Synthesis and crystal structure of a new pyridinium bromide salt: 4-methyl-1-(3-phen­oxy­prop­yl)pyridinium bromide

Said, M.A.; Aouad, M.R.; Hughes, D.L.; Almehmadi, M.A.; Messali, M.

doi:10.1107/S2056989017015481

research communications

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 73| Part 12| December 2017| Pages 1831-1834

https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017015481

Open

access

Synthesis and crystal structure of a new pyridinium bromide salt: 4-methyl-1-(3-phenoxypropyl)pyridinium bromide

Musa A. Said,^a Mohamed R. Aouad,^a,^b David L. Hughes,^c ^* Meshal A. Almehmadi ^a and Mouslim Messali ^a ^*

^aDepartment of Chemistry, Taibah University, 30002, Al-Madina Al-Mounawara, Saudi Arabia, ^bLaboratoire de Chimie & Electrochimie des Complexes Métalliques (LCECM), USTO-MB, University of Sciences and Technology Mohamed Boudiaf, BP 1505 Oran, El M'nouar, Algeria, and ^cSchool of Chemistry, University of East Anglia, University Plain, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom
^*Correspondence e-mail: d.l.hughes@uea.ac.uk, mouslim@mail.be

Edited by H. Stoeckli-Evans, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland (Received 22 September 2017; accepted 24 October 2017; online 3 November 2017)

In the cation of the title molecular salt, C₁₅H₁₈NO⁺·Br⁻, the pyridinium and phenyl rings are inclined to one another by 11.80 (8)°. In the crystal, the Br⁻ anion is linked to the cation by a C—H⋯Br hydrogen bond. The cations stack along the b-axis direction and are linked by further C—H⋯Br interactions, and offset π–π interactions [intercentroid distances = 3.5733 (19) and 3.8457 (19) Å], forming slabs parallel to the ab plane. The effects of the C—H⋯X⁻ interaction on the NMR signals of the ortho- and meta-pyridinium protons in a series of related ionic liquids, viz. 4-methyl-1-(4-phenoxybutyl)pyridin-1-ium salts, are reported and discussed.

Keywords: crystal structure; ionic liquids; pyridinium salts; halide; hydrogen bonding; π–π interactions.

CCDC reference: 1581713

1. Chemical context

In the last two decades, ionic liquids (ILs) have gained considerable interest as excellent alternatives to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) because of their unusual range of properties such as negligible vapour pressure, excellent thermal stability in a wide temperature range, no flammability, high ionic conductivity and solvation ability (Davis, 2004 ).

A wide range of applications using ionic liquids has been reported in many areas such as solvents in organic synthesis (Wang et al., 2007 ), media for electrodeposition of metals (Endres, 2002 ), corrosion inhibitors (Ibrahim et al., 2011 ), electrolytes for electrochemical devices such as batteries (Brennecke & Maginn, 2001 ), catalysts (Shi et al. 2004 ), in fuel cells (De Souza et al., 2006 ), in polymer science (Kubisa, 2004 ), and in dye-sensitized solar cells (Kawano et al., 2004 ).

In view of the above mentioned, and of our ongoing research interest in the synthesis of ionic liquids (Messali, 2016 , 2015 ; Messali et al., 2014 ), we present in this study the preparation and the crystal structure of the novel title pyridinium halide salt, 4-methyl-1-(3-phenoxypropyl)pyridinium bromide.

2. Structural commentary

The molecular structure of the title pyridinium bromide salt is illustrated in Fig. 1. There is a weak intramolecular C—H⋯O contact present, with an H⋯O distance of 2.52 Å and a C—H⋯O angle of only 100° (see Table 1). The cation consists of two planar groups, a pyridinium ring (N11/C12–C16) and a phenyl group (C1–C6); atom N11 has the expected planar–trigonal conformation. The two aromatic rings are inclined to one another by 11.80 (8)° and there is a step of ca 1.35 Å between the two groups along the C9—C10 bond, see Fig. 2. The C1—O7, C8—C9, C10—N11 and C14—C17 bonds are roughly parallel, so that the two aromatic groups are at opposite ends of an approximately linear cation. This is in contrast to the alignment found in 1-[2-(5-nitro-1H-indol-2-yl)phenyl]methylpyridinium chloride where the cation is U-shaped with the pyridinium ring lying over the pyrrolo ring of the indole moiety (Bremner et al., 2011 ), possibly as a result of electronic interactions between the two rings.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
C10—H10A⋯O7	0.97	2.52	2.850 (3)	100
C10—H10B⋯Br1ⁱ	0.97	2.89	3.735 (3)	146
C10—H10A⋯Br1	0.97	3.11	4.043 (3)	163
C12—H12⋯Br1	0.93	3.08	3.940 (3)	154
C15—H15⋯Br1ⁱⁱ	0.93	3.07	3.931 (3)	155
C17—H17B⋯Br1ⁱⁱ	0.96	3.08	3.956 (4)	152
Symmetry codes: (i) $[x+{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{3\over 2}}, -z+1]$ ; (ii) x+1, y, z.

Figure 1
The molecular structure of the component ions of the title salt, indicating the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

Figure 2
A view of the cation showing the step formation about bond C9—C10 and the approximately parallel ring planes.

3. Supramolecular features

In the crystal, the bromide anion is linked to the cation by a C10—H10B⋯Br1ⁱ hydrogen bond (Table 1). The anion is surrounded by three other cations with the most significant C-–H⋯Br short contacts varying from ca 3.07 to 3.11 Å (Table 1). The bromide ions are aligned approximately in the planes of the aromatic rings, which is similar to the arrangement found in N-benzylpyridinium bromide (Anders et al., 1990 ), and in contrast to those in a series of N-(pentafluorobenzyl)pyridinium salts where the anion faces the aromatic rings with formation of anion–π interactions (Giese et al., 2014 ).

The cations stack head-to-tail, in pairs about centres of symmetry, along the b-axis direction with the aromatic rings being inclined slightly to one another [α = 11.80 (8)° within a pair and 7.52 (16)° between pairs]. As shown in Fig. 3, the pairs are linked by offset π–π interactions, forming slabs parallel to (001): Cg1⋯Cg2ⁱⁱⁱ = 3.8457 (19) Å within a pair, and Cg1⋯Cg2^iv = 3.5733 (19) Å between pairs; Cg1 and Cg2 are the centroids of rings C1—C6 and N11/C12–C16, respectively; symmetry codes: (iii) 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z; (iv) x − $[{1\over 2}]$ , $[{3\over 2}]$ − y, 1 − z.

Figure 3
Crystal packing viewed along the b axis, showing the stacking of the phenyl and pyridinium groups along that axis.

4. C—H⋯anion interactions in the ¹H NMR spectrum

The C—H⋯anion interactions are clearly manifested in the ¹H NMR spectrum (see Section 5. Synthesis and crystallization). Such an effect has previously been shown by a solution study of the C—H⋯Br interaction on the signals of the ortho- and meta-pyridinium protons in the ¹H NMR spectra of a series of N-(pentafluorobenzyl)pyridinium salts (Giese et al., 2014). The present study in D₂O solvent involves only the pyridinium protons (Ha and Hb) of a series of 4-methyl-1-(4-phenoxybutyl)pyridin-1-ium X⁻ ionic liquids, and the title compound, shown in Fig. 4. The results, given in Table 2, reveal significant shifts for the hydrogen atom Ha in various pyridinium salts, whereas hydrogen atom Hb is only slightly affected by the different counter-anions (Messali, 2015); viz. the study reveals a range of 0.75 p.p.m. for the signals of the ortho-pyridinium protons (Ha) and a shorter range of 0.29 p.p.m. for meta-pyridinium protons (Hb). The determination of the causes behind this variation remains a challenging task for our research group.

Table 2
¹H NMR chemical shifts (D₂O, δ p.p.m.) for the pyridinium hydrogen atoms (Ha and Hb) of a series of ionic liquids (1–7)* and the title salt

Ionic liquid	Anion	Chemical shift for Ha	Chemical shift for Hb
1	Br⁻	d, 9.23	d, 7.67
2	NO₃⁻	d, 9.22	d, 7.66
3	CF₃CO₂⁻	d, 9.09	d, 7.65
4	PF₆⁻	d, 8.94	d, 7.94
5	SCN⁻	d, 8.82	d, 7.80
6	N(CN)₂⁻	d, 8.91	d, 7.75
7	BF₄⁻	d, 8.60	d, 7.69
This study	Br⁻	d, 8.48	d, 7.66
*Messali (2015).

Figure 4
A series of ionic liquids: (a) 4-methyl-1-(4-phenoxybutyl)pyridin-1-ium salts with various counter-anions; (b) this study: 4-methyl-1-(3-phenoxypropyl)pyridinium bromide.

5. Synthesis and crystallization

The synthesis of the title compound is illustrated in Fig. 5. To a solution of 1 g of 4-picoline (10.7 mmol) in 20 ml of toluene, were added 2.53 g of (3-bromopropoxy)benzene (118 mmol) at room temperature, followed by stirring at 355 K for 18 h. The completion of the reaction was marked by the separation of a solid from the initially obtained clear and homogeneous mixture of the starting materials. The product was isolated by filtration to remove the unreacted starting materials and solvent. Subsequently, the title picolinium salt was washed with ethyl acetate. The product was finally dried at reduced pressure to remove all volatile organic compounds. The title compound was obtained as a white solid. Colourless prismatic crystals were obtained by slow evaporation of a solution in dichloromethane.

Figure 5
Synthesis of the title compound.

Spectroscopic and analytical data: ¹H NMR (D₂O, 400 MHz): δ = 2.34 (quint, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.50 (s, 3H), 3.98 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 4.60 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 6.72 (d, 2Ar–H), 6.91 (t, 1Ar–H), 7.21 (t, 2Ar–H), 7.66 (d, 2Ar–H), 8.48 (d, 2Ar–H); ¹³C NMR (D₂O, 100 MHz,): δ = 21.2 (CH₃), 29.4 (CH₂), 58.5 (CH₂), 64.5 (CH₂), 114.4 (CH), 121.5 (CH), 128.5 (CH), 129.8 (CH), 143.2 (CH), 157.4 (C), 160.1 (C); IR (KBr) ν_max 3132 (C—H Ar), 1600–1470 (C=C), 1167(C—N), 1078 (C—O) cm⁻¹; LCMS (M⁺)–Br⁻ 228.1 found for C₁₅H₁₈NO⁺. Elemental analysis for C₁₅H₁₈BrNO (308.21); calculated C 58.45, H 5.89, N 4.54%. Found: C 58.51, H 5.82, N 4.49%.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3. The H atoms were included in idealized positions and treated as riding atoms: C—H = 0.93–0.97 Å with U_iso(H) = 1.5U_eq(C-methyl) and = 1.2U_eq(C) for other H atoms.

Table 3
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	C₁₅H₁₈NO⁺·Br⁻
M_r	308.21
Crystal system, space group	Orthorhombic, Pbca
Temperature (K)	295
a, b, c (Å)	10.3615 (3), 13.8916 (6), 20.2121 (8)
V (Å³)	2909.29 (19)
Z	8
Radiation type	Mo Kα
μ (mm⁻¹)	2.82
Crystal size (mm)	0.60 × 0.19 × 0.10

Data collection
Diffractometer	Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur 3/Sapphire3 CCD
Absorption correction	Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2014 $[Agilent (2014). CrysAlis PRO. Oxford Diffraction Ltd., Abingdon, UK.]$ )
T_min, T_max	0.529, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	38980, 2560, 2212
R_int	0.048
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.595

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.045, 0.087, 1.20
No. of reflections	2560
No. of parameters	164
H-atom treatment	H-atom parameters constrained
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.27, −0.25
Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2014 $[Agilent (2014). CrysAlis PRO. Oxford Diffraction Ltd., Abingdon, UK.]$ ), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ) and ORTEP-3 for Windows and WinGX (Farrugia, 2012 ).

Supporting information

CCDC reference: 1581713

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017015481/su5395sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017015481/su5395Isup2.hkl

Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017015481/su5395Isup3.cdx

Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989017015481/su5395Isup4.cml

checkCIF report

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2014); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2014); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2014); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015) and WinGX (Farrugia, 2012).

4-Methyl-1-(3-phenoxypropyl)pyridinium bromide top

Crystal data top

C₁₅H₁₈NO⁺·Br⁻	D_x = 1.407 Mg m⁻³
M_r = 308.21	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, Pbca	Cell parameters from 5457 reflections
a = 10.3615 (3) Å	θ = 3.2–25.6°
b = 13.8916 (6) Å	µ = 2.82 mm⁻¹
c = 20.2121 (8) Å	T = 295 K
V = 2909.29 (19) Å³	Prism, colourless
Z = 8	0.60 × 0.19 × 0.10 mm
F(000) = 1264

Data collection top

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur 3/Sapphire3 CCD diffractometer	2560 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source	2212 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator	R_int = 0.048
Detector resolution: 16.0050 pixels mm^-1	θ_max = 25.0°, θ_min = 3.6°
Thin slice φ and ω scans	h = −12→12
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis Pro; Agilent, 2014)	k = −16→16
T_min = 0.529, T_max = 1.000	l = −24→24
38980 measured reflections

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full	Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.045	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F²) = 0.087	H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.20	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0313P)² + 1.5286P] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
2560 reflections	(Δ/σ)_max = 0.001
164 parameters	Δρ_max = 0.27 e Å⁻³
0 restraints	Δρ_min = −0.25 e Å⁻³

Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
Br1	0.33702 (3)	0.68529 (3)	0.38455 (2)	0.05802 (14)
C1	0.3412 (3)	0.6101 (2)	0.61560 (14)	0.0449 (7)
C2	0.2231 (3)	0.6169 (2)	0.58402 (17)	0.0497 (8)
H2	0.2174	0.6070	0.5386	0.060*
C3	0.1146 (4)	0.6382 (3)	0.6199 (2)	0.0665 (10)
H3	0.0352	0.6421	0.5986	0.080*
C4	0.1213 (4)	0.6540 (3)	0.6864 (2)	0.0768 (12)
H4	0.0471	0.6694	0.7101	0.092*
C5	0.2377 (4)	0.6470 (3)	0.71827 (19)	0.0756 (11)
H5	0.2422	0.6578	0.7636	0.091*
C6	0.3494 (3)	0.6241 (3)	0.68326 (16)	0.0567 (9)
H6	0.4281	0.6182	0.7050	0.068*
O7	0.44380 (18)	0.58949 (16)	0.57589 (10)	0.0516 (6)
C8	0.5707 (3)	0.5894 (2)	0.60379 (14)	0.0487 (8)
H8A	0.5792	0.5381	0.6360	0.058*
H8B	0.5880	0.6503	0.6256	0.058*
C9	0.6631 (3)	0.5744 (2)	0.54734 (16)	0.0514 (8)
H9A	0.6427	0.5145	0.5250	0.062*
H9B	0.7504	0.5696	0.5644	0.062*
C10	0.6554 (3)	0.6566 (2)	0.49855 (15)	0.0478 (7)
H10A	0.5687	0.6602	0.4806	0.057*
H10B	0.6732	0.7167	0.5213	0.057*
N11	0.7491 (2)	0.64405 (17)	0.44343 (11)	0.0400 (6)
C12	0.7086 (3)	0.6251 (2)	0.38199 (15)	0.0440 (7)
H12	0.6206	0.6203	0.3734	0.053*
C13	0.7952 (3)	0.6126 (2)	0.33169 (15)	0.0469 (7)
H13	0.7657	0.5996	0.2892	0.056*
C14	0.9257 (3)	0.6192 (2)	0.34333 (15)	0.0439 (7)
C15	0.9652 (3)	0.6400 (2)	0.40727 (15)	0.0500 (8)
H15	1.0527	0.6449	0.4169	0.060*
C16	0.8761 (3)	0.6533 (2)	0.45620 (16)	0.0493 (8)
H16	0.9033	0.6688	0.4987	0.059*
C17	1.0219 (3)	0.6050 (3)	0.28885 (17)	0.0680 (10)
H17A	1.0431	0.5379	0.2854	0.102*
H17B	1.0986	0.6411	0.2984	0.102*
H17C	0.9856	0.6268	0.2478	0.102*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
Br1	0.0428 (2)	0.0664 (2)	0.0649 (2)	−0.00036 (16)	0.00019 (15)	−0.00230 (18)
C1	0.0509 (17)	0.0394 (16)	0.0444 (17)	−0.0034 (14)	0.0090 (15)	0.0015 (14)
C2	0.0513 (18)	0.0434 (19)	0.0544 (18)	0.0051 (15)	0.0028 (16)	0.0044 (15)
C3	0.0530 (19)	0.057 (2)	0.089 (3)	0.0066 (18)	0.014 (2)	0.012 (2)
C4	0.073 (3)	0.068 (3)	0.089 (3)	0.002 (2)	0.043 (2)	0.005 (2)
C5	0.104 (3)	0.069 (3)	0.053 (2)	−0.011 (2)	0.030 (2)	−0.0030 (19)
C6	0.066 (2)	0.062 (2)	0.0421 (18)	−0.0088 (17)	0.0079 (16)	−0.0033 (16)
O7	0.0421 (11)	0.0718 (16)	0.0410 (11)	0.0003 (10)	0.0042 (10)	−0.0120 (11)
C8	0.0472 (17)	0.054 (2)	0.0446 (17)	−0.0009 (15)	−0.0007 (14)	0.0019 (15)
C9	0.0454 (17)	0.0531 (19)	0.0557 (19)	0.0045 (15)	0.0050 (15)	0.0003 (16)
C10	0.0431 (16)	0.0490 (18)	0.0513 (18)	0.0030 (14)	0.0041 (14)	−0.0031 (15)
N11	0.0347 (12)	0.0386 (14)	0.0468 (14)	0.0002 (10)	0.0003 (11)	−0.0012 (11)
C12	0.0374 (15)	0.0456 (18)	0.0489 (18)	−0.0023 (13)	−0.0103 (14)	0.0005 (15)
C13	0.0490 (17)	0.0508 (19)	0.0407 (16)	−0.0033 (15)	−0.0055 (14)	−0.0008 (14)
C14	0.0466 (16)	0.0400 (17)	0.0452 (17)	−0.0042 (14)	0.0036 (14)	0.0014 (14)
C15	0.0324 (15)	0.062 (2)	0.0554 (19)	−0.0070 (15)	−0.0019 (14)	−0.0028 (16)
C16	0.0410 (16)	0.061 (2)	0.0462 (18)	−0.0061 (15)	−0.0059 (14)	−0.0058 (16)
C17	0.062 (2)	0.082 (3)	0.059 (2)	−0.007 (2)	0.0151 (18)	−0.0050 (19)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

C1—O7	1.362 (3)	C9—H9B	0.9700
C1—C2	1.383 (4)	C10—N11	1.488 (4)
C1—C6	1.384 (4)	C10—H10A	0.9700
C2—C3	1.371 (5)	C10—H10B	0.9700
C2—H2	0.9300	N11—C12	1.337 (3)
C3—C4	1.364 (5)	N11—C16	1.347 (4)
C3—H3	0.9300	C12—C13	1.368 (4)
C4—C5	1.371 (6)	C12—H12	0.9300
C4—H4	0.9300	C13—C14	1.375 (4)
C5—C6	1.393 (5)	C13—H13	0.9300
C5—H5	0.9300	C14—C15	1.386 (4)
C6—H6	0.9300	C14—C17	1.498 (4)
O7—C8	1.431 (3)	C15—C16	1.365 (4)
C8—C9	1.505 (4)	C15—H15	0.9300
C8—H8A	0.9700	C16—H16	0.9300
C8—H8B	0.9700	C17—H17A	0.9600
C9—C10	1.511 (4)	C17—H17B	0.9600
C9—H9A	0.9700	C17—H17C	0.9600

O7—C1—C2	115.6 (3)	N11—C10—C9	111.4 (2)
O7—C1—C6	124.3 (3)	N11—C10—H10A	109.3
C2—C1—C6	120.0 (3)	C9—C10—H10A	109.3
C3—C2—C1	119.8 (3)	N11—C10—H10B	109.3
C3—C2—H2	120.1	C9—C10—H10B	109.3
C1—C2—H2	120.1	H10A—C10—H10B	108.0
C4—C3—C2	120.9 (4)	C12—N11—C16	120.2 (2)
C4—C3—H3	119.5	C12—N11—C10	120.9 (2)
C2—C3—H3	119.5	C16—N11—C10	118.9 (2)
C3—C4—C5	119.8 (4)	N11—C12—C13	120.6 (3)
C3—C4—H4	120.1	N11—C12—H12	119.7
C5—C4—H4	120.1	C13—C12—H12	119.7
C4—C5—C6	120.6 (3)	C12—C13—C14	120.7 (3)
C4—C5—H5	119.7	C12—C13—H13	119.7
C6—C5—H5	119.7	C14—C13—H13	119.7
C1—C6—C5	118.9 (3)	C13—C14—C15	117.6 (3)
C1—C6—H6	120.6	C13—C14—C17	121.3 (3)
C5—C6—H6	120.6	C15—C14—C17	121.1 (3)
C1—O7—C8	119.0 (2)	C16—C15—C14	120.3 (3)
O7—C8—C9	106.6 (2)	C16—C15—H15	119.9
O7—C8—H8A	110.4	C14—C15—H15	119.9
C9—C8—H8A	110.4	N11—C16—C15	120.6 (3)
O7—C8—H8B	110.4	N11—C16—H16	119.7
C9—C8—H8B	110.4	C15—C16—H16	119.7
H8A—C8—H8B	108.6	C14—C17—H17A	109.5
C8—C9—C10	110.9 (3)	C14—C17—H17B	109.5
C8—C9—H9A	109.5	H17A—C17—H17B	109.5
C10—C9—H9A	109.5	C14—C17—H17C	109.5
C8—C9—H9B	109.5	H17A—C17—H17C	109.5
C10—C9—H9B	109.5	H17B—C17—H17C	109.5
H9A—C9—H9B	108.1

O7—C1—C2—C3	−179.4 (3)	C9—C10—N11—C12	111.0 (3)
C6—C1—C2—C3	0.5 (5)	C9—C10—N11—C16	−69.8 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4	0.7 (5)	C16—N11—C12—C13	1.5 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C5	−1.0 (6)	C10—N11—C12—C13	−179.3 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C6	0.0 (6)	N11—C12—C13—C14	0.1 (5)
O7—C1—C6—C5	178.5 (3)	C12—C13—C14—C15	−0.8 (5)
C2—C1—C6—C5	−1.4 (5)	C12—C13—C14—C17	179.5 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C1	1.2 (5)	C13—C14—C15—C16	0.0 (5)
C2—C1—O7—C8	174.7 (3)	C17—C14—C15—C16	179.6 (3)
C6—C1—O7—C8	−5.3 (4)	C12—N11—C16—C15	−2.4 (5)
C1—O7—C8—C9	−174.5 (3)	C10—N11—C16—C15	178.4 (3)
O7—C8—C9—C10	62.9 (3)	C14—C15—C16—N11	1.6 (5)
C8—C9—C10—N11	178.4 (2)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
C10—H10A···O7	0.97	2.52	2.850 (3)	100
C10—H10B···Br1ⁱ	0.97	2.89	3.735 (3)	146
C10—H10A···Br1	0.97	3.11	4.043 (3)	163
C12—H12···Br1	0.93	3.08	3.940 (3)	154
C15—H15···Br1ⁱⁱ	0.93	3.07	3.931 (3)	155
C17—H17B···Br1ⁱⁱ	0.96	3.08	3.956 (4)	152

Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/2, −y+3/2, −z+1; (ii) x+1, y, z.

¹H NMR chemical shifts (D₂O, δ p.p.m.) for the pyridinium hydrogen atoms (Ha and Hb) of a series of ionic liquids (1–7)* and the title salt. top

Ionic liquid	Anion	Chemical shift for Ha	Chemical shift for Hb
1	Br^-	d, 9.23	d, 7.67
2	NO₃^-	d, 9.22	d, 7.66
3	CF₃CO₂^-	d, 9.09	d, 7.65
4	PF₆^-	d, 8.94	d, 7.94
5	SCN^-	d, 8.82	d, 7.80
6	N(CN)₂^-	d, 8.91	d, 7.75
7	BF₄^-	d, 8.60	d, 7.69
This study	Br^-	d, 8.48	d, 7.66

*Messali (2015).

References

Agilent (2014). CrysAlis PRO. Oxford Diffraction Ltd., Abingdon, UK.
Anders, E., Tropsch, J. G., Irmer, E. & Sheldrick, G. M. (1990). Chem. Ber. 123, 321–325. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science
Bremner, J. B., Samosorn, S., Skelton, B. W. & White, A. H. (2011). Molecules, 16, 7627–7633. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed
Brennecke, J. F. & Maginn, E. J. (2001). AIChE J. 47, 2384–2389. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
Davis, J. H. Jr (2004). Chem. Lett. 33, 1072–1077. CAS
Endres, F. (2002). ChemPhysChem, 3, 144–154. CrossRef CAS
Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
Giese, M., Albrecht, M., Repenko, T., Sackmann, J., Valkonen, A. & Rissanen, K. (2014). Eur. J. Org. Chem. pp. 2435–2442. Web of Science CSD CrossRef
Ibrahim, M. A. M., Messali, M., Moussa, Z., Alzahrani, A. Y., Alamry, S. N. & Hammouti, B. (2011). Port. Electrochim. Acta, 29, 375–389. CrossRef CAS
Kawano, R., Matsui, H., Matsuyama, C., Sato, A., Susan, M. A. B. H., Tanabe, N. & Watanabe, M. (2004). J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 164, 87–92. CrossRef CAS
Kubisa, P. (2004). Prog. Polym. Sci. 29, 3–12. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
Messali, M. (2015). Acta Pharm. 65, 253–270. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed
Messali, M. (2016). Arab. J. Chem. 9, S564–S569. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
Messali, M., Aouad, M. R., El-Sayed, W. S., Ali, A. A., Ben Hadda, T. & Hammouti, B. (2014). Molecules, 19, 11741–11759. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals
Shi, F., Gu, Y., Zhang, Q. & Deng, Y. (2004). Catal. Surv. Asia, 8, 179–186. Web of Science CrossRef CAS
Souza, R. F. de, Padilha, J. C., Gonçalves, R. S. & Rault-Berthelot, J. L. (2006). Electrochem. Commun. 8, 211–216.
Wang, J.-H., Cheng, D.-H., Chen, X.-Y., Du, Z. & Fang, Z.-L. (2007). Anal. Chem. 79, 620–625. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.