research communications
accessSynthesis and structure of catena-poly[[[bis(pyridin-2-yl)amine]cadmium(II)]-di-μ2-azido]
aDépartement de Technologie, Faculté de Technologie, Université 20 Août 1955-Skikda, BP 26, Route d'El-Hadaiek, Skikda 21000, Algeria, bLaboratoire de Chimie, Ingénierie Moléculaire et Nanostructures (LCIMN), Université Ferhat Abbas Sétif 1, Sétif 19000, Algeria, cDepartment of Chemistry, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA, and dChemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Hadhramout University, Mukalla, Hadhramout, Yemen
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In the title compound, [Cd(N3)2(C10H9N3)]n, the cadmium(II) ion displays a distorted CdN6 octahedral geometry arising from one bidentate ligand and four azide ions and forms zigzag polymeric [100] chains via the bridging azide ions, both of which show μ1,1 (end-on) coordination. Adjacent chains are linked into layers via N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds. Hirshfeld surface analysis was used to quantify the intermolecular interactions.
Keywords: solvothermal synthesis; crystal structure; coordination polymer; cadmium; azide; amine.
CCDC reference: 2522304
1. Chemical context
Cadmium(II) coordination polymers containing polynitrile or pseudohalide ligands have been widely investigated because of their (Addala et al., 2019
; Majumder et al., 2017
) or photocatalysis (Roy et al., 2017
) properties. Generally, the crystal chemistry of the CdII ion is dominated by coordination numbers of four to six (Setifi et al., 2017
; Liu et al., 2016
). As for the choice of anionic ligands, pseudohalides are considered as a good linker species. In particular, the azide ligand is an attractive bridging ligand due to the variability of its coordination modes, such as the common μ1,1 (end-on, EO) and μ1,3 (end-to end, EE) modes with single or double azide bridges (Setifi et al., 2025
; Merabet et al., 2023
). Therefore, such anionic ligands are used for studying magnetochemistry and for the construction of coordination frameworks (Benamara et al., 2021
; Merabet et al., 2022
).
As part of our ongoing work in this area, the title one-dimensional CdII coordination polymer, [Cd(N3)2(C10H9N3)]n (I), was synthesized and characterized and is reported herein.
2. Structural commentary
In compound (I), the cadmium ion adopts a distorted CdN6 octahedral coordination geometry (Table 1
) provided by two N atoms from the chelating ligand (N7 and N9) in cis positions, two from the μ2;η1-azide ions in the asymmetric unit and the last two from symmetry generated μ2;η1-azide ions (N1i at 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z and N4ii at 2 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z) (Fig. 1
). Part of the distortion results from the small bite angle of the chelating ligand giving an N7—Cd1—N9 angle of 80.59 (9)° while the N1—Cd1—N4 angle, at 95.09 (10)°, is closer to the ideal value. Four Cd—N distances are in the narrow range of 2.293 (3)–2.332 (2) Å but the other two are notably longer at 2.394 (3) Å (Cd1—N1i) and 2.436 (3) Å (Cd1—N4ii) (Fig. 1
) making the Cd(μ2(N3)2)Cd units unsymmetrical. This also leads to two different Cd⋯Cd distances with Cd1⋯Cd1i being 3.6812 (4) Å while the Cd1⋯Cd1ii separation is 3.7432 (4) Å (Fig. 1
).
|
| Figure 1 The coordination sphere of the metal ion in (I) with 50% probability ellipsoids. Symmetry codes: (i) −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1; (ii) −x + 2, −y + 1, −z + 1. |
3. Supramolecular features
In the crystal, the cis position of the bridging azide ligands leads to the formation of zigzag chains built up from Cd(μ2(N3)2)Cd units extending along the a-axis direction, which are connected by N8—H8⋯N6 hydrogen bonds (Table 2
) into layers lying parallel to the ac plane (Figs. 2
and 3
).
| |||||||||||||||||
| Figure 2 The packing in (I) viewed along the a-axis direction showing end views of several chains. The N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds are depicted by dashed lines and non-interacting hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. |
| Figure 3 The packing in (I) viewed along the c-axis direction showing side views of several chains. The N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds are depicted by dashed lines and non-interacting hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. |
4. Database survey
A search of the Cambridge Structural Database [CSD, updated to September 2025 (Groom et al., 2016
)] with the search fragment shown in Fig. 4
a gave 65 hits, 21 of which contained coordinated azide ions. Of these, 16 were considered most similar to the title compound while one was monomeric and the remaining four contained exclusively Cd—N=N=N—Cd bridging units. Table 3
lists the title compound and the most similar ones with pertinent geometric details. The compounds with refcodes FEBKED to UMUSUS contain a chelating ligand similar to that in the title compound so that the two Cd(μ2(N3)2)Cd units are cis to one another and unsymmetrically bridged as well. The Cd—N distances are comparable although the short–long pattern is not always in the same order. Except for OWOGAK, which has two different Cd⋯Cd separations as is the case with the title molecule, the Cd⋯Cd separations are equivalent by symmetry. For FARZEF, FARZIJ and TERHUT, pairs of Cd ions are bridged either by one μ2;η1-N3 ion and one μ3;η1-N3 ion or by two μ3;η1-N3 ions. Here, the Cd—N distances to the μ2;η1-N3 ion are comparable to the shorter ones seen in (I) but those to the μ3;η1-N3 grouping are noticeably longer as expected. The last group contains Cd(μ2(N3)2)Cd units which are trans to one another but the bridging units are still unsymmetrical except for GOYROD where requires them to be symmetrical.
|
| Figure 4 (a) The search fragment used where ‘Any' refers to any bond type (single, double or delocalized) in the CSD search, and (B) the key for column headings in Table 3 |
5. Hirshfeld surface analysis
A Hirshfeld surface (HS) analysis was performed using CrystalExplorer (Spackman et al., 2021
) to explore the intermolecular interactions in the crystal of (I). Descriptions and interpretations of the plots obtained have been published (Tan et al., 2019
). The dnorm HS for a portion of one chain is shown in Fig. 5
with the bright red spots on the right side showing the sites of N—Cd bonds that continue the chain. The red spots on the top of the surface indicate the locations of the N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds, which connect the chains. Fig. 6
shows the two-dimensional fingerprint plots with Fig. 6
a showing all intermolecular interactions. This is characterized by two pairs of sharp peaks and a broader central one. Delineation of these into specific atom⋯atom interactions shows the central peak to represent H⋯H interactions at 37.2% of the total and the pair with tips at de + di ≃ 2.2 Å (Fig. 6
c) consistent with the N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds at 38.0% of the total. The C⋯H/H⋯C interactions constitute 18.3% of the total and appear as a pair of broad peaks at de + di ≃ 3 Å (Fig. 6
d). These do not appear to represent any specific interactions as calculations of intermolecular distances do not show any C—H⋯π(ring) interactions to be present. Finally, the pair of sharp peaks with de + di ≃ 2.4 Å (Fig. 6
e) can be attributed to the Cd—N bonds mentioned above that continue the chain beyond that fragment used in the calculation of the HS.
| Figure 5 The dnorm Hirshfeld surface for (I). |
| Figure 6 Two-dimensional fingerprint plots for (I) showing all interactions (a) and those delineated into H⋯H (b), N⋯H/H⋯N (c), C⋯H/H⋯C (d) and Cd—N (e) interactions. |
6. Synthesis and crystallization
The title compound was prepared under solvothermal conditions from a mixture of cadmium(II) nitrate tetrahydrate (62 mg, 0.20 mmol), 2,2′-dipyridylamine (17 mg, 0.10 mmol), sodium azide (26 mg, 0.40 mmol), N,N-dimethylformamide (10 ml) and water (7 ml), which was sonicated for 30min. Then the reaction mixture was transferred to a Teflon-lined stainless steel reactor and heated to 403 K for 2 days. After cooling to room temperature at a rate of 10 K h−1, colourless block-shaped crystals of (I) were collected.
7. Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure details are summarized in Table 4
. The N-bound H atom was located in a difference map and its position was freely refined. The C-bound H atoms were located geometrically (C—H = 0.93 Å) and refined as riding atoms.
|
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 2522304
contains datablocks I, global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989026000289/hb8184sup1.cif
Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989026000289/hb8184Isup2.hkl
| [Cd(N3)3(C10H9N3)] | F(000) = 720 |
| Mr = 367.66 | Dx = 1.875 Mg m−3 |
| Monoclinic, P21/c | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
| a = 6.6655 (5) Å | Cell parameters from 9995 reflections |
| b = 18.5106 (17) Å | θ = 3.0–32.3° |
| c = 10.5746 (9) Å | µ = 1.68 mm−1 |
| β = 93.612 (3)° | T = 298 K |
| V = 1302.13 (19) Å3 | Block, colourless |
| Z = 4 | 0.34 × 0.21 × 0.17 mm |
| Bruker D8 Quest PHOTON 100 CCD diffractometer | 5357 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| φ and ω scans | Rint = 0.050 |
| Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015) | θmax = 36.4°, θmin = 2.9° |
| Tmin = 0.796, Tmax = 0.877 | h = −11→8 |
| 64159 measured reflections | k = −30→30 |
| 6322 independent reflections | l = −17→17 |
| Refinement on F2 | Primary atom site location: dual |
| Least-squares matrix: full | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.055 | Hydrogen site location: mixed |
| wR(F2) = 0.096 | H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement |
| S = 1.37 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + 2.1586P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
| 6322 reflections | (Δ/σ)max = 0.001 |
| 185 parameters | Δρmax = 1.19 e Å−3 |
| 1 restraint | Δρmin = −1.10 e Å−3 |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. H-atoms attached to carbon were placed in calculated positions (C—H = 0.95 Å) and were included as riding contributions with isotropic displacement parameters 1.2 times those of the attached atoms. That attached to nitrogen was placed in a location derived from a difference map and refined with a DFIX 0.89 0.01 instruction |
| x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | ||
| Cd1 | 0.75506 (3) | 0.49321 (2) | 0.57654 (2) | 0.03175 (6) | |
| N1 | 0.5582 (4) | 0.56986 (17) | 0.4517 (3) | 0.0413 (6) | |
| N2 | 0.6135 (4) | 0.60430 (14) | 0.3655 (3) | 0.0355 (5) | |
| N3 | 0.6614 (6) | 0.6371 (2) | 0.2803 (3) | 0.0616 (9) | |
| N4 | 0.9227 (4) | 0.44425 (16) | 0.4095 (2) | 0.0366 (5) | |
| N5 | 0.8521 (4) | 0.43719 (15) | 0.3032 (2) | 0.0342 (5) | |
| N6 | 0.7900 (5) | 0.4295 (2) | 0.2006 (3) | 0.0570 (9) | |
| N7 | 0.7069 (4) | 0.55560 (14) | 0.7636 (2) | 0.0339 (5) | |
| N8 | 0.7629 (5) | 0.46074 (16) | 0.9133 (2) | 0.0414 (6) | |
| H8 | 0.762 (6) | 0.454 (2) | 0.9962 (11) | 0.045 (11)* | |
| N9 | 0.8345 (4) | 0.40164 (14) | 0.7223 (2) | 0.0323 (5) | |
| C4 | 0.6731 (6) | 0.6269 (2) | 0.7451 (4) | 0.0472 (8) | |
| H4 | 0.656367 | 0.643523 | 0.662142 | 0.057* | |
| C5 | 0.6618 (7) | 0.6763 (2) | 0.8408 (4) | 0.0566 (10) | |
| H5 | 0.638413 | 0.724920 | 0.823253 | 0.068* | |
| C6 | 0.6862 (6) | 0.6517 (2) | 0.9641 (4) | 0.0553 (10) | |
| H6 | 0.679635 | 0.683707 | 1.031517 | 0.066* | |
| C7 | 0.7197 (5) | 0.5804 (2) | 0.9861 (3) | 0.0447 (7) | |
| H7 | 0.735825 | 0.563157 | 1.068661 | 0.054* | |
| C8 | 0.7299 (4) | 0.53278 (17) | 0.8829 (3) | 0.0329 (5) | |
| C9 | 0.7960 (4) | 0.39917 (17) | 0.8450 (3) | 0.0332 (6) | |
| C10 | 0.7921 (7) | 0.3336 (2) | 0.9106 (3) | 0.0513 (9) | |
| H10 | 0.764813 | 0.333059 | 0.995747 | 0.062* | |
| C11 | 0.8280 (8) | 0.2708 (2) | 0.8499 (4) | 0.0619 (11) | |
| H11 | 0.823748 | 0.226957 | 0.892713 | 0.074* | |
| C12 | 0.8711 (7) | 0.2726 (2) | 0.7232 (4) | 0.0566 (10) | |
| H12 | 0.898021 | 0.230431 | 0.679391 | 0.068* | |
| C13 | 0.8726 (6) | 0.3382 (2) | 0.6654 (3) | 0.0467 (8) | |
| H13 | 0.902013 | 0.339522 | 0.580567 | 0.056* |
| U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
| Cd1 | 0.02633 (9) | 0.04938 (12) | 0.01945 (8) | −0.00229 (9) | 0.00072 (6) | 0.00442 (8) |
| N1 | 0.0259 (11) | 0.0631 (18) | 0.0341 (13) | −0.0045 (11) | −0.0051 (9) | 0.0172 (12) |
| N2 | 0.0291 (11) | 0.0394 (13) | 0.0372 (13) | −0.0044 (9) | −0.0038 (9) | 0.0049 (10) |
| N3 | 0.062 (2) | 0.070 (2) | 0.053 (2) | −0.0140 (18) | 0.0035 (16) | 0.0210 (17) |
| N4 | 0.0270 (11) | 0.0641 (17) | 0.0191 (9) | −0.0058 (11) | 0.0044 (8) | −0.0026 (10) |
| N5 | 0.0303 (11) | 0.0491 (14) | 0.0236 (10) | −0.0058 (10) | 0.0051 (8) | −0.0022 (9) |
| N6 | 0.0508 (18) | 0.095 (3) | 0.0247 (13) | −0.0106 (17) | −0.0029 (12) | −0.0051 (14) |
| N7 | 0.0343 (12) | 0.0438 (13) | 0.0242 (10) | 0.0019 (10) | 0.0063 (9) | 0.0015 (9) |
| N8 | 0.0583 (18) | 0.0509 (15) | 0.0151 (10) | 0.0058 (13) | 0.0025 (10) | 0.0018 (9) |
| N9 | 0.0336 (12) | 0.0432 (13) | 0.0199 (9) | 0.0037 (10) | 0.0003 (8) | 0.0015 (8) |
| C4 | 0.051 (2) | 0.0485 (19) | 0.0424 (18) | 0.0033 (15) | 0.0094 (15) | 0.0066 (14) |
| C5 | 0.064 (3) | 0.0426 (19) | 0.064 (3) | 0.0026 (17) | 0.013 (2) | −0.0035 (17) |
| C6 | 0.057 (2) | 0.059 (2) | 0.050 (2) | −0.0026 (18) | 0.0113 (18) | −0.0211 (18) |
| C7 | 0.0459 (18) | 0.060 (2) | 0.0286 (14) | −0.0002 (15) | 0.0059 (13) | −0.0081 (13) |
| C8 | 0.0283 (12) | 0.0488 (16) | 0.0219 (11) | −0.0007 (11) | 0.0043 (9) | −0.0042 (10) |
| C9 | 0.0322 (13) | 0.0451 (16) | 0.0216 (11) | 0.0021 (11) | −0.0029 (9) | 0.0033 (10) |
| C10 | 0.070 (3) | 0.055 (2) | 0.0283 (15) | 0.0042 (18) | −0.0020 (15) | 0.0111 (14) |
| C11 | 0.088 (3) | 0.045 (2) | 0.051 (2) | 0.005 (2) | −0.011 (2) | 0.0118 (17) |
| C12 | 0.076 (3) | 0.0447 (19) | 0.047 (2) | 0.0089 (18) | −0.0083 (19) | −0.0075 (16) |
| C13 | 0.058 (2) | 0.0513 (19) | 0.0302 (15) | 0.0069 (16) | −0.0013 (14) | −0.0050 (13) |
| Cd1—N1 | 2.293 (3) | C4—C5 | 1.369 (5) |
| Cd1—N9 | 2.330 (2) | C4—H4 | 0.9300 |
| Cd1—N7 | 2.330 (2) | C5—C6 | 1.382 (6) |
| Cd1—N4 | 2.332 (2) | C5—H5 | 0.9300 |
| Cd1—N1i | 2.394 (3) | C6—C7 | 1.355 (6) |
| Cd1—N4ii | 2.436 (3) | C6—H6 | 0.9300 |
| N1—N2 | 1.190 (4) | C7—C8 | 1.408 (4) |
| N2—N3 | 1.148 (4) | C7—H7 | 0.9300 |
| N4—N5 | 1.199 (3) | C9—C10 | 1.399 (5) |
| N5—N6 | 1.145 (4) | C10—C11 | 1.357 (6) |
| N7—C8 | 1.330 (4) | C10—H10 | 0.9300 |
| N7—C4 | 1.352 (4) | C11—C12 | 1.389 (6) |
| N8—C9 | 1.375 (4) | C11—H11 | 0.9300 |
| N8—C8 | 1.386 (4) | C12—C13 | 1.361 (5) |
| N8—H8 | 0.885 (10) | C12—H12 | 0.9300 |
| N9—C9 | 1.339 (3) | C13—H13 | 0.9300 |
| N9—C13 | 1.351 (4) | ||
| N1—Cd1—N9 | 158.28 (9) | C13—N9—Cd1 | 112.2 (2) |
| N1—Cd1—N7 | 94.44 (10) | N7—C4—C5 | 124.2 (4) |
| N9—Cd1—N7 | 80.59 (9) | N7—C4—H4 | 117.9 |
| N1—Cd1—N4 | 95.09 (10) | C5—C4—H4 | 117.9 |
| N9—Cd1—N4 | 96.82 (9) | C4—C5—C6 | 117.9 (4) |
| N7—Cd1—N4 | 159.02 (9) | C4—C5—H5 | 121.0 |
| N1—Cd1—N1i | 76.52 (11) | C6—C5—H5 | 121.0 |
| N9—Cd1—N1i | 83.57 (9) | C7—C6—C5 | 119.4 (3) |
| N7—Cd1—N1i | 100.49 (10) | C7—C6—H6 | 120.3 |
| N4—Cd1—N1i | 99.89 (10) | C5—C6—H6 | 120.3 |
| N1—Cd1—N4ii | 102.19 (10) | C6—C7—C8 | 119.5 (3) |
| N9—Cd1—N4ii | 98.22 (9) | C6—C7—H7 | 120.2 |
| N7—Cd1—N4ii | 83.17 (9) | C8—C7—H7 | 120.2 |
| N4—Cd1—N4ii | 76.57 (10) | N7—C8—N8 | 122.2 (3) |
| N1i—Cd1—N4ii | 176.17 (9) | N7—C8—C7 | 121.8 (3) |
| N2—N1—Cd1 | 125.4 (2) | N8—C8—C7 | 115.9 (3) |
| N2—N1—Cd1i | 118.4 (2) | N9—C9—N8 | 121.8 (3) |
| Cd1—N1—Cd1i | 103.48 (11) | N9—C9—C10 | 121.4 (3) |
| N3—N2—N1 | 178.0 (3) | N8—C9—C10 | 116.8 (3) |
| N5—N4—Cd1 | 125.1 (2) | C11—C10—C9 | 120.0 (3) |
| N5—N4—Cd1ii | 113.66 (19) | C11—C10—H10 | 120.0 |
| Cd1—N4—Cd1ii | 103.43 (10) | C9—C10—H10 | 120.0 |
| N6—N5—N4 | 177.9 (4) | C10—C11—C12 | 119.3 (4) |
| C8—N7—C4 | 117.1 (3) | C10—C11—H11 | 120.4 |
| C8—N7—Cd1 | 129.3 (2) | C12—C11—H11 | 120.4 |
| C4—N7—Cd1 | 113.1 (2) | C13—C12—C11 | 117.6 (4) |
| C9—N8—C8 | 134.7 (2) | C13—C12—H12 | 121.2 |
| C9—N8—H8 | 115 (3) | C11—C12—H12 | 121.2 |
| C8—N8—H8 | 111 (2) | N9—C13—C12 | 124.7 (3) |
| C9—N9—C13 | 117.1 (3) | N9—C13—H13 | 117.7 |
| C9—N9—Cd1 | 128.1 (2) | C12—C13—H13 | 117.7 |
| C8—N7—C4—C5 | 0.2 (5) | C13—N9—C9—N8 | 177.4 (3) |
| Cd1—N7—C4—C5 | −172.7 (3) | Cd1—N9—C9—N8 | −22.4 (4) |
| N7—C4—C5—C6 | −0.1 (6) | C13—N9—C9—C10 | −1.1 (5) |
| C4—C5—C6—C7 | −0.1 (6) | Cd1—N9—C9—C10 | 159.0 (3) |
| C5—C6—C7—C8 | 0.2 (6) | C8—N8—C9—N9 | 11.1 (6) |
| C4—N7—C8—N8 | 179.2 (3) | C8—N8—C9—C10 | −170.3 (4) |
| Cd1—N7—C8—N8 | −9.2 (4) | N9—C9—C10—C11 | 0.1 (6) |
| C4—N7—C8—C7 | 0.0 (4) | N8—C9—C10—C11 | −178.5 (4) |
| Cd1—N7—C8—C7 | 171.5 (2) | C9—C10—C11—C12 | 0.9 (7) |
| C9—N8—C8—N7 | 6.0 (6) | C10—C11—C12—C13 | −0.8 (7) |
| C9—N8—C8—C7 | −174.7 (4) | C9—N9—C13—C12 | 1.2 (6) |
| C6—C7—C8—N7 | −0.2 (5) | Cd1—N9—C13—C12 | −162.0 (3) |
| C6—C7—C8—N8 | −179.5 (3) | C11—C12—C13—N9 | −0.2 (7) |
| Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) −x+2, −y+1, −z+1. |
| D—H···A | D—H | H···A | D···A | D—H···A |
| N8—H8···N6iii | 0.89 (1) | 2.21 (1) | 3.086 (4) | 174 (4) |
| Symmetry code: (iii) x, y, z+1. |
| REFCODE | a1 | b1 | c1 | d1 | e1 | f1 | Reference |
| (I) | 2.394 (3) | 2.293 (3) | 2.332 (2) | 2.436 (3) | 3.6812 (4) | 3.7432 (4) | This work |
| FEBKED | 2.334 (2) | 2.399 (2) | 2.399 (2) | 2.334 (2) | 307917 (9) | 3.7917 (9) | He & Lu (2004) |
| FEBKED01 | 2.312 (3) | 2.422 (3) | 2.422 (3) | 2.312 (3) | 3.7728 (2) | 3.7728 (2) | Abu-Youssef 2005 |
| OWOGAK | 2.445 (2) | 2.300 (2) | 2.2811 (19) | 2.3610 (18) | 3.7266 (2) | 3.7871 (2) | Marandi et al. (2016) |
| QUXZOZ | 2.411 (2) | 2.303 (2) | 2.303 (2) | 2.411 (2) | 3.7643 (4) | 3.7728 (2) | Chen et al. (2010) |
| UMUSUS | 2.367 (4) | 2.322 (5) | 2.323 (5) | 2.367 (4) | 3.6327 (9) | 3.6327 (9) | Wan et al. (2016) |
| FARZEF | 2.283 (6) | 2.490 (5)2 | 2.408 (4)2 | 2.326 (6) | 3.7351 (6) | 3.6992 (7) | Machura et al. (2012) |
| FARZIJ | 2.278 (6) | 2.376 (4)2 | 2.396 (5)2 | 2.252 (5) | 3.6763 (10) | 3.6432 (10) | Machura et al. (2012) |
| TEPHUT | 2.283 (4) | 2.439 (4)2 | 2.471 (3)2 | 2.314 (4) | 3.6146 (5) | 3.7018 (5) | Bai et al. (2013) |
| GIWYER | 2.371 (2) | 2.351 (2) | 2.351 (2) | 2.371 (2) | 3.6935 (11) | 3.6935 (11) | Goher et al. (2008) |
| GIWYIV | 2.369 (5) | 2.312 (4) | 2.355 (6) | 2.326 (5) | 3.5665 (19) | 3.5516 (19) | Goher et al. (2008) |
| GOYROB | 2.3441 (18) | 2.3421 (17) | 2.3421 (17) | 2.3441 (18) | 3.5298 (3) | 3.5298 (3) | Mautner et al. (2015) |
| KABSUB | 2.411 (3) | 2.308 (2) | 2.411 (3) | 2.308 (2) | 3.6267 (2) | 3.6267 (2) | Yang et al. (2010) |
| WUBSIV | 2.359 (6) | 2.329 (6) | 2.329 (6) | 2.585 (6) | 3.7050 (16) | 3.9291 (16) | Goher et al. (2002) |
| Notes: (1) see Fig. 4b for key; (2) distance to µ3-N3 ion. |
Acknowledgements
The Small Molecule Crystallography Center of ETH Zurich is thanked for its support for the XRD data collection.
Funding information
Funding for this research was provided by: the Algerian MESRS (Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research); the Algerian DGRSDT (Directorate General for Scientific Research and Technological Development); and the PRFU project (grant No. B00L01UN190120230003).
References
Abu-Youssef, M. A. M. (2005). J. Coord. Chem. 58, 1377–1386. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Addala, A., Poupon, M., Bernès, S., Kürkçüoğlu, G. S., Liu, X., Lehchili, F., Kučeráková, M., Dušek, M., Setifi, F., Setifi, Z. & Reedijk, J. (2019). Polyhedron 170, 271–277. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Bai, S.-Q., Fang, C.-J., He, Z., Gao, E.-Q., Yan, C. & Hor, T. S. A. (2013). CrystEngComm 15, 650–653. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Benamara, N., Setifi, Z., Yang, C.-I., Bernès, S., Geiger, D. K., Kürkçüoğlu, G. S., Setifi, F. & Reedijk, J. (2021). Magnetochemistry 7, 50. Google Scholar
Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2012). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany. Google Scholar
Bruker (2018). APEX4 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Chen, F., Zheng, F.-K., Liu, G.-N., Wu, M.-F. & Guo, G.-C. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, m758. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Goher, M. A. S., Mautner, F. A., Abu-Youssef, M. A. M., Hafez, A. K. & Badr, A. M.-A. (2002). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 3309–3312. CrossRef Google Scholar
Goher, M. A. S., Mautner, F. A., Gatterer, K., Abu-Youssef, M. A. M., Badr, A. M. A., Sodin, B. & Gspan, C. (2008). J. Mol. Struct. 876, 199–205. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Groom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
He, X. & Lu, C.-Z. (2004). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 630, 2583–2586. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Krause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10. Web of Science CSD CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Liu, B., Zhou, H.-F., Hou, L., Wang, J.-P., Wang, Y.-Y. & Zhu, Z. (2016). Inorg. Chem. 55, 8871–8880. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Machura, B., Nawrot, I. & Michalik, K. (2012). Polyhedron 31, 548–557. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Majumder, I., Chakraborty, P., Dasgupta, S., Massera, C., Escudero, D. & Das, D. (2017). Inorg. Chem. 56, 12893–12901. CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Marandi, F., Moeini, K. & Rudbari, H. A. (2016). Z. Naturforsch. B 71, 959–965. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Mautner, F. A., Scherzer, M., Berger, C., Fischer, R. C., Vicente, R. & Massoud, S. S. (2015). Polyhedron 85, 329–336. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Merabet, L., Setifi, Z., Ferjani, H., Geiger, D. K., Glidewell, C., Kanmazalp, S. D., Setifi, F. & Kaboub, L. (2023). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 53, 209–216. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Merabet, L., Vologzhanina, A. V., Setifi, Z., Kaboub, L. & Setifi, F. (2022). CrystEngComm 24, 4740–4747. Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Roy, S., Harms, K., Bauzá, A., Frontera, A. & Chattopadhyay, S. (2017). Polyhedron 121, 199–205. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Setifi, Z., Setifi, F., Geiger, D. K., Maris, T., Aljerf, L. & Glidewell, C. (2025). Acta Cryst. E81, 977–981. CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Setifi, Z., Zambon, D., Setifi, F., El-Ghozzi, M., Mahiou, R. & Glidewell, C. (2017). Acta Cryst. C73, 674–681. Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Spackman, P. R., Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2021). J. Appl. Cryst. 54, 1006–1011. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Tan, S. L., Jotani, M. M. & Tiekink, E. R. T. (2019). Acta Cryst. E75, 308–318. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Wan, J., Cai, S.-L., Zhang, K., Li, C.-J., Feng, Y., Fan, J., Zheng, S.-R. & Zhang, W.-G. (2016). CrystEngComm 18, 5164–5176. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Yang, E.-C., Shi, X.-J., Liu, Z.-Y. & Zhao, X.-Z. (2010). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 13, 733–736. CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
access
journal menu



