Crystal structure of N,N′-dibenzyl-3,3′-di­meth­oxy­benzidine

Im, H.; Kim, J.; Sim, C.; Kim, T.H.

doi:10.1107/S2056989018001688

research communications

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 74| Part 3| March 2018| Pages 271-274

https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989018001688

Open

access

Crystal structure of N,N′-dibenzyl-3,3′-dimethoxybenzidine

Hansu Im,^a Jineun Kim,^a ^* Changeun Sim ^a and Tae Ho Kim ^a ^*

^aDepartment of Chemistry (BK21 plus) and Research Institute of Natural Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea
^*Correspondence e-mail: thkim@gnu.ac.kr, jekim@gnu.ac.kr

Edited by J. Simpson, University of Otago, New Zealand (Received 10 January 2018; accepted 29 January 2018; online 2 February 2018)

The title compound, (systematic name: N,N′-dibenzyl-3,3′-dimethoxy-1,1′-biphenyl-4,4′-diamine), C₂₈H₂₈N₂O₂, was synthesized by the reduction of a Schiff base prepared via a condensation reaction between o-dianisidine and benzaldehyde under acidic conditions. The molecule lies on a crystallographic inversion centre so that the asymmetric unit contains one half-molecule. The biphenyl moiety compound is essentially planar. Two intramolecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds occur. The dihedral angle between the terminal phenyl and phenylene rings of a benzidine unit is 48.68 (6)°. The methylene C atom of the benzyl group is disordered over two sets of sites, with occupancy ratio 0.779 (18):0.221 (18). In the crystal, molecules are connected by hydrogen bonding between o-dianisidine O atoms and H atoms of the terminal benzyl groups, forming a one-dimensional ladder-like structure. In the data from DFT calculations, the central biphenyl showed a twisted conformation.

Keywords: crystal structure; hydrogen bond; one-dimensional ladder; o-dianisidine.

CCDC reference: 1820338

1. Chemical context

Benzidine derivatives have received increasing attention in recent years beacuse of their applications in a wide variety of domains, for instance as building blocks in the construction of functionalized organic/organometallic materials and as sensor materials (Hmadeh et al., 2008 ; Satapathi, 2015 ; Nagaraja et al., 2017 ). The chemical and physical properties of benzidine-based compounds have enabled their use in cell biology as staining reagents (Liu et al., 2004 ). Benzidine derivatives are also relevant examples of simple redox systems, which could find applications as OLEDs (Zhang et al., 2004 ) or electroactive organic polymeric compounds (D'Eramo et al., 1994 ). Recently, we have reported copper(I) coordination polymers based on pyromellitic diimide derivatives, and shown that photoluminescence emission peaks are shifted depending on the solvent (Kang et al., 2015 ). In an extension of previous research, we have synthesized a benzidine derivative as a diamine intermediate, in which a benzidine moiety was used instead of a pyromellitic diimide spacer unit, and report its crystal structure here.

2. Structural commentary

The molecular structure of the title compound consists of a central dimethoxybenzidine unit and two terminal benzyl groups (Fig. 1). The molecule lies about a crystallographic inversion centre at the midpoint of the C4—C4(−x, −y, −z + 1) bond, thus the asymmetric unit contains one half-molecule. The dihedral angle between the terminal phenyl and phenylene rings of a benzidine unit is 48.68 (6)°. Disorder was modelled for the methylene C atom of the benzyl group over two sets of sites with an occupancy ratio of 0.779 (18):0.221 (18). The biphenyl moiety is strictly planar [dihedral angle between rings = 0°; maximum deviation of 0.015 (2) Å for atom C3]. There is no pronounced anisotropy in the aryl anisotropic displacement parameters, indicating that there is no disorder or dynamic twisting process to accommodate the steric crowding of the ortho H atoms of the biphenyl moiety (El-Shafei et al., 2003 ). The molecular conformation is in part influenced by the formation of weak intramolecular N1—H1⋯O1 hydrogen bonds that enclose S(5) rings (Fig. 1, Table 1).

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
C10—H10⋯O1ⁱ	0.95	2.66	3.400 (2)	135
N1—H1⋯O1	0.88	2.33	2.6464 (19)	101
Symmetry code: (i) x+1, y, z.

Figure 1
The asymmetric unit of the title compound, with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms are shown as small spheres of arbitrary radius and yellow dashed lines represent the intramolecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. Unlabelled atoms are generated by the symmetry operation (−x, −y, −z + 1).

3. Supramolecular features

In the crystal, neighbouring molecules are linked by C10—H10⋯O1 hydrogen bonds (Table 1; yellow dashed lines in Fig. 2) that generate R₂²(24) rings. These contacts stack adjacent molecules, forming a one-dimensional ladder-like structure (Fig. 2). Neighbouring stacks of molecules in these ladders are not connected but lie parallel to the (01 $[\overline{2}]$ ) plane (Fig. 3).

Figure 2
C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (orange dashed lines) link adjacent molecules. H atoms not involved in intermolecular interactions have been omitted for clarity.

Figure 3
Overall packing diagram of title compound, showing the one-dimensional ladder structure (hydrogen bonds drawn as orange dashed lines). H atoms not involved in intermolecular interactions have been omitted for clarity.

4. Database survey

The Cambridge Database (Version 5.27, last update February 2017; Groom et al., 2016 ) reveals polymorphs of related biphenyl derivatives that have both twisted and planar biphenyl conformations (Hoser et al., 2012 ). However, in the biphenyl compounds 4,4′-diamino-2,2′,6,6′-tetramethylbiphenyl (Batsanov et al., 2006 ), 2,2′-dichloro-5,5′-dipropoxybenzidine and 2,2′-dimethyl-5,5′-dipropoxybenzidine (El-Shafei et al., 2004 ), in which atoms other than hydrogen are substituted in the ortho positions of the biphenyl unit, adopt twisted biphenyl conformations due to steric repulsion between substituted atoms. Hybrid inorganic–organic complexes with benzidine dications display structures with either twisted or planar conformations for the benzidine unit and, in some case, even both conformations (Dobrzycki & Woźniak, 2009 ). Related structures with an essentially planar benzidine conformation include 3,3′-dipropoxybenzidine (El-Shafei et al., 2003), N,N-bis(diphenylphosphino)benzidine (Kayan et al., 2012 ) and N,N′-bis(4-chlorobenzylidene)-3,3′-dimethoxybiphenyl-4,4′-diamine (Subashini et al., 2011 ).

5. Theoretical calculations

DFT calculations have been performed to support the experimental values on the basis of the diffraction study using the GAUSSIAN09 software package (Frisch et al., 2009 ). Full geometry optimizations were performed using B3LYP levels of theory with a 6-311G* basis set. The bond lengths of the optimized parameter are in excellent agreement with the experimental crystallographic data (Table 2). Interestingly, however, while the central biphenyl conformation from the crystal structure is found to be planar, that from the DFT calculations shows an angle of 37.67° between the two aromatic rings, Fig. 4. Furthermore, the dihedral angle between the terminal phenyl and phenylene rings of the title compound is 48.68 (6)° from the crystallographic data but 76.69° from the DFT calculation. Similarly, as a result of the twisted conformation found in the DFT calculations, the lengths of the intramolecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds from the X-ray and DFT calculation data are also slightly different, at 2.33 and 2.21 Å, respectively.

Table 2
Experimental and calculated bond lengths (Å)

Bond	X-ray	B3LYP (6–311G*)
O1—C1	1.425 (2)	1.4208
O1—C2	1.374 (3)	1.3744
N1—C7	1.394 (2)	1.3872
N1—C8	1.438 (5)	1.4567
C2—C3	1.378 (2)	1.3859
C3—C4	1.399 (2)	1.4104
C4—C5	1.389 (2)	1.3951
C5—C6	1.386 (2)	1.3964
C6—C7	1.385 (2)	1.3972
C2—C7	1.408 (2)	1.4189
C8—C9	1.498 (6)	1.5139
C9—C10	1.389 (3)	1.400)
C10—C11	1.379 (3)	1.3921
C11—C12	1.380 (2)	1.3966
C12—C13	1.377 (3)	1.3923
C13—C14	1.383 (3)	1.3965
C9—C14	1.382 (2)	1.3976
C4—C4ⁱ	1.491 (2)	1.4823
Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y, −z + 1.

Figure 4
The central biphenyl conformation from the crystallographic data is planar (a), while that from the DFT calculations is twisted (b).

6. Synthesis and crystallization

A mixture of o-dianisidine (4.88 g, 20 mmol), benzaldehyde (4.71 g, 40 mmol) and acetic acid (2.47 g, 40 mmol) in 30 mL of toluene and 7 mL of ethanol was heated at refluxed for 6 h. Sodium borohydride (1.62 g, 40 mmol) was added and the mixture was refluxed for two h. After cooling to room temperature, water was added to the reaction mixture. The organic layer was collected and the water layer was extracted with dichloromethane. The combined organic layer was dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate then evaporated to give a solid. Column chromatography (silica gel, ethyl acetate/hexane = 30/70 (v/v) gave the pure product. Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained by slow evaporation of an ethyl acetate/n-hexane solution (v/v = 30/70) of the title compound. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO): δ = 8.31 (s, 2H, CHCO), 7.28 (m, 10H, phenyl), 6.64 (d, 2H, CCHC), 6.41 (d, 2H, CHCN), 5.52 (t, 2H, NH), 4.33 (d, 4H, CH₂), 3.88 (s, 6H, CH₃).

7. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3. All H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model: C—H = 0.95–0.99 Å with U_iso(H) = 1.2U_eq(C). The methylene C8 atom of the benzyl group is disordered over two sets of sites. Their occupancies refined to 0.779 (18) and 0.221 (18).

Table 3
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	C₂₈H₂₈N₂O₂
M_r	424.52
Crystal system, space group	Triclinic, P $[\overline{1}]$
Temperature (K)	173
a, b, c (Å)	4.7089 (2), 9.6760 (4), 12.1952 (5)
α, β, γ (°)	93.387 (3), 92.165 (2), 103.180 (2)
V (Å³)	539.32 (4)
Z	1
Radiation type	Mo Kα
μ (mm⁻¹)	0.08
Crystal size (mm)	0.31 × 0.18 × 0.06

Data collection
Diffractometer	Bruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correction	Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014 )
T_min, T_max	0.659, 0.746
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	6528, 1888, 1683
R_int	0.019
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.594

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.048, 0.145, 1.10
No. of reflections	1888
No. of parameters	156
No. of restraints	6
H-atom treatment	H-atom parameters constrained
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.37, −0.60
Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2014), SHELXS97 and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2010 ) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ).

Supporting information

CCDC reference: 1820338

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, New_Global_Publ_Block. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989018001688/sj5545sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989018001688/sj5545Isup2.hkl

Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989018001688/sj5545Isup3.cml

checkCIF report

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2014); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2014); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2014); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2010); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

N,N'-dibenzyl-3,3'-dimethoxy-1,1'-biphenyl-4,4'-diamine top

Crystal data top

C₂₈H₂₈N₂O₂	Z = 1
M_r = 424.52	F(000) = 226
Triclinic, P1	D_x = 1.307 Mg m⁻³
a = 4.7089 (2) Å	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 9.6760 (4) Å	Cell parameters from 5519 reflections
c = 12.1952 (5) Å	θ = 2.6–28.0°
α = 93.387 (3)°	µ = 0.08 mm⁻¹
β = 92.165 (2)°	T = 173 K
γ = 103.180 (2)°	Plate, yellow
V = 539.32 (4) Å³	0.31 × 0.18 × 0.06 mm

Data collection top

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer	1683 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ and ω scans	R_int = 0.019
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2014)	θ_max = 25.0°, θ_min = 1.7°
T_min = 0.659, T_max = 0.746	h = −5→5
6528 measured reflections	k = −11→11
1888 independent reflections	l = −13→14

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	6 restraints
Least-squares matrix: full	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.048	H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F²) = 0.145	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0797P)² + 0.2226P] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
S = 1.10	(Δ/σ)_max < 0.001
1888 reflections	Δρ_max = 0.37 e Å⁻³
156 parameters	Δρ_min = −0.60 e Å⁻³

Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq	Occ. (<1)
O1	0.2453 (3)	0.22554 (13)	0.81729 (9)	0.0350 (4)
N1	0.6872 (3)	0.38961 (16)	0.72486 (12)	0.0367 (4)
H1	0.6890	0.3862	0.7968	0.044*
C1	−0.0076 (4)	0.15213 (19)	0.86818 (14)	0.0355 (4)
H1A	−0.1827	0.1701	0.8312	0.053*
H1B	0.0024	0.1860	0.9459	0.053*
H1C	−0.0163	0.0498	0.8625	0.053*
C2	0.2594 (3)	0.19646 (17)	0.70622 (13)	0.0275 (4)
C3	0.0682 (3)	0.08840 (16)	0.64431 (13)	0.0270 (4)
H3	−0.0911	0.0316	0.6786	0.032*
C4	0.1022 (3)	0.06000 (16)	0.53238 (13)	0.0261 (4)
C5	0.3347 (4)	0.14802 (18)	0.48559 (14)	0.0328 (4)
H5	0.3646	0.1318	0.4098	0.039*
C6	0.5243 (4)	0.25895 (18)	0.54660 (14)	0.0329 (4)
H6	0.6790	0.3178	0.5114	0.039*
C7	0.4931 (3)	0.28575 (17)	0.65775 (14)	0.0284 (4)
C8	0.8843 (16)	0.5024 (3)	0.6758 (5)	0.0414 (13)	0.779 (18)
H8A	0.7710	0.5531	0.6291	0.050*	0.779 (18)
H8B	1.0144	0.4613	0.6282	0.050*	0.779 (18)
C8'	0.791 (3)	0.4999 (12)	0.7085 (11)	0.023 (3)	0.221 (18)
H8'1	0.6326	0.5513	0.7158	0.028*	0.221 (18)
H8'2	0.8268	0.4949	0.6291	0.028*	0.221 (18)
C9	1.0656 (4)	0.60586 (18)	0.76161 (15)	0.0336 (4)
C10	1.1686 (4)	0.56526 (18)	0.86005 (15)	0.0373 (5)
H10	1.1067	0.4695	0.8787	0.045*
C11	1.3596 (4)	0.66246 (19)	0.93095 (14)	0.0368 (4)
H11	1.4302	0.6334	0.9978	0.044*
C12	1.4480 (4)	0.80198 (18)	0.90472 (15)	0.0370 (4)
H12	1.5781	0.8693	0.9538	0.044*
C13	1.3474 (4)	0.84355 (18)	0.80734 (15)	0.0357 (4)
H13	1.4098	0.9394	0.7889	0.043*
C14	1.1558 (4)	0.74595 (18)	0.73633 (14)	0.0339 (4)
H14	1.0855	0.7754	0.6696	0.041*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
O1	0.0359 (7)	0.0396 (7)	0.0222 (6)	−0.0042 (5)	0.0004 (5)	−0.0061 (5)
N1	0.0347 (8)	0.0398 (9)	0.0262 (8)	−0.0081 (7)	0.0009 (6)	−0.0086 (6)
C1	0.0359 (9)	0.0416 (10)	0.0252 (9)	0.0021 (7)	0.0029 (7)	−0.0022 (7)
C2	0.0303 (8)	0.0285 (8)	0.0224 (8)	0.0056 (6)	−0.0033 (6)	−0.0015 (6)
C3	0.0277 (8)	0.0256 (8)	0.0253 (8)	0.0017 (6)	−0.0015 (6)	0.0008 (6)
C4	0.0270 (8)	0.0258 (8)	0.0244 (8)	0.0050 (7)	−0.0047 (7)	−0.0001 (6)
C5	0.0333 (9)	0.0375 (9)	0.0228 (8)	−0.0001 (7)	−0.0019 (7)	−0.0028 (7)
C6	0.0307 (9)	0.0339 (9)	0.0286 (9)	−0.0033 (7)	0.0007 (7)	0.0001 (7)
C7	0.0265 (8)	0.0285 (8)	0.0273 (9)	0.0025 (6)	−0.0043 (6)	−0.0023 (6)
C8	0.048 (2)	0.0322 (14)	0.037 (3)	−0.0026 (15)	−0.014 (2)	−0.0002 (13)
C8'	0.022 (4)	0.029 (4)	0.018 (4)	0.005 (3)	0.011 (3)	0.003 (3)
C9	0.0356 (9)	0.0290 (9)	0.0328 (9)	0.0032 (7)	−0.0054 (7)	−0.0041 (7)
C10	0.0454 (10)	0.0255 (8)	0.0366 (10)	0.0003 (7)	−0.0055 (8)	0.0017 (7)
C11	0.0429 (10)	0.0362 (10)	0.0272 (9)	0.0023 (8)	−0.0065 (8)	0.0008 (7)
C12	0.0346 (9)	0.0331 (9)	0.0367 (10)	−0.0027 (7)	−0.0055 (8)	−0.0056 (7)
C13	0.0351 (9)	0.0276 (9)	0.0405 (10)	−0.0009 (7)	0.0001 (8)	0.0033 (7)
C14	0.0368 (9)	0.0337 (9)	0.0298 (9)	0.0055 (7)	−0.0010 (7)	0.0033 (7)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

O1—C2	1.374 (2)	C6—H6	0.9500
O1—C1	1.425 (2)	C8—C9	1.498 (3)
N1—C8'	1.100 (12)	C8—H8A	0.9900
N1—C7	1.394 (2)	C8—H8B	0.9900
N1—C8	1.438 (7)	C8'—C9	1.549 (11)
N1—H1	0.8800	C8'—H8'1	0.9900
C1—H1A	0.9800	C8'—H8'2	0.9900
C1—H1B	0.9800	C9—C14	1.382 (2)
C1—H1C	0.9800	C9—C10	1.389 (3)
C2—C3	1.378 (2)	C10—C11	1.379 (2)
C2—C7	1.408 (2)	C10—H10	0.9500
C3—C4	1.399 (2)	C11—C12	1.379 (2)
C3—H3	0.9500	C11—H11	0.9500
C4—C5	1.389 (2)	C12—C13	1.377 (3)
C4—C4ⁱ	1.491 (3)	C12—H12	0.9500
C5—C6	1.386 (2)	C13—C14	1.383 (2)
C5—H5	0.9500	C13—H13	0.9500
C6—C7	1.385 (2)	C14—H14	0.9500

C2—O1—C1	117.19 (12)	C9—C8—H8A	109.3
C8'—N1—C7	129.4 (6)	N1—C8—H8B	109.3
C7—N1—C8	119.6 (2)	C9—C8—H8B	109.3
C7—N1—H1	120.2	H8A—C8—H8B	108.0
C8—N1—H1	120.2	N1—C8'—C9	131.8 (9)
O1—C1—H1A	109.5	N1—C8'—H8'1	104.3
O1—C1—H1B	109.5	C9—C8'—H8'1	104.3
H1A—C1—H1B	109.5	N1—C8'—H8'2	104.3
O1—C1—H1C	109.5	C9—C8'—H8'2	104.3
H1A—C1—H1C	109.5	H8'1—C8'—H8'2	105.6
H1B—C1—H1C	109.5	C14—C9—C10	118.83 (15)
O1—C2—C3	124.56 (15)	C14—C9—C8	117.8 (2)
O1—C2—C7	114.59 (14)	C10—C9—C8	123.1 (2)
C3—C2—C7	120.84 (15)	C14—C9—C8'	124.5 (4)
C2—C3—C4	121.84 (15)	C10—C9—C8'	114.0 (5)
C2—C3—H3	119.1	C11—C10—C9	120.71 (16)
C4—C3—H3	119.1	C11—C10—H10	119.6
C5—C4—C3	116.84 (15)	C9—C10—H10	119.6
C5—C4—C4ⁱ	122.18 (18)	C10—C11—C12	119.89 (16)
C3—C4—C4ⁱ	120.98 (18)	C10—C11—H11	120.1
C6—C5—C4	121.75 (16)	C12—C11—H11	120.1
C6—C5—H5	119.1	C13—C12—C11	119.95 (16)
C4—C5—H5	119.1	C13—C12—H12	120.0
C7—C6—C5	121.41 (16)	C11—C12—H12	120.0
C7—C6—H6	119.3	C12—C13—C14	120.10 (16)
C5—C6—H6	119.3	C12—C13—H13	120.0
C6—C7—N1	124.04 (15)	C14—C13—H13	120.0
C6—C7—C2	117.31 (15)	C9—C14—C13	120.52 (16)
N1—C7—C2	118.54 (15)	C9—C14—H14	119.7
N1—C8—C9	111.4 (4)	C13—C14—H14	119.7
N1—C8—H8A	109.3

C1—O1—C2—C3	−9.3 (2)	C3—C2—C7—N1	−177.38 (14)
C1—O1—C2—C7	171.68 (14)	C7—N1—C8—C9	177.7 (3)
O1—C2—C3—C4	−176.98 (14)	C7—N1—C8'—C9	−160.1 (9)
C7—C2—C3—C4	1.9 (2)	N1—C8—C9—C14	−149.9 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C5	−1.4 (2)	N1—C8—C9—C10	36.3 (6)
C2—C3—C4—C4ⁱ	178.26 (16)	N1—C8'—C9—C14	−175.1 (12)
C3—C4—C5—C6	−0.1 (3)	N1—C8'—C9—C10	−13.8 (19)
C4ⁱ—C4—C5—C6	−179.73 (17)	C14—C9—C10—C11	−0.6 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C7	1.0 (3)	C8—C9—C10—C11	173.1 (4)
C5—C6—C7—N1	175.71 (16)	C8'—C9—C10—C11	−163.1 (6)
C5—C6—C7—C2	−0.5 (3)	C9—C10—C11—C12	0.6 (3)
C8'—N1—C7—C6	43.5 (11)	C10—C11—C12—C13	−0.6 (3)
C8—N1—C7—C6	18.3 (4)	C11—C12—C13—C14	0.6 (3)
C8'—N1—C7—C2	−140.3 (11)	C10—C9—C14—C13	0.6 (3)
C8—N1—C7—C2	−165.6 (3)	C8—C9—C14—C13	−173.5 (4)
O1—C2—C7—C6	178.08 (14)	C8'—C9—C14—C13	161.1 (7)
C3—C2—C7—C6	−0.9 (2)	C12—C13—C14—C9	−0.6 (3)
O1—C2—C7—N1	1.6 (2)

Symmetry code: (i) −x, −y, −z+1.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
C10—H10···O1ⁱⁱ	0.95	2.66	3.400 (2)	135
N1—H1···O1	0.88	2.33	2.6464 (19)	101

Symmetry code: (ii) x+1, y, z.

Experimental and calculated bond lengths (Å) top

Bond	X-ray	B3LYP (6-311G*)
O1—C1	1.425 (2)	1.4208
O1—C2	1.374 (3)	1.3744
N1—C7	1.394 (2)	1.3872
N1—C8	1.438 (5)	1.4567
C2—C3	1.378 (2)	1.3859
C3—C4	1.399 (2)	1.4104
C4—C5	1.389 (2)	1.3951
C5—C6	1.386 (2)	1.3964
C6—C7	1.385 (2)	1.3972
C2—C7	1.408 (2)	1.4189
C8—C9	1.498 (6)	1.5139
C9—C10	1.389 (3)	1.400)
C10—C11	1.379 (3)	1.3921
C11—C12	1.380 (2)	1.3966
C12—C13	1.377 (3)	1.3923
C13—C14	1.383 (3)	1.3965
C9—C14	1.382 (2)	1.3976
C4—C4ⁱ	1.491 (2)	1.4823

Symmetry code: (i) -x, -y, -z + 1.

Funding information

This research was supported by the Basic Science Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (Nos. 2015R1D1A4A01020317 and 2017R1D1A3A03000534)

References

Batsanov, A. S., Low, P. J. & Paterson, M. A. J. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o2973–o2975. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Brandenburg, K. (2010). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Bruker (2014). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
D'Eramo, F., Arévalo, A. H., Silber, J. J. & Sereno, L. (1994). J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 5, 213–218. CAS Google Scholar
Dobrzycki, L. & Woźniak, K. (2009). J. Mol. Struct. 921, 18–33. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
El-Shafei, A., Boyle, P. D., Hinks, D. & Freeman, H. S. (2003). Acta Cryst. C59, o71–o73. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
El-Shafei, A., Hinks, D., Boyle, P. D. & Freeman, H. S. (2004). Acta Cryst. C60, o569–o571. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Frisch, M. J., Trucks, G. W., Schlegel, H. B., Scuseria, G. E., Robb, M. A., Cheeseman, J. R., Scalmani, G., Barone, V., Mennucci, B., Petersson, G. A., Nakatsuji, H., Caricato, M., Li, X., Hratchian, H. P., Izmaylov, A. F., Bloino, J., Zheng, G., Sonnenberg, J. L., Hada, M., Ehara, M., Toyota, K., Fukuda, R., Hasegawa, J., Ishida, M., Nakajima, T., Honda, Y., Kitao, O., Nakai, H., Vreven, T., Montgomery, J. J. A., Peralta, J. E., Ogliaro, F., Bearpark, M., Heyd, J. J., Brothers, E., Kudin, K. N., Staroverov, V. N., Kobayashi, R., Normand, J., Raghavachari, K., Rendell, A., Burant, J. C., Iyengar, S. S., Tomasi, J., Cossi, M., Rega, N., Millam, J. M., Klene, M., Knox, J. E., Cross, J. B., Bakken, V., Adamo, C., Jaramillo, J., Gomperts, R., Stratmann, R. E., Yazyev, O., Austin, A. J., Cammi, R., Pomelli, C., Ochterski, J. W., Martin, R. L., Morokuma, K., Zakrzewski, V. G., Voth, G. A., Salvador, P., Dannenberg, J. J., Dapprich, S., Daniels, A. D., Farkas, O., Foresman, J. B., Ortiz, J. V., Cioslowski, J. & Fox, D. J. (2009). Gaussian09. Gaussian Inc, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA. Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hmadeh, M., Traboulsi, H., Elhabiri, M., Braunstein, P., Albrecht-Gary, A. & Siri, O. (2008). Tetrahedron, 64, 6522–6529. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Hoser, A. A., Jarzembska, K. N., Dobrzycki, Ł., Łukasz, , Gutmann, M. J. & Woźniak, K. (2012). Cryst. Growth Des. 12, 3526–3539. Google Scholar
Kang, G., Jeon, Y., Lee, K. Y., Kim, J. & Kim, T. H. (2015). Cryst. Growth Des. 15, 5183–5187. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kayan, C., Biricik, N., Aydemir, M. & Scopelliti, R. (2012). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 385, 164–169. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Liu, L. F., Yulan, Z. & Qian, X. H. (2004). Dyes Pigments, 60, 17–21. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Nagaraja, V., Kumar, M. K. & Giddappa, N. (2017). Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 173, 407–417. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Satapathi, S. (2015). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 56, 22–34. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Subashini, A., Ramamurthi, K. & Stoeckli-Evans, H. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o1296–o1297. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Zhang, S. T., Wang, Z. J., Zhao, J. M., Zhan, Y. Q., Wu, Y., Zhou, Y. C., Ding, X. M. & Hou, X. Y. (2004). Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 2916–2918. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar