Crystal structure of the co-crystalline adduct 1,3,6,8-tetra­aza­tri­cyclo­[4.4.1.13,8]dodecane (TATD)–4-iodo­phenol (1/2): supra­molecular assembly mediated by halogen and hydrogen bonding

Rivera, A.; Rojas, J.J.; Ríos-Motta, J.; Bolte, M.

doi:10.1107/S2056989017014943

research communications

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 73| Part 11| November 2017| Pages 1692-1695

https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017014943

Open

access

Crystal structure of the co-crystalline adduct 1,3,6,8-tetraazatricyclo[4.4.1.1^3,8]dodecane (TATD)–4-iodophenol (1/2): supramolecular assembly mediated by halogen and hydrogen bonding

Augusto Rivera,^a ^* Jicli José Rojas,^a Jaime Ríos-Motta ^a and Michael Bolte ^b

^aUniversidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogotá, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Química, Cra 30 No. 45-03, Bogotá, Código, Postal 111321, Colombia, and ^bInstitut für Anorganische Chemie, J. W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Max-von Laue-Strasse 7, 60438 Frankfurt/Main, Germany
^*Correspondence e-mail: ariverau@unal.edu.co

Edited by J. Simpson, University of Otago, New Zealand (Received 8 October 2017; accepted 14 October 2017; online 20 October 2017)

The asymmetric unit of the title co-crystalline adduct, 1,3,6,8-tetraazatricyclo[4.4.1.1^3,8]dodecane (TATD)–4-iodophenol (1/2), C₈H₁₆N₄·2C₆H₅IO, comprises a half molecule of the aminal cage polyamine plus a 4-iodophenol molecule. A twofold rotation axis generates the other half of the adduct. The components are linked by two intermolecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds. The adducts are further linked into a three-dimensional framework structure by a combination of N⋯I halogen bonds and weak non-conventional C—H⋯O and C—H⋯I hydrogen bonds.

Keywords: crystal structure; co-crystalline adduct; hydrogen bonding; halogen bonding; TATD.

CCDC reference: 1580038

1. Chemical context

Halogenoorganic compounds are able to play a role in organic supramolecular assemblies as electrophilic species, and have been used as models in the construction of self-assembled architectures. Non-covalent bonds such as hydrogen bonds (HB) and halogen bonds (XB) attract interest in crystal engineering because they have clear directional properties (Umezono & Okuno, 2017 ). Hydrogen bonds have been used successfully to construct supramolecular architectures as a result of their high directionality, which also results in high selectivity. Halogen bonds exhibit similar directionality and strength to hydrogen bonds and can offer a new approach to the control of supramolecular assemblies (Jin et al., 2014 ). XB also play important roles in natural systems, and have been effectively applied in various fields including crystal engineering, solid-state molecular recognition, materials with optical properties and supramolecular liquid crystals (Li et al., 2017 ). The strength of the interactions involving halogens increases on going from chlorine to bromine to iodine. Although hydrogen bonds are likely to be more effective, XB also are also important in crystal packing (Aakeröy et al., 2015 ; Geboes et al., 2017 ). In view of the analogies between halogen and hydrogen bonding, we think that the 4-iodophenol molecule offers interesting possibilities for exploring the effect of halogen-bonding interactions on supramolecular assemblies of phenols with polyamines. Following our previous work on acid–base adducts based on macrocyclic aminals and phenols, we report herein the synthesis and crystal structure of the title compound, a supramolecular complex assembled through non-covalent HB and XB interactions between 4-iodophenol and 1,3,6,8-tetraazatricyclo[4.4.1.13,8]dodecane (TATD).

2. Structural commentary

The title compound is isostructural with 1,3,6,8-tetraazatricyclo[4.4.1.1^3,8]dodecane (TATD)–4-bromophenol (Rivera, Uribe et al., 2015 ): both crystallize in the space group Fdd2, and the differences between the unit-cell parameters (a, b, c) are < 7%. The asymmetric unit comprises one half of a 1,3,6,8-tetraazatricyclo[4.4.1.1^3,8]dodecane (TATD) molecule and one iodophenol molecule held together by intermolecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds [O⋯N 2.741 (6) Å; O—H⋯N 154 (7)°; Table 1]. The complete adduct is generated by a crystallographic twofold rotation axis, (Fig. 1).

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯N1	0.84 (1)	1.96 (4)	2.741 (6)	154 (7)
C5—H5B⋯I1ⁱ	0.99	3.03	3.961 (7)	158
C13—H13⋯O1ⁱⁱ	0.95	2.53	3.455 (6)	165
Symmetry codes: (i) -x+1, -y+1, z-1; (ii) $[-x+1, -y+{\script{3\over 2}}, z+{\script{1\over 2}}]$ .

Figure 1
A view of the molecular structure of the title compound, showing the atom-labelling scheme, with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability. H atoms bonded to C atoms are omitted for clarity. Hydrogen bonds are drawn as dashed lines. Atoms labelled with the suffix A are generated using the symmetry operator (−x + 1, −y + 1, z).

Apart from the C—I/Br bond-length differences and some of the bond angles in the benzene ring, the molecules have similar geometric data (bond lengths and angles). The C14—I1 bond length [2.106 (5) Å] is in good agreement with the value reported for 4-iodophenol itself [2.104 (5) Å; Merz, 2006 ]. The overall molecular conformation of TATD observed here is very close to that of TATD in the related bromophenol adduct (Rivera, Uribe et al., 2015).

3. Supramolecular features

In the crystal, the three independent molecules are linked via two intermolecular O1—H1⋯N1 hydrogen bonds (Table 1 and Fig. 1). These supramolecular units are then linked by direction-specific intermolecular interactions, including both non-conventional hydrogen bonds and halogen bonds, C—H⋯O and C—H⋯I hydrogen bonds, forming slabs lying parallel to the bc plane (Table 1 and Fig. 2). However, considering the donor–acceptor bond lengths of 3.961 (7) Å [C5—H5B⋯I1] and 3.455 (6) Å [C13—H13⋯O1], which exceed the sum of the corresponding van der Waals radii (0.281 and 0.255 Å, respectively), the strength of the these non-conventional hydrogen bonds can be classified as very weak (Steiner, 2003 ).

Figure 2
A view of the crystal packing of the title compound, showing the O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds; and C—H⋯O and C—H⋯hydrogen bonds (dashed lines).

In addition, as indicated by a PLATON analysis (Spek, 2009 ), the iodine atom is involved, as an electron-density acceptor, in two short contacts with N2 and C3, seemingly forming a bifurcated halogen bond, where the I⋯N [3.351 (5) Å] and I⋯C distances [3.519 (5) Å] are 0.18 and 0.16 Å, respectively, less than the sum of the corresponding van der Waals radii (Alvarez, 2013 ). The I⋯N distance corresponds to 90% of the sum of the van der Waals radii (3.70 Å) and the C14—I1⋯N2ⁱⁱⁱ angle of 173.11 (2)° is close to being linear [symmetry code: (iii) x + $[{1\over 4}]$ , −y + $[{5\over 4}]$ , z + $[{5\over 4}]$ ]. Taking into account these geometrical parameters, the I1⋯N2 contacts can formally be considered as halogen bonds. It appears that this contact imposes the relatively close, but significantly longer I⋯C contact. Unsurprisingly, this pattern is repeated with the isostructural bromo analogue (Rivera, Uribe et al., 2015) with Br⋯N = 3.292 (4) and C⋯Br = 3.477 (4) Å. There is also a Cl⋯N halogen bond in the related 4-chloro-3,5-dimethylphenol analogue (Rivera, Rojas, et al., 2015 ) with Cl⋯N = 3.1680 (16); the C⋯Cl contact has extended to 3.5828 (19) Å and can be disregarded.

4. Database survey

The structure of 1,3,6,8-tetraazatricyclo[4.4.1.13,8]dodecane has already been determined (Murray-Rust, 1974 ; Rivera et al., 2014 ). Since the molecule is rigid, it is not surprising that it compares very closely with the TATD molecule in the title compound. The structure of 1,3,6,8-tetraazatricyclo[4.4.1.13,8]dodecane hydroquinone (Rivera et al., 2007 ) shows two O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds of similar geometry to that of the title compound. Interestingly, this pattern is repeated with 4-bromophenol 1,3,6,8-tetraazatricyclo[4.4.1.13,8]dodecane (Rivera, Uribe et al., 2015), which is isostructural with the title compound. In contrast, 4-chloro-3,5-dimethylphenol 1,3,6,8-tetraazatricyclo[4.4.1.13,8]dodecane (Rivera, Rojas et al., 2015) only forms one O—H⋯N hydrogen bond, nonetheless with similar geometric parameters to those in the title compound. Similarly, in the supramolecular complex with a 2:1 ratio of 4-iodophenol to the aza-donor 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (Nayak & Pedireddi, 2017 ), the molecules are again connected through O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds but with no halogen-bond interaction involving the iodo substituent.

5. Synthesis and crystallization

A mixture of 1,3,6,8-tetraazatricyclo[4.4.1.1^3,8]dodecane (TATD) (0.168g, 1 mmol) and 4-iodophenol (0.440g, 2 mmol) was ground at room temperature with a pestle in a mortar for 15 min., as required to complete the reaction (TLC). The mixture was recrystallized from a mixture of n-hexane with a few drops of ethanol to obtain crystals suitable for X-ray analysis, m.p. = 391 K. (yield: 56%).

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. All H atoms were located in a difference electron-density map. The hydroxyl H atom was refined freely, while C-bound H atoms were fixed geometrically (C—H = 0.95 or 0.99 Å) and refined using a riding-model approximation, with U_iso(H) set to 1.2U_eq of the parent atom

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	C₈H₁₆N₄·2C₆H₅IO
M_r	608.25
Crystal system, space group	Orthorhombic, Fdd2
Temperature (K)	173
a, b, c (Å)	20.8869 (16), 22.4197 (13), 9.6352 (6)
V (Å³)	4512.0 (5)
Z	8
Radiation type	Mo Kα
μ (mm⁻¹)	2.81
Crystal size (mm)	0.24 × 0.23 × 0.23

Data collection
Diffractometer	Stoe IPDS II two-circle
Absorption correction	Multi-scan (X-AREA; Stoe & Cie, 2001 )
T_min, T_max	0.548, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	7213, 2102, 2079
R_int	0.029
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.606

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.025, 0.065, 1.06
No. of reflections	2102
No. of parameters	132
No. of restraints	2
H-atom treatment	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.25, −0.67
Absolute structure	Classical Flack (1983 ) method preferred over Parsons because s.u. lower
Absolute structure parameter	−0.03 (4)
Computer programs: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2001), XP in SHELXTL-Plus and SHELXS2016 (Sheldrick, 2008 ) and SHELXL2016 (Sheldrick, 2015 ).

Supporting information

CCDC reference: 1580038

Crystal structure: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017014943/sj5537sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017014943/sj5537Isup2.hkl

Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017014943/sj5537Isup3.cml

checkCIF report

Computing details top

Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2001); cell refinement: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2001); data reduction: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2001); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS2016 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2016 (Sheldrick, 2015); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL-Plus (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL2016 (Sheldrick, 2015).

1,3,6,8-Tetraazatricyclo[4.4.1.1^3,8]dodecane–4-iodophenol (1/2) top

Crystal data top

C₈H₁₆N₄·2C₆H₅IO	D_x = 1.791 Mg m⁻³
M_r = 608.25	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, Fdd2	Cell parameters from 15571 reflections
a = 20.8869 (16) Å	θ = 3.6–25.9°
b = 22.4197 (13) Å	µ = 2.81 mm⁻¹
c = 9.6352 (6) Å	T = 173 K
V = 4512.0 (5) Å³	Block, yellow
Z = 8	0.24 × 0.23 × 0.23 mm
F(000) = 2368

Data collection top

Stoe IPDS II two-circle diffractometer	2079 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: Genix 3D IµS microfocus X-ray source	R_int = 0.029
ω scans	θ_max = 25.5°, θ_min = 3.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (X-AREA; Stoe & Cie, 2001)	h = −24→25
T_min = 0.548, T_max = 1.000	k = −26→27
7213 measured reflections	l = −11→11
2102 independent reflections

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Hydrogen site location: mixed
Least-squares matrix: full	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.025	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0495P)² + 5.1297P] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
wR(F²) = 0.065	(Δ/σ)_max = 0.002
S = 1.06	Δρ_max = 0.25 e Å⁻³
2102 reflections	Δρ_min = −0.67 e Å⁻³
132 parameters	Absolute structure: Classical Flack (1983) method preferred over Parsons because s.u. lower
2 restraints	Absolute structure parameter: −0.03 (4)

Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq	Occ. (<1)
N1	0.5189 (2)	0.55327 (17)	0.2785 (4)	0.0293 (9)
N2	0.4501 (2)	0.5309 (2)	0.0695 (5)	0.0335 (9)
C1	0.500000	0.500000	0.3551 (8)	0.0350 (16)
H1A	0.463825	0.511142	0.416230	0.042*	0.5
H1B	0.536176	0.488858	0.416229	0.042*	0.5
C2	0.4734 (3)	0.5730 (3)	0.1705 (6)	0.0413 (13)
H2A	0.435585	0.589927	0.218543	0.050*
H2B	0.493847	0.606119	0.119081	0.050*
C3	0.500000	0.500000	−0.0073 (9)	0.0383 (16)
H3A	0.521109	0.529565	−0.068331	0.046*	0.5
H3B	0.478891	0.470437	−0.068336	0.046*	0.5
C4	0.3977 (3)	0.4922 (3)	0.1176 (7)	0.0439 (13)
H4A	0.381691	0.469170	0.037109	0.053*
H4B	0.362214	0.517973	0.149924	0.053*
C5	0.4138 (3)	0.4485 (3)	0.2331 (7)	0.0456 (14)
H5A	0.386853	0.458252	0.314539	0.055*
H5B	0.401546	0.407971	0.201822	0.055*
I1	0.63999 (2)	0.68958 (2)	1.00445 (6)	0.03902 (14)
O1	0.5030 (2)	0.65445 (17)	0.4344 (4)	0.0364 (8)
H1	0.518 (3)	0.623 (2)	0.402 (7)	0.05 (2)*
C11	0.5320 (2)	0.6593 (2)	0.5604 (6)	0.0293 (10)
C12	0.5220 (3)	0.7116 (2)	0.6361 (6)	0.0352 (11)
H12	0.494289	0.741464	0.600328	0.042*
C13	0.5518 (2)	0.72031 (19)	0.7624 (7)	0.0330 (10)
H13	0.544963	0.756109	0.813067	0.040*
C14	0.5920 (2)	0.6759 (2)	0.8149 (6)	0.0293 (10)
C15	0.6015 (2)	0.6234 (2)	0.7428 (7)	0.0312 (9)
H15	0.628314	0.593158	0.780345	0.037*
C16	0.5715 (2)	0.6147 (2)	0.6143 (6)	0.0309 (10)
H16	0.578032	0.578773	0.564169	0.037*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
N1	0.038 (2)	0.028 (2)	0.022 (2)	−0.0009 (16)	−0.0024 (17)	0.0024 (16)
N2	0.031 (2)	0.045 (2)	0.025 (2)	0.0090 (19)	0.0002 (17)	0.0008 (18)
C1	0.047 (4)	0.035 (4)	0.023 (3)	−0.008 (3)	0.000	0.000
C2	0.050 (3)	0.038 (3)	0.036 (3)	0.015 (3)	−0.006 (2)	0.004 (2)
C3	0.032 (3)	0.061 (4)	0.022 (3)	0.011 (3)	0.000	0.000
C4	0.026 (2)	0.067 (4)	0.038 (3)	0.007 (2)	−0.003 (2)	0.002 (3)
C5	0.039 (3)	0.050 (3)	0.048 (4)	−0.007 (2)	−0.001 (3)	0.002 (3)
I1	0.0425 (2)	0.03403 (19)	0.0405 (2)	−0.00169 (13)	−0.00853 (15)	−0.00435 (16)
O1	0.044 (2)	0.0297 (18)	0.0355 (19)	0.0035 (16)	−0.0077 (17)	−0.0043 (16)
C11	0.024 (2)	0.030 (2)	0.034 (2)	−0.0028 (18)	0.0035 (19)	0.0018 (19)
C12	0.035 (3)	0.029 (2)	0.041 (3)	0.005 (2)	0.001 (2)	0.000 (2)
C13	0.037 (2)	0.0255 (19)	0.036 (3)	0.0028 (18)	0.007 (2)	−0.005 (3)
C14	0.027 (2)	0.032 (2)	0.030 (2)	−0.0029 (19)	0.003 (2)	0.000 (2)
C15	0.030 (2)	0.027 (2)	0.036 (3)	0.0023 (16)	0.001 (2)	0.001 (2)
C16	0.033 (2)	0.024 (2)	0.036 (2)	−0.0012 (18)	0.002 (2)	−0.002 (2)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

N1—C1	1.458 (5)	C5—H5A	0.9900
N1—C5ⁱ	1.474 (7)	C5—H5B	0.9900
N1—C2	1.478 (7)	I1—C14	2.106 (5)
N2—C2	1.440 (8)	O1—C11	1.361 (6)
N2—C3	1.453 (6)	O1—H1	0.838 (14)
N2—C4	1.472 (8)	C11—C16	1.395 (7)
C1—H1A	0.9900	C11—C12	1.397 (8)
C1—H1B	0.9900	C12—C13	1.381 (9)
C2—H2A	0.9900	C12—H12	0.9500
C2—H2B	0.9900	C13—C14	1.398 (8)
C3—H3A	0.9900	C13—H13	0.9500
C3—H3B	0.9900	C14—C15	1.382 (7)
C4—C5	1.520 (9)	C15—C16	1.401 (8)
C4—H4A	0.9900	C15—H15	0.9500
C4—H4B	0.9900	C16—H16	0.9500

C1—N1—C5ⁱ	112.8 (4)	C5—C4—H4B	108.2
C1—N1—C2	115.3 (4)	H4A—C4—H4B	107.3
C5ⁱ—N1—C2	114.4 (5)	N1ⁱ—C5—C4	116.4 (5)
C2—N2—C3	114.5 (4)	N1ⁱ—C5—H5A	108.2
C2—N2—C4	115.1 (5)	C4—C5—H5A	108.2
C3—N2—C4	114.4 (4)	N1ⁱ—C5—H5B	108.2
N1—C1—N1ⁱ	119.2 (6)	C4—C5—H5B	108.2
N1—C1—H1A	107.5	H5A—C5—H5B	107.3
N1ⁱ—C1—H1A	107.5	C11—O1—H1	103 (5)
N1—C1—H1B	107.5	O1—C11—C16	122.6 (5)
N1ⁱ—C1—H1B	107.5	O1—C11—C12	117.7 (5)
H1A—C1—H1B	107.0	C16—C11—C12	119.6 (5)
N2—C2—N1	119.8 (4)	C13—C12—C11	120.8 (5)
N2—C2—H2A	107.4	C13—C12—H12	119.6
N1—C2—H2A	107.4	C11—C12—H12	119.6
N2—C2—H2B	107.4	C12—C13—C14	119.3 (5)
N1—C2—H2B	107.4	C12—C13—H13	120.4
H2A—C2—H2B	106.9	C14—C13—H13	120.4
N2—C3—N2ⁱ	118.8 (7)	C15—C14—C13	120.8 (5)
N2—C3—H3A	107.6	C15—C14—I1	119.5 (4)
N2ⁱ—C3—H3A	107.6	C13—C14—I1	119.8 (4)
N2—C3—H3B	107.6	C14—C15—C16	119.8 (5)
N2ⁱ—C3—H3B	107.6	C14—C15—H15	120.1
H3A—C3—H3B	107.0	C16—C15—H15	120.1
N2—C4—C5	116.5 (5)	C11—C16—C15	119.7 (5)
N2—C4—H4A	108.2	C11—C16—H16	120.2
C5—C4—H4A	108.2	C15—C16—H16	120.2
N2—C4—H4B	108.2

C5ⁱ—N1—C1—N1ⁱ	−82.7 (4)	O1—C11—C12—C13	−177.7 (5)
C2—N1—C1—N1ⁱ	51.3 (3)	C16—C11—C12—C13	1.5 (8)
C3—N2—C2—N1	−55.1 (7)	C11—C12—C13—C14	−0.5 (8)
C4—N2—C2—N1	80.5 (7)	C12—C13—C14—C15	−0.9 (8)
C1—N1—C2—N2	−50.6 (7)	C12—C13—C14—I1	178.2 (4)
C5ⁱ—N1—C2—N2	82.6 (7)	C13—C14—C15—C16	1.3 (8)
C2—N2—C3—N2ⁱ	53.6 (4)	I1—C14—C15—C16	−177.8 (4)
C4—N2—C3—N2ⁱ	−82.3 (4)	O1—C11—C16—C15	178.1 (5)
C2—N2—C4—C5	−65.6 (7)	C12—C11—C16—C15	−1.1 (8)
C3—N2—C4—C5	70.1 (7)	C14—C15—C16—C11	−0.3 (8)
N2—C4—C5—N1ⁱ	−3.8 (8)

Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
O1—H1···N1	0.84 (1)	1.96 (4)	2.741 (6)	154 (7)
C5—H5B···I1ⁱⁱ	0.99	3.03	3.961 (7)	158
C13—H13···O1ⁱⁱⁱ	0.95	2.53	3.455 (6)	165

Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+1, −y+1, z−1; (iii) −x+1, −y+3/2, z+1/2.

Funding information

We acknowledge the Dirección de Investigaciones, Sede Bogotá (DIB) de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia for financial support of this work (research project No. 35816). JJR. is also grateful to COLCIENCIAS for his doctoral scholarship.

References

Aakeröy, C. B., Spartz, C. L., Dembowski, S., Dwyre, S. & Desper, J. (2015). IUCrJ, 2, 498–510. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed IUCr Journals
Alvarez, S. (2013). Dalton Trans. 42, 8617–8636. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed
Flack, H. D. (1983). Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals
Geboes, Y., De Proft, F. & Herrebout, W. A. (2017). Acta Cryst. B73, 168–178. CrossRef IUCr Journals
Jin, S., Liu, H., Gao, X. J., Lin, Z., Chen, G. & Wang, D. (2014). J. Mol. Struct. 1075, 124–138. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS
Li, J., Hu, Y.-H., Ge, C.-W., Gong, H.-G. & Gao, H.-K. (2017). Chinese Chem. Lett. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2017.06.008
Merz, K. (2006). Cryst. Growth Des. 6, 1615–1619. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS
Murray-Rust, P. (1974). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 1136.
Nayak, A. & Pedireddi, V. R. (2017). J. Mol. Struct. 1130, 251–263. CSD CrossRef CAS
Rivera, A., Ríos-Motta, J. & Bolte, M. (2014). Acta Cryst. E70, o266. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals
Rivera, A., Ríos-Motta, J., Hernández-Barragán, A. & Joseph-Nathan, P. (2007). J. Mol. Struct. 831, 180–186. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS
Rivera, A., Rojas, J. J., Ríos-Motta, J. & Bolte, M. (2015). Acta Cryst. E71, 737–740. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals
Rivera, A., Uribe, J. M., Rojas, J. J., Ríos-Motta, J. & Bolte, M. (2015). Acta Cryst. E71, 463–465. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals
Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
Steiner, T. (2003). Crystallogr. Rev. 9, 177–228. CrossRef CAS
Stoe & Cie (2001). X-AREA and X-RED32. Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany.
Umezono, S. & Okuno, T. (2017). J. Mol. Struct. 1147, 636–642. CSD CrossRef CAS

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.