research communications
catena-poly[diammonium [di-μ-oxalato-cuprate(II)]]
ofaDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, MSC03 2060, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA, and bAdvanced Materials Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories, 1001 University Blvd SE, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: rakemp@unm.edu
The structure of the title compound, {(NH4)2[Cu(C2O4)2]}n, at 100 K has monoclinic (P21/c) symmetry with the CuII atom on an inversion center. The compound has a polymeric structure due to long Cu⋯O interactions which create [Cu(C2O4)2] chains along the a axis. The structure also displays intermolecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bonding, which links these chains into a three-dimensional network.
Keywords: crystal structure; copper; oxalate; hydrogen bonding; ammonium.
CCDC reference: 1515161
1. Chemical context
Metal oxalate salts are ubiquitous in nature (Baran, 2014) and are also of great interest to synthetic chemists and materials scientists because they often display unusual magnetic and conductive properties (Nenwa et al., 2015; Robinson et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2012; Clemente-León et al., 2011; Gruselle et al., 2006). Other areas of study for metal oxalates include, but are not limited to, metallogels (Feldner et al., 2016), coordination polymers and networks (Guo et al., 2016; Mizzi & LaDuca, 2016; Yeşilel et al., 2010), and precursors for nanomaterials and metallic inks (Yadav et al., 2013; Cheng et al., 2016). The properties of metal oxalates are often tuned by using a combination of different cations. These may be simply metal cations, but often they are more complex, such as quaternary nitrogen cations. Surprisingly, the structure of the simplest of the (NR4)2[Cu(C2O4)2] family, (NH4)2[Cu(C2O4)2], has not previously been reported.
2. Structural commentary
The title compound crystallizes in the monoclinic P21/c with the copper atom on an inversion center (Fig. 1). As is true for all but one copper oxalate complex (Gu & Xue, 2007) found in the CSD (Version 5.37, May 2016 update; Groom et al., 2016), the copper atom is chelated by oxygen atoms from the adjacent carbon atoms to form a five membered ring, rather than oxygen atoms from the same carbon. The coordination environment of copper is nearly perfectly square planar, with the O1—Cu1—O2 bond angle measuring 85.44 (3)° within the and 94.56 (3)° across the inversion center. Within the plane of the oxalate ligand, O1 and O2 form bonds to Cu1 measuring 1.9326 (7) and 1.9301 (7) Å, respectively. O3 interacts weakly, at a distance of 2.7057 (8) Å, with the symmetry-related Cu atoms above and below the ligand plane, giving an elongated octahedron. O4 has no bonding interactions with Cu, but does engage in hydrogen bonding with the ammonium cation (see below). The different ways that the oxygen atoms do or do not interact with copper is reflected in the C—O bonds. The two oxygen atoms that are strongly bound to copper, O1 and O2, have slightly longer bonds to carbon of 1.2798 (11) and 1.2895 (12) Å for C1—O1 and C2—O2, respectively. The weakly interacting O3 and non-bonded O4 have shorter C—O bonds of 1.2355 (12) and 1.2249 (12) Å for C1—O3 and C2—O4, respectively.
3. Supramolecular features
As noted above, the coordination sphere of the copper atoms is completed by a long interaction of 2.7057 (8) Å between O3 and Cu1 in the planes above and below the ligand, giving rise to polymeric copper oxalate chains along the a axis (Fig. 2). These chains do not interact directly with one another. Instead, they are linked into a three-dimensional network by partly bifurcated N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Fig. 3) between all four protons of the ammonium cation and the oxalate oxygen atoms indicated by the symmetry operations in Table 1.
4. Database survey
There are three published reports of hydrated ammonium copper oxalate but to the best of our knowledge, the anhydrous title compound has not been reported previously. The earliest report, for (NH4)4n[Cu2(C2O4)4(H2O)2]n·2nH2O (Viswamitra, 1962) was reinterpreted (Novosad et al., 2000) as a polymeric complex with the repeat unit consisting of two [Cu(C2O4)2] moieties. One copper atom forms long Cu—O bonds to the next unit, similar to the way in which the title compound forms its chains, while the other is capped by two water molecules. A different hydrate, (NH4)8[Cu4(C2O4)8(H2O)2·4H2O, has also been reported (Kadir et al., 2006), but it does not feature chains of polymeric copper oxalate. Instead, it exists as a discrete water-capped tetramer. In each case, these hydrates also display hydrogen bonding between the oxalate, ammonium and water molecules. Besides the simple hydrates, structures of ammonium copper oxalates with polyoxidometalates based on tungsten (Reinoso et al., 2005, 2007) or molybdenum (Li et al., 2011) have been reported.
5. Synthesis and crystallization
A solution of bis(diisopropylphosphanyl)amine (0.25 g, 1.0 mmol) in 1 mL MeOH was added to a slurry of copper(II) oxalate hemihydrate (0.15 g, 1.0 mmol) in 1 mL MeOH. The mixture was heated to reflux for 5 min and then allowed to cool to room temperature. After three days, the blue supernatant solution was decanted from an insoluble powder and cooled to 248 K. Block-like blue crystals of the title compound were isolated after six weeks. The mechanism by which bis(diisopropylphosphanyl)amine decomposes into ammonium is under investigation.
6. Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure .
details are summarized in Table 2
|
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 1515161
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989016017631/pj2038sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989016017631/pj2038Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989016017631/pj2038Isup3.cdx
Data collection: BIS (Bruker, 2015); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2015); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2015); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).2(H4N+)·C4CuO82− | F(000) = 278 |
Mr = 275.66 | Dx = 2.090 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 4.8564 (2) Å | Cell parameters from 5449 reflections |
b = 13.5188 (5) Å | θ = 3.0–33.1° |
c = 6.7205 (3) Å | µ = 2.53 mm−1 |
β = 96.992 (2)° | T = 100 K |
V = 437.94 (3) Å3 | Block, blue |
Z = 2 | 0.43 × 0.28 × 0.28 mm |
Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD diffractometer | 1672 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus tube | 1537 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Graphite monochromator | Rint = 0.017 |
Detector resolution: 8.3333 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 33.2°, θmin = 3.0° |
φ and ω scans | h = −7→7 |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2015) | k = −20→18 |
Tmin = 0.41, Tmax = 0.54 | l = −9→10 |
8277 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.018 | All H-atom parameters refined |
wR(F2) = 0.051 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0263P)2 + 0.1971P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.08 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
1672 reflections | Δρmax = 0.37 e Å−3 |
86 parameters | Δρmin = −0.51 e Å−3 |
0 restraints |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Cu1 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.00661 (5) | |
O1 | 0.32614 (14) | 0.44779 (5) | 0.15885 (10) | 0.00795 (12) | |
O2 | 0.15437 (14) | 0.62834 (5) | 0.07337 (11) | 0.00968 (13) | |
O3 | 0.72392 (16) | 0.50253 (5) | 0.32622 (12) | 0.01101 (14) | |
O4 | 0.52948 (15) | 0.69388 (5) | 0.25066 (12) | 0.01245 (14) | |
C1 | 0.4930 (2) | 0.51573 (7) | 0.23064 (14) | 0.00716 (15) | |
C2 | 0.39072 (19) | 0.62308 (7) | 0.18343 (14) | 0.00800 (15) | |
N1 | 0.95132 (18) | 0.67395 (6) | 0.57854 (13) | 0.00966 (14) | |
H1 | 0.840 (3) | 0.6723 (13) | 0.662 (3) | 0.020 (4)* | |
H2 | 1.027 (3) | 0.7319 (13) | 0.582 (3) | 0.019 (4)* | |
H3 | 1.072 (4) | 0.6285 (14) | 0.607 (3) | 0.023 (4)* | |
H4 | 0.849 (4) | 0.6643 (14) | 0.468 (3) | 0.029 (5)* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Cu1 | 0.00454 (8) | 0.00426 (8) | 0.01054 (8) | −0.00002 (5) | −0.00113 (5) | 0.00048 (5) |
O1 | 0.0065 (3) | 0.0063 (3) | 0.0106 (3) | 0.0002 (2) | −0.0011 (2) | 0.0008 (2) |
O2 | 0.0068 (3) | 0.0060 (3) | 0.0153 (3) | 0.0005 (2) | −0.0026 (2) | −0.0002 (2) |
O3 | 0.0084 (3) | 0.0099 (3) | 0.0136 (3) | 0.0011 (2) | −0.0033 (2) | −0.0005 (2) |
O4 | 0.0125 (3) | 0.0075 (3) | 0.0160 (3) | −0.0016 (2) | −0.0035 (2) | −0.0014 (2) |
C1 | 0.0071 (3) | 0.0064 (3) | 0.0081 (3) | 0.0007 (3) | 0.0013 (3) | 0.0003 (3) |
C2 | 0.0074 (3) | 0.0070 (4) | 0.0094 (3) | 0.0009 (3) | 0.0005 (3) | 0.0000 (3) |
N1 | 0.0100 (3) | 0.0075 (3) | 0.0110 (3) | −0.0017 (3) | −0.0007 (3) | 0.0004 (3) |
Cu1—O2i | 1.9301 (7) | O4—C2 | 1.2249 (12) |
Cu1—O2 | 1.9301 (7) | C1—C2 | 1.5541 (13) |
Cu1—O1i | 1.9326 (7) | N1—H1 | 0.824 (17) |
Cu1—O1 | 1.9326 (7) | N1—H2 | 0.865 (18) |
O1—C1 | 1.2798 (11) | N1—H3 | 0.854 (19) |
O2—C2 | 1.2895 (12) | N1—H4 | 0.85 (2) |
O3—C1 | 1.2355 (12) | ||
O2i—Cu1—O2 | 180.00 (4) | O1—C1—C2 | 114.91 (8) |
O2i—Cu1—O1i | 85.44 (3) | O4—C2—O2 | 125.44 (9) |
O2—Cu1—O1i | 94.56 (3) | O4—C2—C1 | 120.44 (8) |
O2i—Cu1—O1 | 94.57 (3) | O2—C2—C1 | 114.12 (8) |
O2—Cu1—O1 | 85.43 (3) | H1—N1—H2 | 108.8 (16) |
O1i—Cu1—O1 | 180.0 | H1—N1—H3 | 108.4 (16) |
C1—O1—Cu1 | 112.64 (6) | H2—N1—H3 | 111.5 (16) |
C2—O2—Cu1 | 112.83 (6) | H1—N1—H4 | 103.3 (16) |
O3—C1—O1 | 125.83 (9) | H2—N1—H4 | 111.1 (16) |
O3—C1—C2 | 119.23 (8) | H3—N1—H4 | 113.3 (17) |
Cu1—O1—C1—O3 | −175.08 (8) | O3—C1—C2—O4 | −4.51 (14) |
Cu1—O1—C1—C2 | 2.83 (9) | O1—C1—C2—O4 | 177.43 (9) |
Cu1—O2—C2—O4 | −179.39 (8) | O3—C1—C2—O2 | 176.24 (9) |
Cu1—O2—C2—C1 | −0.18 (10) | O1—C1—C2—O2 | −1.82 (12) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y+1, −z. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
N1—H1···O1ii | 0.824 (17) | 2.230 (17) | 2.8667 (11) | 134.2 (16) |
N1—H1···O4iii | 0.824 (17) | 2.475 (17) | 3.0503 (12) | 127.8 (15) |
N1—H2···O2iv | 0.865 (18) | 1.991 (18) | 2.8507 (11) | 172.5 (16) |
N1—H3···O3v | 0.854 (19) | 2.053 (19) | 2.8884 (11) | 165.7 (17) |
N1—H4···O3 | 0.85 (2) | 2.43 (2) | 3.0015 (11) | 124.7 (16) |
N1—H4···O4 | 0.85 (2) | 2.04 (2) | 2.8330 (12) | 155.1 (18) |
Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (iii) x, −y+3/2, z+1/2; (iv) x+1, −y+3/2, z+1/2; (v) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1. |
Acknowledgements
This work was supported financially by the National Science Foundation (grant CHE12–13529). The Bruker X-ray diffractometer was purchased by a National Science Foundation CRIF:MU award to the University of New Mexico (CHE04–43580). Sandia is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the US Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-AC04–94-AL85000.
References
Baran, E. J. (2014). J. Coord. Chem. 67, 3734–3768. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Brandenburg (1999). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Bruker (2015). BIS, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Cheng, G., Si, C., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Yang, W., Dong, C. & Zhang, Z. (2016). J. Power Sources, 312, 184–191. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Clemente-León, M., Coronado, E., Martí-Gastaldo, C. & Romero, F. M. (2011). Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 473–497. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Feldner, T., Häring, M., Saha, S., Esquena, J., Banerjee, R. & Díaz, D. D. (2016). Chem. Mater. 28, 3210–3217. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Gruselle, M., Train, C., Boubekeur, K., Gredin, P. & Ovanesyan, N. (2006). Coord. Chem. Rev. 250, 2491–2500. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Gu, X. & Xue, D. (2007). Cryst. Growth Des. 7, 1726–1732. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Guo, F., Chen, C., Wang, K., Zhang, Q. & Lin, Z. (2016). Inorg. Chem. 55, 7817–7819. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kadir, K., Mohammad Ahmed, T., Noreús, D. & Eriksson, L. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, m1139–m1141. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Li, J., Liu, Y., Luo, J., Zhao, J. W., Ma, P. T. & Niu, J. Y. (2011). Russ. J. Coord. Chem. 37, 849–853. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Mizzi, J. E. & LaDuca, R. L. (2016). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 70, 4–6. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Nenwa, J., Djomo, E. D., Nfor, E. N., Djonwouo, P. L., Mbarki, M. & Fokwa, B. P. T. (2015). Polyhedron, 99, 26–33. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Novosad, J., Messimeri, A. C., Papadimitriou, C. D., Veltsistas, P. G. & Woollins, J. D. (2000). Transition Met. Chem. 25, 664–669. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Reinoso, S., Vitoria, P., Gutiérrez-Zorrilla, J. M., Lezama, L., Madariaga, J. M., San Felices, L. & Iturrospe, A. (2007). Inorg. Chem. 46, 4010–4021. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Reinoso, S., Vitoria, P., Gutiérrez-Zorrilla, J. M., Lezama, L., San Felices, L. & Beitia, J. I. (2005). Inorg. Chem. 44, 9731–9742. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Robinson, M. E., Mizzi, J. E., Staples, R. J. & LaDuca, R. L. (2015). Cryst. Growth Des. 15, 2260–2271. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Viswamitra, M. A. (1962). J. Chem. Phys. 37, 1408–1414. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Yadav, G. G., David, A., Favaloro, T., Yang, H., Shakouri, A., Caruthers, J. & Wu, Y. (2013). J. Mater. Chem. A, 1, 11901–11908. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Yeşilel, O. Z., Erer, H., Odabaşoğlu, M. & Büyükgüngör, O. (2010). J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 20, 78–82. Google Scholar
Zhang, B., Zhang, Y. & Zhu, D. (2012). Dalton Trans. 41, 8509–8511. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.