Crystal structure of 4,10-dimeth­oxy-13-methyl-6H,12H-6,12-epimino­dibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocine

Kasyanova, K.V.; Kokozay, V.N.; Buvaylo, E.A.; Vassilyeva, O.Y.; Skelton, B.W.

doi:10.1107/S2056989017002328

research communications

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 73| Part 3| March 2017| Pages 410-412

https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017002328

Open

access

Crystal structure of 4,10-dimethoxy-13-methyl-6H,12H-6,12-epiminodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocine

Katerina V. Kasyanova,^a Vladimir N. Kokozay,^a Elena A. Buvaylo,^a Olga Yu. Vassilyeva ^a ^* and Brian W. Skelton ^b

^aDepartment of Chemistry, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 64/13 Volodymyrska Street, Kyiv 01601, Ukraine, and ^bSchool of Molecular Sciences, M310, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
^*Correspondence e-mail: vassilyeva@univ.kiev.ua

Edited by P. C. Healy, Griffith University, Australia (Received 10 February 2017; accepted 11 February 2017; online 21 February 2017)

The title compound, C₁₇H₁₇NO₄, lacks crystallographic symmetry with one molecule per asymmetric unit. The molecule exists in a folded butterfly-like conformation; the benzene rings form a dihedral angle of 84.72 (7)°. The central eight-membered imino-bridged dioxocin ring adopts a twisted-boat conformation. In the crystal, inversion-related molecules are linked by pairs of weak C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming double-stranded chains parallel to the a axis.

Keywords: crystal structure; o-vanillin; methylamine hydrochloride; Schiff base; self-condensation; [1,5]dioxocin ring; twisted-boat conformation.

CCDC reference: 1532218

1. Chemical context

Tröger's base and its structural analogues are characterized by two flat, usually aromatic and identical, pincers interlocked in an almost perpendicular fashion (Dolenský et al., 2012 ). Both the chirality and the conformational rigidity of their central diazocine, dioxocin or dithiocin skeletons are the reasons why these cleft-shaped molecules have been of interest in molecular recognition (Hardouin-Lerouge et al., 2011 ), as chiral solvating agents (Wilen et al., 1991 ), and in the field of asymmetric synthesis (Minder et al., 1995 ).

Over the last few years, we have been exploring the chemistry of transition metal complexes of Schiff base ligands with the aim of preparing heterometallic polynuclear compounds with diverse potential advantages (Chygorin et al., 2012 ; Nesterova et al., 2013 ). The Schiff base ligand 2-methoxy-6-iminomethylphenol (HL) with various connectivity modes has been successfully used as a multidentate linker between several metal centres by our group and others (Meally et al., 2010 ; Sydoruk et al., 2013 ). The HL ligand is usually obtained by the standard method of condensation of the substituted salicylaldehyde with an aqueous solution of methylamine in methanol (Meally et al., 2010). In the present work, we used a mixture of 2-hydroxy-3-methoxy-benzaldehyde and methylamine hydrochloride to react with a zinc salt in an attempt to synthesize a Zn complex with the HL ligand (see Scheme). The resulting Schiff base apparently underwent self-condensation to form the substituted dibenzoimino[1,5]dioxocin, 4,10-dimethoxy-13-methyl-6H,12H-6,12-epiminodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocine, (I), the crystal structure of which is presented here. A close analogue of the title compound was reported to result from 2-(N-methyliminomethyl)phenol, a liquid product of a similar condensation of salicylaldehyde and methylamine, after a few months storage in mild conditions (Filarowski et al., 1998 ). A tentative mechanism for the formation of the [1,5]iminodioxocin ring in the reaction between an aromatic aldehyde and a primary amine was given by Mandal et al. (2006 ).

2. Structural commentary

The title compound is composed of four fused rings including two benzene (C11–C16 and C21–C26) and two six-membered heterocyclic rings (O11/C11/C12/C121/N1/C221 and O21/C21/C22/C221/N1/C121) (Fig. 1). The organic molecule has two chiral centres and lacks crystallographic symmetry; the crystal is racemic. The molecule exists in a folded butterfly-like conformation with a dihedral (folding) angle between the two benzene rings of 84.72 (7)°. The eight-membered imino-bridged dioxocin ring adopts a twisted-boat conformation, as judged from the eight torsion angles observed within this ring (τ₁–τ₈) (Mandal et al., 2006). The bond lengths and angles are unexceptional and are closely related to those of N-methyl-2,6,-dioxa-9-aza-(c,g)dibenzo(3.3.1)nonane (CSD refcode UCERIE; Filarowski et al., 1998); the dihedral angle of 84.72 (7)° is larger than that in the unsubstituted iminodioxocin molecule (80.95°).

Figure 1
The molecular structure of the title compound, showing the atom-numbering scheme. Non-H atoms are shown with displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level.

3. Supramolecular features

In the crystal, double-stranded chains of inversion-related molecules linked by pairs of weak C–H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Table 1) propagate in the a-axis direction (Fig. 2). Adjacent hydrogen-bonded chains are arranged in a parallel fashion to ensure efficient crystal packing of the clefts. Surprisingly, neither π–π stacking [the shortest centroid–centroid distance (offset) = 3.96 Å] nor C—H⋯π interactions (the shortest H⋯centroid distance = 3.34 Å) play a significant role in formation of the crystal structure of (I).

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
C13—H13⋯O11ⁱ	0.95	2.69	3.5616 (19)	152
C1—H1B⋯O26ⁱⁱ	0.98	2.53	3.508 (2)	176
Symmetry codes: (i) x-1, y, z; (ii) -x+1, -y+1, -z+2.

Figure 2
Crystal packing of (I)

, showing the parallel arrangement of double-stranded hydrogen-bonded chains of the dibenzoimino[1,5]dioxocin molecules along the a-axis direction. Intermolecular hydrogen bonds are shown as blue dashed lines.

4. Database survey

More than 1000 crystal structures of molecules featuring eight-membered heterocine rings with two oxygen atoms in a 1,2-, 1,3-, 1,4- and 1,5-relationship, both uncondensed and fused to five-, six-, and seven-membered carbocycles or heterocycles, are found in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD Version 5.37 plus one update; Groom et al., 2016 ) with bridged dioxocines constituting the majority of the compounds reported. Of theses, only five molecules contain the same central imino-bridged [1,5]dioxocin core as in compound (I) (refcodes GAQNUJ, QAYTIU, TECMAP, UCERIE, XESBON). Clearly, substituents on the aromatic rings and on the bridging imino N atom in the five compounds determine the differences in their folding angles, which fall in the range 78.49–96.84°. However, no obvious correlation between the nature/size/position of the substituents and widening of the folding angle can be established due to the small number of compounds involved. While an example of [1,5]iminodioxocin bridgehead N-atom coordination to a metal atom (copper) has been reported (refcode XESBON; Mandal et al., 2006), the Zn atom did not demonstrate the ability to coordinate the ligand (I) in the present study.

5. Synthesis and crystallization

2-Hydroxy-3-methoxy-benzaldehyde (0.23 g, 1.5 mmol) and methylamine hydrochloride (0.10 g, 1.5 mmol) were added to methanol (5 ml) and stirred magnetically for 10 min. Zn(CH₃COO)₂·2H₂O (0.11 g, 0.5 mmol) dissolved in 5 ml dimethylformamide was added to the yellow solution of the Schiff base formed in situ, and the resulting deep-yellow solution was stirred at room temperature for an hour. The addition of N(Et)₃ (1 ml) produced a light precipitate which was filtered off. The solution, which was kept cold (283–285 K), changed colour from yellow to brown. It was diluted twice with methanol (4 ml) since it was thickening. Brown plate-like crystals of the title compound formed over two months after successive addition of PrⁱOH (4 ml) in two portions. They were collected by filter-suction, washed with dry PrⁱOH and finally dried in air (yield: 23%). Analysis calculated for C₁₇H₁₇NO₄ (299.31): C, 68.21; H, 5.72; N, 4.68%. Found: C, 68.55; H, 5.49; N, 4.87%. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆, s, singlet; m, multiplet): δ (ppm) 6.89–6.79, m (6H, benzene rings); 5.69, s (2H, dioxocin ring); 3.71, s (6H, OCH₃); 2.51, s (3H, NCH₃). The IR spectrum of powdered (I) in the range 4000–400 cm⁻¹ shows all characteristic functional groups peaks: ν(CH) due to aromatic =C—H and alkyl –C—H stretching above and below 3000, respectively, the aromatic rings vibrations in the 1600–1400 region, ν(CO) and ν(CN) at 1300–1000 and aromatic CH bending in the 900–600 cm⁻¹ region (see Supporting information).

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. All hydrogen atoms bound to carbon were included in calculated positions and refined using a riding model with isotropic displacement parameters based on those of the parent atom (C—H = 0.95 Å, U_iso(H) = 1.2U_eqC for CH, C—H = 0.98 Å, U_iso(H) = 1.5U_eqC for CH₃). Anisotropic displacement parameters were employed for the non-hydrogen atoms.

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	C₁₇H₁₇NO₄
M_r	299.31
Crystal system, space group	Triclinic, P $[\overline{1}]$
Temperature (K)	100
a, b, c (Å)	6.9956 (5), 8.8589 (6), 12.0938 (9)
α, β, γ (°)	93.980 (6), 106.603 (7), 102.133 (6)
V (Å³)	695.46 (9)
Z	2
Radiation type	Cu Kα
μ (mm⁻¹)	0.84
Crystal size (mm)	0.18 × 0.06 × 0.04

Data collection
Diffractometer	Oxford Diffraction Gemini
Absorption correction	Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2015 $[Rigaku OD (2015). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, England.]$ )
T_min, T_max	0.818, 1
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	5235, 2456, 2147
R_int	0.027
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.598

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.041, 0.121, 1.07
No. of reflections	2456
No. of parameters	202
H-atom treatment	H-atom parameters constrained
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.22, −0.25
Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2015 $[Rigaku OD (2015). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, England.]$ ), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015b ), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999 ), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006 ) and WinGX (Farrugia, 1999 ).

Supporting information

CCDC reference: 1532218

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017002328/hg5482sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017002328/hg5482Isup2.hkl

IR spectrum in KBr. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017002328/hg5482sup3.pdf

Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017002328/hg5482Isup4.cml

checkCIF report

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2015); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2015); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2015); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

4,10-Dimethoxy-13-methyl-6H,12H-6,12-epiminodibenzo[b,f][1,5]dioxocine top

Crystal data top

C₁₇H₁₇NO₄	Z = 2
M_r = 299.31	F(000) = 316
Triclinic, P1	D_x = 1.429 Mg m⁻³
Hall symbol: -P 1	Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
a = 6.9956 (5) Å	Cell parameters from 2735 reflections
b = 8.8589 (6) Å	θ = 3.9–67.1°
c = 12.0938 (9) Å	µ = 0.84 mm⁻¹
α = 93.980 (6)°	T = 100 K
β = 106.603 (7)°	Plate, brown
γ = 102.133 (6)°	0.18 × 0.06 × 0.04 mm
V = 695.46 (9) Å³

Data collection top

Oxford Diffraction Gemini diffractometer	2456 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed X-ray tube	2147 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Mirror monochromator	R_int = 0.027
Detector resolution: 10.4738 pixels mm^-1	θ_max = 67.2°, θ_min = 3.9°
ω scans	h = −8→8
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2015)	k = −9→10
T_min = 0.818, T_max = 1	l = −12→14
5235 measured reflections

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	0 restraints
Least-squares matrix: full	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.041	H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F²) = 0.121	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0737P)² + 0.1321P] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
S = 1.07	(Δ/σ)_max < 0.001
2456 reflections	Δρ_max = 0.22 e Å⁻³
202 parameters	Δρ_min = −0.25 e Å⁻³

Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
C1	0.8680 (3)	0.77719 (18)	0.96792 (13)	0.0272 (4)
H1A	1.0173	0.8034	1.0043	0.041*
H1B	0.802	0.8059	1.0249	0.041*
H1C	0.8334	0.8345	0.9014	0.041*
N1	0.7947 (2)	0.60859 (15)	0.92762 (11)	0.0239 (3)
C11	0.6973 (2)	0.64283 (16)	0.69544 (13)	0.0208 (3)
O11	0.89314 (15)	0.63442 (12)	0.75392 (9)	0.0216 (3)
C12	0.5341 (2)	0.60187 (17)	0.74052 (13)	0.0220 (3)
C121	0.5761 (2)	0.56411 (17)	0.86455 (13)	0.0234 (3)
H121	0.5042	0.624	0.9056	0.028*
C13	0.3363 (2)	0.60620 (17)	0.67238 (14)	0.0248 (3)
H13	0.2232	0.5779	0.7016	0.03*
C14	0.3059 (2)	0.65148 (18)	0.56296 (14)	0.0260 (4)
H14	0.1707	0.6494	0.5159	0.031*
C15	0.4714 (2)	0.70032 (17)	0.52068 (13)	0.0245 (3)
H15	0.4492	0.7351	0.4465	0.029*
C16	0.6678 (2)	0.69812 (17)	0.58676 (13)	0.0217 (3)
O16	0.84270 (16)	0.74649 (12)	0.55663 (9)	0.0252 (3)
C161	0.8176 (3)	0.80636 (19)	0.44818 (13)	0.0280 (4)
H16A	0.7297	0.7244	0.3846	0.042*
H16B	0.9522	0.8411	0.4367	0.042*
H16C	0.7536	0.8946	0.4488	0.042*
C21	0.6140 (2)	0.31265 (18)	0.82770 (12)	0.0214 (3)
O21	0.50055 (16)	0.40035 (12)	0.86700 (9)	0.0242 (3)
C22	0.8031 (2)	0.37774 (17)	0.81425 (12)	0.0215 (3)
C221	0.8989 (2)	0.55005 (17)	0.85422 (13)	0.0218 (3)
H221	1.0459	0.563	0.9011	0.026*
C23	0.9039 (2)	0.28166 (18)	0.76738 (13)	0.0232 (3)
H23	1.033	0.3251	0.7573	0.028*
C24	0.8164 (2)	0.12416 (18)	0.73579 (13)	0.0241 (3)
H24	0.8838	0.0603	0.7017	0.029*
C25	0.6289 (2)	0.05727 (18)	0.75355 (13)	0.0235 (3)
H25	0.5711	−0.0517	0.7332	0.028*
C26	0.5290 (2)	0.15091 (18)	0.80075 (13)	0.0225 (3)
O26	0.34536 (17)	0.10158 (12)	0.82185 (10)	0.0275 (3)
C261	0.2625 (3)	−0.06296 (19)	0.80651 (16)	0.0326 (4)
H26A	0.2318	−0.1056	0.7247	0.049*
H26B	0.1359	−0.0843	0.8284	0.049*
H26C	0.3628	−0.1118	0.8559	0.049*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
C1	0.0350 (9)	0.0211 (8)	0.0248 (8)	0.0057 (7)	0.0094 (7)	0.0021 (6)
N1	0.0294 (7)	0.0195 (7)	0.0237 (6)	0.0051 (5)	0.0100 (5)	0.0035 (5)
C11	0.0217 (7)	0.0147 (7)	0.0253 (7)	0.0047 (6)	0.0061 (6)	0.0013 (5)
O11	0.0214 (5)	0.0201 (5)	0.0240 (6)	0.0041 (4)	0.0077 (4)	0.0064 (4)
C12	0.0261 (8)	0.0138 (7)	0.0270 (8)	0.0045 (6)	0.0103 (6)	0.0020 (5)
C121	0.0282 (8)	0.0166 (7)	0.0290 (8)	0.0064 (6)	0.0134 (6)	0.0044 (6)
C13	0.0236 (8)	0.0165 (7)	0.0362 (8)	0.0042 (6)	0.0129 (6)	0.0023 (6)
C14	0.0239 (8)	0.0197 (8)	0.0331 (8)	0.0070 (6)	0.0057 (6)	0.0027 (6)
C15	0.0294 (8)	0.0199 (8)	0.0242 (7)	0.0073 (6)	0.0070 (6)	0.0043 (6)
C16	0.0250 (7)	0.0158 (7)	0.0253 (7)	0.0043 (6)	0.0099 (6)	0.0017 (6)
O16	0.0257 (6)	0.0272 (6)	0.0250 (6)	0.0060 (4)	0.0108 (4)	0.0084 (4)
C161	0.0327 (8)	0.0287 (9)	0.0257 (8)	0.0077 (7)	0.0125 (7)	0.0091 (6)
C21	0.0246 (7)	0.0202 (8)	0.0222 (7)	0.0080 (6)	0.0094 (6)	0.0046 (6)
O21	0.0282 (6)	0.0167 (6)	0.0330 (6)	0.0060 (4)	0.0169 (5)	0.0052 (4)
C22	0.0240 (7)	0.0201 (8)	0.0203 (7)	0.0054 (6)	0.0060 (6)	0.0063 (6)
C221	0.0239 (7)	0.0205 (8)	0.0218 (7)	0.0048 (6)	0.0075 (6)	0.0072 (6)
C23	0.0221 (7)	0.0261 (8)	0.0240 (7)	0.0073 (6)	0.0092 (6)	0.0075 (6)
C24	0.0281 (8)	0.0236 (8)	0.0251 (7)	0.0125 (6)	0.0101 (6)	0.0052 (6)
C25	0.0280 (8)	0.0176 (8)	0.0258 (7)	0.0063 (6)	0.0089 (6)	0.0046 (6)
C26	0.0227 (7)	0.0218 (8)	0.0249 (7)	0.0060 (6)	0.0091 (6)	0.0065 (6)
O26	0.0277 (6)	0.0177 (6)	0.0415 (6)	0.0035 (4)	0.0183 (5)	0.0060 (4)
C261	0.0319 (9)	0.0183 (8)	0.0505 (10)	0.0024 (7)	0.0196 (8)	0.0064 (7)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

C1—N1	1.4716 (19)	O16—C161	1.4271 (18)
C1—H1A	0.98	C161—H16A	0.98
C1—H1B	0.98	C161—H16B	0.98
C1—H1C	0.98	C161—H16C	0.98
N1—C221	1.433 (2)	C21—O21	1.3723 (18)
N1—C121	1.454 (2)	C21—C22	1.387 (2)
C11—O11	1.3707 (18)	C21—C26	1.407 (2)
C11—C12	1.394 (2)	C22—C23	1.399 (2)
C11—C16	1.410 (2)	C22—C221	1.515 (2)
O11—C221	1.4636 (17)	C221—H221	1
C12—C13	1.403 (2)	C23—C24	1.379 (2)
C12—C121	1.519 (2)	C23—H23	0.95
C121—O21	1.4413 (18)	C24—C25	1.403 (2)
C121—H121	1	C24—H24	0.95
C13—C14	1.381 (2)	C25—C26	1.381 (2)
C13—H13	0.95	C25—H25	0.95
C14—C15	1.395 (2)	C26—O26	1.3690 (19)
C14—H14	0.95	O26—C261	1.4286 (18)
C15—C16	1.382 (2)	C261—H26A	0.98
C15—H15	0.95	C261—H26B	0.98
C16—O16	1.3675 (19)	C261—H26C	0.98

N1—C1—H1A	109.5	H16A—C161—H16B	109.5
N1—C1—H1B	109.5	O16—C161—H16C	109.5
H1A—C1—H1B	109.5	H16A—C161—H16C	109.5
N1—C1—H1C	109.5	H16B—C161—H16C	109.5
H1A—C1—H1C	109.5	O21—C21—C22	122.61 (14)
H1B—C1—H1C	109.5	O21—C21—C26	116.68 (13)
C221—N1—C121	107.32 (12)	C22—C21—C26	120.72 (14)
C221—N1—C1	114.33 (12)	C21—O21—C121	111.48 (11)
C121—N1—C1	112.09 (12)	C21—C22—C23	119.15 (14)
O11—C11—C12	122.53 (13)	C21—C22—C221	119.33 (13)
O11—C11—C16	116.70 (13)	C23—C22—C221	121.48 (13)
C12—C11—C16	120.76 (13)	N1—C221—O11	111.99 (12)
C11—O11—C221	111.80 (11)	N1—C221—C22	109.13 (12)
C11—C12—C13	118.88 (14)	O11—C221—C22	110.50 (11)
C11—C12—C121	119.41 (13)	N1—C221—H221	108.4
C13—C12—C121	121.58 (13)	O11—C221—H221	108.4
O21—C121—N1	108.62 (12)	C22—C221—H221	108.4
O21—C121—C12	111.51 (12)	C24—C23—C22	120.23 (14)
N1—C121—C12	111.31 (12)	C24—C23—H23	119.9
O21—C121—H121	108.4	C22—C23—H23	119.9
N1—C121—H121	108.4	C23—C24—C25	120.62 (14)
C12—C121—H121	108.4	C23—C24—H24	119.7
C14—C13—C12	120.10 (14)	C25—C24—H24	119.7
C14—C13—H13	120	C26—C25—C24	119.59 (14)
C12—C13—H13	120	C26—C25—H25	120.2
C13—C14—C15	120.80 (14)	C24—C25—H25	120.2
C13—C14—H14	119.6	O26—C26—C25	125.72 (14)
C15—C14—H14	119.6	O26—C26—C21	114.69 (13)
C16—C15—C14	119.99 (14)	C25—C26—C21	119.56 (14)
C16—C15—H15	120	C26—O26—C261	116.82 (12)
C14—C15—H15	120	O26—C261—H26A	109.5
O16—C16—C15	125.65 (14)	O26—C261—H26B	109.5
O16—C16—C11	115.10 (13)	H26A—C261—H26B	109.5
C15—C16—C11	119.24 (14)	O26—C261—H26C	109.5
C16—O16—C161	116.22 (11)	H26A—C261—H26C	109.5
O16—C161—H16A	109.5	H26B—C261—H26C	109.5
O16—C161—H16B	109.5

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
C13—H13···O11ⁱ	0.95	2.69	3.5616 (19)	152
C1—H1B···O26ⁱⁱ	0.98	2.53	3.508 (2)	176

Symmetry codes: (i) x−1, y, z; (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+2.

References

Brandenburg, K. (1999). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Chygorin, E. N., Nesterova, O. V., Rusanova, J. A., Kokozay, V. N., Bon, V. V., Boča, R. & Ozarowski, A. (2012). Inorg. Chem. 51, 386–396. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dolenský, B., Havlík, M. & Král, V. (2012). Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 3839–3858. PubMed Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Filarowski, A., Koll, A., Glowiak, T., Majewski, E. & Dziembowska, T. (1998). Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie, 102, 393–402. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hardouin-Lerouge, M., Hudhomme, P. & Sallé, M. (2011). Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 30–43. CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Macrae, C. F., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Shields, G. P., Taylor, R., Towler, M. & van de Streek, J. (2006). J. Appl. Cryst. 39, 453–457. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Mandal, D., Wu, A. Q., Guo, G. C. & Ray, D. (2006). Inorg. Chem. 45, 8826–8828. CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Meally, S. T., McDonald, C., Karotsis, G., Papaefstathiou, G. S., Brechin, E. K., Dunne, P. W., McArdle, P., Power, N. P. & Jones, L. F. (2010). Dalton Trans. 39, 4809–4816. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Minder, B., Schürch, M., Mallat, T. & Baiker, A. (1995). Catal. Lett. 31, 143–151. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Nesterova, O. V., Chygorin, E. N., Kokozay, V. N., Bon, V. V., Omelchenko, I. V., Shishkin, O. V., Titiš, J., Boča, R., Pombeiro, A. J. & Ozarowski, A. (2013). Dalton Trans. 42, 16909–16919. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rigaku OD (2015). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction Ltd, Yarnton, England. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sydoruk, T. V., Buvaylo, E. A., Kokozay, V. N., Vassilyeva, O. Y. & Skelton, B. W. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, m551–m552. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wilen, S. H., Qi, J. Z. & Williard, P. G. (1991). J. Org. Chem. 56, 485–487. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.