research communications
of new formamidinium triiodide jointly refined by single-crystal XRD, Raman scattering spectroscopy and DFT assessment of hydrogen-bond network features
aLaboratory of New Materials for Solar Energetics, Faculty of Materials Science, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation, bDepartment of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation, cInstitute of Chemistry, Saint-Petersburg State University, 198504, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, and dInstitute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, 119991, Moscow, Russian Federation
*Correspondence e-mail: alexey.bor.tarasov@yandex.ru
A novel triiodide phase of the formamidinium cation, CH5N2+·I3−, crystallizes in the triclinic P at a temperature of 110 K. The structure consists of two independent isolated triiodide ions located on inversion centers. The centrosymmetric character of I3− was additionally confirmed by the observed pronounced peaks of symmetrical oscillations of I3− at 115–116 cm−1 in Raman scattering spectra. An additional structural feature is that each terminal iodine atom is connected with three neighboring planar formamidinium cations by N—H⋯I hydrogen bonding with the N—H⋯I bond length varying from 2.81 to 3.08 Å, forming a deformed two-dimensional framework of hydrogen bonds. A Mulliken population analysis showed that the calculated charges of hydrogen atoms correlate well with hydrogen-bond lengths. The crystal studied was refined as a three-component twin with domain ratios of 0.631 (1):0.211 (1):0.158 (1).
Keywords: polyiodides; formamidinium; formamidinium triiodide; reactive polyiodide melts; Raman spectroscopy; DFT; crystal structure.
CCDC reference: 2087353
1. Chemical context
Polyiodides are a large class of compounds with organic and inorganic cations and a great diversity of anion shapes varying from simple linear I3− up to I293– complexes (Svensson & Kloo, 2003). Such a great diversity of cations and anions allows one to tune the chemical and physical properties of the target compounds. Consequently, polyiodides have attracted great interest for a wide set of applications, such as dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC) (O`Regan & Grätzel, 1991; Jeon et al., 2011), different electrochemical devices (Weinstein et al., 2008; Weng et al., 2017) and light-polarizing materials (Kahr et al., 2009).
Another recently proposed prospective application of polyiodides is to use liquid methylammonium and formamidinium polyiodides as a precursor for the fabrication of light-absorbing materials for perovskite solar cells (Petrov, Belich et al., 2017). Whereas the application of formamidinium polyiodides was shown to be successful for scalable fabrication of solar cells with efficiencies over 17% (Turkevych et al., 2019), the structures of formamidinium polyiodides have not been studied so far.
In this work, we investigated the features of the new structure of the single-crystalline CH5N2+·I3− (I, FAI3) phase by means of Raman scattering spectroscopy and DFT calculations.
2. Structural commentary
Dark-red transparent rhombic-shaped single crystals (Fig. 1a) were obtained by slow heating of preliminary powdered stoichiometric FAI/I2 (FA = CH5N2+) mixture up to 355–358 K. Such a temperature range allowed us to obtain well-shaped single crystals as a result of recrystallization from the liquid state near its melting point, which was determined to be Tm = 360 K by visual thermal analysis.
FAI3 was found to crystallize in a triclinic P. The structure (Fig. 1b) consists of two types of isolated centrosymmetric triiodide ions (D∞h point symmetry) located on centers of inversion. Therefore, only centrosymmetric I3− anions are present, which is rare for structures with relatively small cations such as formamidinium (Svensson & Kloo, 2003; Gabes & Gerding, 1972). For instance, in the CsI3 the I3− anion is asymmetric (Cs point symmetry) with ∠(I—I—I) = 178° (Runsink et al., 1972). For a similar CH3NH3I/I2 system, the CH3NH3I3 structure was not isolated (Petrov et al., 2019).
The centrosymmetric character of the I3− anions in FAI3 was confirmed by Raman scattering spectroscopy. The Raman spectrum recorded using a 633 nm laser (Fig. 2) contains a pronounced peak of ν1(I3−) symmetrical oscillations at 116 cm−1 with an additional 235 cm−1 2ν1(I3−) peak and an asymmetrical ν3(I3−) component at 126 cm−1 (Svensson & Kloo, 2003). The latter might be observed because of the presence of two types of I3− units in the structure with different environments. In addition, no splitting of symmetric oscillations is observed in the Raman spectrum because of the very small difference between the two types of I3− in the structure.
