research communications
Z,4Z)-2,4-dimethyl-3H-benzo[b][1,4]diazepine
of (1aDepartamento de Química Orgánica y Bio-orgánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Senda del Rey 9, E-28040 Madrid, Spain, bDepartamento de Química Inorgánica I, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, E-28040 Madrid, Spain, cCAI Difraccion de Rayos X, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, E-28040 Madrid, Spain, and dInstituto de Química Medica, Centro Química Orgánica Manuel Lora-Tamayo,(CSIC), Juan de la Cierva, 3, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
*Correspondence e-mail: torralba@ucm.es
The title compound, C11H12N2, is not planar due to the folding of the seven-membered ring. In the crystal, molecules are packed opposite each other to minimize the electronic repulsion but the long intermolecular distances indicate that no directional contacts are found.
Keywords: crystal structure; benzo[b][1,4]diazepine; 1,5-benzodiazepine.
CCDC reference: 1530551
1. Chemical context
(1Z,4Z)-2,4-Dimethyl-3H-benzo[b][1,4]diazepine, C11H12N2 (Me, Me) (1), also called a 1,5-benzodiazepine, is a molecule situated at the crossroad of many avenues of chemistry. This compound is associated with the names of Douglas Lloyd and Donald R. Marshall of the University of St Andrews in Scotland (Gibson et al., 2002). These authors reported the synthesis of 1, determined that its tautomeric structure is 1 and not 1′, and also determined that the protonation of 1 yields the cation 1H+ (Lloyd et al., 2002). For molecules such as 1H+ they introduced the term `quasi-aromatic' (Lloyd & Marshall, 1971), a term that has not survived the authors (Claramunt et al., 2013). The inversion barrier of the seven-membered ring of 1 was measured to be 48.9 kJ mol−1 (Mannschreck et al., 1967); our calculated value is 43.4 kJ mol−1 (Claramunt et al., 2013).
Benzo[b][1,4]diazepines continue to be the subject of many studies, but with other substituents (Bonacorso et al., 1996; El-Azab, 2013; Aastha et al., 2013; Solan et al., 2014; Young et al., 2016). Of the different procedures existing in the literature to prepare compound 1, we used the reaction of acetylacetone with o-phenylenediamine using silica-supported sulfuric acid as catalyst under solvent-free conditions (Chen et al., 2009). In spite of what the authors described in the paper, the reaction was not complete at room temperature and it was necessary to heat up to 273 K to attain a quantitative yield of the product, which was purified by on silica gel and crystallized from ethyl acetate/hexane solution presenting a melting point of 408 K. We report herein on its characterization by 1H, 13C and 15N NMR in solution and solid state spectroscopy and, since its X-ray molecular structure is unknown, we decided to complete the panorama of compound 1 determining it. Note that the structures of the monomethyl compound (Me, H) and the parent compound (H, H) are unknown, as well as those of their salts.
2. Structural commentary
The title compound 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic P21/c with one molecule in the (Fig. 1). As expected, the derivative is not planar due to the folding of the seven-membered ring. According to the electronic distribution for the two imine groups N1—C2 and N5—C4 [bond distances = 1.283 (3) and 1.281 (3) Å, respectively], atoms C2, C3 and C4 together with the two methyl groups of the diazepine ring deviate from the phenyl ring plane: atom C3 shows the largest displacement at 1.495 (1) Å while C2 and C4 are situated symmetrically at about 0.58 Å from it. The dihedral angle between the phenyl ring and C2/C3/C4 fragment of the diazepine ring is 87.8 (2)°, giving rise to a boat conformation for the diazepine ring.
It is noteworthy that this is the only example found in the CSD database (Groom et al., 2016) of a neutral diazepine derivative. For this reason, this structure is compared with the reported cationic diazepines C11H13N2+·X− [X = PF6− (Blake et al., 1991), Cl− (Speakman et al., 1976; Svensson & Timby, 1981) and ZnI42− (Orioli & Lip, 1974)] showing relevant structural differences. In the latter compounds, there is electronic delocalization in the N1/C2/C3/C4/N5 moiety that results in an almost planar geometry of this part of the seven-membered ring. However, in the neutral species, the C3 atom keeps both hydrogen atoms in an sp3 conformation, leading to localization of the double bonds between the nitrogen atoms and their adjacent carbon atoms, which induces a great deviation of this moiety from planarity (Fig. 2).
3. Supramolecular features
In the crystal, the molecules are packed opposite each other to minimize electronic repulsion but the long intermolecular distances indicate that no relevant contacts are found (Fig. 3). This feature differs from the salts previously mentioned, where the presence of the hydrogen atoms on the nitrogen atoms allows the formation of N—H⋯X hydrogen bonds, leading to different supramolecular networks. The absence of these atoms in 1, along with the boat conformation described above, prevents the formation of any supramolecular structure.
4. Synthesis and crystallization
All chemicals cited in the synthetic procedures are commercial compounds. Melting points were determined by DSC and thermograms (sample size 0.002–0.004 g) were recorded with a scan rate of 5.0 K min−1. was performed on silica gel 70–230 mesh. The NMR solution spectra were recorded on a 9.4 Tesla spectrometer (400.13 MHz for 1H, 100.62 MHz for 13C and 40.54 MHz for 15N) at 300 K with a 5 mm inverse detection H—X probe equipped with a z-gradient coil. Chemical shifts (δ in p.p.m.) are given from internal solvents: CDCl3 7.26 for 1H and 77.0 for 13C. Nitromethane was used for 15N as external reference. CPMAS NMR spectra were obtained on a 9.4 Tesla spectrometer at 300 K (100.73 MHz for 13C and 40.60 MHz for 15N) using a 4 mm DVT probehead at spinning rates of 12 and 6 kHz, respectively. 13C spectra were originally referenced to a glycine sample and then the chemical shifts were recalculated to the Me4Si (for the glycine carbonyl atom δ = 176.1 p.p.m.) and 15N spectra to 15NH4Cl and then converted to the nitromethane scale using the relationship: δ 15N (nitromethane) = δ 15N (ammonium chloride) − 338.1 p.p.m.. Samples were spun at the magic angle at rates of 25 kHz and the experiments were carried out at 300 K.
Synthesis of (1Z,4Z)-2,4-dimethyl-3H-benzo[b][1,4]diazepine (1): To a mixture of 2,4-pentanedione (100.12 mg, 1 mmol) and o-phenylenediamine (108.14 mg, 1 mmol), H2SO4·SiO2 (20 mg) was added. The mixture was heated with magnetic stirring at 373 K for 1 h. After completion of the reaction, the resulting black oil was purified using silica gel (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether, 60:40) and crystallized from ethyl acetate/hexane solution to give colourless prisms (90%). Rf (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether 80:20): 0.25. M.p (DSC) 408 K (Nishio et al., 1985, 403–405 K) 1H NMR (400.13 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.36 (dd, 3J = 6.0, 4J = 3.5, 2H, H7, H8), 7.21 (dd, 3J = 6.0, 4J = 3.5 Hz, 2H, H6, H9), 2.82 (br, 2H, H3), 2.35 (s, 6H, CH3). 13C NMR (100.62 MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.6 (q, 2J = 6.4 Hz, C2), 140.2 (dd, 3J = 3 J = 7.0 Hz, C5a, C9a), 127.5 (dddd 1J = 160.4, 3J = 7.4, 2J = 2J = 3.5 Hz, C7, C8), 124.8 (dd, 1J = 161.8, 2J = 8.7 Hz, C6, C9), 43.2 (tsep,1J = 134.5, 3 J = 2.8 Hz, C3), 27.6 (qt, 1J = 128.0, 3J = 2.5 Hz, CH3). 15N NMR (40.54 MHz, CDCl3) δ −74.1. 13C SSNMR (100.76 MHz, CPMAS) δ 162.9 and 161.5 (C2, C6), 142.2 (C5a, C9a), 128.0 (C7, C8), 125.5 and 124.6 (C6/C9), 43.1 (C3), 27.6 (CH3). 15N SSNMR (40.60 MHz, CPMAS) δ −69.7.
5. Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure . Hydrogen atoms were included in their calculated positions (C—H = 0.93–0.97Å) and refined riding on the respective carbon atoms with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) or 1.5Ueq(C) for methyl H atoms.
details are summarized in Table 1Supporting information
CCDC reference: 1530551
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017004972/hb7662sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017004972/hb7662Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017004972/hb7662Isup3.mol
Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017004972/hb7662Isup4.cml
Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2004); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2004); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2004); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).C11H12N2 | F(000) = 368 |
Mr = 172.23 | Dx = 1.201 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 11.8226 (16) Å | Cell parameters from 974 reflections |
b = 6.6305 (9) Å | θ = 3.1–20.1° |
c = 13.3557 (19) Å | µ = 0.07 mm−1 |
β = 114.531 (3)° | T = 296 K |
V = 952.4 (2) Å3 | Prismatic, colorless |
Z = 4 | 0.18 × 0.13 × 0.10 mm |
Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer | 878 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube | Rint = 0.072 |
Graphite monochromator | θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 1.9° |
phi and ω scans | h = −13→14 |
7529 measured reflections | k = −8→8 |
1876 independent reflections | l = −16→12 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.051 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.146 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.99 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.060P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
1876 reflections | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
118 parameters | Δρmax = 0.18 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.15 e Å−3 |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
N1 | 0.3543 (2) | 0.4619 (3) | 0.32401 (16) | 0.0491 (6) | |
C2 | 0.3699 (2) | 0.6414 (4) | 0.2963 (2) | 0.0490 (7) | |
C3 | 0.2695 (3) | 0.7496 (4) | 0.2027 (2) | 0.0551 (8) | |
H3A | 0.1911 | 0.7421 | 0.2095 | 0.066* | |
H3B | 0.2911 | 0.8904 | 0.2011 | 0.066* | |
C4 | 0.2606 (2) | 0.6429 (4) | 0.1002 (2) | 0.0511 (7) | |
C5A | 0.1784 (2) | 0.3600 (4) | 0.1489 (2) | 0.0415 (6) | |
N5 | 0.21672 (19) | 0.4640 (3) | 0.07648 (17) | 0.0498 (6) | |
C6 | 0.0737 (2) | 0.2360 (4) | 0.0995 (2) | 0.0542 (7) | |
H6 | 0.0330 | 0.2313 | 0.0231 | 0.065* | |
C7 | 0.0299 (3) | 0.1214 (4) | 0.1614 (3) | 0.0631 (8) | |
H7 | −0.0415 | 0.0439 | 0.1274 | 0.076* | |
C8 | 0.0930 (3) | 0.1223 (4) | 0.2750 (3) | 0.0602 (8) | |
H8 | 0.0635 | 0.0462 | 0.3176 | 0.072* | |
C9 | 0.1986 (3) | 0.2348 (4) | 0.3245 (2) | 0.0502 (7) | |
H9 | 0.2428 | 0.2284 | 0.4005 | 0.060* | |
C9A | 0.2416 (2) | 0.3593 (3) | 0.2635 (2) | 0.0402 (6) | |
C10 | 0.4921 (3) | 0.7461 (5) | 0.3555 (3) | 0.0776 (10) | |
H10A | 0.5475 | 0.6599 | 0.4125 | 0.116* | |
H10B | 0.4795 | 0.8690 | 0.3875 | 0.116* | |
H10C | 0.5277 | 0.7765 | 0.3043 | 0.116* | |
C11 | 0.3111 (3) | 0.7471 (5) | 0.0277 (2) | 0.0799 (10) | |
H11A | 0.3008 | 0.6616 | −0.0335 | 0.120* | |
H11B | 0.3979 | 0.7752 | 0.0692 | 0.120* | |
H11C | 0.2671 | 0.8713 | 0.0011 | 0.120* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
N1 | 0.0538 (15) | 0.0523 (13) | 0.0416 (13) | −0.0049 (12) | 0.0203 (11) | −0.0059 (11) |
C2 | 0.0515 (18) | 0.0539 (17) | 0.0451 (16) | −0.0062 (16) | 0.0236 (14) | −0.0099 (15) |
C3 | 0.0600 (19) | 0.0378 (14) | 0.073 (2) | 0.0002 (14) | 0.0327 (16) | 0.0001 (15) |
C4 | 0.0464 (17) | 0.0558 (17) | 0.0468 (17) | 0.0072 (15) | 0.0151 (13) | 0.0147 (15) |
C5A | 0.0424 (16) | 0.0413 (14) | 0.0422 (16) | 0.0054 (13) | 0.0191 (13) | −0.0004 (13) |
N5 | 0.0508 (14) | 0.0570 (14) | 0.0399 (13) | 0.0007 (12) | 0.0173 (11) | 0.0043 (12) |
C6 | 0.0423 (18) | 0.0525 (16) | 0.0603 (19) | 0.0003 (14) | 0.0138 (15) | −0.0073 (15) |
C7 | 0.0497 (19) | 0.0468 (17) | 0.090 (3) | −0.0045 (14) | 0.0267 (19) | −0.0044 (17) |
C8 | 0.069 (2) | 0.0457 (17) | 0.080 (2) | −0.0021 (16) | 0.0448 (19) | 0.0037 (16) |
C9 | 0.062 (2) | 0.0426 (15) | 0.0522 (17) | 0.0007 (14) | 0.0304 (15) | 0.0014 (13) |
C9A | 0.0424 (15) | 0.0377 (13) | 0.0438 (16) | 0.0018 (12) | 0.0211 (13) | −0.0043 (13) |
C10 | 0.064 (2) | 0.080 (2) | 0.081 (2) | −0.0249 (17) | 0.0227 (18) | −0.0128 (18) |
C11 | 0.089 (2) | 0.087 (2) | 0.069 (2) | −0.0131 (19) | 0.0372 (19) | 0.0183 (18) |
N1—C2 | 1.283 (3) | C6—H6 | 0.9300 |
N1—C9A | 1.412 (3) | C7—C8 | 1.385 (4) |
C2—C10 | 1.499 (4) | C7—H7 | 0.9300 |
C2—C3 | 1.502 (3) | C8—C9 | 1.367 (4) |
C3—C4 | 1.505 (3) | C8—H8 | 0.9300 |
C3—H3A | 0.9700 | C9—C9A | 1.396 (3) |
C3—H3B | 0.9700 | C9—H9 | 0.9300 |
C4—N5 | 1.281 (3) | C10—H10A | 0.9600 |
C4—C11 | 1.500 (4) | C10—H10B | 0.9600 |
C5A—C9A | 1.396 (3) | C10—H10C | 0.9600 |
C5A—N5 | 1.407 (3) | C11—H11A | 0.9600 |
C5A—C6 | 1.402 (3) | C11—H11B | 0.9600 |
C6—C7 | 1.373 (4) | C11—H11C | 0.9600 |
C2—N1—C9A | 119.7 (2) | C6—C7—H7 | 120.3 |
N1—C2—C10 | 120.0 (3) | C9—C8—C7 | 120.1 (3) |
N1—C2—C3 | 121.7 (2) | C9—C8—H8 | 120.0 |
C10—C2—C3 | 118.3 (3) | C7—C8—H8 | 120.0 |
C4—C3—C2 | 105.4 (2) | C8—C9—C9A | 121.4 (3) |
C4—C3—H3A | 110.7 | C8—C9—H9 | 119.3 |
C2—C3—H3A | 110.7 | C9A—C9—H9 | 119.3 |
C4—C3—H3B | 110.7 | C5A—C9A—C9 | 118.9 (2) |
C2—C3—H3B | 110.7 | C5A—C9A—N1 | 125.0 (2) |
H3A—C3—H3B | 108.8 | C9—C9A—N1 | 115.8 (2) |
N5—C4—C3 | 121.9 (2) | C2—C10—H10A | 109.5 |
N5—C4—C11 | 119.7 (3) | C2—C10—H10B | 109.5 |
C3—C4—C11 | 118.3 (3) | H10A—C10—H10B | 109.5 |
C9A—C5A—N5 | 125.2 (2) | C2—C10—H10C | 109.5 |
C9A—C5A—C6 | 118.7 (2) | H10A—C10—H10C | 109.5 |
N5—C5A—C6 | 115.9 (2) | H10B—C10—H10C | 109.5 |
C4—N5—C5A | 119.8 (2) | C4—C11—H11A | 109.5 |
C7—C6—C5A | 121.4 (3) | C4—C11—H11B | 109.5 |
C7—C6—H6 | 119.3 | H11A—C11—H11B | 109.5 |
C5A—C6—H6 | 119.3 | C4—C11—H11C | 109.5 |
C8—C7—C6 | 119.4 (3) | H11A—C11—H11C | 109.5 |
C8—C7—H7 | 120.3 | H11B—C11—H11C | 109.5 |
C9A—N1—C2—C10 | −176.0 (2) | C5A—C6—C7—C8 | −2.4 (4) |
C9A—N1—C2—C3 | 1.9 (3) | C6—C7—C8—C9 | −0.7 (4) |
N1—C2—C3—C4 | −70.2 (3) | C7—C8—C9—C9A | 3.6 (4) |
C10—C2—C3—C4 | 107.8 (3) | N5—C5A—C9A—C9 | −174.3 (2) |
C2—C3—C4—N5 | 70.2 (3) | C6—C5A—C9A—C9 | 0.3 (3) |
C2—C3—C4—C11 | −106.6 (3) | N5—C5A—C9A—N1 | −0.5 (4) |
C3—C4—N5—C5A | −1.8 (4) | C6—C5A—C9A—N1 | 174.1 (2) |
C11—C4—N5—C5A | 175.0 (2) | C8—C9—C9A—C5A | −3.3 (4) |
C9A—C5A—N5—C4 | −41.4 (4) | C8—C9—C9A—N1 | −177.7 (2) |
C6—C5A—N5—C4 | 143.8 (2) | C2—N1—C9A—C5A | 42.0 (3) |
C9A—C5A—C6—C7 | 2.6 (4) | C2—N1—C9A—C9 | −144.0 (2) |
N5—C5A—C6—C7 | 177.7 (2) |
Acknowledgements
CIN is indebted to UNED for a predoctoral contract (FPI `Grupos de Investigación' UNED).
Funding information
Funding for this research was provided by: Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovaciónhttps://doi.org/10.13039/501100007136 (award No. CTQ2014-56933-R); Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicashttps://doi.org/10.13039/501100003339 (award No. CTQ2015-63997-C2-2-P); Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (award No. S2009/PPQ-1533); Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distanciahttps://doi.org/10.13039/501100005367 (award No. GI_SUPRABIO_01).
References
Aastha, P., Navneet, K., Anshu, A., Pratima, S. & Dharma, K. (2013). Res. J. Chem. Sci. 3, 90–103. Google Scholar
Blake, A. J., Schröder, M. & Sorbie, R. J. (1991). Z. Kristallogr. 194, 148–151. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bonacorso, H. G., Bittencourt, S. T., Wastowski, A. D., Wentz, A. P., Zanatta, N., Martins, A. P. M. (1996). Tetrahedron Lett. 37, 9155–9156. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bruker (2004). SMART and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Chen, X., She, J., Shang, Z.-C., Wu, J. & Zhang, P. (2009). Synth. Commun. 39, 947–957. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Claramunt, R. M., Alkorta, I. & Elguero, J. (2013). Comput. Theor. Chem. 1019, 108–115. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
El-Azab, I. H. (2013). J. Heterocycl. Chem. 50, E178–E188. CAS Google Scholar
Gibson, J. F., Mackie, R. K. & Marshall, D. R. (2002). Arkivoc, iii, 1–18. Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Lloyd, D. & Marshall, D. R. (1971). The Jerusalem Symposia on Quantum Chemistry and Biochemistry. Vol. III, Aromaticity, Pseudo-Aromaticity, Anti-Aromaticity. Jerusalem: The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities. Google Scholar
Lloyd, D., McDougall, R. H. & Marshall, D. R. (2002). J. Chem. Soc. 3785–3792. Google Scholar
Mannschreck, A., Rissmann, G., Vögtle, F. & Wild, D. (1967). Chem. Ber. 100, 335–346. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Nishio, T., Tokunaga, T. & Omote, Y. (1985). J. Heterocycl. Chem. 22, 405–407. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Orioli, P. L. & Lip, H. C. (1974). Cryst. Struct. Commun. 3, 477. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Solan, A., Nişanci, B., Belcher, M., Young, J., Schäfer, C., Wheeler, K. A., Török, B. & Dembinski, R. (2014). Green Chem. 16, 1120–1124. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Speakman, J. C. & Wilson, F. B. (1976). Acta Cryst. B32, 622–624. CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Svensson, C. & Timby, L. (1981). Cryst. Struct. Commun. 10, 429. Google Scholar
Young, J., Schäfer, C., Solan, A., Baldrica, A., Belcher, M., Nişanci, B., Wheeler, K. A., Trivedi, E. R., Török, B. & Dembinski, R. (2016). RSC Adv. 6, 107081–107093. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.