research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 76| Part 9| September 2020| Pages 1421-1426
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989020010841

Crystal structures of tolfenamic acid polymorphic forms I and II with precise hydrogen-atom positions for nuclear magnetic resonance studies

CROSSMARK_Color_square_no_text.svg
Helen Blade,a Charles D. Blundellb* and Iñigo J. Vitorica-Yrezabalc

aOral Product Development, Pharmaceutical Technology & Development, Operations, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, SK10 2NA, United Kingdom, bC4X Discovery, 53 Portland Street, Manchester, M1 3LD, United Kingdom, and cSchool of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom
*Correspondence e-mail: charles.blundell@c4xdiscovery.com

Edited by W. T. A. Harrison, University of Aberdeen, Scotland (Received 22 July 2020; accepted 6 August 2020; online 11 August 2020)

The structures of tolfenamic acid [TFA; 2-(3-chloro-2-methyl­anilino)benzoic acid, C14H12ClNO2] polymorph forms I and II have been redetermined [compare Andersen et al. (1989[Andersen, K. V., Larsen, S., Alhede, B., Gelting, N. & Buchardt, O. (1989). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 1443-1447.]). J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 1443–1447] with improved precision using high-resolution X-ray diffraction data and Hirshfield atom refinement in order to better define both hydrogen-atom locations and their associated bond lengths. Covalent bond lengths to hydrogen were found to be significantly longer throughout both structures, especially for the anilino H atom, which is involved in an important intra­molecular N—H⋯O hydrogen bond to the carb­oxy­lic acid group. This hydrogen bond is shown to clearly perturb the electron density around both oxygen atoms in the latter group. The extended structures of both polymorphs feature carb­oxy­lic acid inversion dimers. These structures provide an improved foundation for nuclear magnetic resonance studies in both solution and the solid state.

CCDC references: 1960855; 1960856

Similar articles

1. Chemical context

Tolfenamic acid (TFA; 2-[(3-chloro-2-methyl­phen­yl)amino]­benzoic acid; C14H12ClNO2) is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). It is frequently used as a model for crystallography studies because it displays inter­esting polymorphism, with eight forms identified to date (Andersen et al., 1989[Andersen, K. V., Larsen, S., Alhede, B., Gelting, N. & Buchardt, O. (1989). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 1443-1447.]; López-Mejías et al., 2009[López-Mejías, V., Kampf, J. W. & Matzger, A. J. (2009). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 4554-4555.]; Case et al., 2018[Case, D. H., Srirambhatla, V. K., Guo, R., Watson, R. E., Price, L. S., Polyzois, H., Cockcroft, J. K., Florence, A. J., Tocher, D. A. & Price, S. L. (2018). Cryst. Growth Des. 18, 5322-5331.]). Moreover, its small size and simple crystal structures permit timely computational calculations, which is advantageous for studies investigating its behaviour by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR).

[Scheme 1]

The two most common polymorphs of TFA (forms I and II) differ principally in the dihedral angles between the phenyl rings, giving different overall conformations and attendant packing arrangements (Andersen et al., 1989[Andersen, K. V., Larsen, S., Alhede, B., Gelting, N. & Buchardt, O. (1989). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 1443-1447.]). A number of experimental and theoretical studies have been performed on TFA to explore the origin of this (see e.g. Ang et al., 2016[Ang, L. S., Mohamed-Ibrahim, M. I. & Sulaiman, S. (2016). Phys. Res. Int., article ID 3537842.]; Du et al., 2015[Du, W., Cruz-Cabeza, A. J., Woutersen, S., Davey, R. J. & Yin, Q. (2015). Chem. Sci. 6, 3515-3524.]; Mattei & Li, 2012[Mattei, A. & Li, T. (2012). Pharm. Res. 29, 460-470.], 2014[Mattei, A. & Li, T. (2014). Cryst. Growth Des. 14, 2709-2713.]; Mattei et al., 2013[Mattei, A., Mei, X., Miller, A. F. & Li, T. (2013). Cryst. Growth Des. 13, 3303-3307.]). Both form I and form II are easily prepared in sufficient amounts and purity under standard laboratory conditions to permit solid-state NMR studies and they are readily distinguishable by their colour (form I, white; form II, yellow) (Andersen et al., 1989[Andersen, K. V., Larsen, S., Alhede, B., Gelting, N. & Buchardt, O. (1989). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 1443-1447.]). TFA is soluble in a variety of crystallization solvents and is suitable for having its conformational behaviour precisely characterized by solution-state NMR methods (Blundell et al., 2013[Blundell, C. D., Packer, M. J. & Almond, A. (2013). Bioorg. Med. Chem. 21, 4976-4987.]).

Our motivation for the present study was the desire to generate high resolution structures of both forms I and II in which the locations of the hydrogen atoms and their attendant bond lengths were precisely resolved. Accurate hydrogen positions are important for both solid- and solution-state NMR studies because 1H is a chief nucleus for acquiring experimental data through and a variety of experimental observables depend sensitively on bond lengths to hydrogen (e.g. chemical shifts of hydrogen atoms involved in hydrogen bonding, see Siskos et al., 2017[Siskos, M. G., Choudhary, M. I. & Gerothanassis, I. P. (2017). Molecules, 22, 415-446.]; residual dipolar couplings, see Lipsitz & Tjandra, 2004[Lipsitz, R. S. & Tjandra, N. (2004). Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 33, 387-413.]). Structures with precise hydrogen positions therefore provide more robust starting points for density functional theory (DFT) calculations of NMR observables in the solid-state and, in the solution state, a better mean-average geometry to found conformational analysis upon.

Accordingly, large single crystals (needles 0.5–1 mm in length) of forms I and II were grown that diffracted to d ≃ 0.48 Å (2θmax = 95.5°, T = 100 K) and 0.53 Å (83.6°, 150 K), respectively with Mo Kα radiation. The structures of each form were solved and refined using Hirshfeld atom refinement, which determines the structural parameters from single crystal X-ray diffraction data by using an aspherical atom partitioning of ab initio quantum mechanical mol­ecular electron densities (Capelli et al., 2014[Capelli, S. C., Bürgi, H.-B., Dittrich, B., Grabowsky, S. & Jayatilaka, D. (2014). IUCrJ, 1, 361-379.]). Significantly for our purpose, the precision of the determined bond lengths and anisotropic displacement parameters for the hydrogen atoms calculated with Hirshfeld atom refinement with data of this resolution is comparable to that from neutron diffraction measurements (Fugel et al., 2018[Fugel, M., Jayatilaka, D., Hupf, E., Overgaard, J., Hathwar, V. R., Macchi, P., Turner, M. J., Howard, J. A. K., Dolomanov, O. V., Puschmann, H., Iversen, B. B., Bürgi, H.-B. & Grabowsky, S. (2018). IUCrJ, 5, 32-44.]).

2. Structural commentary

The crystal structure determination of forms I and II was achieved (Fig. 1[link]). Both forms are monoclinic, with form I in space group P21/c and form II in P21/n; both structures comprise Z′ = 1 and Z = 4 and form an inter­nal hydrogen bond between N7—H7 and O15 with very similar geometry (Tables 1[link] and 2[link]); this inter­nal hydrogen bond makes the amino­benzoic acid group adopt an essentially planar conformation. The chief difference between the two forms is the dihedral angle between the C1–C6 and C8–C13 phenyl rings, being 72.82 (4)° for form I and 44.34 (3)° for form II. This is also seen in the torsion angle C8—N7—C1—C6, with values of 74.34 (12) and −143.00 (6)° for forms I and II, respectively (in the crystal an equal number of mol­ecules have the opposite sign for these torsion angles). Additionally, the C8—N7—C1 angle also differs somewhat [form I 123.97 (7); form II 129.34 (5)°]. The methyl group torsion angle differs between the two structures, with form I having one hydrogen atom almost coplanar with the 3-chloro-2-methyl­phenyl ring and form II having one hydrogen atom orthogonal to it. The displacement parameters of the ellipsoids show that the methyl groups in both structures display greater motion relative to the rest of their structures.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for form I[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
N7—H7⋯O15 1.02 (2) 1.85 (2) 2.6650 (10) 134.0 (19)
O16—H16⋯O15i 1.02 (2) 1.63 (2) 2.6448 (10) 175 (2)
C18—H18A⋯Cl17ii 1.09 (3) 2.81 (3) 3.8674 (11) 163 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) -x, -y+1, -z+1; (ii) [x, -y+{\script{3\over 2}}, z-{\script{1\over 2}}].

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for form II[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
N7—H7⋯O15 1.019 (11) 1.800 (10) 2.6469 (7) 138.0 (8)
O16—H16⋯O15i 0.998 (14) 1.640 (14) 2.6381 (8) 179.0 (12)
Symmetry code: (i) -x+2, -y+1, -z+1.
[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The mol­ecular structures of TFA in form I and form II, with atom labelling. The inter­nal N7—H7⋯O15 hydrogen bond is indicated with a dotted line. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

3. Supra­molecular features

The packing arrangement for both forms are shown in Fig. 2[link]. In both structures, O—H⋯O hydrogen-bonding inter­actions between the carb­oxy­lic acid groups on pairs of TFA mol­ecules result in the formation of symmetrical hydrogen-bonded dimers that are related by an inversion centre (Tables 1[link] and 2[link]; Figs. 3[link] and 4[link]).

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Crystal structures of TFA form I and form II showing their inversion-dimer pairs and differing packing arrangements (both viewed along the a axis). Hydrogen bonds are indicated with dotted lines. For clarity, only polar hydrogen atoms have been included.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Crystal structure of TFA form II, showing the hydrogen-bond network (red dotted lines) and the deformation of the electron density calculated by TONTO (Capelli et al., 2014[Capelli, S. C., Bürgi, H.-B., Dittrich, B., Grabowsky, S. & Jayatilaka, D. (2014). IUCrJ, 1, 361-379.]). Negative electron density is shown with green surfaces and positive electron density is shown with red (threshold level −0.25, Res/Å). Ellipsoids of carbon atoms are shown in grey, nitro­gen blue, oxygen red, hydrogen white and chlorine green.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Detail of the hydrogen-bond network of TFA form I in two orientations, showing the hydrogen bonds (red dotted lines) and the deformation of the electron density calculated by TONTO (Capelli et al., 2014[Capelli, S. C., Bürgi, H.-B., Dittrich, B., Grabowsky, S. & Jayatilaka, D. (2014). IUCrJ, 1, 361-379.]). The differing mol­ecular orbitals for O15 and O16 are clearly visible. Negative electron density is shown with green surfaces and positive electron density is shown with red (threshold level −0.25, Res/Å). Ellipsoids of carbon atoms are shown in grey, nitro­gen blue, oxygen red and hydrogen white.

The structure determination has precisely resolved not only hydrogen-atom positions but also the shape and positions of the electron density corresponding to the mol­ecular orbitals throughout the structure (Figs. 3[link] and 4[link]). Very clear differences between the carboxyl­ate oxygen atoms in the dimer hydrogen-bonding motif are now apparent. Bond C14—O15 has more electron density than C14—O16, revealing its greater double-bond character. Oxygen atom O15 accordingly adopts an sp2 geometry, with its two lone-pairs clearly located in the expected co-planar positions (i.e., at ±120° from the C15—O16 bond); one lone pair accepts the intra­molecular hydrogen bond from H7 while the other receives an inter­molecular hydrogen bond from H16. Atom O16 in contrast has a covalent bond to H16, for which electron density is clearly visible. Despite the apparently dominant double-bond character of C14—O15, O16 is inter­estingly not simply forming a purely single bond with C14 and adopting an sp3 hydridization state: the typical positions of the two sp3 mol­ecular orbitals projecting away from and above and below the carboxyl­ate plane have smeared into a single lobe of density with a significant amount of coplanar (i.e., sp2-like) electron density.

In short, the typical equivalence of the O atoms in the carb­oxy­lic acid has been significantly perturbed by the N7—H7⋯O15 intra­molecular hydrogen bond. These electronic perturbations should be remembered when mol­ecules containing carb­oxy­lic acid groups are being designed to inter­act with protein targets via hydrogen bonding.

4. Database survey

A search for crystal structures containing TFA explicitly in its protonated state was performed within the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD version 5.41, update November 2019; Groom et al., 2016[Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171-179.]). There are eight polymorphs of pure TFA (CSD reference codes KAXXAI, KAXXAI01–07, Andersen et al., 1989[Andersen, K. V., Larsen, S., Alhede, B., Gelting, N. & Buchardt, O. (1989). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 1443-1447.]; López-Mejías et al., 2009[López-Mejías, V., Kampf, J. W. & Matzger, A. J. (2009). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 4554-4555.]; Case et al., 2018[Case, D. H., Srirambhatla, V. K., Guo, R., Watson, R. E., Price, L. S., Polyzois, H., Cockcroft, J. K., Florence, A. J., Tocher, D. A. & Price, S. L. (2018). Cryst. Growth Des. 18, 5322-5331.]) and six co-crystal forms (EXAQIE, Fábián et al., 2011[Fábián, L., Hamill, N., Eccles, K. S., Moynihan, H. A., Maguire, A. R., McCausland, L. & Lawrence, S. E. (2011). Cryst. Growth Des. 11, 3522-3528.]; SIMDOK/01 & SIMFUS/SIMGAZ/SIMGED, Case et al., 2018[Case, D. H., Srirambhatla, V. K., Guo, R., Watson, R. E., Price, L. S., Polyzois, H., Cockcroft, J. K., Florence, A. J., Tocher, D. A. & Price, S. L. (2018). Cryst. Growth Des. 18, 5322-5331.]; UZUZIA & UZUZOG, Bouanga Boudiombo & Jacobs, 2016[Bouanga Boudiombo, J. S. & Jacobs, A. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 836-845.]; XOWKAX/01, Surov et al., 2015[Surov, A. O., Simagina, A. A., Manin, N. G., Kuzmina, L. G., Churakov, A. V. & Perlovich, G. L. (2015). Cryst. Growth Des. 15, 228-238.], Wittering et al., 2015[Wittering, K. E., Agnew, L. R., Klapwijk, A. R., Robertson, K., Cousen, A. J. P., Cruickshank, D. L. & Wilson, C. C. (2015). CrystEngComm, 17, 3610-3618.]). In all cases, the inter­nal hydrogen-bond equvialent to N7—H7⋯O15 in the present structures is present and the hydroxyl hydrogen atom is attached to the corresponding O16 equivalent. The C8—N7—C1—C6 torsion angle ranges from 75.0 to 138.4° in the pure forms and from 76.1 to 156.9° in the co-crystals.

The database structures with refcodes KAXXAI01 and KAXXAI correspond to the crystal structures of form I and form II redetermined here at higher resolution. The locations of the heavy atoms in these new structures do not differ significantly from those reported previously even though, as expected, some hydrogen-atom locations differ substanti­ally (Fig. 5[link]). H7 is in a significantly different position in both structures, materially affecting both its associated hydrogen-bond geometries (compare Tables 1[link] and 2[link] with Table 3[link]) and covalent bond lengths. The N—H bond length is some 23% longer for form I and 17% for form II, which would correspond to a considerable calculated difference in residual dipolar couplings by factors of 1.9 and 1.6 times smaller, respectively. The O—H bond length is slightly longer by 5% for form I and 6% for form II. Carbon–hydrogen bond lengths are also notably longer at 13 ± 3% (min. 6%, max. 17%) for form I and 10 ± 3% (min. 5%, max. 14%) for form II; C—C—H bond angles differ absolutely by 2.6 ± 1.8% (min. 0.0, max 5.7°) for form I and 1.6 ± 1.3° (min. 0.2, max 5.2°) for form II. This improved precision in hydrogen-atom placement provides a significant structural enhancement for subsequent solid- and solution-state NMR studies.

Table 3
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for structures of forms I and II determined by Andersen et al. (1989[Andersen, K. V., Larsen, S., Alhede, B., Gelting, N. & Buchardt, O. (1989). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 1443-1447.])

Form D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
I (KAXXAI01) N7—H7⋯O15 0.79 2.02 2.676 141
  O16—H16⋯O15i 0.97 1.69 2.648 170
           
II (KAXXAI) N7—H7⋯O15 0.84 1.96 2.653 139
  O16—H16⋯O15ii 0.93 1.72 2.648 176
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, 1 − y, 1 − z; (ii) 2 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z.
[Figure 5]
Figure 5
Overlay of asymmetric units of form I and form II, comparing the positions of hydrogen atoms in this work (orange) to previous work (blue; CSD refcodes form I: KAXXAI01, form II: KAXXAI; Andersen et al., 1989[Andersen, K. V., Larsen, S., Alhede, B., Gelting, N. & Buchardt, O. (1989). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 1443-1447.]). Figure produced using 4Sight (C4X Discovery, UK).

5. Synthesis and crystallization

Tolfenamic acid was used as received from Sigma–Aldrich (Gillingham, UK).

Large single crystals of form I (needles 0.5–3 mm in length) were grown by slow evaporation at room temperature: 3 mg of compound was dissolved in an initial volume of 200 µl of ethyl acetate and the mixture was allowed to evaporate to dryness over 24–36 h.

Large single crystals of form II (needles 0.3–1 mm in length) were obtained serendipitously from an attempted salt crystallization experiment, during which form II crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction were isolated. A 1:1 molar ratio of TFA (20 mg of compound) and N-(2-hy­droxy­eth­yl)pyrrolidine were dissolved into approximately 5 ml ethyl acetate. The mixture was then left to slowly evaporate, during which large yellow needles formed. Single-crystal diffraction performed on multiple crystals indicated that these were pure form II. There was no evidence of form I within the product, nor of any inclusion of N-(2-hy­droxy­eth­yl)-pyrrolidine within the form II crystals. Clearly the presence of N-(2-hy­droxy­eth­yl)-pyrrolidine either inhibited the growth of form I crystals and/or promoted the growth of form II crystals; the mechanism for this has not been investigated.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 4[link].

Table 4
Experimental details

  form I form II
Crystal data
Chemical formula C14H12ClNO2 C14H12ClNO2
Mr 261.71 261.71
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/c Monoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K) 100 150
a, b, c (Å) 4.8283 (2), 32.0832 (10), 8.0221 (3) 3.84618 (14), 21.9502 (7), 14.1764 (5)
β (°) 104.936 (4) 94.235 (4)
V (Å3) 1200.70 (8) 1193.57 (7)
Z 4 4
Radiation type Mo Kα Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.31 0.31
Crystal size (mm) 1.0 × 0.4 × 0.2 0.55 × 0.05 × 0.05
 
Data collection
Diffractometer XtaLAB AFC11 (RINC): Kappa single XtaLAB AFC11 (RINC): Kappa single
Absorption correction Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku, 2017[Rigaku OD (2017). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England.]) Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku, 2017[Rigaku OD (2017). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England.])
Tmin, Tmax 0.457, 1.000 0.154, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I ≥ 2σ(I)] reflections 39154, 11328, 8616 22189, 7967, 5973
Rint 0.039 0.032
(sin θ/λ)max (Å−1) 1.042 0.938
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.064, 0.127, 1.04 0.046, 0.077, 1.10
No. of reflections 11328 7967
No. of parameters 271 271
H-atom treatment All H-atom parameters refined All H-atom parameters refined
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.82, −0.69 0.81, −0.54
Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2017[Rigaku OD (2017). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England.]), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3-8.]), olex2.refine (Bourhis et al., 2015[Bourhis, L. J., Dolomanov, O. V., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2015). Acta Cryst. A71, 59-75.]) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009[Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339-341.]).

Intensity data for form I and form II were collected using Mo Kα radiation at 100 and 150 K respectively using a Rigaku FR-X rotating anode diffractometer, equipped with an HyPix-6000HE detector and an Oxford Cryosystems nitro­gen flow gas system. Data were measured and reduced using the CrysAlis PRO suite of programs. Absorption correction was performed using empirical methods implemented in the SCALE3 ABSPACK scaling algorithm (Blessing, 1995[Blessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33-38.]; Sheldrick, 1996[Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.]). The crystal structures were solved and refined against all F2 values using the SHELXL and OLEX2 suite of programs (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.], 2015b[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3-8.]; Dolomanov et al., 2009[Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339-341.]). All atoms (including H atoms) were refined anisotropically.

Hirshfeld atom refinement was achieved using the recently implemented HARt option in OLEX2 (Fugel et al., 2018[Fugel, M., Jayatilaka, D., Hupf, E., Overgaard, J., Hathwar, V. R., Macchi, P., Turner, M. J., Howard, J. A. K., Dolomanov, O. V., Puschmann, H., Iversen, B. B., Bürgi, H.-B. & Grabowsky, S. (2018). IUCrJ, 5, 32-44.]). It precisely estimates the atomic positions and deformation electron densities in crystal structures by deconvolution of accurate static electron density calculated by TONTO from the thermally smeared electron density calculated from an independent atomic model (IAM) obtained from the X-ray diffraction data (Capelli et al., 2014[Capelli, S. C., Bürgi, H.-B., Dittrich, B., Grabowsky, S. & Jayatilaka, D. (2014). IUCrJ, 1, 361-379.]).

The wavefunctions of crystal structures of form I and form II were calculated using TONTO (Capelli et al., 2014[Capelli, S. C., Bürgi, H.-B., Dittrich, B., Grabowsky, S. & Jayatilaka, D. (2014). IUCrJ, 1, 361-379.]), with the cc-pVTZ basis set (Dunning, 1989[Dunning, T. H. (1989). J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1007-1023.]) and the Hartree–Fock method. Wavefunctions for each crystal structure were calculated with the crystal structure grown in order to account for the hydrogen bond formed between the carboxyl­ate groups. Each model obtained was then refined against the single crystal X-ray diffraction data collected, using OLEX2 and the L-M method (Fugel et al., 2018[Fugel, M., Jayatilaka, D., Hupf, E., Overgaard, J., Hathwar, V. R., Macchi, P., Turner, M. J., Howard, J. A. K., Dolomanov, O. V., Puschmann, H., Iversen, B. B., Bürgi, H.-B. & Grabowsky, S. (2018). IUCrJ, 5, 32-44.]).

Supporting information

CCDC references: 1960855; 1960856

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I, II. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989020010841/hb7936sup1.cif

Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989020010841/hb7936Isup2.cml

checkCIF report


Computing details top

For both structures, data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2017); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2017); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2017); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: olex2.refine (Bourhis et al., 2015); molecular graphics: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009); software used to prepare material for publication: OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009).

2-(3-Chloro-2-methylanilino)benzoic acid (I) top
Crystal data top
C14H12ClNO2F(000) = 544.838
Mr = 261.71Dx = 1.448 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 4.8283 (2) ÅCell parameters from 9015 reflections
b = 32.0832 (10) Åθ = 3.8–52.9°
c = 8.0221 (3) ŵ = 0.31 mm−1
β = 104.936 (4)°T = 100 K
V = 1200.70 (8) Å3Plank, clear light colourless
Z = 41.0 × 0.4 × 0.2 mm
Data collection top
XtaLAB AFC11 (RINC): Kappa single
diffractometer		11328 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed X-ray tube, Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source8616 reflections with I ≥ 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.039
ω scansθmax = 47.8°, θmin = 3.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlisPro; Rigaku, 2017)		h = −10→6
Tmin = 0.457, Tmax = 1.000k = −62→72
39154 measured reflectionsl = −18→18
Refinement top
Refinement on F20 constraints
Least-squares matrix: fullPrimary atom site location: dual
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.064All H-atom parameters refined
wR(F2) = 0.127 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.P)2 + 0.987P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.04(Δ/σ)max = 0.0004
11328 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.82 e Å−3
271 parametersΔρmin = −0.69 e Å−3
0 restraints
Special details top

Refinement. Refinement using NoSpherA2, an implementation of NOn-SPHERical Atom-form-factors in Olex2. Please cite:

F. Kleemiss, H. Puschmann, O. Dolomanov, S.Grabowsky - to be publsihed - 2020 NoSpherA2 makes use of tailor-made aspherical atomic form factors calculated on-the-fly from a Hirshfeld-partitioned electron density (ED) - not from spherical-atom form factors.

The ED is calculated from a gaussian basis set single determinant SCF wavefunction - either Hartree-Fock or B3LYP - for a fragment of the crystal embedded in an electrostatic crystal field. The following options were used: SOFTWARE: Tonto METHOD: rhf BASIS SET: def2-SVP CHARGE: 0 MULTIPLICITY: 1 DATE: 2019-10-18_17-21-04 CLUSTER RADIUS: 0

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl170.75639 (6)0.759893 (7)0.58628 (4)0.02423 (5)
O160.07003 (16)0.49986 (2)0.28719 (9)0.01785 (11)
O150.23425 (15)0.53749 (2)0.52534 (9)0.01694 (11)
N70.58438 (18)0.60116 (2)0.51594 (10)0.01698 (12)
C90.39509 (16)0.55388 (2)0.27629 (10)0.01206 (10)
C80.56974 (17)0.58797 (2)0.35212 (10)0.01279 (11)
C100.38168 (19)0.54232 (3)0.10596 (11)0.01506 (12)
C60.66873 (18)0.67645 (3)0.54885 (11)0.01456 (12)
C50.84386 (19)0.70814 (3)0.63887 (12)0.01590 (13)
C140.22811 (17)0.53019 (2)0.37277 (11)0.01293 (11)
C130.73019 (19)0.60848 (3)0.25247 (12)0.01624 (13)
C110.5414 (2)0.56279 (3)0.01027 (12)0.01743 (14)
C10.75379 (18)0.63527 (3)0.59655 (11)0.01417 (11)
C21.0000 (2)0.62691 (3)0.72745 (12)0.01740 (13)
C31.1660 (2)0.65937 (3)0.81486 (13)0.02070 (16)
C41.0886 (2)0.70036 (3)0.77028 (13)0.01962 (15)
C120.7174 (2)0.59587 (3)0.08645 (12)0.01759 (14)
C180.4031 (2)0.68604 (3)0.41021 (15)0.02055 (16)
H100.245 (4)0.5165 (5)0.050 (2)0.032 (4)
H120.851 (4)0.6117 (6)0.015 (3)0.039 (5)
H21.055 (4)0.5947 (6)0.760 (3)0.035 (5)
H41.216 (4)0.7266 (6)0.835 (3)0.040 (5)
H31.356 (4)0.6530 (7)0.919 (3)0.048 (6)
H130.868 (4)0.6342 (6)0.312 (2)0.039 (5)
H110.535 (4)0.5528 (6)−0.120 (2)0.040 (5)
H16−0.038 (5)0.4851 (7)0.364 (3)0.028 (6)
H70.484 (5)0.5821 (7)0.584 (3)0.045 (6)
H18a0.455 (5)0.7026 (9)0.303 (3)0.071 (8)
H18b0.291 (5)0.6586 (7)0.363 (4)0.078 (9)
H18c0.264 (5)0.7068 (8)0.451 (3)0.067 (8)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl170.03142 (12)0.01403 (8)0.02626 (12)−0.00050 (8)0.00568 (9)0.00054 (8)
O160.0216 (3)0.0181 (3)0.0145 (2)−0.0072 (2)0.0059 (2)−0.0029 (2)
O150.0214 (3)0.0177 (3)0.0128 (2)−0.0073 (2)0.0065 (2)−0.00110 (19)
N70.0226 (3)0.0172 (3)0.0131 (3)−0.0077 (2)0.0082 (2)−0.0018 (2)
C90.0133 (3)0.0127 (2)0.0106 (2)−0.0002 (2)0.0040 (2)0.0006 (2)
C80.0140 (3)0.0142 (3)0.0115 (3)−0.0020 (2)0.0057 (2)0.0005 (2)
C100.0181 (3)0.0162 (3)0.0116 (3)0.0000 (2)0.0051 (2)−0.0005 (2)
C60.0137 (3)0.0153 (3)0.0150 (3)−0.0024 (2)0.0042 (2)0.0002 (2)
C50.0176 (3)0.0148 (3)0.0157 (3)−0.0022 (2)0.0048 (2)−0.0015 (2)
C140.0144 (3)0.0127 (3)0.0122 (3)−0.0019 (2)0.0043 (2)0.0000 (2)
C130.0180 (3)0.0186 (3)0.0141 (3)−0.0037 (2)0.0079 (2)0.0010 (2)
C110.0226 (4)0.0193 (3)0.0120 (3)0.0012 (3)0.0074 (3)0.0014 (2)
C10.0164 (3)0.0147 (3)0.0123 (3)−0.0032 (2)0.0052 (2)−0.0005 (2)
C20.0203 (3)0.0163 (3)0.0148 (3)0.0002 (3)0.0031 (3)0.0004 (2)
C30.0212 (4)0.0206 (4)0.0171 (3)−0.0003 (3)−0.0009 (3)−0.0018 (3)
C40.0206 (4)0.0184 (3)0.0180 (3)−0.0037 (3)0.0014 (3)−0.0028 (3)
C120.0202 (3)0.0207 (3)0.0145 (3)−0.0007 (3)0.0092 (3)0.0022 (3)
C180.0150 (3)0.0231 (4)0.0221 (4)−0.0005 (3)0.0022 (3)0.0012 (3)
H100.045 (12)0.030 (10)0.020 (10)−0.008 (9)0.006 (9)0.002 (8)
H120.045 (12)0.041 (12)0.040 (13)−0.013 (10)0.025 (11)−0.003 (10)
H20.039 (12)0.032 (11)0.035 (12)−0.002 (9)0.009 (10)0.001 (9)
H40.047 (13)0.039 (12)0.033 (13)−0.009 (10)0.009 (10)0.003 (10)
H30.033 (12)0.071 (16)0.031 (13)0.000 (11)−0.007 (10)0.002 (11)
H130.053 (13)0.043 (12)0.024 (11)−0.015 (10)0.015 (10)0.001 (9)
H110.048 (13)0.042 (12)0.030 (12)−0.006 (10)0.010 (10)−0.010 (10)
H160.029 (13)0.029 (13)0.028 (14)−0.018 (11)0.010 (11)0.001 (11)
H70.059 (17)0.039 (14)0.044 (15)−0.019 (12)0.026 (13)−0.001 (12)
H18a0.043 (15)0.11 (2)0.048 (16)0.000 (15)0.001 (12)0.031 (16)
H18b0.038 (13)0.039 (13)0.12 (2)−0.007 (11)−0.035 (14)0.014 (15)
H18c0.047 (15)0.09 (2)0.061 (18)0.032 (14)0.007 (13)0.006 (15)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cl17—C51.7383 (9)C5—C41.3887 (13)
O16—C141.3154 (10)C13—C121.3780 (13)
O16—H161.02 (2)C13—H131.090 (19)
O15—C141.2389 (11)C11—C121.3979 (14)
N7—C81.3650 (11)C11—H111.087 (19)
N7—C11.4184 (11)C1—C21.3943 (13)
N7—H71.02 (2)C2—C31.3890 (14)
C9—C81.4188 (11)C2—H21.081 (18)
C9—C101.4012 (11)C3—C41.3885 (14)
C9—C141.4659 (11)C3—H31.089 (19)
C8—C131.4110 (11)C4—H41.093 (19)
C10—C111.3858 (12)C12—H121.092 (17)
C10—H101.080 (17)C18—H18a1.09 (2)
C6—C51.3983 (12)C18—H18b1.05 (2)
C6—C11.4072 (12)C18—H18c1.06 (2)
C6—C181.4969 (13)
H16—O16—C14110.3 (12)C12—C11—C10118.69 (8)
C1—N7—C8123.97 (7)H11—C11—C10120.9 (10)
H7—N7—C8114.6 (13)H11—C11—C12120.4 (10)
H7—N7—C1120.9 (13)C6—C1—N7120.45 (8)
C10—C9—C8119.68 (7)C2—C1—N7118.33 (8)
C14—C9—C8121.36 (7)C2—C1—C6121.18 (8)
C14—C9—C10118.95 (7)C3—C2—C1120.34 (9)
C9—C8—N7121.96 (7)H2—C2—C1118.3 (10)
C13—C8—N7120.08 (8)H2—C2—C3121.3 (10)
C13—C8—C9117.96 (7)C4—C3—C2119.87 (9)
C11—C10—C9121.48 (8)H3—C3—C2120.6 (12)
H10—C10—C9118.4 (10)H3—C3—C4119.5 (12)
H10—C10—C11120.2 (10)C3—C4—C5119.05 (9)
C1—C6—C5116.55 (8)H4—C4—C5119.1 (11)
C18—C6—C5121.50 (8)H4—C4—C3121.8 (11)
C18—C6—C1121.95 (8)C11—C12—C13121.07 (8)
C6—C5—Cl17119.50 (7)H12—C12—C13119.0 (10)
C4—C5—Cl17117.51 (7)H12—C12—C11119.9 (10)
C4—C5—C6122.99 (8)H18a—C18—C6111.1 (12)
O15—C14—O16121.23 (7)H18b—C18—C6111.0 (12)
C9—C14—O16115.60 (7)H18b—C18—H18a109 (2)
C9—C14—O15123.17 (7)H18c—C18—C6113.1 (13)
C12—C13—C8121.09 (8)H18c—C18—H18a103 (2)
H13—C13—C8117.8 (10)H18c—C18—H18b109 (2)
H13—C13—C12121.1 (10)
Cl17—C5—C6—C1179.26 (7)N7—C1—C6—C18−1.38 (10)
Cl17—C5—C6—C18−1.32 (9)N7—C1—C2—C3−177.36 (9)
Cl17—C5—C4—C3−179.56 (8)C9—C8—C13—C120.13 (9)
O16—C14—C9—C8178.63 (7)C9—C10—C11—C12−0.45 (10)
O16—C14—C9—C10−1.64 (9)C8—C13—C12—C111.09 (11)
O15—C14—C9—C8−1.98 (10)C10—C11—C12—C13−0.93 (11)
O15—C14—C9—C10177.76 (8)C6—C5—C4—C30.35 (11)
N7—C8—C9—C10178.26 (8)C6—C1—C2—C30.52 (10)
N7—C8—C9—C14−2.01 (10)C5—C4—C3—C20.40 (12)
N7—C8—C13—C12−179.60 (9)C1—C2—C3—C4−0.82 (11)
N7—C1—C6—C5178.03 (8)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N7—H7···O151.02 (2)1.85 (2)2.6650 (10)134.0 (19)
O16—H16···O15i1.02 (2)1.63 (2)2.6448 (10)175 (2)
C18—H18A···Cl17ii1.09 (3)2.81 (3)3.8674 (11)163 (2)
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) x, −y+3/2, z−1/2.
(II) top
Crystal data top
C14H12ClNO2F(000) = 544.838
Mr = 261.71Dx = 1.456 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 3.84618 (14) ÅCell parameters from 6709 reflections
b = 21.9502 (7) Åθ = 2.3–40.6°
c = 14.1764 (5) ŵ = 0.31 mm−1
β = 94.235 (4)°T = 150 K
V = 1193.57 (7) Å3Needle, clear light colourless
Z = 40.55 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm
Data collection top
XtaLAB AFC11 (RINC): Kappa single
diffractometer		7967 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed X-ray tube, Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source5973 reflections with I ≥ 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.032
ω scansθmax = 41.8°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(CrysAlisPro; Rigaku, 2017)		h = −7→7
Tmin = 0.154, Tmax = 1.000k = −33→40
22189 measured reflectionsl = −26→19
Refinement top
Refinement on F20 constraints
Least-squares matrix: fullPrimary atom site location: dual
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046All H-atom parameters refined
wR(F2) = 0.077 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0284P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.10(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
7967 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.81 e Å−3
271 parametersΔρmin = −0.54 e Å−3
0 restraints
Special details top

Refinement. Refinement using NoSpherA2, an implementation of NOn-SPHERical A tom-form-factors in Olex2. Please cite:

F. Kleemiss, H. Puschmann, O. Dolomanov, S.Grabowsky - to be publsihed - 2020 NoSpherA2 makes use of tailor-made aspherical atomic form factors calculated on-the-fly from a Hirshfeld-partitioned electron density (ED) - not from spherical-atom form factors.

The ED is calculated from a gaussian basis set single determinant SCF wavefunction - either Hartree-Fock or B3LYP - for a fragment of the crystal embedded in an electrostatic crystal field. The following options were used: SOFTWARE: Tonto METHOD: rhf BASIS SET: def2-SVP CHARGE: 0 MULTIPLICITY: 1 DATE: 2019-10-22_21-03-05 CLUSTER RADIUS: 0

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cl170.16061 (4)0.163247 (7)0.476783 (12)0.02253 (4)
C50.30783 (14)0.20431 (2)0.38283 (4)0.01663 (10)
C60.34927 (14)0.26716 (2)0.39149 (4)0.01586 (10)
C80.48962 (13)0.40676 (2)0.26010 (4)0.01554 (10)
C20.55157 (16)0.26655 (3)0.23271 (5)0.01887 (11)
C10.47434 (14)0.29837 (2)0.31392 (4)0.01676 (10)
C40.37873 (15)0.17219 (3)0.30233 (5)0.01955 (11)
C90.60895 (14)0.46663 (2)0.28302 (4)0.01549 (10)
O160.89072 (14)0.53791 (2)0.38625 (4)0.02738 (11)
C110.39417 (16)0.50278 (3)0.12791 (5)0.02097 (12)
N70.54116 (16)0.36075 (2)0.32481 (4)0.02311 (11)
C130.31026 (14)0.39744 (2)0.17112 (4)0.01695 (10)
O150.81422 (14)0.44483 (2)0.44188 (4)0.02923 (12)
C100.56103 (15)0.51329 (2)0.21575 (5)0.01865 (11)
C30.50114 (16)0.20406 (3)0.22700 (5)0.02053 (11)
C120.26535 (15)0.44447 (3)0.10676 (5)0.01917 (11)
C140.77823 (15)0.48161 (2)0.37589 (5)0.01896 (11)
C180.26524 (18)0.29999 (3)0.47953 (5)0.02301 (12)
H130.202 (2)0.3529 (4)0.1536 (7)0.036 (2)
H100.657 (3)0.5586 (4)0.2342 (7)0.042 (3)
H20.662 (2)0.2909 (4)0.1761 (7)0.039 (2)
H40.340 (3)0.1233 (4)0.3007 (8)0.046 (3)
H110.358 (3)0.5389 (5)0.0775 (9)0.055 (3)
H120.121 (3)0.4359 (4)0.0404 (8)0.043 (3)
H30.560 (3)0.1790 (5)0.1640 (8)0.045 (3)
H70.635 (3)0.3758 (4)0.3898 (8)0.042 (3)
H161.001 (4)0.5449 (6)0.4513 (10)0.039 (3)
H18A0.043 (3)0.2800 (6)0.5101 (10)0.070 (4)
H18B0.199 (5)0.3458 (5)0.4672 (10)0.093 (6)
H18C0.466 (3)0.2985 (8)0.5334 (9)0.089 (5)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cl170.02704 (7)0.01987 (6)0.02118 (8)−0.00156 (5)0.00511 (5)0.00733 (5)
C50.0188 (2)0.0144 (2)0.0168 (3)−0.00081 (16)0.00133 (19)0.00219 (18)
C60.0194 (2)0.0147 (2)0.0134 (2)−0.00062 (16)0.00050 (19)0.00098 (18)
C80.0197 (2)0.0135 (2)0.0132 (2)−0.00254 (16)−0.00056 (18)−0.00060 (17)
C20.0249 (3)0.0176 (2)0.0144 (3)−0.00347 (19)0.0033 (2)0.0002 (2)
C10.0226 (2)0.0138 (2)0.0137 (3)−0.00380 (17)−0.00006 (19)0.00040 (18)
C40.0251 (3)0.0138 (2)0.0199 (3)−0.00124 (17)0.0027 (2)0.00004 (19)
C90.0187 (2)0.0128 (2)0.0146 (2)−0.00135 (16)−0.00103 (19)−0.00116 (17)
O160.0437 (3)0.01627 (18)0.0208 (2)−0.00765 (17)−0.0076 (2)−0.00184 (17)
C110.0278 (3)0.0165 (2)0.0179 (3)0.00172 (19)−0.0031 (2)0.0022 (2)
N70.0388 (3)0.0147 (2)0.0149 (2)−0.00749 (18)−0.0045 (2)0.00098 (17)
C130.0196 (2)0.0160 (2)0.0148 (3)−0.00141 (17)−0.00178 (19)−0.00154 (18)
O150.0505 (3)0.01728 (19)0.0180 (2)−0.00828 (18)−0.0106 (2)−0.00045 (16)
C100.0240 (2)0.0132 (2)0.0182 (3)−0.00090 (18)−0.0019 (2)0.00082 (19)
C30.0279 (3)0.0167 (2)0.0172 (3)−0.00086 (19)0.0038 (2)−0.0019 (2)
C120.0222 (2)0.0184 (2)0.0162 (3)0.00175 (18)−0.0037 (2)−0.0005 (2)
C140.0264 (3)0.0137 (2)0.0161 (3)−0.00261 (17)−0.0035 (2)−0.00178 (19)
C180.0300 (3)0.0226 (3)0.0166 (3)0.0012 (2)0.0029 (2)−0.0015 (2)
H130.040 (6)0.040 (5)0.027 (7)−0.011 (5)−0.002 (5)−0.012 (5)
H100.051 (6)0.032 (6)0.041 (7)−0.007 (5)−0.005 (5)0.004 (5)
H20.046 (6)0.038 (6)0.033 (7)−0.004 (5)0.010 (5)−0.002 (5)
H40.070 (7)0.020 (5)0.052 (8)−0.002 (5)0.025 (6)−0.003 (5)
H110.074 (8)0.033 (6)0.057 (9)0.008 (5)−0.008 (6)0.006 (6)
H120.052 (6)0.033 (6)0.041 (7)−0.001 (4)−0.013 (5)0.004 (5)
H30.064 (7)0.031 (6)0.040 (8)−0.001 (5)−0.002 (6)−0.007 (5)
H70.069 (9)0.023 (6)0.032 (8)−0.010 (5)−0.003 (6)−0.008 (5)
H160.053 (8)0.037 (7)0.024 (8)−0.002 (6)−0.007 (7)−0.002 (6)
H18A0.063 (8)0.080 (9)0.071 (11)−0.015 (7)0.036 (7)−0.023 (8)
H18B0.201 (18)0.029 (7)0.051 (11)0.024 (8)0.022 (11)−0.008 (6)
H18C0.070 (9)0.145 (14)0.051 (10)0.048 (9)−0.014 (7)−0.054 (9)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cl17—C51.7373 (6)O16—C141.3136 (7)
C5—C61.3933 (8)O16—H160.983 (14)
C5—C41.3850 (9)C11—C101.3761 (9)
C6—C11.4103 (9)C11—C121.3957 (9)
C6—C181.4957 (9)C11—H111.085 (10)
C8—C91.4217 (7)N7—H71.019 (10)
C8—N71.3679 (8)C13—C121.3789 (8)
C8—C131.4064 (8)C13—H131.089 (9)
C2—C11.3965 (9)O15—C141.2355 (8)
C2—C31.3855 (9)C10—H101.088 (9)
C2—H21.081 (10)C3—H31.098 (10)
C1—N71.3985 (7)C12—H121.078 (10)
C4—C31.3865 (10)C18—H18A1.087 (12)
C4—H41.086 (9)C18—H18B1.048 (11)
C9—C101.4019 (8)C18—H18C1.052 (11)
C9—C141.4625 (8)
C6—C5—Cl17119.20 (5)C1—N7—C8129.34 (5)
C4—C5—Cl17117.59 (4)H7—N7—C8113.1 (7)
C4—C5—C6123.21 (6)H7—N7—C1117.5 (7)
C1—C6—C5117.11 (6)C12—C13—C8120.91 (5)
C18—C6—C5121.33 (6)H13—C13—C8119.5 (6)
C18—C6—C1121.55 (5)H13—C13—C12119.6 (6)
N7—C8—C9120.11 (5)C11—C10—C9121.44 (5)
C13—C8—C9117.85 (5)H10—C10—C9118.6 (6)
C13—C8—N7122.00 (5)H10—C10—C11119.9 (6)
C3—C2—C1120.37 (6)C4—C3—C2120.55 (6)
H2—C2—C1118.9 (6)H3—C3—C2120.6 (6)
H2—C2—C3120.7 (6)H3—C3—C4118.8 (6)
C2—C1—C6120.31 (5)C13—C12—C11121.20 (6)
N7—C1—C6117.43 (6)H12—C12—C11120.0 (5)
N7—C1—C2122.09 (6)H12—C12—C13118.7 (5)
C3—C4—C5118.43 (5)O16—C14—C9115.61 (5)
H4—C4—C5119.2 (6)O15—C14—C9123.51 (5)
H4—C4—C3122.4 (6)O15—C14—O16120.88 (6)
C10—C9—C8119.68 (5)H18A—C18—C6111.5 (8)
C14—C9—C8121.91 (5)H18B—C18—C6113.2 (8)
C14—C9—C10118.41 (5)H18B—C18—H18A104.1 (13)
H16—O16—C14110.9 (8)H18C—C18—C6114.1 (7)
C12—C11—C10118.83 (6)H18C—C18—H18A106.5 (13)
H11—C11—C10120.7 (6)H18C—C18—H18B106.8 (13)
H11—C11—C12120.5 (6)
Cl17—C5—C6—C1179.07 (4)C6—C1—N7—C8−142.97 (5)
Cl17—C5—C6—C18−0.77 (5)C8—C9—C10—C111.22 (7)
Cl17—C5—C4—C3−179.13 (4)C8—C9—C14—O16176.88 (6)
C5—C6—C1—C2−0.01 (6)C8—C9—C14—O15−3.68 (7)
C5—C6—C1—N7−175.43 (5)C8—N7—C1—C241.71 (8)
C5—C4—C3—C20.17 (7)C8—C13—C12—C11−0.37 (7)
C6—C1—C2—C30.94 (6)C9—C10—C11—C121.17 (8)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N7—H7···O151.019 (11)1.800 (10)2.6469 (7)138.0 (8)
O16—H16···O15i0.998 (14)1.640 (14)2.6381 (8)179.0 (12)
Symmetry code: (i) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for structures of forms I and II determined by Andersen et al. (1989) top
FormD—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
I (KAXXAI01)N7—H7···O150.792.022.676141
O16—H16···O15i0.971.692.648170
II (KAXXAI)N7—H7···O150.841.962.653139
O16—H16···O15ii0.931.722.648176
Symmetry codes: (i) -x, 1 - y, 1 - z; (ii) 2 - x, 1 - y, 1 - z.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors thank David Sage and Philip Muwanga for their assistance in using 4Sight to analyse the structures and prepare the figures.

Funding information

Funding for this research was provided by: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (grant No. EP/K039547/1).

References

First citationAndersen, K. V., Larsen, S., Alhede, B., Gelting, N. & Buchardt, O. (1989). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, pp. 1443–1447.  CSD CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationAng, L. S., Mohamed-Ibrahim, M. I. & Sulaiman, S. (2016). Phys. Res. Int., article ID 3537842.  Google Scholar
 First citationBlessing, R. H. (1995). Acta Cryst. A51, 33–38.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationBlundell, C. D., Packer, M. J. & Almond, A. (2013). Bioorg. Med. Chem. 21, 4976–4987.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
 First citationBouanga Boudiombo, J. S. & Jacobs, A. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 836–845.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationBourhis, L. J., Dolomanov, O. V., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2015). Acta Cryst. A71, 59–75.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationCapelli, S. C., Bürgi, H.-B., Dittrich, B., Grabowsky, S. & Jayatilaka, D. (2014). IUCrJ, 1, 361–379.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationCase, D. H., Srirambhatla, V. K., Guo, R., Watson, R. E., Price, L. S., Polyzois, H., Cockcroft, J. K., Florence, A. J., Tocher, D. A. & Price, S. L. (2018). Cryst. Growth Des. 18, 5322–5331.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationDolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationDu, W., Cruz-Cabeza, A. J., Woutersen, S., Davey, R. J. & Yin, Q. (2015). Chem. Sci. 6, 3515–3524.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
 First citationDunning, T. H. (1989). J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1007–1023.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
 First citationFábián, L., Hamill, N., Eccles, K. S., Moynihan, H. A., Maguire, A. R., McCausland, L. & Lawrence, S. E. (2011). Cryst. Growth Des. 11, 3522–3528.  Google Scholar
 First citationFugel, M., Jayatilaka, D., Hupf, E., Overgaard, J., Hathwar, V. R., Macchi, P., Turner, M. J., Howard, J. A. K., Dolomanov, O. V., Puschmann, H., Iversen, B. B., Bürgi, H.-B. & Grabowsky, S. (2018). IUCrJ, 5, 32–44.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationGroom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationLipsitz, R. S. & Tjandra, N. (2004). Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 33, 387–413.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
 First citationLópez-Mejías, V., Kampf, J. W. & Matzger, A. J. (2009). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 4554–4555.  Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
 First citationMattei, A. & Li, T. (2012). Pharm. Res. 29, 460–470.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
 First citationMattei, A. & Li, T. (2014). Cryst. Growth Des. 14, 2709–2713.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationMattei, A., Mei, X., Miller, A. F. & Li, T. (2013). Cryst. Growth Des. 13, 3303–3307.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationRigaku OD (2017). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England.  Google Scholar
 First citationSheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS. University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.  Google Scholar
 First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
 First citationSiskos, M. G., Choudhary, M. I. & Gerothanassis, I. P. (2017). Molecules, 22, 415–446.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
 First citationSurov, A. O., Simagina, A. A., Manin, N. G., Kuzmina, L. G., Churakov, A. V. & Perlovich, G. L. (2015). Cryst. Growth Des. 15, 228–238.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
 First citationWittering, K. E., Agnew, L. R., Klapwijk, A. R., Robertson, K., Cousen, A. J. P., Cruickshank, D. L. & Wilson, C. C. (2015). CrystEngComm, 17, 3610–3618.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Volume 76| Part 9| September 2020| Pages 1421-1426
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989020010841
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
E-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds
RSS