The first of the two types of I3− anions in FAI3 [d(I1—I2) = 2.9165 (14) Å] is connected with three neighboring planar formamidinium cations by N—H⋯I hydrogen bonding with the bond length varying from 2.81 to 3.08 Å (Table 1), which is similar to the distances in formamidinium iodide (Petrov, Goodilin et al., 2017) as well as in other polyiodides (Petrov et al., 2019; Said et al., 2006; van Megen & Reiss, 2013). The second type of I3− anions are connected by two N—H⋯I hydrogen bonds of slightly reduced length and a relatively less strong C—H⋯I hydrogen bond [d(CH1A⋯I4) = 3.03 Å]. Such a difference, however, does not change significantly the distance between the central and terminal iodine atoms [2.9165 (14) vs 2.9209 (14) Å].
A Mulliken population analysis showed that charges of hydrogen atoms forming a single hydrogen bond with a terminal iodine atom is +0.152 for atom H1A, which is connected with carbon, whereas it is +0.171 for atom H2A connected with nitrogen (Table 1), which correlates with the corresponding hydrogen-bond lengths [d(CH1A⋯I4) = 3.03 Å vs d(NH2A··I2) = 2.81 Å]. For the H2B hydrogen atom, the high atomic charge (+0.189) is distributed by two hydrogen bonds. An analysis of the Bader atomic charges for the isolated cation also shows a higher charge for the H2A atom in comparison with H1A (Table 2), which correlates well with the hydrogen-bond lengths.
|
Besides, the FAI3 structure can be represented as a pseudocubic close-packed structure with both iodine and formamidinium units in the close-packing layers (Fig. 3). In the discussed each center of mass of the formamidinium cation and each iodine have 12 neighbors in the first coordination sphere, resulting in a distorted cuboctahedra occupancy, which is typical for pseudocubic close-packing. In comparison, the formamidinium iodide structure can be described as a pseudohexagonal close-packed structure with both iodine and formamidinium units in the close-packing layers (Petrov, Goodilin et al., 2017).
3. Synthesis and crystallization
FAI and I2 were purchased from Dyesol (99.9% purity) and Ruskhim (99% purity) without further purification. To obtain single crystalline I, the stoichiometric FAI/I2 mixture was previously powdered in dry air glovebox. After that, the powdered mixture was slowly heated up to 355–358 K and the obtained single crystals were used for the of crystal structure.
4. Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure . All H atoms were found in an electron density-difference map and refined with isotropic displacement parameters. The crystal studied was refined as a three-component twin with domain ratios of 0.631 (1):0.211 (1):0.158 (1). The second and third major domains are rotated from the first one by ∼180° about reciprocal axes [101] and [110], respectively.
details are summarized in Table 3
|
5. DFT calculations
The electronic structure of the crystal FAI3 was calculated using the DMol3 module from the Materials Studio software package (Delley, 2000, 1990). In the applied DFT method, the PBE functional was used with the DNP 4.4 (double numerical plus polarization) basis set of atomic functions with all electron relativistic core treatment. The charges (Table 4) were derived according to Mulliken's scheme. The calculations were performed without further optimization.
|
Computations of Bader atomic charges were performed in the GAUSSIAN 09 program (Frisch et al., 2016) using density functional theory (PBE0) (Perdew et al., 1996) and the def-2-TZVP basis set. The geometry was optimized using the very tight optimization criteria and empirical dispersion corrections on the total energy (Grimme et al., 2010) with Becke–Johnson damping (D3) (Grimme et al., 2011).
Topological analysis of the ρ(r) function, calculations of the v(rbcp) and integration over interatomic zero-flux surfaces were performed using the AIMAll program (Keith, 2013).
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 2087353
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989021005673/dx2037sup1.cif
contains datablock I. DOI:Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989021005673/dx2037Isup2.hkl
Data collection: APEX3 (Bruker, 2019); cell
SAINT (Bruker, 2019); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2019); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2018 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).CH5N2+·I3− | Z = 2 |
Mr = 425.77 | F(000) = 368 |
Triclinic, P1 | Dx = 3.350 Mg m−3 |
a = 6.0767 (10) Å | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
b = 6.1886 (11) Å | Cell parameters from 899 reflections |
c = 11.727 (2) Å | θ = 3.5–29.1° |
α = 97.512 (6)° | µ = 11.01 mm−1 |
β = 100.345 (6)° | T = 110 K |
γ = 99.437 (6)° | Block, red |
V = 422.10 (13) Å3 | 0.26 × 0.19 × 0.08 mm |
Bruker D8 Quest with Photon III detector diffractometer | 4015 independent reflections |
Radiation source: micro-focus sealed X-ray tube | 2217 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
Detector resolution: 7.31 pixels mm-1 | θmax = 29.0°, θmin = 1.8° |
φ and ω shutterless scans | h = −8→8 |
Absorption correction: multi-scan (TWINABS; Bruker, 2019) | k = −8→8 |
Tmin = 0.044, Tmax = 0.092 | l = 0→15 |
4015 measured reflections |
Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods |
Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites |
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.084 | H-atom parameters constrained |
wR(F2) = 0.200 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0803P)2 + 4.4757P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
S = 0.98 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
4015 reflections | Δρmax = 2.45 e Å−3 |
60 parameters | Δρmin = −2.52 e Å−3 |
6 restraints |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refined as a three-component twin |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
I1 | 1.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.500000 | 0.0261 (5) | |
C1 | 0.515 (3) | 0.307 (3) | 0.216 (2) | 0.023 (4) | |
H1A | 0.481532 | 0.352625 | 0.141658 | 0.027* | |
N1 | 0.372 (4) | 0.157 (3) | 0.238 (2) | 0.051 (7) | |
H1B | 0.396378 | 0.110694 | 0.306643 | 0.061* | |
H1C | 0.246338 | 0.097725 | 0.185971 | 0.061* | |
I2 | 0.7214 (3) | 0.2999 (2) | 0.58692 (14) | 0.0318 (5) | |
N2 | 0.705 (3) | 0.406 (4) | 0.2867 (17) | 0.037 (5) | |
H2A | 0.741417 | 0.369243 | 0.356493 | 0.044* | |
H2B | 0.796631 | 0.510952 | 0.264606 | 0.044* | |
I3 | 1.000000 | 0.500000 | 1.000000 | 0.0258 (5) | |
I4 | 0.7825 (3) | 0.8407 (2) | 1.10514 (14) | 0.0313 (4) |
U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
I1 | 0.0268 (11) | 0.0239 (9) | 0.0270 (11) | 0.0069 (8) | 0.0049 (8) | 0.0001 (9) |
C1 | 0.020 (6) | 0.023 (6) | 0.026 (7) | 0.009 (5) | 0.006 (5) | −0.002 (5) |
N1 | 0.047 (14) | 0.029 (11) | 0.070 (18) | 0.005 (10) | 0.004 (12) | −0.003 (12) |
I2 | 0.0324 (8) | 0.0297 (8) | 0.0338 (10) | 0.0113 (6) | 0.0084 (7) | −0.0012 (7) |
N2 | 0.036 (12) | 0.055 (13) | 0.025 (11) | 0.009 (10) | 0.015 (9) | 0.011 (10) |
I3 | 0.0297 (11) | 0.0210 (9) | 0.0276 (11) | 0.0071 (8) | 0.0067 (8) | 0.0033 (8) |
I4 | 0.0377 (9) | 0.0262 (7) | 0.0328 (9) | 0.0128 (6) | 0.0107 (7) | 0.0018 (7) |
I1—I2 | 2.9165 (14) | N1—H1C | 0.8800 |
I1—I2i | 2.9165 (14) | N2—H2A | 0.8800 |
C1—N1 | 1.25 (3) | N2—H2B | 0.8800 |
C1—N2 | 1.30 (3) | I3—I4 | 2.9209 (14) |
C1—H1A | 0.9500 | I3—I4ii | 2.9209 (14) |
N1—H1B | 0.8800 | ||
I2—I1—I2i | 180.0 | H1B—N1—H1C | 120.0 |
N1—C1—N2 | 125 (3) | C1—N2—H2A | 120.0 |
N1—C1—H1A | 117.3 | C1—N2—H2B | 120.0 |
N2—C1—H1A | 117.3 | H2A—N2—H2B | 120.0 |
C1—N1—H1B | 120.0 | I4—I3—I4ii | 180.0 |
C1—N1—H1C | 120.0 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x+2, −y, −z+1; (ii) −x+2, −y+1, −z+2. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A | H charge |
C1—H1A···I4i | 0.95 | 3.03 | 3.80 (2) | 138.2 | 0.152 |
N1—H1B···I2ii | 0.88 | 3.01 | 3.73 (2) | 139.9 | 0.164 |
N1—H1C···I4iii | 0.88 | 2.92 | 3.74 (2) | 154.9 | 0.160 |
N2—H2A···I2 | 0.88 | 2.81 | 3.65 (2) | 160.5 | 0.171 |
N2—H2B···I2iv | 0.88 | 3.08 | 3.609 (19) | 120.6 | 0.189 |
N2—H2B···I4v | 0.88 | 2.94 | 3.66 (2) | 140.1 | 0.189 |
Symmetry codes: (i) -x + 1, -y + 1, -z + 1; (ii) -x + 1, -y, -z + 1; (iii) x - 1, y - 1, z - 1; (iv) -x, y, z - 1; (v) -x + 2, -y + 1, -z + 1. |
C1 | +1.31 | H1C | +0.50 |
H1A | +0.18 | N2 | -1.23 |
N1 | -1.23 | H2A | +0.48 |
H1B | +0.48 | H2B | +0.50 |
C1 | +0.003 | I2 | -0.388 |
H1A | +0.152 | N2 | -0.049 |
N1 | +0.019 | H2A | +0.171 |
H1B | +0.164 | H2B | +0.189 |
H1C | +0.160 | I3 | -0.044 |
I1 | -0.030 | I4 | -0.383 |
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Ekaterina Marchenko for her advice and help with the crystal-structure analysis and to Alexey Grishko for the Raman spectroscopy measurements. DFT calculations performed using the Materials Studio software package were carried out using computational resources provided by the Resource Center `Computer Center of SPbU'. KL acknowledges partial support from the Moscow State University Program of Development. AP and EG thank colleagues from the Joint Research Center for Physical Methods of Research of IGIC RAS for their valuable assistance in the sample analysis.
Funding information
Funding for this research was provided by the Russian Science Foundation (grant No. 18-73-10224).
References
Bruker (2019). APEX3, SAINT and TWINABS. Bruker AXS Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Delley, B. (1990). J. Chem. Phys. 92, 508–517. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Delley, B. (2000). J. Chem. Phys. 113, 7756–7764. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Frisch, M. J., Trucks, G. W., Schlegel, H. B., Scuseria, G. E., Robb, M. A., Cheeseman, J. R., Scalmani, G., Barone, V., Petersson, G. A., Nakatsuji, H., Li, X., Caricato, M., Marenich, A., Bloino, J., Janesko, B. G., Gomperts, R., Mennucci, B., Hratchian, H. P., Ort, J. V. & Fox, D. J. (2016). GAUSSIAN 09. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA. Google Scholar
Gabes, W. & Gerding, H. (1972). J. Mol. Struct. 14, 267–279. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. (2010). J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S. & Goerigk, L. (2011). J. Comput. Chem. 32, 1456–1465. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jeon, S., Jo, Y., Kim, K.-J., Jun, Y. & Han, C.-H. (2011). ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 3, 512–516. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kahr, B., Freudenthal, J., Phillips, S. & Kaminsky, W. (2009). Science, 324, 1407–1407. Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Keith, T.A. (2013). AIMAll. TK Gristmill Software: Overland Park, KS, USA. https://aim.tkgristmill.com Google Scholar
Megen, M. van & Reiss, G. (2013). Inorganics, 1, 3–13. Google Scholar
O'Regan, B. & Grätzel, M. (1991). Nature, 353, 737–740. CAS Google Scholar
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. (1996). Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868. CrossRef PubMed CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Petrov, A. A., Belich, N. A., Grishko, A. Y., Stepanov, N. M., Dorofeev, S. G., Maksimov, E. G., Shevelkov, A. V., Zakeeruddin, S. M., Graetzel, M., Tarasov, A. B. & Goodilin, E. A. (2017). Mater. Horiz. 4, 625–632. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Petrov, A. A., Fateev, S. A., Zubavichus, Y. V., Dorovatovskii, P. V., Khrustalev, V. N., Zvereva, I. A., Petrov, A. V., Goodilin, E. A. & Tarasov, A. B. (2019). J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 5776–5780. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Petrov, A. A., Goodilin, E. A., Tarasov, A. B., Lazarenko, V. A., Dorovatovskii, P. V. & Khrustalev, V. N. (2017). Acta Cryst. E73, 569–572. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Runsink, J., Swen-Walstra, S. & Migchelsen, T. (1972). Acta Cryst. B28, 1331–1335. CSD CrossRef ICSD IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Said, F. F., Bazinet, P., Ong, T.-G., Yap, G. P. A. & Richeson, D. S. (2006). Cryst. Growth Des. 6, 258–266. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Svensson, P. H. & Kloo, L. (2003). Chem. Rev. 103, 1649–1684. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Turkevych, I., Kazaoui, S., Belich, N. A., Grishko, A. Y., Fateev, S. A., Petrov, A. A., Urano, T., Aramaki, S., Kosar, S., Kondo, M., Goodilin, E. A., Graetzel, M. & Tarasov, A. B. (2019). Nature Nanotech, 14, 57–63. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Weinstein, L., Yourey, W., Gural, J. & Amatucci, G. G. (2008). J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, A590–A598. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Weng, G.-M., Li, Z., Cong, G., Zhou, Y. & Lu, Y.-C. (2017). Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 735–741. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.