CoII-catalysed synthesis of N-(4-meth­oxy­phen­yl)-5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxa­diazol-2-amine hemi­hydro­chloride monohydrate

Gautam, R.N.; Sonkar, S.P.; Yadav, S.; Nath, P.; Bharty, M.K.

doi:10.1107/S2056989024002044

research communications

CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN: 2056-9890

Volume 80| Part 4| April 2024| Pages 351-354

https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989024002044

Open

access

Co^II-catalysed synthesis of N-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amine hemihydrochloride monohydrate

Ram N Gautam,^a Sankatha P Sonkar,^b Shailendra Yadav,^b ‡ Paras Nath ^c and Manoj K. Bharty ^a ^*

^aDepartment of Chemistry, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005, India, ^bDepartment of Chemistry, AKS University, Satna-485001, India, and ^cBuddha PG College, Kushinagar - 274403, India
^*Correspondence e-mail: mkbharty@bhu.ac.in

Edited by W. T. A. Harrison, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom (Received 14 December 2023; accepted 1 March 2024; online 12 March 2024)

The title compound, C₁₄H₁₂N₄O₂·0.5HCl·H₂O or H(C₁₄H₁₂N₄O₂)₂⁺·Cl⁻·2H₂O, arose from the unexpected cyclization of isonicotinoyl-N-phenyl hydrazine carbothioamide catalysed by cobalt(II) acetate. The organic molecule is almost planar and a symmetric N⋯H⁺⋯N hydrogen bond links two of them together, with the H atom lying on a crystallographic twofold axis. The extended structure features N—H⋯O and O—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, which generate [001] chains. Weak C—H⋯Cl interactions cross-link the chains. The chloride ion has site symmetry 2. The major contributions to the Hirshfeld surface are from H⋯H (47.1%), Cl⋯H/H⋯Cl (total 10.8%), O⋯H/H⋯O (7.4%) and N⋯H/H⋯N (6.7%) interactions.

Keywords: 1,3,4-oxadiazole; cyclo-desulfurization; Hirshfeld surface analysis; crystal structure.

CCDC reference: 2238764

1. Chemical context

1,3,4-Oxadiazole derivatives have been studied in recent years for their diverse biological activities (Gond et al., 2023 ; Abd-Ellah et al., 2017 ; Bitla et al., 2020 ). As a result of their electron-accepting properties, high quantum yield, and good thermal and chemical stabilities, they have also been used in electroluminescent, optical and electron-transporting materials and chelating agents (Najare et al., 2020 ; Wu et al., 2012 ). Several methods for the synthesis of 1,3,4-oxadiazoles from acyclic precursors are available, which include oxidative cyclization of acylhydrazones (Jedlovská & Leško, 1994 ) and acylthiosemicarbazides (Omar et al., 1996 , Paswan et al., 2015 ). In the presence of a strong acid, an N-acylhydrazine carbodithioate is converted into a thiadiazole whereas in the presence of a weak acid or base or on complexation they can be cyclized into oxadiazole (Reid & Heindel, 1976 ; Jasinski et al., 2011 ).

We have previously reported the cyclo-desulfurization of several N-acylhydrazine carbodithioates into the corresponding 1,3,4-oxadiazole in the presence of manganese(II) acetate via the loss of H₂S where the Mn^II ion presumably behaves as a weak Lewis acid (Paswan et al., 2015, 2016 ; Gond et al., 2022 ). In the present work, a similar reaction is reported in presence of Co^II chloride. Similar Co^II-assisted cyclization reactions are also reported in the literature (Li et al., 2021 , 2023 ; Bharty et al., 2012 ).

2. Structural commentary

The compound crystallizes in the monoclinic crystal system in space group C2/c. The asymmetric unit consists of one organic molecule, half an equivalent of HCl and one water molecule (Fig. 1). The C3–C7/N4 pyridyl, C1/C2/N2/N3/O1 oxadiazole and C8–C13 phenyl rings are close to co-planar with the dihedral angles between pyridyl and oxadiazole rings being 4.88 (9)°, oxadiazole and phenyl rings 4.27 (10)° and pyridyl and phenyl rings 2.27 (9)°. The bond distances and angles of the 1,3,4-oxadiazole ring [C1—N2 = 1.298 (2); C2—N3 = 1.277 (2) Å] are in good agreement with values reported previously (Jasinski et al., 2011; Paswan et al., 2015, 2016; Singh et al., 2007 ). The C—N bond distance in the pyridine ring, C5—N4 = 1.336 (2) Å, is slightly longer than the corresponding bond in a similar compound (1.326 (2) Å; Singh et al., 2006 ), probably due to the N⋯H interaction (Fig. 2).

Figure 1
The molecular structure of the title compound showing 30% probability displacement ellipsoids with hydrogen bonds indicated by dashed lines.

Figure 2
The packing of the title compound viewed along the a-axis direction.

3. Supramolecular features

In the extended structure, two organic molecules are linked through their pyridine nitrogen atoms via the proton of the hydrochloric acid, which lies on a crystallographic twofold axis. This strong, symmetrical, almost linear N4⋯H4N⋯N4 hydrogen bond (Table 1) leads to a rod-like dimeric structure. These units form a layer-like structure when viewed along b axis of the unit cell (Fig. 3). The water molecules and chloride ions (site symmetry 2) are embedded in the space between the chains and are connected to them via N—H⋯O and O—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds, thereby generating [001] chains. Weak C—H⋯Cl interactions are also observed (Table 1; Fig. 2).

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A	D—H	H⋯A	D⋯A	D—H⋯A
N4—H4N⋯N4ⁱ	1.34 (1)	1.34 (1)	2.675 (3)	178 (3)
N1—H1⋯O3	0.86	2.02	2.875 (2)	172
O3—H22⋯Cl1	0.82 (4)	2.43 (4)	3.233 (2)	166 (3)
O3—H21⋯Cl1ⁱⁱ	0.81 (4)	2.55 (4)	3.359 (3)	172 (4)
C7—H7⋯Cl1	0.93	2.93	3.7940 (18)	155
C6—H6⋯Cl1ⁱⁱⁱ	0.93	2.82	3.7137 (18)	163
C5—H5⋯N3^iv	0.93	2.56	3.329 (2)	140
C9—H9⋯N2	0.93	2.34	2.969 (2)	125
Symmetry codes: (i) $[-x+1, y, -z+{\script{5\over 2}}]$ ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) $[x, -y, z+{\script{1\over 2}}]$ .

Figure 3
The packing of title compound viewed along the b-axis direction.

4. Hirshfeld Surface Analysis

To gain further insight into the intermolecular interactions, a Hirshfeld surface analysis was performed using Crystal Explorer 17.5 (Spackman et al., 2021 ). Fig. 4a,b shows the Hirshfeld surface mapped over d_norm. The red spots show the various hydrogen bonds noted above.

Figure 4
(a), (b) Two views of the Hirshfeld surface of the title compound mapped over d_norm, (c) fingerprint plot showing the total contribution of individual interactions and those delineated into (d) C⋯H/H⋯C interactions (6.6%), (e) Cl⋯H/H⋯Cl interactions (10.8%), (f) N⋯H/H⋯N interactions (6.7%) and (g) O⋯H/H⋯O interactions (7.4%).

The two-dimensional fingerprint plots are presented in Fig. 4c–g. The H⋯H (van der Waals) contacts dominate at 47.1%. Among the directional interactions present in the structure, the Cl⋯H/H⋯Cl (total 10.8%) contact is the most significant. Other contacts include 6.6% for C⋯H/H⋯C, 6.7% N⋯H/H⋯N and 7.4% for O⋯H/H⋯O interactions.

5. Synthesis and crystallization

2-Isonicotinoyl-N-(4-methoxyphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamide was prepared by adding 1.652 g (10.00 mmol) of 4-methoxy phenyl isothiocyanate in ethanol solution to 1.370 g (10.00 mmol) of isonicotinohydrazide and the reaction mixture was refluxed for 6 h at 333 K. Upon cooling, a white precipitate of 2-isonicotinoyl-N-(4-methoxyphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamide was obtained (Fig. 5), which was filtered off and washed with a 50:50 v/v mixture of water and ether. Then, 1.00 mmol of 2-isonicotinoyl-N-(4-methoxyphenyl)hydrazine-1-carbothioamide was dissolved in a 50:50 v/v mixture of methanol and chloroform, and a methanolic solution of 0.5 mmol of CoCl₂·6H₂O was added and stirred for 2 h, during which time the smell of H₂S was noted. The clear solution obtained was kept for crystallization and after 15 days, pale-pink blocks of the title compound were grown. Yield: 60.6%; m.p. 495–498 K. Analysis calculated for C₁₄H₁₂N₄O_2.0.5 HCl·H₂O: C, 55.21; H, 4.79; N, 18.39%; found: C, 55.25; H, 4.50; N, 18.55%.

Figure 5
Synthesis scheme for the title compound.

The IR spectrum (KBr disc) shows an absorption band at 3280 cm⁻¹ due to the NH group. The C=O band is absent and a new band is observed at 1623 cm⁻¹ corresponding to the C=N bond. In addition, a blue shift is observed for the N=N band at 1179 cm⁻¹ compared to the single bond in the thiosemicarbazide intermediate (Fig. 1 in the supporting information). All these data indicate that the carbothioamide moiety has been transformed into the corresponding oxadiazole (Chandra et al., 2022 ; Jaiswal et al., 2023a b ).

The ¹H NMR spectrum of the title compound in DMSO-d6 displays peaks at δ 10.69 ppm due to the NH proton, at δ 8.91 and 7.90 ppm due to the pyridyl ring protons and at δ 7.55 and 6.98 ppm due to phenyl ring protons. The methoxy protons appear at δ 3.74 ppm. (Fig. 2 in the supporting information). In the ¹³C NMR spectrum, peaks at δ 156.9 and 155.2 ppm arise from oxadiazole ring carbon atoms, the methoxy C atom appears at 55.7 ppm and the phenyl and pyridyl carbon atoms are observed in the range δ 114.8–132.4 ppm (Fig. 3 in the supporting information). An absorption at 338 nm in the electronic spectrum of the title compound can be attributed to its π–π* transition (Fig. 4 in the supporting information). It displays fluorescence at 418 nm upon excitation at 338 nm (Fig. 5 in the supporting information) when dissolved in 10⁻⁵ M DMSO solution.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2. Atom H4N was freely refined. Other H atoms were placed in idealized locations (N—H = 0.86 Å, C—H = 0.93–0. 96 Å) and refined using a riding model with U_iso(H) =1.2U_eq(C,N) or 1.5U_eq(C-methyl). Asymmetric N—H⋯N/N⋯H—N refinements with the H atom displaced towards one of the N atoms were inconclusive and atom H4N was placed on the twofold axis.

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula	C₂₈H₂₅N₈O₄⁺·Cl⁻·2H₂O
M_r	609.04
Crystal system, space group	Monoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K)	293
a, b, c (Å)	20.5406 (9), 13.7457 (5), 10.5650 (3)
β (°)	107.006 (4)
V (Å³)	2852.54 (19)
Z	4
Radiation type	Mo Kα
μ (mm⁻¹)	0.19
Crystal size (mm)	0.32 × 0.26 × 0.24

Data collection
Diffractometer	Bruker multiwire proportional
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections	16772, 3121, 2026
R_int	0.029
(sin θ/λ)_max (Å⁻¹)	0.639

Refinement
R[F² > 2σ(F²)], wR(F²), S	0.041, 0.119, 0.98
No. of reflections	3009
No. of parameters	205
H-atom treatment	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρ_max, Δρ_min (e Å⁻³)	0.20, −0.18
Computer programs: FRAMBO (Bruker, 2004 ), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ) and SHELXL2018/3 (Sheldrick, 2015 ).

Supporting information

CCDC reference: 2238764

Crystal structure: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989024002044/hb8088sup1.cif

Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989024002044/hb8088Isup2.hkl

Spectra. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989024002044/hb8088sup3.docx

Supporting information file. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989024002044/hb8088Isup4.cml

checkCIF report

Computing details top

N-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-5-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-amine 4-{5-[(4-methoxyphenyl)amino]-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-yl}pyridin-1-ium chloride dihydrate top

Crystal data top

C₂₈H₂₅N₈O₄⁺·Cl⁻·2H₂O	F(000) = 1276
M_r = 609.04	D_x = 1.418 Mg m⁻³
Monoclinic, C2/c	Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 20.5406 (9) Å	Cell parameters from 8519 reflections
b = 13.7457 (5) Å	θ = 2.5–26.2°
c = 10.5650 (3) Å	µ = 0.19 mm⁻¹
β = 107.006 (4)°	T = 293 K
V = 2852.54 (19) Å³	Block, pinkish
Z = 4	0.32 × 0.26 × 0.24 mm

Data collection top

Bruker multiwire proportional diffractometer	R_int = 0.029
Radiation source: sealed tube	θ_max = 27.0°, θ_min = 2.5°
phi and ω scans	h = −25→25
16772 measured reflections	k = −17→13
3121 independent reflections	l = −13→11
2026 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Refinement top

Refinement on F²	Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: full	Hydrogen site location: mixed
R[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.041	H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F²) = 0.119	w = 1/[σ²(F_o²) + (0.0602P)² + 1.1461P] where P = (F_o² + 2F_c²)/3
S = 0.98	(Δ/σ)_max < 0.001
3009 reflections	Δρ_max = 0.20 e Å⁻³
205 parameters	Δρ_min = −0.18 e Å⁻³
0 restraints

Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	x	y	z	U_iso*/U_eq
Cl1	0.500000	0.49848 (5)	0.750000	0.0696 (3)
O1	0.60240 (6)	0.24882 (8)	0.73971 (10)	0.0438 (3)
O2	0.73500 (8)	0.20297 (12)	0.12535 (14)	0.0738 (4)
N4	0.52376 (7)	0.20300 (10)	1.14485 (13)	0.0447 (4)
N1	0.63480 (7)	0.26868 (11)	0.55203 (13)	0.0470 (4)
H1	0.627028	0.329212	0.562248	0.056*
N2	0.62683 (8)	0.11322 (11)	0.64893 (14)	0.0567 (4)
O3	0.59808 (11)	0.46965 (13)	0.5629 (3)	0.0817 (5)
N3	0.60728 (9)	0.08972 (11)	0.76220 (15)	0.0579 (4)
C3	0.57017 (8)	0.18290 (12)	0.92666 (15)	0.0395 (4)
C1	0.62287 (8)	0.20733 (13)	0.64050 (15)	0.0423 (4)
C2	0.59381 (8)	0.16960 (12)	0.81088 (16)	0.0421 (4)
C7	0.55180 (9)	0.27308 (13)	0.96298 (16)	0.0465 (4)
H7	0.554704	0.328207	0.913884	0.056*
C8	0.65878 (8)	0.24517 (13)	0.44342 (16)	0.0438 (4)
C6	0.52914 (9)	0.27987 (13)	1.07303 (16)	0.0481 (4)
H6	0.517179	0.340647	1.097866	0.058*
C4	0.56536 (9)	0.10281 (13)	1.00308 (17)	0.0489 (4)
H4	0.577659	0.041269	0.981505	0.059*
C5	0.54218 (9)	0.11591 (13)	1.11088 (17)	0.0504 (5)
H5	0.539154	0.062199	1.162390	0.060*
C13	0.66769 (10)	0.32122 (14)	0.36423 (17)	0.0526 (5)
H13	0.656561	0.384241	0.382362	0.063*
C11	0.70949 (9)	0.21120 (15)	0.23119 (17)	0.0537 (5)
C9	0.67449 (9)	0.15188 (14)	0.41413 (17)	0.0514 (5)
H9	0.668165	0.100040	0.465852	0.062*
C12	0.69280 (10)	0.30451 (15)	0.25909 (19)	0.0578 (5)
H12	0.698590	0.356168	0.206558	0.069*
C10	0.69972 (10)	0.13515 (15)	0.30768 (18)	0.0560 (5)
H10	0.710046	0.072074	0.288146	0.067*
C14	0.75778 (13)	0.11035 (19)	0.0984 (2)	0.0827 (7)
H14A	0.774283	0.114498	0.022456	0.124*
H14B	0.793818	0.088726	0.173472	0.124*
H14C	0.720706	0.064931	0.081080	0.124*
H22	0.5797 (18)	0.477 (2)	0.621 (3)	0.129 (14)*
H21	0.578 (2)	0.478 (3)	0.485 (4)	0.159 (18)*
H4N	0.500000	0.205 (2)	1.250000	0.092 (10)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å²) top

	U¹¹	U²²	U³³	U¹²	U¹³	U²³
Cl1	0.1079 (7)	0.0494 (4)	0.0619 (4)	0.000	0.0413 (4)	0.000
O1	0.0531 (7)	0.0434 (7)	0.0391 (6)	0.0010 (5)	0.0201 (5)	−0.0004 (5)
O2	0.0879 (11)	0.0901 (11)	0.0591 (8)	0.0004 (9)	0.0458 (8)	−0.0021 (8)
N4	0.0507 (9)	0.0484 (9)	0.0375 (7)	0.0013 (7)	0.0168 (6)	−0.0010 (6)
N1	0.0547 (9)	0.0476 (8)	0.0434 (8)	−0.0006 (7)	0.0218 (7)	0.0003 (7)
N2	0.0838 (12)	0.0460 (10)	0.0518 (9)	−0.0039 (8)	0.0380 (8)	−0.0053 (7)
O3	0.1057 (15)	0.0670 (11)	0.0814 (13)	0.0140 (9)	0.0413 (13)	−0.0026 (9)
N3	0.0875 (12)	0.0457 (9)	0.0520 (9)	−0.0028 (8)	0.0386 (9)	−0.0040 (7)
C3	0.0413 (9)	0.0428 (9)	0.0346 (8)	−0.0022 (7)	0.0115 (7)	−0.0011 (7)
C1	0.0421 (9)	0.0488 (10)	0.0371 (9)	−0.0036 (8)	0.0133 (7)	−0.0054 (7)
C2	0.0471 (10)	0.0406 (9)	0.0395 (9)	−0.0022 (7)	0.0141 (8)	−0.0009 (7)
C7	0.0604 (11)	0.0395 (9)	0.0421 (9)	0.0029 (8)	0.0189 (8)	0.0033 (7)
C8	0.0408 (9)	0.0546 (11)	0.0361 (8)	−0.0040 (8)	0.0116 (7)	−0.0016 (8)
C6	0.0597 (11)	0.0424 (10)	0.0457 (10)	0.0045 (8)	0.0209 (9)	−0.0018 (8)
C4	0.0628 (12)	0.0398 (10)	0.0493 (10)	0.0033 (8)	0.0245 (9)	0.0018 (8)
C5	0.0633 (12)	0.0445 (10)	0.0476 (10)	0.0016 (9)	0.0228 (9)	0.0079 (8)
C13	0.0592 (12)	0.0552 (11)	0.0469 (10)	−0.0007 (9)	0.0208 (9)	0.0019 (8)
C11	0.0504 (11)	0.0751 (14)	0.0397 (9)	−0.0067 (9)	0.0195 (8)	−0.0036 (9)
C9	0.0597 (12)	0.0548 (12)	0.0446 (10)	−0.0049 (9)	0.0231 (9)	0.0002 (8)
C12	0.0639 (13)	0.0655 (13)	0.0484 (10)	−0.0049 (10)	0.0235 (9)	0.0070 (9)
C10	0.0595 (12)	0.0595 (12)	0.0534 (11)	−0.0021 (9)	0.0236 (9)	−0.0085 (9)
C14	0.0935 (18)	0.0996 (19)	0.0706 (14)	−0.0045 (15)	0.0485 (13)	−0.0172 (13)

Geometric parameters (Å, º) top

O1—C1	1.3634 (19)	C7—H7	0.9300
O1—C2	1.3637 (19)	C8—C9	1.379 (3)
O2—C11	1.371 (2)	C8—C13	1.384 (2)
O2—C14	1.414 (3)	C6—H6	0.9300
N4—C6	1.324 (2)	C4—C5	1.369 (2)
N4—C5	1.336 (2)	C4—H4	0.9300
N4—H4N	1.3379 (15)	C5—H5	0.9300
N1—C1	1.334 (2)	C13—C12	1.374 (3)
N1—C8	1.412 (2)	C13—H13	0.9300
N1—H1	0.8600	C11—C10	1.371 (3)
N2—C1	1.298 (2)	C11—C12	1.382 (3)
N2—N3	1.407 (2)	C9—C10	1.388 (2)
O3—H22	0.82 (4)	C9—H9	0.9300
O3—H21	0.81 (4)	C12—H12	0.9300
N3—C2	1.277 (2)	C10—H10	0.9300
C3—C7	1.382 (2)	C14—H14A	0.9600
C3—C4	1.386 (2)	C14—H14B	0.9600
C3—C2	1.454 (2)	C14—H14C	0.9600
C7—C6	1.376 (2)

C1—O1—C2	102.04 (13)	C7—C6—H6	118.8
C11—O2—C14	117.79 (17)	C5—C4—C3	118.79 (16)
C6—N4—C5	118.91 (15)	C5—C4—H4	120.6
C6—N4—H4N	124.9 (13)	C3—C4—H4	120.6
C5—N4—H4N	116.2 (13)	N4—C5—C4	122.43 (16)
C1—N1—C8	127.16 (15)	N4—C5—H5	118.8
C1—N1—H1	116.4	C4—C5—H5	118.8
C8—N1—H1	116.4	C12—C13—C8	120.64 (18)
C1—N2—N3	105.04 (14)	C12—C13—H13	119.7
H22—O3—H21	122 (4)	C8—C13—H13	119.7
C2—N3—N2	107.14 (14)	C10—C11—O2	125.05 (19)
C7—C3—C4	118.62 (16)	C10—C11—C12	119.59 (17)
C7—C3—C2	122.13 (15)	O2—C11—C12	115.36 (18)
C4—C3—C2	119.25 (15)	C8—C9—C10	120.20 (18)
N2—C1—N1	131.13 (16)	C8—C9—H9	119.9
N2—C1—O1	113.05 (14)	C10—C9—H9	119.9
N1—C1—O1	115.82 (15)	C13—C12—C11	120.19 (18)
N3—C2—O1	112.73 (15)	C13—C12—H12	119.9
N3—C2—C3	127.75 (15)	C11—C12—H12	119.9
O1—C2—C3	119.50 (14)	C11—C10—C9	120.31 (19)
C6—C7—C3	118.86 (16)	C11—C10—H10	119.8
C6—C7—H7	120.6	C9—C10—H10	119.8
C3—C7—H7	120.6	O2—C14—H14A	109.5
C9—C8—C13	119.05 (17)	O2—C14—H14B	109.5
C9—C8—N1	123.71 (16)	H14A—C14—H14B	109.5
C13—C8—N1	117.23 (16)	O2—C14—H14C	109.5
N4—C6—C7	122.38 (16)	H14A—C14—H14C	109.5
N4—C6—H6	118.8	H14B—C14—H14C	109.5

C1—N2—N3—C2	−0.2 (2)	C5—N4—C6—C7	1.3 (3)
N3—N2—C1—N1	−179.21 (18)	C3—C7—C6—N4	−0.6 (3)
N3—N2—C1—O1	0.22 (19)	C7—C3—C4—C5	0.5 (3)
C8—N1—C1—N2	−3.2 (3)	C2—C3—C4—C5	−179.14 (16)
C8—N1—C1—O1	177.42 (14)	C6—N4—C5—C4	−1.2 (3)
C2—O1—C1—N2	−0.20 (18)	C3—C4—C5—N4	0.3 (3)
C2—O1—C1—N1	179.33 (14)	C9—C8—C13—C12	−1.0 (3)
N2—N3—C2—O1	0.0 (2)	N1—C8—C13—C12	178.02 (16)
N2—N3—C2—C3	178.69 (16)	C14—O2—C11—C10	−5.0 (3)
C1—O1—C2—N3	0.08 (18)	C14—O2—C11—C12	175.28 (18)
C1—O1—C2—C3	−178.69 (14)	C13—C8—C9—C10	0.9 (3)
C7—C3—C2—N3	−174.38 (18)	N1—C8—C9—C10	−178.10 (15)
C4—C3—C2—N3	5.2 (3)	C8—C13—C12—C11	0.0 (3)
C7—C3—C2—O1	4.2 (2)	C10—C11—C12—C13	1.1 (3)
C4—C3—C2—O1	−176.23 (15)	O2—C11—C12—C13	−179.10 (17)
C4—C3—C7—C6	−0.3 (3)	O2—C11—C10—C9	178.98 (18)
C2—C3—C7—C6	179.26 (15)	C12—C11—C10—C9	−1.3 (3)
C1—N1—C8—C9	−0.8 (3)	C8—C9—C10—C11	0.3 (3)
C1—N1—C8—C13	−179.82 (16)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top

D—H···A	D—H	H···A	D···A	D—H···A
N4—H4N···N4ⁱ	1.34 (1)	1.34 (1)	2.675 (3)	178 (3)
N1—H1···O3	0.86	2.02	2.875 (2)	172
O3—H22···Cl1	0.82 (4)	2.43 (4)	3.233 (2)	166 (3)
O3—H21···Cl1ⁱⁱ	0.81 (4)	2.55 (4)	3.359 (3)	172 (4)
C7—H7···Cl1	0.93	2.93	3.7940 (18)	155
C6—H6···Cl1ⁱⁱⁱ	0.93	2.82	3.7137 (18)	163
C5—H5···N3^iv	0.93	2.56	3.329 (2)	140
C9—H9···N2	0.93	2.34	2.969 (2)	125

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y, −z+5/2; (ii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (iii) −x+1, −y+1, −z+2; (iv) x, −y, z+1/2.

Footnotes

‡Additional correspondence author, email: syshailendra5@gmail.com.

Acknowledgements

MK expresses gratitude to BHU for the financial support provided through the IoE Research Grant for Faculty Development Scheme No. 6031.

References

Abd-Ellah, H. S., Abdel-Aziz, M., Shoman, M. E., Beshr, E. A. M., Kaoud, T. S. & Ahmed, A. F. F. (2017). Bioorg. Chem. 74, 15–29. Web of Science CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bharty, M. K., Bharti, A., Dani, R. K., Dulare, R., Bharati, P. & Singh, N. K. (2012). J. Mol. Struct. 1011, 34–41. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bitla, S., Sagurthi, S. R., Dhanavath, R., Puchakayala, M. R., Birudaraju, S., Gayatri, A. A., Bhukya, V. K. & Atcha, K. R. (2020). J. Mol. Struct. 1220, 128705. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Bruker (2004). FRAMBO. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Chandra, S., Gond, M. K., Jaiswal, S., Bharty, M. K., Maiti, B., Kushwaha, D. & Butcher, R. J. (2022). J. Mol. Struct. 1249, 131637. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Gond, M. K., Rai, N., Chandra, B., Gautam, V., Garai, S., Butcher, R. J. & Bharty, M. K. (2023). Dalton Trans. 52, 10213–10221. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gond, M. K., Shukla, A., Pandey, S. K., Bharty, M. K., Maiti, B., Acharya, A., Tiwari, N., Katiyar, D. & Butcher, R. J. (2022). J. Mol. Struct. 1249, 131547. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Jaiswal, S., Pandey, S. K., Minocha, T., Chandra, S., Bharty, M. K., Yadav, S. K., Kushwaha, D. & Butcher, R. J. (2023a). J. Mol. Struct. 1281, 135075. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Jaiswal, S., Pandey, S. K., Prajapati, J., Chandra, S., Gond, M. K., Bharty, M. K., Tiwari, I. & Butcher, R. J. (2023b). Appl. Organom Chem. 37, e7085. Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Jasinski, J. P., Bharty, M. K., Singh, N. K., Kushwaha, S. K. & Butcher, R. J. (2011). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 41, 6–11. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Jedlovská, E. & Leško, J. (1994). Synth. Commun. 24, 1879–1885. Google Scholar
Li, J. L., Li, H. Y., Zhang, S. S., Shen, S., Yang, X. L. & Niu, X. (2023). J. Org. Chem. 88, 14874–14886. Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li, X., Liao, S., Chen, Y., Xia, C. & Wang, G. (2021). J. Chem. Res. 45, 1038–1041. Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Najare, M. S., Patil, M. K., Nadaf, A. A., Mantur, S., Garbhagudi, M., Gaonkar, S., Inamdar, S. R. & Khazi, I. A. M. (2020). J. Mol. Struct. 1199, 127032. Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Omar, F. A., Mahfouz, N. M. & Rahman, M. A. (1996). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 31, 819–825. CrossRef CAS PubMed Web of Science Google Scholar
Paswan, S., Bharty, M. K., Gupta, S. K., Butcher, R. J. & Jasinski, J. P. (2016). IUCrData, 1, x161724. Google Scholar
Paswan, S., Bharty, M. K., Kumari, S., Gupta, S. K. & Singh, N. K. (2015). Acta Cryst. E71, o880–o881. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Reid, J. R. & Heindel, N. D. (1976). J. Heterocycl. Chem. 13, 925–926. CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Singh, N. K., Butcher, R. J., Bharty, M. K., Srivastava, A. K. & Tripathi, P. (2006). Acta Cryst. E62, o3473–o3474. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Singh, N. K., Butcher, R. J., Tripathi, P., Srivastava, A. K. & Bharty, M. K. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, o782–o784. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spackman, P. R., Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2021). J. Appl. Cryst. 54, 1006–1011. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wu, C. A., Chou, H. H., Shih, C. H., Wu, F. I., Cheng, C. H., Huang, H. L., Chao, T. C. & Tseng, M. R. (2012). J. Mater. Chem. 22, 17792–17799. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.