research communications
of 2,3,5,6-tetrabromoterephthalonitrile
aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: nolan001@umn.edu
The title crystal (systematic name: 2,3,5,6-tetrabromobenzene-1,4-dicarbonitrile), C8Br4N2, is the first bromo analog in a study of cyano-halo (C≡N⋯X) non-bonded contacts in crystals of halogenated dicyanobenzenes. The complete molecule is generated by a crystallographic center of symmetry. In the extended structure, each Br atom accepts one C≡N⋯Br interaction, and each N atom is bisected by two. This contact network forms a nearly planar sheet structure propagating in the (01) plane, similar to that reported in hexamethylbenzene co-crystals of the tetrachloro analog.
Keywords: crystal structure; nitrile; N⋯Br contacts.
CCDC reference: 1911575
1. Chemical context
The title crystal is part of a study of solid-state C≡N⋯X (X = F, Cl, Br, I) non-bonded contacts in substituted benzonitriles. The question is whether these contacts will form for a given nitrile, and whether they are isolated or extended to create ribbon or sheet structures in their crystals. The prevailing trend is that C≡N⋯F contacts do not form (Bond et al., 2001), C≡N⋯Cl contacts form in isolation or as inversion dimers (Pink et al., 2000), and C≡N⋯Br and ⋯I contacts form networks (Noland et al., 2018). Contact strength tends to increase with the polarizability of the halogen atom (Desiraju & Harlow, 1989).
The crystal structures of neat (i.e. not co-crystals, no solvent included in the crystal) halogenated terephthalodinitriles have followed this trend. The crystal of 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoroterephthalodinitrile (F4TN) does not contain any C≡N⋯F contacts, with molecules adopting a sawtooth formation (Fig. 1a; Hirshfeld, 1984), similar to a crystal of pentafluorobenzonitrile (Bond et al., 2001). The crystal of the tetrachloro analog (Cl4TN) contains one C≡N⋯Cl contact per N atom, forming staggered C22(14) chains (Britton, 1981b; Fig. 1b). In co-crystals of Cl4TN with anthracene (Britton, 2005b), phenanthrene, or pyrene (Britton, 2005a), no C≡N⋯Cl contacts are found. However, Cl4TN and the corresponding ortho- and meta-dicyano isomers each form co-crystals with hexamethylbenzene wherein C≡N⋯Cl-based sheets occur, in alternating layers with sheets of hexamethylbenzene (Britton, 2002). No crystals involving the title compound (Br4TN) have been reported previously.
2. Structural commentary
In the crystal of Br4TN, the molecules lie about an inversion center and a vertical mirror plane, and are almost planar (Fig. 2). The ring C2/C3 atoms have r.m.s. deviations of 0.002 (2) Å from the plane of best fit. The Br1 and N1 atoms deviate from this plane by 0.038 (4) and 0.026 (9) Å, respectively. This distortion is chair-like, with adjacent ring positions bent to opposite sides of the best-fit plane.
3. Supramolecular features
C≡N⋯Br contacts are the most prominent packing feature (Table 1). The length of these contacts is similar to 3.064 (4) Å, the mean C≡N⋯Br distance found in crystals of 2,4,6-tribromobenzonitrile (Br3BN; Noland et al., 2018). The N and ortho-Br atoms of Br3BN form a contact network similar to a half-molecule of Br4TN. Pairs of these contacts form centrosymmetric R22(10) rings (Fig. 3). Each molecule of Br4TN participates in four such rings, generating a nearly planar sheet structure that is similar to Cl4TN layers in the Cl4TN-hexamethylbenzene (Britton, 2002). In Br4TN, adjacent sheets stack roughly along [70], and the [001] translation relates molecules in neighboring sheets.
4. Database survey
A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.40, November 2018; Groom et al., 2016) found six additional reports similar to Br4TN. For F4TN, a with 9-acetylanthracene (Wang et al., 2018), and an η2-complex with tungsten(II) (Kiplinger et al., 1997) are both given; these contain no C≡N⋯F contacts. Neat crystals are reported for the ortho- (Britton, 1981c) and meta-dicyano (Hu et al., 2004) isomers of Cl4TN, and 2,4,6-trichlorotricyanobenzene (Britton, 1981a).
5. Synthesis and crystallization
2,3,5,6-Tetrabromoterephthaldiamide (Br4TA), adapted from the work of Schäfer et al. (2017): Tetrabromoterephthalic acid (4.01 g; Sigma–Aldrich, Inc., No. 524441) and thionyl chloride (24 mL) were combined in a round-bottomed flask. The resulting mixture was refluxed for 3 h, and then cooled to ambient temperature. The thionyl chloride was removed under reduced pressure. The resulting white solid was dissolved in 1,4-dioxane (60 mL). An ammonium hydroxide solution (15 M, 50 mL) was added and then the mixture was stirred for 18 h. Water (50 mL) and an Na2CO3 solution (2 M, 50 mL) were added, and then the mixture was stirred for 24 h. A precipitate was collected by suction filtration, and then washed with water, giving a white powder (5.71 g, 71%). A trace of ammonium chloride could not be removed, based on the MS results. M.p. 627 K (lit. 615 K; Knobloch & Ramirez, 1975); 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6; 2 conformers obs.) δ 8.085 (s, 2H, both), 7.936 (s, 2H, minor), 7.889 (s, 2H, major); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 166.8 (2C), 143.4 (2C), 122.2 (4C); IR (KBr, cm−1) 3292, 3158, 2966, 2907, 2853, 1679, 1427, 1315, 1287, 1252, 1114, 1089, 866; MS (ESI, m/z) [M+35Cl]− calculated for C8H479Br281Br2N2O2 514.6660, found 514.6672.
2,3,5,6-Tetrabromoterephthalodinitrile (Br4TN), adapted from the work of Schäfer et al. (2017) (Fig. 4): A portion of Br4TA (515 mg) and phosphorus oxychloride (16 mL) were combined in a round-bottomed flask. The resulting mixture was refluxed for 24 h, then cooled to ambient temperature, and then poured into ice–water (200 mL). This mixture was stirred until the ice melted, then a precipitate was collected by suction filtration, and then washed with water, giving a white powder (342 mg, 72%). M.p. 603 K; 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 129.6 (4C, C3), 123.5 (2C, C2), 116.0 (2C, C1); IR (KBr, cm−1) 2236, 1364, 1330, 1293, 1229, 1156, 1121, 732; MS (EI, m/z) [M]+ calculated for C879Br281Br2N2 443.6749, found 443.6764.
Crystallization: A solution of Br4TN (150 mg) in bis(2-methoxyethyl) ether (10 mL) at 425 K was cooled by 30 K h−1 until a precipitate began to form. The temperature was held for 1 h, and then cooled by 10 K h−1 to ambient temperature. After 24 h, colorless, highly twinned, prismatic crystals were collected by decantation and then washed with methanol. A monocrystalline tip similar to the one indicated in Fig. 5 was harvested for X-ray diffraction.
6. Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure
details are summarized in Table 2Supporting information
CCDC reference: 1911575
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989019005486/hb7811sup1.cif
contains datablock I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989019005486/hb7811Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989019005486/hb7811Isup3.cml
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2012); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2012); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2012); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT2014/5 (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).C8Br4N2 | Dx = 2.827 Mg m−3 |
Mr = 443.74 | Melting point: 603 K |
Monoclinic, C2/m | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 7.8500 (6) Å | Cell parameters from 2993 reflections |
b = 9.8330 (8) Å | θ = 3.0–30.4° |
c = 6.7540 (6) Å | µ = 15.40 mm−1 |
β = 90.202 (4)° | T = 100 K |
V = 521.33 (7) Å3 | Prism, colourless |
Z = 2 | 0.15 × 0.06 × 0.03 mm |
F(000) = 404 |
Bruker VENTURE PHOTON-II area detector diffractometer | 741 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Radiation source: micro-focus | Rint = 0.063 |
φ and ω scans | θmax = 30.6°, θmin = 3.0° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) | h = −11→9 |
Tmin = 0.253, Tmax = 0.494 | k = −13→14 |
3324 measured reflections | l = −9→9 |
837 independent reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: dual |
Least-squares matrix: full | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0175P)2 + 0.7909P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
wR(F2) = 0.072 | Δρmax = 1.09 e Å−3 |
S = 1.04 | Δρmin = −1.01 e Å−3 |
837 reflections | Extinction correction: SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick 2015b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
38 parameters | Extinction coefficient: 0.0029 (10) |
0 restraints |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Br1 | 0.40138 (3) | 0.78605 (3) | 0.77786 (4) | 0.01672 (15) | |
N1 | 0.2553 (5) | 0.500000 | 0.4857 (5) | 0.0219 (7) | |
C1 | 0.3260 (5) | 0.500000 | 0.6333 (6) | 0.0158 (7) | |
C2 | 0.4158 (5) | 0.500000 | 0.8209 (6) | 0.0148 (7) | |
C3 | 0.4576 (3) | 0.6237 (3) | 0.9090 (4) | 0.0142 (5) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Br1 | 0.0186 (2) | 0.0174 (2) | 0.0142 (2) | 0.00120 (9) | 0.00004 (12) | 0.00249 (9) |
N1 | 0.0253 (19) | 0.0198 (18) | 0.0204 (19) | 0.000 | −0.0045 (15) | 0.000 |
C1 | 0.0190 (19) | 0.0140 (19) | 0.0144 (18) | 0.000 | 0.0032 (14) | 0.000 |
C2 | 0.0125 (17) | 0.021 (2) | 0.0113 (16) | 0.000 | 0.0035 (13) | 0.000 |
C3 | 0.0138 (12) | 0.0151 (14) | 0.0136 (13) | 0.0007 (9) | 0.0026 (10) | 0.0018 (10) |
Br1—C3 | 1.878 (3) | C2—C3 | 1.393 (3) |
N1—C1 | 1.139 (5) | C2—C3i | 1.393 (3) |
C1—C2 | 1.448 (5) | C3—C3ii | 1.395 (5) |
N1—C1—C2 | 180.0 (4) | C2—C3—C3ii | 119.17 (17) |
C3—C2—C3i | 121.7 (3) | C2—C3—Br1 | 119.1 (2) |
C3—C2—C1 | 119.17 (17) | C3ii—C3—Br1 | 121.75 (8) |
C3i—C2—C1 | 119.17 (17) | ||
C3i—C2—C3—C3ii | −0.5 (6) | C3i—C2—C3—Br1 | 178.56 (19) |
C1—C2—C3—C3ii | 179.2 (3) | C1—C2—C3—Br1 | −1.7 (4) |
Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1, z; (ii) −x+1, y, −z+2. |
C≡N···Br | C≡N | N···Br | C≡N···Br |
C1≡N1···Br1i | 1.139 (5) | 3.015 (2) | 135.48 (5) |
Symmetry code: (i) -x + 1/2, -y + 1/2, -z + 1. |
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Victor G. Young, Jr. (X-Ray Crystallographic Laboratory, University of Minnesota) for assistance with the crystallographic determination, the Wayland E. Noland Research Fellowship Fund at the University of Minnesota Foundation for generous financial support of this project, and Doyle Britton (deceased July 7, 2015) for providing the basis of this project.
References
Bond, A. D., Davies, J. E., Griffiths, J. & Rawson, J. M. (2001). Acta Cryst. E57, o231–o233. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Britton, D. (1981a). Cryst. Struct. Commun. 10, 1061–1064. CAS Google Scholar
Britton, D. (1981b). Cryst. Struct. Commun. 10, 1501–1508. CAS Google Scholar
Britton, D. (1981c). Cryst. Struct. Commun. 10, 1509–1512. CAS Google Scholar
Britton, D. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 553–563. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Britton, D. (2005a). Acta Cryst. C61, o662–o664. CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Britton, D. (2005b). Acta Cryst. E61, o1707–o1708. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bruker (2012). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Desiraju, G. R. & Harlow, R. L. (1989). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 6757–6764. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hirshfeld, F. L. (1984). Acta Cryst. B40, 484–492. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hu, X., Yuan, Z. & Lu, G. (2004). Powder Diffr. 19, 325–328. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Kiplinger, J. L., Arif, A. M. & Richmond, T. G. (1997). Organometallics, 16, 246–254. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Knobloch, J. O. & Ramirez, F. (1975). J. Org. Chem. 40, 1101–1106. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Noland, W. E., Britton, D., Sutton, G. K., Schneerer, A. K. & Tritch, K. J. (2018). Acta Cryst. E74, 98–102. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Pink, M., Britton, D., Noland, W. E. & Pinnow, M. J. (2000). Acta Cryst. C56, 1271–1273. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Schäfer, J., Holzapfel, M., Mladenova, B., Kattnig, D., Krummenacher, I., Braunschweig, H., Grampp, G. & Lambert, C. (2017). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 6200–6209. PubMed Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wang, J., Li, A., Xu, S., Li, B., Song, C., Geng, Y., Chu, N., He, J. & Xu, W. (2018). J. Mater. Chem. C. 6, 8958–8965. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.