research communications
(E)-6,6′-(Diazene-1,2-diyl)bis(1,10-phenanthrolin-5-ol) trichloromethane disolvate: a superconjugated ligand
aDepartment of Chemistry, Maynooth University, Co. Kildare, Ireland, bThe Centre for Biomimetic & Therapeutic Research, Focas Research Institute, Technological University Dublin, City Campus, Camden Row, Dublin 8, Ireland, cDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Southern Denmark, Canpusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark, and dSchool of Chemical Sciences, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland
*Correspondence e-mail: denise.rooney@mu.ie
Phenanthroline ligands are important metal-binding molecules which have been extensively researched for applications in both material science and medicinal chemistry. Azobenzene and its derivatives have received significant attention because of their ability to be reversibly switched between the E and Z forms and so could have applications in optical memory and logic devices or as molecular machines. Herein we report the formation and of a highly unusual novel diazo-diphenanthroline compound, C24H14N6O2·2CHCl3.
Keywords: crystal structure; diazo; phenanthroline; superconjugated ligand.
CCDC reference: 1937969
1. Chemical context
The chemical versatility of 1,10-phenanthroline (phen), its substituted derivatives and corresponding metal complexes (Bencini & Lippolis, 2010) is exemplified by their uses as organic light-emitting diodes (OLED)/electroluminescent display and solid-state lighting materials (Li et al., 2009), fluorescence molecular probes and imaging agents (Haraga et al., 2018), ion sensors (Zheng et al., 2012), solar energy converters (Freitag et al., 2016), anti-cancer and antimicrobial cytotoxins (McCann et al., 2012), DNA/RNA binding/cleavage (Kellett et al., 2011), enzyme inhibitors (Zhu et al., 2015), biomimetics (Casey et al., 1994) and catalysts (Lu et al., 2015). Given the resourcefulness of phenanthrolines, there is a continuing demand for new molecules containing this structural motif.
Herein, we detail the preparation and structural characterization of the purple diazo-diphenanthroline compound, (E)-6,6′-(diazene-1,2-diyl)bis(1,10-phenanthrolin-5-ol) (1), which was isolated in low yield from the reaction between 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione (phendione) and isonicotinic acid hydrazide (isoniazid). Compound 1 crystallizes with two trichloromethane solvate molecules (1·2CHCl3). The fully conjugated bis-phenanthroline molecule 1 is expected to offer exciting new physical and chemical properties as a stand-alone organic molecule, and it will also birth a plethora of interesting metal coordination complexes as a consequence of the dual N,N′-1,10-phenanthroline chelating moieties situated on the opposite ends of the molecule.
2. Structural commentary
Compound 1·2CHCl3 crystallizes with two molecules of trichloromethane solvate per diazo-diphenanthroline (Fig. 1). The molecule lies on a centre of symmetry and is essentially planar, the r.m.s. deviation from the plane of the atoms in the ring system is 0.259 Å. The molecules lie parallel to the (5 7 15) or (5 14) planes. There is a hydrogen bond between the alcohol and the diazo linker [O1⋯N2 = 2.540 (3) Å under −x + 2, −y + 1, −z + 1, Table 1] and the trichloromethane molecule is oriented by a bifurcated C—H⋯·N interaction with the phenanthroline moiety [3.219 (3) and 3.136 (4) Å to N1 and N3, respectively]. The carbon atom of the trichloromethane molecule (C21) is 1.045 (3) Å from the mean plane of 1·2CHCl3. There are 40 examples in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.40, update of May 2019; Groom et al., 2016) showing similar interactions between trichloromethane and 1,10-phenanthroline derivatives and the geometry for 1·2CHCl3 is typical of the group [mean Cl3CH⋯·N = 3.18 (5) Å].
|
The bond lengths indicate some delocalization through the central part of the molecule. The C6—O1and C5—N2 bonds are short [1.318 (3) and 1.376 (3) Å, respectively] and the N=N bond, at 1.316 (4) Å, is significantly longer than in most free diazo molecules [mean of 1.24 (4) Å for 2730 CSD entries].
3. Supramolecular features
Fig. 2 shows the unit-cell packing, the molecules lie parallel to the (5 7 15) or (5 14) planes with a mean interplanar distance of 3.228 (2) Å (under 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z) and the axis of the stack runs parallel to the a axis. The shortest ring centroid–centroid distance is 3.5154 (15) Å between the C6 rings; however, there is a more direct overlap between the diazo group and an imine group in the next layer (ca 3.246 Å between the mid-point of the N=N bond and the mid-point of the C11=N3 bond under 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z) (Fig. 3). The most notable interactions between stacks are type 1 R—Cl⋯·Cl—R packing interactions (Mukherjee et al., 2014; Cavallo et al., 2016), the shortest Cl⋯Cl distance being 3.5353 (11) Å for Cl1⋯·Cl3 under −1 + x, y, z.
4. Database survey
There are three published examples of molecules containing the 2,2′-dihydroxyazobenzene core (Bougueria et al., 2014; Evangelio et al., 2008; Schilde et al., 1994) and all of these are significantly less delocalized than 1·2CHCl3.
5. Spectroscopy studies of 1 in solution
Compound 1 has a very low solubility in all organic solvents investigated (CH3Cl, CH2Cl2, DMSO, CH3CN and alcohols). UV/vis spectra of 1·2CHCl3 recorded in ethanol, methanol, CHCl3 and CH2Cl2 are given in Fig. 4. Compound 1 exhibits significant solvatochromism showing a broad band in CHCl3 and CH2Cl2 with λmax at 543 nm. This band undergoes a and separates into two bands in the with λmax values at 643 nm and 600 nm in ethanol and at 636 nm and 591 nm in methanol. No accurate measurement of the extinction coefficient could be made as 1 was not fully soluble in the solvents and precipitation from the solvent occurred upon standing. The solubility of 1 was so low that only a very poorly resolved 1H NMR of the compound was obtained in d4-methanol showing a series of peaks in the region expected for the phenanthroline H-atom signals and no definitive assignments of the peaks could be made. Interestingly, 1 was more soluble in strongly acidic solutions due to the protonation of one or more of the N atoms. Compound 1 dissolved in CF3COOD to form a bright-red solution. Six signals are observed in the 1H NMR spectrum in the region associated with the phenanthroline peaks. This finding is consistent with a compound which has a centre of symmetry, as found for the and suggests that at room temperature 1 remains in the E form in this solvent.
6. Synthesis and crystallization
The mechanism to form 1 from the reaction mixture is unclear; however, the formation of isonicotinic acid N′-(pyridine-4-carbonyl)-hydrazide (2) from the mixture is an indication that radical chemistry is occurring. Isoniazid is well known to react to form radical species and these radicals are important in its role as an anti-tuberculosis drug (Timmins et al. 2006). Significantly one LC–MS study has shown that isoniazid will photo-degrade to form 2 (Fig. 5) and radical intermediates are proposed in its formation (Bhutani, 2007). Attempts were made to try to favour the formation of 1 using UV irradiation and the radical initiators azobisisobutyronitrile and 2,2′-azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride but these were unsuccessful. However, although the reaction to form 1 was low yielding, attempts to make 1 by reaction of 6-amino-1,10-phenanthrolin-5-ol and 6-nitroso-1,10-phenananthrolin-5-ol using known conditions to form (Zhao et al. 2011) did not form the desired product. Studies are ongoing to improve the yield of the reaction to form 1.
Phendione (0.210 g, 1.000 mmol) was added to solution of isoniazid (0.137 g, 1.000 mmol) in EtOH (25 cm3). p-Tolouenesulfonic acid (10%, 0.02 g) was added and the solution refluxed for 6 h. The resulting suspension was filtered whilst hot and the filtrate allowed to stand in the dark overnight. Precipitated yellow (Z)-N′-(6-oxo-1,10-phenanthrolin-5(6H) ylidene)isonicotinohydrazide (0.263 g, 0.799 mmol, 80%) was filtered off and the bright-orange filtrate was concentrated to ca 10 cm3 using rotary evaporation and then allowed to stand in the dark. Over a period of four weeks, the bright-orange filtrate changed to a dark-green suspension. This mixture was heated to reflux and filtered whilst hot to give a green filtrate (see below) and a dark-purple powder. The powder was dissolved in CHCl3 and allowed to crystallize over several days to produce dark-purple crystals of (E)-6,6′-(diazene-1,2-diyl)bis(1,10-phenanthrolin-5-ol) trichloromethane disolvate (1·2CHCl3) (0.026 g, 0.039 mmol, 6.2% based on isoniazid starting material). Upon leaving the above green filtrate to evaporate further white isonicotinic acid N′-(pyridine-4-carbonyl)-hydrazide (compound 2) precipitated. The supernatent was decanted off and the solid dissolved in hot acetone. This colourless solution was evaporated to dryness on a rotary evaporator to give 2 (0.015 g, 0.062 mmol, 12.4% based on isoniazid starting material).
Compound 1: IR (ATR, cm−1) (1.2CHCl3): 3065, 2108, 1583, 1568, 1500, 1472, 1415, 1338, 1284, 1227, 1162, 1027, 795, 739, 717. 1H NMR (protonated-1) (CF3COOD, 500 MHz): δ 9.60 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), PhenH 9.56 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, PhenH), 9.47 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H, PhenH), 9.37 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H, PhenH), 8.57 (dd, J = 8.5, 5.0 Hz, 2H, PhenH), 8.38 (dd, J = 8.5, 5.0 Hz, 2H, PhenH), 4.12 (s, 2H, OH). Elemental analysis calculated for 1·2CHCl3 (C26H16Cl6N6O2, 657.15 g mol−1): C 47.52, H 2.45, N 12.79%; found: C 47.73, H 2.52, N 12.77%.
Compound 2 has been previously reported (Quiroga et al., 2008; Bhutani et al., 2007) and the characterization data given are consistent with the data recorded in the present study.
Compound 2: IR (KBr, cm−1) 3435, 3210, 3045, 1682, 1642, 1546, 1489, 1406, 1299, 838, 751. 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz): δ 8.80 (d, J = 5 Hz, 2H), 7.42 (d, J = 5 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz): δ 165.6 (C=O), 150.0 (PyrC), 140.5 (PyrC), 121.8 (PyrC). MS: Calculated m/z for C12H10N4O2: (M + H)+ 243.0877; found: (M + H)+ 243.0882; difference (ppm): 2.15.
7. Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure . The C-bound H atoms were included in calculated positions and treated as riding, with C—H = 0.95–1.00 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C) for methyl H atoms or 1.2Ueq(C) otherwise. The H atom (H1A) bonded to oxygen was located in a difference-Fourier map and its coordinates were refined with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O).
details are summarized in Table 2Supporting information
CCDC reference: 1937969
https://doi.org/10.1107/S205698901900954X/jj2213sup1.cif
contains datablock I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S205698901900954X/jj2213Isup2.hkl
Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S205698901900954X/jj2213Isup3.cml
Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2010); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2010); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2010); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT (Sheldrick 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).C24H14N6O2·2CHCl3 | F(000) = 664 |
Mr = 657.15 | Dx = 1.604 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 5.9406 (7) Å | Cell parameters from 5155 reflections |
b = 18.856 (2) Å | θ = 2.7–26.1° |
c = 12.2375 (16) Å | µ = 0.67 mm−1 |
β = 96.863 (4)° | T = 150 K |
V = 1361.0 (3) Å3 | Lath, purple |
Z = 2 | 0.43 × 0.05 × 0.04 mm |
Bruker–Nonius X8 APEXII CCD diffractometer | 2732 independent reflections |
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed-tube | 2068 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Detector resolution: 9.1 pixels mm-1 | Rint = 0.045 |
thin–slice ω and φ scans | θmax = 26.2°, θmin = 2.7° |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2012) | h = −5→7 |
Tmin = 0.657, Tmax = 0.745 | k = −23→23 |
18529 measured reflections | l = −15→14 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: dual |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.044 | Hydrogen site location: mixed |
wR(F2) = 0.111 | Heteroxyz |
S = 1.02 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0444P)2 + 1.8407P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
2732 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
184 parameters | Δρmax = 0.87 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.59 e Å−3 |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
N1 | 0.3174 (4) | 0.63628 (11) | 0.66898 (18) | 0.0216 (5) | |
C1 | 0.3648 (5) | 0.69741 (14) | 0.6234 (2) | 0.0240 (6) | |
H1 | 0.269904 | 0.736919 | 0.632910 | 0.029* | |
C2 | 0.5456 (5) | 0.70706 (14) | 0.5623 (2) | 0.0255 (6) | |
H2 | 0.572645 | 0.752054 | 0.531450 | 0.031* | |
C3 | 0.6846 (4) | 0.65044 (14) | 0.5473 (2) | 0.0219 (6) | |
H3 | 0.810516 | 0.656051 | 0.507047 | 0.026* | |
C4 | 0.6383 (4) | 0.58421 (13) | 0.5923 (2) | 0.0174 (5) | |
C5 | 0.7702 (4) | 0.52078 (13) | 0.5757 (2) | 0.0177 (5) | |
N2 | 0.9396 (3) | 0.52817 (11) | 0.50912 (17) | 0.0195 (5) | |
C6 | 0.7175 (4) | 0.45623 (14) | 0.6231 (2) | 0.0195 (5) | |
O1 | 0.8303 (3) | 0.39726 (10) | 0.61010 (16) | 0.0246 (4) | |
H1A | 0.937 (6) | 0.4088 (17) | 0.569 (3) | 0.037* | |
C7 | 0.5313 (4) | 0.45226 (13) | 0.6889 (2) | 0.0191 (5) | |
C8 | 0.4726 (5) | 0.38783 (14) | 0.7366 (2) | 0.0239 (6) | |
H8 | 0.554738 | 0.345644 | 0.726050 | 0.029* | |
C9 | 0.2948 (5) | 0.38714 (15) | 0.7985 (2) | 0.0274 (6) | |
H9 | 0.251833 | 0.344474 | 0.831710 | 0.033* | |
C10 | 0.1781 (5) | 0.45015 (15) | 0.8118 (2) | 0.0253 (6) | |
H10 | 0.057433 | 0.449191 | 0.856178 | 0.030* | |
N3 | 0.2257 (4) | 0.51143 (12) | 0.76615 (18) | 0.0224 (5) | |
C11 | 0.4006 (4) | 0.51294 (13) | 0.7050 (2) | 0.0182 (5) | |
C12 | 0.4522 (4) | 0.58002 (13) | 0.6541 (2) | 0.0185 (5) | |
C21 | 0.0382 (5) | 0.64497 (15) | 0.8784 (2) | 0.0271 (6) | |
H21 | 0.087592 | 0.621547 | 0.811921 | 0.032* | |
Cl1 | −0.23375 (13) | 0.61485 (6) | 0.89683 (7) | 0.0493 (3) | |
Cl2 | 0.03861 (18) | 0.73803 (4) | 0.85952 (7) | 0.0508 (3) | |
Cl3 | 0.23081 (12) | 0.62261 (4) | 0.99506 (6) | 0.0333 (2) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
N1 | 0.0234 (11) | 0.0211 (12) | 0.0208 (12) | 0.0047 (9) | 0.0050 (9) | −0.0007 (9) |
C1 | 0.0290 (14) | 0.0208 (15) | 0.0229 (14) | 0.0070 (11) | 0.0065 (11) | −0.0003 (11) |
C2 | 0.0330 (15) | 0.0159 (13) | 0.0279 (15) | 0.0000 (11) | 0.0054 (12) | 0.0012 (11) |
C3 | 0.0231 (13) | 0.0216 (14) | 0.0219 (14) | −0.0011 (11) | 0.0064 (11) | −0.0016 (11) |
C4 | 0.0192 (13) | 0.0169 (13) | 0.0160 (12) | 0.0001 (10) | 0.0008 (10) | −0.0016 (10) |
C5 | 0.0158 (12) | 0.0196 (13) | 0.0169 (13) | 0.0011 (10) | −0.0011 (10) | −0.0021 (10) |
N2 | 0.0180 (11) | 0.0213 (11) | 0.0193 (11) | 0.0023 (8) | 0.0020 (9) | −0.0036 (9) |
C6 | 0.0192 (13) | 0.0203 (14) | 0.0180 (13) | 0.0023 (10) | −0.0011 (10) | −0.0020 (10) |
O1 | 0.0258 (10) | 0.0197 (10) | 0.0293 (11) | 0.0053 (8) | 0.0072 (8) | 0.0007 (8) |
C7 | 0.0212 (13) | 0.0203 (13) | 0.0151 (13) | 0.0003 (10) | −0.0007 (10) | 0.0007 (10) |
C8 | 0.0277 (14) | 0.0199 (14) | 0.0236 (14) | 0.0023 (11) | 0.0004 (11) | 0.0027 (11) |
C9 | 0.0319 (15) | 0.0274 (15) | 0.0230 (14) | −0.0046 (12) | 0.0036 (12) | 0.0063 (12) |
C10 | 0.0244 (14) | 0.0290 (15) | 0.0236 (14) | −0.0027 (11) | 0.0077 (11) | 0.0032 (12) |
N3 | 0.0235 (11) | 0.0250 (12) | 0.0190 (11) | −0.0009 (9) | 0.0039 (9) | 0.0005 (9) |
C11 | 0.0207 (13) | 0.0198 (13) | 0.0141 (12) | 0.0010 (10) | 0.0016 (10) | −0.0020 (10) |
C12 | 0.0199 (13) | 0.0196 (13) | 0.0156 (13) | 0.0008 (10) | 0.0008 (10) | −0.0015 (10) |
C21 | 0.0290 (15) | 0.0290 (16) | 0.0242 (15) | 0.0014 (12) | 0.0077 (12) | −0.0021 (12) |
Cl1 | 0.0258 (4) | 0.0875 (7) | 0.0346 (5) | −0.0121 (4) | 0.0037 (3) | −0.0095 (4) |
Cl2 | 0.0818 (7) | 0.0295 (4) | 0.0438 (5) | 0.0156 (4) | 0.0196 (5) | 0.0009 (4) |
Cl3 | 0.0273 (4) | 0.0379 (4) | 0.0339 (4) | −0.0051 (3) | 0.0008 (3) | 0.0002 (3) |
N1—C1 | 1.326 (3) | O1—H1A | 0.88 (3) |
N1—C12 | 1.355 (3) | C7—C11 | 1.409 (4) |
C1—C2 | 1.392 (4) | C7—C8 | 1.409 (4) |
C1—H1 | 0.9500 | C8—C9 | 1.371 (4) |
C2—C3 | 1.375 (4) | C8—H8 | 0.9500 |
C2—H2 | 0.9500 | C9—C10 | 1.395 (4) |
C3—C4 | 1.405 (4) | C9—H9 | 0.9500 |
C3—H3 | 0.9500 | C10—N3 | 1.328 (3) |
C4—C12 | 1.414 (3) | C10—H10 | 0.9500 |
C4—C5 | 1.457 (3) | N3—C11 | 1.352 (3) |
C5—N2 | 1.376 (3) | C11—C12 | 1.459 (4) |
C5—C6 | 1.400 (4) | C21—Cl1 | 1.752 (3) |
N2—N2i | 1.316 (4) | C21—Cl2 | 1.770 (3) |
C6—O1 | 1.318 (3) | C21—Cl3 | 1.771 (3) |
C6—C7 | 1.446 (4) | C21—H21 | 1.0000 |
C1—N1—C12 | 117.7 (2) | C8—C7—C6 | 121.2 (2) |
N1—C1—C2 | 123.8 (2) | C9—C8—C7 | 118.8 (2) |
N1—C1—H1 | 118.1 | C9—C8—H8 | 120.6 |
C2—C1—H1 | 118.1 | C7—C8—H8 | 120.6 |
C3—C2—C1 | 118.9 (3) | C8—C9—C10 | 118.9 (3) |
C3—C2—H2 | 120.5 | C8—C9—H9 | 120.6 |
C1—C2—H2 | 120.5 | C10—C9—H9 | 120.6 |
C2—C3—C4 | 119.3 (2) | N3—C10—C9 | 123.9 (2) |
C2—C3—H3 | 120.3 | N3—C10—H10 | 118.0 |
C4—C3—H3 | 120.3 | C9—C10—H10 | 118.0 |
C3—C4—C12 | 117.4 (2) | C10—N3—C11 | 117.9 (2) |
C3—C4—C5 | 122.8 (2) | N3—C11—C7 | 122.2 (2) |
C12—C4—C5 | 119.8 (2) | N3—C11—C12 | 118.0 (2) |
N2—C5—C6 | 123.3 (2) | C7—C11—C12 | 119.8 (2) |
N2—C5—C4 | 116.3 (2) | N1—C12—C4 | 122.7 (2) |
C6—C5—C4 | 120.4 (2) | N1—C12—C11 | 117.6 (2) |
N2i—N2—C5 | 118.1 (3) | C4—C12—C11 | 119.6 (2) |
O1—C6—C5 | 122.8 (2) | Cl1—C21—Cl2 | 110.73 (16) |
O1—C6—C7 | 117.2 (2) | Cl1—C21—Cl3 | 109.64 (15) |
C5—C6—C7 | 120.0 (2) | Cl2—C21—Cl3 | 109.29 (16) |
C6—O1—H1A | 106 (2) | Cl1—C21—H21 | 109.1 |
C11—C7—C8 | 118.3 (2) | Cl2—C21—H21 | 109.1 |
C11—C7—C6 | 120.4 (2) | Cl3—C21—H21 | 109.1 |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O1—H1A···N2i | 0.88 (3) | 1.74 (3) | 2.540 (3) | 149 (3) |
C21—H21···N1 | 1.00 | 2.36 | 3.219 (3) | 143 |
C21—H21···N3 | 1.00 | 2.33 | 3.136 (4) | 137 |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1. |
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge Maynooth University for a John and Pat Hume Scholarship for MA.
Funding information
Funding for this research was provided by: National University of Ireland, Maynooth Hume Scholarship (scholarship to Muhib Ahmed).
References
Bencini, A. & Lippolis, V. (2010). Coord. Chem. Rev. 254, 2096–2180. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bhutani, H., Singh, S., Vir, S., Bhutani, K. K., Kumar, R., Chakraborti, A. K. & Jindal, K. C. (2007). J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 43, 1213–1220. CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Bougueria, H., Mili, A., Benosmane, A., Bouchoul, A. el kader & Bouaoud, S. (2014). Acta Cryst. E70, o225. Google Scholar
Bruker (2010). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Casey, M. T., McCann, M., Devereux, M., Curran, M., Cardin, C., Convery, M., Quillet, V. & Harding, C. (1994). J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. pp. 2643–2645. CrossRef Google Scholar
Cavallo, G., Metrangolo, P., Milani, R., Pilati, T., Priimagi, A., Resnati, G. & Terraneo, G. (2016). Chem. Rev. 116, 2478–2601. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Evangelio, E., Saiz-Poseu, J., Maspoch, D., Wurst, K., Busque, F. & Ruiz-Molina, D. (2008). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 14, 2278–2285. CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Freitag, M., Giordano, F., Yang, W., Pazoki, M., Hao, Y., Zietz, B., Grätzel, M., Hagfeldt, A. & Boschloo, G. (2016). J. Phys. Chem. C, 120, 9595–9603. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Haraga, T., Ouchi, K., Sato, Y., Hoshino, H., Tanaka, R., Fujihara, T., Kurokawa, H., Shibukawa, M., Ishimori, K. I., Kameo, Y. & Saito, S. (2018). Anal. Chim. Acta, 1032, 188–196. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kellett, A., O'Connor, M., McCann, M., McNamara, M., Lynch, P., Rosair, G., McKee, V., Creaven, B., Walsh, M., McClean, S., Foltyn, A., O'Shea, D., Howe, O. & Devereux, M. (2011). Dalton Trans. 40, 1024–1027. CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li, Y.-J., Sasabe, H., Su, S.-J., Tanaka, D., Takeda, T., Pu, Y.-J. & Kido, J. (2009). Chem. Lett. 38, 712–713. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Lu, Y., Wang, X., Wang, M., Kong, L. & Zhao, J. (2015). Electrochim. Acta, 180, 86–95. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
McCann, M., Santos, A., da Silva, B., Romanos, M., Pyrrho, A., Devereux, M., Kavanagh, K., Fichtner, I. & Kellett, A. (2012). Toxicol. Res. 1, 47–54. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Mukherjee, A., Tothadi, S. & Desiraju, G. R. (2014). Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 2514–2524. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Quiroga, J., Portilla, J., Abonía, R., Insuasty, B., Nogueras, M. & Cobo, J. (2008). Tetrahedron Lett. 49, 5943–5945. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Schilde, U., Hefele, H., Ludwig, E. & Uhlemann, E. (1994). Cryst. Res. Technol. 29, 393–396. CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2012). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Timmins, G. S. & Deretic, V. (2006). Mol. Microbiol. 62, 1220–1227. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Zhao, R., Tan, C., Xie, Y., Gao, C., Liu, H. & Jiang, Y. (2011). Tetrahedron Lett. 52, 3805–3809. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Zheng, Y., Tan, C., Drummen, G. P. & Wang, Q. (2012). Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 96, 387–394. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhu, Y., Liao, Y., Zhang, L. & Bai, X. (2015). PCT Int. Appl. WO 2015154716 A1. Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.