research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Two crystal structures of copper(II) complexes and adducts based on the neutral N1,N1-di­methyl-N2-(pyridin-2-ylmeth­yl)ethane-1,2-di­amine ligand

crossmark logo

aDepartment of Basic Sciences, Al-Huson University College, Al-Balqa Applied, University, Irbid, Jordan, and bInstitut für Biochemie, Universität Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Strasse 5, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by K. V. Domasevitch, National Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv, Ukraine (Received 17 June 2025; accepted 3 July 2025; online 8 July 2025)

From the reaction of copper(II) chloride dihydrate with N1,N1-dimethyl-N2-(pyridin-2-ylmeth­yl)ethane-1,2-di­amine (denoted N^N^N) a new species comprising three distinct complexes crystallized, namely, aqua­chlorido­[N1,N1-dimethyl-N2-(pyridin-2-ylmeth­yl)ethane-1,2-di­amine-κ3N,N′,N′′]copper(II) chlorido­[N1,N1-dimethyl-N2-(pyridin-2-ylmeth­yl)ethane-1,2-di­amine-κ3N,N′,N′′]copper(II) tetra­chlorido­cuprate(II), [CuCl(C10H17N3)(H2O)][CuCl(C10H17N3)][CuCl4] or [Cu(N^N^N)(H2O)Cl][Cu(N^N^N)Cl2][CuCl4], the latter two of which form an adduct. This complex was reacted with ammonium thio­cyanate to form [Cu(N^N^N)(NCS)2], which crystallized with two independent mol­ecules and a partial water in the asymmetric unit very similarly to the already reported structure of this compound. Both crystal structures show a rather complex set of inter­molecular inter­actions including hydrogen bonding and what may be described as chalcogen bonding, pnictogen bonding and/or coinage bonding. The mol­ecular structures, intra­molecular inter­actions and packing patterns are discussed in detail and the more unusual ones are set into the context of structures available in the literature.

1. Chemical context

In the first decade of this century, copper has started to become an element of growing inter­est in the context of developing therapeutics against cancer (e.g. Wang & Guo, 2006[Wang, T. & Guo, Z. (2006). Curr. Med. Chem. 13, 525-537.]; Cvek et al., 2008[Cvek, B., Milacic, V., Taraba, J. & Dou, Q. P. (2008). J. Med. Chem. 51, 6256-6258.]; Tardito & Marchiò, 2009[Tardito, S. & Marchiò, L. (2009). Curr. Med. Chem. 16, 1325-1348.]; Marzano et al., 2009[Marzano, C., Pellei, M., Tisato, F. & Santini, C. (2009). Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 9, 185-211.]). In a respective review article, a vast number of synthetic attempts and biological studies towards this goal were discussed in detail and some important conclusions were drawn based on this meta-analysis (Santini et al., 2014[Santini, C., Pellei, M., Gandin, V., Porchia, M., Tisato, F. & Marzano, C. (2014). Chem. Rev. 114, 815-862.]). It has emerged, for instance, that the complex should have a good balance between lability and stability and that four- or fivefold coordination geometries were apparently advantageous over sixfold coordination. In view of this, when respective biological investigations were to be addressed, a complex formulation was targeted in one of our labs with a neutral tridentate chelate ligand for some stabilization, while the charge of the copper(II) center was to be neutralized with one or two monodentate ligands that would be more labile and easier to replace in course of the potential inter­action with a biomolecule. Considering that biological copper is quite often coordinated to histidine, i.e. via one nitro­gen of the imidazole substituent, an N-donor-rich ligand was chosen. Consequently, N1,N1-dimethyl-N2-(pyridin-2-ylmeth­yl)ethane-1,2-di­amine (denoted N^N^N) was reacted with CuCl2 to form the precursor complex with chloride coordination resulting, by chance, in a crystal comprising three differently coordinated copper(II) centers, [Cu(N^N^N)(H2O)Cl][Cu(N^N^N)Cl2][CuCl4] (1). Despite the product of the first reaction apparently being a mixture of species, it was further reacted with ammonium thio­cyanate to yield the known targeted complex [Cu(N^N^N)(NCS)2] (2) (Zhang et al., 2009[Zhang, X., Bian, H., Gu, W., Xu, J., Yan, S. & Liang, H. (2009). J. Chem. Res. pp., 274-276.]).

[Scheme 1]

2. Structural commentary

The structure of [Cu(N^N^N)(H2O)Cl][Cu(N^N^N)Cl2][CuCl4] (Fig. 1[link]) consists of three complexes with copper(II) centers, two of which form an adduct mediated by a chloride ligand (Cl2). [CuCl4] has a strongly distorted terahedral coordination geometry around Cu3 with angles ranging from 96.86 (7) to 133.54 (8)° (Table 1[link]). The geometries around Cu1 and Cu2 are best described as distorted square pyramidal with geometry indices of 0.21 and 0.24, respectively (Addison et al., 1984[Addison, A. W., Rao, T. N., Reedijk, J., van Rijn, J. & Verschoor, G. C. (1984). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 1349-1356.]) if Cl2 was considered an actual ligand to Cu1. Cu1 is bridged by Cl2 to Cu3. For Cu3 this is a slightly elongated Cu—Cl bond compared to the other three (Table 1[link]). For Cu1 this bond is rather extended at 2.730 (2) Å, which is substanti­ally longer than the sum of covalent radii (2.34 Å; Cordero et al., 2008[Cordero, B., Gómez, V., Platero-Prats, A. E., Revés, M., Echeverría, J., Cremades, E., Barragán, F. & Alvarez, S. (2008). Dalton Trans. pp. 2832-2838.]), yet shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii (3.14 Å; Bondi, 1964[Bondi, A. (1964). J. Phys. Chem. 68, 441-451.]). This contact can therefore be considered a relatively strong coinage (Halldin et al., 2018[Halldin Stenlid, J., Johansson, A. J. & Brinck, T. (2018). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 2676-2692.]) or regium bond (Roy et al., 2024[Roy, S., Halder, B., Gomila, R. M., Frontera, A., Drew, M. G. B. & Chattopadhyay, S. (2024). Inorg. Chim. Acta 573, 122323.]), terms which are used synonymously and describe the non-covalent inter­action of regions of reduced electron density on the metal center with a nucleophile (e.g. a chloride free electron pair). For coinage metals such a hole is typically located perpendicular to the σ-bond skeleton and consequently named a π-hole. All this matches the situation around Cu1 very well considering that the contact lies in the apical position of the square-pyramidal geometry, if this contact is to be considered an actual coordination. Therefore, the assembly of the Cu1 and Cu3 copper centers are best described as adduct rather than as a dinuclear complex. Within the asymmetric unit, three further C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds are present, which link all three complexes (Fig. 2[link]; Table 2[link]). A Mogul (Bruno et al., 2004[Bruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Kessler, M., Luo, J., Motherwell, W. D. S., Purkis, L. H., Smith, B. R., Taylor, R., Cooper, R. I., Harris, S. E. & Orpen, A. G. (2004). J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44, 2133-2144.]) analysis reveals that there are no unusual metrical parameters in the structure of 1 whatsoever. All values lie well within the observed ranges of related mol­ecular structures deposited in the CSD.

Table 1
Selected geometric parameters (Å, °) for 1[link]

Cu1—Cl1 2.2331 (18) Cu3—Cl4 2.235 (2)
Cu1—Cl2 2.730 (2) Cu3—Cl6 2.238 (2)
Cu2—Cl3 2.258 (2) Cu3—Cl5 2.269 (2)
Cl2—Cu3 2.251 (2)    
       
Cl4—Cu3—Cl6 100.74 (8) Cl4—Cu3—Cl5 129.93 (8)
Cl4—Cu3—Cl2 101.80 (8) Cl6—Cu3—Cl5 98.92 (8)
Cl6—Cu3—Cl2 133.54 (8) Cl2—Cu3—Cl5 96.86 (7)

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for 1[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C6—H6B⋯Cl3 0.99 2.80 3.578 (8) 136
C9—H9B⋯Cl4 0.98 2.94 3.827 (8) 152
C10—H10B⋯Cl3 0.98 2.85 3.759 (8) 155
N2—H2N⋯Cl2 0.91 (9) 2.81 (9) 3.430 (6) 127 (6)
N2—H2N⋯Cl5 0.91 (9) 2.39 (8) 3.223 (6) 153 (7)
N5—H5N⋯Cl5i 0.76 (9) 2.62 (9) 3.352 (7) 161 (8)
C17—H17B⋯Cl4ii 0.99 2.78 3.755 (8) 168
O1—H1O⋯Cl5i 0.96 (1) 2.70 (6) 3.358 (6) 127 (5)
O1—H1O⋯Cl6i 0.96 (1) 2.52 (5) 3.295 (6) 138 (6)
O1—H1P⋯Cl1 0.96 (1) 2.37 (7) 3.175 (6) 141 (8)
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The mol­ecular structure of 1. Ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
The C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonding within the asymmetric unit of 1.

The structure of [Cu(N^N^N)(NCS)2]·0.3H2O (Fig. 3[link]) is already known, albeit with a slightly different amount of water (refcode VUJGUD; Zhang et al., 2009[Zhang, X., Bian, H., Gu, W., Xu, J., Yan, S. & Liang, H. (2009). J. Chem. Res. pp., 274-276.]). Despite having essentially the same R-values as in the published structure, we decided to include our data here for two reasons. Firstly, in the previous study, Zhang and coworkers point out that the two independently refined mol­ecules are two enanti­omers that are co-crystallized, which is based on the distinct conformations of the central amine nitro­gen atoms. A mol­ecular overlay with Mercury (Macrae et al., 2020[Macrae, C. F., Sovago, I., Cottrell, S. J., Galek, P. T. A., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Platings, M., Shields, G. P., Stevens, J. S., Towler, M. & Wood, P. A. (2020). J. Appl. Cryst. 53, 226-235.]) allowing inversion results in essentially the same relative locations of all atoms and an r.m.s.d. of 0.4566. In the structure reported here, the two mol­ecules appear slightly less similar to each other. Their overlay results in an r.m.s.d. of 0.7224, which suggests that the mol­ecules have a bit of inherent flexibility. Secondly, and more importantly, the available report is not covering inter­esting features of the packing pattern or inter­mol­ecular inter­actions, as will be discussed in the next section. The compound crystallizes with two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit and bears a site that is occupied by a fraction of water. The occupancy was established by applying SQUEEZE (Spek, 2015[Spek, A. L. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 9-18.]) which resulted in ca. 49 electrons per unit cell and a total void size of 200 Å3 (or ca. six electrons each in eight void sizes of roughly 25 Å3). Despite running SQUEEZE, the solvent was not removed from the refinement. Instead, the water oxygen atom was refined with a fixed 0.6 occupancy, which amounts to a 20% increase compared to the known structure. The geometry indices are 0.0 for both complex mol­ecules, supporting square-pyramidal geometries. Despite these very low values there are of course some distortions from ideal sqp geometry. The two mol­ecules of the asymmetric unit are connected by a hydrogen bond, which will be discussed in the following section. With regard to the individual metrical parameters in this mol­ecular structure, the Mogul analysis revealed that none of these were unusual or uncommon. Some features are already discussed in the original publication (Zhang et al., 2009[Zhang, X., Bian, H., Gu, W., Xu, J., Yan, S. & Liang, H. (2009). J. Chem. Res. pp., 274-276.]) and we abstain from a more detailed analysis here.

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
The mol­ecular structure of 2. The partial water oxygen atom is omitted for clarity. Ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level.

3. Supra­molecular features

Because in both structures there is a large or even very large number of non-classical hydrogen bonds originating from C—H moieties, which face in various directions without clear patterns and some of these are in addition rather long, the following discussion of hydrogen bonds will be focusing on the classical ones and only include some more noteworthy non-classical ones where appropriate (Tables 2[link] and 3[link]). For data on all hydrogen-bonding contacts, please refer to the Supplementary material.

Table 3
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for 2[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N2—H2N⋯S3 0.91 (7) 2.68 (7) 3.546 (7) 161 (9)
N7—H7N⋯S2i 0.91 (6) 2.83 (7) 3.623 (7) 146 (6)
Symmetry code: (i) Mathematical equation.

In the crystal of [Cu(N^N^N)(H2O)Cl][Cu(N^N^N)Cl2][CuCl4], hydrogen bonding involving the coordinated water has a particularly important role for the packing. It connects [Cu(N^N^N)(H2O)Cl] to both [Cu(N^N^N)Cl2] and [CuCl4], forming infinite chains that protrude parallel to the ac diagonal throughout the crystal (Fig. 4[link]). One hydrogen (H1O) is in contact with two chloride atoms of [CuCl4] (Cl5 and Cl6; symmetry code: x − Mathematical equation, −y + Mathematical equation, z − Mathematical equation) in a bifurcated hydrogen bond and the other (H1P) establishes a simple link to [Cu(N^N^N)Cl] (Cl1, within the asymmetric unit). The hydrogen bonds involving N—H merely support the formation of these chains. N2 of [Cu(N^N^N)Cl] forms a bifurcated hydrogen bond to two chlorides, one of which is intra­molecular (Cl2) and the other is inter­molecular (Cl5) to [CuCl4] if the two linked centers are considered an adduct. Both hydrogen bonds occur within the asymmetric unit. Additionally, the hydrogen bond originating from N5 of [Cu(N^N^N)(H2O)Cl] connects this complex to [CuCl4], again involving Cl5, which is thereby the acceptor of three hydrogen bonds. All classical hydrogen bonds are relevant only within one chain but not between chains. There are two further C—H⋯π contacts. One occurs within the asymmetric unit between the pyridine aromatic C11—H11 of the Cu2-centered complex and the pyridine ring of the Cu1 centered complex with a H⋯Cg distance of 2.98 Å (Cg is the centroid of the pyridine π-ring) and a C—H⋯Cg angle of 139°. The second such inter­action links the Cu2-centered complex to the adjacent Cu2-centered complex via H19C (symmetry operator: x, 1 + y, z) with a H⋯Cg distance of 2.91 Å and a C—H⋯Cg angle of 118°. In combination they form unsymmetric ribbons protruding along the crystallographic b-axis direction (Fig. 5[link]). Non-classical hydrogen bonds further consolidate the crystal packing (Table 2[link]). Together with the hydrogen bond C6—H6B⋯Cl3 of the asymmetric unit mentioned already in the Structural commentary the C17—H17B⋯Cl4 contact extending from the asymmetric unit forms infinite chains, which run parallel to the [2Mathematical equation4] unit-cell direction normal (closest Miller vector: [4Mathematical equation6]; Fig. 6[link]). In combination with the chains formed by the classical hydrogen bonds, this gives a layer structure with the nearest Miller plane (Mathematical equation55) (Fig. 7[link]). Other non-covalent inter­molecular inter­actions between the layers are exclusively C—H-based, non-classical hydrogen bonds. If this type of contact is expanded, it does so in all directions and further clear patterns cannot be distinguished.

[Figure 4]
Figure 4
The chain of complex mol­ecules arising from the hydrogen-bonding inter­actions of the water mol­ecule in the crystal of 1, which protrudes parallel to the ac-diagonal viewed along the crystallographic b-axis. The copper centers of the asymmetric unit are labeled.
[Figure 5]
Figure 5
The two C—H⋯π contacts in the structure of 1 of which one connects the Cu1-centered and the Cu2-centered complexes and the other the Cu2-centered complexes with both their adjacent Cu2-centered complexes. The two contacts thereby form unsymmetric ribbons protruding along the crystallographic b-axis direction. The respective copper centers of the asymmetric unit are labeled.
[Figure 6]
Figure 6
The alternating C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds in the structure of 1, which involve H6B/Cl3 and H17B/Cl4 and form indefinite chains parallel to the [2Mathematical equation4] unit-cell direction. The copper centers of the asymmetric unit are labeled.
[Figure 7]
Figure 7
A view of the layer structure consisting of chains formed exclusively by the classical hydrogen bonds (Fig. 4[link]) and non-classical C—H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds (Fig. 6[link]) in the crystal of 1 viewed along the Miller vector [Mathematical equation55].

The packing of [Cu(N^N^N)(NCS)2]·0.3H2O is also largely dominated by inter­molecular hydrogen bonding (Table 3[link]). The two mol­ecules of the asymmetric unit are linked by the N2—H2N⋯S3 hydrogen bond, thus forming a hydrogen-bonded dimer. The dimers are further connected to adjacent dimers by the analogous hydrogen bond N7—H7N⋯S2 (symmetry code: x, y + 1, z), which leads to ribbons with a zigzag pattern protruding along the crystallographic b-axis direction. The formation of these ribbons appears to be supported by contacts between the terminal thio­cyanate sulfur and a thio­cyanate nitro­gen atom of an adjacent mol­ecule, which at least mirror, but more likely co-define the zigzag motif (Fig. 8[link]). The respective contact distances are 3.364 (7) Å for S2⋯N9 (symmetry code: x, y − 1, z), and 3.243 (6) Å for S3⋯N4 (within the asymmetric unit). The C=S⋯N angles are notably distinct for these inter­actions at 138.6° for the former and 161.93° for the latter. Such a contact can be considered as a weak chalcogen bond, which is defined as the inter­action of an electropositive region, i.e. a hole in the electron density, on a chalcogen atom with a nucleophile and atom-to-atom distances which are longer than the sum of covalent radii and shorter than the sum of van der Waals radii (Aakeroy et al., 2019[Aakeroy, C. B., Bryce, D. L., Desiraju, G. R., Frontera, A., Legon, A. C., Nicotra, F., Rissanen, K., Scheiner, S., Terraneo, G., Metrangolo, P. & Resnati, G. (2019). Pure Appl. Chem. 91, 1889-1892.]; Mahmudov et al., 2022[Mahmudov, K. T., Gurbanov, A. V., Aliyeva, V. A., Guedes da Silva, M. F. C., Resnati, G. & Pombeiro, A. J. L. (2022). Coord. Chem. Rev. 464, 214556.]). An alternative description would be with reversed polarization as a pnictogen bond (Bauzá et al., 2015[Bauzá, A., Mooibroek, T. J. & Frontera, A. (2015). ChemPhysChem 16, 2496-2517.]; Mahmudov et al., 2020[Mahmudov, K. T., Gurbanov, A. V., Aliyeva, V. A., Resnati, G. & Pombeiro, A. J. L. (2020). Coord. Chem. Rev. 418, 213381.]) in which the nitro­gen is the bond donor bearing a hole (π in this case) and the nucleophilic sulfur atom adopts the role of the bond acceptor. A hole is specified as a σ-hole if it resides on the opposite side of the chalcogen/pnictogen relative to a covalent bond and as a π-hole if it resides in a location which would render the chalcogen/pnictogen bond perpendicular to the covalent bond. For coordinated N-donor thio­cyanate ligands, the formation of chalcogen bonding was described before (refcode VAYGEU; Ghorai et al., 2018[Ghorai, P., Brandão, P., Bauzá, A., Frontera, A. & Saha, A. (2018). Inorg. Chim. Acta 469, 189-196.]) and the 158.63° C=S⋯A angle in the known structure is similar to the one observed here for the two mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit with 161.93°. This value is sufficiently close to the expected 180° for a chalcogen bond with the hole residing on the sulfur atom opposite to the double bond and in between the two lone pairs. The second contact between the sulfur and the nitro­gen of the thio­cyanate ligands extending out of the asymmetric unit has a more acute angle of 138.61°. This would be more in accordance with the ideal 120° angle in the case of an inter­action of a lone pair of sulfur residing in an sp2-hybridized orbital and a π-hole on the nitro­gen. Therefore it is likely that both types of inter­molecular inter­actions are observed in this structure linking atoms of the same types and chemical environments but with non-covalent bonds of distinct character. The observed ribbons are consequently consolidated by a mixture of inter­molecular inter­actions (hydrogen, chalcogen and pnictogen bonds).

[Figure 8]
Figure 8
The ribbons in the crystal of 2, which protrude parallel to the crystallographic b-axis viewed along the crystallographic c-axis. The copper centers of the asymmetric unit are labelled. The N—H⋯S hydrogen bonds are shown as thin blue dashed lines and the C= S⋯N chalcogen/pnictogen bonds are shown as thick blue dashed lines. Based on the observed respective angles, the non-covalent contact pointing from the Cu2-centered complex to the nitro­gen on the Cu1-centered complex is more likely a chalcogen bond, and the one pointing from the Cu1-centered complex to the nitro­gen of the Cu2-centered complex is more likely a pnictogen bond. The partial water oxygen atom is not shown.

Two adjacent ribbons in the c-axis direction face each other with the pyridine rings of one ribbon extended toward the other, which is related by inversion symmetry. The resulting off-set ππ-stacking appears as a zipper, which holds the two adjacent ribbons together (Fig. 9[link]). The centroid–centroid distance for the contact from the Cu1 complex to the Cu2 complex is 3.800 (1) Å, the angle between the planes of the aromatic rings is 9°, and the slippage is 1.654 Å. For the contact from the Cu2 complex to the Cu1 complex these parameters are identical except for the slippage, which is slightly shorter at 1.261 Å. The ribbons are further connected by various C—H⋯A contacts, which, apart from the direction of the crystallographic b-axis, extend the network in directions x, −y + 1, z + Mathematical equation and −x + Mathematical equation, y + Mathematical equation, −z + Mathematical equation.

[Figure 9]
Figure 9
The unit-cell content of 2 including classical N—H⋯S hydrogen bonds and the C=S⋯N chalcogen/pnictogen bonds viewed along the crystallographic b-axis. Since b is rather short, there is only a single ac-layer of mol­ecules in the unit cell. The ribbons, which protrude parallel to the b-axis, are represented by two complex mol­ecules each, which are connected by hydrogen bonding. The ribbons are further connected by ππ-stacking to one adjacent ribbon each so that the unit cell holds four pairs of ribbon links. The copper centers of the asymmetric unit are labeled.

4. Database survey

A search of the CSD database version 2025.1 (Groom et al., 2016[Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171-179.]) with ConQuest (Bruno et al., 2002[Bruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Edgington, P. R., Kessler, M., Macrae, C. F., McCabe, P., Pearson, J. & Taylor, R. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 389-397.]) for the exact neutral ligand used in the two complexes of this study resulted in 19 hits for complex structures with this ligand employing various metals. Restricting the search to only copper complexes returned nine hits with one mol­ecule appearing thrice, i.e. seven different mol­ecules. One of these is the same structure as reported here with essentially identical features (see Structural commentary above), apart from the actual occupancy of the co-crystallized water mol­ecule, which, to a certain extent, is a matter of inter­pretation (refcode VUJGUD; Zhang et al., 2009[Zhang, X., Bian, H., Gu, W., Xu, J., Yan, S. & Liang, H. (2009). J. Chem. Res. pp., 274-276.]). The ligand adopts, with the exception of the direction of the pyramidalization of the central amine nitro­gen atom, in principle the same coordination geometry throughout all examples. In all cases the copper centers are in oxidation state (II) and in distorted geometries, which resemble rather a square-pyramidal than a trigonal–bipyramidal arrangement. As complementing ligands there were found a combination of perchlorate and water (BIJQUI; Kumar et al., 2013[Kumar, P., Kalita, A. & Mondal, B. (2013). Inorg. Chim. Acta 404, 88-96.]), perchlorate and azide (FIFZOK; Sarkar et al., 2005[Sarkar, S., Mondal, A., Ribas, J., Drew, M. G. B., Pramanik, K. & Rajak, K. K. (2005). Inorg. Chim. Acta 358, 641-649.]), two chlorides (FIXLOR, Orton et al., 2023[Orton, J. B., Thiam, I. E. & Coles, S. J. (2023). CSD communication (refcode FIXLOR). CCDC, Cambridge, England. https://dx.doi.org/10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2h94yx]; MATROP, Raja et al., 2005[Raja, A., Rajendiran, V., Uma Maheswari, P., Balamurugan, R., Kilner, C. A., Halcrow, M. A. & Palaniandavar, M. (2005). J. Inorg. Biochem. 99, 1717-1732.]; MATROP01, Madhu, 2022[Madhu, V. (2022). CSD communication (refcode MATROP01). CCDC, Cambridge, England. https://dx.doi.org/10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc29c9ss]; essentially all the exact same structure despite the different refcodes), two bromides (XEHSOW; Nagarasu et al., 2022[Nagarasu, P., Gayathri, P., Sri, S. N., Saisubramanian, N., Dhanaraj, P., Moon, D., Anthony, S. P. & Madhu, V. (2022). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 139, 109316.]), terephthalic acid forming coordination polymers (WACMAP; Bian et al., 2003[Bian, H.-D., Xu, J.-Y., Gu, W., Yan, S.-P., Liao, D.-Z., Jiang, Z.-H. & Cheng, P. (2003). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 6, 573-576.]), and finally thio­cyanate as a bridging S,N donor ligand resulting in a dinuclear complex in which each copper center is bound by one N of one SCN and one S of the other (VUJHAK; Zhang et al., 2009[Zhang, X., Bian, H., Gu, W., Xu, J., Yan, S. & Liang, H. (2009). J. Chem. Res. pp., 274-276.]).

The CSD was further searched for crystal structures of copper complexes with thio­cyanate and any other ligand(s) in which the inter­molecular S⋯N distances lie within the range of 3.0–3.4 Å and may be inter­preted as a weak chalcogen or pnictogen bond, similar to what was observed here for 2. The distance range was chosen so that it remains shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii of sulfur and nitro­gen of 3.5 Å (Bondi, 1964[Bondi, A. (1964). J. Phys. Chem. 68, 441-451.]) and substanti­ally longer than the sum of the covalent radii for a single bond of 1.76 Å (Blom & Haaland, 1985[Blom, R. & Haaland, A. (1985). J. Mol. Struct. 128, 21-27.]; Cordero et al., 2008[Cordero, B., Gómez, V., Platero-Prats, A. E., Revés, M., Echeverría, J., Cremades, E., Barragán, F. & Alvarez, S. (2008). Dalton Trans. pp. 2832-2838.]). This returned ten hits (89 if the coordinated metal was unspecified). The observed inter­molecular S⋯N distances range from 3.07 Å (YESZOM; de Geest et al., 2007[de Geest, D. J., Noble, A., Moubaraki, B., Murray, K. S., Larsen, D. S. & Brooker, S. (2007). Dalton Trans. pp. 467-475.]) to 3.39 (VUJGUD, Zhang et al., 2009[Zhang, X., Bian, H., Gu, W., Xu, J., Yan, S. & Liang, H. (2009). J. Chem. Res. pp., 274-276.]; QANDIT, Paşaoğlu et al., 2005[Paşaoğlu, H., Karadağ, A., Tezcan, F. & Büyükgüngör, O. (2005). Acta Cryst. C61, m93-m94.]). The other structures with inter­molecular distances falling into this range are QANDIT01 (Moncol, 2020[Moncol, J. (2020). CSD communication (refcode QANDIT01). CCDC, Cambridge, England. https://dx.doi.org/10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc25h35z]), ABOWEW (Handy et al., 2017[Handy, J. V., Ayala, G. & Pike, R. D. (2017). Inorg. Chim. Acta 456, 64-75.]), DEXSAB (Li et al., 2007[Li, W.-H., Chen, H.-N., Li, G.-H. & Liu, F.-Q. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, m519-m520.]), HAGSEQ and HAGSEQ01 (Laussmann et al., 2015[Laussmann, T., Grzesiak, I., Krest, A., Stirnat, K., Meier-Giebing, S., Ruschewitz, U. & Klein, A. (2015). Drug Test. Anal. 7, 56-64.]), IZUNOI (Świtlicka et al., 2016[Świtlicka, A., Czerwińska, K., Machura, B., Penkala, M., Bieńko, A., Bieńko, D. & Zierkiewicz, W. (2016). CrystEngComm 18, 9042-9055.]) and OKUMAI (Shen et al., 2003[Shen, W.-Z., Xie, C.-Z., Cheng, P., Chen, J.-T., Yan, S.-P., Liao, D.-Z. & Jiang, Z.-H. (2003). J. Chem. Res. 2003, 307-309.]). The terminal sulfide is in all cases pointing to the side of the nitro­gen of a second thio­cyanate (i.e. the respective S⋯N=C moieties are not arranged in line). The C=S⋯N angle, however, appears to have a bit more flexibility which would be in accordance with the observation that apparently such contact can be a chalcogen bond or a pnictogen bond. Presumably both options are generally possible, a terminal σ-hole on sulfur or a π-hole on nitro­gen as the respective bond donor. Considering the relative uniformity of the observed inter­actions, we have reason to speculate that they do indeed play a relevant role for the assembly of the respective crystals.

5. Synthesis and crystallization

The ligand N1,N1-dimethyl-N2-(pyridin-2-ylmeth­yl)ethane-1,2-di­amine was obtained from a reaction of N,N′-di­methyl­ethylenedi­amine (1.32 g, 15 mmol) with pyridine-2-carbaldehyde (1.61 g, 15 mmol) in 30 mL methanol followed by reduction of the inter­mediate Schiff base. Sodium tetra­hydridoborate (0.76 g, 20 mmol) was added to the solution and the mixture was stirred for 3 h under argon. The solution was quenched with 100 ml of 2 M NaOH. The mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 and the solvent removed in vacuo to give the product as a pale-yellow oil. 1H NMR (300MHz, CDCl3) δppm: 8.55 (d, J = 4.98 Hz, 1 H), 7.64 (td, J = 7.66, 1.74 Hz, 1 H), 7.34 (d, J = 7.76, 1 H), 7.15 (dd, J = 7.43, 4.95 Hz, 1 H), 3.94 (s, 2 H), 2.74 (t, J = 6.37 Hz, 2 H), 2.67 (br.s, 1 H), 2.48 (t, J = 6.17 Hz, 2 H), 2.46 (t, J = 6.19 Hz, 11 H), 2.22 (s, 6 H).

The blue compound 1 was synthesized by the reaction of the oily ligand product (0.36 g, 2 mmol) and 0.34 g (2 mmol) of copper(II)chloride dihydrate in 10 mL of a mixture of methanol and water (50:50).

The green compound 2 was formed by the reaction of 1 (1.41 g, 2 mmol) with ammonium thio­cyanate (0.3 g, 4 mmol) in 10 mL methanol (non-dried).

Crystals of the complexes were obtained in both cases directly from the mother liquor solutions.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 4[link]. For data solution and refinement the WinGX GUI was used (Farrugia, 2012[Farrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849-854.]).

Table 4
Experimental details

  1 2
Crystal data
Chemical formula [CuCl(C10H17N3)(H2O)][CuCl(C10H17N3)][CuCl4] C12H17CuN5S2·0.3(H2O)
Mr 779.87 363.76
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, Cc Monoclinic, C2/c
Temperature (K) 170 170
a, b, c (Å) 29.037 (6), 7.4356 (15), 17.706 (4) 27.626 (6), 7.2787 (15), 32.105 (6)
β (°) 127.34 (3) 97.41 (3)
V3) 3039.4 (14) 6402 (2)
Z 4 16
Radiation type Mo Kα Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 2.63 1.63
Crystal size (mm) 0.04 × 0.04 × 0.03 0.02 × 0.02 × 0.01
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Stoe IPDS2T Stoe IPDS2T
Absorption correction Numerical [face indexed (X-RED32 and X-SHAPE; Stoe & Cie, 2016[Stoe & Cie (2016). X-AREA. Stoe & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany.])] Numerical [face indexed (X-RED32 and X-SHAPE; Stoe & Cie, 2016[Stoe & Cie (2016). X-AREA. Stoe & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany.])]
Tmin, Tmax 0.993, 0.997 0.843, 0.966
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 15217, 6832, 5729 22311, 5642, 3563
Rint 0.067 0.094
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.667 0.595
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.039, 0.102, 1.07 0.062, 0.170, 1.04
No. of reflections 6832 5642
No. of parameters 345 378
No. of restraints 5 1
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 1.07, −1.24 2.09, −0.70
Absolute structure Flack x determined using 2193 quotients [(I+)−(I)]/[(I+)+(I)] (Parsons et al., 2013[Parsons, S., Flack, H. D. & Wagner, T. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 249-259.])
Absolute structure parameter −0.024 (15)
Computer programs: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2016[Stoe & Cie (2016). X-AREA. Stoe & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany.]), SHELXT2018/2 (Sheldrick, 2015a[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3-8.]), SHELXL2019/2 (Sheldrick, 2015b[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3-8.]), XP (Sheldrick, 2008[Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112-122.]), CIFTAB (Sheldrick, 2015b[Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3-8.]) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010[Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920-925.]).

All carbon-bound hydrogen atoms were included using a riding model starting from calculated positions (Carom—H 0.95 Å; Cmeth­ylene—H 0.99 Å; Cmeth­yl—H 0.98 Å) with isotropic Uiso(H) values fixed to 1.2 × Ueq for aromatic and methyl­ene H and to 1.5 × Ueq for methyl H of the respective parent carbon atom.

In the structure of 1 the N-bound hydrogen atoms were found and refined completely freely. The water hydrogen atoms were located and the O—H and H to H distances were restrained using DFIX with very small allowed deviations so that they could rotate freely but not elongate or shorten their respective distances. The water mol­ecule was therefore refined in a way to find its orientation without force and the respective hydrogen atom locations and their engagement in hydrogen bonding are, hence, defined by the data and factual. The displacement parameters of the water hydrogen atoms were refined freely. Three reflexes were omitted as clear outliers.

In the structure of 2 the N-bound hydrogen atoms were found and constrained with SADI for the N—H distances at a harshened deviation limit of 0.02. With regard to relative orientation and displacement parameters they were refined freely. The water oxygen atom was refined with a fixed occupancy of 0.6, which had been established using SQUEEZE in PLATON (Spek, 2015[Spek, A. L. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 9-18.]). With regard to the water hydrogen atoms, they could not be refined in an appropriate strategy based on data. The reason is most plausibly that for the water mol­ecule there are various options for engagement in hydrogen bonding both as donor and as acceptor. For geometric reasons, all these potential hydrogen bonds cannot be served concomitantly. There are, hence, distinct probable orientations of the hydrogen atoms in the crystal lattice and merely fractions of hydrogen occupancies in individual locations of an already not fully occupied water mol­ecule. It was therefore decided to completely abstain from refining the water hydrogen atoms. One reflex was omitted as clear outlier.

Supporting information


Computing details top

Aquachlorido[N1,N1-dimethyl-N2-(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine-κ3N,N',N'']copper(II) chlorido[N1,N1-dimethyl-N2-(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine-κ3N,N',N'']copper(II) tetrachloridocuprate(II) (1) top
Crystal data top
[CuCl(C10H17N3)(H2O)][CuCl(C10H17N3)][CuCl4]F(000) = 1580
Mr = 779.87Dx = 1.704 Mg m3
Monoclinic, CcMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 29.037 (6) ÅCell parameters from 17421 reflections
b = 7.4356 (15) Åθ = 4.6–59.0°
c = 17.706 (4) ŵ = 2.63 mm1
β = 127.34 (3)°T = 170 K
V = 3039.4 (14) Å3Block, green
Z = 40.04 × 0.04 × 0.03 mm
Data collection top
Stoe IPDS2T
diffractometer
6832 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube5729 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 6.67 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.067
ω scansθmax = 28.3°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: numerical
[face indexed (X-Red32 and X-Shape; Stoe & Cie, 2016)]
h = 3738
Tmin = 0.993, Tmax = 0.997k = 98
15217 measured reflectionsl = 2323
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.039H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.102 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.056P)2 + 2.5975P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.07(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
6832 reflectionsΔρmax = 1.07 e Å3
345 parametersΔρmin = 1.24 e Å3
5 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 2193 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Primary atom site location: dualAbsolute structure parameter: 0.024 (15)
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cu10.52445 (3)0.28776 (9)0.56363 (5)0.02028 (17)
Cl10.45702 (7)0.0850 (2)0.52703 (12)0.0296 (3)
N10.5411 (2)0.1896 (7)0.4765 (4)0.0211 (11)
N20.5803 (3)0.4768 (8)0.5836 (4)0.0251 (12)
N30.5080 (3)0.4623 (7)0.6347 (4)0.0232 (12)
C10.5275 (4)0.0235 (9)0.4389 (5)0.0300 (15)
H10.5052750.0529140.4485280.036*
C20.5452 (4)0.0387 (11)0.3866 (6)0.0395 (18)
H20.5353280.1565910.3605430.047*
C30.5774 (4)0.0729 (11)0.3727 (5)0.0368 (17)
H30.5904270.0324820.3377140.044*
C40.5903 (3)0.2430 (10)0.4101 (5)0.0299 (15)
H40.6115100.3232310.3999530.036*
C50.5719 (3)0.2965 (9)0.4628 (4)0.0232 (13)
C60.5832 (3)0.4841 (9)0.5040 (5)0.0267 (14)
H6A0.6218680.5263040.5262210.032*
H6B0.5536950.5687670.4550710.032*
C70.5671 (4)0.6477 (9)0.6083 (5)0.0318 (16)
H7A0.5333460.7064660.5506130.038*
H7B0.6006620.7301750.6387090.038*
C80.5537 (3)0.6023 (10)0.6765 (5)0.0304 (15)
H8A0.5891820.5581630.7371200.036*
H8B0.5404110.7116770.6900500.036*
C90.5080 (3)0.3810 (11)0.7102 (5)0.0348 (17)
H9A0.5016330.4746230.7418540.052*
H9B0.5454370.3226260.7565670.052*
H9C0.4770050.2913140.6825400.052*
C100.4502 (3)0.5435 (11)0.5627 (5)0.0359 (17)
H10A0.4203300.4503980.5369030.054*
H10B0.4495480.5956350.5112160.054*
H10C0.4427330.6378780.5926140.054*
H2N0.612 (4)0.418 (12)0.633 (6)0.03 (2)*
Cu20.34119 (3)0.47935 (10)0.24530 (5)0.02378 (18)
Cl20.61184 (7)0.0955 (2)0.71592 (11)0.0293 (4)
N40.3545 (2)0.2858 (8)0.1810 (4)0.0249 (12)
N50.2588 (3)0.3913 (9)0.1528 (4)0.0287 (13)
N60.3047 (2)0.6948 (8)0.2609 (4)0.0253 (12)
H5N0.254 (4)0.313 (12)0.175 (6)0.03 (2)*
Cu30.69403 (4)0.22804 (11)0.83746 (6)0.0290 (2)
Cl30.43254 (7)0.5878 (3)0.33488 (13)0.0346 (4)
Cl40.66761 (8)0.3341 (3)0.92412 (13)0.0346 (4)
Cl50.71396 (8)0.3773 (2)0.74857 (13)0.0343 (4)
Cl60.78297 (8)0.1256 (3)0.95194 (13)0.0388 (4)
C110.4059 (3)0.2167 (9)0.2117 (5)0.0289 (15)
H110.4400200.2593830.2696820.035*
C120.4106 (3)0.0876 (10)0.1623 (6)0.0323 (15)
H120.4475450.0411810.1856820.039*
C130.3610 (3)0.0241 (10)0.0773 (6)0.0358 (17)
H130.3633420.0635980.0407380.043*
C140.3083 (3)0.0919 (11)0.0476 (5)0.0328 (16)
H140.2734490.0477550.0088450.039*
C150.3062 (3)0.2232 (9)0.0998 (5)0.0261 (14)
C160.2508 (3)0.3049 (10)0.0711 (5)0.0311 (15)
H16A0.2374180.3951280.0205740.037*
H16B0.2207480.2103630.0452470.037*
C170.2179 (3)0.5335 (9)0.1314 (5)0.0301 (15)
H17A0.1803690.4810100.1099680.036*
H17B0.2110550.6124270.0805270.036*
C180.2443 (3)0.6393 (10)0.2217 (5)0.0312 (15)
H18A0.2205220.7473710.2083360.037*
H18B0.2452040.5648130.2688650.037*
C190.3032 (4)0.8410 (10)0.2020 (6)0.0363 (17)
H19A0.2855270.9486900.2064910.054*
H19B0.2802870.8017850.1355790.054*
H19C0.3427540.8687280.2250190.054*
C200.3336 (3)0.7609 (10)0.3584 (5)0.0345 (17)
H20A0.3723730.8051400.3839050.052*
H20B0.3369990.6626350.3983200.052*
H20C0.3108580.8589220.3577290.052*
O10.3472 (2)0.2913 (7)0.3534 (4)0.0363 (12)
H1O0.323 (2)0.252 (10)0.369 (5)0.05 (3)*
H1P0.377 (3)0.201 (8)0.379 (7)0.08 (4)*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.0227 (4)0.0200 (3)0.0221 (4)0.0026 (3)0.0156 (3)0.0020 (3)
Cl10.0249 (8)0.0308 (8)0.0347 (9)0.0063 (6)0.0190 (7)0.0009 (7)
N10.026 (3)0.021 (3)0.021 (3)0.004 (2)0.016 (2)0.003 (2)
N20.026 (3)0.024 (3)0.024 (3)0.006 (2)0.015 (3)0.003 (2)
N30.030 (3)0.023 (3)0.021 (3)0.004 (2)0.018 (2)0.000 (2)
C10.047 (4)0.020 (3)0.029 (3)0.003 (3)0.026 (3)0.001 (3)
C20.064 (5)0.031 (4)0.033 (4)0.013 (4)0.034 (4)0.006 (3)
C30.049 (5)0.039 (4)0.030 (4)0.015 (3)0.028 (4)0.006 (3)
C40.029 (4)0.041 (4)0.029 (3)0.008 (3)0.023 (3)0.009 (3)
C50.020 (3)0.026 (3)0.021 (3)0.004 (2)0.011 (3)0.006 (2)
C60.032 (4)0.027 (3)0.029 (3)0.006 (3)0.023 (3)0.003 (3)
C70.051 (5)0.015 (3)0.037 (4)0.005 (3)0.031 (4)0.004 (3)
C80.040 (4)0.026 (3)0.025 (3)0.005 (3)0.020 (3)0.006 (3)
C90.041 (4)0.047 (4)0.025 (3)0.002 (3)0.025 (3)0.003 (3)
C100.034 (4)0.042 (4)0.027 (4)0.010 (3)0.016 (3)0.003 (3)
Cu20.0174 (3)0.0258 (4)0.0234 (4)0.0003 (3)0.0100 (3)0.0037 (3)
Cl20.0268 (8)0.0300 (9)0.0259 (8)0.0044 (6)0.0133 (7)0.0005 (6)
N40.024 (3)0.030 (3)0.024 (3)0.001 (2)0.015 (2)0.004 (2)
N50.025 (3)0.028 (3)0.029 (3)0.000 (2)0.014 (3)0.000 (2)
N60.022 (3)0.028 (3)0.024 (3)0.003 (2)0.013 (2)0.001 (2)
Cu30.0284 (4)0.0323 (4)0.0284 (4)0.0041 (4)0.0183 (4)0.0031 (4)
Cl30.0224 (8)0.0420 (10)0.0373 (9)0.0078 (7)0.0170 (8)0.0135 (7)
Cl40.0306 (9)0.0452 (10)0.0303 (9)0.0031 (8)0.0197 (8)0.0026 (8)
Cl50.0297 (8)0.0363 (9)0.0434 (10)0.0016 (7)0.0255 (8)0.0089 (7)
Cl60.0278 (8)0.0448 (10)0.0349 (9)0.0042 (8)0.0144 (8)0.0025 (8)
C110.023 (3)0.028 (4)0.034 (4)0.003 (3)0.016 (3)0.002 (3)
C120.029 (4)0.030 (4)0.041 (4)0.001 (3)0.023 (3)0.002 (3)
C130.042 (4)0.032 (4)0.046 (4)0.008 (3)0.033 (4)0.011 (3)
C140.028 (4)0.042 (4)0.028 (4)0.006 (3)0.017 (3)0.008 (3)
C150.027 (3)0.028 (3)0.024 (3)0.007 (3)0.015 (3)0.007 (3)
C160.024 (3)0.041 (4)0.022 (3)0.001 (3)0.011 (3)0.006 (3)
C170.017 (3)0.031 (3)0.031 (4)0.003 (3)0.009 (3)0.002 (3)
C180.026 (3)0.029 (4)0.038 (4)0.004 (3)0.018 (3)0.000 (3)
C190.041 (4)0.031 (4)0.040 (4)0.005 (3)0.026 (4)0.005 (3)
C200.033 (4)0.033 (4)0.032 (4)0.007 (3)0.017 (3)0.002 (3)
O10.028 (3)0.042 (3)0.038 (3)0.003 (2)0.019 (2)0.013 (2)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—N22.009 (6)Cu2—N62.030 (6)
Cu1—N12.014 (5)Cu2—Cl32.258 (2)
Cu1—N32.054 (5)Cu2—O12.290 (5)
Cu1—Cl12.2331 (18)Cl2—Cu32.251 (2)
Cu1—Cl22.730 (2)N4—C151.343 (9)
N1—C51.324 (9)N4—C111.343 (9)
N1—C11.343 (9)N5—C171.458 (9)
N2—C61.461 (9)N5—C161.467 (9)
N2—C71.469 (9)N6—C201.472 (9)
N3—C91.468 (9)N6—C191.490 (10)
N3—C81.483 (9)N6—C181.499 (9)
N3—C101.487 (9)Cu3—Cl42.235 (2)
C1—C21.384 (11)Cu3—Cl62.238 (2)
C2—C31.378 (12)Cu3—Cl52.269 (2)
C3—C41.370 (11)C11—C121.360 (10)
C4—C51.384 (10)C12—C131.391 (11)
C5—C61.516 (9)C13—C141.377 (11)
C7—C81.515 (10)C14—C151.370 (10)
Cu2—N42.013 (6)C15—C161.492 (10)
Cu2—N52.021 (6)C17—C181.508 (10)
N2—Cu1—N181.1 (2)N5—Cu2—Cl3173.8 (2)
N2—Cu1—N385.0 (2)N6—Cu2—Cl396.36 (17)
N1—Cu1—N3162.0 (2)N4—Cu2—O195.3 (2)
N2—Cu1—Cl1174.60 (18)N5—Cu2—O186.1 (2)
N1—Cu1—Cl196.26 (17)N6—Cu2—O198.6 (2)
N3—Cu1—Cl196.65 (17)Cl3—Cu2—O199.76 (15)
N2—Cu1—Cl291.43 (18)Cu3—Cl2—Cu1121.76 (8)
N1—Cu1—Cl293.18 (16)C15—N4—C11118.9 (6)
N3—Cu1—Cl298.51 (16)C15—N4—Cu2114.8 (5)
Cl1—Cu1—Cl293.40 (7)C11—N4—Cu2126.3 (5)
C5—N1—C1119.3 (6)C17—N5—C16116.5 (6)
C5—N1—Cu1115.2 (4)C17—N5—Cu2110.7 (4)
C1—N1—Cu1125.3 (5)C16—N5—Cu2110.0 (5)
C6—N2—C7115.7 (6)C20—N6—C19109.3 (6)
C6—N2—Cu1111.6 (4)C20—N6—C18108.1 (6)
C7—N2—Cu1109.2 (4)C19—N6—C18110.3 (5)
C9—N3—C8109.2 (5)C20—N6—Cu2116.7 (4)
C9—N3—C10108.9 (6)C19—N6—Cu2106.0 (5)
C8—N3—C10110.2 (6)C18—N6—Cu2106.3 (4)
C9—N3—Cu1115.2 (5)Cl4—Cu3—Cl6100.74 (8)
C8—N3—Cu1106.3 (4)Cl4—Cu3—Cl2101.80 (8)
C10—N3—Cu1107.0 (4)Cl6—Cu3—Cl2133.54 (8)
N1—C1—C2121.4 (7)Cl4—Cu3—Cl5129.93 (8)
C3—C2—C1119.0 (7)Cl6—Cu3—Cl598.92 (8)
C4—C3—C2119.1 (7)Cl2—Cu3—Cl596.86 (7)
C3—C4—C5119.1 (7)N4—C11—C12122.0 (7)
N1—C5—C4122.0 (6)C11—C12—C13119.6 (7)
N1—C5—C6115.9 (6)C14—C13—C12118.1 (7)
C4—C5—C6122.0 (6)C15—C14—C13119.7 (7)
N2—C6—C5108.0 (5)N4—C15—C14121.7 (6)
N2—C7—C8106.6 (6)N4—C15—C16115.7 (6)
N3—C8—C7110.0 (6)C14—C15—C16122.7 (6)
N4—Cu2—N581.3 (2)N5—C16—C15110.5 (5)
N4—Cu2—N6159.5 (2)N5—C17—C18107.0 (5)
N5—Cu2—N684.6 (2)N6—C18—C17109.6 (6)
N4—Cu2—Cl396.09 (17)
C5—N1—C1—C20.3 (10)C15—N4—C11—C121.1 (11)
Cu1—N1—C1—C2174.1 (5)Cu2—N4—C11—C12178.9 (5)
N1—C1—C2—C30.1 (12)N4—C11—C12—C130.0 (12)
C1—C2—C3—C40.9 (12)C11—C12—C13—C141.8 (12)
C2—C3—C4—C51.6 (11)C12—C13—C14—C152.5 (12)
C1—N1—C5—C40.5 (10)C11—N4—C15—C140.3 (10)
Cu1—N1—C5—C4175.5 (5)Cu2—N4—C15—C14179.7 (6)
C1—N1—C5—C6177.5 (6)C11—N4—C15—C16179.2 (6)
Cu1—N1—C5—C67.5 (7)Cu2—N4—C15—C160.8 (8)
C3—C4—C5—N11.5 (10)C13—C14—C15—N41.5 (11)
C3—C4—C5—C6178.3 (6)C13—C14—C15—C16179.0 (7)
C7—N2—C6—C5156.7 (6)C17—N5—C16—C15156.4 (6)
Cu1—N2—C6—C531.1 (7)Cu2—N5—C16—C1529.4 (7)
N1—C5—C6—N225.4 (8)N4—C15—C16—N519.2 (9)
C4—C5—C6—N2157.6 (6)C14—C15—C16—N5160.3 (7)
C6—N2—C7—C8168.2 (6)C16—N5—C17—C18162.7 (6)
Cu1—N2—C7—C841.3 (7)Cu2—N5—C17—C1836.1 (7)
C9—N3—C8—C7162.8 (6)C20—N6—C18—C17167.4 (6)
C10—N3—C8—C777.6 (7)C19—N6—C18—C1773.1 (7)
Cu1—N3—C8—C738.0 (6)Cu2—N6—C18—C1741.4 (6)
N2—C7—C8—N353.4 (8)N5—C17—C18—N651.7 (8)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C1—H1···Cl10.952.703.272 (8)119
C4—H4···Cl4i0.952.913.783 (8)153
C6—H6B···Cl30.992.803.578 (8)136
C7—H7B···Cl2ii0.992.973.661 (7)128
C9—H9B···Cl20.982.963.637 (8)127
C9—H9B···Cl40.982.943.827 (8)152
C9—H9C···Cl10.982.893.424 (8)116
C10—H10A···Cl10.982.963.494 (8)115
C10—H10B···Cl30.982.853.759 (8)155
N2—H2N···Cl20.91 (9)2.81 (9)3.430 (6)127 (6)
N2—H2N···Cl50.91 (9)2.39 (8)3.223 (6)153 (7)
N5—H5N···Cl5iii0.76 (9)2.62 (9)3.352 (7)161 (8)
C11—H11···Cl30.952.773.305 (7)117
C16—H16A···Cl6iv0.992.853.661 (8)140
C17—H17B···Cl4iv0.992.783.755 (8)168
C18—H18A···Cl5v0.992.913.799 (7)149
C19—H19A···Cl5v0.982.903.791 (8)151
C19—H19C···Cl30.982.973.531 (8)118
C20—H20A···Cl30.982.873.395 (8)114
C20—H20C···Cl5v0.982.983.860 (8)150
O1—H1O···Cl5iii0.96 (1)2.70 (6)3.358 (6)127 (5)
O1—H1O···Cl6iii0.96 (1)2.52 (5)3.295 (6)138 (6)
O1—H1P···Cl10.96 (1)2.37 (7)3.175 (6)141 (8)
C1—H1···Cl10.952.703.272 (8)119
C4—H4···Cl4i0.952.913.783 (8)153
C6—H6B···Cl30.992.803.578 (8)136
C7—H7B···Cl2ii0.992.973.661 (7)128
C9—H9B···Cl20.982.963.637 (8)127
C9—H9B···Cl40.982.943.827 (8)152
C9—H9C···Cl10.982.893.424 (8)116
C10—H10A···Cl10.982.963.494 (8)115
C10—H10B···Cl30.982.853.759 (8)155
N2—H2N···Cl20.91 (9)2.81 (9)3.430 (6)127 (6)
N2—H2N···Cl50.91 (9)2.39 (8)3.223 (6)153 (7)
N5—H5N···Cl5iii0.76 (9)2.62 (9)3.352 (7)161 (8)
C11—H11···Cl30.952.773.305 (7)117
C16—H16A···Cl6iv0.992.853.661 (8)140
C17—H17B···Cl4iv0.992.783.755 (8)168
C18—H18A···Cl5v0.992.913.799 (7)149
C19—H19A···Cl5v0.982.903.791 (8)151
C19—H19C···Cl30.982.973.531 (8)118
C20—H20A···Cl30.982.873.395 (8)114
C20—H20C···Cl5v0.982.983.860 (8)150
O1—H1O···Cl5iii0.96 (1)2.70 (6)3.358 (6)127 (5)
O1—H1O···Cl6iii0.96 (1)2.52 (5)3.295 (6)138 (6)
O1—H1P···Cl10.96 (1)2.37 (7)3.175 (6)141 (8)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z1/2; (ii) x, y+1, z; (iii) x1/2, y+1/2, z1/2; (iv) x1/2, y+1/2, z1; (v) x1/2, y+3/2, z1/2.
(2) top
Crystal data top
C12H17CuN5S2·0.3(H2O)F(000) = 2998
Mr = 363.76Dx = 1.510 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 27.626 (6) ÅCell parameters from 34080 reflections
b = 7.2787 (15) Åθ = 3.0–59.2°
c = 32.105 (6) ŵ = 1.63 mm1
β = 97.41 (3)°T = 170 K
V = 6402 (2) Å3Needle, green
Z = 160.02 × 0.02 × 0.01 mm
Data collection top
Stoe IPDS2T
diffractometer
5642 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube3563 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 6.67 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.094
ω scansθmax = 25.0°, θmin = 1.5°
Absorption correction: numerical
[face indexed (X-Red32 and X-Shape; Stoe & Cie, 2016)]
h = 3232
Tmin = 0.843, Tmax = 0.966k = 88
22311 measured reflectionsl = 3738
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.062Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F2) = 0.170H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.04 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0701P)2 + 34.5724P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
5642 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
378 parametersΔρmax = 2.09 e Å3
1 restraintΔρmin = 0.70 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
Cu10.11991 (3)0.14704 (11)0.41101 (2)0.0284 (2)
S10.02525 (7)0.3246 (3)0.45978 (7)0.0471 (5)
S20.23285 (8)0.2601 (3)0.35186 (8)0.0529 (6)
N10.1449 (2)0.1939 (9)0.47301 (17)0.0357 (14)
N20.1488 (2)0.3961 (8)0.40076 (18)0.0337 (14)
N30.09000 (19)0.1843 (8)0.35123 (17)0.0297 (13)
N40.1760 (2)0.0311 (9)0.39436 (19)0.0374 (14)
N50.0738 (2)0.0454 (9)0.42358 (19)0.0369 (14)
C10.0712 (2)0.0549 (10)0.3250 (2)0.0312 (15)
H10.0678880.0656310.3356570.037*
C20.0564 (3)0.0865 (12)0.2836 (2)0.0391 (18)
H20.0431790.0099910.2656650.047*
C30.0609 (2)0.2615 (11)0.2681 (2)0.0346 (17)
H30.0510700.2864820.2391850.041*
C40.0798 (2)0.4000 (10)0.2946 (2)0.0337 (16)
H40.0828580.5212690.2843210.040*
C50.0944 (2)0.3587 (9)0.3368 (2)0.0275 (14)
C60.1163 (3)0.4923 (10)0.3683 (2)0.0368 (17)
H6A0.1348880.5858110.3545770.044*
H6B0.0902040.5558100.3811960.044*
C70.1609 (3)0.4914 (11)0.4414 (2)0.0421 (19)
H7A0.1314690.5508800.4497990.051*
H7B0.1859100.5871420.4390950.051*
C80.1801 (3)0.3497 (12)0.4731 (2)0.0429 (19)
H8A0.2118650.3030480.4664060.051*
H8B0.1853670.4061560.5013490.051*
C90.1036 (3)0.2481 (12)0.4960 (2)0.046 (2)
H9A0.0870810.3556910.4823960.068*
H9B0.0803820.1460580.4955530.068*
H9C0.1161370.2782200.5251370.068*
C100.1689 (3)0.0320 (11)0.4941 (2)0.047 (2)
H10A0.1962460.0058720.4794540.071*
H10B0.1811280.0632930.5232990.071*
H10C0.1453730.0688690.4937150.071*
C110.1992 (2)0.1237 (9)0.3761 (2)0.0309 (15)
C120.0539 (2)0.1618 (10)0.4384 (2)0.0304 (15)
H2N0.177 (3)0.356 (16)0.393 (3)0.10 (4)*
Cu20.38379 (3)0.67227 (11)0.34576 (3)0.0292 (2)
S30.26967 (6)0.2390 (2)0.39685 (6)0.0332 (4)
S40.47701 (7)0.1765 (3)0.30465 (7)0.0436 (5)
N60.34344 (19)0.7200 (8)0.28949 (17)0.0299 (13)
N70.3559 (2)0.9188 (9)0.35779 (18)0.0349 (14)
N80.4325 (2)0.7206 (8)0.39821 (19)0.0351 (14)
N90.3360 (2)0.4933 (9)0.3731 (2)0.0481 (17)
N100.4249 (2)0.4835 (9)0.3244 (2)0.0452 (16)
C130.3321 (3)0.5949 (12)0.2593 (2)0.0439 (19)
H130.3426700.4714960.2639930.053*
C140.3051 (3)0.6423 (14)0.2210 (2)0.050 (2)
H140.2968180.5520580.1998810.059*
C150.2906 (3)0.8223 (14)0.2144 (2)0.049 (2)
H150.2729090.8584240.1883220.058*
C160.3020 (3)0.9483 (12)0.2456 (2)0.0398 (18)
H160.2920031.0726600.2417040.048*
C170.3283 (2)0.8923 (10)0.2830 (2)0.0308 (15)
C180.3436 (3)1.0233 (10)0.3187 (2)0.0329 (16)
H18A0.3722481.0954690.3126280.039*
H18B0.3166271.1099080.3217370.039*
C190.3911 (3)1.0146 (10)0.3899 (2)0.0373 (18)
H19A0.4175721.0726270.3764930.045*
H19B0.3742221.1112350.4042930.045*
C200.4115 (3)0.8719 (11)0.4206 (2)0.0415 (19)
H20A0.4370670.9268350.4413070.050*
H20B0.3853170.8237910.4359570.050*
C210.4405 (3)0.5567 (11)0.4260 (3)0.047 (2)
H21A0.4544220.4569840.4108750.070*
H21B0.4630030.5884130.4511120.070*
H21C0.4092240.5169010.4343670.070*
C220.4802 (3)0.7751 (11)0.3860 (3)0.0444 (19)
H22A0.4936660.6731910.3711560.067*
H22B0.4759520.8825690.3674910.067*
H22C0.5026940.8056090.4111980.067*
C230.4471 (3)0.3553 (10)0.3167 (2)0.0334 (16)
C240.3084 (2)0.3906 (10)0.3834 (2)0.0299 (15)
H7N0.328 (3)0.890 (11)0.368 (2)0.05 (2)*
O10.2063 (4)0.3173 (18)0.0543 (4)0.087 (4)0.6
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cu10.0302 (5)0.0282 (5)0.0272 (4)0.0011 (4)0.0052 (3)0.0005 (4)
S10.0456 (11)0.0339 (11)0.0619 (13)0.0078 (9)0.0072 (9)0.0164 (10)
S20.0525 (13)0.0291 (11)0.0831 (16)0.0058 (9)0.0316 (12)0.0050 (10)
N10.046 (3)0.037 (4)0.025 (3)0.002 (3)0.007 (3)0.005 (3)
N20.042 (4)0.029 (3)0.027 (3)0.003 (3)0.005 (3)0.003 (3)
N30.024 (3)0.032 (3)0.034 (3)0.007 (2)0.005 (2)0.004 (3)
N40.039 (4)0.032 (3)0.042 (4)0.005 (3)0.009 (3)0.003 (3)
N50.036 (3)0.038 (4)0.037 (3)0.000 (3)0.006 (3)0.008 (3)
C10.034 (4)0.028 (4)0.032 (4)0.003 (3)0.007 (3)0.002 (3)
C20.030 (4)0.052 (5)0.036 (4)0.005 (3)0.006 (3)0.011 (4)
C30.024 (4)0.050 (5)0.028 (4)0.010 (3)0.000 (3)0.010 (3)
C40.032 (4)0.035 (4)0.034 (4)0.003 (3)0.007 (3)0.005 (3)
C50.023 (3)0.028 (4)0.032 (4)0.001 (3)0.005 (3)0.004 (3)
C60.034 (4)0.031 (4)0.045 (4)0.000 (3)0.004 (3)0.000 (3)
C70.046 (5)0.046 (5)0.036 (4)0.012 (4)0.011 (3)0.015 (4)
C80.048 (5)0.052 (5)0.028 (4)0.006 (4)0.004 (3)0.011 (4)
C90.064 (5)0.042 (5)0.034 (4)0.006 (4)0.021 (4)0.001 (4)
C100.065 (5)0.038 (5)0.035 (4)0.017 (4)0.009 (4)0.002 (4)
C110.032 (4)0.019 (4)0.041 (4)0.000 (3)0.004 (3)0.001 (3)
C120.038 (4)0.026 (4)0.027 (3)0.003 (3)0.004 (3)0.004 (3)
Cu20.0316 (5)0.0220 (4)0.0343 (5)0.0005 (4)0.0049 (3)0.0013 (4)
S30.0310 (9)0.0282 (9)0.0415 (10)0.0054 (7)0.0086 (8)0.0056 (8)
S40.0495 (11)0.0288 (10)0.0568 (12)0.0055 (9)0.0227 (9)0.0018 (9)
N60.027 (3)0.035 (4)0.027 (3)0.003 (2)0.005 (2)0.010 (3)
N70.034 (3)0.036 (4)0.034 (3)0.005 (3)0.005 (3)0.003 (3)
N80.032 (3)0.031 (3)0.042 (3)0.006 (3)0.005 (3)0.005 (3)
N90.032 (4)0.038 (4)0.074 (5)0.001 (3)0.007 (3)0.012 (4)
N100.047 (4)0.039 (4)0.051 (4)0.010 (3)0.011 (3)0.002 (3)
C130.048 (5)0.038 (5)0.047 (5)0.007 (4)0.009 (4)0.009 (4)
C140.047 (5)0.072 (7)0.030 (4)0.020 (4)0.004 (3)0.020 (4)
C150.043 (4)0.069 (6)0.033 (4)0.002 (4)0.001 (3)0.005 (4)
C160.044 (4)0.047 (5)0.028 (4)0.001 (4)0.004 (3)0.003 (3)
C170.024 (3)0.033 (4)0.035 (4)0.001 (3)0.005 (3)0.001 (3)
C180.038 (4)0.030 (4)0.030 (4)0.005 (3)0.002 (3)0.002 (3)
C190.045 (4)0.029 (4)0.034 (4)0.009 (3)0.008 (3)0.014 (3)
C200.043 (4)0.047 (5)0.033 (4)0.010 (4)0.002 (3)0.007 (4)
C210.055 (5)0.032 (4)0.051 (5)0.001 (4)0.003 (4)0.019 (4)
C220.036 (4)0.041 (5)0.058 (5)0.001 (3)0.013 (4)0.005 (4)
C230.039 (4)0.031 (4)0.032 (4)0.001 (3)0.010 (3)0.004 (3)
C240.026 (4)0.028 (4)0.035 (4)0.001 (3)0.000 (3)0.004 (3)
O10.082 (8)0.075 (9)0.095 (9)0.024 (7)0.026 (7)0.007 (7)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cu1—N51.969 (6)Cu2—N101.961 (7)
Cu1—N32.008 (6)Cu2—N72.010 (6)
Cu1—N22.025 (6)Cu2—N62.027 (6)
Cu1—N12.049 (6)Cu2—N82.046 (6)
Cu1—N42.140 (6)Cu2—N92.123 (7)
S1—C121.626 (7)S3—C241.633 (7)
S2—C111.626 (7)S4—C231.615 (8)
N1—C101.474 (9)N6—C171.330 (9)
N1—C91.489 (9)N6—C131.337 (9)
N1—C81.495 (10)N7—C181.470 (9)
N2—C61.464 (9)N7—C191.496 (9)
N2—C71.477 (9)N8—C201.474 (9)
N3—C11.324 (9)N8—C221.478 (9)
N3—C51.362 (9)N8—C211.489 (9)
N4—C111.143 (9)N9—C241.147 (9)
N5—C121.146 (9)N10—C231.161 (9)
C1—C21.361 (10)C13—C141.398 (11)
C2—C31.379 (11)C14—C151.378 (13)
C3—C41.378 (10)C15—C161.365 (11)
C4—C51.397 (9)C16—C171.381 (10)
C5—C61.474 (10)C17—C181.509 (10)
C7—C81.497 (11)C19—C201.491 (10)
N5—Cu1—N395.4 (2)N10—Cu2—N7161.1 (3)
N5—Cu1—N2161.6 (3)N10—Cu2—N694.9 (2)
N3—Cu1—N281.1 (2)N7—Cu2—N680.7 (2)
N5—Cu1—N193.7 (2)N10—Cu2—N893.4 (3)
N3—Cu1—N1162.1 (2)N7—Cu2—N885.2 (2)
N2—Cu1—N185.3 (2)N6—Cu2—N8158.7 (2)
N5—Cu1—N497.4 (2)N10—Cu2—N997.6 (3)
N3—Cu1—N493.7 (2)N7—Cu2—N9101.2 (3)
N2—Cu1—N4100.9 (2)N6—Cu2—N9100.1 (2)
N1—Cu1—N4100.4 (2)N8—Cu2—N998.2 (3)
C10—N1—C9108.2 (6)C17—N6—C13119.3 (6)
C10—N1—C8110.5 (6)C17—N6—Cu2115.3 (4)
C9—N1—C8109.8 (6)C13—N6—Cu2125.4 (5)
C10—N1—Cu1112.9 (5)C18—N7—C19114.0 (6)
C9—N1—Cu1110.0 (5)C18—N7—Cu2110.5 (4)
C8—N1—Cu1105.4 (4)C19—N7—Cu2108.5 (4)
C6—N2—C7116.9 (6)C20—N8—C22110.5 (6)
C6—N2—Cu1109.0 (4)C20—N8—C21110.1 (6)
C7—N2—Cu1109.0 (5)C22—N8—C21107.8 (6)
C1—N3—C5119.5 (6)C20—N8—Cu2105.8 (4)
C1—N3—Cu1126.2 (5)C22—N8—Cu2110.0 (5)
C5—N3—Cu1114.0 (4)C21—N8—Cu2112.7 (5)
C11—N4—Cu1163.3 (6)C24—N9—Cu2172.2 (7)
C12—N5—Cu1165.5 (6)C23—N10—Cu2169.6 (6)
N3—C1—C2123.0 (7)N6—C13—C14121.2 (8)
C1—C2—C3118.6 (7)C15—C14—C13118.8 (7)
C4—C3—C2119.9 (6)C16—C15—C14119.4 (7)
C3—C4—C5118.8 (7)C15—C16—C17119.0 (8)
N3—C5—C4120.2 (6)N6—C17—C16122.3 (7)
N3—C5—C6115.4 (6)N6—C17—C18115.2 (6)
C4—C5—C6124.4 (6)C16—C17—C18122.5 (7)
N2—C6—C5109.4 (6)N7—C18—C17109.5 (6)
N2—C7—C8107.3 (6)C20—C19—N7106.7 (6)
N1—C8—C7110.4 (6)N8—C20—C19109.7 (6)
N4—C11—S2177.8 (7)N10—C23—S4178.3 (8)
N5—C12—S1179.1 (7)N9—C24—S3178.0 (7)
C5—N3—C1—C21.0 (10)C17—N6—C13—C140.5 (10)
Cu1—N3—C1—C2172.5 (5)Cu2—N6—C13—C14178.3 (5)
N3—C1—C2—C30.3 (10)N6—C13—C14—C150.9 (11)
C1—C2—C3—C40.5 (10)C13—C14—C15—C161.5 (12)
C2—C3—C4—C50.6 (10)C14—C15—C16—C170.8 (11)
C1—N3—C5—C40.9 (9)C13—N6—C17—C161.3 (10)
Cu1—N3—C5—C4173.4 (5)Cu2—N6—C17—C16177.6 (5)
C1—N3—C5—C6179.3 (6)C13—N6—C17—C18179.2 (6)
Cu1—N3—C5—C65.1 (7)Cu2—N6—C17—C180.3 (7)
C3—C4—C5—N30.1 (10)C15—C16—C17—N60.7 (11)
C3—C4—C5—C6178.4 (6)C15—C16—C17—C18178.4 (7)
C7—N2—C6—C5160.1 (6)C19—N7—C18—C17154.3 (6)
Cu1—N2—C6—C535.9 (7)Cu2—N7—C18—C1731.8 (7)
N3—C5—C6—N227.4 (8)N6—C17—C18—N720.8 (8)
C4—C5—C6—N2150.9 (7)C16—C17—C18—N7161.3 (6)
C6—N2—C7—C8162.0 (6)C18—N7—C19—C20162.4 (6)
Cu1—N2—C7—C838.0 (7)Cu2—N7—C19—C2038.8 (7)
C10—N1—C8—C7163.1 (6)C22—N8—C20—C1976.4 (8)
C9—N1—C8—C777.6 (7)C21—N8—C20—C19164.6 (6)
Cu1—N1—C8—C740.9 (7)Cu2—N8—C20—C1942.6 (7)
N2—C7—C8—N153.3 (8)N7—C19—C20—N854.8 (8)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C6—H6A···S2i0.992.943.786 (8)144
C8—H8A···S30.992.953.785 (8)143
C8—H8B···O1ii0.992.653.565 (15)154
C9—H9A···S1i0.982.923.881 (9)166
C9—H9B···N50.982.683.186 (10)112
N2—H2N···S30.91 (7)2.68 (7)3.546 (7)161 (9)
C14—H14···S2iii0.952.873.810 (9)170
C18—H18A···S4i0.993.003.932 (8)158
C19—H19B···S3i0.993.013.764 (8)133
C20—H20B···O1iii0.992.593.475 (16)149
C21—H21C···N90.982.643.186 (10)116
C22—H22A···N100.982.653.157 (11)112
C22—H22B···S4i0.982.943.912 (8)170
N7—H7N···S2i0.91 (6)2.83 (7)3.623 (7)146 (6)
Symmetry codes: (i) x, y+1, z; (ii) x, y+1, z+1/2; (iii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1/2.
 

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Dr Jevy V. Correia for mounting the crystals and collecting the data. We further acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Greifswald.

Funding information

Funding for this research was provided by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (award No. 504970452 to Carola Schulzke, Basam Alzoubi).

References

First citationAakeroy, C. B., Bryce, D. L., Desiraju, G. R., Frontera, A., Legon, A. C., Nicotra, F., Rissanen, K., Scheiner, S., Terraneo, G., Metrangolo, P. & Resnati, G. (2019). Pure Appl. Chem. 91, 1889–1892.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationAddison, A. W., Rao, T. N., Reedijk, J., van Rijn, J. & Verschoor, G. C. (1984). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 1349–1356.  CSD CrossRef Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBauzá, A., Mooibroek, T. J. & Frontera, A. (2015). ChemPhysChem 16, 2496–2517.  Web of Science PubMed Google Scholar
First citationBian, H.-D., Xu, J.-Y., Gu, W., Yan, S.-P., Liao, D.-Z., Jiang, Z.-H. & Cheng, P. (2003). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 6, 573–576.  CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationBlom, R. & Haaland, A. (1985). J. Mol. Struct. 128, 21–27.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBondi, A. (1964). J. Phys. Chem. 68, 441–451.  CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
First citationBruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Edgington, P. R., Kessler, M., Macrae, C. F., McCabe, P., Pearson, J. & Taylor, R. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 389–397.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationBruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Kessler, M., Luo, J., Motherwell, W. D. S., Purkis, L. H., Smith, B. R., Taylor, R., Cooper, R. I., Harris, S. E. & Orpen, A. G. (2004). J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 44, 2133–2144.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationCordero, B., Gómez, V., Platero-Prats, A. E., Revés, M., Echeverría, J., Cremades, E., Barragán, F. & Alvarez, S. (2008). Dalton Trans. pp. 2832–2838.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationCvek, B., Milacic, V., Taraba, J. & Dou, Q. P. (2008). J. Med. Chem. 51, 6256–6258.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationde Geest, D. J., Noble, A., Moubaraki, B., Murray, K. S., Larsen, D. S. & Brooker, S. (2007). Dalton Trans. pp. 467–475.  CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationFarrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationGhorai, P., Brandão, P., Bauzá, A., Frontera, A. & Saha, A. (2018). Inorg. Chim. Acta 469, 189–196.  CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationGroom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationHalldin Stenlid, J., Johansson, A. J. & Brinck, T. (2018). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 2676–2692.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationHandy, J. V., Ayala, G. & Pike, R. D. (2017). Inorg. Chim. Acta 456, 64–75.  CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationKumar, P., Kalita, A. & Mondal, B. (2013). Inorg. Chim. Acta 404, 88–96.  CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationLaussmann, T., Grzesiak, I., Krest, A., Stirnat, K., Meier–Giebing, S., Ruschewitz, U. & Klein, A. (2015). Drug Test. Anal. 7, 56–64.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationLi, W.-H., Chen, H.-N., Li, G.-H. & Liu, F.-Q. (2007). Acta Cryst. E63, m519–m520.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMacrae, C. F., Sovago, I., Cottrell, S. J., Galek, P. T. A., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Platings, M., Shields, G. P., Stevens, J. S., Towler, M. & Wood, P. A. (2020). J. Appl. Cryst. 53, 226–235.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationMadhu, V. (2022). CSD communication (refcode MATROP01). CCDC, Cambridge, England. https://dx.doi.org/10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc29c9ss  Google Scholar
First citationMahmudov, K. T., Gurbanov, A. V., Aliyeva, V. A., Guedes da Silva, M. F. C., Resnati, G. & Pombeiro, A. J. L. (2022). Coord. Chem. Rev. 464, 214556.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationMahmudov, K. T., Gurbanov, A. V., Aliyeva, V. A., Resnati, G. & Pombeiro, A. J. L. (2020). Coord. Chem. Rev. 418, 213381.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationMarzano, C., Pellei, M., Tisato, F. & Santini, C. (2009). Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 9, 185–211.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationMoncol, J. (2020). CSD communication (refcode QANDIT01). CCDC, Cambridge, England. https://dx.doi.org/10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc25h35z  Google Scholar
First citationNagarasu, P., Gayathri, P., Sri, S. N., Saisubramanian, N., Dhanaraj, P., Moon, D., Anthony, S. P. & Madhu, V. (2022). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 139, 109316.  CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationOrton, J. B., Thiam, I. E. & Coles, S. J. (2023). CSD communication (refcode FIXLOR). CCDC, Cambridge, England. https://dx.doi.org/10.5517/ccdc.csd.cc2h94yx  Google Scholar
First citationParsons, S., Flack, H. D. & Wagner, T. (2013). Acta Cryst. B69, 249–259.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationPaşaoğlu, H., Karadağ, A., Tezcan, F. & Büyükgüngör, O. (2005). Acta Cryst. C61, m93–m94.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationRaja, A., Rajendiran, V., Uma Maheswari, P., Balamurugan, R., Kilner, C. A., Halcrow, M. A. & Palaniandavar, M. (2005). J. Inorg. Biochem. 99, 1717–1732.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationRoy, S., Halder, B., Gomila, R. M., Frontera, A., Drew, M. G. B. & Chattopadhyay, S. (2024). Inorg. Chim. Acta 573, 122323.  CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationSantini, C., Pellei, M., Gandin, V., Porchia, M., Tisato, F. & Marzano, C. (2014). Chem. Rev. 114, 815–862.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
First citationSarkar, S., Mondal, A., Ribas, J., Drew, M. G. B., Pramanik, K. & Rajak, K. K. (2005). Inorg. Chim. Acta 358, 641–649.  CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationShen, W.-Z., Xie, C.-Z., Cheng, P., Chen, J.-T., Yan, S.-P., Liao, D.-Z. & Jiang, Z.-H. (2003). J. Chem. Res. 2003, 307–309.  CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
First citationSpek, A. L. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 9–18.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationStoe & Cie (2016). X-AREA. Stoe & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany.  Google Scholar
First citationŚwitlicka, A., Czerwińska, K., Machura, B., Penkala, M., Bieńko, A., Bieńko, D. & Zierkiewicz, W. (2016). CrystEngComm 18, 9042–9055.  Google Scholar
First citationTardito, S. & Marchiò, L. (2009). Curr. Med. Chem. 16, 1325–1348.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationWang, T. & Guo, Z. (2006). Curr. Med. Chem. 13, 525–537.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
First citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
First citationZhang, X., Bian, H., Gu, W., Xu, J., Yan, S. & Liang, H. (2009). J. Chem. Res. pp., 274–276.  Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds