in the title compound, in a view along the c axis. Intermolecular hydrogen bonding is shown as dashed lines.

4. Database survey

To the best of our knowledge, there are only five coordination polymers with isonicotinamide and thiocyanate anions deposited in the Cambridge Structure Database (Version 5.37, last update 2015; Groom et al., 2016 ). This includes two clathrate-structures of Ni compounds with μ-1,3-bridging thiocyanate anions and with 9,10-anthraquinone and pyrene as solvate molecules (Sekiya et al., 2009 ). Furthermore, a one-dimensional μ-1,3-thiocyanate-bridged cadmium compound with 9,10-dichloroanthracene as clathrate molecule (Sekiya & Nishikiori, 2005 ) as well as a three-dimensional network of Cd with μ-1,3-bridging thiocyanate anions (Yang et al., 2001 ) are known. Finally, a compound consisting of Cu^II–NCS sheets has been reported (Đaković et al., 2010 ).

5. Synthesis and crystallization

Ba(NCS)₂·3H₂O, ZnSO₄·H₂O and isonicotinamide were purchased from Alfa Aesar. Zn(NCS)₂ was synthesized by stirring 3.076 g Ba(NCS)₂·3H₂O (10 mmol) with 1.795 g ZnSO₄·H₂O (10 mmol) in 350 ml water. The white residue was filtered off and the filtrate was dried using a rotary evaporator. The homogenity was checked by X-ray powder diffraction and elemental analysis. Crystals of the title compound suitable for single crystal X-Ray diffraction were obtained by the reaction of 27.2 mg Zn(NCS)₂ (0.15 mmol) with 36.64 mg isonicotinamide (0.3 mmol) in methylcyanide (1.5 ml) within a few days.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3. C- and N-bound H atoms were located in a difference Fourier map but were positioned with idealized geometry. They were refined with U_iso(H) = 1.2U_eq(C, N) using a riding model with C—H = 0.95 Å for aromatic and N—H = 0.88 Å for the amide H atoms. The absolute structure was determined and is in agreement with the selected setting [Flack x parameter: 0.005 (19) by classical fit to all intensities (Flack, 1983 ) and −0.005 (8) from 819 selected quotients (Parsons et al., 2013 )].

Table 3
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	[Zn(NCS)₂(C₆H₆N₂O)₂]
M_r	425.79
Crystal system, space group	Orthorhombic, Fdd2
Temperature (K)	200
a, b, c (Å)	19.1926 (9), 36.3044 (12), 5.2930 (2)
V (Å³)	3688.0 (3)
Z	8
Radiation type	Mo Kα
μ (mm⁻¹)	1.58
Crystal size (mm)	0.20 × 0.16 × 0.11

Data collection
Diffractometer	Stoe IPDS2
Absorption correction	Numerical (X-SHAPE and X-RED32; Stoe, 2008 )
T_min, T_max	0.595, 0.742
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	15338, 2132, 2012
R_int	0.035
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.662

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.031, 0.067, 1.13
No. of reflections	2132
No. of parameters	114
No. of restraints	1
H-atom treatment	H-atom parameters constrained
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.24, −0.27
Absolute structure	Flack x determined using 819 quotients [(I⁺)−(I⁻)]/[(I⁺)+(I⁻)] (Parsons et al., 2013).
Absolute structure parameter	−0.005 (8)
Computer programs: X-AREA (Stoe, 2008), SHELXS97 and XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999 ) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ).

Supporting information

CCDC reference: 1483379

Crystal structure: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989016008963/wm5297sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989016008963/wm5297Isup2.hkl

checkCIF report

Computing details top

Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe, 2008); cell refinement: X-AREA (Stoe, 2008); data reduction: X-AREA (Stoe, 2008); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Bis(isonicotinamide-κN¹)bis(thiocyanato-κN)zinc top

Crystal data top

[Zn(NCS)₂(C₆H₆N₂O)₂]	D_x = 1.534 Mg m⁻³
M_r = 425.79	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, Fdd2	Cell parameters from 15683 reflections
a = 19.1926 (9) Å	θ = 4.2–56.2°
b = 36.3044 (12) Å	µ = 1.58 mm⁻¹
c = 5.2930 (2) Å	T = 200 K
V = 3688.0 (3) Å³	Block, colorless
Z = 8	0.20 × 0.16 × 0.11 mm
F(000) = 1728

Data collection top

Stoe IPDS-2 diffractometer	2012 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
ω scans	R_int = 0.035
Absorption correction: numerical (X-SHAPE and X-RED32; Stoe, 2008)	θ_max = 28.1°, θ_min = 2.2°
T_min = 0.595, T_max = 0.742	h = −25→25
15338 measured reflections	k = −47→47
2132 independent reflections	l = −6→6

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: full	H-atom parameters constrained
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.031	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0282P)² + 4.6943P] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
wR(F²) = 0.067	(Δ/σ)_max < 0.001
S = 1.13	Δρ_max = 0.24 e Å⁻³
2132 reflections	Δρ_min = −0.27 e Å⁻³
114 parameters	Absolute structure: Flack x determined using 819 quotients [(I⁺)-(I^-)]/[(I⁺)+(I^-)] (Parsons et al., 2013).
1 restraint	Absolute structure parameter: −0.005 (8)

Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
Zn1	0.5000	0.5000	0.00134 (10)	0.04197 (15)
N1	0.41911 (18)	0.48143 (9)	−0.1702 (7)	0.0562 (8)
C1	0.3688 (2)	0.46990 (10)	−0.2648 (9)	0.0514 (9)
S1	0.29987 (6)	0.45456 (4)	−0.4003 (3)	0.0802 (4)
N11	0.46205 (13)	0.53943 (7)	0.2367 (6)	0.0399 (6)
C11	0.39419 (17)	0.54254 (10)	0.2958 (8)	0.0465 (9)
H11	0.3616	0.5266	0.2164	0.056*
C12	0.37026 (17)	0.56804 (10)	0.4673 (8)	0.0466 (8)
H12	0.3219	0.5697	0.5036	0.056*
C13	0.41714 (16)	0.59132 (9)	0.5870 (7)	0.0373 (7)
C14	0.48690 (15)	0.58811 (9)	0.5240 (9)	0.0438 (8)
H14	0.5205	0.6037	0.6011	0.053*
C15	0.50720 (17)	0.56217 (10)	0.3489 (7)	0.0428 (8)
H15	0.5552	0.5604	0.3063	0.051*
C16	0.39066 (16)	0.61924 (9)	0.7711 (8)	0.0429 (7)
N12	0.43541 (15)	0.63295 (9)	0.9372 (6)	0.0486 (8)
H12A	0.4215	0.6495	1.0479	0.058*
H12B	0.4791	0.6255	0.9367	0.058*
O11	0.32905 (12)	0.62889 (8)	0.7653 (7)	0.0590 (8)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
Zn1	0.0442 (3)	0.0394 (2)	0.0424 (3)	0.0020 (3)	0.000	0.000
N1	0.059 (2)	0.0546 (19)	0.055 (2)	0.0028 (16)	−0.0093 (16)	−0.0096 (15)
C1	0.056 (2)	0.0481 (18)	0.050 (2)	0.0044 (16)	0.0007 (19)	−0.011 (2)
S1	0.0496 (6)	0.0997 (10)	0.0914 (10)	−0.0051 (6)	−0.0034 (6)	−0.0432 (8)
N11	0.0374 (13)	0.0388 (13)	0.0434 (16)	0.0011 (10)	−0.0010 (13)	−0.0002 (13)
C11	0.0353 (16)	0.0455 (17)	0.059 (3)	−0.0030 (14)	−0.0043 (16)	−0.0088 (17)
C12	0.0311 (15)	0.0500 (17)	0.059 (2)	−0.0009 (13)	−0.0041 (15)	−0.0082 (18)
C13	0.0330 (15)	0.0381 (15)	0.0408 (17)	0.0017 (12)	−0.0052 (13)	0.0017 (13)
C14	0.0296 (16)	0.0491 (16)	0.053 (2)	−0.0052 (12)	−0.0021 (17)	−0.0081 (19)
C15	0.0341 (16)	0.0471 (18)	0.047 (2)	−0.0004 (13)	−0.0007 (15)	−0.0036 (15)
C16	0.0327 (14)	0.0492 (17)	0.0467 (19)	0.0021 (12)	−0.0048 (15)	−0.0069 (17)
N12	0.0349 (14)	0.0582 (18)	0.053 (2)	0.0051 (13)	−0.0076 (13)	−0.0151 (15)
O11	0.0322 (12)	0.0719 (17)	0.0728 (19)	0.0104 (11)	−0.0097 (14)	−0.0258 (18)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

Zn1—N1ⁱ	1.921 (3)	C12—H12	0.9500
Zn1—N1	1.921 (3)	C13—C14	1.385 (4)
Zn1—N11	2.033 (3)	C13—C16	1.495 (5)
Zn1—N11ⁱ	2.033 (3)	C14—C15	1.378 (5)
N1—C1	1.165 (5)	C14—H14	0.9500
C1—S1	1.605 (4)	C15—H15	0.9500
N11—C15	1.336 (4)	C16—O11	1.233 (4)
N11—C11	1.344 (4)	C16—N12	1.326 (5)
C11—C12	1.376 (5)	N12—H12A	0.8800
C11—H11	0.9500	N12—H12B	0.8800
C12—C13	1.387 (5)

N1ⁱ—Zn1—N1	123.6 (2)	C13—C12—H12	120.2
N1ⁱ—Zn1—N11	109.39 (13)	C14—C13—C12	117.8 (3)
N1—Zn1—N11	104.32 (13)	C14—C13—C16	122.9 (3)
N1ⁱ—Zn1—N11ⁱ	104.32 (13)	C12—C13—C16	119.3 (3)
N1—Zn1—N11ⁱ	109.40 (13)	C15—C14—C13	119.5 (3)
N11—Zn1—N11ⁱ	104.42 (17)	C15—C14—H14	120.2
C1—N1—Zn1	177.2 (4)	C13—C14—H14	120.2
N1—C1—S1	178.8 (5)	N11—C15—C14	122.6 (3)
C15—N11—C11	118.2 (3)	N11—C15—H15	118.7
C15—N11—Zn1	118.4 (2)	C14—C15—H15	118.7
C11—N11—Zn1	123.3 (2)	O11—C16—N12	122.1 (4)
N11—C11—C12	122.3 (3)	O11—C16—C13	120.1 (3)
N11—C11—H11	118.9	N12—C16—C13	117.8 (3)
C12—C11—H11	118.9	C16—N12—H12A	120.0
C11—C12—C13	119.7 (3)	C16—N12—H12B	120.0
C11—C12—H12	120.2	H12A—N12—H12B	120.0

Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
C14—H14···O11ⁱⁱ	0.95	2.54	3.365 (6)	145
N12—H12A···S1ⁱⁱⁱ	0.88	2.62	3.407 (3)	150
N12—H12B···O11ⁱⁱ	0.88	1.97	2.821 (4)	162

Symmetry codes: (ii) x+1/4, −y+5/4, z+1/4; (iii) −x+3/4, y+1/4, z+7/4.

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Project No. NA 720/5–1) and the State of Schleswig-Holstein. We thank Professor Dr Wolfgang Bensch for access to his experimental facilities.

References

Banerjee, S., Drew, M. G. B., Lu, C.-Z., Tercero, J., Diaz, C. & Ghosh, A. (2005). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 2376–2383. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Brandenburg, K. (1999). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Đaković, M., Jagličić, Z., Kozlevčar, B. & Popović, Z. (2010). Polyhedron, 29, 1910–1917. Google Scholar
Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Liu, X.-T., Wang, W.-Z., Zhang, W.-X., Cui, P. & Gao, S. (2006). Adv. Mater. 18, 2852–2856. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Näther, C., Wöhlert, S., Boeckmann, J., Wriedt, M. & Jess, I. (2013). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 639, 2696–2714. Google Scholar
Palion-Gazda, J., Machura, B., Lloret, F. & Julve, M. (2015). Cryst. Growth Des. 15, 2380–2388. CAS Google Scholar
Parsons, S., Flack, H. D. & Wagner, T. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 249–259. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sekiya, R. & Nishikiori, S. (2005). Chem. Lett. 34, 1076–1077. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sekiya, R., Nishikiori, S. & Kuroda, R. (2009). CrystEngComm, 11, 2251–2253. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Stoe (2008). X-AREA, X-RED32 and X-SHAPE. Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany. Google Scholar
Werner, J., Rams, M., Tomkowicz, Z. & Näther, C. (2014). Dalton Trans. 43, 17333–17342. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Werner, J., Rams, M., Tomkowicz, Z., Runčevski, T., Dinnebier, R. E., Suckert, S. & Näther, C. (2015a). Inorg. Chem. 54, 2893–2901. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Werner, J., Runčevski, T., Dinnebier, R. E., Ebbinghaus, S. G., Suckert, S. & Näther, C. (2015b). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 3236–3245. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Werner, J., Tomkowicz, Z., Rams, M., Ebbinghaus, S. G., Neumann, T. & Näther, C. (2015c). Dalton Trans. 44, 14149–14158. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wöhlert, S., Peters, L. & Näther, C. (2013). Dalton Trans. 42, 10746–10758. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Yang, G., Zhu, H.-G., Liang, B.-H. & Chen, X.-M. (2001). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 580–585. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar