Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of 6,6′-((1E,1′E)-{[1,4-phenyl­enebis(methyl­ene)]bis(aza­nylyl­idene)}bis­(methane­ylyl­idene))bis­(2-meth­oxy­phenol)

Kansiz, S.; Yesilbag, S.; Dege, N.; Saif, E.; Agar, E.

doi:10.1107/S2056989021013347

research communications

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 78| Part 1| January 2022| Pages 84-87

https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989021013347

Open

access

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of 6,6′-((1E,1′E)-{[1,4-phenylenebis(methylene)]bis(azanylylidene)}bis(methaneylylidene))bis(2-methoxyphenol)

Sevgi Kansiz,^a ^* Semanur Yesilbag,^b Necmi Dege,^c Eiad Saif ^d,^e ^* and Erbil Agar ^f

^aSamsun University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Fundamental Sciences, 55420, Samsun, Turkey, ^bDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University, 55139, Samsun, Turkey, ^cOndokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Physics, 55139, Samsun, Turkey, ^dDepartment of Computer and Electronic Engineering Technology, Sanaa Community, College, Sanaa, Yemen, ^eOndokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 55139, Samsun, Turkey, and ^fOndokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Chemistry, 55139, Samsun, Turkey
^*Correspondence e-mail: sevgi.kansiz@samsun.edu.tr, eiad.saif@scc.edu.ye

Edited by V. Jancik, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México (Received 1 November 2021; accepted 15 December 2021; online 1 January 2022)

The Schiff base compound, C₂₄H₂₄N₂O₄, was synthesized by the interaction of 2-hydroxy-3-methoxy benzaldehyde and 1,4-benzene dimethanamine in ethanol, and crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n with Z′ = 0.5. The molecule is not planar, the 1,4-diethylbenzene and the phenol rings are twisted with respect to each other, making a dihedral angle of 74.27 (5)°. The molecular structure is stabilized by an O—H⋯N hydrogen bond, forming an S(6) ring motif. In the crystal, molecules are linked by C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, resulting in the formation of sheets parallel to the bc plane. A Hirshfeld surface analysis was undertaken to investigate the various intermolecular contacts controlling the supramolecular topology, suggesting the H⋯O (18%) contacts to be the most significant interactions, whereas the H⋯H (50.5%) and C⋯H (24.3%) interactions are less significant.

Keywords: crystal structure; tetradentate salen-type; Schiff base; phenol–imine tautomer; Hirshfeld surface analysis.

CCDC reference: 2128953

1. Chemical context

Schiff bases are used as pigments and dyes, catalysts, intermediates in organic synthesis, and as polymer stabilizers (Supuran et al., 1996 ). In azomethine derivatives, the C=N linkage is essential for biological activity and several azomethines have been reported to possess remarkable antibacterial, antifungal, anticancer and diuretic activities (Gaur, 2003 ). Schiff bases having an azomethine group of general formula C=N– contain various substituted groups (Schiff, 1864 ). Of particular interest are the two different tautomeric structures for o-hydroxy Schiff bases, which are expressed as keto-amine and phenol-imine, with intrinsic N—H⋯O or O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds, (Filarowski et al., 2004 ). There are many studies in the literature on the synthesis of Schiff bases and investigation of tautomeric structures. Phenol-imine and keto-amine tautomeric structures exhibit features of photochromism and thermochromism (Hadjoudis et al., 2004 ). Tetradentate salen-type ligands have been used in almost all areas of coordination chemistry to prepare complexes that have catalytic and biological activity or which feature interesting structural, electrochemical or magnetic properties (Abd El-Hamid et al., 2019 ). In this study, a symmetrical tetradentate Schiff base ligand bearing ONNO donor atoms, 6,6′-((1E,1′E)-{[1,4-phenylenebis(methylene)]bis(azanylylidene)}bis(methaneylylidene))bis(2-methoxyphenol) was synthesized by the interaction of 2-hydroxy-3-methoxy benzaldehyde and 1,4-benzene dimethanamine in ethanol and its crystal structure determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.

2. Structural commentary

The molecular structure of the title Schiff base derivative is illustrated in Fig. 1. The asymmetric unit of the title compound contains one-half of the centrosymmetric molecule (Z′ = 0.5). There is an intramolecular O2—H2⋯N1 hydrogen bond (Table 1 and Fig. 1); this is a common feature also observed in related phenol-imine Schiff bases. It forms an S(6) ring motif and also induces the phenol ring and the Schiff base to be nearly coplanar, as indicated by the C6—C8—N1—C9 torsion angle of 178.54 (13)°. The molecule is non-planar, the 1,4-diethylbenzene ring being inclined to the phenol ring by 74.27 (5)°. The C7—C6—C8—N1 torsion angle [3.8 (2)°] further supports the co-planarity of the phenol ring and the Schiff base. The C7—O2 distance is 1.3438 (17) Å, which is close to normal values reported for single C—O bonds in phenols and salicylideneamines (Kaştaş & Albayrak Kaştaş, 2019 ). The N1—C8 bond is short at 1.2717 (17) Å, strongly indicating a C=N double bond, while the long C6—C8 bond [1.451 (2) Å] implies a single bond. All of these data support the existence of the phenol–imine tautomer for the title compound in the crystalline state.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯N1	0.86 (1)	1.79 (2)	2.5877 (18)	154 (2)
C8—H8⋯O2ⁱ	0.93	2.51	3.410 (2)	162
Symmetry code: (i) $[x+{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{1\over 2}}, z+{\script{1\over 2}}]$ .

Figure 1
The molecular structure of the title compound with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 40% probability level. Symmetry code: (i) −x + 2, −y + 1, −z + 1.

3. Supramolecular features

In the crystal, molecules are connected into sheets extending in the bc plane by C8—H8⋯O2ⁱ hydrogen bonds (Table 1; Fig. 2).

Figure 2
A view of the crystal packing of the title compound in a view parallel to the bc plane. C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed blue lines.

4. Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD Version 5.42, update of May 2021; Groom et al., 2016 ) for the (1,4-phenylene)bis(N-ethylidenemethanamine) moiety revealed some related structures. The most similar structures are 1,4-bis(2-pyridylmethyleneaminomethyl)benzene (GOLJUN; Li et al., 2009 ), 1,4-bis(3-pyridylmethyleneaminomethyl)benzene (GOLJOH; He et al., 2009 ) and 1,4-bis(3,5-di-t-butyl-2-hydroxybenzylideneaminomethyl)benzene (OCAPAK; Tooke et al., 2004 ). In GOLJUN and GOLJOH, the molecules have similar shapes to the title compound. The C—N bond lengths [1.253 (2) Å in GOLJOH and 1.256 (2) Å in GOLJUN] are typical for an azomethine C=N bond and shorter than in the title compound [1.2717 (19) Å]. The torsion angles involving the C—C=N—C units are −177.26 (11)° and 115.21 (13)° in GOLJUN. These values are similar to those observed in the title compound. In OCAPAK, a t-butyl group is present, different from the title compound. In addition, there is an intramolecular O—H⋯N contact in the title compound. Similarly, in OCAPAK, the hydroxyl H atom is involved in an intramolecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bond, forming an S(6) ring motif as in the title compound. The length of intramolecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bond in OCAPAK is especially short [1.65 (2) Å] compared to that in the title compound [1.789 (15) Å].

5. Hirshfeld surface analysis

Hirshfeld surface analysis was used to analyse the various intermolecular interactions in the title compound, through mapping of the normalized contact distance (d_norm) using CrystalExplorer17 (Turner et al., 2017 ; Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009 ). Hirshfeld surface analysis is a valuable tool for assessing the strength of intermolecular interactions, predicting the properties of a crystal and its potential applications (Al-Resayes et al., 2020 ). The Hirshfeld surface was generated using a standard (high) surface resolution with the three-dimensional d_norm surface mapped over a fixed color scale of −0.175 (red) to 1.404 a.u. (blue). The packing of molecules is mainly dependent on H⋯H (50.5%) and C⋯H (24.3%) interactions and the significant C—H⋯O interactions (18%). Blue regions in the d_norm map indicate intermolecular interactions with distances longer than van der Waals radius sum of the interacting elements (Fig. 3). The C—H⋯O interactions, which appear as red spots in the d_norm map, have contact distances shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii of the oxygen and hydrogen atoms

Figure 3
The Hirshfeld surface analysis of the title compound mapped with d_norm over −0.175 to 1.404 a.u. showing the C—H⋯O hydrogen-bonded contacts.

6. Synthesis and crystallization

0.0225 g (0.148 mmol) of 2-hydroxy-3-methoxy benzaldehyde was dissolved in 20 mL of ethanol and mixed with 0.0100 g (0.074 mmol) of 1,4-benzene dimethanamine dissolved in 20 mL of ethanol (Fig. 4). The reaction mixture was refluxed for 6 h and at the end of the reaction, the solution was allowed to cool. The yellow product obtained was washed with ether and crystallized in ethanol at room temperature (m.p. = 431–434 K, yield 85%).

Figure 4
The synthesis of the title compound.

7. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. The O–bound H atom was located in a difference-Fourier map and refined with with U_iso(H) = 1.5U_eq(O) and a distance restraint. The C-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically (C—H = 0.93, 0.96 and 0.97 Å) and refined using a riding model, with U_iso(H) = 1.5U_eq(C) for methyl H atoms and 1.2U_eq(C) for other H atoms.

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	C₂₄H₂₄N₂O₄
M_r	404.45
Crystal system, space group	Monoclinic, P2₁/n
Temperature (K)	296
a, b, c (Å)	4.7339 (10), 18.406 (4), 11.880 (2)
β (°)	98.47 (3)
V (Å³)	1023.8 (4)
Z	2
Radiation type	Mo Kα
μ (mm⁻¹)	0.09
Crystal size (mm)	0.61 × 0.45 × 0.23

Data collection
Diffractometer	Stoe IPDS 2
Absorption correction	Integration (X-RED32; Stoe & Cie, 2002 )
T_min, T_max	0.963, 0.992
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	6766, 1863, 1315
R_int	0.034
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.600

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.037, 0.092, 1.01
No. of reflections	1863
No. of parameters	140
No. of restraints	1
H-atom treatment	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.11, −0.09
Computer programs: X-AREA and X-RED (Stoe & Cie, 2002), SHELXT2014/5 (Sheldrick, 2015a ), SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015b ) and PLATON (Spek, 2020 ).

Supporting information

CCDC reference: 2128953

Crystal structure: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989021013347/jq2011sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989021013347/jq2011Isup2.hkl

Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989021013347/jq2011Isup3.cml

checkCIF report

Computing details top

Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2002); cell refinement: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2002); data reduction: X-RED (Stoe & Cie, 2002); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT2014/5 (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2020).

6,6'-((1E,1'E)-{[1,4-Phenylenebis(methylene)]bis(azanylylidene)}bis(methaneylylidene))bis(2-methoxyphenol) top

Crystal data top

C₂₄H₂₄N₂O₄	F(000) = 428
M_r = 404.45	D_x = 1.312 Mg m⁻³
Monoclinic, P2₁/n	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 4.7339 (10) Å	Cell parameters from 7423 reflections
b = 18.406 (4) Å	θ = 1.7–31.5°
c = 11.880 (2) Å	µ = 0.09 mm⁻¹
β = 98.47 (3)°	T = 296 K
V = 1023.8 (4) Å³	Plate, yellow
Z = 2	0.61 × 0.45 × 0.23 mm

Data collection top

Stoe IPDS 2 diffractometer	1863 independent reflections
Radiation source: sealed X-ray tube, 12 x 0.4 mm long-fine focus	1315 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 6.67 pixels mm^-1	R_int = 0.034
rotation method scans	θ_max = 25.3°, θ_min = 2.1°
Absorption correction: integration (X-RED32; Stoe & Cie, 2002)	h = −5→5
T_min = 0.963, T_max = 0.992	k = −22→22
6766 measured reflections	l = −13→14

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full	Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.037	Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F²) = 0.092	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.01	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.049P)²] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
1863 reflections	(Δ/σ)_max < 0.001
140 parameters	Δρ_max = 0.11 e Å⁻³
1 restraint	Δρ_min = −0.09 e Å⁻³

Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
O2	0.6966 (3)	0.21666 (6)	0.38262 (9)	0.0633 (3)
H2	0.817 (4)	0.2501 (10)	0.4060 (16)	0.095*
O1	0.3093 (3)	0.11352 (6)	0.35977 (10)	0.0722 (4)
N1	1.0411 (3)	0.30049 (6)	0.51303 (11)	0.0550 (3)
C7	0.6181 (3)	0.18967 (7)	0.47846 (12)	0.0499 (4)
C6	0.7362 (3)	0.21470 (8)	0.58611 (12)	0.0528 (4)
C10	1.1273 (3)	0.43140 (8)	0.51623 (13)	0.0533 (4)
C8	0.9571 (3)	0.26998 (8)	0.59825 (13)	0.0561 (4)
H8	1.040345	0.283593	0.671014	0.067*
C2	0.4103 (3)	0.13480 (8)	0.46848 (13)	0.0560 (4)
C12	1.1668 (4)	0.47353 (9)	0.42431 (14)	0.0620 (4)
H12	1.279589	0.456251	0.372334	0.074*
C9	1.2603 (4)	0.35690 (8)	0.53440 (15)	0.0629 (4)
H9A	1.400552	0.350226	0.483419	0.075*
H9B	1.357488	0.352833	0.611939	0.075*
C11	0.9593 (4)	0.45861 (9)	0.59194 (14)	0.0634 (4)
H11	0.930241	0.431002	0.654796	0.076*
C5	0.6416 (4)	0.18568 (10)	0.68255 (14)	0.0697 (5)
H5	0.719087	0.202247	0.754451	0.084*
C3	0.3230 (4)	0.10710 (9)	0.56514 (17)	0.0702 (5)
H3	0.186333	0.070445	0.558980	0.084*
C4	0.4365 (4)	0.13326 (11)	0.67187 (16)	0.0786 (5)
H4	0.372061	0.114863	0.736433	0.094*
C1	0.0961 (4)	0.05885 (10)	0.34579 (18)	0.0816 (6)
H1A	0.044148	0.048311	0.266297	0.122*
H1B	−0.068976	0.075560	0.376457	0.122*
H1C	0.168648	0.015654	0.385164	0.122*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
O2	0.0715 (8)	0.0674 (7)	0.0513 (6)	−0.0180 (6)	0.0096 (5)	0.0000 (5)
O1	0.0729 (8)	0.0703 (7)	0.0742 (8)	−0.0230 (6)	0.0139 (6)	−0.0124 (6)
N1	0.0550 (8)	0.0453 (7)	0.0626 (8)	0.0025 (6)	0.0021 (6)	−0.0016 (6)
C7	0.0525 (8)	0.0459 (7)	0.0519 (8)	0.0048 (7)	0.0102 (7)	0.0047 (6)
C6	0.0519 (9)	0.0532 (8)	0.0523 (8)	0.0089 (7)	0.0044 (7)	0.0069 (6)
C10	0.0448 (9)	0.0483 (8)	0.0641 (9)	−0.0039 (6)	−0.0012 (7)	−0.0083 (7)
C8	0.0562 (9)	0.0560 (9)	0.0532 (9)	0.0104 (7)	−0.0019 (7)	−0.0021 (7)
C2	0.0540 (9)	0.0503 (8)	0.0644 (10)	0.0024 (7)	0.0110 (8)	0.0020 (7)
C12	0.0607 (10)	0.0598 (9)	0.0670 (10)	0.0024 (8)	0.0146 (8)	−0.0071 (8)
C9	0.0535 (9)	0.0523 (9)	0.0805 (11)	0.0008 (7)	0.0022 (8)	−0.0051 (8)
C11	0.0675 (11)	0.0570 (9)	0.0665 (10)	0.0020 (8)	0.0128 (9)	0.0029 (7)
C5	0.0690 (11)	0.0868 (12)	0.0527 (9)	0.0083 (10)	0.0066 (8)	0.0126 (8)
C3	0.0629 (11)	0.0631 (10)	0.0865 (13)	−0.0018 (8)	0.0170 (10)	0.0180 (9)
C4	0.0742 (12)	0.0940 (14)	0.0699 (12)	0.0043 (11)	0.0188 (10)	0.0333 (10)
C1	0.0695 (12)	0.0710 (12)	0.1064 (15)	−0.0183 (9)	0.0202 (11)	−0.0169 (10)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

O2—C7	1.3438 (17)	C2—C3	1.375 (2)
O2—H2	0.858 (13)	C12—C11ⁱ	1.386 (2)
O1—C2	1.3668 (19)	C12—H12	0.9300
O1—C1	1.418 (2)	C9—H9A	0.9700
N1—C8	1.2717 (19)	C9—H9B	0.9700
N1—C9	1.463 (2)	C11—H11	0.9300
C7—C6	1.396 (2)	C5—C4	1.361 (3)
C7—C2	1.403 (2)	C5—H5	0.9300
C6—C5	1.396 (2)	C3—C4	1.388 (3)
C6—C8	1.451 (2)	C3—H3	0.9300
C10—C12	1.374 (2)	C4—H4	0.9300
C10—C11	1.379 (2)	C1—H1A	0.9600
C10—C9	1.511 (2)	C1—H1B	0.9600
C8—H8	0.9300	C1—H1C	0.9600

C7—O2—H2	104.1 (13)	C10—C9—H9A	109.6
C2—O1—C1	117.26 (13)	N1—C9—H9B	109.6
C8—N1—C9	118.17 (14)	C10—C9—H9B	109.6
O2—C7—C6	122.05 (13)	H9A—C9—H9B	108.1
O2—C7—C2	118.20 (14)	C10—C11—C12ⁱ	120.95 (15)
C6—C7—C2	119.75 (13)	C10—C11—H11	119.5
C7—C6—C5	119.45 (15)	C12ⁱ—C11—H11	119.5
C7—C6—C8	120.53 (13)	C4—C5—C6	120.35 (17)
C5—C6—C8	120.02 (15)	C4—C5—H5	119.8
C12—C10—C11	118.18 (14)	C6—C5—H5	119.8
C12—C10—C9	121.52 (14)	C2—C3—C4	120.71 (17)
C11—C10—C9	120.30 (15)	C2—C3—H3	119.6
N1—C8—C6	122.40 (14)	C4—C3—H3	119.6
N1—C8—H8	118.8	C5—C4—C3	120.38 (16)
C6—C8—H8	118.8	C5—C4—H4	119.8
O1—C2—C3	125.21 (15)	C3—C4—H4	119.8
O1—C2—C7	115.45 (13)	O1—C1—H1A	109.5
C3—C2—C7	119.34 (16)	O1—C1—H1B	109.5
C10—C12—C11ⁱ	120.88 (14)	H1A—C1—H1B	109.5
C10—C12—H12	119.6	O1—C1—H1C	109.5
C11ⁱ—C12—H12	119.6	H1A—C1—H1C	109.5
N1—C9—C10	110.42 (13)	H1B—C1—H1C	109.5
N1—C9—H9A	109.6

O2—C7—C6—C5	178.60 (14)	C11—C10—C12—C11ⁱ	−0.1 (3)
C2—C7—C6—C5	−1.3 (2)	C9—C10—C12—C11ⁱ	179.25 (15)
O2—C7—C6—C8	−1.9 (2)	C8—N1—C9—C10	−102.38 (16)
C2—C7—C6—C8	178.27 (13)	C12—C10—C9—N1	−108.69 (17)
C9—N1—C8—C6	178.54 (13)	C11—C10—C9—N1	70.69 (19)
C7—C6—C8—N1	3.8 (2)	C12—C10—C11—C12ⁱ	0.1 (3)
C5—C6—C8—N1	−176.65 (14)	C9—C10—C11—C12ⁱ	−179.26 (15)
C1—O1—C2—C3	0.4 (2)	C7—C6—C5—C4	0.2 (2)
C1—O1—C2—C7	−179.17 (14)	C8—C6—C5—C4	−179.33 (15)
O2—C7—C2—O1	0.7 (2)	O1—C2—C3—C4	−179.08 (16)
C6—C7—C2—O1	−179.47 (13)	C7—C2—C3—C4	0.5 (2)
O2—C7—C2—C3	−178.96 (14)	C6—C5—C4—C3	1.2 (3)
C6—C7—C2—C3	0.9 (2)	C2—C3—C4—C5	−1.6 (3)

Symmetry code: (i) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
O2—H2···N1	0.86 (1)	1.79 (2)	2.5877 (18)	154 (2)
C8—H8···O2ⁱⁱ	0.93	2.51	3.410 (2)	162

Symmetry code: (ii) x+1/2, −y+1/2, z+1/2.

Acknowledgements

Author contributions are as follows. Conceptualization, SK, EA and ES; synthesis, SY and EA; writing (review and editing of the manuscript) SK and SY; formal analysis, SY, EA, ND and SK; crystal-structure determination, SY, SK and ND; validation, SY, EA and ES; project administration, EA, SY and SK.

Funding information

Funding for this research was provided by Samsun University under Project No. BAP·MÜF.5501.2020.004.

References

Abd El-Hamid, S. M., Sadeek, S. A. & Abd El-Latif, N. S. (2019). Appl. Organomet. Chem. 33, e5010–e5023. Google Scholar
Al-Resayes, S. I., Azam, M., Trzesowska-Kruszynska, A., Kruszynski, R., Soliman, S. M., Mohapatra, R. K. & Khan, Z. (2020). ACS Omega, 5, 27227–27234. CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Filarowski, A., Koll, A., Karpfen, A. & Wolschann, P. (2004). Chem. Phys. 297, 323–332. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Gaur, S. (2003). Asian J. Chem. 15, 250–254. CAS Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hadjoudis, E. A., Rontoyianni, A., Ambroziak, K., Dziembowska, T. & Mavridis, I. M. (2004). J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 162–521. Google Scholar
He, M.-Y., Li, C., Xu, H., Hu, Z.-J. & Chen, Q. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o285. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kaştaş, G. & Albayrak Kaştaş, Ç. (2019). J. Mol. Struct. 1184, 427–434. Google Scholar
Li, C., Sun, F.-A., He, M.-Y., Xu, H. & Chen, Q. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, o286. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Schiff, H. (1864). Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 131, 118–119. CrossRef Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spackman, M. A. & Jayatilaka, D. (2009). CrystEngComm, 11, 19–32. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Spek, A. L. (2020). Acta Cryst. E76, 1–11. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Stoe & Cie (2002). X-AREA and X-RED32. Stoe & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany. Google Scholar
Supuran, C., Barboiu, M., Luca, C., Pop, E., Brewster, M. & Dinculescu, A. (1996). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 31, 597–606. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Tooke, D. M., Song, Y., Albada, G. A. van, Reedijk, J. & Spek, A. L. (2004). Acta Cryst. E60, o1907–o1908. CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Turner, M. J., MacKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Spackman, P. R., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2017). CrystalExplorer17.5. University of Western Australia. https://hirshfeldsurface.net. Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.