research communications
4)2, from laboratory powder X-ray diffraction data
of strontium perchlorate anhydrate, Sr(ClOaDaegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Daegu 42988, Republic of Korea
*Correspondence e-mail: st.hong@dgist.ac.kr
The 4)2, was determined and refined from laboratory powder X-ray diffraction data. The material was obtained by dehydration of Sr(ClO4)2·3H2O at 523 K for two weeks. It crystallizes in the orthorhombic Pbca and is isotypic with Ca(AlD4)2 and Ca(ClO4)2. The contains one Sr, two Cl and eight O sites, all on general positions (Wyckoff position 8c). The consists of Sr2+ cations and isolated ClO4− tetrahedra. The Sr2+ cation is coordinated by eight O atoms from eight ClO4− tetrahedra. The validity of the model for Sr(ClO4)2 anhydrate was confirmed by the bond valence method.
of strontium perchlorate anhydrate, Sr(ClOCCDC reference: 1901870
1. Chemical context
The alkaline earth metal ions (Mg2+, Ca2+, Sr2+ and Ba2+) have received attention as ion carriers for next-generation batteries (Wang et al., 2013), and their perchlorates are used as inorganic salts of conventional nonaqueous electrolytes for electrochemical cells in Mg- and Ca-ion batteries (Whittingham et al., 2018; Tchitchekova et al., 2017; Padigi et al., 2015). It is crucial to obtain anhydrous salts to achieve high electrochemical cell performance since hydrated salts can cause unwanted side reactions as a result of increased water content in the nonaqueous electrolyte. Strontium perchlorate is highly hygroscopic and exists in several hydrated forms. So far, Sr(ClO4)2·3H2O, Sr(ClO4)2·4H2O and Sr(ClO4)2·9H2O have been identified by single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Hennings et al., 2014). However, the of the anhydrous phase has not been reported to date because of the difficulty in growing single crystals. Previously, we have determined the structures of anhydrous magnesium, barium and calcium perchlorate from laboratory powder X-ray diffraction data (Lim et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2015, 2018). Using the same techniques for the Sr salt, we were able to determine and refine the of strontium perchlorate anhydrate.
2. Structural commentary
The 4)2, is isotypic with Ca(AlD4)2 (Sato et al., 2009) and Ca(ClO4)2 (Lee et al., 2018). Compared with Ca(ClO4)2, the unit-cell parameters a, b and c of Sr(ClO4)2 are increased by 3.0, 2.9 and 3.4%, respectively, because Sr2+ (1.26 Å for eight-coordination) has a larger ionic radius than Ca2+ (1.12 Å for eight-coordination; Shannon, 1976).
of anhydrous strontium perchlorate, Sr(ClOThere are one Sr, two Cl and eight O sites in the c. The (Fig. 1) is composed of Sr2+ cations and isolated ClO4− tetrahedra. The isolated ClO4− tetrahedra are slightly distorted and exhibit a range of 105.4 (7)–113.5 (7)° for the O—Cl—O angles. The local environment around the Sr2+ cation is presented in Fig. 2. It is coordinated by eight O atoms from eight ClO4− tetrahedra, with an average Sr—O distance of 2.582 Å (Table 1). The latter is intermediate between those of Ca—O (2.476 Å; Lee et al., 2018) and Ba—O (2.989 Å; Lee et al., 2015) polyhedra, and in good agreement with the sum of the ionic radii of the respective alkaline earth metal and oxygen ions (Shannon, 1976).
all on general positions 8Empirical bond valence sums (BVSs) can be used to check structure models (Brown, 2002). In this regard, the BVSs for the ions in the of Sr(ClO4)2 were calculated with the program Valence (Brown & Altermatt, 1985; Brese & O'Keeffe, 1991; Hormillosa et al., 1993). The expected charges of the ions match well with the obtained BVS values (given in valence units), thus confirming the validity of the Sr 2.18, Cl1 6.99, Cl2 6.96, O1 1.91, O2 2.08, O3 2.06, O4 2.03, O5 1.96, O6 2.02, O7 2.03 and O8 2.04.
3. Synthesis and crystallization
Anhydrous strontium perchlorate was obtained by dehydration of Sr(ClO4)2·3H2O (98%, Alfa Aesar). The hydrated Sr(ClO4)2 powder was ground thoroughly in an agate mortar and added to a glass bottle. The bottle was placed in an oven at 523 K for two weeks under atmospheric conditions and then transferred to a glove-box under an argon atmosphere. For the powder X-ray diffraction measurements, anhydrous Sr(ClO4)2 was again ground in an agate mortar and placed in a tightly sealed dome-type X-ray sample holder commercially available from Bruker. The dome was double-sealed with vacuum grease to prevent hydration during measurement.
4. details
Details of the crystal data collection and structure . Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) data for anhydrous Sr(ClO4)2 were collected from a Bragg–Brentano diffractometer (PANalytical Empyrean) using Cu Kα1 radiation, a focusing primary Ge(111) monochromator (λ = 1.5406 Å) and a position-sensitive PIXcel 3D 2×2 detector. The angular range was 10 ≤ 2θ ≤ 130°, with a step of 0.0131° and a total measurement time of 8 h at room temperature. The PXRD pattern was indexed using the TREOR90 algorithm (Werner, 1990) run in CRYSFIRE (Shirley, 2002) through the positions of 23 reflections, resulting in an orthorhombic Systematic suggested the Pbca. The was determined by a combination of the powder profile program GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2000) and the single-crystal structure program CRYSTALS (Betteridge et al., 2003). For a three-dimensional view of the Fourier electron-density maps, MCE was applied (Rohlícek & Husák, 2007). Initially, a structural model with only one dummy atom at an arbitrary position in the was used. Structure factors were extracted from the powder data and then were applied to calculate the initial solution of the using SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008) run in CRYSTALS, which yielded the Sr site as a starting atomic position. The initial dummy atom model was then replaced with the partial model, and this data was adopted for a Le Bail fit in GSAS. Improved structure factors were then extracted, which were used for the in CRYSTALS. Such processes were iterated until a complete and satisfactory structural model was obtained. Finally, in GSAS was employed to complete the structure model, resulting in reasonable isotropic displacement parameters and agreement indices. For the final with GSAS, the Sr—O and Cl—O bond lengths were restrained with a tolerance value of 2% with respect to the distances determined from CRYSTALS, which matched reasonably well with the radii sums of Shannon (1976). The final Rietveld plot is displayed in Fig. 3.
are summarized in Table 2
|
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 1901870
Data collection: X'Pert Data Collector (PANalytical, 2011); cell
GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2000); data reduction: X'Pert HighScore Plus (PANalytical, 2011); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008) and CRYSTALS (Betteridge et al., 2003); program(s) used to refine structure: GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2000); molecular graphics: VESTA (Momma & Izumi, 2011); software used to prepare material for publication: GSAS (Larson & Von Dreele, 2000).Sr(ClO4)2 | Z = 8 |
Mr = 286.52 | F(000) = 1088.0 |
Orthorhombic, Pbca | Dx = 2.925 Mg m−3 |
Hall symbol: -P_2ac_2ab | Cu Kα1 radiation, λ = 1.5405 Å |
a = 14.18206 (10) Å | T = 298 K |
b = 9.78934 (11) Å | white |
c = 9.37624 (10) Å | flat_sheet, 24.9 × 24.9 mm |
V = 1301.73 (2) Å3 | Specimen preparation: Prepared at 298 K |
PANalytical Empyrean diffractometer | Data collection mode: reflection |
Radiation source: sealed X-ray tube, PANalytical Cu Ceramic X-ray tube | Scan method: step |
Specimen mounting: packed powder | 2θmin = 10.009°, 2θmax = 129.991°, 2θstep = 0.013° |
Least-squares matrix: full | Profile function: CW Profile function number 4 with 18 terms Pseudovoigt profile coefficients as parameterized in P. Thompson, D.E. Cox & J.B. Hastings (1987). J. Appl. Cryst.,20,79-83. Asymmetry correction of L.W. Finger, D.E. Cox & A. P. Jephcoat (1994). J. Appl. Cryst.,27,892-900. Microstrain broadening by P.W. Stephens, (1999). J. Appl. Cryst.,32,281-289. #1(GU) = 0.000 #2(GV) = 0.000 #3(GW) = 0.000 #4(GP) = 9.252 #5(LX) = 0.900 #6(ptec) = 0.00 #7(trns) = 0.00 #8(shft) = -3.8100 #9(sfec) = 0.00 #10(S/L) = 0.0208 #11(H/L) = 0.0005 #12(eta) = 0.7500 #13(S400 ) = 0.0E+00 #14(S040 ) = 7.8E-04 #15(S004 ) = 1.5E-04 #16(S220 ) = 3.7E-04 #17(S202 ) = 6.1E-04 #18(S022 ) = -1.1E-03 Peak tails are ignored where the intensity is below 0.0010 times the peak Aniso. broadening axis 0.0 0.0 1.0 |
Rp = 0.086 | 40 parameters |
Rwp = 0.125 | 23 restraints |
Rexp = 0.096 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.05 |
R(F2) = 0.14871 | Background function: GSAS Background function number 1 with 34 terms. Shifted Chebyshev function of 1st kind 1: 118.082 2: -166.900 3: 123.865 4: -59.7925 5: 10.6865 6: 21.3336 7: -31.0975 8: 23.2200 9: -6.96687 10: -9.51726 11: 20.8794 12: -23.8022 13: 18.4347 14: -9.14997 15: -1.10995 16: 9.35323 17: -13.3633 18: 13.2873 19: -9.61569 20: 4.08246 21: 1.61524 22: -5.79316 23: 6.77390 24: -5.01271 25: 2.27833 26: 0.646733 27: -2.78842 28: 3.78393 29: -3.23100 30: 2.18997 31: -0.908158 32: -0.401332 33: 0.778547 34: -0.792308 |
9139 data points | Preferred orientation correction: March-Dollase AXIS 1 Ratio= 0.79858 h= 1.000 k= 0.000 l= 0.000 Prefered orientation correction range: Min= 0.71363, Max= 1.96360 |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Sr1 | 0.60125 (9) | 0.46444 (17) | 0.2136 (2) | 0.0206 (3)* | |
Cl1 | 0.4370 (3) | 0.2794 (4) | 0.4905 (4) | 0.0254 (3)* | |
Cl2 | 0.1592 (2) | 0.3965 (4) | 0.6866 (4) | 0.0275 (3)* | |
O1 | 0.1833 (5) | 0.2549 (6) | 0.7237 (14) | 0.0271 (14)* | |
O2 | 0.2200 (4) | 0.4878 (11) | 0.7587 (12) | 0.0335 (14)* | |
O3 | 0.1636 (7) | 0.4175 (13) | 0.5363 (6) | 0.0364 (14)* | |
O4 | 0.0665 (4) | 0.4250 (10) | 0.7362 (11) | 0.0225 (14)* | |
O5 | 0.3759 (6) | 0.2145 (7) | 0.3888 (11) | 0.0356 (14)* | |
O6 | 0.3829 (6) | 0.3692 (11) | 0.5799 (10) | 0.0361 (14)* | |
O7 | 0.4728 (6) | 0.1764 (11) | 0.5835 (12) | 0.0315 (14)* | |
O8 | 0.5132 (6) | 0.3514 (12) | 0.4267 (12) | 0.0305 (14)* |
Sr1—Cl1 | 3.931 (4) | Cl2—Sr1ix | 3.945 (3) |
Sr1—Cl1i | 3.937 (4) | Cl2—Sr1ii | 3.778 (3) |
Sr1—Cl1ii | 3.779 (4) | Cl2—Sr1x | 3.746 (4) |
Sr1—Cl1iii | 3.669 (4) | Cl2—Sr1xi | 3.898 (4) |
Sr1—Cl2iv | 3.945 (3) | Cl2—O1 | 1.469 (5) |
Sr1—Cl2ii | 3.778 (3) | Cl2—O2 | 1.414 (5) |
Sr1—Cl2v | 3.746 (4) | Cl2—O3 | 1.425 (5) |
Sr1—Cl2vi | 3.898 (4) | Cl2—O4 | 1.422 (5) |
Sr1—O1v | 2.512 (5) | O1—Sr1x | 2.512 (5) |
Sr1—O2ii | 2.591 (5) | O1—Cl2 | 1.469 (5) |
Sr1—O3vi | 2.546 (5) | O2—Sr1ii | 2.591 (5) |
Sr1—O4iv | 2.622 (5) | O2—Cl2 | 1.414 (5) |
Sr1—O5iii | 2.650 (5) | O3—Sr1xi | 2.546 (5) |
Sr1—O6ii | 2.540 (5) | O3—Cl2 | 1.425 (5) |
Sr1—O7i | 2.590 (5) | O4—Sr1ix | 2.622 (5) |
Sr1—O8 | 2.604 (8) | O4—Cl2 | 1.422 (5) |
Cl1—Sr1 | 3.931 (4) | O5—Sr1viii | 2.650 (5) |
Cl1—Sr1vii | 3.937 (4) | O5—Cl1 | 1.436 (5) |
Cl1—Sr1ii | 3.779 (4) | O6—Sr1ii | 2.540 (5) |
Cl1—Sr1viii | 3.669 (4) | O6—Cl1 | 1.436 (5) |
Cl1—O5 | 1.436 (5) | O7—Sr1vii | 2.590 (5) |
Cl1—O6 | 1.436 (5) | O7—Cl1 | 1.426 (5) |
Cl1—O7 | 1.426 (5) | O8—Sr1 | 2.604 (8) |
Cl1—O8 | 1.423 (5) | O8—Cl1 | 1.423 (5) |
O1v—Sr1—O2ii | 71.2 (3) | O5iii—Sr1—O8 | 136.8 (4) |
O1v—Sr1—O3vi | 84.3 (4) | O6ii—Sr1—O7i | 139.7 (3) |
O1v—Sr1—O4iv | 138.9 (3) | O6ii—Sr1—O8 | 74.3 (4) |
O1v—Sr1—O5iii | 144.9 (3) | O7i—Sr1—O8 | 78.3 (4) |
O1v—Sr1—O6ii | 109.2 (4) | O5—Cl1—O6 | 109.7 (5) |
O1v—Sr1—O7i | 88.9 (4) | O5—Cl1—O7 | 108.0 (7) |
O1v—Sr1—O8 | 71.3 (4) | O5—Cl1—O8 | 113.5 (7) |
O2ii—Sr1—O3vi | 77.6 (3) | O6—Cl1—O7 | 105.4 (7) |
O2ii—Sr1—O4iv | 143.6 (3) | O6—Cl1—O8 | 110.3 (7) |
O2ii—Sr1—O5iii | 75.5 (3) | O7—Cl1—O8 | 109.7 (7) |
O2ii—Sr1—O6ii | 73.8 (3) | O1—Cl2—O2 | 110.0 (7) |
O2ii—Sr1—O7i | 146.3 (3) | O1—Cl2—O3 | 111.1 (7) |
O2ii—Sr1—O8 | 118.0 (4) | O1—Cl2—O4 | 108.8 (6) |
O3vi—Sr1—O4iv | 117.7 (3) | O2—Cl2—O3 | 110.7 (8) |
O3vi—Sr1—O5iii | 77.9 (3) | O2—Cl2—O4 | 106.4 (6) |
O3vi—Sr1—O6ii | 141.9 (4) | O3—Cl2—O4 | 109.6 (6) |
O3vi—Sr1—O7i | 73.4 (3) | Sr1x—O1—Cl2 | 139.0 (5) |
O3vi—Sr1—O8 | 142.8 (4) | Sr1ii—O2—Cl2 | 139.4 (5) |
O4iv—Sr1—O5iii | 76.1 (3) | Sr1xi—O3—Cl2 | 157.0 (6) |
O4iv—Sr1—O6ii | 75.8 (3) | Sr1ix—O4—Cl2 | 153.3 (6) |
O4iv—Sr1—O7i | 67.6 (3) | Sr1viii—O5—Cl1 | 125.1 (4) |
O4iv—Sr1—O8 | 71.2 (4) | Sr1ii—O6—Cl1 | 142.2 (5) |
O5iii—Sr1—O6ii | 70.9 (4) | Sr1vii—O7—Cl1 | 156.2 (7) |
O5iii—Sr1—O7i | 114.04 (3) | Sr1—O8—Cl1 | 153.9 (7) |
Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1/2, z−1/2; (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (iii) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) −x+1/2, −y+1, z−1/2; (v) x+1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1; (vi) x+1/2, y, −z+1/2; (vii) x, −y+1/2, z+1/2; (viii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (ix) −x+1/2, −y+1, z+1/2; (x) x−1/2, −y+1/2, −z+1; (xi) x−1/2, y, −z+1/2. |
Funding information
Funding for this research was provided by: the Creative Materials Discovery Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2015M3D1A1069707).
References
Betteridge, P. W., Carruthers, J. R., Cooper, R. I., Prout, K. & Watkin, D. J. (2003). J. Appl. Cryst. 36, 1487. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Brese, N. E. & O'Keeffe, M. (1991). Acta Cryst. B47, 192–197. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Brown, I. D. (2002). In The Chemical Bond in Inorganic Chemistry. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Brown, I. D. & Altermatt, D. (1985). Acta Cryst. B41, 244–247. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hennings, E., Schmidt, H. & Voigt, W. (2014). Acta Cryst. E70, 510–514. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hormillosa, C., Healy, S., Stephen, T. & Brown, I. D. (1993). Bond Valence Calculator. Version 2.0. McMaster University, Canada. https://www.CCP14.ac.uk/solution/bond_valence/. Google Scholar
Larson, A. C. & Von Dreele, R. B. (2000). General Structure Analysis System (GSAS). Report LAUR 86-748. Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, USA. Google Scholar
Lee, D., Bu, H., Kim, D., Hyoung, J. & Hong, S.-T. (2018). Acta Cryst. E74, 514–517. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Lee, J. H., Kang, J. H., Lim, S.-C. & Hong, S.-T. (2015). Acta Cryst. E71, 588–591. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Lim, H.-K., Choi, Y. S. & Hong, S.-T. (2011). Acta Cryst. C67, i36–i38. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Momma, K. & Izumi, F. (2011). J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 1272–1276. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Padigi, P., Goncher, G., Evans, D. & Solanki, R. (2015). J. Power Sources, 273, 460–464. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
PANalytical (2011). X'Pert Data Collector and X'Pert HighScore Plus. PANalytical BV, Almelo, The Netherlands. Google Scholar
Rohlíček, J. & Hušák, M. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 600–601. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sato, T., Sørby, M. H., Ikeda, K., Sato, S., Hauback, B. C. & Orimo, S. (2009). J. Alloys Compd. 487, 472–478. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Shannon, R. D. (1976). Acta Cryst. A32, 751–767. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Shirley, R. (2002). The Crysfire 2002 System for Automatic Powder Indexing: User's Manual. Guildford, UK: The Lattice Press. Google Scholar
Tchitchekova, D. S., Monti, D., Johansson, P., Bardé, F., Randon-Vitanova, A., Palacín, M. R. & Pnrouch, A. (2017). J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A1384–A1392. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Wang, R. Y., Wessells, C. D., Huggins, R. A. & Cui, Y. (2013). Nano Lett. 13, 5748–5752. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Werner, P. E. (1990). TREOR90. University of? Stockholm, Sweden. Google Scholar
Whittingham, M. S., Siu, C. & Ding, J. (2018). Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 258–264. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.