research communications
and Hirshfeld surface analysis of 2,6-diiodo-4-nitrotoluene and 2,4,6-tribromotoluene
aLaboratoire de Cristallographie, Département de Physique, Université Mentouri-Constantine, 25000 Constantine, Algeria, and bUMR 6226 CNRS–Université Rennes 1 `Sciences Chimiques de Rennes', Equipe `Matière Condensée et Systèmes Electroactifs', Bâtiment 10C Campus de Beaulieu, 263 Avenue du Général Leclerc, F-35042 Rennes, France
*Correspondence e-mail: medjroubi-m@umc.edu.dz
The title compounds, 2,6-diiodo-4-nitrotoluene (DINT, C7H5I2NO2) and 2,4,6-tribromotoluene (TBT, C7H5Br3,), are trisubstituted toluene molecules. Both molecules are planar, only the H atoms of the methyl group, and the nitro group in DINT, deviate significantly from the plane of the benzene ring. In the crystals of both compounds, molecules stack in columns up the shortest crystallographic axis, viz. the a axis in DINT and the b axis in TBT. In the crystal of DINT, molecules are linked via short N—O⋯I contacts, forming chains along [100]. In TBT, molecules are linked by C—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds, forming chains along [010]. Hirshfeld surface analysis was used to explore the intermolecular contacts in the crystals of both DINT and TBT.
1. Chemical context
In order to understand the methyl radical behaviour of benzene molecules substituted by halogens and methyl groups, we have studied a number of halogenomesitylenes, such as triiodomesitylene (TIM; Boudjada et al., 2001), trichloromesitylene (TCM; Tazi et al., 1995), tribromomesitylene (TBM; Boudjada et al., 1999) and dibromomesitylene (DBM; Hernandez et al., 2003). In the solid state of these halogeno-methyl-benzene (HMB) compounds, the between the methyl group and the halogen atoms results in small out-of -plane deformations of the heavy atoms. In spite of the small amplitudes of the deformation, the impact on the rotational potential of the methyl group is considerable because of the contribution of the neighbouring halogen atoms on the methyl groups as observed in these planar structures. This study has now been extended to understand and identify the methyl-group behaviour of halogeno-toluene molecules, and we report herein on the crystal and molecular structures of the title compounds, 2,6-diiodo-4-nitrotoluene (DINT; 1,3-diiodo-2-methyl-5-nitrobenzene) and 2,4,6-tribromotoluene (TBT; 1,3,5-tribromo-2-methyl-benzene). Hirshfeld surface analysis was used to explore the intermolecular contacts in the crystals of both compounds.
2. Structural commentary
The molecular structure of DINT is illustrated in Fig. 1, and that of TBT in Fig. 2. The structures of the title compounds are compared with those of the dichloronitrotoluene (DCNT; Medjroubi et al., 2017) and dibromonitrotoluene (DBNT; Medjroubi et al., 2016) analogues, illustrated in Fig. 3.
In DBNT, the methyl group exhibits rotational disorder about the Car—Cme axis. As in DCNT, the methyl group of DINT does not present any disorder. Hence, no significant of the methyl group by the ortho halogen atoms is observed. The longest bond lengths Car—Car are adjacent to the Car—Cme bond with an average value of 1.405 (4) Å. The bond-length values are close to those found in the literature. Moreover, in the of DINT, the methyl group has a C—H bond perpendicular to the mean plane with a torsion angle C2—C1—C7—H7A = 90.0°, which has already previously been reported in the literature. The intermolecular N1—O⋯I [3.115 (3) Å] interactions are competing to ensure cohesion in the crystal, see Fig. 4. Atom I2 bonded to the atom C6, with the C1—C6—I2 angle of 121.7 (3)° being greater than the angle C5—C6—I2 [116.1 (2)°] located on the other side of the C6—I2 bond (Fig. 1). The aromatic ring is planar in DINT. The methyl C atom, the I atoms and the N atom of the nitro substituent, lie extremely close to the plane of the benzene ring; the deviations are 0.001 (1) Å for the methyl C atom, 0.097 (3) and −0.097 (3) Å for the two I atoms, −0.011 (2) Å for the nitro N atom, whereas for the oxygen atoms, which are located on either side of the mean plane, the deviations are 0.293 (3) and −0.283 (3) Å. In the crystal of DCNT, molecules are linked by weak C—H⋯O and C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, forming layers parallel to the ab plane Fig. 5 (Medjroubi et al., 2017).
The molecular structure of TBT is illustrated in Fig. 2. The structural study did not reveal any disorder and the intramolecular interaction ensuring the cohesion in the crystal is C—Br⋯ H7B (2.61 Å) as seen in Fig. 6 and Table 1. This conformation produces a significant between the hydrogen atoms of the methyl group and atom Br2 bonded to atom C6 with an angle C1—C6—Br3 = 119.8 (2)°, which is clearly greater than the angle C5—C6—Br3 = 116.5 (2)° located on the other side of the C6—Br1 bond. This is the same case for the exocyclic angles C6—C1—C7 = 121.9 (3)° and C2—C1—C7 = 123.6 (3)° located on either side of the C1—C7 bond. As found in DINT and DCNT, the longest Car—Car bond lengths are adjacent to the Car–Cme bond (Fig. 2). The methyl C atom C7 is displaced from the benzene ring by −0.005 (1) Å, while the Br atoms lie almost in the plane of the benzene ring [deviations are 0.003 (3) Å for atoms Br1 and Br3 and −0.012 (3) Å for atom Br2]. The CH3 group presents an eclipsed C—H bond with the mean plane of the molecule. A difference of 2° is found between the exocyclic angles Car— Car—Cme, which explains the importance of the interaction of this eclipsed bond with atom Br3. The endocyclic angle in front of the methyl group is equal to 116.6 (3)° for DINT, 115.7 (2)° for DCNT (Medjroubi et al., 2017), 114.7 (3)° for DBNT (Medjroubi et al., 2016) and 114.5 (3)° for TBT. The variation of this angle is very sensitive to the substitution of the halogen atoms surrounding the methyl groups of these different compounds.
|
3. Supramolecular features
In the crystal of DINT, the molecules are assembled into columns along the a-axis direction, the shortest crystallographic axis. Molecules are linked by O⋯I intermolecular interactions, with distance I2⋯O1i = 3.12 (1) Å [symmetry code (i): x − 1, −y + , z + ], leading to the formation of chains along the [20] direction, see Fig. 4.
In the crystal of TBT, molecules stack in columns along the b-axis direction, again the shortest crystallographic axis. Molecules are linked by weak Br⋯Br interactions [Br1⋯Br3ii = 3.5921 (5) Å; symmetry code (ii): x + , −y + , z + ], forming chains along the [101] direction. Br⋯H short contacts are also present in the crystal of TBT [Br1⋯H7Cii = 3.5921 (5) Å; symmetry code (iii): x, −1 + y, z].
4. Analysis of the Hirshfeld surfaces of DINT and TBT
Additional insight into the intermolecular interactions was obtained from analysis of the Hirshfeld surface (HS) (Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009) and the two-dimensional fingerprint plots (McKinnon et al., 2007). The program CrystalExplorer (Turner et al., 2017) was used to generate Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over dnorm and the electrostatic potential for compounds TBT and DINT. The function dnorm is a ratio enclosing the distances of any surface point to the nearest interior (di) and exterior (de) atom and the van der Waals (vdW) radii of the atoms. The electrostatic potentials were calculated using TONTO (Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009) integrated into CrystalExplorer, using the as the starting geometry. Short contacts and contributions to the Hirshfeld surface for DINT, DCNT (Medjroubi et al., 2017) and TBT are given in Table 2. The Hirshfeld surface (HS) mapped over the electrostatic potential for DINT in the range [−0.071 to +0.041], is shown in Fig. 7a where the red and blue regions represent negative and positive electrostatic potentials respectively. The Hirshfeld surface mapped over dnorm is depicted in Fig. 7b. The HS mapped over shape-index and curvedness are shown in Fig. 7c and 7d, respectively.
|
The crystal environment about a DINT molecule is illustrated in Fig. 8: the interactions are shown on the Hirshfeld surfaces with short contacts indicated in red. The two-dimensional fingerprint plots for all contacts are illustrated in Fig. 9a. The I⋯O/O⋯I interaction ensures the cohesion of the crystal with a contribution of 16% of all the interactions appearing in bright-red spots on the Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over dnorm. The fingerprint consists of two spikes with the ends at de + di ≃ 3.1 Å, Fig. 9c. The fingerprint of the C⋯H/H⋯C interaction consists of two symmetrical peaks with a de + di ≃ 2.8 Å, Fig. 9f and almost equal to the sum of van der Waals radii. It is represented on the HS mapped with the shape-index property in the form of a pale-red spot, Fig. 7c. The I⋯I interaction is less important than O⋯I/I⋯O; however, it does contribute 4.8% to the total interactions, illustrating the equality of the I⋯I distance to the sum of van der Waals radii. The fingerprint is composed of a single peak in the form of a needle with de + di ≃ 3.8 Å, Fig. 9h. The absence of π–π stacking interactions is consistent with the low contributions of C⋯C contacts to the Hirshfeld surface (Table 2). The Hirshfeld surface analysis (Fig. 10b) and electrostatic potential surface (Fig. 10a) show the intermolecular interactions between different units in the crystalline environment of DCNT. The HS mapped over shape-index and curvedness are shown in Fig. 10c and d, respectively. The two-dimensional fingerprint plots for all contacts are illustrated in Fig. 11. The contributions of the major intermolecular contacts in the title compound are Cl⋯H/H⋯Cl (26.8%), O⋯H/H⋯O (26.1%), and H⋯H (10.6%) (Fig. 11a). Other contacts (e.g. C⋯C, H⋯C/C⋯H, Cl⋯Cl, Cl⋯C/C⋯Cl, Cl⋯O/O⋯Cl) make contributions of less than 7.5% to the HS. The graph shown in Fig. 11b represents the one-third of all the intermolecular contacts. All fingerprint points are located at distances with di equal to or greater than van der Waals distances, de + di ≃ 1.27 Å, reflecting a zero tendency to form this intermolecular contact (Cl⋯H). The graph shown in Fig. 11c (O⋯H/H⋯O) shows the contact between the oxygen atoms inside the surface and the hydrogen atoms outside the surface, de + di ≃ 2.35 Å, and has two symmetrical points at the top, bottom left and right. The graph shown in Fig. 11d (H⋯H; 10.6%) shows the two-dimensional fingerprint of the (di, de) points associated with hydrogen atoms, which has two symmetrical wings on the left and right with de + di ≃ 2.3 Å.
The electrostatic potentials were mapped on the Hirshfeld surface using the STO-3G basis/Hartree–Fock level of theory over the range [−0.016, 0.036] for TBT (Fig. 12). Atoms H7A, H7B and H7C of the methyl group and H3, H5 as donors, and the bromine atom acceptors, are also evident in Fig. 12a. The Hirshfeld surface mapped over dnorm is depicted in Fig. 12b. The overall 2D fingerprint plot is presented in Fig. 13a. The halogen–halogen (Br⋯Br) interaction contributes 17.4% to the HS and ensures the cohesion of the crystal and dictates the intermolecular stacking. The short intramolecular H⋯Br/Br⋯H contact between C3—H7B and Br1 (H7B⋯Br1 = 2.6 Å) can be recognized from the two neighbouring blue regions on the surface mapped with electrostatic potential in Fig. 14c,d. The two-dimensional fingerprint plot delineated into Br⋯H/H⋯Br has two peaks pointing to the pairs de + di ≃ 3.0 Å, slightly lower than or equal to the sum of van der Waals radii, Fig. 14b. These correspond to a 42.7% contribution to the Hirshfeld surface, and reflect the presence of intermolecular C7—H7C⋯Br3 interactions. The interatomic H⋯H contacts at distances greater than their van der Waals separation appear as scattered points in the greater part of the fingerprint plot Fig. 14c. The presence of C—H⋯π and H—C⋯π stacking interactions between the TBT rings is also apparent from the appearance of red and blue triangle pairs on the Hirshfeld surface mapped with shape-index property identified with arrows in Fig. 12c. The immediate environment about each molecule highlighting close contacts to the Hirshfeld surface by neighboring molecules is shown in Fig. 13. The relative contributions to the overall surface are given in Table 2.
5. Database survey
A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.40, last update May 2019; Groom et al., 2016) for 2,6-diiodo-4-nitrotoluene (DINT) and 2,4,6-tribromotoluene (TBT) gave five hits: 2,6-dichloro-4-nitrotoluene (DCNT; Medjroubi et al., 2017), dibromonitrotoluene (DBNT; Medjroubi et al., 2016), triiodomesitylene (TIM) (Boudjada et al., 2001), tribromomesitylene (TBM; Boudjada et al., 1999) and dibromomesitylene (DBM; Hernandez et al., 2003). In DBNT (Medjroubi et al., 2016), there are two independent molecules per and the methyl group H atoms are positionally disordered, as found for DBM (Hernandez et al., 2003). While in the compounds DINT and DCNT (Medjroubi et al., 2017), there is only one molecule in the and no disorder is observed for the methyl group H atoms. In the molecule of DINT, a Cm—H (m = methyl) bond is perpendicular to the mean plane of the molecule, as found for triiodomesitylene (TIM; Boudjada et al., 2001). The nitro group is inclined to the benzene ring by 16.72 (1)° in DINT, compared with 9.8 (3)° in DCNT, and 2.5 (5)° and 5.9 (4)° in DBNT. In the molecule of TBT, the CH3 group presents an eclipsed C—H bond with the mean plane of the molecule. This also applies to DCNT (Medjroubi et al., 2017), which does not present any disorder, as was also found in the case of tribromomesitylene TBM (Boudjada et al., 1999). In 2,6-dihalogeno-4-nitrotoluene, as in the title compounds, the cohesion of the crystal is ensured by interactions of the type C—H⋯halogen and C—halogen⋯halogen.
6. Synthesis and crystallization
2,6-Diiodo-4-nitrotoluene (DINT): 4-nitrotoluene (0.68g, 5 mmol) was suspended in 90% (v/v) conc. H2SO4 (10 ml) at 298–303 K. While keeping the same temperature, the iodinating solution containing the I+ intermediate in ca 50% excess was added dropwise under stirring over 45 min. The stirring was continued at 298–303 K for a further 75 min. The final reaction mixture was poured, with stirring, into ice–water (300 g). The crude solid obtained was recrystallized from ethanol (27 ml). On slow evaporation of the solvent, colourless prismatic crystals of DINT were obtained (yield 77%, 1.5 g).
2,4,6-Tribromotoluene (TBT) is commercially available (Sigma–Aldrich). It was recrystallized from ethanol solution, giving large colourless needle-like crystals, many of which were twinned.
7. details
Crystal data, data collection and structure . The H atoms were included in calculated positions and refined as riding: C—H = 0.95–0.98 Å with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(C-methyl) and 1.2Ueq(C) for other H atoms.
details for DINT and TBT are summarized in Table 3Supporting information
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989020010270/dj2011sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, DINT, TBT. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock DINT. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989020010270/dj2011DINTsup2.hkl
Structure factors: contains datablock TBT. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989020010270/dj2011TBTsup3.hkl
For both structures, data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2006); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2006); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2006); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR2004 (Burla et al., 2005). Program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2015) for DINT; SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015) for TBT. For both structures, molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2020); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX publication routines (Farrugia, 2012).C7H5I2NO2 | F(000) = 704 |
Mr = 388.92 | Dx = 2.653 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc | Cell parameters from 3615 reflections |
a = 4.3815 (2) Å | θ = 2.8–27.4° |
b = 15.3348 (6) Å | µ = 6.42 mm−1 |
c = 14.5894 (6) Å | T = 150 K |
β = 96.588 (1)° | Prism, colourless |
V = 973.78 (7) Å3 | 0.29 × 0.13 × 0.06 mm |
Z = 4 |
Bruker APEXII diffractometer | 1850 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
CCD rotation images, thin slices scans | Rint = 0.022 |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2006) | θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.7° |
Tmin = 0.382, Tmax = 0.680 | h = −5→5 |
4104 measured reflections | k = −19→19 |
2244 independent reflections | l = 0→18 |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.024 | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
wR(F2) = 0.046 | H-atom parameters constrained |
S = 0.98 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0064P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
2244 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
110 parameters | Δρmax = 0.65 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Δρmin = −0.55 e Å−3 |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
I2 | 0.49927 (5) | 0.16308 (2) | 0.43507 (2) | 0.02865 (8) | |
I1 | 0.61809 (6) | −0.09049 (2) | 0.11508 (2) | 0.03239 (8) | |
O2 | 1.0610 (7) | 0.31383 (17) | 0.16120 (19) | 0.0439 (7) | |
O1 | 1.2265 (6) | 0.21412 (17) | 0.07502 (18) | 0.0383 (6) | |
N1 | 1.0741 (6) | 0.2380 (2) | 0.1357 (2) | 0.0270 (7) | |
C4 | 0.9021 (7) | 0.1719 (2) | 0.1809 (2) | 0.0213 (7) | |
C5 | 0.7967 (7) | 0.1926 (2) | 0.2637 (2) | 0.0226 (7) | |
C7 | 0.4089 (8) | −0.0220 (2) | 0.3155 (3) | 0.0311 (8) | |
C3 | 0.8521 (7) | 0.0917 (2) | 0.1389 (2) | 0.0248 (8) | |
C6 | 0.6400 (7) | 0.1288 (2) | 0.3069 (2) | 0.0223 (7) | |
C1 | 0.5769 (7) | 0.0462 (2) | 0.2676 (2) | 0.0238 (8) | |
C2 | 0.6870 (7) | 0.0302 (2) | 0.1830 (2) | 0.0243 (8) | |
H5 | 0.830322 | 0.248772 | 0.290300 | 0.027* | |
H3 | 0.927896 | 0.078917 | 0.081954 | 0.030* | |
H7A | 0.556153 | −0.056139 | 0.356537 | 0.047* | |
H7B | 0.298926 | −0.060732 | 0.269445 | 0.047* | |
H7C | 0.261494 | 0.006076 | 0.351681 | 0.047* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
I2 | 0.02982 (13) | 0.03671 (15) | 0.02075 (13) | 0.00201 (11) | 0.00862 (10) | −0.00039 (10) |
I1 | 0.03450 (14) | 0.02883 (14) | 0.03341 (16) | −0.00032 (11) | 0.00206 (11) | −0.00721 (11) |
O2 | 0.0607 (19) | 0.0330 (15) | 0.0414 (18) | −0.0150 (14) | 0.0212 (15) | −0.0067 (13) |
O1 | 0.0426 (16) | 0.0438 (16) | 0.0318 (16) | 0.0010 (13) | 0.0189 (13) | 0.0059 (13) |
N1 | 0.0268 (15) | 0.0334 (17) | 0.0210 (16) | −0.0023 (14) | 0.0039 (13) | 0.0026 (14) |
C4 | 0.0170 (16) | 0.0263 (18) | 0.0206 (18) | 0.0018 (14) | 0.0014 (13) | 0.0045 (14) |
C5 | 0.0216 (17) | 0.0259 (18) | 0.0200 (18) | 0.0007 (14) | 0.0009 (14) | 0.0011 (15) |
C7 | 0.0290 (19) | 0.030 (2) | 0.035 (2) | −0.0010 (17) | 0.0083 (16) | 0.0031 (17) |
C3 | 0.0226 (17) | 0.0310 (19) | 0.0204 (19) | 0.0045 (15) | 0.0010 (14) | −0.0018 (15) |
C6 | 0.0185 (16) | 0.0330 (19) | 0.0148 (18) | 0.0066 (15) | −0.0007 (14) | 0.0009 (15) |
C1 | 0.0200 (16) | 0.0279 (19) | 0.0229 (19) | 0.0055 (15) | −0.0003 (14) | 0.0034 (15) |
C2 | 0.0224 (17) | 0.0233 (18) | 0.026 (2) | 0.0011 (15) | −0.0015 (15) | −0.0029 (15) |
I2—C6 | 2.101 (3) | C7—C1 | 1.497 (5) |
I1—C2 | 2.105 (3) | C7—H7A | 0.9800 |
O2—N1 | 1.224 (4) | C7—H7B | 0.9800 |
O1—N1 | 1.224 (4) | C7—H7C | 0.9800 |
N1—C4 | 1.464 (4) | C3—C2 | 1.389 (5) |
C4—C5 | 1.378 (5) | C3—H3 | 0.9500 |
C4—C3 | 1.381 (5) | C6—C1 | 1.404 (5) |
C5—C6 | 1.388 (5) | C1—C2 | 1.398 (5) |
C5—H5 | 0.9500 | ||
O2—N1—O1 | 123.5 (3) | H7B—C7—H7C | 109.5 |
O2—N1—C4 | 118.4 (3) | C4—C3—C2 | 117.6 (3) |
O1—N1—C4 | 118.0 (3) | C4—C3—H3 | 121.2 |
C5—C4—C3 | 122.8 (3) | C2—C3—H3 | 121.2 |
C5—C4—N1 | 118.5 (3) | C5—C6—C1 | 122.3 (3) |
C3—C4—N1 | 118.7 (3) | C5—C6—I2 | 116.1 (2) |
C4—C5—C6 | 118.0 (3) | C1—C6—I2 | 121.7 (3) |
C4—C5—H5 | 121.0 | C2—C1—C6 | 116.5 (3) |
C6—C5—H5 | 121.0 | C2—C1—C7 | 121.8 (3) |
C1—C7—H7A | 109.5 | C6—C1—C7 | 121.6 (3) |
C1—C7—H7B | 109.5 | C3—C2—C1 | 122.7 (3) |
H7A—C7—H7B | 109.5 | C3—C2—I1 | 115.7 (3) |
C1—C7—H7C | 109.5 | C1—C2—I1 | 121.6 (3) |
H7A—C7—H7C | 109.5 | ||
O2—N1—C4—C5 | −15.8 (4) | C5—C6—C1—C2 | 1.5 (5) |
O1—N1—C4—C5 | 163.4 (3) | I2—C6—C1—C2 | −178.8 (2) |
O2—N1—C4—C3 | 164.2 (3) | C5—C6—C1—C7 | 179.7 (3) |
O1—N1—C4—C3 | −16.7 (4) | I2—C6—C1—C7 | −0.6 (4) |
C3—C4—C5—C6 | 1.5 (5) | C4—C3—C2—C1 | −1.2 (5) |
N1—C4—C5—C6 | −178.6 (3) | C4—C3—C2—I1 | 179.8 (2) |
C5—C4—C3—C2 | 0.3 (5) | C6—C1—C2—C3 | 0.3 (5) |
N1—C4—C3—C2 | −179.7 (3) | C7—C1—C2—C3 | −177.8 (3) |
C4—C5—C6—C1 | −2.4 (5) | C6—C1—C2—I1 | 179.2 (2) |
C4—C5—C6—I2 | 177.9 (2) | C7—C1—C2—I1 | 1.1 (4) |
C7H5Br3 | F(000) = 608 |
Mr = 328.84 | Dx = 2.592 Mg m−3 |
Monoclinic, P21/n | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
a = 14.3484 (11) Å | Cell parameters from 2989 reflections |
b = 3.9955 (3) Å | θ = 2.4–27.5° |
c = 15.6975 (12) Å | µ = 14.28 mm−1 |
β = 110.519 (2)° | T = 150 K |
V = 842.83 (11) Å3 | Prism, colourless |
Z = 4 | 0.34 × 0.21 × 0.12 mm |
Bruker APEXII diffractometer | 1657 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
CCD rotation images, thin slices scans | Rint = 0.027 |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2006) | θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.4° |
Tmin = 0.496, Tmax = 0.746 | h = −18→18 |
6197 measured reflections | k = −4→5 |
1928 independent reflections | l = −18→20 |
Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.025 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.049 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0154P)2 + 1.1776P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 1.08 | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
1928 reflections | Δρmax = 0.70 e Å−3 |
93 parameters | Δρmin = −0.68 e Å−3 |
0 restraints | Extinction correction: SHELXL-2018/3 (Sheldrick 2015), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4 |
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Extinction coefficient: 0.00060 (17) |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
Br1 | 0.68701 (2) | 1.18762 (9) | 0.84471 (2) | 0.02351 (10) | |
Br2 | 0.36077 (2) | 0.60522 (9) | 0.90955 (2) | 0.02044 (10) | |
Br3 | 0.35213 (2) | 0.68698 (9) | 0.55023 (2) | 0.02088 (10) | |
C1 | 0.5156 (2) | 0.9306 (8) | 0.7029 (2) | 0.0151 (7) | |
C2 | 0.5592 (2) | 0.9823 (8) | 0.7965 (2) | 0.0165 (7) | |
C3 | 0.5158 (2) | 0.8920 (8) | 0.8588 (2) | 0.0167 (7) | |
H3 | 0.548214 | 0.934507 | 0.921902 | 0.020* | |
C4 | 0.4234 (2) | 0.7369 (8) | 0.8266 (2) | 0.0154 (7) | |
C5 | 0.3755 (2) | 0.6790 (8) | 0.7351 (2) | 0.0148 (7) | |
H5 | 0.312062 | 0.574516 | 0.713540 | 0.018* | |
C6 | 0.4217 (2) | 0.7759 (8) | 0.6756 (2) | 0.0156 (7) | |
C7 | 0.5638 (2) | 1.0280 (9) | 0.6357 (2) | 0.0219 (8) | |
H7A | 0.576650 | 0.826805 | 0.605878 | 0.033* | |
H7B | 0.626764 | 1.142988 | 0.667500 | 0.033* | |
H7C | 0.519404 | 1.177907 | 0.589887 | 0.033* |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
Br1 | 0.01425 (15) | 0.0243 (2) | 0.02664 (18) | −0.00447 (13) | 0.00050 (13) | 0.00205 (15) |
Br2 | 0.02155 (16) | 0.0246 (2) | 0.01674 (16) | −0.00194 (14) | 0.00871 (12) | 0.00230 (14) |
Br3 | 0.02070 (16) | 0.0273 (2) | 0.01272 (15) | −0.00059 (14) | 0.00346 (12) | −0.00326 (14) |
C1 | 0.0149 (14) | 0.0130 (17) | 0.0176 (15) | 0.0034 (13) | 0.0058 (12) | 0.0028 (13) |
C2 | 0.0139 (14) | 0.0131 (17) | 0.0191 (15) | −0.0009 (12) | 0.0016 (12) | 0.0024 (13) |
C3 | 0.0176 (15) | 0.0133 (17) | 0.0146 (15) | 0.0003 (13) | −0.0002 (12) | −0.0026 (13) |
C4 | 0.0166 (14) | 0.0153 (18) | 0.0161 (15) | 0.0033 (13) | 0.0081 (12) | 0.0007 (13) |
C5 | 0.0123 (14) | 0.0148 (17) | 0.0163 (15) | −0.0015 (12) | 0.0039 (12) | −0.0013 (13) |
C6 | 0.0173 (14) | 0.0134 (17) | 0.0133 (14) | 0.0030 (13) | 0.0017 (12) | −0.0041 (13) |
C7 | 0.0162 (15) | 0.029 (2) | 0.0213 (17) | 0.0023 (14) | 0.0074 (13) | 0.0042 (15) |
Br1—C2 | 1.907 (3) | C3—H3 | 0.9500 |
Br2—C4 | 1.898 (3) | C4—C5 | 1.377 (4) |
Br3—C6 | 1.903 (3) | C5—C6 | 1.376 (5) |
C1—C2 | 1.396 (4) | C5—H5 | 0.9500 |
C1—C6 | 1.405 (4) | C7—H7A | 0.9800 |
C1—C7 | 1.502 (4) | C7—H7B | 0.9800 |
C2—C3 | 1.379 (5) | C7—H7C | 0.9800 |
C3—C4 | 1.389 (4) | ||
C2—C1—C6 | 114.5 (3) | C6—C5—C4 | 118.5 (3) |
C2—C1—C7 | 123.6 (3) | C6—C5—H5 | 120.8 |
C6—C1—C7 | 121.9 (3) | C4—C5—H5 | 120.7 |
C3—C2—C1 | 124.1 (3) | C5—C6—C1 | 123.7 (3) |
C3—C2—Br1 | 116.2 (2) | C5—C6—Br3 | 116.5 (2) |
C1—C2—Br1 | 119.7 (2) | C1—C6—Br3 | 119.8 (2) |
C2—C3—C4 | 118.0 (3) | C1—C7—H7A | 109.5 |
C2—C3—H3 | 121.0 | C1—C7—H7B | 109.5 |
C4—C3—H3 | 121.0 | H7A—C7—H7B | 109.5 |
C5—C4—C3 | 121.2 (3) | C1—C7—H7C | 109.5 |
C5—C4—Br2 | 119.1 (2) | H7A—C7—H7C | 109.5 |
C3—C4—Br2 | 119.7 (2) | H7B—C7—H7C | 109.5 |
C6—C1—C2—C3 | 0.0 (5) | C3—C4—C5—C6 | 0.5 (5) |
C7—C1—C2—C3 | −179.6 (3) | Br2—C4—C5—C6 | 179.9 (2) |
C6—C1—C2—Br1 | 179.7 (2) | C4—C5—C6—C1 | 0.2 (5) |
C7—C1—C2—Br1 | 0.1 (5) | C4—C5—C6—Br3 | 179.7 (2) |
C1—C2—C3—C4 | 0.7 (5) | C2—C1—C6—C5 | −0.5 (5) |
Br1—C2—C3—C4 | −179.0 (2) | C7—C1—C6—C5 | 179.2 (3) |
C2—C3—C4—C5 | −0.9 (5) | C2—C1—C6—Br3 | −179.9 (2) |
C2—C3—C4—Br2 | 179.7 (2) | C7—C1—C6—Br3 | −0.3 (4) |
Compound | D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
(I) | C7—H7B···I1 | 0.98 | 2.82 | 3.333 (4) | 113 |
C7—H7C···I2 | 0.98 | 2.84 | 3.331 (4) | 112 | |
(II) | C7—H7B···Br1 | 0.98 | 2.61 | 3.199 (3) | 118 |
DINT | DCNT | TBT | |||
Contact | % | Contact | % | Contact | % |
I···H/H···I | 25.7 | Cl···H/H···Cl | 26.8 | Br···H/H···Br | 42.7 |
I···O/O···I | 16.0 | ||||
O···H/H···O | 15.6 | O···H/H···O | 26.1 | ||
H···H | 12.7 | H···H | 9.1 | H···H | 18.2 |
C···H/H···C | 11.1 | C···H/H···C | 6.9 | C···H/H···C | 8.0 |
O···C/C···O | 5.3 | ||||
I···I | 4.8 | Cl···Cl | 5.9 | Br···Br | 17.4 |
C···C | 3.4 | C···C | 7.4 | C···C | 7.3 |
Cl···O/O···Cl | 5.0 | ||||
Cl···C/C···Cl | 5.1 | Br···C/C···Br | 6.4 |
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Centre de Diffractométrie de l'Université de Rennes 1 for the data collection.
References
Boudjada, A., Hernandez, O., Meinnel, J., Mani, M. & Paulus, W. (2001). Acta Cryst. C57, 1106–1108. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Boudjada, F., Meinnel, J., Cousson, A., Paulus, W., Mani, M. & Sanquer, M. (1999). AIP Conf. Proc. pp. 217–222. CrossRef Google Scholar
Bruker (2006). APEX2, SAINT and SADABS. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Burla, M. C., Caliandro, R., Camalli, M., Carrozzini, B., Cascarano, G. L., De Caro, L., Giacovazzo, C., Polidori, G. & Spagna, R. (2005). J. Appl. Cryst. 38, 381–388. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hernandez, O., Cousson, A., Plazanet, M., Nierlich, M. & Meinnel, J. (2003). Acta Cryst. C59, o445–o450. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Macrae, C. F., Sovago, I., Cottrell, S. J., Galek, P. T. A., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Platings, M., Shields, G. P., Stevens, J. S., Towler, M. & Wood, P. A. (2020). J. Appl. Cryst. 53, 226–235. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
McKinnon, J. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2007). Chem. Commun. pp. 3814. Google Scholar
Medjroubi, M. L., Boudjada, A., Hamdouni, N., Jeannin, O. & Meinnel, J. (2017). IUCrData, 2, x170672. Google Scholar
Medjroubi, M. L., Jeannin, O., Fourmigué, M., Boudjada, A. & Meinnel, J. (2016). IUCrData, 1, x160621. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spackman, M. A. & Jayatilaka, D. (2009). CrystEngComm, 11, 19–32. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Tazi, M., Meinnel, J., Sanquer, M., Nusimovici, M., Tonnard, F. & Carrie, R. (1995). Acta Cryst. B51, 838–847. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Spackman, P. R., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2017). CrystalExplorer17. University of Western Australia. https://hirshfeldsurface.net. Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.