Synthesis, structure determination and characterization by UV–Vis and IR spectroscopy of bis­(diiso­propyl­ammonium) cis-di­chlorido­bis(oxalato-κ2O1,O2)stannate(IV)

Sarr, B.; Mbaye, A.; Diop, C.A.K.; Sidibe, M.; Rousselin, Y.

doi:10.1107/S2056989019006030

research communications

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 75| Part 6| June 2019| Pages 742-745

https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989019006030

Open

access

Synthesis, structure determination and characterization by UV–Vis and IR spectroscopy of bis(diisopropylammonium) cis-dichloridobis(oxalato-κ²O¹,O²)stannate(IV)

Bougar Sarr,^a ^* Abdou Mbaye,^b Cheikh Abdoul Khadir Diop,^a Mamadou Sidibe ^a and Yoann Rousselin ^c

^aLaboratoire de Chimie Minérale et Analytique, Département de Chimie, Faculté des Sciences et Téchniques, Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal, ^bLaboratoire de Chimie et de Physique des Matériaux (LCPM) de l'Université Assane Seck de Ziguinchor (UASZ), BP 523 Ziguinchor, Senegal, and ^cICMUB-UMR 6302, 9, avenue Alain Savary 21000 Dijon, France
^*Correspondence e-mail: bouks89@gmail.com

Edited by M. Weil, Vienna University of Technology, Austria (Received 1 April 2019; accepted 30 April 2019; online 3 May 2019)

The organic–inorganic title salt, (C₆H₁₆N)₂[Sn(C₂O₄)₂Cl₂] or (ⁱPr₂NH₂)₂[Sn(C₂O₄)₂Cl₂], was obtained by reacting bis(diisopropylammonium) oxalate with tin(IV) chloride dihydrate in methanol. The Sn^IV atom is coordinated by two chelating oxalate ligands and two chloride ions in cis positions, giving rise to an [Sn(C₂O₄)₂Cl₂]²⁻ anion (point group symmetry 2), with the Sn^IV atom in a slightly distorted octahedral coordination. The cohesion of the crystal structure is ensured by the formation of N—H⋯O hydrogen bonding between (ⁱPr₂NH₂)⁺ cations and [SnCl₂(C₂O₄)₂]²⁻ anions. This gives rise to an infinite chain structure extending parallel to [101]. The main inter-chain interactions are van der Waals forces. The electronic spectrum of the title compound displays only one high intensity band in the UV region assignable to ligand–metal ion charge-transfer (LMCT) transitions. An IR spectrum was also recorded and is discussed.

Keywords: crystal structure; tin(IV) oxalate derivative; spectroscopic studies; hydrogen bonding.

CCDC reference: 1833609

1. Chemical context

As a result of their numerous applications in medicine, industry and agriculture (Kapoor et al., 2005 ), tin(IV) carboxylate compounds have attracted the attention of several research groups, resulting in the preparation and characterization of new compounds (Christie et al., 1979 ; Ng & Kumar Das, 1993 ; Rocamora-Reverte et al., 2012 ; Reichelt & Reuter, 2014 ). Derivatives of tin(IV) oxalate are a subclass of the tin(IV) carboxylate family and have likewise been studied extensively because oxalate ions, C₂O₄^2–, play an important role as counter-ions or complex ligands in inorganic as well as in organometallic chemistry. One of the motivations to study these compounds is related to the rich coordinating behaviour of the oxalato ligand, which can adopt a monodentate, a bridging monodentate, a bridging bidentate, a monochelating, bidentate or a bichelating mode (Miskelly et al., 1983 ; Sow et al., 2012 ; Świtlicka-Olszewska et al., 2014 ). In this context, our group has previously published the syntheses and crystal structure determinations of some tin(IV) oxalate derivatives (Sarr et al., 2013 , 2018 ). As a continuation of this work, we have studied the interaction between bis(diisopropylammonium) oxalate with tin(IV) chloride dihydrate, which yielded the title salt (C₆H₁₆N)₂[Sn(C₂O₄)₂Cl₂] or (ⁱPr₂NH₂)₂[Sn(C₂O₄)₂Cl₂]. Its crystal structure was determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction and was confirmed by infrared and UV–visible spectroscopic studies.

2. Structural commentary

The asymmetric unit of (ⁱPr₂NH₂)₂[Sn(C₂O₄)₂Cl₂] comprises one diisopropylammonium cation and one half of an [Sn(C₂O₄)₂Cl₂]²⁻ anion, the other half being completed by the application of twofold rotation symmetry (Fig. 1) with the rotation axis running through the central Sn^IV atom. The latter is chelated by two oxalate ligands and is additionally ligated by two Cl atoms in cis positions within a distorted octahedral coordination sphere [Cl1ⁱ—Sn1—Cl1= 97.26 (4)°; O1—Sn1—O4 = O1ⁱ—Sn1—O4ⁱ = 79.27 (6) °, O1—Sn1—O4ⁱ = 90.21 (6)°; symmetry code: (i) x + $[{1\over 2}]$ , −y + $[{3\over 2}]$ , z − $[{1\over 2}]$ ]. Atoms Cl1ⁱ, O1, O1ⁱ and O4 define the equatorial plane [with a slight shift of Sn1 from this plane by 0.1163 (5) Å; rms = 0.0687 Å] while Cl1 and O4ⁱ occupy the axial positions. The O4ⁱ—Sn1—Cl1 angle of 168.50 (4)° indicates a considerable deviation from linearity, which might be explained by the difference in size of the Cl and O atoms and by the small bite angle of 79.27 (6)° between the central Sn^IV atom and the chelating O1 and O4 atoms.

Figure 1
The molecular entities in the organic–inorganic title salt drawn with displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level; hydrogen atoms are depicted as spheres of arbitrary radius

As in the related structure of (ⁱPr₂NH₂)₂[Sn(C₂O₄)₂I₂] (Sarr et al., 2018), the lengths of the C—O bonds within the oxalate ligands vary slightly because of the different functions of the oxygen atoms involved in the coordination of Sn^IV. The C—O bond lengths of coordinating O atoms [O1—C7 = 1.289 (2) Å; O4—C8 = 1.289 (2) Å] are significantly longer than those of non-coordinating O atoms [O2—C7 = 1.222 (2) Å, O3—C8 = 1.223 (2) Å]. The Sn1—C1l distance of 2.3422 (9) Å as well as the Sn—O distances of 2.0710 (16) Å (O1) and of 2.1057 (15) Å (O4) are slightly shorter than corresponding bonds reported previously (Reichelt & Reuter, 2014; Sarr et al., 2013; Diop et al., 2011 ; Sow et al., 2013 ; Skapski et al., 1974 ).

3. Supramolecular features

Each anionic complex [Sn(C₂O₄)₂Cl₂]^2– is linked to two neighbours via four diisopropylammonium cations through N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, leading to infinite chains parallel to [101] (Table 1, Fig. 2). In a chain, the two non-coordinating oxygen atoms (O2 and O3) of each oxalate ligand are involved as acceptors in hydrogen-bonding interactions (Table 1). The chains are arranged into layers extending parallel to (010), mainly interconnected by van der Waals forces (Fig. 3).

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯O3ⁱ	0.91	2.05	2.943 (2)	167
N1—H1B⋯O2ⁱⁱ	0.91	1.95	2.855 (2)	177
Symmetry codes: (i) $[x+{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{3\over 2}}, z-{\script{1\over 2}}]$ ; (ii) $[-x+1, y, -z+{\script{3\over 2}}]$ .

Figure 2
An infinite chain in the title structure, showing the N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds as light-blue dashed lines. C-bound H atoms have been omitted for clarity.

Figure 3
The crystal packing of the title compound in a view down [001]. C-bound H atoms have been omitted for clarity.

4. Database survey

A search in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, version 5.40, update Nov. 2018; Groom et al., 2016 ) resulted in 226 hits dealing with diisopropylammonium cations while only one hit deals with the [Sn(C₂O₄)₂Cl₂]^2– anion (Sarr et al., 2013).

5. Synthesis and crystallization

The title salt was obtained by mixing bis(diisopropylammonium) oxalate (ⁱPr₂NH₂)₂C₂O_4; 0.30 g; 15.50 mmol) and tin(IV) chloride dihydrate (SnCl₂·2H₂O; (0.34 g; 15.50 mmol) in a 1:1 molar ratio in methanol. The obtained yellow solution was stirred for one h and then filtered. Colourless prism-like crystals were obtained by slow evaporation of the filtrate over a period of ten days.

The IR spectrum confirms the presence of oxalate and diisopropylammonium groups in the title salt. In addition, the appearance of valence vibrations (–CO₂) in the form of three bands shows that the oxalate ligands are not centrosymmetric, in agreement with the difference in the C—O bond lengths revealed by the X-ray study. Attributions of the vibrational bands of the title compound were made by comparison with previous studies (Sarr et al., 2018; Marinescu et al., 2002 ; Li et al., 2008 ). The vibrational bands at 3061 and 1579 cm⁻¹ in the IR spectrum (Fig. 4) are assigned to the stretching and deformation modes ν(N—H) and δ(N—H), respectively, of –NH₂– in the ammonium group. The bands at 1675, 1375 and 1251 cm⁻¹ are attributed to the asymmetric and symmetric vibrations of the oxalate –CO₂ moiety while that at 795 cm⁻¹ corresponds to the deformation vibrations δ(C—O) (Sarr et al., 2018; Marinescu et al., 2002; Li et al., 2008). The frequencies of stretching vibrations of the oxalate group often show slight deviations owing to the different coordination modes. The bands at 2882 cm⁻¹ are assigned to the valence vibrations ν(C—H) and those at 1486 cm⁻¹ to the deformation vibrations δ(C—H).

Figure 4
The IR spectrum of the title compound.

The electronic spectrum of the title compound is shown in Fig. 5. In the ultraviolet region, only one strong absorption band with a shoulder is observed. Generally, only π→π*, n→π* and LMCT transitions can be observed in the ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) region. The σ→σ* transition requires an absorption of a photon with a wavelength which does not fall in the UV–Vis range. Thus, this strong absorption band at 320 nm (Fig. 5) may be assigned to ligand-metal ion charge transfer (LMCT) (Kane et al., 2016 ). However, as the ligand-based π→π* / n→π* transitions absorb in the same area as the LMCT transitions, we cannot exclude a possibility of superposition of these transitions (ligand-based and LMCT) owing to the form of the absorption band (Ford & Vogler, 1993 ; Filho et al., 2000 ). In the title compound, the Sn^IV atom is surrounded by electron rich ligands (chlorido and oxalato), and π→π* and n→π* transitions may result from the non-binding electron pairs present on chlorine atoms or oxygen atoms of oxalate (Wojciechowska et al., 2016 ).

Figure 5
The electronic spectrum of the title compound.

6. Refinement details

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. All H atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions and constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with a N—H distance of 0.91 Å, C_methyl—H = 0.98 Å and C_methine = 1.0 Å, and with U_iso(H) = 1.2U_eq (C,N) or 1.5U_eq(C_methyl). Three reflections were omitted from refinement because they were obstructed by the beam stop.

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	(C₆H₁₆N)₂[Sn(C₂ClO₄)₂]
M_r	570.02
Crystal system, space group	Monoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)	100
a, b, c (Å)	16.275 (8), 13.581 (6), 11.116 (4)
β (°)	98.40 (3)
V (Å³)	2430.7 (18)
Z	4
Radiation type	Mo Kα
μ (mm⁻¹)	1.31
Crystal size (mm)	0.56 × 0.30 × 0.22

Data collection
Diffractometer	Bruker D8 VENTURE
Absorption correction	Multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2015 )
T_min, T_max	0.626, 0.746
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	14360, 2800, 2597
R_int	0.023
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.650

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.023, 0.055, 1.28
No. of reflections	2800
No. of parameters	136
H-atom treatment	H-atom parameters constrained
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	1.01, −0.59
Computer programs: APEX3 and SAINT (Bruker, 2015), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ), SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015b ), and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009 ).

Supporting information

CCDC reference: 1833609

Crystal structure: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989019006030/wm5500sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989019006030/wm5500Isup2.hkl

checkCIF report

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX3 (Bruker, 2015); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2015); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2015); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009).

Bis(diisopropylammonium) cis-dichloridobis(oxalato-κ²O¹,O²)stannate(IV) top

Crystal data top

(C₆H₁₆N)₂[Sn(C₂ClO₄)₂]	F(000) = 1160
M_r = 570.02	D_x = 1.558 Mg m⁻³
Monoclinic, C2/c	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 16.275 (8) Å	Cell parameters from 7290 reflections
b = 13.581 (6) Å	θ = 3.0–27.5°
c = 11.116 (4) Å	µ = 1.31 mm⁻¹
β = 98.40 (3)°	T = 100 K
V = 2430.7 (18) Å³	Plate, clear light colourless
Z = 4	0.56 × 0.30 × 0.22 mm

Data collection top

Bruker D8 VENTURE diffractometer	2800 independent reflections
Radiation source: X-ray tube, Siemens KFF Mo 2K-90C	2597 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
TRIUMPH curved crystal monochromator	R_int = 0.023
Detector resolution: 1024 pixels mm^-1	θ_max = 27.5°, θ_min = 3.0°
φ and ω scans'	h = −20→21
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2015)	k = −17→17
T_min = 0.626, T_max = 0.746	l = −14→14
14360 measured reflections

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: full	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.023	H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F²) = 0.055	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.011P)² + 6.1885P] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
S = 1.28	(Δ/σ)_max = 0.002
2800 reflections	Δρ_max = 1.01 e Å⁻³
136 parameters	Δρ_min = −0.59 e Å⁻³
0 restraints

Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
Sn1	0.5000	0.67465 (2)	0.7500	0.01307 (6)
Cl1	0.55290 (4)	0.56066 (4)	0.89962 (5)	0.02556 (12)
O1	0.38232 (9)	0.69379 (11)	0.79635 (12)	0.0158 (3)
O2	0.31479 (8)	0.77413 (11)	0.92602 (12)	0.0165 (3)
O3	0.46345 (9)	0.85537 (11)	1.03026 (12)	0.0159 (3)
O4	0.52285 (9)	0.78744 (10)	0.88059 (12)	0.0147 (3)
C7	0.37835 (11)	0.75429 (14)	0.88463 (16)	0.0117 (3)
C8	0.46144 (11)	0.80483 (14)	0.93878 (17)	0.0121 (4)
N1	0.82801 (10)	0.66470 (12)	0.67738 (14)	0.0117 (3)
H1A	0.8640	0.6618	0.6220	0.014*
H1B	0.7824	0.6983	0.6421	0.014*
C1	0.80130 (13)	0.56088 (15)	0.70045 (19)	0.0180 (4)
H1	0.7608	0.5626	0.7599	0.022*
C2	0.87571 (16)	0.49960 (18)	0.7530 (2)	0.0317 (6)
H2A	0.8580	0.4317	0.7643	0.048*
H2B	0.9003	0.5271	0.8316	0.048*
H2C	0.9170	0.5004	0.6970	0.048*
C3	0.75809 (16)	0.52045 (17)	0.5802 (2)	0.0268 (5)
H3A	0.7113	0.5632	0.5490	0.040*
H3B	0.7376	0.4539	0.5926	0.040*
H3C	0.7975	0.5181	0.5215	0.040*
C4	0.86854 (12)	0.72450 (16)	0.78415 (18)	0.0163 (4)
H4	0.9228	0.6934	0.8176	0.020*
C5	0.88477 (14)	0.82664 (16)	0.7363 (2)	0.0225 (4)
H5A	0.9179	0.8209	0.6698	0.034*
H5B	0.9151	0.8662	0.8020	0.034*
H5C	0.8317	0.8586	0.7063	0.034*
C6	0.81368 (14)	0.72851 (18)	0.88350 (19)	0.0231 (5)
H6A	0.7582	0.7518	0.8491	0.035*
H6B	0.8380	0.7738	0.9476	0.035*
H6C	0.8094	0.6626	0.9179	0.035*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
Sn1	0.01120 (10)	0.01596 (10)	0.01279 (10)	0.000	0.00420 (6)	0.000
Cl1	0.0335 (3)	0.0221 (3)	0.0217 (2)	0.0028 (2)	0.0062 (2)	0.0098 (2)
O1	0.0111 (6)	0.0235 (7)	0.0134 (6)	−0.0049 (6)	0.0037 (5)	−0.0063 (6)
O2	0.0099 (6)	0.0262 (8)	0.0139 (7)	−0.0022 (6)	0.0035 (5)	−0.0046 (6)
O3	0.0147 (7)	0.0193 (7)	0.0130 (6)	−0.0013 (6)	0.0001 (5)	−0.0048 (5)
O4	0.0138 (7)	0.0166 (7)	0.0146 (7)	−0.0011 (5)	0.0056 (5)	−0.0016 (5)
C7	0.0112 (8)	0.0143 (9)	0.0095 (8)	−0.0013 (7)	0.0009 (7)	0.0026 (7)
C8	0.0088 (8)	0.0143 (9)	0.0125 (8)	−0.0005 (7)	−0.0008 (7)	0.0032 (7)
N1	0.0115 (7)	0.0134 (8)	0.0100 (7)	0.0003 (6)	0.0013 (6)	0.0021 (6)
C1	0.0200 (10)	0.0132 (9)	0.0211 (10)	−0.0016 (8)	0.0040 (8)	0.0049 (8)
C2	0.0323 (13)	0.0207 (11)	0.0403 (14)	0.0066 (10)	−0.0010 (11)	0.0129 (10)
C3	0.0327 (13)	0.0165 (10)	0.0312 (12)	−0.0058 (9)	0.0042 (10)	−0.0029 (9)
C4	0.0118 (9)	0.0227 (10)	0.0131 (9)	−0.0002 (8)	−0.0030 (7)	−0.0018 (8)
C5	0.0213 (11)	0.0208 (10)	0.0246 (11)	−0.0058 (9)	0.0006 (8)	−0.0019 (9)
C6	0.0250 (11)	0.0294 (12)	0.0144 (10)	0.0001 (9)	0.0016 (8)	−0.0015 (8)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

Sn1—Cl1	2.3422 (9)	C1—C3	1.519 (3)
Sn1—Cl1ⁱ	2.3422 (9)	C2—H2A	0.9800
Sn1—O1	2.0710 (16)	C2—H2B	0.9800
Sn1—O1ⁱ	2.0711 (16)	C2—H2C	0.9800
Sn1—O4ⁱ	2.1057 (15)	C3—H3A	0.9800
Sn1—O4	2.1058 (15)	C3—H3B	0.9800
O1—C7	1.289 (2)	C3—H3C	0.9800
O2—C7	1.222 (2)	C4—H4	1.0000
O3—C8	1.223 (2)	C4—C5	1.523 (3)
O4—C8	1.289 (2)	C4—C6	1.519 (3)
C7—C8	1.557 (3)	C5—H5A	0.9800
N1—H1A	0.9100	C5—H5B	0.9800
N1—H1B	0.9100	C5—H5C	0.9800
N1—C1	1.508 (3)	C6—H6A	0.9800
N1—C4	1.508 (2)	C6—H6B	0.9800
C1—H1	1.0000	C6—H6C	0.9800
C1—C2	1.514 (3)

Cl1ⁱ—Sn1—Cl1	97.26 (4)	C2—C1—C3	112.4 (2)
O1—Sn1—Cl1	99.42 (5)	C3—C1—H1	109.0
O1—Sn1—Cl1ⁱ	90.13 (5)	C1—C2—H2A	109.5
O1ⁱ—Sn1—Cl1	90.13 (5)	C1—C2—H2B	109.5
O1ⁱ—Sn1—Cl1ⁱ	99.42 (5)	C1—C2—H2C	109.5
O1—Sn1—O1ⁱ	165.59 (8)	H2A—C2—H2B	109.5
O1—Sn1—O4	79.27 (6)	H2A—C2—H2C	109.5
O1—Sn1—O4ⁱ	90.21 (6)	H2B—C2—H2C	109.5
O1ⁱ—Sn1—O4ⁱ	79.27 (6)	C1—C3—H3A	109.5
O1ⁱ—Sn1—O4	90.21 (6)	C1—C3—H3B	109.5
O4ⁱ—Sn1—Cl1	168.50 (4)	C1—C3—H3C	109.5
O4—Sn1—Cl1ⁱ	168.49 (4)	H3A—C3—H3B	109.5
O4ⁱ—Sn1—Cl1ⁱ	88.95 (5)	H3A—C3—H3C	109.5
O4—Sn1—Cl1	88.95 (5)	H3B—C3—H3C	109.5
O4ⁱ—Sn1—O4	86.66 (8)	N1—C4—H4	109.0
C7—O1—Sn1	114.87 (12)	N1—C4—C5	107.09 (16)
C8—O4—Sn1	114.04 (12)	N1—C4—C6	110.83 (17)
O1—C7—C8	115.98 (16)	C5—C4—H4	109.0
O2—C7—O1	124.51 (18)	C6—C4—H4	109.0
O2—C7—C8	119.50 (17)	C6—C4—C5	111.83 (18)
O3—C8—O4	126.25 (18)	C4—C5—H5A	109.5
O3—C8—C7	119.01 (17)	C4—C5—H5B	109.5
O4—C8—C7	114.74 (16)	C4—C5—H5C	109.5
H1A—N1—H1B	107.1	H5A—C5—H5B	109.5
C1—N1—H1A	107.7	H5A—C5—H5C	109.5
C1—N1—H1B	107.7	H5B—C5—H5C	109.5
C4—N1—H1A	107.7	C4—C6—H6A	109.5
C4—N1—H1B	107.7	C4—C6—H6B	109.5
C4—N1—C1	118.25 (15)	C4—C6—H6C	109.5
N1—C1—H1	109.0	H6A—C6—H6B	109.5
N1—C1—C2	110.20 (18)	H6A—C6—H6C	109.5
N1—C1—C3	107.23 (16)	H6B—C6—H6C	109.5
C2—C1—H1	109.0

Sn1—O1—C7—O2	−178.95 (15)	O2—C7—C8—O3	7.8 (3)
Sn1—O1—C7—C8	1.7 (2)	O2—C7—C8—O4	−172.75 (17)
Sn1—O4—C8—O3	168.18 (16)	C1—N1—C4—C5	−177.16 (17)
Sn1—O4—C8—C7	−11.23 (19)	C1—N1—C4—C6	−54.9 (2)
O1—C7—C8—O3	−172.83 (17)	C4—N1—C1—C2	−60.8 (2)
O1—C7—C8—O4	6.6 (2)	C4—N1—C1—C3	176.56 (17)

Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, y, −z+3/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
N1—H1A···O3ⁱⁱ	0.91	2.05	2.943 (2)	167
N1—H1B···O2ⁱ	0.91	1.95	2.855 (2)	177

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y, −z+3/2; (ii) x+1/2, −y+3/2, z−1/2.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Université Cheikh Anta Diop Dakar-Sénégal, the Laboratoire de Chimie et de Physique des Matériaux (LCPM) de l'Université Assane Seck de Ziguinchor, Sénégal and the ICMUB-UMR 6302, 9, avenue Alain Savary 21000 Dijon-France for financial support. All measurements were performed in the institutes quoted above. The authors also acknowledge the CNRS-Université de Strasbourg, France, through collaboration with Frederic Melin.

References

Bruker (2015). APEX3, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Christie, A. D., Howie, R. A. & Moser, W. (1979). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 36, L447–L448. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Diop, T., Diop, L. & Michaud, F. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, m696. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Filho, D. D. A. B., Filho, P. P. A., Alves, O. L. & Franco, D. W. (2000). J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 18, 259–267. Google Scholar
Ford, P. C. & Vogler, A. (1993). Acc. Chem. Res. 26, 220–226. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kane, C. H., Tinguiano, D., Tamboura, F. B., Thiam, I. E., Barry, A. H., Gaye, M. & Retailleau, P. (2016). Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 30, 101–110. CAS Google Scholar
Kapoor, R. N., Guillory, P., Schulte, L., Cervantes-Lee, F., Haiduc, I., Parkanyi, L. & Pannell, K. H. (2005). Appl. Organomet. Chem. 19, 510–517. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Li, W., Jia, H. P., Ju, Z. F. & Zhang, J. (2008). Dalton Trans. pp. 5350–5357. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Marinescu, G., Lescouëzec, R., Armentano, D., De Munno, G., Andruh, M., Uriel, S., Llusar, R., Lloret, F. & Julve, M. (2002). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 336, 46–54. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Miskelly, G. M., Clark, C. R., Simpson, J. & Buckingham, D. A. (1983). Inorg. Chem. 22, 3237–3241. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Ng, S. W. & Kumar Das, V. G. (1993). J. Organomet. Chem. 456, 175–179. CAS Google Scholar
Reichelt, M. & Reuter, H. (2014). Acta Cryst. E70, m133. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Rocamora-Reverte, L., Carrasco-García, E., Ceballos-Torres, J., Prashar, S., Kaluđerović, G. N., Ferragut, J. A. & Gómez-Ruiz, S. (2012). ChemMedChem, 7, 301–310. Web of Science CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sarr, B., Diop, C. A. K., Sidibé, M. & Rousselin, Y. (2018). Acta Cryst. E74, 502–504. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sarr, M., Diallo, W., Diasse-Sarr, A., Plasseraud, L. & Cattey, H. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, m581–m582. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Skapski, A. C., Guerchais, J.-E. & Calves, J.-Y. (1974). C. R. Acad. Sci. Ser. C Chim, 278, 1377–1379. CAS Google Scholar
Sow, Y., Diop, L., Molloy, K. C. & Kociok-Kohn, G. (2012). Acta Cryst. E68, m1337. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sow, Y., Diop, L., Molloy, K. C. & Kociok-Köhn, G. (2013). Acta Cryst. E69, m106–m107. CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Świtlicka-Olszewska, A., Machura, B., Mroziński, J., Kalińska, B., Kruszynski, R. & Penkala, M. (2014). New J. Chem. 38, 1611–1626. Google Scholar
Wojciechowska, A., Janczak, J., Rojek, T., Gorzsas, A., Malik-Gajewska, M. & Duczmal, D. (2016). J. Coord. Chem. 69, 1–15. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.