Crystal structure of 4,4′-di­nitro-[1,1′-biphen­yl]-2-amine

Faizi, M.S.H.; Haque, A.; Dege, N.; Hasan, S.I.; Dege, M.; Kalibabchuk, V.A.

doi:10.1107/S205698901700408X

research communications

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 73| Part 4| April 2017| Pages 550-552

https://doi.org/10.1107/S205698901700408X

Open

access

Crystal structure of 4,4′-dinitro-[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-amine

Md. Serajul Haque Faizi,^a Ashanul Haque,^a Necmi Dege,^b Syed Imran Hasan,^a Mustafa Dege ^c and Valentina A. Kalibabchuk ^d ^*

^aDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Sultan Qaboos University, PO Box 36 Al-Khod 123, Muscat, Sultanate of , Oman, ^bOndokuz Mayıs University, Arts and Sciences Faculty, Department of Physics, 55139 Samsun, Turkey, ^cSpraying Systems Company Turkey, Esentepe Mah. Kore Şehitleri Cad. Kaya Aldoğan Sok., Serhan apt. No. 3 Daire:3 Şişli İstanbul, Turkey, and ^dDepartment of General Chemistry, O. O. Bohomolets National Medical University, Shevchenko Blvd. 13, 01601 Kiev, Ukraine
^*Correspondence e-mail: kalibabchuk@ukr.net

Edited by H. Stoeckli-Evans, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland (Received 17 February 2017; accepted 13 March 2017; online 21 March 2017)

In the title biphenyl derivative, C₁₂H₉N₃O₄, the dihedral angle between the benzene rings is 52.84 (10)°. The nitro group attached to the benzene ring is inclined to the ring by 4.03 (2)°, while the nitro group attached to the amino-substituted benzene ring is inclined to the ring by 8.84 (2)°. In the crystal, molecules are linked by two pairs of N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming chains propagating along [101]. Within the chains, these N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds result in the formation of R₂²(20) and R₂²(14) ring motifs. The latter ring motif is reinforced by a pair of C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, enclosing R₂¹(6) ring motifs. The chains are linked by a second C—H⋯O hydrogen bond, forming a three-dimensional supramolecular structure.

Keywords: crystal structure; dinitro; biphenyl; amine; biphenyl derivatives; hydrogen bonding.

CCDC reference: 1537734

1. Chemical context

Biphenyl and its derivatives have been shown to play an important role in fighting cancer and arteriosclerosis in humans (Umeda et al., 2005 ). The dihedral angle between the phenyl rings of biphenyl derivatives is associated with their affinity for cellular target molecules and, therefore, can correlate with their toxicity. The parent compound, biphenyl, adopts a planar conformation in the solid state with a dihedral angle of 0° (Trotter, 1961 ). The calculated dihedral angle for biphenyl derivatives without ortho substituents is ca 41° (Shaikh et al., 2008 ). Deviations from the energetically most favourable conformation are most likely the result of crystal packing effects, which allow such compounds to adopt an energetically favorable conformation in the solid state by maximizing the lattice energy. Many research groups have calculated the inter-ring torsion angle of biphenyl in the solid state (Brock, 1980 ; Brock & Minton, 1989 ; Bastiansen & Samdal, 1985 ), and in the gas phase (Bastiansen & Traetteberg, 1962 ). We report here a detailed description of the molecular structure and supramolecular features of the title biphenyl derivative, 4,4′-dinitro-[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-amine, (I).

2. Structural commentary

The molecular structure of the title compound (I), is illustrated in Fig. 1. The dihedral angle between the two rings of the biphenyl unit is 52.84 (10)°. The nitro group (N3/O3/O4) is inclined to the benzene ring (C7–C12) to which it is attached by 4.03 (2)°. The nitro group (N1/O1/O2) is inclined to the amino-substituted benzene ring (C1–C6), to which it is attached, by 8.84 (2)°. The amino N atom, N2, lies in the plane of the C1–C6 benzene ring, and the N2—C5 bond length of 1.375 (3) Å clearly indicates a single bond. The C1—N1 distance of 1.466 (3) Å is slightly less than the C10—N3 bond distance of 1.477 (3) Å, which indicates that the 2-amino group containing a benzene ring (C1–C6) is more conjugated with the nitro group (N1/O1/O2) than is the other nitro group (N3/O3/O4) with respect to the C7–C12 benzene ring. The bond length of the C4—C7 bridge is 1.482 (3) Å, which indicates a single bond, and is similar to the same bond length of 1.494 (2) Å reported for dimethyl 2,2′-dinitrobiphenyl-4,4′-dicarboxylate (Lehane et al., 2014 ), and ca 1.493 Å observed in 2,2′-dinitrobiphenyl (Sekine et al., 1994 ).

Figure 1
The molecular structure of the title compound, with the atom labelling. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 40% probability level.

3. Supramolecular features

In the crystal, molecules are linked by two pairs of N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming chains propagating along the [101] direction. Within the chains, these N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds result in the formation of R₂²(20) and R₂²(14) ring motifs (Table 1 and Fig. 2). The latter ring motif is reinforced by a pair of C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, enclosing R₂¹(6) ring motifs (Table 1 and Fig. 2). The chains are linked by a second C—H⋯O hydrogen bond (Table 1), forming a three-dimensional supramolecular structure, as illustrated in Figs. 3 and 4.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
N2—H2B⋯O1ⁱ	0.92 (2)	2.36 (2)	3.229 (3)	157 (2)
N2—H2A⋯O4ⁱⁱ	0.89 (2)	2.50 (2)	3.345 (3)	157 (2)
C6—H6⋯O1ⁱ	0.93	2.54	3.308 (3)	140
C9—H9⋯O3ⁱⁱⁱ	0.93	2.57	3.496 (3)	174
Symmetry codes: (i) -x+1, -y+1, -z+2; (ii) -x, -y+1, -z+1; (iii) $[-x, y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}]$ .

Figure 2
A view of the N—H⋯O and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (dashed lines; see Table 1

), in the crystal of (I)

, forming chains that propagate along [101].

Figure 3
A view along the b axis of the crystal packing of (I)

. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines (see Table 1

) and, for clarity, only H atoms H2A, H2B, H6 and H9 have been included.

Figure 4
A view along the a axis of the crystal packing of (I)

. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines (see Table 1

) and, for clarity, only H atoms H2A, H2B, H6 and H9 have been included.

4. Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.38, update February 2017; Groom et al., 2016 ) revealed the structure of two similar compounds viz 4′-nitro-2-biphenylamine (II) (CSD refcode DIWFEU; Sutherland & Ali-Adib, 1986 ) and 4,4′-dinitrobiphenyl (III) (DNTDPH; Boonstra, 1963 ). In (II), the benzene rings are inclined to one another by 54.64 (6)°, compared to ca 32.91° in (III), and to 52.84 (2)° in the title compound (I). In (II), the nitro group is inclined to the benzene ring to which it is attached by 7.08 (6)°, compared to ca 3.55 and 10.14° in (III) and 8.3 (2)° in the title compound (I).

5. Synthesis and crystallization

The title compound (I), was prepared by a literature procedure (Ol'khovik et al., 2008 ). Orange prismatic crystals, suitable for single-crystal X-ray analysis, were grown by slow evaporation of a solution in ethanol.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. The N-bound H atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and refined with U_iso(H) = 1.2U_eq(N). The C-bound H atoms were included in calculated positions and refined as riding: C—H = 0.93–0.96 Å with U_iso(H) = 1.2U_eq(C).

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	C₁₂H₉N₃O₄
M_r	259.22
Crystal system, space group	Monoclinic, P2₁/c
Temperature (K)	296
a, b, c (Å)	14.2940 (11), 7.0352 (6), 11.6043 (9)
β (°)	99.437 (6)
V (Å³)	1151.15 (16)
Z	4
Radiation type	Mo Kα
μ (mm⁻¹)	0.12
Crystal size (mm)	0.34 × 0.20 × 0.07

Data collection
Diffractometer	Stoe IPDS 2
Absorption correction	Integration (X-RED32; Stoe & Cie, 2002 )
T_min, T_max	0.980, 0.993
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	6476, 2566, 1052
R_int	0.044
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.646

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.040, 0.092, 0.81
No. of reflections	2566
No. of parameters	180
No. of restraints	2
H-atom treatment	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.10, −0.12
Computer programs: X-AREA and X-RED32 (Stoe & Cie, 2002), SHELXT (Sheldrick 2015a ), SHELXL2016 (Sheldrick, 2015b ), ORTEP-3 for Windows and WinGX (Farrugia, 2012 ), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ).

Supporting information

CCDC reference: 1537734

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S205698901700408X/su5355sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S205698901700408X/su5355Isup2.hkl

Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S205698901700408X/su5355Isup3.cml

checkCIF report

Computing details top

Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2002); cell refinement: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2002); data reduction: X-RED32 (Stoe & Cie, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT (Sheldrick 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2016 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 2012) and PLATON (Spek, 2009).

4,4'-Dinitro-[1,1'-biphenyl]-2-amine top

Crystal data top

C₁₂H₉N₃O₄	F(000) = 536
M_r = 259.22	D_x = 1.496 Mg m⁻³
Monoclinic, P2₁/c	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 14.2940 (11) Å	Cell parameters from 3570 reflections
b = 7.0352 (6) Å	θ = 2.1–27.8°
c = 11.6043 (9) Å	µ = 0.12 mm⁻¹
β = 99.437 (6)°	T = 296 K
V = 1151.15 (16) Å³	Prism, orange
Z = 4	0.34 × 0.20 × 0.07 mm

Data collection top

Stoe IPDS 2 diffractometer	2566 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed X-ray tube, 12 x 0.4 mm long-fine focus	1052 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Plane graphite monochromator	R_int = 0.044
Detector resolution: 6.67 pixels mm^-1	θ_max = 27.4°, θ_min = 2.9°
rotation method scans	h = −18→18
Absorption correction: integration (X-RED32; Stoe & Cie, 2002)	k = −8→9
T_min = 0.980, T_max = 0.993	l = −14→11
6476 measured reflections

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full	Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.040	Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F²) = 0.092	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 0.81	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0353P)²] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
2566 reflections	(Δ/σ)_max < 0.001
180 parameters	Δρ_max = 0.10 e Å⁻³
2 restraints	Δρ_min = −0.12 e Å⁻³

Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
O1	0.61664 (11)	0.3867 (2)	0.93876 (16)	0.0867 (5)
N1	0.60769 (13)	0.3912 (3)	0.8317 (2)	0.0701 (5)
O3	−0.08732 (12)	0.2401 (3)	0.36959 (17)	0.1108 (7)
O2	0.67457 (11)	0.3941 (3)	0.77943 (16)	0.1004 (6)
N2	0.26998 (16)	0.4451 (3)	0.8191 (2)	0.0831 (6)
N3	−0.02768 (15)	0.3445 (4)	0.3418 (2)	0.0899 (7)
O4	−0.04065 (12)	0.4408 (3)	0.25269 (19)	0.1165 (7)
C5	0.34478 (14)	0.4181 (3)	0.76003 (19)	0.0575 (5)
C6	0.43668 (14)	0.4150 (3)	0.82181 (19)	0.0597 (5)
H6	0.447162	0.429120	0.902589	0.072*
C4	0.33093 (14)	0.3924 (3)	0.63808 (18)	0.0578 (5)
C2	0.50098 (15)	0.3718 (3)	0.64471 (19)	0.0630 (6)
H2	0.553081	0.358487	0.606754	0.076*
C8	0.21562 (15)	0.4992 (3)	0.4654 (2)	0.0704 (6)
H8	0.260703	0.585579	0.448436	0.084*
C7	0.23591 (14)	0.3858 (3)	0.56438 (18)	0.0604 (5)
C1	0.51178 (14)	0.3912 (3)	0.76354 (19)	0.0565 (5)
C12	0.16757 (15)	0.2578 (3)	0.5889 (2)	0.0737 (6)
H12	0.180146	0.181271	0.655006	0.088*
C3	0.41015 (15)	0.3728 (3)	0.58389 (19)	0.0642 (6)
H3	0.401257	0.359785	0.503076	0.077*
C11	0.08146 (16)	0.2435 (3)	0.5161 (2)	0.0787 (7)
H11	0.035605	0.158226	0.532243	0.094*
C10	0.06496 (16)	0.3583 (4)	0.4192 (2)	0.0709 (6)
C9	0.13043 (16)	0.4857 (3)	0.3926 (2)	0.0754 (6)
H9	0.117272	0.561654	0.326283	0.090*
H2B	0.2854 (15)	0.490 (3)	0.8945 (17)	0.106 (9)*
H2A	0.2140 (13)	0.484 (4)	0.780 (2)	0.114 (10)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
O1	0.0876 (11)	0.1025 (13)	0.0647 (12)	0.0106 (9)	−0.0035 (9)	−0.0071 (11)
N1	0.0702 (12)	0.0638 (12)	0.0744 (15)	0.0050 (10)	0.0068 (12)	−0.0060 (12)
O3	0.0786 (11)	0.1494 (18)	0.1005 (16)	−0.0237 (12)	0.0033 (10)	−0.0310 (13)
O2	0.0715 (10)	0.1330 (15)	0.0988 (14)	−0.0058 (11)	0.0202 (10)	−0.0176 (12)
N2	0.0719 (13)	0.1179 (18)	0.0591 (14)	−0.0019 (12)	0.0092 (11)	−0.0076 (13)
N3	0.0814 (16)	0.1079 (19)	0.0760 (18)	0.0001 (13)	0.0000 (14)	−0.0284 (14)
O4	0.1077 (14)	0.1460 (18)	0.0828 (15)	0.0023 (12)	−0.0234 (11)	0.0033 (14)
C5	0.0680 (13)	0.0557 (13)	0.0501 (13)	−0.0050 (10)	0.0135 (11)	−0.0001 (10)
C6	0.0709 (13)	0.0582 (13)	0.0481 (12)	−0.0029 (10)	0.0045 (11)	0.0007 (10)
C4	0.0708 (13)	0.0515 (12)	0.0512 (13)	−0.0050 (10)	0.0102 (11)	0.0016 (11)
C2	0.0746 (14)	0.0591 (14)	0.0573 (15)	−0.0005 (11)	0.0171 (12)	−0.0026 (11)
C8	0.0774 (14)	0.0767 (15)	0.0542 (14)	−0.0036 (12)	0.0025 (12)	0.0066 (12)
C7	0.0715 (13)	0.0594 (13)	0.0490 (13)	−0.0049 (11)	0.0063 (11)	−0.0043 (11)
C1	0.0645 (12)	0.0457 (12)	0.0580 (15)	0.0001 (10)	0.0063 (11)	−0.0007 (11)
C12	0.0873 (15)	0.0735 (15)	0.0578 (15)	−0.0149 (13)	0.0047 (13)	0.0043 (13)
C3	0.0862 (15)	0.0601 (13)	0.0468 (13)	−0.0011 (11)	0.0123 (12)	0.0004 (11)
C11	0.0838 (16)	0.0794 (16)	0.0702 (18)	−0.0193 (13)	0.0045 (13)	−0.0057 (15)
C10	0.0702 (14)	0.0817 (17)	0.0562 (16)	0.0010 (12)	−0.0033 (12)	−0.0183 (13)
C9	0.0838 (15)	0.0808 (17)	0.0577 (15)	0.0032 (13)	0.0001 (13)	0.0054 (13)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

O1—N1	1.228 (2)	C2—C1	1.369 (3)
N1—O2	1.214 (2)	C2—C3	1.372 (3)
N1—C1	1.466 (3)	C2—H2	0.9300
O3—N3	1.209 (2)	C8—C9	1.367 (3)
N2—C5	1.375 (3)	C8—C7	1.389 (3)
N2—H2B	0.922 (17)	C8—H8	0.9300
N2—H2A	0.894 (17)	C7—C12	1.392 (3)
N3—O4	1.224 (3)	C12—C11	1.378 (3)
N3—C10	1.477 (3)	C12—H12	0.9300
C5—C6	1.390 (3)	C3—H3	0.9300
C5—C4	1.408 (3)	C11—C10	1.373 (3)
C6—C1	1.370 (3)	C11—H11	0.9300
C6—H6	0.9300	C10—C9	1.368 (3)
C4—C3	1.389 (3)	C9—H9	0.9300
C4—C7	1.482 (3)

O2—N1—O1	123.1 (2)	C7—C8—H8	119.5
O2—N1—C1	118.3 (2)	C8—C7—C12	118.8 (2)
O1—N1—C1	118.63 (19)	C8—C7—C4	120.41 (19)
C5—N2—H2B	115.9 (14)	C12—C7—C4	120.6 (2)
C5—N2—H2A	119.6 (17)	C2—C1—C6	122.8 (2)
H2B—N2—H2A	116 (2)	C2—C1—N1	119.0 (2)
O3—N3—O4	123.1 (2)	C6—C1—N1	118.2 (2)
O3—N3—C10	118.6 (3)	C11—C12—C7	120.5 (2)
O4—N3—C10	118.3 (3)	C11—C12—H12	119.7
N2—C5—C6	119.4 (2)	C7—C12—H12	119.7
N2—C5—C4	121.8 (2)	C2—C3—C4	122.7 (2)
C6—C5—C4	118.80 (19)	C2—C3—H3	118.6
C1—C6—C5	119.9 (2)	C4—C3—H3	118.6
C1—C6—H6	120.1	C10—C11—C12	118.4 (2)
C5—C6—H6	120.1	C10—C11—H11	120.8
C3—C4—C5	118.49 (19)	C12—C11—H11	120.8
C3—C4—C7	118.3 (2)	C9—C10—C11	122.6 (2)
C5—C4—C7	123.25 (18)	C9—C10—N3	119.0 (3)
C1—C2—C3	117.28 (19)	C11—C10—N3	118.4 (2)
C1—C2—H2	121.4	C8—C9—C10	118.6 (2)
C3—C2—H2	121.4	C8—C9—H9	120.7
C9—C8—C7	121.0 (2)	C10—C9—H9	120.7
C9—C8—H8	119.5

N2—C5—C6—C1	−179.0 (2)	O2—N1—C1—C6	−170.96 (19)
C4—C5—C6—C1	1.3 (3)	O1—N1—C1—C6	9.7 (3)
N2—C5—C4—C3	177.7 (2)	C8—C7—C12—C11	0.2 (3)
C6—C5—C4—C3	−2.6 (3)	C4—C7—C12—C11	−175.9 (2)
N2—C5—C4—C7	−2.1 (3)	C1—C2—C3—C4	0.0 (3)
C6—C5—C4—C7	177.60 (19)	C5—C4—C3—C2	2.0 (3)
C9—C8—C7—C12	−0.3 (3)	C7—C4—C3—C2	−178.2 (2)
C9—C8—C7—C4	175.8 (2)	C7—C12—C11—C10	0.0 (3)
C3—C4—C7—C8	−50.6 (3)	C12—C11—C10—C9	−0.1 (3)
C5—C4—C7—C8	129.1 (2)	C12—C11—C10—N3	−179.4 (2)
C3—C4—C7—C12	125.4 (2)	O3—N3—C10—C9	−175.5 (2)
C5—C4—C7—C12	−54.9 (3)	O4—N3—C10—C9	3.9 (3)
C3—C2—C1—C6	−1.4 (3)	O3—N3—C10—C11	3.8 (3)
C3—C2—C1—N1	−179.90 (18)	O4—N3—C10—C11	−176.8 (2)
C5—C6—C1—C2	0.7 (3)	C7—C8—C9—C10	0.2 (3)
C5—C6—C1—N1	179.24 (19)	C11—C10—C9—C8	0.0 (3)
O2—N1—C1—C2	7.6 (3)	N3—C10—C9—C8	179.3 (2)
O1—N1—C1—C2	−171.76 (19)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
N2—H2B···O1ⁱ	0.92 (2)	2.36 (2)	3.229 (3)	157 (2)
N2—H2A···O4ⁱⁱ	0.89 (2)	2.50 (2)	3.345 (3)	157 (2)
C6—H6···O1ⁱ	0.93	2.54	3.308 (3)	140
C9—H9···O3ⁱⁱⁱ	0.93	2.57	3.496 (3)	174

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+2; (ii) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (iii) −x, y+1/2, −z+1/2.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Ondokuz Mayıs University, Arts and Sciences Faculty, Department of Physics, 55139 Samsun, Turkey for X-ray the data collection.

Funding information

Funding for this research was provided by: Department of General Chemistry, O. O. Bohomolets National Medical University, Shevchenko Blvd. 13, 01601 Kiev.

References

Bastiansen, O. & Samdal, S. (1985). J. Mol. Struct. 128, 115–125. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bastiansen, O. & Traetteberg, M. (1962). Tetrahedron, 17, 147–154. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Boonstra, E. G. (1963). Acta Cryst. 16, 816–823. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Brock, C. P. (1980). Acta Cryst. B36, 968–971. CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Brock, C. P. & Minton, P. (1989). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 4586–4593. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Lehane, R. L., Golen, J. A., Rheingold, A. L. & Manke, D. R. (2014). Acta Cryst. E70, o305. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Ol'khovik, V. K., Pap, A. A., Vasilevskii, V. A., Galinovskii, N. A. & Tereshko, S. N. (2008). Russ. J. Org. Chem. 44, 1172–1179. CAS Google Scholar
Sekine, A., Ohashi, Y., Yoshimura, K., Yagi, M. & Higuchi, J. (1994). Acta Cryst. C50, 1101–1104. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Shaikh, N. S., Parkin, S., Luthe, G. & Lehmler, H.-J. (2008). Chemosphere, 70, 1694–1698. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Stoe & Cie (2002). X-AREA and X-RED32. Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany. Google Scholar
Sutherland, H. H. & Ali-Adib, Z. (1986). Acta Cryst. C42, 432–433. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Trotter, J. (1961). Acta Cryst. 14, 1135–1140. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Umeda, Y., Aiso, S., Yamazaki, K., Ohnishi, M., Arito, H., Nagano, K., Yamamoto, S. & Matsushima, T. (2005). J. Vet. Med. Sci. 67, 417–424. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar