research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 74| Part 10| October 2018| Pages 1486-1490
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989018012781

Crystal structures of the solvent-free and ethanol disolvate forms of 4,4′-(diazenediyl)bis­(2,3,5,6-tetra­fluoro­benzoic acid) exemplifying self-stabilized azo­benzene cis-configurations

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg
Igor Elkin,a* Thierry Maris,b Patrice Hildgenc and Christopher J. Barretta

aDepartment of Chemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0B8, Canada, bDepartment of Chemistry, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3J7, Canada, and cFaculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 3J7, Canada
*Correspondence e-mail: igor.elkin@mail.mcgill.ca

Edited by M. Weil, Vienna University of Technology, Austria (Received 13 August 2018; accepted 10 September 2018; online 25 September 2018)

cis-4,4′-(Diazenediyl)bis(2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzoic acid), C14H2F8N2O4, and its ethanol disolvate, C14H2F8N2O4·2C2H5OH, represent new examples of self-stabilized cis-configured azo­benzenes obtained by a common crystallization procedure at room temperature under normal laboratory lighting conditions. The target structure constitutes of two 2,3,5,6-tetra­fluoro­benzoic acid residues linked to each other by a cis-configured azo group and was confirmed for two isolated specimens extracted from the same sample, corresponding to a solvent-free form and an ethanol disolvate. In the solvent-free form, the mol­ecule is characterized by rotational symmetry around a twofold rotation axis bis­ecting its central N=N bond while this symmetry is not present in the solvated form. The values of the inclination angles of the terminal carboxyl groups towards the corresponding benzene rings vary from 5.2 (4) to 45.7 (2)°, depending on the crystal composition. In the unsolvated form, the mol­ecules are linked through identical hydrogen bonds with a classical R22(8) graph-set ring motif of carb­oxy­lic acids, by generating supra­molecular chains running approximately parallel to [101]. The presence of ethanol in the solvated form also leads to changes in the short-contact pattern to produce both the R44(12) ring and open-chain motifs with alternating alcohol and di­carb­oxy­lic acid mol­ecules.

CCDC references: 1866891; 1866890

Similar articles

1. Chemical context

The parent structure of azo­benzene and its numerous differently substituted derivatives is comprised of two aromatic benzene rings separated by an azo group. One of the most intriguing properties of these artificial mol­ecules is their capability to shape reversibly the configuration of the azo group from the linear trans form, usually more stable, to the bent cis form, in the presence of an appropriate light irradiation, e.g. lasers or LEDs. Such controlled trans-cis inter­conversions at the mol­ecular scale, typically performed on the microsecond time inter­val or faster, have been amplified successfully to a macroscopic material photomechanical response, suggesting a highly promising route toward creating and applying diverse photoresponsive systems (Mahimwalla et al., 2012[Mahimwalla, Z., Yager, K. G., Mamiya, J. I., Shishido, A., Priimagi, A. & Barrett, C. J. (2012). Polym. Bull. 69, 967-1006.]; Bushuyev et al., 2018[Bushuyev, O. S., Aizawa, M., Shishido, A. & Barrett, C. J. (2018). Macromol. Rapid Commun. 39, 1700253.]). In this context, azo­benzenes, capable of adopting long-term stabilized cis-forms, represent an important tool for studying the trans–cis isomerization mechanisms, as well as for tuning the photomechanical properties. Particular attention has therefore been paid to polyfluorinated azo­benzene derivatives employed as components of various photoresponsive homo- and heteromolecular crystals (Bushuyev et al., 2013[Bushuyev, O. S., Tomberg, A., Friščić, T. & Barrett, C. J. (2013). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 12556-12559.], 2014[Bushuyev, O. S., Corkery, T. C., Barrett, C. J. & Friščić, T. (2014). Chem. Sci. 5, 3158-3164.], 2016a[Bushuyev, O. S., Friščić, T. & Barrett, C. J. (2016a). CrystEngComm, 18, 7204-7211.],b[Bushuyev, O. S., Friščić, T. & Barrett, C. J. (2016b). Cryst. Growth Des. 16, 541-545.]).

[Scheme 1]

In the present study, we report the crystal structures of 4,4′-(diazenediyl)bis(2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzoic acid) with (I)[link] and without residual ethanol (II)[link], both adopting the cis configuration during a common crystallization procedure from the same solution in ethanol at room temperature under normal laboratory lighting conditions.

2. Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound with (I)[link] and without residual ethanol solvent mol­ecules (II)[link], Figs. 1[link] and 2[link], respectively, is constituted of two 2,3,5,6-tetra­fluoro­benzoic acid residues linked to each other by a cis-configured azo group. In the solvent-free form (II)[link], the mol­ecule is characterized by rotational symmetry around a twofold rotation axis bis­ecting its central N=N bond while this symmetry is not present in the solvated form (I)[link].

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The mol­ecular structure of (I)[link] showing the atom labelling and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms are drawn as spheres of arbitrary radius, and hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
The mol­ecular structure of (II)[link] showing the atom labelling and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. H atoms are drawn as spheres of arbitrary radius. [Symmetry code: (i) −x + 1, y, −z + [{1\over 2}]].

In both types of crystal, the mol­ecular configurations are characterized by similar bond lengths and angles, which are in the expected ranges and are consistent with known data for cis-configured 2,3,5,6,2′,3′,5′,6′-octa­fluoro­azo­benzene moieties (Bushuyev et al., 2013[Bushuyev, O. S., Tomberg, A., Friščić, T. & Barrett, C. J. (2013). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 12556-12559.], 2014[Bushuyev, O. S., Corkery, T. C., Barrett, C. J. & Friščić, T. (2014). Chem. Sci. 5, 3158-3164.], 2016c[Bushuyev, O. S., Tomberg, A., Vinden, J. R., Moitessier, N., Barrett, C. J. & Friščić, T. (2016c). Chem. Commun. 52, 2103-2106.]). Depending on the type of crystal, the two carboxyl groups are inclined differently to the planes of the corresponding benzene rings to which they are attached. In the ethanol disolvate form (I)[link], the angles of inclination for groups O4—C14—O3 and O1—C7—O2 are 5.2 (4) and 45.7 (3)°, respectively, while in the solvent-free form (II)[link], the value for O1—C7—O2 is 40.4 (3)°. The torsion angles between the central N=N bond and the two attached benzene C atoms are nearly the same in the two mol­ecules, viz. −9.8 (9)° for C1—N1=N2—C8 in (I)[link], and −9.4 (4)° for C1—N1=N1i—C1i [i) −x + 1, y, −z + [{1\over 2}]] in (II)[link].

3. Supra­molecular features

The inclusion of ethanol mol­ecules in the crystal composition renders different the patterns of inter­actions through hydrogen bonds for the forms (I)[link] and (II)[link] (Tables 1[link] and 2[link], respectively). For the solvated structure (I)[link], the hydrogen bonds between the alternating hy­droxy groups of residual ethanol and the carboxyl groups of the title mol­ecule are arranged in two different ways, by forming either 12-membered rings involving four mol­ecules (two mol­ecules of each component), according to graph-set descriptor R44(12) (Etter et al., 1990[Etter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256-262.]), or an open-chain pattern extending parallel to [100] (Fig. 3[link]). As a result of such a configuration of short contacts, the whole supra­molecular scaffold is stabilized by mol­ecules belonging to adjacent parallel (011) layers stacked along [100]. For the unsolvated structure (II)[link], the mol­ecules are organized in (10[\overline{1}]) layers composed of identical corrugated chains running along [101]. In this case, the supra­molecular integrity is maintained primarily by the classical R22(8) ring motif of hydrogen bonds between the closest carboxyl groups (Fig. 4[link]). A very similar motif was also observed in a solvent-free crystal of another 4,4′-dicarboxyl-substituted azo­benzene, i.e. trans-4,4′-(diazenediyl)di­­benzoic acid (Yu & Liu, 2009[Yu, Q.-D. & Liu, Y.-Y. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o2326.]).

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (I)[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O5 0.84 1.72 2.556 (5) 171.9
O4—H4⋯O6 0.84 1.74 2.579 (7) 175.7
O6—H6⋯O3i 0.84 1.93 2.751 (7) 164
O5—H5⋯O2ii 0.84 1.93 2.771 (6) 175.2
Symmetry codes: (i) -x, -y+1, -z+1; (ii) x-1, y, z.

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for (II)[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯O1i 0.90 (5) 1.71 (5) 2.607 (2) 173 (5)
Symmetry code: (i) [-x+{\script{3\over 2}}, -y+{\script{1\over 2}}, -z+1].
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Partial view of the packing of (I)[link], showing the hydrogen-bonding inter­actions (dotted lines). Hanging hydrogen bonds were omitted for clarity.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Partial view of the packing showing two hydrogen-bonded chains in (II)[link]. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dotted lines and hanging hydrogen bonds were omitted for clarity.

4. Database Survey

A search in the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.39 with one update; Groom et al., 2016[Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171-179.]) returned 32 entries for different 4,4′-(diazenediyl)bis(2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzoic acid) derivatives and their co-crystals with other compounds. This includes the crystal characterization of pure trans-2,3,5,6,2′,3′,5′,6′-octa­fluoro­azinodi­benzene (Saccone et al., 2014[Saccone, M., Terraneo, G., Pilati, T., Cavallo, G., Priimagi, A., Metrangolo, P. & Resnati, G. (2014). Acta Cryst. B70, 149-156.]), cis- (Bushuyev et al., 2016c[Bushuyev, O. S., Tomberg, A., Vinden, J. R., Moitessier, N., Barrett, C. J. & Friščić, T. (2016c). Chem. Commun. 52, 2103-2106.]) and trans-2,3,4,5,6,2′,3′,4′,5′,6′-deca­fluoro­azo­benzene (Chinnakali et al., 1993[Chinnakali, K., Fun, H.-K., Shawkataly, O. B. & Teoh, S.-G. (1993). Acta Cryst. C49, 615-616.]; Bushuyev et al., 2016c[Bushuyev, O. S., Tomberg, A., Vinden, J. R., Moitessier, N., Barrett, C. J. & Friščić, T. (2016c). Chem. Commun. 52, 2103-2106.]), as well as of co-crystals of the latter with trans-stilbene (Bruce et al., 1987[Bruce, M. I., Snow, M. R. & Tiekink, E. R. T. (1987). Acta Cryst. C43, 1640-1641.]) and trans-azomesitylene (Bruce & Tiekink, 1989[Bruce, M. I. & Tiekink, E. R. T. (1989). Aust. J. Chem. 42, 741-745.]). The structures of other entries found by the search are also limited to the 4,4′-dihalide derivatives, i.e. to 4,4′-di­bromo- and 4,4′-di­iodo- ones, in their cis and trans configurations (Bushuyev et al., 2013[Bushuyev, O. S., Tomberg, A., Friščić, T. & Barrett, C. J. (2013). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 12556-12559.]), as well as to their co-crystals with cis- and trans-1,2- bis­(4-pyrid­yl)ethyl­ene and trans-4,4′-azo­pyridine (Bushuyev et al., 2014[Bushuyev, O. S., Corkery, T. C., Barrett, C. J. & Friščić, T. (2014). Chem. Sci. 5, 3158-3164.]), with 4,4′-bi­pyridine, 4-methoxyl-4′-stilbazole and di­methyl­sulfoxide (Saccone et al., 2014[Saccone, M., Terraneo, G., Pilati, T., Cavallo, G., Priimagi, A., Metrangolo, P. & Resnati, G. (2014). Acta Cryst. B70, 149-156.]), with 1,4-di­aza­bicyclo­[2.2.2]octane, di­thiane, 4-vinyl­pyridine (Bushuyev et al., 2016c[Bushuyev, O. S., Tomberg, A., Vinden, J. R., Moitessier, N., Barrett, C. J. & Friščić, T. (2016c). Chem. Commun. 52, 2103-2106.]) and with trans-4,4′-di­cyano­azo­benzene, trans-4,4′-di­nitro­azo­benzene, trans-4,4′-azo­pyridine, 4-cyano-4′-pentyl­biphenyl and 1,10-phenanthroline (Bushuyev et al., 2016b[Bushuyev, O. S., Friščić, T. & Barrett, C. J. (2016b). Cryst. Growth Des. 16, 541-545.]).

5. Synthesis and crystallization

The title compound was synthesized according to a modified general protocol for obtaining symmetrically substituted azo­benzenes from the corresponding initial anilines (Clarke, 1971[Clarke, H. T. (1971). J. Org. Chem. 36, 3816-3819.]). Briefly, 3 g (0.014 mol) of 4-amino-2,3,5,6-tetra­fluoro­benzoic acid was neutralized in 60 ml of water by NaOH solution and adjusted to pH ≃ 8.5–9.0, and added dropwise to 100 ml of the commercial bleach solution CloroxTM (The Clorox Company of Canada Ltd., ON, Canada), preliminary cooled to 273–278 K in an ice bath. The mixture was allowed to reach room temperature with overnight stirring. The resulting red-coloured solution was first treated with 80 ml of acetone and stirred for 1 h, to neutralize the excess of NaOCl, and then with aqueous HCl to pH 1.0 to give a pink sediment. After filtering and drying overnight at room temperature, the solid crude product was purified by extraction with ethanol followed by filtering. The final removal of solvent under reduced pressure gave 1.2 g of the target product with the yield of 40.4%. The structure and purity of the desired product were confirmed by LC–MS analysis performed on an Agilent Technologies 1260 Infinity LC–MS spectrometer (Santa Clara, CA, US) in ESI positive and negative modes. Separation was performed with an Agilent Poroshell 120 EC–C18 2.7 mm column, using as eluent the 0–100% gradient of solvent mixtures A and B [where A: water–aceto­nitrile (95%vol–5%vol) and acetic acid (0.1%vol); B: aceto­nitrile (99.9%vol) and acetic acid (0.1%vol)] under the following conditions: a capillary voltage of ESI source of 3000 V; a vaporizer temperature of 442 K, a nebulization pressure of 55 psig, a dry gas temperature of 571 K and a gas flow of 5 l min−1. Crystals of the title compound were obtained by vapor diffusion at room temperature using an ethanol solution in a small open vial placed in a sealed larger vessel filled with hexane. The ethanol solvate crystals were in the form of small yellow platelets while the unsolvated form crystallized as large orange plates.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3[link]. The H atoms of the hy­droxy and carboxyl groups in (I)[link] were first positioned from Fourier synthesis and refined leveraging a riding model with Uiso(H) set to 1.5 times Ueq(O). All other H atoms of (I)[link] were treated by using appropriate constraints. For (II)[link], all the H atoms, including those belonging to the carboxyl group, were positioned from the difference synthesis and fully refined. For (I)[link], non-merohedral twinning was found using the TwinRotMat Routine in PLATON (Spek, 2009[Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148-155.]). The twin law matrix was found to be (1 0 0, −0.621 − 1 0, −0.951 0 − 1). Processing the data as a two-component specimen with SAINT (Bruker, 2013[Bruker (2013). APEX2, SAINT and TWINABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) and TWINABS (Bruker, 2013[Bruker (2013). APEX2, SAINT and TWINABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]) did not lead to an improvement in the refinement. Therefore, the initial data set was kept with the refinement performed using the HKLF5 file as generated with PLATON. The final BASF parameter indication the ratio of the two crystal domains was 0.646 (10).

Table 3
Experimental details

  (I) (II)
Crystal data
Chemical formula C14H2F8N2O4·2C2H6O C14H2F8N2O4
Mr 506.31 414.18
Crystal system, space group Triclinic, P[\overline{1}] Monoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K) 150 150
a, b, c (Å) 5.8188 (9), 10.4579 (16), 17.468 (3) 21.7297 (16), 6.5797 (5), 10.2247 (8)
α, β, γ (°) 99.186 (8), 99.112 (8), 99.950 (8) 90, 100.058 (4), 90
V (Å3) 1014.5 (3) 1439.41 (19)
Z 2 4
Radiation type Ga Kα, λ = 1.34139 Å Ga Kα, λ = 1.34139 Å
μ (mm−1) 0.98 1.21
Crystal size (mm) 0.25 × 0.08 × 0.03 0.15 × 0.08 × 0.04
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker Venture Metaljet Bruker Venture Metaljet
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015[Krause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3-10.]) Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015[Krause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3-10.])
Tmin, Tmax 0.549, 0.751 0.547, 0.752
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 18534, 18534, 13265 9647, 1656, 1339
Rint – 0.052
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) 0.614 0.650
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.093, 0.288, 1.07 0.057, 0.171, 1.06
No. of reflections 18534 1656
No. of parameters 312 132
H-atom treatment H-atom parameters constrained All H-atom parameters refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.49, −0.41 0.25, −0.31
Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2013[Bruker (2013). APEX2, SAINT and TWINABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3-8.]), SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3-8.]), OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009[Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339-341.]), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008[Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466-470.]) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010[Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.]).

Supporting information

CCDC references: 1866891; 1866890

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, II, global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989018012781/wm5460sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989018012781/wm5460Isup2.hkl

Structure factors: contains datablock II. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989018012781/wm5460IIsup3.hkl

checkCIF report


Computing details top

For both structures, data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2013); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2013); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2013); program(s) used to solve structure: ShelXT (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

cis-2,3,5,6,2',3',5',6'-Octafluoro-4,4'-azinodibenzoic acid ethanol disolvate (I) top
Crystal data top
C14H2F8N2O4·2C2H6OZ = 2
Mr = 506.31F(000) = 512
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.658 Mg m−3
a = 5.8188 (9) ÅGa Kα radiation, λ = 1.34139 Å
b = 10.4579 (16) ÅCell parameters from 9922 reflections
c = 17.468 (3) Åθ = 2.3–55.1°
α = 99.186 (8)°µ = 0.98 mm−1
β = 99.112 (8)°T = 150 K
γ = 99.950 (8)°Platelet, clear light yellow
V = 1014.5 (3) Å30.25 × 0.08 × 0.03 mm
Data collection top
Bruker Venture Metaljet
diffractometer		18534 measured reflections
Radiation source: Metal Jet, Gallium Liquid Metal Jet Source18534 independent reflections
Helios MX Mirror Optics monochromator13265 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 10.24 pixels mm-1θmax = 55.4°, θmin = 2.3°
ω and φ scansh = −7→7
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)		k = −12→12
Tmin = 0.549, Tmax = 0.751l = −21→21
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.093 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1107P)2 + 2.0727P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.288(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.07Δρmax = 0.49 e Å−3
18534 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.41 e Å−3
312 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL-2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.012 (3)
Primary atom site location: dual
Special details top

Experimental. X-ray crystallographic data for I were collected from a single crystal sample, which was mounted on a loop fiber. Data were collected using a Bruker Venture diffractometer equipped with a Photon 100 CMOS Detector, a Helios MX optics and a Kappa goniometer. The crystal-to-detector distance was 4.0 cm, and the data collection was carried out in 1024 x 1024 pixel mode.

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refined as a 2-component twin.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.9889 (11)0.7393 (6)0.2014 (3)0.0597 (15)
N11.1558 (10)0.6593 (6)0.2222 (3)0.0672 (14)
O10.3501 (7)0.9771 (4)0.1079 (2)0.0653 (11)
H10.2808641.0280280.0845010.098*
O20.6726 (7)1.0908 (4)0.0774 (2)0.0618 (11)
F21.2702 (6)0.9263 (4)0.2709 (2)0.0770 (11)
C21.0604 (10)0.8764 (6)0.2215 (3)0.0584 (15)
N21.1060 (10)0.5642 (6)0.2555 (3)0.0687 (14)
C30.9249 (11)0.9584 (6)0.1927 (3)0.0595 (15)
F31.0065 (7)1.0886 (3)0.2150 (2)0.0708 (10)
O30.2387 (10)0.5170 (5)0.4479 (3)0.0861 (14)
O40.2042 (10)0.3099 (5)0.3888 (3)0.0897 (15)
H40.0834810.2992820.4096500.135*
C40.7100 (10)0.9097 (6)0.1410 (3)0.0546 (14)
F50.4289 (6)0.7189 (3)0.0718 (2)0.0708 (10)
C50.6371 (10)0.7738 (6)0.1226 (3)0.0563 (14)
F60.6944 (7)0.5586 (3)0.1279 (2)0.0705 (10)
C60.7702 (11)0.6899 (6)0.1508 (3)0.0589 (15)
C70.5754 (11)1.0025 (6)0.1050 (3)0.0565 (14)
C80.8909 (11)0.5411 (6)0.2860 (3)0.0605 (15)
F90.9583 (7)0.7550 (3)0.3629 (2)0.0771 (11)
C90.8279 (12)0.6306 (6)0.3424 (3)0.0617 (15)
C100.6437 (12)0.5963 (6)0.3793 (3)0.0618 (15)
F100.5974 (8)0.6915 (4)0.4324 (2)0.0811 (11)
C110.5087 (11)0.4687 (6)0.3642 (3)0.0590 (15)
F120.4592 (7)0.2513 (4)0.2879 (2)0.0802 (11)
C120.5750 (12)0.3767 (6)0.3080 (3)0.0636 (16)
C130.7577 (12)0.4126 (6)0.2712 (3)0.0626 (16)
F130.8152 (8)0.3206 (4)0.2172 (2)0.0811 (11)
C140.3069 (12)0.4362 (7)0.4047 (4)0.0656 (17)
O6−0.1599 (10)0.2670 (5)0.4551 (3)0.0852 (14)
H6−0.2123340.3261890.4813830.128*
C17−0.3034 (15)0.1409 (7)0.4531 (4)0.084 (2)
H17A−0.4722050.1414290.4331630.100*
H17B−0.2892540.1215750.5071620.100*
C18−0.2239 (17)0.0366 (8)0.4004 (6)0.104 (3)
H18A−0.2225990.0609040.3485110.156*
H18B−0.333646−0.0483930.3942200.156*
H18C−0.0635610.0289250.4238320.156*
O50.1322 (7)1.1419 (4)0.0494 (2)0.0656 (11)
H5−0.0086591.1222550.0559180.098*
C150.2311 (12)1.2757 (6)0.0863 (4)0.0688 (17)
H15A0.3983411.2976790.0797160.083*
H15B0.2304951.2862430.1436290.083*
C160.0966 (13)1.3697 (7)0.0526 (4)0.0741 (18)
H16A0.0961711.359388−0.0041530.111*
H16B0.1728031.4606240.0787850.111*
H16C−0.0673091.3508660.0611550.111*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.063 (4)0.066 (4)0.050 (3)0.020 (3)0.007 (3)0.009 (3)
N10.071 (3)0.072 (4)0.063 (3)0.028 (3)0.008 (3)0.013 (3)
O10.058 (3)0.069 (3)0.073 (3)0.017 (2)0.013 (2)0.018 (2)
O20.066 (3)0.058 (3)0.058 (2)0.015 (2)0.0071 (19)0.0044 (19)
F20.066 (2)0.079 (2)0.075 (2)0.0081 (18)−0.0105 (18)0.0125 (19)
C20.053 (3)0.064 (4)0.053 (3)0.006 (3)0.002 (3)0.009 (3)
N20.078 (4)0.070 (3)0.061 (3)0.027 (3)0.010 (3)0.010 (3)
C30.072 (4)0.049 (3)0.051 (3)0.009 (3)0.006 (3)0.002 (3)
F30.079 (2)0.057 (2)0.066 (2)0.0060 (17)−0.0002 (17)0.0014 (16)
O30.095 (4)0.078 (3)0.078 (3)0.014 (3)0.025 (3)−0.011 (3)
O40.106 (4)0.064 (3)0.096 (3)0.008 (3)0.033 (3)0.004 (3)
C40.057 (3)0.060 (4)0.044 (3)0.012 (3)0.009 (2)0.006 (3)
F50.069 (2)0.063 (2)0.068 (2)0.0076 (16)−0.0095 (17)0.0061 (17)
C50.056 (3)0.062 (4)0.043 (3)0.008 (3)0.002 (2)−0.001 (3)
F60.087 (3)0.055 (2)0.062 (2)0.0166 (17)0.0014 (18)0.0017 (16)
C60.072 (4)0.051 (3)0.049 (3)0.012 (3)0.004 (3)0.002 (3)
C70.064 (4)0.055 (4)0.048 (3)0.015 (3)0.010 (3)0.000 (3)
C80.072 (4)0.064 (4)0.048 (3)0.026 (3)0.008 (3)0.010 (3)
F90.100 (3)0.059 (2)0.063 (2)0.0061 (19)0.0128 (19)0.0005 (17)
C90.077 (4)0.052 (4)0.051 (3)0.013 (3)0.002 (3)0.004 (3)
C100.076 (4)0.059 (4)0.047 (3)0.022 (3)0.003 (3)0.001 (3)
F100.106 (3)0.062 (2)0.073 (2)0.018 (2)0.023 (2)−0.0041 (18)
C110.069 (4)0.060 (4)0.045 (3)0.019 (3)0.000 (3)0.004 (3)
F120.100 (3)0.062 (2)0.067 (2)0.007 (2)0.012 (2)−0.0072 (17)
C120.079 (4)0.052 (4)0.050 (3)0.015 (3)−0.005 (3)−0.001 (3)
C130.080 (4)0.060 (4)0.045 (3)0.025 (3)0.001 (3)−0.001 (3)
F130.104 (3)0.066 (2)0.071 (2)0.023 (2)0.022 (2)−0.0042 (18)
C140.074 (4)0.068 (4)0.049 (3)0.016 (3)−0.005 (3)0.009 (3)
O60.098 (4)0.061 (3)0.095 (4)0.017 (3)0.022 (3)0.007 (3)
C170.100 (6)0.071 (5)0.075 (4)0.022 (4)0.011 (4)0.004 (4)
C180.111 (7)0.074 (5)0.119 (7)0.022 (5)0.023 (5)−0.008 (5)
O50.063 (3)0.061 (3)0.070 (3)0.0148 (19)0.007 (2)0.005 (2)
C150.065 (4)0.068 (4)0.068 (4)0.009 (3)0.004 (3)0.007 (3)
C160.086 (5)0.069 (4)0.069 (4)0.019 (4)0.015 (4)0.015 (3)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—N11.429 (8)C10—F101.341 (7)
C1—C21.393 (8)C10—C111.388 (9)
C1—C61.392 (8)C11—C121.409 (9)
N1—N21.244 (7)C11—C141.482 (9)
O1—H10.8400F12—C121.331 (7)
O1—C71.303 (7)C12—C131.356 (9)
O2—C71.206 (7)C13—F131.359 (7)
F2—C21.345 (6)O6—H60.8400
C2—C31.363 (8)O6—C171.425 (9)
N2—C81.434 (8)C17—H17A0.9900
C3—F31.334 (6)C17—H17B0.9900
C3—C41.383 (8)C17—C181.498 (11)
O3—C141.203 (8)C18—H18A0.9800
O4—H40.8400C18—H18B0.9800
O4—C141.318 (8)C18—H18C0.9800
C4—C51.380 (8)O5—H50.8400
C4—C71.500 (8)O5—C151.422 (7)
F5—C51.356 (6)C15—H15A0.9900
C5—C61.366 (8)C15—H15B0.9900
F6—C61.342 (7)C15—C161.493 (9)
C8—C91.386 (8)C16—H16A0.9800
C8—C131.393 (9)C16—H16B0.9800
F9—C91.349 (7)C16—H16C0.9800
C9—C101.361 (9)
C2—C1—N1118.9 (5)C12—C11—C14123.9 (6)
C6—C1—N1123.7 (6)F12—C12—C11121.5 (6)
C6—C1—C2116.6 (5)F12—C12—C13117.1 (6)
N2—N1—C1122.3 (5)C13—C12—C11121.5 (6)
C7—O1—H1109.5C12—C13—C8122.8 (6)
F2—C2—C1117.6 (5)C12—C13—F13119.5 (6)
F2—C2—C3120.5 (5)F13—C13—C8117.8 (6)
C3—C2—C1121.9 (5)O3—C14—O4122.1 (7)
N1—N2—C8121.5 (5)O3—C14—C11123.8 (6)
C2—C3—C4121.7 (5)O4—C14—C11114.2 (6)
F3—C3—C2118.0 (5)C17—O6—H6109.5
F3—C3—C4120.3 (5)O6—C17—H17A109.8
C14—O4—H4109.5O6—C17—H17B109.8
C3—C4—C7120.2 (5)O6—C17—C18109.5 (7)
C5—C4—C3116.3 (5)H17A—C17—H17B108.2
C5—C4—C7123.4 (5)C18—C17—H17A109.8
F5—C5—C4119.5 (5)C18—C17—H17B109.8
F5—C5—C6117.5 (5)C17—C18—H18A109.5
C6—C5—C4122.9 (5)C17—C18—H18B109.5
C5—C6—C1120.6 (5)C17—C18—H18C109.5
F6—C6—C1119.3 (5)H18A—C18—H18B109.5
F6—C6—C5120.1 (5)H18A—C18—H18C109.5
O1—C7—C4113.0 (5)H18B—C18—H18C109.5
O2—C7—O1125.3 (5)C15—O5—H5109.5
O2—C7—C4121.7 (6)O5—C15—H15A109.2
C9—C8—N2124.6 (6)O5—C15—H15B109.2
C9—C8—C13115.6 (6)O5—C15—C16112.2 (5)
C13—C8—N2118.5 (6)H15A—C15—H15B107.9
F9—C9—C8118.7 (6)C16—C15—H15A109.2
F9—C9—C10119.0 (6)C16—C15—H15B109.2
C10—C9—C8122.3 (6)C15—C16—H16A109.5
C9—C10—C11122.4 (6)C15—C16—H16B109.5
F10—C10—C9117.1 (6)C15—C16—H16C109.5
F10—C10—C11120.5 (6)H16A—C16—H16B109.5
C10—C11—C12115.5 (6)H16A—C16—H16C109.5
C10—C11—C14120.6 (6)H16B—C16—H16C109.5
C1—N1—N2—C8−9.8 (9)C5—C4—C7—O2−130.9 (6)
C1—C2—C3—F3180.0 (5)C6—C1—N1—N2−59.3 (8)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.9 (9)C6—C1—C2—F2179.4 (5)
N1—C1—C2—F2−10.8 (8)C6—C1—C2—C3−0.7 (9)
N1—C1—C2—C3169.2 (5)C7—C4—C5—F5−2.6 (8)
N1—C1—C6—C5−168.7 (5)C7—C4—C5—C6174.7 (5)
N1—C1—C6—F69.2 (9)C8—C9—C10—F10−179.3 (5)
N1—N2—C8—C9−58.6 (8)C8—C9—C10—C111.3 (9)
N1—N2—C8—C13135.3 (6)F9—C9—C10—F102.5 (8)
F2—C2—C3—F3−0.1 (8)F9—C9—C10—C11−176.8 (5)
F2—C2—C3—C4179.1 (5)C9—C8—C13—C121.3 (8)
C2—C1—N1—N2131.6 (6)C9—C8—C13—F13−178.9 (5)
C2—C1—C6—C50.7 (9)C9—C10—C11—C120.0 (8)
C2—C1—C6—F6178.5 (5)C9—C10—C11—C14−178.9 (5)
C2—C3—C4—C52.3 (8)C10—C11—C12—F12−179.6 (5)
C2—C3—C4—C7−174.8 (5)C10—C11—C12—C13−0.5 (8)
N2—C8—C9—F99.7 (8)C10—C11—C14—O35.0 (9)
N2—C8—C9—C10−168.4 (5)C10—C11—C14—O4−175.8 (5)
N2—C8—C13—C12168.7 (5)F10—C10—C11—C12−179.4 (5)
N2—C8—C13—F13−11.5 (8)F10—C10—C11—C141.7 (8)
C3—C4—C5—F5−179.6 (5)C11—C12—C13—C8−0.1 (9)
C3—C4—C5—C6−2.3 (8)C11—C12—C13—F13−179.9 (5)
C3—C4—C7—O1−133.7 (6)F12—C12—C13—C8179.0 (5)
C3—C4—C7—O245.9 (8)F12—C12—C13—F13−0.8 (8)
F3—C3—C4—C5−178.6 (5)C12—C11—C14—O3−173.8 (6)
F3—C3—C4—C74.4 (8)C12—C11—C14—O45.4 (8)
C4—C5—C6—C10.8 (9)C13—C8—C9—F9176.3 (5)
C4—C5—C6—F6−177.0 (5)C13—C8—C9—C10−1.9 (8)
F5—C5—C6—C1178.2 (5)C14—C11—C12—F12−0.8 (8)
F5—C5—C6—F60.4 (8)C14—C11—C12—C13178.3 (5)
C5—C4—C7—O149.5 (7)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O50.841.722.556 (5)171.9
O4—H4···O60.841.742.579 (7)175.7
O6—H6···O3i0.841.932.751 (7)164
O5—H5···O2ii0.841.932.771 (6)175.2
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) x−1, y, z.
cis-2,3,5,6,2',3',5',6'-Octafluoro-4,4'-azinodibenzoic acid (II) top
Crystal data top
C14H2F8N2O4F(000) = 816
Mr = 414.18Dx = 1.911 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, C2/cGa Kα radiation, λ = 1.34139 Å
a = 21.7297 (16) ÅCell parameters from 6326 reflections
b = 6.5797 (5) Åθ = 3.6–60.6°
c = 10.2247 (8) ŵ = 1.21 mm−1
β = 100.058 (4)°T = 150 K
V = 1439.41 (19) Å3Plate, clear light orange
Z = 40.15 × 0.08 × 0.04 mm
Data collection top
Bruker Venture Metaljet
diffractometer		1656 independent reflections
Radiation source: Metal Jet, Gallium Liquid Metal Jet Source1339 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Helios MX Mirror Optics monochromatorRint = 0.052
Detector resolution: 10.24 pixels mm-1θmax = 60.7°, θmin = 3.6°
ω and φ scansh = −28→27
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)		k = −8→8
Tmin = 0.547, Tmax = 0.752l = −13→13
9647 measured reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullAll H-atom parameters refined
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.057 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0917P)2 + 1.5671P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.171(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.06Δρmax = 0.25 e Å−3
1656 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.31 e Å−3
132 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL-2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
0 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.0040 (7)
Primary atom site location: dual
Special details top

Experimental. X-ray crystallographic data for I were collected from a single crystal sample, which was mounted on a loop fiber. Data were collected using a Bruker Venture diffractometer equipped with a Photon 100 CMOS Detector, a Helios MX optics and a Kappa goniometer. The crystal-to-detector distance was 4.0 cm, and the data collection was carried out in 1024 x 1024 pixel mode.

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.52881 (9)1.1272 (3)0.2701 (2)0.0493 (5)
C10.56365 (10)0.9427 (4)0.3044 (2)0.0451 (5)
O10.74933 (8)0.5029 (3)0.46997 (18)0.0550 (5)
C20.62039 (10)0.9234 (4)0.2592 (2)0.0466 (6)
F20.63497 (7)1.0570 (3)0.17121 (15)0.0598 (5)
O20.66949 (9)0.2838 (3)0.4540 (2)0.0601 (5)
H20.699 (2)0.185 (8)0.473 (5)0.142 (19)*
F30.71428 (7)0.7543 (2)0.25407 (15)0.0604 (5)
C30.66112 (10)0.7681 (4)0.3031 (2)0.0486 (6)
C40.64750 (10)0.6250 (4)0.3932 (2)0.0460 (6)
C50.59134 (11)0.6440 (4)0.4392 (2)0.0464 (5)
F50.57659 (7)0.5188 (2)0.53098 (15)0.0570 (5)
C60.54993 (10)0.8009 (4)0.3945 (2)0.0457 (5)
F60.49705 (6)0.8153 (2)0.44498 (14)0.0529 (4)
C70.69243 (11)0.4589 (4)0.4432 (2)0.0470 (6)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0456 (10)0.0508 (11)0.0466 (10)0.0015 (8)−0.0054 (7)0.0028 (8)
C10.0405 (11)0.0486 (12)0.0413 (11)−0.0022 (9)−0.0065 (8)0.0003 (9)
O10.0393 (9)0.0583 (11)0.0618 (10)0.0015 (7)−0.0067 (7)−0.0017 (8)
C20.0407 (11)0.0533 (13)0.0420 (11)−0.0028 (9)−0.0037 (8)0.0051 (9)
F20.0521 (9)0.0680 (10)0.0569 (8)0.0016 (7)0.0033 (6)0.0198 (7)
O20.0508 (10)0.0501 (10)0.0702 (12)0.0000 (8)−0.0153 (8)0.0050 (8)
F30.0455 (8)0.0788 (11)0.0558 (9)0.0081 (7)0.0056 (6)0.0135 (7)
C30.0393 (11)0.0591 (14)0.0437 (11)−0.0006 (10)−0.0033 (9)0.0015 (10)
C40.0385 (11)0.0486 (12)0.0451 (12)−0.0008 (9)−0.0083 (8)0.0011 (9)
C50.0454 (12)0.0490 (13)0.0408 (11)−0.0039 (9)−0.0039 (8)0.0024 (9)
F50.0520 (8)0.0581 (9)0.0588 (9)−0.0001 (6)0.0035 (6)0.0141 (7)
C60.0371 (11)0.0526 (12)0.0440 (11)−0.0033 (9)−0.0026 (8)−0.0010 (9)
F60.0449 (8)0.0576 (9)0.0545 (8)0.0010 (6)0.0044 (6)0.0041 (6)
C70.0429 (12)0.0527 (13)0.0412 (11)0.0026 (9)−0.0048 (8)−0.0014 (9)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—N1i1.248 (4)O2—C71.268 (3)
N1—C11.441 (3)F3—C31.340 (3)
C1—C21.396 (3)C3—C41.385 (3)
C1—C61.380 (3)C4—C51.388 (3)
O1—C71.253 (3)C4—C71.495 (3)
C2—F21.335 (3)C5—F51.329 (3)
C2—C31.374 (3)C5—C61.393 (3)
O2—H20.90 (5)C6—F61.343 (3)
N1i—N1—C1122.30 (12)C3—C4—C7121.4 (2)
C2—C1—N1117.0 (2)C5—C4—C7120.7 (2)
C6—C1—N1124.5 (2)C4—C5—C6120.8 (2)
C6—C1—C2117.7 (2)F5—C5—C4121.2 (2)
F2—C2—C1119.3 (2)F5—C5—C6118.0 (2)
F2—C2—C3119.6 (2)C1—C6—C5121.2 (2)
C3—C2—C1121.0 (2)F6—C6—C1120.5 (2)
C7—O2—H2114 (3)F6—C6—C5118.2 (2)
C2—C3—C4121.5 (2)O1—C7—O2125.4 (2)
F3—C3—C2118.4 (2)O1—C7—C4117.8 (2)
F3—C3—C4120.1 (2)O2—C7—C4116.8 (2)
C3—C4—C5117.8 (2)
N1i—N1—C1—C2136.0 (3)F3—C3—C4—C73.1 (3)
N1i—N1—C1—C6−54.6 (4)C3—C4—C5—F5−176.40 (19)
N1—C1—C2—F2−10.4 (3)C3—C4—C5—C60.8 (3)
N1—C1—C2—C3170.2 (2)C3—C4—C7—O140.6 (3)
N1—C1—C6—C5−169.2 (2)C3—C4—C7—O2−138.9 (2)
N1—C1—C6—F68.4 (3)C4—C5—C6—C1−0.6 (3)
C1—C2—C3—F3178.5 (2)C4—C5—C6—F6−178.21 (19)
C1—C2—C3—C40.2 (4)C5—C4—C7—O1−137.4 (2)
C2—C1—C6—C50.1 (3)C5—C4—C7—O243.1 (3)
C2—C1—C6—F6177.73 (19)F5—C5—C6—C1176.7 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.6 (3)F5—C5—C6—F6−1.0 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C7−178.6 (2)C6—C1—C2—F2179.49 (19)
F2—C2—C3—F3−1.0 (3)C6—C1—C2—C30.1 (3)
F2—C2—C3—C4−179.3 (2)C7—C4—C5—F51.7 (3)
F3—C3—C4—C5−178.8 (2)C7—C4—C5—C6178.8 (2)
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, y, −z+1/2.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···O1ii0.90 (5)1.71 (5)2.607 (2)173 (5)
Symmetry code: (ii) −x+3/2, −y+1/2, −z+1.
 

Funding information

Funding for this research was provided by: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec – Nature et Technologies.

References

First citationBruce, M. I., Snow, M. R. & Tiekink, E. R. T. (1987). Acta Cryst. C43, 1640–1641.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationBruce, M. I. & Tiekink, E. R. T. (1989). Aust. J. Chem. 42, 741–745.  CrossRef Google Scholar
 First citationBruker (2013). APEX2, SAINT and TWINABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
 First citationBushuyev, O. S., Aizawa, M., Shishido, A. & Barrett, C. J. (2018). Macromol. Rapid Commun. 39, 1700253.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
 First citationBushuyev, O. S., Corkery, T. C., Barrett, C. J. & Friščić, T. (2014). Chem. Sci. 5, 3158–3164.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationBushuyev, O. S., Friščić, T. & Barrett, C. J. (2016a). CrystEngComm, 18, 7204–7211.  CrossRef Google Scholar
 First citationBushuyev, O. S., Friščić, T. & Barrett, C. J. (2016b). Cryst. Growth Des. 16, 541–545.  CrossRef Google Scholar
 First citationBushuyev, O. S., Tomberg, A., Friščić, T. & Barrett, C. J. (2013). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 12556–12559.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
 First citationBushuyev, O. S., Tomberg, A., Vinden, J. R., Moitessier, N., Barrett, C. J. & Friščić, T. (2016c). Chem. Commun. 52, 2103–2106.  CrossRef Google Scholar
 First citationChinnakali, K., Fun, H.-K., Shawkataly, O. B. & Teoh, S.-G. (1993). Acta Cryst. C49, 615–616.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationClarke, H. T. (1971). J. Org. Chem. 36, 3816–3819.  CrossRef Google Scholar
 First citationDolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationEtter, M. C., MacDonald, J. C. & Bernstein, J. (1990). Acta Cryst. B46, 256–262.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationGroom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationKrause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationMacrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationMahimwalla, Z., Yager, K. G., Mamiya, J. I., Shishido, A., Priimagi, A. & Barrett, C. J. (2012). Polym. Bull. 69, 967–1006.  CrossRef Google Scholar
 First citationSaccone, M., Terraneo, G., Pilati, T., Cavallo, G., Priimagi, A., Metrangolo, P. & Resnati, G. (2014). Acta Cryst. B70, 149–156.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationSpek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationYu, Q.-D. & Liu, Y.-Y. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o2326.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 74| Part 10| October 2018| Pages 1486-1490
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989018012781
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS