Synthesis, crystal structure and reactivity of bis­(μ-2-methyl­pyridine N-oxide-κ2O:O)bis­[di­bromido­(2-methyl­pyridine N-oxide-κO)cobalt(II)] butanol monosolvate

Näther, C.; Jess, I.

doi:10.1107/S2056989023008228

research communications

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 79| Part 11| November 2023| Pages 972-976

https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989023008228

Open

access

Synthesis, crystal structure and reactivity of bis(μ-2-methylpyridine N-oxide-κ²O:O)bis[dibromido(2-methylpyridine N-oxide-κO)cobalt(II)] butanol monosolvate

Christian Näther ^a ^* and Inke Jess ^a

^aInstitut für Anorganische Chemie, Universität Kiel, Germany
^*Correspondence e-mail: cnaether@ac.uni-kiel.de

Edited by S. Parkin, University of Kentucky, USA (Received 8 September 2023; accepted 19 September 2023; online 3 October 2023)

Reaction of CoBr₂ with 2-methylpyridine N-oxide in n-butanol leads to the formation of the title compound, [CoBr₂]₂(2-methylpyridine N-oxide)₄·n-butanol or [Co₂Br₄(C₆H₇NO)₄]·C₄H₁₀O. The asymmetric unit of the title compound consists of one Co^II cation as well as two bromide anions and two 2-methylpyridine N-oxide coligands in general positions and one n-butanol molecule that is disordered around a center of inversion. The Co^II cations are fivefold coordinated by two bromide anions and one terminal as well as two bridging 2-methylpyridine N-oxide and linked by two symmetry-related μ-1,1(O,O) 2-methylpyridine N-oxide coligands into dinuclear units that are located on centers of inversion. In the crystal structure, the dinuclear units are also connected via pairs of C—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds into chains that elongate in the b-axis direction. The n-butanol molecules are located between the chains and are linked via O—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds each to one chain. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) measurements reveal that a pure phase has been obtained. Measurements using thermogravimetry and differential thermoanalysis shows one mass loss up to 523 K, in which the n-butanol molecules are removed. PXRD measurements of the residue obtained after n-butanol removal shows that a completely different crystalline phase has been obtained and IR investigations indicate significant structural changes in the Co coordination.

Keywords: crystal structure; synthesis; thermoanalytical investigations; cobalt thiocyanate; 2-methylpyridine N-oxide.

CCDC reference: 2295983

1. Chemical context

Transition-metal halide coordination compounds show a large structural variability because the halide anions can act as terminal or bridging ligands (Peng et al., 2010 ). This can lead to the formation of metal–halide substructures of different dimensionality, like, e.g. mono- and dinuclear units, chains, double chains or layered compounds, that can be further connected by the use of bridging coligands (Peng et al., 2010 and Näther et al., 2007 ). In general the dimensionality of the network predominantly depends on the ratio between the transition metal halide and the coligand. Compounds with a large ratio usually show a low dimensionality and form discrete units, whereas the dimensionality of the metal halide substructure increases with decreasing amount of the coligands (Näther et al., 2001 ; Näther and Jess, 2001 ). Even if in the majority of cases such compounds were prepared in solution, we have found that upon heating, the coligand-rich compounds lose their ligands stepwise, which leads to the formation of compounds with higher dimensionality (Näther et al., 2001; Näther & Jess, 2004 ). In the beginning, this approach was used for the preparation of Cu^I compounds (Näther et al., 2001, 2002 ), but later it was expanded to compounds with twofold positively charged cations, because even such compounds show a variety of structures of different dimensionality (Näther et al., 2007). In this context, it is noted that this thermal ligand removal can also be used for the synthesis of compounds with different anions such as, for example, thio- or selenocyanates (Werner et al., 2015 ; Rams et al., 2020 ).

In recent work, we exclusively used N-donor coligands that in most cases consist of pyridine derivatives. Therefore, the question arose whether this method could also be expanded to other coligands and in this context we became interested in pyridine N-oxide derivatives, because in contrast to pyridine derivatives they can act as terminal but also as bridging ligands. In this context, it would also be of interest if they show a similar thermal reactivity to that of the pyridine analogs. It is also noted that some transition-metal halide compounds with pyridine N-oxide derivatives have already been reported in the literature. In the course of our systematic work we used 2-methylpyridine N-oxide as ligand, for which some transition-metal halide compounds have already been reported in the literature. Compounds based on cobalt(II) are not reported, which also might be of interest in terms of magnetic properties. In the first experiments we reacted CoBr₂ with 2-methylpyridine in different solvents and from n-butanol we obtained blue-colored crystals that were identified by single-crystal structure analysis.

2. Structural commentary

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, [CoBr₂]₂(2-methylpyridine N-oxide)₄·n-butanol, consists of one Co^II cation as well as two bromide anions and two 2-methylpyridine N-oxide coligands in general positions (Fig. 1) and one n-butanol molecule that is located on a center of inversion and is therefore disordered due to symmetry (Fig. 2). This disorder remains constant if the refinement is performed in the space group P1 (see Refinement). The Co^II cations are fivefold coordinated by two bromide anions as well as one terminal and two bridging 2-methylpyridine N-oxide coligands. From the bond lengths and angles it is obvious that an irregular Co coordination is present, that is in between that of a trigonal bipyramid and a tetragonal pyramid (Table 1). Each of the two Co^II cations is linked by two μ-1,1(O,O) 2-methylpyridine N-oxide coligands into dinuclear units that are located on centers of inversion (Fig. 1). The distance between the two Co^II cations within the four-membered Co₂O₂ rings amounts to 3.4196 (7) Å and the rings are planar.

Table 1
Selected geometric parameters (Å, °)

Co1—Br1	2.4312 (4)	Co1—O1ⁱ	2.1968 (15)
Co1—Br2	2.5217 (4)	Co1—O11	1.9732 (17)
Co1—O1	1.9964 (16)

Br1—Co1—Br2	101.355 (16)	O11—Co1—Br2	97.54 (5)
O1—Co1—Br1	116.56 (5)	O11—Co1—O1ⁱ	83.12 (6)
O1ⁱ—Co1—Br1	95.39 (4)	O11—Co1—O1	126.08 (7)
O1—Co1—Br2	94.52 (4)	Co1—O1—Co1ⁱ	109.18 (7)
O1ⁱ—Co1—Br2	161.54 (4)	N1—O1—Co1	125.78 (12)
O1—Co1—O1ⁱ	70.82 (7)	N1—O1—Co1ⁱ	124.80 (12)
O11—Co1—Br1	112.08 (6)
Symmetry code: (i) .

Figure 1
Crystal structure of the dinuclear unit in the title compound with labeling and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. Symmetry code: (i) −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1.

Figure 2
Crystal structure of the disordered butanol molecule in the title compound with labeling and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level. Symmetry code: (ii) −x + 1, −y, −z. The disorder is shown with full and open bonds.

In this context, it is noted that a compound with the composition [CuCl₂]₂(4-methylpyridine N-oxide)₄ is reported, which shows a structure that is analogous to that of the title compound (refcode CMPYUC; Johnson & Watson, 1971a ). A similar structure is also observed for [MnBr₂]₂(4-methylpyridine N-oxide)₄(MeOH)₂ that consists of the same dimeric units but each of the Mn^II cations is additionally coordinated by a methanol molecule, leading to an octahedral coordination (refcode VONHOY; Lynch et al., 2019 ). Such a structure is also reported with 3-methylpyridine N-oxide (see Database survey). Finally, a related dinuclear complex with a tetrahedral coordination is observed in [CuCl₂]₂(4-methylpyridine N-oxide)₂ (refcode QQQBWJ; Kidd et al., 1967 ) and [CuBr₂]₂(4-methylpyridine N-oxide)₂ (refcode DURYIY; Nepveu et al., 1986 ), where the two terminal pyridine N-oxide ligands are missing.

3. Supramolecular features

In the crystal structure of compound 1, a number of intermolecular C—H⋯O and C—H⋯Br contacts are observed but most of them show angles far from linearity, indicating that these correspond to very weak interactions (Table 2). However, a few of them show distances and angles that point to intermolecular hydrogen bonding and if they are considered as significant interactions, the discrete complexes are connected into chains that propagate along the crystallographic a-axis direction (Fig. 3 and Table 2). The n-butanol molecules are located between these chains and are linked via O—H⋯Br hydrogen bonding to the chains. Because they are disordered around a center of inversion, in the middle of Fig. 3 it appears that they interconnect to neighboring chains, but in fact they are always arbitrarily connected to only one of these chains (Fig. 3).

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
C5—H5⋯Br1ⁱⁱ	0.95	3.12	3.704 (2)	121
C5—H5⋯Br1ⁱ	0.95	2.98	3.531 (2)	118
C6—H6A⋯O11ⁱ	0.98	2.45	3.259 (3)	140
C6—H6B⋯Br2ⁱⁱⁱ	0.98	2.88	3.852 (2)	172
C6—H6C⋯Br1	0.98	3.02	3.845 (2)	142
C12—H12⋯Br2^iv	0.95	2.99	3.676 (3)	130
C12—H12⋯O21^iv	0.95	2.55	3.441 (6)	156
C14—H14⋯Br1^v	0.95	3.11	3.747 (3)	126
C16—H16C⋯Br1ⁱⁱ	0.98	3.13	3.725 (3)	121
O21—H21⋯Br2	0.84	2.43	3.244 (4)	162
Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) x+1, y, z; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) .

Figure 3
Crystal structure of compound 1 viewed along the crystallographic a-axis. Intermolecular C—H⋯Br and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonding is shown as dashed lines. Please note that the n-butanol molecule is disordered around centers of inversion. For the n-butanol molecules between the chains the disorder is not removed, whereas for the n-butanol molecules left and right from the chains each one O atom is arbitrarily removed.

4. Thermoanalytical and powder X-ray powder investigations

Comparison of the experimental powder pattern of the title compound with that calculated from single-crystal data using structural data obtained at room temperature proves that a pure crystalline phase has been obtained (Fig. 4).

Figure 4
Experimental (top) and calculated powder pattern (bottom) for the title compound.

To investigate the thermal properties of the title compound including solvent removal, measurements using simultaneous differential thermoanalysis and thermogravimetry (DTA-TG) were performed. Upon heating, two mass losses are observed that are accompanied by endothermic events in the DTA curve (Fig. S1). From the DTG curve, it is obvious that the first mass loss is well resolved, which is not the case for the second mass loss. Moreover, the sample mass decreases continuously upon further heating, with no distinct step that points to the formation of a further compound (Fig. S1). The experimental mass loss of 8.9% in the first mass loss is in rough agreement with that calculated for the removal of the butanol molecules (Δm_calc = −7.8%), indicating the formation of a new compound with the composition CoBr₂(2-methylpyridine N-oxide)₂. It is noted that after the formation of the new intermediate compound there is an endothermic event where the sample mass does not change, indicating that the overall reaction is more complex.

PXRD investigations of the residue obtained after the first mass loss prove that a highly crystalline and completely different phase has been obtained (please compare Fig. 1 and S2) and IR investigations reveal significant differences, indicating that the Co coordination has changed (Figs. S3 and S4).

Finally, from the TG curve it is obvious that the first mass loss starts at very low temperature, indicating that the compound had already decomposed at room temperature (Fig. S1). Therefore, a freshly prepared batch of the title compound was stored for 60 h at room temperature and afterwards was investigated by PXRD, which proved that a transformation into the new crystalline phase obtained by solvent removal at elevated temperatures is obtained (Fig. S5).

5. Database survey

No crystal structures of cobalt halide compounds with methylpyridine N-oxide are reported in the CSD (version 5.43, last update March 2023; Groom et al., 2016 ) but some compounds with other transition-metal cations are known.

These include CuCl₂(2-methylpyridine N-oxide)₂ and ZnCl₂(2-methylpyridine N-oxide)₂, which form discrete complexes in which the metal cations are tetrahedrally coordinated (refcodes QQQBVY and QQQBXY; Kidd et al., 1967) as well as [CuCl₂]₃(2-methylpyridine N-oxide)₂(H₂O)₂ (refcode PIOCUA; Sager & Watson, 1968 ).

One compound with the composition MnCl₂(2-methylpyridine N-oxide)(H₂O) is also reported (refcode VEJMAB; Kang et al., 2017 ). In this compound, the Mn^II cations are octahedrally coordinated by one terminal chloride anion, one terminal water molecule as well as two bridging chloride anions and two bridging 2-methylpyridine N-oxide coligands. The cations are linked by pairs of alternating μ-1,1(O,O)-bridging 2-methylpyridine N-oxide coligands and each of the two μ(1,1) chloride anions into linear chains.

In [MnBr₂]₂(2-methylpyridine N-oxide)₂(H₂O)₄ bis(2-methylpyridine N-oxide) solvate, each Mn^II cation is octahedrally coordinated by two water molecules, two bromine atoms and two bridging 2-methylpyridine N-oxide coligands (refcode VONHEO; Lynch et al., 2019). Each of the two Mn^II cations is linked by two μ-1,1(O,O)-bridging 2-methylpyridine N-oxide ligands into dinuclear complexes.

There are additional compounds with, for example, protonated 2-methylpyridine N-oxide cations and tetrachloro aurate (refcode CICBIZ; Hussain & Aziz al-Hamound, 1984 ) as well as Co(ClO₄)₂(2-methylpyridine N-oxide)₅ (refcodes PICOCO and PICOCO01; Coyle & Ibers, 1970 and Bertini et al., 1975 ).

With 3-methylpyridine N-oxide and 4-methylpyridine N-oxide, no cobalt halide compounds are known but one compound with an essentially identical structure is reported with CuCl₂ and 4-methylpyridine N-oxide; this is mentioned in the Structural commentary (refcode CMPYUC; Johnson & Watson, 1971a).

With 4-methylpyridine N-oxide, discrete tetrahedral complexes with the composition MCl₂(4-methylpyridine N-oxide)₂ with M = Cu and Zn (refcodes CMPOCU, CMPOCU01 and QQQBXG; Johnson & Watson, 1971b and Kidd et al., 1967) and ZnI₂(4-methylpyridine N-oxide) are reported (refcode SANRUV; Shi et al., 2005 ).

Discrete tetrahedral complexes with CuCl₂ and ZnCl₂ are also reported with 3-methylpyridine N-oxide (refcodes QQQBWA, QQQBWA01 and QQQBXM; Kidd et al., 1967). Dinuclear complexes with 3-methylpyridine N-oxide and fourfold or sixfold metal coordination are observed in [CuCl₂]₂(3-methylpyridine N-oxide)₂ (refcode QQQBWG; Kidd et al., 1967) and in MnCl₂]₂(3-methylpyridine N-oxide)₂(H₂O)₂ (refcode VEJMEF; Kang et al., 2017). A dinuclear complex similar to that of the title compound but with an octahedral coordination is reported with MnBr₂ and 3-methylpyridine N-oxide (refcode VONHIS; Lynch et al., 2019). Finally, there are some additional compounds with other metal cations that are similar to that of the title compound (see Structural commentary).

6. Synthesis and crystallization

CoBr₂ (97%) was purchased from Alfa Aesar, 2-methylpyridine N-oxide (98%) and anhydrous n-butanol was purchased from Thermo Scientific.

Synthesis:

0.5 mmol (109 mg) of CoBr₂ and 2 mmol (218.0 mg) of 2-methylpyridine in 1 mL of anhydrous n-butanol were heated for 2 d at 388 K. After cooling to room temperature, blue-colored block-like crystals were obtained.

An IR spectrum of the title compound can be found in Fig. S4.

Finally, it is noted that because of the disorder of the n-butanol molecule we also tried to prepare a compound with 1,4-butanediol instead of butanol, which should occupy the same position as that of the n-butanol molecule, but microcrystalline powders were always obtained that showed a powder pattern identical to that of the residues obtained by solvent removal from the title compound.

Experimental details:

The data collection for single-crystal structure analysis was performed using an XtaLAB Synergy, Dualflex, HyPix diffractometer from Rigaku with Cu Kα radiation.

Thermogravimetry and differential thermoanalysis (TG-DTA) measurements were performed in a dynamic nitrogen atmosphere in Al₂O₃ crucibles using a STA-PT 1000 thermobalance from Linseis. The instrument was calibrated using standard reference materials.

The PXRD measurements were performed with a Stoe Transmission Powder Diffraction System (STADI P) equipped with a MYTHEN 1K detector and a Johansson-type Ge(111) monochromator using Cu Kα₁ radiation (λ = 1.540598 Å).

The IR spectra were measured using an ATI Mattson Genesis Series FTIR Spectrometer, control software: WINFIRST, from ATI Mattson.

7. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3. The C—H hydrogen atoms were positioned with idealized geometry (methyl H atoms allowed to rotate but not to tip) and were refined isotropically with U_iso(H) = 1.2U_eq(C) (1.5 for methyl hydrogen atoms) using a riding model.

Table 3
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	[Co₂Br₄(C₆H₇NO)₄]·C₄H₁₀O
M_r	948.12
Crystal system, space group	Triclinic, P $[\overline{1}]$
Temperature (K)	100
a, b, c (Å)	8.0900 (1), 9.5772 (1), 12.2400 (1)
α, β, γ (°)	70.242 (1), 76.004 (1), 83.860 (1)
V (Å³)	865.69 (2)
Z	1
Radiation type	Cu Kα
μ (mm⁻¹)	13.26
Crystal size (mm)	0.15 × 0.03 × 0.03

Data collection
Diffractometer	XtaLAB Synergy, Dualflex, HyPix
Absorption correction	Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2022 $[Rigaku OD (2022). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England.]$ )
T_min, T_max	0.721, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	18480, 3705, 3686
R_int	0.021
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.639

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.024, 0.065, 1.09
No. of reflections	3705
No. of parameters	204
No. of restraints	1
H-atom treatment	H-atom parameters constrained
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.50, −0.59
Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2022 $[Rigaku OD (2022). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England.]$ ), SHELXT2014/4 (Sheldrick, 2015a ), SHELXL2016/6 (Sheldrick, 2015b ), DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 1999 ) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ).

As already mentioned, the n-butanol molecule is disordered around a center of inversion, which is located exactly in the middle of the central C—C bond. Therefore, the generation of the symmetry-equivalent terminal atom formally lead to a molecule with a six-membered chain. However, the assignment of oxygen to the terminal atom lead to a much too high anisotropic displacement parameter, which decreased to a reasonable value if the site occupation is reduced to 0.5. After anisotropic refinement, only one electron-density peak is observed close to the O atom, which can clearly be assigned to the missing O—H hydrogen atom. For the C—O bond lengths, a restraint was used because otherwise a too long bond length was obtained. This presumably can be traced back to some disordering, because of the superposition of n-butanol molecules that are connect to different chains, which is also reflected in slightly enhanced components of the anisotropic displacement parameters of the C atoms of these molecules.

Finally it is noted that the disorder remains constant if the refinement is performed in the space group P1 and that no super structure reflections are visible that might point to a larger unit cell.

Supporting information

CCDC reference: 2295983

Crystal structure: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989023008228/pk2697sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989023008228/pk2697Isup2.hkl

DTG, TG and DTA curve of the title compound measured with 4C/min in a nitrogen atmosphere. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989023008228/pk2697sup3.png

Experimental powder pattern of the residue obtained after the first mass loss in a DTA-TG measurement of the title compound. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989023008228/pk2697sup4.png

IR spectrum of the residue obtained after the first mass loss in a DTA-TG measurement of the title compound. The wavenumbers of the most prominent vibrations are given. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989023008228/pk2697sup5.png

IR spectrum of the title compound. The wavenumbers of the most prominent vibrations are given. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989023008228/pk2697sup6.png

Experimental powder pattern of the residue obtained after storage of the title compound for 60 h at room-temperature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989023008228/pk2697sup7.png

checkCIF report

Computing details top

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO 1.171.42.67a (Rigaku OD, 2022); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO 1.171.42.67a (Rigaku OD, 2022); data reduction: CrysAlis PRO 1.171.42.67a (Rigaku OD, 2022); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT2014/4 (Sheldrick, 2015a); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2016/6 (Sheldrick, 2015b); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 1999); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Bis(µ-2-methylpyridine N-oxide-κ²O:O)bis[dibromido(2-methylpyridine N-oxide-κO)cobalt(II)] butanol monosolvate top

Crystal data top

[Co₂Br₄(C₆H₇NO)₄]·C₄H₁₀O	Z = 1
M_r = 948.12	F(000) = 468
Triclinic, P1	D_x = 1.819 Mg m⁻³
a = 8.0900 (1) Å	Cu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54184 Å
b = 9.5772 (1) Å	Cell parameters from 14929 reflections
c = 12.2400 (1) Å	θ = 3.9–79.9°
α = 70.242 (1)°	µ = 13.26 mm⁻¹
β = 76.004 (1)°	T = 100 K
γ = 83.860 (1)°	Block, dark blue
V = 865.69 (2) Å³	0.15 × 0.03 × 0.03 mm

Data collection top

XtaLAB Synergy, Dualflex, HyPix diffractometer	3705 independent reflections
Mirror monochromator	3686 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 10.0000 pixels mm^-1	R_int = 0.021
ω scans	θ_max = 80.2°, θ_min = 3.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlisPro; Rigaku OD, 2022)	h = −10→10
T_min = 0.721, T_max = 1.000	k = −12→12
18480 measured reflections	l = −12→15

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: full	H-atom parameters constrained
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.024	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0306P)² + 1.2686P] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
wR(F²) = 0.065	(Δ/σ)_max < 0.001
S = 1.09	Δρ_max = 0.50 e Å⁻³
3705 reflections	Δρ_min = −0.59 e Å⁻³
204 parameters	Extinction correction: SHELXL2016/6 (Sheldrick, 2015b), Fc^*=kFc[1+0.001xFc²λ³/sin(2θ)]^-1/4
1 restraint	Extinction coefficient: 0.00106 (14)
Primary atom site location: dual

Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq	Occ. (<1)
Co1	0.52210 (5)	0.46947 (4)	0.36734 (3)	0.01558 (10)
Br1	0.24435 (3)	0.41656 (3)	0.34944 (2)	0.02233 (8)
Br2	0.71203 (4)	0.28893 (3)	0.28069 (2)	0.02820 (9)
O1	0.5761 (2)	0.38106 (17)	0.52800 (14)	0.0163 (3)
N1	0.6713 (2)	0.2555 (2)	0.56405 (17)	0.0161 (4)
C1	0.5945 (3)	0.1227 (3)	0.60505 (19)	0.0183 (4)
C2	0.6944 (3)	−0.0046 (3)	0.6432 (2)	0.0238 (5)
H2	0.644348	−0.099275	0.673735	0.029*
C3	0.8660 (4)	0.0060 (3)	0.6368 (2)	0.0279 (5)
H3	0.933382	−0.081032	0.663242	0.033*
C4	0.9388 (3)	0.1438 (3)	0.5918 (2)	0.0264 (5)
H4	1.056708	0.152377	0.586252	0.032*
C5	0.8382 (3)	0.2689 (3)	0.5550 (2)	0.0212 (5)
H5	0.886759	0.364257	0.523258	0.025*
C6	0.4125 (3)	0.1211 (3)	0.6032 (2)	0.0211 (5)
H6A	0.345495	0.183462	0.647998	0.032*
H6B	0.372568	0.019130	0.639542	0.032*
H6C	0.398996	0.159651	0.520671	0.032*
O11	0.6147 (2)	0.65388 (19)	0.24397 (14)	0.0243 (4)
N11	0.6946 (3)	0.6523 (2)	0.13423 (17)	0.0234 (4)
C11	0.8634 (3)	0.6742 (3)	0.0986 (2)	0.0254 (5)
C12	0.9411 (4)	0.6781 (3)	−0.0169 (2)	0.0318 (6)
H12	1.059812	0.694910	−0.045090	0.038*
C13	0.8485 (4)	0.6581 (3)	−0.0914 (2)	0.0346 (7)
H13	0.903094	0.660251	−0.169909	0.041*
C14	0.6774 (4)	0.6351 (3)	−0.0508 (2)	0.0369 (7)
H14	0.611936	0.621342	−0.101029	0.044*
C15	0.6004 (4)	0.6320 (3)	0.0638 (2)	0.0320 (6)
H15	0.481643	0.615737	0.092873	0.038*
C16	0.9546 (4)	0.6917 (4)	0.1847 (3)	0.0347 (6)
H16A	0.911410	0.781415	0.204957	0.052*
H16B	1.076871	0.700157	0.148968	0.052*
H16C	0.935641	0.604983	0.256956	0.052*
O21	0.6568 (6)	0.1984 (4)	0.0597 (4)	0.0427 (10)	0.5
H21	0.673583	0.200477	0.124200	0.064*	0.5
C21	0.6912 (6)	0.0492 (4)	0.0530 (3)	0.0562 (10)
H21A	0.658475	−0.023433	0.133764	0.067*	0.5
H21B	0.814941	0.035705	0.023128	0.067*	0.5
H21C	0.665943	−0.027068	0.131402	0.067*	0.5
H21D	0.656102	0.147024	0.061153	0.067*	0.5
H21E	0.813823	0.047438	0.018754	0.067*	0.5
C22	0.5932 (5)	0.0184 (4)	−0.0294 (3)	0.0485 (9)
H22A	0.598140	0.106639	−0.101445	0.058*
H22B	0.650354	−0.065663	−0.054982	0.058*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
Co1	0.02026 (19)	0.01482 (18)	0.01137 (18)	−0.00042 (13)	−0.00241 (14)	−0.00463 (13)
Br1	0.02518 (13)	0.02280 (13)	0.02382 (14)	0.00051 (9)	−0.01136 (10)	−0.00991 (10)
Br2	0.03810 (16)	0.01941 (13)	0.02232 (14)	−0.00291 (10)	0.00953 (10)	−0.01123 (10)
O1	0.0195 (7)	0.0143 (7)	0.0161 (7)	0.0058 (6)	−0.0053 (6)	−0.0070 (6)
N1	0.0196 (9)	0.0134 (8)	0.0159 (9)	0.0051 (7)	−0.0058 (7)	−0.0061 (7)
C1	0.0250 (11)	0.0177 (10)	0.0122 (10)	−0.0007 (8)	−0.0029 (8)	−0.0057 (8)
C2	0.0314 (13)	0.0187 (11)	0.0200 (11)	0.0045 (9)	−0.0055 (10)	−0.0064 (9)
C3	0.0334 (13)	0.0264 (12)	0.0235 (12)	0.0117 (10)	−0.0107 (10)	−0.0085 (10)
C4	0.0224 (11)	0.0291 (13)	0.0305 (13)	0.0070 (10)	−0.0087 (10)	−0.0136 (11)
C5	0.0201 (11)	0.0223 (11)	0.0235 (12)	0.0013 (9)	−0.0034 (9)	−0.0119 (9)
C6	0.0247 (11)	0.0173 (11)	0.0215 (11)	−0.0026 (9)	−0.0048 (9)	−0.0062 (9)
O11	0.0383 (10)	0.0193 (8)	0.0119 (7)	−0.0059 (7)	0.0046 (7)	−0.0063 (6)
N11	0.0373 (12)	0.0158 (9)	0.0139 (9)	−0.0049 (8)	0.0030 (8)	−0.0054 (7)
C11	0.0348 (13)	0.0173 (11)	0.0199 (12)	0.0049 (9)	−0.0010 (10)	−0.0056 (9)
C12	0.0414 (15)	0.0250 (13)	0.0210 (12)	0.0047 (11)	0.0042 (11)	−0.0067 (10)
C13	0.0589 (19)	0.0239 (12)	0.0161 (11)	−0.0058 (12)	0.0055 (12)	−0.0085 (10)
C14	0.063 (2)	0.0294 (14)	0.0200 (13)	−0.0174 (13)	−0.0001 (13)	−0.0112 (11)
C15	0.0461 (16)	0.0282 (13)	0.0240 (13)	−0.0153 (12)	−0.0010 (12)	−0.0119 (11)
C16	0.0295 (13)	0.0441 (16)	0.0257 (13)	0.0102 (12)	−0.0078 (11)	−0.0072 (12)
O21	0.053 (3)	0.044 (2)	0.044 (3)	0.006 (2)	−0.027 (2)	−0.022 (2)
C21	0.079 (3)	0.053 (2)	0.0378 (18)	0.035 (2)	−0.0255 (18)	−0.0177 (16)
C22	0.081 (3)	0.0339 (16)	0.0270 (15)	0.0242 (17)	−0.0127 (15)	−0.0121 (13)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

Co1—Br1	2.4312 (4)	C11—C12	1.391 (3)
Co1—Br2	2.5217 (4)	C11—C16	1.485 (4)
Co1—O1	1.9964 (16)	C12—H12	0.9500
Co1—O1ⁱ	2.1968 (15)	C12—C13	1.381 (4)
Co1—O11	1.9732 (17)	C13—H13	0.9500
O1—N1	1.357 (2)	C13—C14	1.368 (5)
N1—C1	1.357 (3)	C14—H14	0.9500
N1—C5	1.344 (3)	C14—C15	1.382 (4)
C1—C2	1.394 (3)	C15—H15	0.9500
C1—C6	1.480 (3)	C16—H16A	0.9800
C2—H2	0.9500	C16—H16B	0.9800
C2—C3	1.384 (4)	C16—H16C	0.9800
C3—H3	0.9500	O21—H21	0.8400
C3—C4	1.382 (4)	O21—C21	1.4524 (10)
C4—H4	0.9500	C21—H21A	0.9900
C4—C5	1.380 (3)	C21—H21B	0.9900
C5—H5	0.9500	C21—H21C	0.9800
C6—H6A	0.9800	C21—H21D	0.9800
C6—H6B	0.9800	C21—H21E	0.9800
C6—H6C	0.9800	C21—C22	1.539 (5)
O11—N11	1.347 (2)	C22—C22ⁱⁱ	1.528 (8)
N11—C11	1.346 (4)	C22—H22A	0.9900
N11—C15	1.351 (4)	C22—H22B	0.9900

Br1—Co1—Br2	101.355 (16)	N11—C11—C12	117.5 (3)
O1—Co1—Br1	116.56 (5)	N11—C11—C16	118.2 (2)
O1ⁱ—Co1—Br1	95.39 (4)	C12—C11—C16	124.3 (3)
O1—Co1—Br2	94.52 (4)	C11—C12—H12	119.5
O1ⁱ—Co1—Br2	161.54 (4)	C13—C12—C11	121.1 (3)
O1—Co1—O1ⁱ	70.82 (7)	C13—C12—H12	119.5
O11—Co1—Br1	112.08 (6)	C12—C13—H13	120.4
O11—Co1—Br2	97.54 (5)	C14—C13—C12	119.3 (2)
O11—Co1—O1ⁱ	83.12 (6)	C14—C13—H13	120.4
O11—Co1—O1	126.08 (7)	C13—C14—H14	120.2
Co1—O1—Co1ⁱ	109.18 (7)	C13—C14—C15	119.5 (3)
N1—O1—Co1	125.78 (12)	C15—C14—H14	120.2
N1—O1—Co1ⁱ	124.80 (12)	N11—C15—C14	119.7 (3)
O1—N1—C1	118.60 (18)	N11—C15—H15	120.1
C5—N1—O1	118.18 (19)	C14—C15—H15	120.1
C5—N1—C1	123.2 (2)	C11—C16—H16A	109.5
N1—C1—C2	117.5 (2)	C11—C16—H16B	109.5
N1—C1—C6	118.4 (2)	C11—C16—H16C	109.5
C2—C1—C6	124.0 (2)	H16A—C16—H16B	109.5
C1—C2—H2	119.8	H16A—C16—H16C	109.5
C3—C2—C1	120.5 (2)	H16B—C16—H16C	109.5
C3—C2—H2	119.8	C21—O21—H21	109.5
C2—C3—H3	120.2	O21—C21—H21A	109.2
C4—C3—C2	119.7 (2)	O21—C21—H21B	109.2
C4—C3—H3	120.2	O21—C21—C22	112.1 (3)
C3—C4—H4	120.4	H21A—C21—H21B	107.9
C5—C4—C3	119.2 (2)	H21C—C21—H21D	109.5
C5—C4—H4	120.4	H21C—C21—H21E	109.5
N1—C5—C4	119.9 (2)	H21D—C21—H21E	109.5
N1—C5—H5	120.1	C22—C21—H21A	109.2
C4—C5—H5	120.1	C22—C21—H21B	109.2
C1—C6—H6A	109.5	C22—C21—H21C	109.5
C1—C6—H6B	109.5	C22—C21—H21D	109.5
C1—C6—H6C	109.5	C22—C21—H21E	109.5
H6A—C6—H6B	109.5	C21—C22—H22A	108.9
H6A—C6—H6C	109.5	C21—C22—H22B	108.9
H6B—C6—H6C	109.5	C22ⁱⁱ—C22—C21	113.3 (3)
N11—O11—Co1	120.09 (13)	C22ⁱⁱ—C22—H22A	108.9
O11—N11—C15	118.3 (2)	C22ⁱⁱ—C22—H22B	108.9
C11—N11—O11	118.8 (2)	H22A—C22—H22B	107.7
C11—N11—C15	122.9 (2)

Co1ⁱ—O1—N1—C1	102.20 (19)	C5—N1—C1—C6	−175.8 (2)
Co1—O1—N1—C1	−84.0 (2)	C6—C1—C2—C3	176.9 (2)
Co1ⁱ—O1—N1—C5	−79.2 (2)	O11—N11—C11—C12	−177.4 (2)
Co1—O1—N1—C5	94.6 (2)	O11—N11—C11—C16	3.0 (3)
Co1—O11—N11—C11	−111.6 (2)	O11—N11—C15—C14	177.7 (2)
Co1—O11—N11—C15	69.9 (3)	N11—C11—C12—C13	−0.9 (4)
O1—N1—C1—C2	−179.10 (19)	C11—N11—C15—C14	−0.7 (4)
O1—N1—C1—C6	2.8 (3)	C11—C12—C13—C14	0.5 (4)
O1—N1—C5—C4	179.4 (2)	C12—C13—C14—C15	−0.1 (4)
N1—C1—C2—C3	−1.1 (3)	C13—C14—C15—N11	0.2 (4)
C1—N1—C5—C4	−2.1 (4)	C15—N11—C11—C12	1.1 (4)
C1—C2—C3—C4	−0.3 (4)	C15—N11—C11—C16	−178.6 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C5	0.6 (4)	C16—C11—C12—C13	178.7 (3)
C3—C4—C5—N1	0.5 (4)	O21—C21—C22—C22ⁱⁱ	−79.5 (5)
C5—N1—C1—C2	2.3 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) −x+1, −y, −z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
C5—H5···Br1ⁱⁱⁱ	0.95	3.12	3.704 (2)	121
C5—H5···Br1ⁱ	0.95	2.98	3.531 (2)	118
C6—H6A···O11ⁱ	0.98	2.45	3.259 (3)	140
C6—H6B···Br2^iv	0.98	2.88	3.852 (2)	172
C6—H6C···Br1	0.98	3.02	3.845 (2)	142
C12—H12···Br2^v	0.95	2.99	3.676 (3)	130
C12—H12···O21^v	0.95	2.55	3.441 (6)	156
C14—H14···Br1^vi	0.95	3.11	3.747 (3)	126
C16—H16C···Br1ⁱⁱⁱ	0.98	3.13	3.725 (3)	121
O21—H21···Br2	0.84	2.43	3.244 (4)	162

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (iii) x+1, y, z; (iv) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (v) −x+2, −y+1, −z; (vi) −x+1, −y+1, −z.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the State of Schleswig-Holstein

References

Bertini, I., Dapporto, P., Gatteschi, A. & Scozzafava, A. (1975). Inorg. Chem. 14, 1639–1643. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (1999). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Coyle, B. A. & Ibers, J. A. (1970). Inorg. Chem. 9, 767–772. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Hussain, S. & Aziz Al-Hamoud, S. A. (1984). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 82, 111–117. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Kang, L., Lynch, G., Lynch, W. & Padgett, C. (2017). Acta Cryst. E73, 1434–1438. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Kidd, M. R., Sager, R. S. & Watson, W. H. (1967). Inorg. Chem. 6, 946–951. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Lynch, S., Lynch, G., Lynch, W. E. & Padgett, C. W. (2019). Acta Cryst. E75, 1284–1290. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Näther, C., Bhosekar, G. & Jess, I. (2007). Inorg. Chem. 46, 8079–8087. Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
Näther, C., Greve, J. & Jess, I. (2002). Solid State Sci. 4, 813–820. Google Scholar
Näther, C. & Jess, I. (2004). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 2868–2876. Google Scholar
Näther, C., Jess, I. & Greve, J. (2001). Polyhedron, 20, 1017–1022. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Näther, C. & Jess, I. (2001). Monatshefte für Chemie. 132, 897–910. Google Scholar
Nepveu, F., Astheimer, H., Paulus, H. & Haase, W. (1986). J. Coord. Chem. 14, 269–274. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Peng, R., Li, M. & Li, D. (2010). Coord. Chem. Rev. 254, 1–18. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Rams, M., Jochim, A., Böhme, M., Lohmiller, T., Ceglarska, M., Rams, M. M., Schnegg, A., Plass, W. & Näther, C. (2020). Chem. Eur. J. 26, 2837–2851. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rigaku OD (2022). CrysAlis PRO. Rigaku Oxford Diffraction, Yarnton, England. Google Scholar
Sager, R. S. & Watson, W. H. (1968). Inorg. Chem. 7, 2035–2040. CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Shi, J.-M., Liu, Z., Lu, J.-J. & Liu, L.-D. (2005). Acta Cryst. E61, m856–m857. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Watson, W. H. & Johnson, D. R. (1971a). Inorg. Chem. 10, 1068–1072. CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Watson, W. H. & Johnson, D. R. (1971b). Inorg. Chem. 10, 1281–1288. CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Werner, J., Runčevski, T., Dinnebier, R., Ebbinghaus, S. G., Suckert, S. & Näther, C. (2015). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 3236–3245. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.