Crystal structure of di­chlorido­(1,2-phenyl­enedi­amine-κ2N,N′)platinum(II)

Konno, Y.; Matsushita, N.

doi:10.1107/S2056989017008477

research communications

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 73| Part 7| July 2017| Pages 1009-1012

https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017008477

Open

access

Crystal structure of dichlorido(1,2-phenylenediamine-κ²N,N′)platinum(II)

Yosuke Konno ^a and Nobuyuki Matsushita ^b ^*

^aDepartment of Chemistry, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Komaba 3-8-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 153-8902, Japan, and ^bDepartment of Chemistry & Research Center for Smart Molecules, Rikkyo University, Nishi-Ikebukuro 3-34-1, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, 171-8501, Japan
^*Correspondence e-mail: cnmatsu@rikkyo.ac.jp

Edited by M. Weil, Vienna University of Technology, Austria (Received 31 May 2017; accepted 7 June 2017; online 13 June 2017)

The Pt^II atom in the title compound, [PtCl₂{(C₆H₄)(NH₂)₂}], lies on a twofold rotation axis and has a slightly distorted square-planar coordination environment defined by two N atoms of an 1,2-phenylenediamine ligand and two Cl⁻ ions. In the crystal, the planar complex molecules are stacked parallel to the c axis, resulting in a columnar structure. In a column, an infinite almost straight Pt⋯Pt chain is formed, suggesting weak metal–metal interactions [Pt⋯Pt = 3.3475 (8) Å]. The crystal packing is stabilized by a three-dimensional N—H⋯Cl hydrogen-bonding network between the amino groups and the Cl ligands of adjacent molecules.

Keywords: crystal structure; columnar structure; infinite metal chain; platinum(II) complex; hydrogen bonding.

CCDC reference: 1055177

1. Chemical context

The title compound, dichlorido(1,2-phenylenediamine-κ²N,N′)platinum(II) [PtCl₂{(C₆H₄)(NH₂)₂}], (I), which was originally prepared by Connors et al. (1972 ), is a member of the family of derivatives of cis-diamminedichloridoplatinum(II), cis-[PtCl₂(NH₃)₂] (cis-platin). Since the discovery of the antitumor activity of cis-platin (Rosenberg et al., 1965 ), numerous derivatives and analogues of cis-platin have been prepared and investigated. However, reports on the corresponding crystal structures are rather scarce, probably because of the difficulty in obtaining crystals suitable for X-ray analysis, in part owing to poor solubility. Although the antitumor activity (Connors et al., 1972; Meischen et al., 1976 ) and the chemical stabilities (Köckerbauer & Bednarski, 1996 ) of the title compound have been reported, its crystal structure has not been determined so far. In the course of our study of the deprotonation and redox properties of a platinum complex with 1,2-phenylenediamine as a ligand (Konno & Matsushita, 2006a ,b ), we have successfully obtained single crystals of the title compound and report here its crystal structure.

2. Structural commentary

The molecular structure of (I) is displayed in Fig. 1. The platinum compound (I) is isostructural with the palladium compound [PdCl₂{(C₆H₄)(NH₂)₂}] reported previously (Konno & Matsushita, 2017 ). The Pt^II atom lies on a twofold rotation axis. Hence the asymmetric unit comprises half of a [PtCl₂{(C₆H₄)(NH₂)₂}] molecule, the other half being completed by application of twofold rotation symmetry. The Pt^II atom is coordinated by two N atoms of an 1,2-phenylenediamine ligand and by two Cl⁻ ions in a slightly distorted square-planar configuration (Table 1). The r.m.s. deviation of the least-squares plane formed by atoms Pt1, N1, C1, C2 and C3 is 0.0121 Å. The structural parameters of the coordination sphere around Pt^II in the crystal of (I) (Table 1) are consistent with those found in cis-[PtCl₂(NH₃)₂] (Milburn & Truter, 1966 ), [PtCl₂(en)] (en is ethylenediamine; Iball et al., 1975 ), cis-[PtCl₂(L)₂] (L is cyclohexylamine; Lock et al., 1980 ), [PtCl₂(cis-dac)]·0.33-hydrate (dac is 1,2-diaminocyclohexane; Lock & Pilon, 1981 ), cis-[PtCl₂(L′)(NH₃)] (L′ is cyclobutylamine; Rochon & Melanson, 1986 ), [PtCl₂(Me₂en)] (Me₂en is N,N-dimethylethylenediamine; Melanson et al., 1987 ), [PtCl₂(tn)] (tn is 1,3-diaminopropane; Odoko & Okabe, 2006 ), [PtCl₂(L′′)] (L′′ is 2-morpholinoethylamine; Shi et al., 2006 ), [PtCl₂(Me₄en)] (Me₄en is N,N,N′,N′- tetramethylethylenediamine; Asiri et al., 2012 ). Bond lengths and angles of the 1,2-phenylenediamine moiety (Table 1) are not significantly different from those found in the bis(1,2-phenylenediamine)platinum(II) complex, [Pt(C₆H₈N₂)₂]Cl₂·2H₂O [N—C = 1.450 (2) Å, C—C = 1.365 (6)–1.389 (4) Å; Konno & Matsushita, 2006a] or in isostructural dichlorido(1,2-phenylenediamine)palladium(II) [N—C = 1.458 (2) Å, C—C = 1.371 (3)–1.416 (8) Å; Konno & Matsushita, 2017].

Table 1
Selected geometric parameters (Å, °)

Pt1—N1	2.040 (4)	C1—C2	1.372 (6)
Pt1—Cl1	2.3213 (13)	C1—C1ⁱⁱ	1.386 (9)
Pt1—Pt1ⁱ	3.3475 (8)	C2—C3	1.377 (11)
N1—C1	1.445 (6)	C3—C3ⁱⁱ	1.38 (3)

N1—Pt1—N1ⁱⁱ	83.6 (3)	Pt1ⁱ—Pt1—Pt1ⁱⁱⁱ	176.513 (11)
N1—Pt1—Cl1	91.39 (15)	C1—N1—Pt1	110.8 (3)
Cl1ⁱⁱ—Pt1—Cl1	93.69 (7)	C2—C1—C1ⁱⁱ	119.8 (3)
N1—Pt1—Pt1ⁱ	92.07 (14)	C2—C1—N1	122.7 (5)
Cl1—Pt1—Pt1ⁱ	93.80 (4)	C1ⁱⁱ—C1—N1	117.4 (2)
N1—Pt1—Pt1ⁱⁱⁱ	85.32 (14)	C1—C2—C3	120.3 (8)
Cl1—Pt1—Pt1ⁱⁱⁱ	88.59 (4)	C2—C3—C3ⁱⁱ	119.8 (6)
Symmetry codes: (i) -x+1, -y+1, -z; (ii) $[-x+1, y, -z+{\script{1\over 2}}]$ ; (iii) -x+1, -y+1, -z+1.

Figure 1
A view of the molecular structure of compound (I)

, showing the atomic numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level for non-H atoms. [Symmetry code: (i) −x + 1, y, −z + $[{1\over 2}]$ .]

3. Supramolecular features

As shown in Fig. 2, the neutral planar molecules of (I) stack parallel to the c axis, resulting in a columnar structure. The planar [PtCl₂{(C₆H₄)(NH₂)₂}] units are arranged in parallel and the 1,2-phenylenediamine moieties alternate with each other as a result of the c-glide operation. In the column, an infinite, almost straight [Pt⋯Pt⋯Pt = 176.513 (11)°] platinum chain is formed with a short interatomic distance [Pt⋯Pt = 3.3475 (8) Å], suggesting weak metal–metal interactions. The infinite palladium chain of the isostructural Pd complex is straighter [Pd⋯Pd⋯Pd = 179.232 (7)°] than the platinum chain. The Pt⋯Pt distance in (I) is slightly shorter than those of cis-[PtCl₂(NH₃)₂] [3.372 (2) and 3.409 (2) Å; Milburn & Truter, 1966] or [PtCl₂(en)] [3.381 Å; Iball et al., 1975], and is considerably shorter than that of [PtCl₂(tn)] [3.646 Å; Odoko & Okabe, 2006], all of which have similar columnar structures.

Figure 2
A view of the columnar structure of compound (I)

. Light-blue dashed lines represent hydrogen bonds between adjacent molecules in the column. Yellow dashed lines indicate the short contact between Pt atoms in the column. [Symmetry codes: (i) −x + 1, −y + 1, −z; (ii) −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1; (iii) x, y, z + 1.]

The intermolecular Pt⋯Pt distance of (I) suggests that the columnar structure is stabilized by weak metal–metal interactions. The columnar structure of (I) is further stabilized by intermolecular N—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds between adjacent molecules in the column (Fig. 2 and Table 2). Intercolumnar hydrogen bonds also help to stabilize the crystal packing of the columns (Fig. 3, and Table 2).

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯Cl1^iv	0.90	2.57	3.353 (4)	146
N1—H1B⋯Cl1^v	0.90	2.71	3.381 (4)	133
N1—H1B⋯Cl1^vi	0.90	2.73	3.320 (5)	124
Symmetry codes: (iv) $[x, -y+1, z+{\script{1\over 2}}]$ ; (v) $[x, -y+1, z-{\script{1\over 2}}]$ ; (vi) -x, -y+1, -z.

Figure 3
The crystal packing of compound (I)

, viewed along the c axis. Light-blue dashed lines represent intercolumnar hydrogen bonds. Solid orange lines indicate the unit cell.

4. Synthesis and crystallization

Compound (I) was prepared using a method modified from that described by Connors et al. (1972) as follows. To an aqueous HCl solution (1.0 M, 15 ml) of K₂[PtCl₄] (0.241 mmol, 100 mg) was slowly added an aqueous HCl solution (1.0 M, 15 ml) of 1,2-phenylenediamine (0.241 mmol, 26 mg), and then the solution was sealed in a screw-cap vial and was kept at room temperature for one week in the dark. Pale-brown needle-like crystals suitable for X-ray analysis were obtained (yield 52%). Elemental analysis found: C 19.26, H 2.23, N 7.30%; calculated for C₆H₈Cl₂N₂Pt: C 19.26, H 2.16, N 7.49%. Elemental analysis was carried out by the Laboratory of Organic Elemental Analysis, Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo.

5. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3. One reflection (010) was omitted in the final refinement because it was obstructed by the beam-stop. H atoms were placed in geometrically calculated positions and refined as riding, with C(aromatic)—H = 0.93 and N—H = 0.90 Å, and with U_iso(H) = 1.2U_eq(C,N). The maximum and minimum electron density peaks are located 0.80 and 0.74 Å, respectively, from atom Pt1.

Table 3
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	[PtCl₂(C₆H₈N₂)]
M_r	374.13
Crystal system, space group	Monoclinic, P2/c
Temperature (K)	296
a, b, c (Å)	7.087 (2), 10.446 (3), 6.6920 (16)
β (°)	116.61 (2)
V (Å³)	442.9 (2)
Z	2
Radiation type	Mo Kα
μ (mm⁻¹)	16.38
Crystal size (mm)	0.26 × 0.13 × 0.07

Data collection
Diffractometer	Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID imaging-plate
Absorption correction	Multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995 )
T_min, T_max	0.116, 0.304
No. of measured, independent and observed [F² > 2σ(F²)] reflections	10875, 1587, 1480
R_int	0.030
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.757

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.034, 0.099, 1.18
No. of reflections	1587
No. of parameters	52
H-atom treatment	H-atom parameters constrained
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	4.62, −1.74
Computer programs: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998 ), SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994 ), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2017 ), SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ).

Supporting information

CCDC reference: 1055177

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017008477/wm5396sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017008477/wm5396Isup2.hkl

checkCIF report

Computing details top

Data collection: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998); cell refinement: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998); data reduction: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 1998); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1994); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2017); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Dichlorido(1,2-phenylenediamine-κ²N,N')platinum(II) top

Crystal data top

[PtCl₂(C₆H₈N₂)]	F(000) = 340
M_r = 374.13	D_x = 2.805 Mg m⁻³
Monoclinic, P2/c	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71075 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2yc	Cell parameters from 12924 reflections
a = 7.087 (2) Å	θ = 2.0–32.6°
b = 10.446 (3) Å	µ = 16.38 mm⁻¹
c = 6.6920 (16) Å	T = 296 K
β = 116.61 (2)°	Needle, pale brown
V = 442.9 (2) Å³	0.26 × 0.13 × 0.07 mm
Z = 2

Data collection top

Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID imaging-plate diffractometer	1587 independent reflections
Radiation source: X-ray sealed tube	1480 reflections with F² > 2σ(F²)
Graphite monochromator	R_int = 0.030
Detector resolution: 10.00 pixels mm^-1	θ_max = 32.6°, θ_min = 3.2°
ω scans	h = −10→10
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)	k = −15→15
T_min = 0.116, T_max = 0.304	l = −10→8
10875 measured reflections

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.034	H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F²) = 0.099	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0669P)² + 0.3105P] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
S = 1.18	(Δ/σ)_max = 0.001
1587 reflections	Δρ_max = 4.62 e Å⁻³
52 parameters	Δρ_min = −1.74 e Å⁻³
0 restraints	Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc^*=kFc[1+0.001xFc²λ³/sin(2θ)]^-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods	Extinction coefficient: 0.0039 (12)

Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Least-squares planes (x,y,z in crystal coordinates) and deviations from them (* indicates atom used to define plane)

- 2.7022 (0.0123) x - 0.0000 (0.0000) y + 6.6740 (0.0026) z = 0.3174 (0.0059)

* 0.0000 (0.0000) Pt1 * -0.0185 (0.0028) Cl1 * 0.0206 (0.0042) N1 * 0.0050 (0.0039) C1 * -0.0017 (0.0044) C2 * 0.0031 (0.0116) C3 * 0.0185 (0.0028) Cl1_$6 * -0.0206 (0.0042) N1_$6 * -0.0050 (0.0039) C1_$6 * 0.0017 (0.0044) C2_$6 * -0.0031 (0.0116) C3_$6

Rms deviation of fitted atoms = 0.0121

Refinement. Refinement of F² against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F², conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F². The threshold expression of F² > 2sigma(F²) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F² are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
Pt1	0.5000	0.504875 (16)	0.2500	0.03029 (13)
Cl1	0.23327 (19)	0.65687 (13)	0.1392 (2)	0.0429 (3)
N1	0.2863 (7)	0.3592 (4)	0.1666 (8)	0.0407 (9)
H1A	0.2144	0.3653	0.2480	0.049*
H1B	0.1934	0.3657	0.0213	0.049*
C1	0.3910 (7)	0.2364 (4)	0.2066 (6)	0.0400 (8)
C2	0.2835 (10)	0.1225 (5)	0.1621 (9)	0.0563 (12)
H2	0.1370	0.1224	0.1016	0.068*
C3	0.391 (3)	0.0081 (5)	0.207 (2)	0.068 (3)
H3	0.3182	−0.0690	0.1780	0.082*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
Pt1	0.02635 (17)	0.02835 (16)	0.03208 (18)	0.000	0.00944 (11)	0.000
Cl1	0.0335 (5)	0.0383 (5)	0.0513 (6)	0.0058 (4)	0.0140 (4)	0.0012 (4)
N1	0.0347 (18)	0.0371 (18)	0.043 (2)	−0.0017 (14)	0.0108 (16)	−0.0011 (15)
C1	0.050 (2)	0.0328 (18)	0.0365 (18)	−0.0028 (15)	0.0185 (17)	−0.0012 (14)
C2	0.067 (3)	0.046 (3)	0.054 (3)	−0.018 (2)	0.026 (2)	−0.005 (2)
C3	0.112 (10)	0.037 (3)	0.063 (6)	−0.017 (3)	0.047 (6)	−0.006 (2)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

Pt1—N1	2.040 (4)	N1—H1B	0.9000
Pt1—N1ⁱ	2.040 (4)	C1—C2	1.372 (6)
Pt1—Cl1ⁱ	2.3213 (13)	C1—C1ⁱ	1.386 (9)
Pt1—Cl1	2.3213 (13)	C2—C3	1.377 (11)
Pt1—Pt1ⁱⁱ	3.3475 (8)	C2—H2	0.9300
Pt1—Pt1ⁱⁱⁱ	3.3475 (8)	C3—C3ⁱ	1.38 (3)
N1—C1	1.445 (6)	C3—H3	0.9300
N1—H1A	0.9000

N1—Pt1—N1ⁱ	83.6 (3)	C1—N1—Pt1	110.8 (3)
N1—Pt1—Cl1ⁱ	174.82 (12)	C1—N1—H1A	109.5
N1ⁱ—Pt1—Cl1ⁱ	91.39 (15)	Pt1—N1—H1A	109.5
N1—Pt1—Cl1	91.39 (15)	C1—N1—H1B	109.5
N1ⁱ—Pt1—Cl1	174.82 (12)	Pt1—N1—H1B	109.5
Cl1ⁱ—Pt1—Cl1	93.69 (7)	H1A—N1—H1B	108.1
N1—Pt1—Pt1ⁱⁱ	92.07 (14)	C2—C1—C1ⁱ	119.8 (3)
N1ⁱ—Pt1—Pt1ⁱⁱ	85.32 (14)	C2—C1—N1	122.7 (5)
Cl1ⁱ—Pt1—Pt1ⁱⁱ	88.59 (4)	C1ⁱ—C1—N1	117.4 (2)
Cl1—Pt1—Pt1ⁱⁱ	93.80 (4)	C1—C2—C3	120.3 (8)
N1—Pt1—Pt1ⁱⁱⁱ	85.32 (14)	C1—C2—H2	119.8
N1ⁱ—Pt1—Pt1ⁱⁱⁱ	92.07 (14)	C3—C2—H2	119.8
Cl1ⁱ—Pt1—Pt1ⁱⁱⁱ	93.80 (4)	C2—C3—C3ⁱ	119.8 (6)
Cl1—Pt1—Pt1ⁱⁱⁱ	88.59 (4)	C2—C3—H3	120.1
Pt1ⁱⁱ—Pt1—Pt1ⁱⁱⁱ	176.513 (11)	C3ⁱ—C3—H3	120.1

Pt1ⁱⁱ—Pt1—N1—C1	84.8 (3)	Pt1ⁱⁱⁱ—Pt1—N1—C1	−92.9 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y, −z+1/2; (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z; (iii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
N1—H1A···Cl1^iv	0.90	2.57	3.353 (4)	146
N1—H1B···Cl1^v	0.90	2.71	3.381 (4)	133
N1—H1B···Cl1^vi	0.90	2.73	3.320 (5)	124

Symmetry codes: (iv) x, −y+1, z+1/2; (v) x, −y+1, z−1/2; (vi) −x, −y+1, −z.

Funding information

Funding for this research was provided by: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, MEXT-Supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities (award No. S1311027).

References

Altomare, A., Cascarano, G., Giacovazzo, C., Guagliardi, A., Burla, M. C., Polidori, G. & Camalli, M. (1994). J. Appl. Cryst. 27, 435. CrossRef Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Asiri, A. M., Arshad, M. N., Ishaq, M., Alamry, K. A. & Bokhari, T. H. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, m1562. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Brandenburg, K. (2017). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Connors, T. A., Jones, M., Ross, W. C. J., Braddock, P. D., Khokhar, A. R. & Tobe, M. L. (1972). Chem. Biol. Interact. 5, 415–424. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Higashi, T. (1995). ABSCOR. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. Google Scholar
Iball, J., MacDougall, M. & Scrimgeour, S. (1975). Acta Cryst. B31, 1672–1674. CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Köckerbauer, R. & Bednarski, P. J. (1996). J. Inorg. Biochem. 62, 281–298. PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Konno, Y. & Matsushita, N. (2006a). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 79, 1046–1053. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Konno, Y. & Matsushita, N. (2006b). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 79, 1237–1239. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Konno, Y. & Matsushita, N. (2017). IUCrData, 2, x170144. Google Scholar
Lock, C. J. L. & Pilon, P. (1981). Acta Cryst. B37, 45–49. CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Lock, C. J. L., Speranzinl, R. A. & Zvagulis, M. (1980). Acta Cryst. B36, 1789–1793. CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Meischen, S. J., Gale, G. R., Lake, L. M., Frangakis, C. J., Rosenblum, M. G., Walker, E. M., Atkins, L. M. & Smith, A. B. (1976). J. Natl Cancer Inst. 57, 841–845. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Melanson, R., de la Chevrotière, C. & Rochon, F. D. (1987). Acta Cryst. C43, 57–59. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Milburn, G. H. W. & Truter, M. R. (1966). J. Chem. Soc. A, pp. 1609–1616. CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
Odoko, M. & Okabe, N. (2006). Acta Cryst. C62, m136–m139. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Rigaku (1998). RAPID-AUTO. Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan. Google Scholar
Rochon, F. D. & Melanson, R. (1986). Acta Cryst. C42, 1291–1294. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Rosenberg, B., Van Camp, L. & Krigas, T. (1965). Nature, 205, 698–699. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Shi, X.-F., Xie, M.-J. & Ng, S. W. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, m2719–m2720. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar