Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis study of (E)-1-(4-chloro­phen­yl)-N-(4-ferrocenylphen­yl)methanimine

Sghyar, R.; Moussaoui, O.; Sebbar, N.K.; Ait Elmachkouri, Y.; Irrou, E.; Hökelek, T.; Mague, J.T.; Bentama, A.; El hadrami, E.M.

doi:10.1107/S2056989021008033

Jerry P. Jasinski tribute

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 77| Part 9| September 2021| Pages 875-879

https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989021008033

Open

access

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis study of (E)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-N-(4-ferrocenylphenyl)methanimine

Riham Sghyar,^a ^* Oussama Moussaoui,^a Nada Kheira Sebbar,^b Younesse Ait Elmachkouri,^b Ezaddine Irrou,^b Tuncer Hökelek,^c Joel T. Mague,^d Abdesslam Bentama ^a and El Mestafa El hadrami ^a

^aLaboratory of Applied Organic Chemistry, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, Road Immouzer, BP 2202 Fez, Morocco, ^bApplied Chemistry and Environment Laboratory, Applied Bioorganic Chemistry Team, Faculty of Science, Ibn Zohr University, Agadir, Morocco, ^cDepartment of Physics, Hacettepe University, 06800 Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey, and ^dDepartment of Chemistry, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA
^*Correspondence e-mail: rihamsghyar2018@gmail.com

Edited by M. Zeller, Purdue University, USA (Received 5 July 2021; accepted 4 August 2021; online 10 August 2021)

The substituted cyclopentadienyl ring in the title molecule, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₈H₁₃ClN)], is nearly coplanar with the phenyl-1-(4-chlorophenyl)methanimine substituent, with dihedral angles between the planes of the phenylene ring and the Cp and 4-(chlorophenyl)methanimine units of 7.87 (19) and 9.23 (10)°, respectively. The unsubstituted cyclopentadienyl ring is rotationally disordered, the occupancy ratio for the two orientations refined to a 0.666 (7)/0.334 (7) ratio. In the crystal, the molecules pack in `bilayers' parallel to the ab plane with the ferrocenyl groups on the outer faces and the substituents directed towards the regions between them. The ferrocenyl groups are linked by C—H⋯π(ring) interactions. A Hirshfeld surface analysis of the crystal structure indicates that the most important contributions for the crystal packing are from H⋯H (46.1%), H⋯C/C⋯ H (35.4%) and H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H (13.8%) interactions. Thus C—H⋯π(ring) and van der Waals interactions are the dominant interactions in the crystal packing.

Keywords: crystal structure; ferrocenyl; imine; C—H⋯π(ring) interaction.

CCDC reference: 2101472

1. Chemical context

Compounds containing metallocene building units, and particularly ferrocene derivatives, have been studied extensively both in academic and industrial settings (Santos et al., 2017 ; Singh et al., 2019 ; Ong & Gasser, 2020 ). Owing to a favorable combination of chemical and physical properties, ferrocene derivatives are often biologically active, making them attractive pharmacophores for drug design and useful templates in medicinal chemistry research and therapeutic applications including as antioxidant (Bugarinović et al., 2018 ; Naz et al., 2020 ), anti-inflammatory (Yun Guo et al., 2019), antimalarial (Peter & Aderibigbe, 2019 ; Xiao et al., 2020 ), antileishmanial (Rauf et al., 2016 ), anticancer (Wang et al., 2020 ; Ismail et al., 2020 ), antiplasmodial (García-Barrantes et al., 2013 ), anticonvulsant (Adil et al., 2018 ) and antimicrobial (Damljanović et al., 2009 ) agents. A wide range of therapeutic activities is also associated with ferrocenyl Schiff bases, which have shown exceptionally high activities against pathogenic microbes (Chohan & Praveen, 2000 ; Chohan et al. 2001 ), and these molecules exhibit potent antioxidant and DNA-protecting properties (Li & Liu, 2011 ). The potential uses of ferrocenyl Schiff bases also include the synthesis of materials for use in electrochemical sensors (Jo et al., 2007 ), non-linear optical materials (Yu et al., 2015 ), luminescent systems (Fery-Forgues & Delavaux-Nicot, 2000 ), homogeneous catalysis (Gibson et al., 2006 ), conducting polymers (Tice et al., 2007 ) and organometallic polymers (Xue et al., 2001 ). The coordination of a variety of metal centers to produce new complexes of ferrocene-derived Schiff base ligands has been studied for their interesting antibacterial activities compared to the free ligands (Chohan & Praveen, 2000). Ferrocenyl liquid crystalline Schiff bases, also known as ferrocenomesogens, present interesting magnetic properties such as paramagnetism and control of molecular orientation in magnetic fields (Seshadri et al., 2007 ; Onofrei et al., 2012 ).

In a continuation of our research towards the synthesis of ferrocene-derived Schiff bases, we have been using 4-ferrocenyl aniline as an intermediate in the synthesis of new heterocyclic systems and have studied the condensation reactions between 4-ferrocenyl aniline and 4-chlorobenzaldehyde. The title compound (I) was obtained and characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction techniques as well as by Hirshfeld surface analysis.

2. Structural commentary

4-Ferrocenyl aniline was synthesized according to a reported procedure (Hu et al., 2001; Ali et al., 2013) and single crystals of its condensation product with 4-chlorobenzaldehyde were obtained by recrystallization from methanol (Fig. 1). Bond distances and angles are in the expected ranges and agree well with values observed for similar compounds (see e.g. Kumar et al., 2020 ; Shabbir et al., 2017 ; Toro et al., 2018 ). The unsubstituted cyclopentadienyl ring, C1–C5, was found to be rotationally disordered, with a refined occupancy of 0.666 (7) for the major moiety. The two Cp rings are not quite parallel as there is a 2.7 (5)° dihedral angle between them. The substituted cyclopentadienyl ring, C6–C10, is nearly coplanar with the phenyl-1-(4-chlorophenyl)methanimine substituent. The Cp ring is inclined by 16.8 (2)° with respect to the C11–C16 phenylene ring. The imine fragment is essentially coplanar with the chlorophenyl unit, with an r.m.s. deviation from planarity of only 0.05 Å. The dihedral angle between the phenylene ring and the plane of the 4-chlorophenyl-methanimine unit, N1/C17–C23, is 9.23 (10)°. This renders the entire molecule, with the exception of the Fe atom and the unsubstituted Cp ring, mostly flat.

Figure 1
The asymmetric unit of the title compound with the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level. Only the major orientation of the disordered cyclopentadienyl ring is shown.

3. Supramolecular features

In the crystal, molecules are arranged in double layers perpendicular to the c axis with alternating ferrocenyl and Schiff base segments, with the ferrocenyl groups facing towards the outside of each layer and bordering the ferrocene moieties of the neighboring layer, and the phenyl-1-(4-chlorophenyl)methanimine substituents at the center of the double layers with the substituents from both sides of the layer interdigitating with each other (Figs. 2 and 3). Two double layers are found within the boundaries of the orthorhombic Pbca unit cell. The phenyl-1-(4-chlorophenyl)methanimine substituents are thus all arranged parallel to each other (at the center of each layer). They are, however, rotated along their long axis with respect to each other, and despite their nearly coplanar nature that predestines them for π-stacking interactions, no such interactions are observed in the solid state. Indeed, directional interactions are sparse in the structure of the title compound. Ferrocenyl groups are tied together by C—H⋯π interactions, facilitated by neighboring ferrocene units within each layer being roughly 90° rotated against each other. Cp-H atoms thus point towards the π-system of neighboring Cp rings. The shortest C—H⋯π interactions are between H5 and H7 towards the C atoms C7 and C10 of the substituted Cp ring at −x + $[{1\over 2}]$ , y + $[{1\over 2}]$ , z (H⋯C distances are 2.77 and 2.73 Å, respectively), and between H3 and H10 towards C atoms C4 and C3 at −x + $[{3\over 2}]$ , y − $[{1\over 2}]$ , z (H⋯C distances are 2.84 and 2.82 Å, respectively). The shortest C—H centroid interaction is for C7—H7⋯Cg2 [Cg2 is the centroid of the substituted Cp ring, C6–C10, at −x + $[{1\over 2}]$ , y + $[{1\over 2}]$ , z; H⋯Cg2 = 2.76 Å, C7⋯Cg2 = 3.683 (4) Å, C7—H7⋯Cg2 = 154°]. Also present is a C22—H22⋯Cg5 interaction [Cg5 is the centroid of the C18–C23 ring at −x + $[{1\over 2}]$ , y + $[{1\over 2}]$ , z with H⋯Cg5 = 2.95 Å, C22⋯Cg5 = 3.605 (4) Å, C22—H22⋯Cg5 = 127°] and a weak C4—H4⋯Cl1 hydrogen bond (Cl1 at −x + 1, y + $[{1\over 2}]$ , −z + $[{1\over 2}]$ , with H4⋯Cl1 = 2.82 Å, C4⋯Cl1 = 3.66 (4) Å and C4—H4⋯Cl1 = 142°).

Figure 2
Detail of the intermolecular interactions. C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds and C—H⋯π(ring) interactions are depicted, respectively, by green and orange dashed lines. Non-interacting H atoms are omitted for clarity.

Figure 3
Packing viewed along the b-axis direction with intermolecular interactions depicted as in Fig. 2

. Non-interacting H atoms are omitted for clarity.

4. Hirshfeld surface analysis

In order to visualize the intermolecular interactions in the crystal of the title compound, a Hirshfeld surface (HS) analysis (Hirshfeld, 1977 ) was carried out using Crystal Explorer 17.5 (Turner et al., 2017 ). In the HS plotted over d_norm (Fig. 4), the white surface indicates contacts with distances equal to the sum of van der Waals radii, and the red and blue colors indicate distances shorter (in close contact) or longer (distinct contact) than the van der Waals radii, respectively (Venkatesan et al., 2016 ). The bright-red spots indicate their roles as the respective donors and/or acceptors. The blue regions indicate positive electrostatic potentials (hydrogen-bond donors), while the red regions indicate negative electrostatic potentials (hydrogen-bond acceptors). The shape-index of the HS is a tool to visualize π–π stacking by the presence of adjacent red and blue triangles; the absence of adjacent red and/or blue triangles, Fig. 5, indicates that there are no π–π interactions. The overall two-dimensional fingerprint plot is shown in Fig. 6a, and those delineated into H⋯H, H⋯C/C⋯H, H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H, H⋯N/N⋯H, C⋯C, C⋯N/N⋯C and Cl⋯Cl contacts (McKinnon et al., 2007 ) are illustrated in Fig. 6b–h, respectively, together with their relative contributions to the Hirshfeld surface. The most important interaction is H⋯H, contributing 46.1% to the overall crystal packing, which is reflected in Fig. 6b as widely scattered points of high density due to the large hydrogen content of the molecule. The presence of C—H⋯π interactions, as described in the Supramolecular features section, is indicated by pairs of characteristic wings in the fingerprint plot representing H⋯C/C⋯H contacts, Fig. 6c. These H⋯C/C⋯H contacts represent a 35.4% contribution to the HS. Pairs of scattered points of spikes are seen in the fingerprint plot delineated into H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H contacts, Fig. 6d, with a 13.8% contribution to the HS. H⋯N/N⋯H contacts, Fig. 6e, contribute only 4.0% to the HS. Finally, C⋯C (Fig. 6f), C⋯N/N⋯C (Fig. 6g) and Cl⋯Cl contacts (Fig. 6h) have only 0.5%, 0.2% and 0.1% contributions.

Figure 4
View of the three-dimensional Hirshfeld surface of the title compound, plotted over d_norm in the range −0.1325 to 1.1632 a.u. The red dots indicate the C—H⋯π(ring) interactions involving the ferrocene and the C18–C23 ring.

Figure 5
Hirshfeld surface of the title compound plotted over shape-index.

Figure 6
The full two-dimensional fingerprint plots for the title compound, showing (a) all interactions, and delineated into (b) H⋯H, (c) H⋯C/C⋯H, (d) H⋯Cl/Cl⋯H, (e) H⋯N/N⋯H, (f) C⋯C, (g) C⋯N/N⋯C and (h) Cl⋯Cl interactions. The d_i and d_e values are the closest internal and external distances (in Å) from given points on the Hirshfeld surface.

The Hirshfeld surface analysis confirms the importance of H-atom contacts in establishing the packing. The large number of H⋯H and H⋯C/C⋯H interactions suggest that C—H⋯π and van der Waals interactions play the major role in the crystal packing (Hathwar et al., 2015 ).

5. Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) (Groom et al., 2016, updated to May 29, 2021) found three closely related, ferrocene-substituted Schiff base compounds: (A: Jakku et al., 2020; B: Shabbir et al., 2017; C: Toro et al., 2018; Fig. 7).

Figure 7
Related ferrocene–Schiff base complexes.

6. Synthesis and crystallization

4-Ferrocenyl aniline was synthesized according to a reported procedure (Hu et al., 2001; Ali et al., 2013). In a 250 mL round-bottom flask, 1.0 mmol of 4-ferrocenyl aniline in 15 mL of dried methanol was mixed with an equimolar amount of 4-chlorophenyl aldehyde in 15 mL of dried methanol. The mixture was agitated under reflux, the progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC, and the desired product was formed within 6 h. The solvent was removed under vacuum and the solid that was obtained was recrystallized from methanol (yield: 87%) to yield brown crystals, m.p. 210 K. ¹H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 4.08 (s, 5H, Cp C₅H₅); 4.36 (t, 2H, Cp C₅H₄, J = 3.39) ; 4.68 (t, 2H, Cp C₅H₄, J = 3.45); 7.20 (d, 2H, C₆H_4-ar, J = 8.4); 7.48 (d, 2H, C₆H_4-ar, J = 8.43); 7.53 (d, 2H, C₆H_4-ar, J = 8.43); 7.88 (d, 2H, C₆H_4-ar, J = 8.44) ; 8.52 (s, 1H, CH=N). ¹³C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 66.42 (2C, C₅H₄); 69.05 (2C, C₅H₄); 69,64 (5C, C₅H₅); 84.80 (Cq, C₅H₄); 121.10 (2C, CH_-Ar); 126.76 (2C, CH_-Ar); 129.09 (2C, CH_-Ar); 129.87 (2C, CH_-Ar); 134.92 (1Cq, Ar_-CH=N); 137.20 (1Cq, Ar_-Cl); 137.72 (1Cq, Ar_-C5H4); 149.21 (1Cq, Ar_-N=CH) ; 157.62 (1C, CH=N).

7. Refinement

Crystal, data collection and refinement details are presented in Table 1. Analysis of 1284 reflections having I/σ(I) > 15 and chosen from the full data set with CELL_NOW (Sheldrick, 2008 ) showed the crystal to be either split or non-merohedrally twinned. The top choice of unit cell had parameters a = 7.662, b = 10.009, c = 45.974 Å, α = 90.05, β = 90.21, γ = 89.97° (unrefined) with a second component (14%) rotated 180° about the b axis. To eliminate possible bias, the raw data were processed as triclinic using the multi-component version of SAINT (Bruker, 2020 ) under control of the two-component orientation file generated by CELL_NOW, leading to an orthorhombic cell within experimental error and a twin matrix of: −0.99988 − 0.00291 − 0.00258 − 0.00684 0.99978 0.00453 0.09083 0.09422 − 0.99967, thus indicating presence of two separate domains not related by twinning (`split crystal'). The data were corrected for absorption using TWINABS (Sheldrick, 2009 ), which was also used to extract a single-component reflection file from the two-component intensity data, which was used to determine the space group and solve the structure. The resulting space group of Pbca required transformation of the original cell by the matrix: 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 −1. Trial final refinements with the single-component reflection file and with the complete two-component data showed the former to be more satisfactory on the basis of a lower values for R1 and su's on derived parameters as well as smaller residual features about the Fe atom.

Table 1
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	[Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₈H₁₃ClN)]
M_r	399.68
Crystal system, space group	Orthorhombic, Pbca
Temperature (K)	150
a, b, c (Å)	10.0991 (18), 7.7277 (14), 45.979 (8)
V (Å³)	3588.3 (11)
Z	8
Radiation type	Mo Kα
μ (mm⁻¹)	1.00
Crystal size (mm)	0.13 × 0.12 × 0.04

Data collection
Diffractometer	Bruker D8 QUEST PHOTON 3 diffractometer
Absorption correction	Multi-scan (TWINABS; Sheldrick, 2009)
T_min, T_max	0.88, 0.96
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	12370, 4001, 2903
R_int	0.046
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.653

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.063, 0.118, 1.17
No. of reflections	4001
No. of parameters	233
H-atom treatment	H-atom parameters constrained
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.44, −0.38
Computer programs: APEX3 and SAINT (Bruker, 2020), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ), SHELXL2018/1 (Sheldrick, 2015b ), DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2012 ) and SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

H atoms attached to carbon were placed in calculated positions (C—H = 0.95–1.00 Å). All were included as riding contributions with isotropic displacement parameters 1.2–1.5 times those of the parent atoms. The unsubstituted cyclopentadienyl ring is rotationally disordered over two sets of sites with the two components refined as rigid pentagons (AFIX 56 constraint of SHELXL). ADPs of equivalent major and minor disordered C atoms were constrained to be identical. The occupancy ratio for the two orientations refined to a 0.666 (7)/0.334 (7) ratio.

Supporting information

CCDC reference: 2101472

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989021008033/zl5016sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989021008033/zl5016Isup2.hkl

Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989021008033/zl5016Isup3.cdx

checkCIF report

Computing details top

Data collection: APEX3 (Bruker, 2020); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2020); data reduction: SAINT (Bruker, 2020); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2018/1 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2012); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008).

(E)-1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-N-(4-ferrocenylphenyl)methanimine top

Crystal data top

[Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₈H₁₃ClN)]	D_x = 1.480 Mg m⁻³
M_r = 399.68	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Orthorhombic, Pbca	Cell parameters from 7602 reflections
a = 10.0991 (18) Å	θ = 2.7–27.6°
b = 7.7277 (14) Å	µ = 1.00 mm⁻¹
c = 45.979 (8) Å	T = 150 K
V = 3588.3 (11) Å³	Plate, orange
Z = 8	0.13 × 0.12 × 0.04 mm
F(000) = 1648

Data collection top

Bruker D8 QUEST PHOTON 3 diffractometer	4001 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube	2903 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromator	R_int = 0.046
Detector resolution: 7.3910 pixels mm^-1	θ_max = 27.6°, θ_min = 1.8°
ω scans	h = −13→12
Absorption correction: multi-scan (TWINABS; Sheldrick, 2009)	k = −10→9
T_min = 0.88, T_max = 0.96	l = −59→0
12370 measured reflections

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: full	Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.063	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F²) = 0.118	H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.17	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0177P)² + 8.9667P] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
4001 reflections	(Δ/σ)_max = 0.001
233 parameters	Δρ_max = 0.44 e Å⁻³
0 restraints	Δρ_min = −0.38 e Å⁻³

Special details top

Experimental. The diffraction data were obtained from 7 sets of frames, each of width 0.5° in ω, collected with scan parameters determined by the "strategy" routine in APEX3. The scan time was 40 sec/frame. Analysis of 1284 reflections having I/σ(I) > 15 and chosen from the full data set with CELL_NOW (Sheldrick, 2008) showed the crystal to non-merohedrally twinned. The top choice of unit cell had parameters a = 7.662, b = 10.009, c = 45.974 Å, α = 90.05, β = 90.21, γ = 89.97° (unrefined) with a second component (14%) rotated 180° about the b-axis. To eliminate possible bias, the raw data were processed as triclinic using the multi-component version of SAINT (Bruker, 2020) under control of the two-component orientation file generated by CELL_NOW leading to an orthorhombic cell within experinental error and a twin matrix of: -0.99988 -0.00291 -0.00258 -0.00684 0.99978 0.00453 0.09083 0.09422 -0.99967.

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F² against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F², conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F². The threshold expression of F² > 2sigma(F²) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F² are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. H-atoms attached to carbon were placed in calculated positions (C—H = 0.95 - 1.00 Å). All were included as riding contributions with isotropic displacement parameters 1.2 - 1.5 times those of the attached atoms. The C1···C5 ring is rotationally disordered over two orientations in a 0.666 (7)/0.334 (7) ratio. The two components were refined as rigid pentagons. Trial refinements with the single-component reflection file extracted from the full data set with TWINABS and with the complete two-component data showed the former to be more satisfactory on the basis of a lower values for R1 and su's on derived parameters as well as smaller residual features abot the Fe atom.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq	Occ. (<1)
Fe1	0.50398 (5)	0.66068 (7)	0.44481 (2)	0.02709 (15)
Cl1	0.35163 (12)	0.58417 (15)	0.14716 (2)	0.0460 (3)
N1	0.3450 (3)	0.5987 (4)	0.29393 (6)	0.0302 (7)
C1	0.5820 (7)	0.8567 (9)	0.46980 (8)	0.0357 (19)	0.666 (7)
H1	0.552750	0.889508	0.489834	0.043*	0.666 (7)
C2	0.6831 (5)	0.7360 (6)	0.46279 (12)	0.0310 (15)	0.666 (7)
H2	0.736892	0.667977	0.477030	0.037*	0.666 (7)
C3	0.6915 (5)	0.7248 (7)	0.43202 (13)	0.039 (2)	0.666 (7)
H3	0.753532	0.649277	0.420787	0.047*	0.666 (7)
C4	0.5956 (7)	0.8385 (9)	0.42001 (7)	0.046 (2)	0.666 (7)
H4	0.579632	0.859268	0.398829	0.056*	0.666 (7)
C5	0.5279 (6)	0.9201 (8)	0.44336 (14)	0.040 (2)	0.666 (7)
H5	0.455543	1.007747	0.441501	0.048*	0.666 (7)
C1A	0.6195 (16)	0.814 (2)	0.46947 (16)	0.0357 (19)	0.334 (7)
H1A	0.633804	0.802489	0.490908	0.043*	0.334 (7)
C2A	0.6952 (9)	0.7317 (14)	0.4474 (3)	0.0310 (15)	0.334 (7)
H2A	0.772102	0.652440	0.450570	0.037*	0.334 (7)
C3A	0.6450 (12)	0.7860 (18)	0.42003 (19)	0.039 (2)	0.334 (7)
H3A	0.678096	0.748136	0.400551	0.047*	0.334 (7)
C4A	0.5383 (11)	0.9017 (17)	0.4252 (3)	0.046 (2)	0.334 (7)
H4A	0.481684	0.957304	0.409988	0.056*	0.334 (7)
C5A	0.5226 (14)	0.9189 (19)	0.4557 (3)	0.040 (2)	0.334 (7)
H5A	0.454299	0.990947	0.465827	0.048*	0.334 (7)
C6	0.3865 (3)	0.5206 (5)	0.41718 (7)	0.0258 (8)
C7	0.3080 (4)	0.6077 (5)	0.43866 (7)	0.0297 (9)
H7	0.236759	0.694502	0.434743	0.036*
C8	0.3495 (4)	0.5481 (5)	0.46672 (8)	0.0339 (9)
H8	0.312783	0.587107	0.485821	0.041*
C9	0.4530 (4)	0.4280 (5)	0.46280 (8)	0.0319 (9)
H9	0.502053	0.367060	0.478674	0.038*
C10	0.4771 (4)	0.4098 (5)	0.43228 (7)	0.0279 (8)
H10	0.545311	0.333379	0.423122	0.034*
C11	0.3788 (4)	0.5450 (5)	0.38538 (7)	0.0271 (8)
C12	0.4825 (4)	0.4907 (5)	0.36759 (8)	0.0309 (9)
H12	0.559850	0.442818	0.376174	0.037*
C13	0.4749 (4)	0.5055 (5)	0.33747 (8)	0.0326 (9)
H13	0.546303	0.466509	0.325738	0.039*
C14	0.3630 (4)	0.5770 (5)	0.32443 (7)	0.0290 (8)
C15	0.2619 (4)	0.6370 (5)	0.34228 (7)	0.0309 (9)
H15	0.186873	0.691251	0.333770	0.037*
C16	0.2682 (4)	0.6192 (5)	0.37221 (7)	0.0300 (9)
H16	0.196511	0.658035	0.383888	0.036*
C17	0.4136 (4)	0.5112 (5)	0.27598 (8)	0.0318 (9)
H17	0.475449	0.428943	0.283162	0.038*
C18	0.3996 (4)	0.5342 (5)	0.24447 (7)	0.0267 (8)
C19	0.4920 (4)	0.4611 (5)	0.22554 (8)	0.0318 (9)
H19	0.564591	0.397826	0.233249	0.038*
C20	0.4793 (4)	0.4793 (5)	0.19553 (8)	0.0330 (9)
H20	0.543157	0.430314	0.182773	0.040*
C21	0.3729 (4)	0.5694 (5)	0.18472 (8)	0.0321 (9)
C22	0.2802 (4)	0.6460 (5)	0.20288 (8)	0.0323 (9)
H22	0.208362	0.709972	0.195003	0.039*
C23	0.2942 (4)	0.6279 (5)	0.23271 (8)	0.0316 (9)
H23	0.231255	0.679942	0.245323	0.038*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
Fe1	0.0214 (3)	0.0270 (3)	0.0329 (2)	−0.0033 (3)	0.0021 (2)	−0.0016 (2)
Cl1	0.0552 (7)	0.0485 (7)	0.0341 (5)	−0.0034 (6)	−0.0029 (5)	0.0010 (5)
N1	0.0298 (18)	0.0277 (18)	0.0332 (15)	−0.0038 (16)	−0.0029 (13)	0.0023 (13)
C1	0.034 (5)	0.028 (5)	0.045 (2)	−0.006 (4)	0.005 (2)	−0.011 (2)
C2	0.027 (3)	0.027 (3)	0.039 (4)	−0.010 (2)	−0.012 (3)	−0.003 (3)
C3	0.025 (4)	0.053 (5)	0.038 (4)	−0.017 (3)	0.004 (3)	−0.015 (3)
C4	0.045 (6)	0.052 (6)	0.042 (3)	−0.017 (5)	−0.005 (3)	0.012 (3)
C5	0.031 (3)	0.021 (3)	0.067 (7)	0.000 (2)	−0.005 (4)	0.010 (4)
C1A	0.034 (5)	0.028 (5)	0.045 (2)	−0.006 (4)	0.005 (2)	−0.011 (2)
C2A	0.027 (3)	0.027 (3)	0.039 (4)	−0.010 (2)	−0.012 (3)	−0.003 (3)
C3A	0.025 (4)	0.053 (5)	0.038 (4)	−0.017 (3)	0.004 (3)	−0.015 (3)
C4A	0.045 (6)	0.052 (6)	0.042 (3)	−0.017 (5)	−0.005 (3)	0.012 (3)
C5A	0.031 (3)	0.021 (3)	0.067 (7)	0.000 (2)	−0.005 (4)	0.010 (4)
C6	0.0174 (19)	0.026 (2)	0.0341 (18)	−0.0029 (16)	−0.0007 (14)	0.0006 (15)
C7	0.0172 (19)	0.030 (2)	0.0419 (19)	−0.0017 (17)	0.0034 (15)	0.0000 (16)
C8	0.030 (2)	0.038 (3)	0.0332 (18)	−0.010 (2)	0.0048 (16)	−0.0002 (16)
C9	0.027 (2)	0.034 (2)	0.0351 (18)	−0.0068 (19)	−0.0032 (15)	0.0058 (16)
C10	0.026 (2)	0.023 (2)	0.0356 (17)	−0.0020 (17)	−0.0034 (15)	0.0010 (15)
C11	0.021 (2)	0.023 (2)	0.0373 (18)	−0.0019 (17)	−0.0010 (15)	−0.0002 (15)
C12	0.022 (2)	0.035 (2)	0.0357 (18)	0.0002 (18)	−0.0021 (15)	0.0020 (16)
C13	0.027 (2)	0.037 (2)	0.0336 (18)	0.0003 (19)	0.0021 (15)	−0.0006 (16)
C14	0.029 (2)	0.023 (2)	0.0351 (18)	−0.0041 (18)	−0.0024 (16)	0.0036 (15)
C15	0.026 (2)	0.025 (2)	0.0412 (18)	0.0032 (19)	−0.0073 (16)	0.0014 (16)
C16	0.027 (2)	0.023 (2)	0.0396 (18)	0.0026 (18)	0.0009 (16)	−0.0014 (15)
C17	0.033 (2)	0.023 (2)	0.0394 (19)	0.0002 (19)	−0.0063 (17)	0.0014 (16)
C18	0.028 (2)	0.016 (2)	0.0364 (18)	−0.0043 (17)	−0.0019 (15)	−0.0008 (14)
C19	0.024 (2)	0.027 (2)	0.045 (2)	0.0016 (19)	−0.0066 (17)	0.0003 (16)
C20	0.030 (2)	0.027 (2)	0.0421 (19)	−0.0035 (19)	0.0040 (17)	−0.0049 (16)
C21	0.036 (2)	0.027 (2)	0.0339 (18)	−0.0058 (19)	−0.0020 (16)	0.0015 (16)
C22	0.029 (2)	0.027 (2)	0.0405 (18)	0.0014 (19)	−0.0068 (16)	0.0019 (17)
C23	0.029 (2)	0.028 (2)	0.0375 (18)	0.0003 (18)	−0.0007 (15)	−0.0031 (16)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

Fe1—C2A	2.011 (11)	C5A—H5A	1.0000
Fe1—C4	2.011 (5)	C6—C10	1.433 (5)
Fe1—C1A	2.012 (16)	C6—C7	1.434 (5)
Fe1—C5	2.020 (6)	C6—C11	1.476 (5)
Fe1—C7	2.041 (4)	C7—C8	1.432 (5)
Fe1—C10	2.041 (4)	C7—H7	1.0000
Fe1—C3	2.044 (5)	C8—C9	1.409 (6)
Fe1—C9	2.045 (4)	C8—H8	1.0000
Fe1—C6	2.048 (4)	C9—C10	1.431 (5)
Fe1—C8	2.051 (4)	C9—H9	1.0000
Fe1—C1	2.058 (6)	C10—H10	1.0000
Fe1—C3A	2.065 (11)	C11—C16	1.394 (5)
Cl1—C21	1.744 (4)	C11—C12	1.394 (5)
N1—C17	1.272 (5)	C12—C13	1.391 (5)
N1—C14	1.424 (4)	C12—H12	0.9500
C1—C5	1.4200	C13—C14	1.393 (5)
C1—C2	1.4200	C13—H13	0.9500
C1—H1	1.0000	C14—C15	1.390 (5)
C2—C3	1.4200	C15—C16	1.385 (5)
C2—H2	1.0000	C15—H15	0.9500
C3—C4	1.4200	C16—H16	0.9500
C3—H3	1.0000	C17—C18	1.467 (5)
C4—C5	1.4200	C17—H17	0.9500
C4—H4	1.0000	C18—C19	1.395 (5)
C5—H5	1.0000	C18—C23	1.396 (5)
C1A—C2A	1.4200	C19—C20	1.393 (5)
C1A—C5A	1.4200	C19—H19	0.9500
C1A—H1A	1.0000	C20—C21	1.374 (5)
C2A—C3A	1.4200	C20—H20	0.9500
C2A—H2A	1.0000	C21—C22	1.387 (5)
C3A—C4A	1.4200	C22—C23	1.386 (5)
C3A—H3A	1.0000	C22—H22	0.9500
C4A—C5A	1.4200	C23—H23	0.9500
C4A—H4A	1.0000

C2A—Fe1—C1A	41.3 (2)	C1A—C2A—Fe1	69.4 (6)
C4—Fe1—C5	41.25 (11)	C3A—C2A—Fe1	71.7 (5)
C2A—Fe1—C7	173.8 (4)	C1A—C2A—H2A	126.0
C4—Fe1—C7	120.3 (2)	C3A—C2A—H2A	126.0
C1A—Fe1—C7	139.3 (4)	Fe1—C2A—H2A	126.0
C5—Fe1—C7	108.08 (19)	C4A—C3A—C2A	108.0
C2A—Fe1—C10	113.8 (3)	C4A—C3A—Fe1	71.3 (5)
C4—Fe1—C10	123.4 (2)	C2A—C3A—Fe1	67.6 (5)
C1A—Fe1—C10	142.7 (4)	C4A—C3A—H3A	126.0
C5—Fe1—C10	161.7 (2)	C2A—C3A—H3A	126.0
C7—Fe1—C10	68.99 (16)	Fe1—C3A—H3A	126.0
C4—Fe1—C3	40.99 (9)	C5A—C4A—C3A	108.0
C5—Fe1—C3	68.85 (13)	C5A—C4A—Fe1	68.9 (6)
C7—Fe1—C3	155.1 (2)	C3A—C4A—Fe1	68.8 (5)
C10—Fe1—C3	105.79 (16)	C5A—C4A—H4A	126.0
C2A—Fe1—C9	117.2 (3)	C3A—C4A—H4A	126.0
C4—Fe1—C9	161.1 (2)	Fe1—C4A—H4A	126.0
C1A—Fe1—C9	115.8 (3)	C4A—C5A—C1A	108.0
C5—Fe1—C9	156.3 (2)	C4A—C5A—Fe1	71.3 (5)
C7—Fe1—C9	68.63 (16)	C1A—C5A—Fe1	67.6 (5)
C10—Fe1—C9	41.01 (14)	C4A—C5A—H5A	126.0
C3—Fe1—C9	124.3 (2)	C1A—C5A—H5A	126.0
C2A—Fe1—C6	137.5 (4)	Fe1—C5A—H5A	126.0
C4—Fe1—C6	106.01 (16)	C10—C6—C7	107.4 (3)
C1A—Fe1—C6	175.3 (4)	C10—C6—C11	126.2 (3)
C5—Fe1—C6	124.97 (19)	C7—C6—C11	126.4 (3)
C7—Fe1—C6	41.08 (14)	C10—C6—Fe1	69.2 (2)
C10—Fe1—C6	41.03 (14)	C7—C6—Fe1	69.2 (2)
C3—Fe1—C6	119.10 (17)	C11—C6—Fe1	125.3 (3)
C9—Fe1—C6	68.92 (15)	C8—C7—C6	107.9 (3)
C2A—Fe1—C8	144.8 (4)	C8—C7—Fe1	69.9 (2)
C4—Fe1—C8	156.7 (2)	C6—C7—Fe1	69.7 (2)
C1A—Fe1—C8	114.5 (4)	C8—C7—H7	126.0
C5—Fe1—C8	121.9 (2)	C6—C7—H7	126.0
C7—Fe1—C8	40.99 (14)	Fe1—C7—H7	126.0
C10—Fe1—C8	68.56 (16)	C9—C8—C7	108.3 (3)
C3—Fe1—C8	161.6 (2)	C9—C8—Fe1	69.7 (2)
C9—Fe1—C8	40.25 (16)	C7—C8—Fe1	69.1 (2)
C6—Fe1—C8	68.88 (14)	C9—C8—H8	125.8
C4—Fe1—C1	68.74 (15)	C7—C8—H8	125.8
C5—Fe1—C1	40.74 (12)	Fe1—C8—H8	125.8
C7—Fe1—C1	126.60 (19)	C8—C9—C10	108.4 (3)
C10—Fe1—C1	155.2 (2)	C8—C9—Fe1	70.1 (2)
C3—Fe1—C1	68.13 (11)	C10—C9—Fe1	69.3 (2)
C9—Fe1—C1	121.19 (19)	C8—C9—H9	125.8
C6—Fe1—C1	163.2 (2)	C10—C9—H9	125.8
C8—Fe1—C1	109.23 (18)	Fe1—C9—H9	125.8
C2A—Fe1—C3A	40.75 (18)	C9—C10—C6	107.9 (3)
C1A—Fe1—C3A	68.6 (3)	C9—C10—Fe1	69.7 (2)
C7—Fe1—C3A	133.3 (4)	C6—C10—Fe1	69.7 (2)
C10—Fe1—C3A	112.4 (3)	C9—C10—H10	126.0
C9—Fe1—C3A	144.0 (4)	C6—C10—H10	126.0
C6—Fe1—C3A	107.8 (3)	Fe1—C10—H10	126.0
C8—Fe1—C3A	174.1 (4)	C16—C11—C12	118.1 (3)
C17—N1—C14	120.4 (3)	C16—C11—C6	121.7 (3)
C5—C1—C2	108.0	C12—C11—C6	120.2 (3)
C5—C1—Fe1	68.20 (19)	C13—C12—C11	121.2 (4)
C2—C1—Fe1	70.44 (19)	C13—C12—H12	119.4
C5—C1—H1	126.0	C11—C12—H12	119.4
C2—C1—H1	126.0	C12—C13—C14	120.4 (4)
Fe1—C1—H1	126.0	C12—C13—H13	119.8
C1—C2—C3	108.0	C14—C13—H13	119.8
C1—C2—Fe1	69.3 (2)	C15—C14—C13	118.3 (3)
C3—C2—Fe1	68.7 (2)	C15—C14—N1	116.6 (3)
C1—C2—H2	126.0	C13—C14—N1	125.1 (3)
C3—C2—H2	126.0	C16—C15—C14	121.3 (4)
Fe1—C2—H2	126.0	C16—C15—H15	119.3
C4—C3—C2	108.0	C14—C15—H15	119.3
C4—C3—Fe1	68.3 (2)	C15—C16—C11	120.7 (4)
C2—C3—Fe1	70.9 (2)	C15—C16—H16	119.7
C4—C3—H3	126.0	C11—C16—H16	119.7
C2—C3—H3	126.0	N1—C17—C18	121.6 (4)
Fe1—C3—H3	126.0	N1—C17—H17	119.2
C3—C4—C5	108.0	C18—C17—H17	119.2
C3—C4—Fe1	70.74 (19)	C19—C18—C23	118.6 (3)
C5—C4—Fe1	69.7 (2)	C19—C18—C17	120.2 (3)
C3—C4—H4	126.0	C23—C18—C17	121.3 (3)
C5—C4—H4	126.0	C20—C19—C18	121.1 (4)
Fe1—C4—H4	126.0	C20—C19—H19	119.5
C1—C5—C4	108.0	C18—C19—H19	119.5
C1—C5—Fe1	71.1 (2)	C21—C20—C19	118.8 (4)
C4—C5—Fe1	69.0 (2)	C21—C20—H20	120.6
C1—C5—H5	126.0	C19—C20—H20	120.6
C4—C5—H5	126.0	C20—C21—C22	121.8 (3)
Fe1—C5—H5	126.0	C20—C21—Cl1	119.2 (3)
C2A—C1A—C5A	108.0	C22—C21—Cl1	119.0 (3)
C2A—C1A—Fe1	69.3 (5)	C23—C22—C21	119.0 (4)
C5A—C1A—Fe1	71.7 (4)	C23—C22—H22	120.5
C2A—C1A—H1A	126.0	C21—C22—H22	120.5
C5A—C1A—H1A	126.0	C22—C23—C18	120.9 (4)
Fe1—C1A—H1A	126.0	C22—C23—H23	119.6
C1A—C2A—C3A	108.0	C18—C23—H23	119.6

C5—C1—C2—C3	0.0	C7—C8—C9—Fe1	58.5 (3)
Fe1—C1—C2—C3	58.00 (19)	C8—C9—C10—C6	−0.1 (4)
C5—C1—C2—Fe1	−58.00 (19)	Fe1—C9—C10—C6	−59.5 (3)
C1—C2—C3—C4	0.0	C8—C9—C10—Fe1	59.4 (3)
Fe1—C2—C3—C4	58.4 (2)	C7—C6—C10—C9	0.6 (4)
C1—C2—C3—Fe1	−58.4 (2)	C11—C6—C10—C9	178.6 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C5	0.0	Fe1—C6—C10—C9	59.4 (3)
Fe1—C3—C4—C5	60.0 (2)	C7—C6—C10—Fe1	−58.8 (3)
C2—C3—C4—Fe1	−60.0 (2)	C11—C6—C10—Fe1	119.2 (4)
C2—C1—C5—C4	0.0	C10—C6—C11—C16	163.4 (4)
Fe1—C1—C5—C4	−59.4 (2)	C7—C6—C11—C16	−18.9 (6)
C2—C1—C5—Fe1	59.4 (2)	Fe1—C6—C11—C16	−107.8 (4)
C3—C4—C5—C1	0.0	C10—C6—C11—C12	−15.5 (6)
Fe1—C4—C5—C1	60.66 (17)	C7—C6—C11—C12	162.2 (4)
C3—C4—C5—Fe1	−60.66 (17)	Fe1—C6—C11—C12	73.3 (5)
C5A—C1A—C2A—C3A	0.0	C16—C11—C12—C13	−1.8 (6)
Fe1—C1A—C2A—C3A	61.6 (4)	C6—C11—C12—C13	177.1 (4)
C5A—C1A—C2A—Fe1	−61.6 (4)	C11—C12—C13—C14	0.7 (6)
C1A—C2A—C3A—C4A	0.0	C12—C13—C14—C15	1.7 (6)
Fe1—C2A—C3A—C4A	60.1 (5)	C12—C13—C14—N1	179.8 (4)
C1A—C2A—C3A—Fe1	−60.1 (5)	C17—N1—C14—C15	−162.1 (4)
C2A—C3A—C4A—C5A	0.0	C17—N1—C14—C13	19.8 (6)
Fe1—C3A—C4A—C5A	57.8 (6)	C13—C14—C15—C16	−3.1 (6)
C2A—C3A—C4A—Fe1	−57.8 (6)	N1—C14—C15—C16	178.7 (3)
C3A—C4A—C5A—C1A	0.0	C14—C15—C16—C11	2.0 (6)
Fe1—C4A—C5A—C1A	57.7 (4)	C12—C11—C16—C15	0.5 (6)
C3A—C4A—C5A—Fe1	−57.7 (4)	C6—C11—C16—C15	−178.4 (4)
C2A—C1A—C5A—C4A	0.0	C14—N1—C17—C18	−178.4 (3)
Fe1—C1A—C5A—C4A	−60.1 (5)	N1—C17—C18—C19	168.2 (4)
C2A—C1A—C5A—Fe1	60.1 (5)	N1—C17—C18—C23	−12.3 (6)
C10—C6—C7—C8	−0.8 (4)	C23—C18—C19—C20	−0.5 (6)
C11—C6—C7—C8	−178.9 (4)	C17—C18—C19—C20	179.0 (4)
Fe1—C6—C7—C8	−59.7 (3)	C18—C19—C20—C21	−0.8 (6)
C10—C6—C7—Fe1	58.9 (3)	C19—C20—C21—C22	1.8 (6)
C11—C6—C7—Fe1	−119.2 (4)	C19—C20—C21—Cl1	−176.9 (3)
C6—C7—C8—C9	0.8 (4)	C20—C21—C22—C23	−1.4 (6)
Fe1—C7—C8—C9	−58.8 (3)	Cl1—C21—C22—C23	177.3 (3)
C6—C7—C8—Fe1	59.6 (3)	C21—C22—C23—C18	0.0 (6)
C7—C8—C9—C10	−0.4 (4)	C19—C18—C23—C22	0.9 (6)
Fe1—C8—C9—C10	−58.9 (3)	C17—C18—C23—C22	−178.7 (4)

Funding information

JTM thanks Tulane University for support of the Tulane Crystallography Laboratory. TH is grateful to Hacettepe University Scientific Research Project Unit (grant No. 013 D04 602 004).

References

Adil, S., Khan, A. U., Badshah, H., Asghar, F., Usman, M., Badshah, A. & Ali, S. (2018). Drug Dev. Res. 79, 184–197. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2012). DIAMOND, Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Bruker (2020). APEX3 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Bugarinović, J. P., Pešić, M. S., Minić, A., Katanić, J., Ilić-Komatina, D., Pejović, A., Mihailović, V., Stevanović, D., Nastasijević, B. & Damljanović, I. (2018). J. Inorg. Biochem. 189, 134–142. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Chohan, Z. H., Jaffery, M. F. & Supuran, C. T. (2001). Met.-Based Drugs, 8, 95–101. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Chohan, Z. H. & Praveen, M. (2000). Appl. Organomet. Chem. 14, 376–382. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Damljanović, I., Vukićević, M., Radulović, N., Palić, R., Ellmerer, E., Ratković, Z., Joksović, M. D. & Vukićević, R. D. (2009). Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19, 1093–1096. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Fery-Forgues, S. & Delavaux-Nicot, B. (2000). J. Photochem. Photobiol. 132, 137–159. CAS Google Scholar
García-Barrantes, P. M., Lamoureux, G. V., Pérez, A. L., García-Sánchez, R. N., Martínez, A. R. & San Feliciano, A. (2013). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 70, 548–557. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Gibson, V. C., Long, N. J., Oxford, P. J., White, A. J. & Williams, D. J. (2006). Organometallics, 25, 1932–1939. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Hathwar, V. R., Sist, M., Jørgensen, M. R. V., Mamakhel, A. H., Wang, X., Hoffmann, C. M., Sugimoto, K., Overgaard, J. & Iversen, B. B. (2015). IUCrJ, 2, 563–574. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hirshfeld, H. L. (1977). Theor. Chim. Acta, 44, 129–138. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Ismail, M. K., Khan, Z., Rana, M., Horswell, S. L., Male, L., Nguyen, H. V., Perotti, A., Romero–Canelón, I., Wilkinson, E. A., Hodges, N. J. & Tucker, J. H. R. (2020). ChemBioChem, 21, 2487–2494. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jakku, R., Eda, R. R., Mirzadeh, N., Telukutla, S. R., Vardhaman, A. K., Lingamallu, G., Balasubramanian, S., Deep, P., Sistla, R., Bhargava, S. & Trivedi, R. (2020). Polyhedron, 192, 114829. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Jo, S. J., Jin, Y. E., Kim, J. H. & Suh, H. S. (2007). Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 28, 2015–2019. CAS Google Scholar
Li, Y. F. & Liu, Z. Q. (2011). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 44, 158–163. CAS Google Scholar
McKinnon, J. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2007). Chem. Commun. 3814–3816. Google Scholar
Naz, M., Ali, J., Fatima, S., Tabassum, S., Nawaz, S., Badshah, A. & Dou, H. (2020). Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 597, 124760. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Ong, Y. C. & Gasser, G. (2020). Drug Discov. Today: Technol. pp. 1740–6749. Google Scholar
Onofrei, R. M., Carlescu, I., Lisa, G., Silion, M., Hurduc, N. & Scutaru, D. (2012). Rev. Chim. 63, 139–145. CAS Google Scholar
Peter, S. & Aderibigbe, B. A. (2019). Molecules, 24, 3604. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Rauf, M. K., Shaheen, U., Asghar, F., Badshah, A., Nadhman, A., Azam, S., Ali, M. I., Shahnaz, G. & Yasinzai, M. (2016). Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 349, 50–62. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Santos, M. M., Bastos, P., Catela, I., Zalewska, K. & Branco, L. C. (2017). Med. Chem. 17, 771–784. CAS Google Scholar
Seshadri, T., Haupt, H. J., Flörke, U. & Henkel, G. (2007). Liq. Cryst. 34, 33–47. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Shabbir, M., Akhter, Z., Ahmad, I., Ahmed, S., Bolte, M., Ismail, H. & Mirza, B. (2017). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 463, 102–111. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2009). TWINABS., University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Singh, A., Lumb, I., Mehra, V. & Kumar, V. (2019). Dalton Trans. 48, 2840–2860. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tice, N. C., Parkin, S. & Selegue, J. P. (2007). J. Organomet. Chem. 692, 791–800. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Toro, P., Suazo, C., Acuña, A., Fuentealba, M., Artigas, V., Arancibia, R., Olea-Azar, C., Moncada, M., Wilkinson, S. & Klahn, A. H. (2018). J. Organomet. Chem. 862, 13–21. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Spackman, P. R., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2017). CrystalExplorer17. The University of Western Australia. Google Scholar
Venkatesan, P., Thamotharan, S., Ilangovan, A., Liang, H. & Sundius, T. (2016). Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 153, 625–636. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, R., Chen, H., Yan, W., Zheng, M., Zhang, T. & Zhang, Y. (2020). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 190, 112109. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Xiao, J., Sun, Z., Kong, F. & Gao, F. (2020). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 185, 11791. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Xue, W. M., Kühn, F. E., Herdtweck, E. & Li, Q. (2001). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 213–221. CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Yu, W., Jia, J., Gao, J., Han, L. & Li, Y. (2015). Chem. Phys. Lett. 624, 47–52. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.