tools for teaching crystallography\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Crystal structure of the insecticide ethiprole (C13H9Cl2F3N4OS): a case study of whole-mol­ecule configurational disorder

crossmark logo

aDepartment of Studies in Chemistry, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysuru-570 006, India, bHoneychem Pharma Research Pvt. Ltd., Peenya Industrial Area, Bengaluru-560 058, India, and cDepartment of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506-0055, USA
*Correspondence e-mail: ybb2706@gmail.com, yathirajan@hotmail.com, s.parkin@uky.edu

Edited by G. Diaz de Delgado, Universidad de Los Andes Mérida, Venezuela (Received 20 December 2022; accepted 13 January 2023; online 19 January 2023)

The crystal structure of ethiprole {systematic name: 5-amino-1-[2,6-di­chloro-4-(tri­fluoro­meth­yl)phen­yl]-4-ethane­sulfinyl-1H-imidazole-3-carbo­nitrile}, C13H9Cl2F3N4OS, a phenyl­pyrazole-based insecticide, is presented. The pyrazole ring carries four substituents: an N-bound 2,6-di­chloro-4-tri­fluoro­methyl­phenyl ring and C-bound amine, ethane­sulfinyl, and cyano groups. The sulfur atom of the ethane­sulfinyl group is trigonal–pyramidal and stereogenic. The structure exhibits whole-mol­ecule configurational disorder due to superposition of enanti­omers. The crystal packing is dominated by strong N—H⋯O and N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds, which form R44(18) and R22(12) ring motifs. Since the ethiprole mol­ecule is quite small, and structure solution and refinement were straightforward, the structure presents a convenient instructional example for modelling whole-body disorder of a non-rigid mol­ecule. To this end, a step-by-step overview of the model-building and refinement process is also given. The structure could form the basis of a useful classroom, practical, or workshop-style example.

1. Chemical context

Ethiprole, systematic name 5-amino-1-[2,6-di­chloro-4-(tri­fluoro­meth­yl)phen­yl]-4-(ethane­sulfin­yl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carb­o­­nitrile (C13H9Cl2F3N4OS), is a phenyl­pyrazole-based insecticide. This class of compounds target an insect's central nervous system, making it toxic to the host by blocking the glutamate-gated chloride channel. They are effective against a broad spectrum of chewing and sucking insects, showing pronounced plant systemic activity (Wu, 1998[Wu, T.-T. (1998). US Patent 5,814,652.]), as well as offering protection against stored-grain insect pests (Arthur, 2002[Arthur, F. H. (2002). J. Econ. Entomol. 95, 1314-1318.]). Fipronil and fipronil sulfone are related insecticides. The design, synthesis, and mode of action of phenyl­pyrazoles containing the 2,2,2-tri­chloro-1-alk­oxy­ethyl functionality has been published by Zhao et al. (2010[Zhao, Q., Li, Y., Xiong, L. & Wang, Q. (2010). J. Agric. Food Chem. 58, 4992-4998.]). The synthesis and pharmacological activities of pyrazole derivatives were reviewed by Karrouchi et al. (2018[Karrouchi, K., Radi, S., Ramli, Y., Taoufik, J., Mabkhot, Y. N., Al-Aizari, F. A. & Ansar, M. (2018). Molecules, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23010134]), and advances in their synthesis were described by Fustero et al. (2011[Fustero, S., Sánchez-Roselló, M., Barrio, P. & Simón-Fuentes, A. (2011). Chem. Rev. 111, 6984-7034.]). Further developments in the synthesis and biological evaluations of pyrazole derivatives were reviewed recently by Ebenezer et al. (2022[Ebenezer, O., Shapi, M. & Tuszynski, J. A. (2022). Biomedicines 10, 1124.]). In light of the general structure–function relationships of phenyl­pyrazole insecticides, it is surprising that the crystal structure of ethiprole has not previously been published. One possible reason could be the presence of whole-mol­ecule disorder (vide infra), which provided further impetus for our crystallographic study of ethiprole.

[Scheme 1]

Ethiprole is a chiral mol­ecule by virtue of the trigonal–pyramidal geometry at the sulfur atom of its ethane­sulfinyl group. Commercial formulations are, however, racemic. The crystal structure presented here is centrosymmetric, but was found to incorporate configurational whole-mol­ecule disorder. The phenomenon of whole-mol­ecule disorder is not new; well-known examples include azulene (Robertson et al., 1962[Robertson, J. M., Shearer, H. M. M., Sim, G. A. & Watson, D. G. (1962). Acta Cryst. 15, 1-8.]) and uric acid dihydrate (Parkin & Hope, 1998[Parkin, S. & Hope, H. (1998). Acta Cryst. B54, 339-344.]), amongst many others. Unlike ethiprole, both azulene and uric acid are rigid planar mol­ecules. In azulene, disorder results from the mol­ecule (which lacks inversion point symmetry) being situated on a crystallographic inversion centre (and is therefore disordered exactly 50:50), while in uric acid dihydrate the minor disorder component results from a non-crystallographic 180° flip of the mol­ecule, which fortuitously happens to remain compatible with the hydrogen-bonding environment of its major-occupancy counterpart. In ethiprole, however, the mol­ecule is not rigid; indeed it has several inter­nal degrees of freedom. The disorder results from superposition of enanti­omers, with concomitant torsional relaxation of the other functional groups to satisfy hydrogen-bonding requirements and best fill the available space. Since the ethiprole mol­ecule is quite small, and structure solution and refinement were relatively straightforward, we thought it might serve as a conven­ient instructional example to showcase the concept and treatment of whole-mol­ecule disorder for a non-rigid mol­ecule. To this end, we also present a step-by-step overview of one way to proceed from structure solution through model building and refinement to a chemically and crystallographically sensible final model.

2. Structural commentary

The ethiprole mol­ecule (Fig. 1[link]) consists of a phenyl­pyrazole backbone with Cl atoms at the 2- and 6-positions of the benzene ring and a CF3 group at the 4-position. The pyrazole ring connects to benzene by one of its ring nitro­gen atoms, with dihedral angle 80.4 (2)° for the major component [minor is 79.7 (12)°] and carries an NH2 group on the carbon adjacent to the ring-linking nitro­gen. The ethane­sulfinyl substituent is attached to the middle carbon of the pyrazole ring, with a cyano group on the remaining carbon. All bond lengths and angles in ethiprole have normal values, but there is slight deviation of substituents away from the plane of the benzene ring, i.e., C13 by 0.174 (9) Å, N1 by 0.162 (8) Å on one side of the ring and Cl1 by 0.096 (7) Å and Cl2 by 0.078 (12) Å on the other side. The sulfur atom of the ethane­sulfinyl group is trigonal–pyramidal and therefore stereogenic, but since the structure is centrosymmetric, the crystals are, of necessity, racemic. Despite the equal presence of both optical isomers, each asymmetric unit contains disorder components [major and minor fractions are 86.70 (18)% and 13.30 (18)%, respectively] of the opposite hand (i.e., R or S at the sulfur superimposed on S or R, respectively), as shown in Fig. 2[link]. In addition to the dihedral angle mentioned above, inter­nal degrees of freedom in the mol­ecule correspond to torsions about the N1—C7, C10—C13, and C2—S1 bonds, which are summarized for both disorder components in Table 1[link]. A detailed step-by-step breakdown of one way to build a satisfactory model for the whole-mol­ecule configurational disorder is given in Section 6: Structure solution and step-by-step refinement overview.

3. Supra­molecular features

Given the relatively small occupancy fraction of the minor disorder component (only ∼13%), detailed description of supra­molecular inter­actions given here is limited to the major component. The proximity of superimposed disorder components (Fig. 2[link]), however, suggests that the hydrogen-bonding motifs are compatible with both major–minor and minor–minor inter­actions. There are only two strong inter­molecular hydrogen bonds for the major component (Table 2[link]), and both involve the two hydrogens of the amine group at N3 as donor. These are N3—H3NA⋯O1i [DD⋯A = 2.820 (6) Å] to an inversion-related mol­ecule and N3—H3NB⋯N4ii [DD⋯A = 3.150 (4) Å] involving a mol­ecule adjacent along the a-axis direction (symmetry codes are as per Table 2[link]). In combination with further inversion-related mol­ecules, these hydrogen bonds generate R44(18) and R22(12) ring motifs (Fig. 3[link]), which link together to form tapes parallel to the a-axis. There are weaker contacts involving C—H as donor included in Table 2[link], but of these, only C9—H9⋯O1iii at 3.17 (4) Å is likely to have any structural importance.

4. Database and literature survey

There are a large number of structurally and chemically related compounds present in the CSD (CSD version 5.43 with all updates through September 2022; Groom et al., 2016[Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171-179.]). A recent paper by Priyanka et al. (2022[Priyanka, P., Jayanna, B. K., Sunil Kumar, Y. C., Shreenivas, M. T., Srinivasa, G. R., Divakara, T. R., Yathirajan, H. S. & Parkin, S. (2022). Acta Cryst. E78, 1084-1088.]) on N-{3-cyano-1-[2,6-di­chloro-4-(tri­fluoro-meth­yl)phen­yl]-4-(ethyl­sulfan­yl)-1H-pyrazol-5-yl}-2,2,2-tri­fluoro­acetamide (CSD entry FERPOL) recorded 82 matches for a 1-phenyl-cyano­pyrazole search fragment. Fine tuning of this search fragment by specifying any N-bound group at C1 reduced the number of matches to 76, while inclusion of 2,6-di­chloro-4-(tri­fluoro­meth­yl)phenyl at N1 gave 60 hits. The requirement of a sulfur-bound group at C2 reduced this to eight unique structures, two of which were dimers. A table of the six best structural matches, plus three closely related compounds was given (see Priyanka et al., 2022[Priyanka, P., Jayanna, B. K., Sunil Kumar, Y. C., Shreenivas, M. T., Srinivasa, G. R., Divakara, T. R., Yathirajan, H. S. & Parkin, S. (2022). Acta Cryst. E78, 1084-1088.] and references therein). The structure of ethiprole would fit well in that table.

The phenomenon of whole-mol­ecule disorder is not uncommon. A search of the CSD for `whole-mol­ecule disorder', however, gave only 39 hits, but we suspect the true number is higher as not all relevant entries would have been flagged as such in the CSD. A search for `configurational disorder' affecting only whole mol­ecules returned three structures (CUHDOY, CUHDUE, CUHFAM; Bouwstra et al., 1985[Bouwstra, J. A., Schouten, A., Kroon, J. & Helmholdt, R. B. (1985). Acta Cryst. C41, 420-426.]), but these involve mixed crystals of trans-stilbene and trans-azo­benzene. In those three structures the configurations are exclusively trans, so the disorder is better described as orientational because each disorder component has the same (i.e., trans) configuration. One other case is a structure purported to be a monoclinic polymorph of meso-(E,E)-1,10-[1,2-bis­(4-chloro­phen­yl)ethane-1,2-di­yl]-bis­(phenyl­diazene), CSD entry PAGCEI01 (Mohamed et al., 2016[Mohamed, S. K., Younes, S. H. H., Abdel-Raheem, E. M. M., Horton, P. N., Akkurt, M. & Glidewell, C. (2016). Acta Cryst. C72, 57-62.]), but the model as presented is severely distorted, including C—C distances as long as 1.695 (7) Å and bond angles in the range 85.9 (4)–139.9 (6)° for ostensibly sp3-hybridized carbon atoms. The improbable distortions result from inversion symmetry in the assigned space group of type C2/c (see in particular Fig. 2[link] of Mohamed et al., 2016[Mohamed, S. K., Younes, S. H. H., Abdel-Raheem, E. M. M., Horton, P. N., Akkurt, M. & Glidewell, C. (2016). Acta Cryst. C72, 57-62.]). A superposition of S,S and R,R isomers, with a smaller amount of the meso form, is more likely.

5. Synthesis and crystallization

Tri­fluoro­acetic acid (0.5 mL) was added to a stirred solution of 5-amino-1-[2,6-di­chloro-4-(tri­fluoro­meth­yl)phen­yl]-4-ethyl­thio-1H-pyrazole-3-carbo­nitrile (0.19 g, 0.5 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (2.5 mL) at 283–285 K. Hydrogen peroxide (0.1 mL of 30%, w/w) was added over 20 min. while maintaining the temperature at 283–285 K and the mixture was kept at the same temperature for a further 3 h. Then, CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was added followed by sodium hydrogen sulfite to quench any remaining hydrogen peroxide, and the mixture was maintained below 288 K for 20 min. Water (10 mL) was then added, and the mixture was subjected to a careful extraction with a portion of CH2Cl2 (50 mL). The organic phase was separated off and dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and the volatile substances were removed under reduced pressure. The residue was subjected to chromatography on a column of silica gel, eluting with petroleum ether and ethyl acetate (7:3). The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, leaving the white solid sulfoxide (Yield: 80%). A general reaction scheme is given in Fig. 4[link]. X-ray-quality crystals were obtained from methanol solution by slow evaporation (m.p.: 421–423 K).

6. Structure solution and step-by-step refinement overview

In this section, the process of model building and refinement from an initial solution through to a final model incorporating whole-mol­ecule configurational disorder is described as a series of logical steps. A few snapshots of the model at each stage are given in Fig. 5[link], with corresponding refinement statistics summarized in Table 3[link]. SHELXL RES files for each step are included in the supporting information.

Step 1: The structure solved quite easily using SHELXT, to give a starting model with all atom types assigned correctly apart from the amine nitro­gen, which had been tagged as a carbon. This starting model, depicted in Fig. 5[link]a, was readily corrected while assigning a sensible atom-numbering scheme to the model.

Step 2: Upon refinement of anisotropic displacement parameters (ADPs), the model looked quite reasonable. One fluorine ellipsoid is elongated (Fig. 5[link]b), but disorder of CF3 groups is common and easy to model. The difference map, however, revealed a few substantial electron-density peaks. In Fig. 5[link]b, the largest peak (labelled Q1) corresponded to 4.85 e Å−3, which is far too big to be ignored. The next three largest, labelled Q2, Q3, and Q4 ranged from 1.64–1.05 e Å−3. By inspection, a disorder model with a minor component for the ethane­sulfinyl substituent comprising Q1 (as S1′), O1 (copied as O1′) and Q4/Q3 (as C5′/C6′) looks plausible, but inverts the stereochemistry at the sulfur atom, thereby dictating configurational disorder. In the subsequent model, the major and minor components were assigned separate PARTs in SHELXL, occupancies were constrained to sum to unity via an FVAR (`free variable') parameter, and similarity restraints on geometry (SAME) and ADPs (SIMU) were added.

Step 3: Refinement of partial ethane­sulfinyl disorder gave the model depicted in Fig. 5[link]c. Here, the largest difference map peak (Q1) is now 1.44 e Å−3 and only about 0.8 Å from Cl1. A further problem with this partial disorder model is that the geometry of the bonding of the minor ethane­sulfinyl group to the pyrazole ring is severely distorted. In order to fix this, a second component for the pyrazole ring and consequently, much of the rest of the mol­ecule would be required. Thus, a model for whole-mol­ecule disorder was constructed by simply copying the previously non-disordered (`PART 0') atoms into the major and minor PARTs and tying the occupancies using the same FVAR parameter. The similarity (SAME and SIMU) restraints were strengthened (assigned a smaller effective uncertainty) so as to ensure that the minor-component bond distances and angles conform to those of the major.

Step 4: The resulting initial refinement of whole-mol­ecule disorder gave the model shown in Fig. 5[link]d. The previous largest difference map peak is now accounted for by the minor component Cl1′, such that the largest peaks now all correspond to hydrogen atoms.

Step 5: For the final refinement stage, hydrogen atoms were added and the constraints/restraints were optimized. For this structure, many of the disordered atom pairs are in very close proximity, so most were constrained using the SHELXL command EADP. For the minor ethane­sulfinyl group, the ADPs were restrained using RIGU (Thorn et al., 2012[Thorn, A., Dittrich, B. & Sheldrick, G. M. (2012). Acta Cryst. A68, 448-451.]). The tri­fluoro­methyl group adds an additional complication because the available electron density is not quite compatible with the occupancy factors refined for the main disorder model. For this reason, a separate occupancy for the fluorine atoms (but not the carbon) was set, which refined to 0.61 (4) for the major component. This is an approximate treatment, but wholly satisfactory in this case. Construction of a more sophisticated four-component disorder model is possible, but ultimately of limited scientific value. RIGU restraints were also sufficient to keep the minor CF3 group ADPs in check. The particular combination of constraints and restraints is largely dependent upon the nature of the disorder, and so should be decided on a case-by-case basis. Experimentation with different approaches provides a valuable learning opportunity. Overlap of disorder components in the final model is shown in Fig. 2[link]. The main take-away message here is that construction of sensible disorder models can be straightforward and logical, but the essential criterion is that the model must make good chemical and crystallographic sense. Crystal-structure refinement requires more than an uncritical quest for low R-values.

A summary of crystal data, data collection, and refinement details is given in Table 4[link]. All major-component hydrogen atoms were found in difference maps and all carbon-bound hydrogens were refined using riding models with constrained distances set to 0.95 Å (Csp2—H), 0.98 Å (RCH3), 0.99 Å (R2CH2). The major-component NH2 hydrogen coordinates refined in a stable manner, but those of the minor component used a riding model with N—H distances set to 0.88 Å. Uiso(H) parameters were assigned values of either 1.2Ueq or 1.5Ueq (RCH3 only) of the attached atom.

Table 1
Selected torsion angles (°) in ethiprole

Standard uncertainties for the minor component are much larger than for the major component as a result of its much lower occupancy factor.

Major Torsion Minor Torsion
C1—N1—C7—C8 107.1 (7) C1′—N1′—C7′—C8′ 107 (4)
C9—C10—C13—F1 73.7 (10) C9′—C10′—C13′—F1′ 105 (3)
C1—C2—S1—O1 −45.6 (4) C1′—C2′—S1′—O1′ −106 (3)

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N3—H3NA⋯O1i 0.85 (2) 1.99 (2) 2.820 (6) 164 (3)
N3—H3NB⋯N4ii 0.85 (2) 2.31 (2) 3.150 (4) 172 (3)
C9—H9⋯O1iii 0.95 2.21 3.138 (6) 165
N3′—H3ND⋯O1′i 0.88 1.94 2.81 (5) 167
N3′—H3NC⋯N4′ii 0.88 2.10 2.87 (3) 145
C9′—H9′⋯O1′iii 0.95 2.31 3.17 (4) 151
Symmetry codes: (i) [-x+1, -y+1, -z+2]; (ii) [x-1, y, z]; (iii) [x-{\script{1\over 2}}, -y+{\script{3\over 2}}, z-{\script{1\over 2}}].

Table 3
Statistics for inter­mediate and final model building and refinement stages

Steps 1–4 in the table correspond to the sequential snapshots shown in Fig. 5[link]. The result of step 5 is shown in Fig. 2[link].

Step R1 (%) wR2 (%) Δρmax (e Å−3) Δρmin (e Å−3)
1 16.49 49.05 4.73 −2.23
2 9.22 32.70 4.87 −1.16
3 6.73 25.49 1.40 −1.07
4 5.51 21.73 0.81 −0.65
5 3.65 7.65 0.37 −0.25

Table 4
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula C13H9Cl2F3N4OS
Mr 397.20
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K) 90
a, b, c (Å) 8.6199 (3), 12.7967 (5), 14.9178 (5)
β (°) 91.280 (1)
V3) 1645.12 (10)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.56
Crystal size (mm) 0.27 × 0.13 × 0.07
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker D8 Venture dual source
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015[Krause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3-10.])
Tmin, Tmax 0.856, 0.971
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 23236, 3792, 3437
Rint 0.031
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.651
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.037, 0.077, 1.26
No. of reflections 3792
No. of parameters 341
No. of restraints 108
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.37, −0.25
Computer programs: APEX3 (Bruker, 2016[Bruker (2016). APEX3. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.]), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3-8.]), SHELXL2019/2 (Sheldrick, 2015b[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3-8.]), XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]), SHELX (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010[Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.]).

Supporting information


Computing details top

Data collection: APEX3 (Bruker, 2016); cell refinement: APEX3 (Bruker, 2016); data reduction: APEX3 (Bruker, 2016); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2019/2 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELX (Sheldrick, 2008) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

5-Amino-1-[2,6-dichloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4-ethanesulfonyl-1H-imidazole-3-carbonitrile top
Crystal data top
C13H9Cl2F3N4OSF(000) = 800
Mr = 397.20Dx = 1.604 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 8.6199 (3) ÅCell parameters from 9978 reflections
b = 12.7967 (5) Åθ = 2.7–27.5°
c = 14.9178 (5) ŵ = 0.56 mm1
β = 91.280 (1)°T = 90 K
V = 1645.12 (10) Å3Tablet, colourless
Z = 40.27 × 0.13 × 0.07 mm
Data collection top
Bruker D8 Venture dual source
diffractometer
3792 independent reflections
Radiation source: microsource3437 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 7.41 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.031
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.6°, θmin = 2.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
h = 1111
Tmin = 0.856, Tmax = 0.971k = 1516
23236 measured reflectionsl = 1919
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.077 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0083P)2 + 1.5062P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.26(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
3792 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.37 e Å3
341 parametersΔρmin = 0.25 e Å3
108 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL-2019/2 (Sheldrick 2015b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0013 (3)
Special details top

Experimental. The crystal was mounted using polyisobutene oil on the tip of a fine glass fibre, which was fastened in a copper mounting pin with electrical solder. It was placed directly into the cold gas stream of a liquid-nitrogen based cryostat (Hope, 1994; Parkin & Hope, 1998).

Diffraction data were collected with the crystal at 90K, which is standard practice in this laboratory for the majority of flash-cooled crystals.

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement progress was checked using Platon (Spek, 2020) and by an R-tensor (Parkin, 2000). The final model was further checked with the IUCr utility checkCIF.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
N10.5445 (4)0.5998 (6)0.7093 (3)0.0182 (5)0.8670 (18)
N20.6936 (3)0.6209 (5)0.6832 (2)0.0196 (5)0.8670 (18)
N30.4028 (2)0.5309 (3)0.82962 (18)0.0230 (5)0.8670 (18)
H3NA0.396 (3)0.512 (2)0.8842 (14)0.028*0.8670 (18)
H3NB0.320 (3)0.552 (2)0.8046 (18)0.028*0.8670 (18)
N41.0770 (3)0.6082 (3)0.75630 (19)0.0389 (7)0.8670 (18)
C10.5370 (3)0.5576 (3)0.7931 (2)0.0171 (5)0.8670 (18)
C20.6907 (3)0.5514 (2)0.82449 (16)0.0173 (5)0.8670 (18)
C30.7781 (3)0.5921 (2)0.75424 (16)0.0174 (5)0.8670 (18)
C40.9451 (3)0.6026 (3)0.75381 (18)0.0254 (6)0.8670 (18)
S10.76917 (6)0.50533 (5)0.92572 (3)0.01963 (17)0.8670 (18)
O10.6751 (7)0.5486 (3)1.0009 (3)0.0260 (8)0.8670 (18)
C50.7180 (3)0.36919 (18)0.91758 (16)0.0272 (5)0.8670 (18)
H5A0.6040790.3611340.9210670.033*0.8670 (18)
H5B0.7510540.3408440.8592800.033*0.8670 (18)
C60.7973 (4)0.3095 (3)0.9937 (2)0.0364 (7)0.8670 (18)
H6A0.9090240.3238060.9938070.055*0.8670 (18)
H6B0.7796640.2344210.9854510.055*0.8670 (18)
H6C0.7545030.3317301.0509230.055*0.8670 (18)
C70.4240 (4)0.6102 (3)0.6436 (2)0.0168 (6)0.8670 (18)
C80.3596 (4)0.7075 (2)0.6246 (2)0.0186 (6)0.8670 (18)
Cl10.41063 (10)0.81431 (6)0.68914 (5)0.02727 (17)0.8670 (18)
C90.2533 (5)0.7197 (4)0.5541 (3)0.0234 (6)0.8670 (18)
H90.2109980.7864610.5400590.028*0.8670 (18)
C100.2102 (8)0.6321 (4)0.5045 (3)0.0228 (5)0.8670 (18)
C110.2662 (8)0.5337 (4)0.5248 (4)0.0226 (9)0.8670 (18)
H110.2330810.4745220.4910270.027*0.8670 (18)
C120.372 (1)0.5234 (4)0.5956 (5)0.0203 (6)0.8670 (18)
Cl20.4408 (3)0.4005 (3)0.6233 (3)0.0286 (4)0.8670 (18)
C130.1079 (4)0.6471 (3)0.4223 (3)0.0295 (5)0.8670 (18)
F10.1853 (13)0.6876 (12)0.3572 (8)0.056 (2)0.61 (4)
F20.0122 (15)0.7092 (14)0.4396 (10)0.066 (3)0.61 (4)
F30.0463 (14)0.5561 (8)0.3945 (8)0.0377 (15)0.61 (4)
N1'0.527 (3)0.594 (4)0.7149 (19)0.0182 (5)0.1330 (18)
N2'0.680 (2)0.610 (4)0.6972 (18)0.0196 (5)0.1330 (18)
N3'0.359 (2)0.522 (2)0.8202 (16)0.0230 (5)0.1330 (18)
H3NC0.2793540.5345040.7841210.028*0.1330 (18)
H3ND0.3451340.4918780.8724820.028*0.1330 (18)
N4'1.049 (2)0.589 (3)0.7759 (16)0.0389 (7)0.1330 (18)
C1'0.501 (2)0.548 (3)0.7958 (17)0.0171 (5)0.1330 (18)
C2'0.6496 (17)0.5301 (16)0.8317 (11)0.0173 (5)0.1330 (18)
C3'0.7518 (17)0.5701 (17)0.7724 (13)0.0174 (5)0.1330 (18)
C4'0.9195 (18)0.582 (2)0.7715 (16)0.0254 (6)0.1330 (18)
S1'0.6671 (4)0.4649 (3)0.9351 (2)0.0217 (11)0.1330 (18)
O1'0.712 (5)0.545 (3)1.006 (2)0.034 (7)0.1330 (18)
C5'0.844 (2)0.3953 (15)0.9178 (10)0.041 (4)0.1330 (18)
H5'10.8339480.3500340.8641450.049*0.1330 (18)
H5'20.9304070.4450720.9083550.049*0.1330 (18)
C6'0.878 (3)0.329 (2)1.0011 (15)0.046 (6)0.1330 (18)
H6'10.9745180.2899730.9933670.069*0.1330 (18)
H6'20.8883400.3745091.0536650.069*0.1330 (18)
H6'30.7922530.2798361.0096250.069*0.1330 (18)
C7'0.404 (3)0.6039 (18)0.6499 (16)0.0168 (6)0.1330 (18)
C8'0.334 (3)0.6994 (16)0.6320 (15)0.0186 (6)0.1330 (18)
Cl1'0.3635 (7)0.7996 (5)0.7076 (4)0.02727 (17)0.1330 (18)
C9'0.240 (3)0.715 (2)0.5570 (17)0.0234 (6)0.1330 (18)
H9'0.1929390.7809130.5454760.028*0.1330 (18)
C10'0.214 (5)0.631 (2)0.499 (2)0.0228 (5)0.1330 (18)
C11'0.277 (6)0.534 (3)0.517 (3)0.0226 (9)0.1330 (18)
H11'0.2530910.4760320.4791050.027*0.1330 (18)
C12'0.376 (7)0.522 (2)0.591 (3)0.0203 (6)0.1330 (18)
Cl2'0.461 (3)0.4036 (19)0.619 (2)0.0286 (4)0.1330 (18)
C13'0.114 (2)0.6495 (17)0.4167 (14)0.0295 (5)0.1330 (18)
F1'0.1932 (13)0.6559 (17)0.3441 (8)0.044 (3)0.39 (4)
F2'0.028 (2)0.7355 (9)0.4227 (9)0.044 (2)0.39 (4)
F3'0.012 (2)0.5720 (13)0.4029 (13)0.038 (3)0.39 (4)
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0171 (11)0.0231 (12)0.0145 (9)0.0004 (12)0.0000 (9)0.0037 (8)
N20.0165 (9)0.0266 (18)0.0159 (15)0.0032 (9)0.0013 (9)0.0046 (11)
N30.0154 (13)0.0370 (13)0.0167 (10)0.0001 (12)0.0010 (11)0.0069 (9)
N40.0218 (12)0.067 (2)0.0278 (16)0.0038 (12)0.0001 (10)0.0073 (13)
C10.0185 (14)0.0194 (14)0.0133 (9)0.0001 (14)0.0009 (11)0.0016 (8)
C20.0158 (12)0.0227 (14)0.0134 (9)0.0001 (9)0.0001 (10)0.0019 (9)
C30.0159 (11)0.0210 (15)0.0153 (13)0.0015 (9)0.0000 (9)0.0028 (9)
C40.0219 (13)0.0375 (19)0.0169 (15)0.0041 (11)0.0009 (9)0.0056 (11)
S10.0170 (3)0.0269 (3)0.0149 (2)0.0014 (2)0.00284 (18)0.0052 (2)
O10.038 (3)0.0251 (13)0.0155 (11)0.0019 (12)0.0043 (11)0.0007 (9)
C50.0363 (14)0.0218 (12)0.0234 (11)0.0061 (10)0.0017 (10)0.0010 (9)
C60.054 (2)0.0304 (15)0.0248 (14)0.0151 (16)0.0026 (14)0.0066 (11)
C70.0147 (13)0.0246 (11)0.0112 (10)0.0020 (9)0.0023 (9)0.0034 (8)
C80.0182 (15)0.0207 (11)0.0170 (11)0.0018 (9)0.0002 (9)0.0008 (9)
Cl10.0333 (4)0.0225 (3)0.0256 (4)0.0016 (3)0.0092 (3)0.0049 (3)
C90.0221 (13)0.0256 (12)0.0221 (10)0.0039 (10)0.0042 (9)0.0016 (9)
C100.0186 (10)0.0303 (11)0.0194 (11)0.0013 (8)0.0032 (9)0.0002 (9)
C110.0230 (16)0.0252 (10)0.0195 (15)0.0047 (9)0.0010 (14)0.0030 (9)
C120.0211 (10)0.0209 (10)0.0189 (12)0.0001 (8)0.0036 (10)0.0033 (8)
Cl20.0366 (10)0.0199 (3)0.0290 (6)0.0021 (6)0.0037 (7)0.0017 (3)
C130.0243 (11)0.0371 (13)0.0269 (12)0.0011 (9)0.0082 (9)0.0025 (10)
F10.061 (3)0.075 (5)0.031 (3)0.027 (3)0.025 (2)0.028 (3)
F20.047 (4)0.084 (6)0.066 (4)0.037 (4)0.036 (3)0.033 (4)
F30.032 (3)0.046 (3)0.034 (2)0.002 (2)0.017 (2)0.0078 (18)
N1'0.0171 (11)0.0231 (12)0.0145 (9)0.0004 (12)0.0000 (9)0.0037 (8)
N2'0.0165 (9)0.0266 (18)0.0159 (15)0.0032 (9)0.0013 (9)0.0046 (11)
N3'0.0154 (13)0.0370 (13)0.0167 (10)0.0001 (12)0.0010 (11)0.0069 (9)
N4'0.0218 (12)0.067 (2)0.0278 (16)0.0038 (12)0.0001 (10)0.0073 (13)
C1'0.0185 (14)0.0194 (14)0.0133 (9)0.0001 (14)0.0009 (11)0.0016 (8)
C2'0.0158 (12)0.0227 (14)0.0134 (9)0.0001 (9)0.0001 (10)0.0019 (9)
C3'0.0159 (11)0.0210 (15)0.0153 (13)0.0015 (9)0.0000 (9)0.0028 (9)
C4'0.0219 (13)0.0375 (19)0.0169 (15)0.0041 (11)0.0009 (9)0.0056 (11)
S1'0.020 (2)0.026 (2)0.0183 (17)0.0026 (15)0.0009 (13)0.0052 (14)
O1'0.033 (15)0.038 (9)0.030 (7)0.005 (7)0.006 (6)0.004 (6)
C5'0.048 (9)0.048 (9)0.026 (7)0.018 (8)0.005 (6)0.013 (6)
C6'0.046 (11)0.061 (14)0.032 (9)0.019 (11)0.008 (9)0.027 (10)
C7'0.0147 (13)0.0246 (11)0.0112 (10)0.0020 (9)0.0023 (9)0.0034 (8)
C8'0.0182 (15)0.0207 (11)0.0170 (11)0.0018 (9)0.0002 (9)0.0008 (9)
Cl1'0.0333 (4)0.0225 (3)0.0256 (4)0.0016 (3)0.0092 (3)0.0049 (3)
C9'0.0221 (13)0.0256 (12)0.0221 (10)0.0039 (10)0.0042 (9)0.0016 (9)
C10'0.0186 (10)0.0303 (11)0.0194 (11)0.0013 (8)0.0032 (9)0.0002 (9)
C11'0.0230 (16)0.0252 (10)0.0195 (15)0.0047 (9)0.0010 (14)0.0030 (9)
C12'0.0211 (10)0.0209 (10)0.0189 (12)0.0001 (8)0.0036 (10)0.0033 (8)
Cl2'0.0366 (10)0.0199 (3)0.0290 (6)0.0021 (6)0.0037 (7)0.0017 (3)
C13'0.0243 (11)0.0371 (13)0.0269 (12)0.0011 (9)0.0082 (9)0.0025 (10)
F1'0.025 (3)0.090 (8)0.017 (2)0.002 (3)0.005 (2)0.008 (3)
F2'0.048 (5)0.043 (4)0.041 (4)0.018 (3)0.030 (3)0.008 (3)
F3'0.029 (5)0.044 (4)0.041 (5)0.012 (4)0.019 (3)0.007 (3)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
N1—C11.364 (3)N1'—C1'1.369 (16)
N1—N21.378 (3)N1'—N2'1.369 (16)
N1—C71.419 (3)N1'—C7'1.428 (15)
N2—C31.325 (3)N2'—C3'1.368 (16)
N3—C11.335 (3)N3'—C1'1.323 (16)
N3—H3NA0.85 (2)N3'—H3NC0.8800
N3—H3NB0.85 (2)N3'—H3ND0.8800
N4—C41.139 (3)N4'—C4'1.123 (16)
C1—C21.398 (3)C1'—C2'1.397 (15)
C2—C31.404 (3)C2'—C3'1.362 (14)
C2—S11.743 (2)C2'—S1'1.757 (13)
C3—C41.446 (3)C3'—C4'1.455 (15)
S1—O11.504 (4)S1'—O1'1.519 (18)
S1—C51.801 (3)S1'—C5'1.793 (13)
C5—C61.518 (3)C5'—C6'1.527 (16)
C5—H5A0.9900C5'—H5'10.9900
C5—H5B0.9900C5'—H5'20.9900
C6—H6A0.9800C6'—H6'10.9800
C6—H6B0.9800C6'—H6'20.9800
C6—H6C0.9800C6'—H6'30.9800
C7—C81.389 (3)C7'—C8'1.383 (16)
C7—C121.391 (4)C7'—C12'1.392 (16)
C8—C91.388 (3)C8'—C9'1.385 (16)
C8—Cl11.724 (3)C8'—Cl1'1.723 (16)
C9—C101.389 (4)C9'—C10'1.391 (16)
C9—H90.9500C9'—H9'0.9500
C10—C111.379 (4)C10'—C11'1.382 (16)
C10—C131.507 (3)C10'—C13'1.503 (15)
C11—C121.386 (4)C11'—C12'1.384 (16)
C11—H110.9500C11'—H11'0.9500
C12—Cl21.728 (3)C12'—Cl2'1.727 (16)
C13—F11.299 (8)C13'—F1'1.294 (18)
C13—F21.334 (6)C13'—F2'1.333 (17)
C13—F31.342 (7)C13'—F3'1.338 (17)
C1—N1—N2113.6 (2)C1'—N1'—N2'114.4 (15)
C1—N1—C7128.4 (3)C1'—N1'—C7'120.2 (18)
N2—N1—C7117.4 (3)N2'—N1'—C7'124.2 (19)
C3—N2—N1102.6 (2)C3'—N2'—N1'101.8 (14)
C1—N3—H3NA122.6 (18)C1'—N3'—H3NC120.0
C1—N3—H3NB118 (2)C1'—N3'—H3ND120.0
H3NA—N3—H3NB116 (3)H3NC—N3'—H3ND120.0
N3—C1—N1122.3 (2)N3'—C1'—N1'121.5 (17)
N3—C1—C2132.3 (2)N3'—C1'—C2'134.3 (17)
N1—C1—C2105.4 (2)N1'—C1'—C2'104.0 (13)
C1—C2—C3104.42 (19)C3'—C2'—C1'106.9 (12)
C1—C2—S1130.98 (19)C3'—C2'—S1'134.8 (12)
C3—C2—S1124.60 (17)C1'—C2'—S1'118.2 (12)
N2—C3—C2113.9 (2)C2'—C3'—N2'112.8 (13)
N2—C3—C4120.0 (2)C2'—C3'—C4'134.7 (15)
C2—C3—C4126.1 (2)N2'—C3'—C4'112.4 (15)
N4—C4—C3177.2 (3)N4'—C4'—C3'176 (2)
O1—S1—C2108.4 (2)O1'—S1'—C2'107.9 (17)
O1—S1—C5105.8 (2)O1'—S1'—C5'103.5 (15)
C2—S1—C5100.32 (12)C2'—S1'—C5'99.6 (8)
C6—C5—S1109.32 (19)C6'—C5'—S1'107.8 (12)
C6—C5—H5A109.8C6'—C5'—H5'1110.2
S1—C5—H5A109.8S1'—C5'—H5'1110.2
C6—C5—H5B109.8C6'—C5'—H5'2110.2
S1—C5—H5B109.8S1'—C5'—H5'2110.2
H5A—C5—H5B108.3H5'1—C5'—H5'2108.5
C5—C6—H6A109.5C5'—C6'—H6'1109.5
C5—C6—H6B109.5C5'—C6'—H6'2109.5
H6A—C6—H6B109.5H6'1—C6'—H6'2109.5
C5—C6—H6C109.5C5'—C6'—H6'3109.5
H6A—C6—H6C109.5H6'1—C6'—H6'3109.5
H6B—C6—H6C109.5H6'2—C6'—H6'3109.5
C8—C7—C12119.2 (3)C8'—C7'—C12'118.6 (15)
C8—C7—N1120.6 (3)C8'—C7'—N1'121 (2)
C12—C7—N1120.2 (3)C12'—C7'—N1'119 (2)
C9—C8—C7120.7 (3)C7'—C8'—C9'121.8 (18)
C9—C8—Cl1119.3 (3)C7'—C8'—Cl1'118.4 (16)
C7—C8—Cl1120.0 (2)C9'—C8'—Cl1'119.8 (16)
C8—C9—C10118.4 (3)C8'—C9'—C10'118.2 (19)
C8—C9—H9120.8C8'—C9'—H9'120.9
C10—C9—H9120.8C10'—C9'—H9'120.9
C11—C10—C9122.2 (3)C11'—C10'—C9'121.3 (17)
C11—C10—C13119.4 (3)C11'—C10'—C13'121.0 (18)
C9—C10—C13118.3 (3)C9'—C10'—C13'117.7 (17)
C10—C11—C12118.4 (4)C10'—C11'—C12'119 (2)
C10—C11—H11120.8C10'—C11'—H11'120.5
C12—C11—H11120.8C12'—C11'—H11'120.5
C11—C12—C7121.0 (3)C11'—C12'—C7'120.9 (18)
C11—C12—Cl2119.0 (3)C11'—C12'—Cl2'122.9 (18)
C7—C12—Cl2119.9 (3)C7'—C12'—Cl2'116.1 (17)
F1—C13—F2108.7 (6)F1'—C13'—F2'108.0 (16)
F1—C13—F3108.8 (7)F1'—C13'—F3'105.8 (16)
F2—C13—F3105.9 (5)F2'—C13'—F3'104.8 (15)
F1—C13—C10111.0 (5)F1'—C13'—C10'113 (2)
F2—C13—C10111.2 (5)F2'—C13'—C10'112.7 (17)
F3—C13—C10111.1 (6)F3'—C13'—C10'111.8 (19)
C1—N1—N2—C31.1 (8)C1'—N1'—N2'—C3'0 (6)
C7—N1—N2—C3172.6 (5)C7'—N1'—N2'—C3'167 (4)
N2—N1—C1—N3179.3 (5)N2'—N1'—C1'—N3'176 (4)
C7—N1—C1—N38.9 (10)C7'—N1'—C1'—N3'8 (7)
N2—N1—C1—C20.6 (8)N2'—N1'—C1'—C2'1 (6)
C7—N1—C1—C2171.0 (6)C7'—N1'—C1'—C2'167 (3)
N3—C1—C2—C3180.0 (5)N3'—C1'—C2'—C3'176 (4)
N1—C1—C2—C30.1 (5)N1'—C1'—C2'—C3'2 (4)
N3—C1—C2—S10.1 (7)N3'—C1'—C2'—S1'3 (6)
N1—C1—C2—S1179.8 (4)N1'—C1'—C2'—S1'177 (3)
N1—N2—C3—C21.1 (6)C1'—C2'—C3'—N2'2 (4)
N1—N2—C3—C4179.7 (5)S1'—C2'—C3'—N2'177 (3)
C1—C2—C3—N20.8 (5)C1'—C2'—C3'—C4'176 (3)
S1—C2—C3—N2179.0 (4)S1'—C2'—C3'—C4'5 (5)
C1—C2—C3—C4180.0 (3)N1'—N2'—C3'—C2'1 (5)
S1—C2—C3—C40.1 (5)N1'—N2'—C3'—C4'177 (3)
C1—C2—S1—O145.6 (4)C3'—C2'—S1'—O1'75 (3)
C3—C2—S1—O1134.5 (3)C1'—C2'—S1'—O1'106 (3)
C1—C2—S1—C564.9 (4)C3'—C2'—S1'—C5'33 (3)
C3—C2—S1—C5114.9 (3)C1'—C2'—S1'—C5'146 (2)
O1—S1—C5—C675.9 (3)O1'—S1'—C5'—C6'71 (2)
C2—S1—C5—C6171.4 (2)C2'—S1'—C5'—C6'178.0 (17)
C1—N1—C7—C8107.1 (7)C1'—N1'—C7'—C8'107 (4)
N2—N1—C7—C882.8 (7)N2'—N1'—C7'—C8'86 (5)
C1—N1—C7—C1274.7 (8)C1'—N1'—C7'—C12'87 (5)
N2—N1—C7—C1295.4 (8)N2'—N1'—C7'—C12'80 (6)
C12—C7—C8—C94.9 (5)C12'—C7'—C8'—C9'0 (3)
N1—C7—C8—C9173.2 (3)N1'—C7'—C8'—C9'166 (2)
C12—C7—C8—Cl1174.8 (5)C12'—C7'—C8'—Cl1'177 (3)
N1—C7—C8—Cl17.1 (4)N1'—C7'—C8'—Cl1'16 (2)
C7—C8—C9—C101.6 (5)C7'—C8'—C9'—C10'0 (2)
Cl1—C8—C9—C10178.1 (4)Cl1'—C8'—C9'—C10'178 (3)
C8—C9—C10—C111.8 (8)C8'—C9'—C10'—C11'2 (5)
C8—C9—C10—C13173.8 (4)C8'—C9'—C10'—C13'179 (3)
C9—C10—C11—C121.7 (11)C9'—C10'—C11'—C12'4 (8)
C13—C10—C11—C12173.8 (7)C13'—C10'—C11'—C12'176 (5)
C10—C11—C12—C71.8 (12)C10'—C11'—C12'—C7'4 (8)
C10—C11—C12—Cl2178.8 (7)C10'—C11'—C12'—Cl2'180 (5)
C8—C7—C12—C115.1 (10)C8'—C7'—C12'—C11'2 (7)
N1—C7—C12—C11173.1 (7)N1'—C7'—C12'—C11'168 (5)
C8—C7—C12—Cl2175.6 (5)C8'—C7'—C12'—Cl2'178 (3)
N1—C7—C12—Cl26.3 (9)N1'—C7'—C12'—Cl2'15 (5)
C11—C10—C13—F1102.0 (11)C11'—C10'—C13'—F1'76 (5)
C9—C10—C13—F173.7 (10)C9'—C10'—C13'—F1'105 (3)
C11—C10—C13—F2136.9 (12)C11'—C10'—C13'—F2'161 (4)
C9—C10—C13—F247.4 (12)C9'—C10'—C13'—F2'18 (4)
C11—C10—C13—F319.2 (9)C11'—C10'—C13'—F3'44 (5)
C9—C10—C13—F3165.1 (7)C9'—C10'—C13'—F3'136 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N3—H3NA···O1i0.85 (2)1.99 (2)2.820 (6)164 (3)
N3—H3NB···N4ii0.85 (2)2.31 (2)3.150 (4)172 (3)
C9—H9···O1iii0.952.213.138 (6)165
N3—H3ND···O1i0.881.942.81 (5)167
N3—H3NC···N4ii0.882.102.87 (3)145
C9—H9···O1iii0.952.313.17 (4)151
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y+1, z+2; (ii) x1, y, z; (iii) x1/2, y+3/2, z1/2.
Selected torsion angles (°) in ethiprole top
Standard uncertainties for the minor component are much larger than for the major component as a result of its much lower occupancy factor.
MajorTorsionMinorTorsion
C1—N1—C7—C8107.1 (7)C1'—N1'—C7'—C8'107 (4)
C9—C10—C13—F173.7 (10)C9'—C10'—C13'—F1'105 (3)
C1—C2—S1—O1-45.6 (4)C1'—C2'—S1'—O1'-106 (3)
Statistics for intermediate and final model building and refinement stages top
Steps 1–4 in the table correspond to the sequential snapshots shown in Fig. 5. The result of step 5 is shown in Fig. 2.
StepR1 (%)wR2 (%)Δρmax (e Å-3)Δρmin (e Å-3)
116.4949.054.73-2.23
29.2232.704.87-1.16
36.7325.491.40-1.07
45.5121.730.81-0.65
53.657.650.37-0.25
 

Acknowledgements

One of the authors (V) is grateful to the DST–PURSE Project, Vijnana Bhavana, UOM for providing research facilities. HSY thanks UGC for a BSR Faculty fellowship for three years.

Funding information

Funding for this research was provided by: NSF (MRI CHE1625732) and the University of Kentucky (Bruker D8 Venture diffractometer) to SP.

References

First citationArthur, F. H. (2002). J. Econ. Entomol. 95, 1314–1318.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationBouwstra, J. A., Schouten, A., Kroon, J. & Helmholdt, R. B. (1985). Acta Cryst. C41, 420–426.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationBruker (2016). APEX3. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
First citationEbenezer, O., Shapi, M. & Tuszynski, J. A. (2022). Biomedicines 10, 1124.  CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
First citationFustero, S., Sánchez-Roselló, M., Barrio, P. & Simón-Fuentes, A. (2011). Chem. Rev. 111, 6984–7034.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationGroom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationKarrouchi, K., Radi, S., Ramli, Y., Taoufik, J., Mabkhot, Y. N., Al-Aizari, F. A. & Ansar, M. (2018). Molecules, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23010134  Google Scholar
First citationKrause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMohamed, S. K., Younes, S. H. H., Abdel-Raheem, E. M. M., Horton, P. N., Akkurt, M. & Glidewell, C. (2016). Acta Cryst. C72, 57–62.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationParkin, S. & Hope, H. (1998). Acta Cryst. B54, 339–344.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationPriyanka, P., Jayanna, B. K., Sunil Kumar, Y. C., Shreenivas, M. T., Srinivasa, G. R., Divakara, T. R., Yathirajan, H. S. & Parkin, S. (2022). Acta Cryst. E78, 1084–1088.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationRobertson, J. M., Shearer, H. M. M., Sim, G. A. & Watson, D. G. (1962). Acta Cryst. 15, 1–8.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationThorn, A., Dittrich, B. & Sheldrick, G. M. (2012). Acta Cryst. A68, 448–451.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationWu, T.-T. (1998). US Patent 5,814,652.  Google Scholar
First citationZhao, Q., Li, Y., Xiong, L. & Wang, Q. (2010). J. Agric. Food Chem. 58, 4992–4998.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds