research communications
of 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid from powder diffraction data
aDepartment of Chemistry, North Central College, 131 S. Loomis, St., Naperville IL, 60540 , USA
*Correspondence e-mail: kaduk@polycrystallography.com
The 8H6O6, was solved and refined using laboratory X-ray powder diffraction data, and optimized using density functional techniques. The published structure of 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid dihydrate was also optimized. The carboxylic acid groups form strong hydrogen bonds, which form centrosymmetric rings with graph set R22(8). These hydrogen bonds link the molecules into chains along [011]. There is an intramolecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bond between the hydroxyl group and the carbonyl group of the carboxylic acid. The hydrogen bonding in the dihydrate is very different. Although the intramolecular hydroxy/carboxylic acid hydrogen bond is present, the water molecule acts as an acceptor to the carboxylic acid and a donor to two other oxygen atoms. The carboxylic acid groups do not interact with each other directly.
of anhydrous 2,5-dhydroxyterephthalic acid, C1. Chemical context
2,5-Dihydroxyterephthalate (C8H4O62–; dhtp) is of current interest as a linker in metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). It can add extra functionality to alter adsorption and catalytic properties. In an attempt to replicate the ionothermal preparation of the Co-dhtp MOF Co2(dobdc)-ST (Azbell et al., 2022), an unexpected product was obtained, namely anhydrous 2,5-dhydroxyterephthalic acid, C8H6O6, (I).
The crystal structures of three Co-dhtp MOFs have been reported: Cambridge Structural Database refcodes FEGBEB (Gen, 2017), VOFJIM (Rosnes et al., 2019) and VOFJIM01 (Ayoub et al., 2019). The calculated powder patterns of these three compounds, which have been given the name CPO-27-Co, indicate that they have the same structure (Fig. 1).
2. Structural commentary
Compound (I) crystallizes in the triclinic P with half a molecule in the The root-mean-square Cartesian displacements of the non-H atoms in the Rietveld-refined and CRYSTAL17-optimized structures is 0.053 Å (Fig. 2). The good agreement provides strong evidence that the structure is correct (van de Streek & Neumann, 2014). The CRYSTAL17 and VASP-optimized structures are essentially identical (r.m.s. displacement = 0.031 Å). This discussion concentrates on the CRYSTAL17-optimized structure. The full molecule (with atom numbering) is illustrated in Fig. 3 and a view of the packing down the a-axis direction is shown in Fig. 4.
All of the bond distances, angles, and torsion angles fall within the normal ranges indicated by a Mercury Mogul geometry check (Macrae et al., 2020). The plane of the phenyl ring lies approximately on the (98) Miller plane. The peak profiles are dominated by anisotropic microstrain broadening: the average microstrain is 8362 ppm.
The Bravais–Friedel–Donnay–Harker (Bravais, 1866; Friedel, 1907; Donnay & Harker, 1937) morphology suggests that we might expect platy (with {001} as the major faces) morphology for this crystal. A 4th order spherical harmonics model was included in the The refined texture index was 1.059 (2), indicating that was small for this capillary specimen. In flat plate specimens examined in Bragg–Brentano geometry using Cu radiation, the tended to be higher.
3. Supramolecular features
In the extended structure of (I), the carboxylic acid groups form strong O3—H4⋯O5 hydrogen bonds, which form centrosymmetric loops with graph set R22(8) (Etter, 1990; Bernstein et al., 1995; Shields et al., 2000). These hydrogen bonds link the molecules into chains propagating along [011] (Table 1; Fig. 5). There is an intramolecular O1—H2⋯O5 hydrogen bond between the hydroxyl group and the carbonyl group of the carboxyl acid. A C—H⋯O hydrogen bond also contributes to the lattice energy. The Mercury aromatics analyser indicates one strong interaction with a centroid–centroid distance of 4.26 Å, and a moderate one at 5.59 Å.
|
The hydrogen bonding in the dihydrate DUSJUX (Cheng et al., 2010) is very different (Table 2; Fig. 6). Although the intramolecular hydroxy–carboxylic acid O—H⋯O hydrogen bond is present, the water molecule acts as an acceptor to the carboxylic acid and a donor to two other oxygen atoms. The carboxylic acid groups do not interact with each other directly.
|
The CRYSTAL17 (Dovesi et al., 2018) calculations suggest that DUSJUX is 28.5 kcal mol−1 lower in energy than the sum of anhdyrous 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid and two water molecules. The corresponding VASP (Kresse & Furthmüller, 1996) calculations indicate that DUSJUX is 114.0 kcal mol−1 more stable. As chemists, we would like to attribute the `extra' energy to the formation of additional hydrogen bonds. Rammohan & Kaduk (2018) developed (for citrates using earlier versions of CRYSTAL) a correlation between the energy of an O—H⋯O hydrogen bond and the Mulliken overlap population between the H and the O acceptor: E (kcal mol−1) = 54.7(overlap)1/2. Using this correlation to estimate the energies of the individual hydrogen bonds, we calculate that DUSJUX is 59.6 kcal mol−1 lower in energy than the sum of the anhydrous molecule and two water molecules – a value between the two DFT calculations. While the disagreements indicate that the absolute energy calculated for a hydrogen bond may be more uncertain than we would like, the Mulliken overlap population is certainly a guide to whether a hydrogen bond is stronger or weaker than another, and to whether a (geometrically possible) hydrogen bond is real or not.
4. Database survey
A connectivity search in the Cambridge Structural Database [CSD version 5.43 June 2022 (Groom et al., 2016); ConQuest 2022.2.0 (Bruno et al., 2002)] of a 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalate fragment with the elements C, H, and O only yielded the structure of the dihydrate (Cheng et al., 2010; DUSJUX), as well as two The dihydrate was also obtained accidentally during the synthesis of metal–organic coordination polymers. Removing the chemistry limitation yielded 249 entries, many of which are metal–organic frameworks. A search of the powder pattern against the Powder Diffraction File (Gates-Rector & Blanton, 2019) yielded no hits. Not even the usual accidental matches were obtained; this pattern evidently occupies a very different portion of `diffraction space'.
5. Synthesis and crystallization
Cobalt(II) chloride hexahydrate (1.78 g, 7.50 mmol) and 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid (1.00 g, 5.05 mmol) were crushed together with mortar and pestle and added to a 10 ml round-bottom flask. The flask was connected to a Schlenk line and placed in a glass bowl of sand on top of a hot plate. The hot plate was heated to 443 K for approximately 18 h and the round-bottom flask was under vacuum. After being removed from the heat and allowed to cool, the remaining solid was transferred to a Pyrex container with acetonitrile (50 ml) and placed in a vacuum oven at 343 K for 24 h. After removal from the oven, the solution was decanted and replaced with acetonitrile (50 ml). This wash procedure was done a total of three times. The remaining solid was then added to 100 ml of methanol at 343 K for 24 h and decanted, this wash was done two times. The remaining solid was then added to a vacuum oven at 423 K for 24 h. The remaining solid was then added to a scintillation vial wrapped with Parafilm for storage.
6. Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure . A portion of the sample was blended with 11.51% < 1 micron diamond powder (Alfa Aesar) internal standard in a mortar and pestle until the color was uniform. The X-ray powder diffraction pattern was measured from a 0.7 mm diameter static capillary specimen on a PANalytical Empyrean diffractometer using Mo Kα radiation. The pattern was measured from 1.0–50.0° 2θ in 0.0083560° steps, counting for 4 sec/step.
details are summarized in Table 3After correcting the peak positions using the known diamond peak positions, the pattern was indexed using JADE Pro (MDI, 2022) on a primitive triclinic cell with a = 4.26420, b = 5.58601, c = 8.17902 Å, α = 93.53, β = 12.13, γ = 96.78° and V = 188 Å3. Since the volume corresponded to one molecule of 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid, the was assumed to be P, with half a molecule in the A search of the CSD yielded no hits. Preliminary indexing attempts using the default peak list from a pattern collected using Cu radiation were unsuccessful (monoclinic cells with no reasonable structures), until closer examination of the pattern revealed that the peak at 21.6° (9.7° Mo) was actually a doublet, and that there was an additional peak at 22.0° (9.9° Mo). Including these two additional peaks yielded the triclinic cell.
The 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid molecule was extracted from the DUSJUX structure using Materials Studio (Dassault Systèmes, 2021), and saved as a .mol2 file. The was solved using Monte Carlo simulated annealing techniques as implemented in EXPO2014 (Altomare et al., 2013), using a whole molecule as the fragment. Since the molecule occupies a center of symmetry, the two halves overlapped partially. The overlapping atoms were averaged manually using Materials Studio to obtain the asymmetric unit.
Rietveld GSAS-II (Toby & Von Dreele, 2013). All non-H bond distances and angles were subjected to restraints, based on a Mercury Mogul geometry check (Sykes et al., 2011; Bruno et al., 2004). A planar restraint was applied to the benzene ring. The Mogul average and standard deviation for each quantity were used as the restraint parameters. The restraints contributed 1.9% to the final χ2. The hydrogen atoms were included in calculated positions, which were recalculated during the using Materials Studio (Dassault Systèmes, 2021). The Uiso of the heavy atoms were grouped by chemical similarity. The Uiso for the H atoms were fixed at 1.3× the Uiso of the heavy atoms to which they are attached. The peak profiles were described using the generalized microstrain model. The background was modeled using a four-term shifted Chebyshev polynomial, along with a peak at 12.05° to model the scattering from the glass capillary and any amorphous component. The final refinements yielded the residuals reported in Table 1. The largest errors in the difference plot (Fig. 7) are small, and are in the shapes of the peaks.
was carried out usingThe VASP (Kresse & Furthmüller, 1996) (fixed experimental unit cells) through the MedeA graphical interface (Materials Design, 2016). The calculations were carried out on 16 2.4 GHz processors (each with 4 Gb RAM) of a 64-processor HP Proliant DL580 Generation 7 Linux cluster at North Central College. The calculations used the GGA-PBE functional, a plane wave cutoff energy of 400.0 eV, and a k-point spacing of 0.5 Å−1 leading to a 4 × 3 × 2 mesh. The structures were also optimized (fixed experimental cells) and population analyses were carried out using CRYSTAL17 (Dovesi et al., 2018). The basis sets for the H, C, N, and O atoms in the calculations were those of Gatti et al. (1994). The calculations were run on a 3.5 GHz PC using 8 k-points and the B3LYP functional.
(as well as that of DUSJUX and an isolated water molecule) was optimized usingSupporting information
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989022009409/hb8038sup1.cif
contains datablocks global, I_DFT, DUSJUX_DFT, vege083_overall, I, Ia, vege083_pwd_0. DOI:Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989022009409/hb8038Isup2.cml
C8H6O6 | β = 102.219 (4)° |
Mr = 198.08 | γ = 96.7621 (14)° |
Triclinic, P1 | V = 191.69 (1) Å3 |
Hall symbol: -P 1 | Z = 1 |
a = 4.2947 (5) Å | Dx = 1.716 Mg m−3 |
b = 5.6089 (5) Å | T = 302 K |
c = 8.2331 (19) Å | cylinder, 12 × 0.7 mm |
α = 93.612 (4)° |
PANalytical Empyrean diffractometer | Data collection mode: transmission |
Specimen mounting: glass capillary | Scan method: step |
18 restraints | Preferred orientation correction: Simple spherical harmonic correction Order = 4 Coefficients: 0:0:C(2,-2) = 0.246(11); 0:0:C(2,-1) = -0.018(11); 0:0:C(2,0) = -0.313(16); 0:0:C(2,1) = 0.217(13); 0:0:C(2,2) = -0.192(9); 0:0:C(4,-4) = -0.146(17); 0:0:C(4,-3) = 0.073(19); 0:0:C(4,-2) = -0.052(16); 0:0:C(4,-1) = 0.083(18); 0:0:C(4,0) = -0.058(17); 0:0:C(4,1) = -0.006(18); 0:0:C(4,2) = -0.196(23); 0:0:C(4,3) = 0.071(16); 0:0:C(4,4) = 0.108(25) |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
C10 | 0.492 (2) | 0.6406 (16) | 0.6392 (11) | 0.0323 (10)* | |
C6 | 0.6818 (18) | 0.4506 (18) | 0.6571 (9) | 0.0323 (10)* | |
C7 | 0.6946 (18) | 0.3106 (14) | 0.5107 (12) | 0.0323 (10)* | |
C9 | 0.477 (2) | 0.7892 (16) | 0.7918 (9) | 0.0553 (15)* | |
O1 | 0.8599 (12) | 0.4082 (9) | 0.8120 (6) | 0.0323 (10)* | |
O3 | 0.2791 (12) | 0.9640 (12) | 0.7718 (7) | 0.0553 (15)* | |
O5 | 0.6452 (16) | 0.7744 (11) | 0.9376 (9) | 0.0553 (15)* | |
H8 | 0.84185 | 0.17135 | 0.52928 | 0.0420 (14)* | |
H2 | 0.83782 | 0.54288 | 0.88998 | 0.0420 (14)* | |
H4 | 0.30280 | 1.07255 | 0.87663 | 0.0719 (19)* |
C10—C6 | 1.411 (5) | C9—O3 | 1.365 (5) |
C10—C7i | 1.384 (5) | C9—O5 | 1.277 (5) |
C10—C9 | 1.482 (6) | O1—C6 | 1.391 (5) |
C6—C10 | 1.411 (5) | O1—H2 | 0.987 (5) |
C6—C7 | 1.412 (6) | O3—C9 | 1.365 (5) |
C6—O1 | 1.391 (5) | O3—H4 | 1.004 (6) |
C7—C10i | 1.384 (5) | O5—C9 | 1.277 (5) |
C7—C6 | 1.412 (6) | H8—C7 | 1.060 (8) |
C7—H8 | 1.060 (8) | H2—O1 | 0.987 (5) |
C9—C10 | 1.482 (6) | H4—O3 | 1.004 (6) |
C6—C10—C7i | 124.3 (7) | C10i—C7—H8 | 126.7 (10) |
C6—C10—C9 | 118.1 (9) | C6—C7—H8 | 115.1 (10) |
C7i—C10—C9 | 117.5 (9) | C10—C9—O3 | 116.8 (7) |
C10—C6—C7 | 117.4 (6) | C10—C9—O5 | 125.0 (9) |
C10—C6—O1 | 121.6 (9) | O3—C9—O5 | 118.1 (7) |
C7—C6—O1 | 121.0 (10) | C6—O1—H2 | 105.5 (6) |
C10i—C7—C6 | 118.1 (7) | C9—O3—H4 | 112.7 (5) |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1. |
C | V = 46.12 (1) Å3 |
Mr = 12.01 | Z = 8 |
Cubic, Fd3m | Dx = 3.459 Mg m−3 |
Hall symbol: -F 4vw 2vw | T = 302 K |
a = 3.58625 (11) Å |
Preferred orientation correction: March-Dollase correction coef. = 1.000 axis = [0, 0, 1] |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
C1 | 0.12500 | 0.12500 | 0.12500 | 0.0159* |
C1—C1i | 1.5529 | C1—C1iii | 1.5529 |
C1—C1ii | 1.5529 | C1—C1iv | 1.5529 |
C1i—C1—C1ii | 109.471 | C1i—C1—C1iv | 109.471 |
C1i—C1—C1iii | 109.471 | C1ii—C1—C1iv | 109.471 |
C1ii—C1—C1iii | 109.471 | C1iii—C1—C1iv | 109.471 |
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1/4, y+1/4, −z; (ii) −z, x+1/4, y+1/4; (iii) y+1/4, −z, x+1/4; (iv) −x, −y, −z. |
C8H6O6 | c = 8.1976 Å |
Mr = 198.08 | α = 93.6590° |
Triclinic, P1 | β = 102.1730° |
a = 4.2647 Å | γ = 96.7840° |
b = 5.5912 Å | Z = 1 |
x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
C10 | 0.50725 | 0.65165 | 0.64068 | 0.06414* | |
C6 | 0.68695 | 0.46350 | 0.65571 | 0.06414* | |
C7 | 0.69097 | 0.31393 | 0.51546 | 0.06414* | |
C9 | 0.48403 | 0.80691 | 0.79069 | 0.01062* | |
O1 | 0.87656 | 0.42423 | 0.80458 | 0.01062* | |
O3 | 0.28942 | 0.97462 | 0.76830 | 0.01062* | |
O5 | 0.65017 | 0.78063 | 0.93109 | 0.01062* | |
H8 | 0.84185 | 0.17135 | 0.52928 | 0.08339* | |
H2 | 0.83782 | 0.54288 | 0.88999 | 0.01381* | |
H4 | 0.30280 | 1.07255 | 0.87663 | 0.01381* |
C10—C6 | 1.370 | C7—H8 | 1.079 |
C10—C7i | 1.415 | C9—O3 | 1.320 |
C10—C9 | 1.487 | C9—O5 | 1.245 |
C6—C7 | 1.382 | O1—H2 | 0.986 |
C6—O1 | 1.361 | O3—H4 | 1.000 |
C7—C10i | 1.415 | H4—O3 | 1.000 |
Symmetry code: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1. |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O3—H4···O5ii | 1.00 | 1.69 | 2.689 | 174 |
O1—H2···O5 | 0.99 | 1.68 | 2.567 | 147 |
Symmetry code: (ii) −x+1, −y+2, −z+2. |
C8H6O6·2(H2O) | c = 5.49900 Å |
Monoclinic, P21/c | β = 103.03° |
a = 5.18830 Å | V = 487.68 Å3 |
b = 17.54500 Å | Z = 2 |
x | y | z | Biso*/Beq | ||
O1 | 0.02829 | 0.35100 | 0.84164 | ||
H1 | −0.08229 | 0.31915 | 0.93268 | ||
O2 | 0.41842 | 0.59430 | 0.63866 | ||
H2 | 0.51266 | 0.64044 | 0.56603 | ||
O3 | 0.28123 | 0.68492 | 0.87357 | ||
C1 | 0.01145 | 0.42401 | 0.92007 | ||
C2 | 0.14692 | 0.48106 | 0.82449 | ||
H3 | 0.26253 | 0.46707 | 0.68792 | ||
C3 | 0.28585 | 0.61663 | 0.80175 | ||
C4 | 0.13841 | 0.55682 | 0.90233 | ||
O4 | 0.64658 | 0.70011 | 0.46632 | ||
H4 | 0.52537 | 0.74263 | 0.39890 | ||
H5 | 0.75145 | 0.68680 | 0.34282 |
D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
O2—H2···O4 | 1.07 | 1.43 | 2.500 | 178 |
O1—H1···O3i | 1.01 | 1.64 | 2.562 | 149 |
O4—H4···O3ii | 0.99 | 1.78 | 2.736 | 161 |
O4—H5···O1iii | 0.99 | 1.82 | 2.794 | 169 |
Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+1, −z+2; (ii) x, −y+3/2, z−1/2; (iii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1. |
Acknowledgements
We thank Professors Nicholas C. Boaz, Paul F. Brandt and Jeffrey A. Bjorklund for guidance and helpful discusssions.
References
Altomare, A., Cuocci, C., Giacovazzo, C., Moliterni, A., Rizzi, R., Corriero, N. & Falcicchio, A. (2013). J. Appl. Cryst. 46, 1231–1235. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Ayoub, G., Karadeniz, B., Howarth, A. J., Farha, O. K., Đilović, I., Germann, L. S., Dinnebier, R. E., Užarević, K. & Friščić, T. (2019). Chem. Mater. 31, 5494–5501. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Azbell, T., Pitt, T., Bollmeyer, M., Cong, C., Lancaster, K. & Milner, P. (2022). ChemRxiv, https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-00xd7. Google Scholar
Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N. L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Bravais, A. (1866). Etudes Cristallographiques. Paris: Gauthier Villars. Google Scholar
Bruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Edgington, P. R., Kessler, M., Macrae, C. F., McCabe, P., Pearson, J. & Taylor, R. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 389–397. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Bruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Kessler, M., Luo, J., Motherwell, W. D. S., Purkis, L. H., Smith, B. R., Taylor, R., Cooper, R. I., Harris, S. E. & Orpen, A. G. (2004). J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44, 2133–2144. Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Cheng, P.-W., Cheng, C.-F., Chun-Ting, Y. & Lin, C.-H. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o1928. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Crystal Impact (2022). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. https://www.crystalimpact.de/diamond Google Scholar
Dassault Systèmes (2021). Materials Studio. BIOVIA, San Diego, USA. Google Scholar
Donnay, J. D. H. & Harker, D. (1937). Am. Mineral. 22, 446–447. CAS Google Scholar
Dovesi, R., Erba, A., Orlando, R., Zicovich–Wilson, C. M., Civalleri, B., Maschio, L., Rérat, M., Casassa, S., Baima, J., Salustro, J. & Kirtman, B. (2018). WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 8, e1360. Google Scholar
Etter, M. C. (1990). Acc. Chem. Res. 23, 120–126. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Friedel, G. (1907). Bull. Soc. Fr. Mineral. 30, 326–455. Google Scholar
Gates-Rector, S. & Blanton, T. (2019). Powder Diffr. 34, 352–360. CAS Google Scholar
Gatti, C., Saunders, V. R. & Roetti, C. (1994). J. Chem. Phys. 101, 10686–10696. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Gen, Z. L. (2017). Private communication (refcode FEGBEB). CCDC, Cambridge, England. https://doi.org/10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc1pfslh Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. (1996). Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Macrae, C. F., Sovago, I., Cottrell, S. J., Galek, P. T. A., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Platings, M., Shields, G. P., Stevens, J. S., Towler, M. & Wood, P. A. (2020). J. Appl. Cryst. 53, 226–235. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Materials Design (2016). MedeA. Materials Design Inc., Angel Fire, NM, USA. Google Scholar
MDI (2022). JADE Pro. Materials Data, Livermore, CA, USA. Google Scholar
Rammohan, A. & Kaduk, J. A. (2018). Acta Cryst. B74, 239–252. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Rosnes, M. H., Mathieson, J. S., Törnroos, K. W., Johnsen, R. E., Cronin, L. & Dietzel, P. D. C. (2019). Cryst. Growth Des. 19, 2089–2096. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Shields, G. P., Raithby, P. R., Allen, F. H. & Motherwell, W. D. S. (2000). Acta Cryst. B56, 455–465. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Streek, J. van de & Neumann, M. A. (2014). Acta Cryst. B70, 1020–1032. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sykes, R. A., McCabe, P., Allen, F. H., Battle, G. M., Bruno, I. J. & Wood, P. A. (2011). J. Appl. Cryst. 44, 882–886. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Toby, B. H. & Von Dreele, R. B. (2013). J. Appl. Cryst. 46, 544–549. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.