research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Synthesis and structure of catena-poly[[[bis­­(pyridin-2-yl)amine]­cadmium(II)]-di-μ2-azido]

crossmark logo

aDépartement de Technologie, Faculté de Technologie, Université 20 Août 1955-Skikda, BP 26, Route d'El-Hadaiek, Skikda 21000, Algeria, bLaboratoire de Chimie, Ingénierie Moléculaire et Nanostructures (LCIMN), Université Ferhat Abbas Sétif 1, Sétif 19000, Algeria, cDepartment of Chemistry, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA, and dChemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Hadhramout University, Mukalla, Hadhramout, Yemen
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]

Edited by W. T. A. Harrison, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom (Received 5 January 2026; accepted 12 January 2026; online 16 January 2026)

In the title compound, [Cd(N3)2(C10H9N3)]n, the cadmium(II) ion displays a distorted CdN6 octa­hedral geometry arising from one bidentate ligand and four azide ions and forms zigzag polymeric [100] chains via the bridging azide ions, both of which show μ1,1 (end-on) coordination. Adjacent chains are linked into layers via N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds. Hirshfeld surface analysis was used to qu­antify the inter­molecular inter­actions.

1. Chemical context

Cadmium(II) coordination polymers containing polynitrile or pseudohalide ligands have been widely investigated because of their photoluminescence (Addala et al., 2019View full citation; Majumder et al., 2017View full citation) or photocatalysis (Roy et al., 2017View full citation) properties. Generally, the crystal chemistry of the CdII ion is dominated by coordination numbers of four to six (Setifi et al., 2017View full citation; Liu et al., 2016View full citation). As for the choice of anionic ligands, pseudohalides are considered as a good linker species. In particular, the azide ligand is an attractive bridging ligand due to the variability of its coordination modes, such as the common μ1,1 (end-on, EO) and μ1,3 (end-to end, EE) modes with single or double azide bridges (Setifi et al., 2025View full citation; Merabet et al., 2023View full citation). Therefore, such anionic ligands are used for studying magnetochemistry and for the construction of coordination frameworks (Benamara et al., 2021View full citation; Merabet et al., 2022View full citation).

[Scheme 1]

As part of our ongoing work in this area, the title one-dimensional CdII coordination polymer, [Cd(N3)2(C10H9N3)]n (I), was synthesized and characterized and is reported herein.

2. Structural commentary

In compound (I), the cadmium ion adopts a distorted CdN6 octa­hedral coordination geometry (Table 1[link]) provided by two N atoms from the chelating ligand (N7 and N9) in cis positions, two from the μ2;η1-azide ions in the asymmetric unit and the last two from symmetry generated μ2;η1-azide ions (N1i at 1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z and N4ii at 2 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z) (Fig. 1[link]). Part of the distortion results from the small bite angle of the chelating ligand giving an N7—Cd1—N9 angle of 80.59 (9)° while the N1—Cd1—N4 angle, at 95.09 (10)°, is closer to the ideal value. Four Cd—N distances are in the narrow range of 2.293 (3)–2.332 (2) Å but the other two are notably longer at 2.394 (3) Å (Cd1—N1i) and 2.436 (3) Å (Cd1—N4ii) (Fig. 1[link]) making the Cd(μ2(N3)2)Cd units unsymmetrical. This also leads to two different Cd⋯Cd distances with Cd1⋯Cd1i being 3.6812 (4) Å while the Cd1⋯Cd1ii separation is 3.7432 (4) Å (Fig. 1[link]).

Table 1
Selected geometric parameters (Å, °)

Cd1—N1 2.293 (3) Cd1—N4 2.332 (2)
Cd1—N9 2.330 (2) Cd1—N1i 2.394 (3)
Cd1—N7 2.330 (2) Cd1—N4ii 2.436 (3)
       
N1—Cd1—N9 158.28 (9) N7—Cd1—N1i 100.49 (10)
N1—Cd1—N7 94.44 (10) N4—Cd1—N1i 99.89 (10)
N9—Cd1—N7 80.59 (9) N1—Cd1—N4ii 102.19 (10)
N1—Cd1—N4 95.09 (10) N9—Cd1—N4ii 98.22 (9)
N9—Cd1—N4 96.82 (9) N7—Cd1—N4ii 83.17 (9)
N7—Cd1—N4 159.02 (9) N4—Cd1—N4ii 76.57 (10)
N1—Cd1—N1i 76.52 (11) N1i—Cd1—N4ii 176.17 (9)
N9—Cd1—N1i 83.57 (9)    
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The coordination sphere of the metal ion in (I) with 50% probability ellipsoids. Symmetry codes: (i) −x + 1, −y + 1, −z + 1; (ii) −x + 2, −y + 1, −z + 1.

3. Supra­molecular features

In the crystal, the cis position of the bridging azide ligands leads to the formation of zigzag chains built up from Cd(μ2(N3)2)Cd units extending along the a-axis direction, which are connected by N8—H8⋯N6 hydrogen bonds (Table 2[link]) into layers lying parallel to the ac plane (Figs. 2[link] and 3[link]).

Table 2
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N8—H8⋯N6iii 0.89 (1) 2.21 (1) 3.086 (4) 174 (4)
Symmetry code: (iii) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
The packing in (I) viewed along the a-axis direction showing end views of several chains. The N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds are depicted by dashed lines and non-inter­acting hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
The packing in (I) viewed along the c-axis direction showing side views of several chains. The N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds are depicted by dashed lines and non-inter­acting hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.

4. Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database [CSD, updated to September 2025 (Groom et al., 2016View full citation)] with the search fragment shown in Fig. 4[link]a gave 65 hits, 21 of which contained coordinated azide ions. Of these, 16 were considered most similar to the title compound while one was monomeric and the remaining four contained exclusively Cd—N=N=N—Cd bridging units. Table 3[link] lists the title compound and the most similar ones with pertinent geometric details. The compounds with refcodes FEBKED to UMUSUS contain a chelating ligand similar to that in the title compound so that the two Cd(μ2(N3)2)Cd units are cis to one another and unsymmetrically bridged as well. The Cd—N distances are comparable although the short–long pattern is not always in the same order. Except for OWOGAK, which has two different Cd⋯Cd separations as is the case with the title mol­ecule, the Cd⋯Cd separations are equivalent by symmetry. For FARZEF, FARZIJ and TERHUT, pairs of Cd ions are bridged either by one μ2;η1-N3 ion and one μ3;η1-N3 ion or by two μ3;η1-N3 ions. Here, the Cd—N distances to the μ2;η1-N3 ion are comparable to the shorter ones seen in (I) but those to the μ3;η1-N3 grouping are noticeably longer as expected. The last group contains Cd(μ2(N3)2)Cd units which are trans to one another but the bridging units are still unsymmetrical except for GOYROD where site symmetry requires them to be symmetrical.

Table 3
Inter­atomic distances in Cd(μ-N3)2 units

REFCODE a1 b1 c1 d1 e1 f1 Reference
(I) 2.394 (3) 2.293 (3) 2.332 (2) 2.436 (3) 3.6812 (4) 3.7432 (4) This work
FEBKED 2.334 (2) 2.399 (2) 2.399 (2) 2.334 (2) 307917 (9) 3.7917 (9) He & Lu (2004View full citation)
FEBKED01 2.312 (3) 2.422 (3) 2.422 (3) 2.312 (3) 3.7728 (2) 3.7728 (2) Abu-Youssef 2005View full citation
OWOGAK 2.445 (2) 2.300 (2) 2.2811 (19) 2.3610 (18) 3.7266 (2) 3.7871 (2) Marandi et al. (2016View full citation)
QUXZOZ 2.411 (2) 2.303 (2) 2.303 (2) 2.411 (2) 3.7643 (4) 3.7728 (2) Chen et al. (2010View full citation)
UMUSUS 2.367 (4) 2.322 (5) 2.323 (5) 2.367 (4) 3.6327 (9) 3.6327 (9) Wan et al. (2016View full citation)
               
FARZEF 2.283 (6) 2.490 (5)2 2.408 (4)2 2.326 (6) 3.7351 (6) 3.6992 (7) Machura et al. (2012View full citation)
FARZIJ 2.278 (6) 2.376 (4)2 2.396 (5)2 2.252 (5) 3.6763 (10) 3.6432 (10) Machura et al. (2012View full citation)
TEPHUT 2.283 (4) 2.439 (4)2 2.471 (3)2 2.314 (4) 3.6146 (5) 3.7018 (5) Bai et al. (2013View full citation)
               
GIWYER 2.371 (2) 2.351 (2) 2.351 (2) 2.371 (2) 3.6935 (11) 3.6935 (11) Goher et al. (2008View full citation)
GIWYIV 2.369 (5) 2.312 (4) 2.355 (6) 2.326 (5) 3.5665 (19) 3.5516 (19) Goher et al. (2008View full citation)
GOYROB 2.3441 (18) 2.3421 (17) 2.3421 (17) 2.3441 (18) 3.5298 (3) 3.5298 (3) Mautner et al. (2015View full citation)
KABSUB 2.411 (3) 2.308 (2) 2.411 (3) 2.308 (2) 3.6267 (2) 3.6267 (2) Yang et al. (2010View full citation)
WUBSIV 2.359 (6) 2.329 (6) 2.329 (6) 2.585 (6) 3.7050 (16) 3.9291 (16) Goher et al. (2002View full citation)
Notes: (1) see Fig. 4[link]b for key; (2) distance to μ3-N3 ion.
[Figure 4]
Figure 4
(a) The search fragment used where ‘Any' refers to any bond type (single, double or delocalized) in the CSD search, and (B) the key for column headings in Table 3[link].

5. Hirshfeld surface analysis

A Hirshfeld surface (HS) analysis was performed using CrystalExplorer (Spackman et al., 2021View full citation) to explore the inter­molecular inter­actions in the crystal of (I). Descriptions and inter­pretations of the plots obtained have been published (Tan et al., 2019View full citation). The dnorm HS for a portion of one chain is shown in Fig. 5[link] with the bright red spots on the right side showing the sites of N—Cd bonds that continue the chain. The red spots on the top of the surface indicate the locations of the N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds, which connect the chains. Fig. 6[link] shows the two-dimensional fingerprint plots with Fig. 6[link]a showing all inter­molecular inter­actions. This is characterized by two pairs of sharp peaks and a broader central one. Delineation of these into specific atom⋯atom inter­actions shows the central peak to represent H⋯H inter­actions at 37.2% of the total and the pair with tips at de + di ≃ 2.2 Å (Fig. 6[link]c) consistent with the N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds at 38.0% of the total. The C⋯H/H⋯C inter­actions constitute 18.3% of the total and appear as a pair of broad peaks at de + di ≃ 3 Å (Fig. 6[link]d). These do not appear to represent any specific inter­actions as calculations of inter­molecular distances do not show any C—H⋯π(ring) inter­actions to be present. Finally, the pair of sharp peaks with de + di ≃ 2.4 Å (Fig. 6[link]e) can be attributed to the Cd—N bonds mentioned above that continue the chain beyond that fragment used in the calculation of the HS.

[Figure 5]
Figure 5
The dnorm Hirshfeld surface for (I).
[Figure 6]
Figure 6
Two-dimensional fingerprint plots for (I) showing all inter­actions (a) and those delineated into H⋯H (b), N⋯H/H⋯N (c), C⋯H/H⋯C (d) and Cd—N (e) inter­actions.

6. Synthesis and crystallization

The title compound was prepared under solvothermal conditions from a mixture of cadmium(II) nitrate tetra­hydrate (62 mg, 0.20 mmol), 2,2′-di­pyridyl­amine (17 mg, 0.10 mmol), sodium azide (26 mg, 0.40 mmol), N,N-di­methyl­formamide (10 ml) and water (7 ml), which was sonicated for 30min. Then the reaction mixture was transferred to a Teflon-lined stainless steel reactor and heated to 403 K for 2 days. After cooling to room temperature at a rate of 10 K h−1, colourless block-shaped crystals of (I) were collected.

7. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 4[link]. The N-bound H atom was located in a difference map and its position was freely refined. The C-bound H atoms were located geometrically (C—H = 0.93 Å) and refined as riding atoms.

Table 4
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula [Cd(N3)3(C10H9N3)]
Mr 367.66
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K) 298
a, b, c (Å) 6.6655 (5), 18.5106 (17), 10.5746 (9)
β (°) 93.612 (3)
V3) 1302.13 (19)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 1.68
Crystal size (mm) 0.34 × 0.21 × 0.17
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker D8 Quest PHOTON 100 CCD
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015View full citation)
Tmin, Tmax 0.796, 0.877
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 64159, 6322, 5357
Rint 0.050
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.835
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.055, 0.096, 1.37
No. of reflections 6322
No. of parameters 185
No. of restraints 1
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 1.19, −1.10
Computer programs: APEX4 and SAINT (Bruker, 2018View full citation), SHELXT2014/5 (Sheldrick, 2015aView full citation), SHELXL2019/3 (Sheldrick, 2015bView full citation), DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2012View full citation), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008View full citation) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010View full citation).

Supporting information


Computing details top

catena-Poly[[[bis(pyridin-2-yl)amine]cadmium(II)]-di-µ2-azido] top
Crystal data top
[Cd(N3)3(C10H9N3)]F(000) = 720
Mr = 367.66Dx = 1.875 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 6.6655 (5) ÅCell parameters from 9995 reflections
b = 18.5106 (17) Åθ = 3.0–32.3°
c = 10.5746 (9) ŵ = 1.68 mm1
β = 93.612 (3)°T = 298 K
V = 1302.13 (19) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.34 × 0.21 × 0.17 mm
Data collection top
Bruker D8 Quest PHOTON 100 CCD
diffractometer
5357 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ and ω scansRint = 0.050
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
θmax = 36.4°, θmin = 2.9°
Tmin = 0.796, Tmax = 0.877h = 118
64159 measured reflectionsk = 3030
6322 independent reflectionsl = 1717
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.055Hydrogen site location: mixed
wR(F2) = 0.096H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.37 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + 2.1586P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
6322 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
185 parametersΔρmax = 1.19 e Å3
1 restraintΔρmin = 1.10 e Å3
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. H-atoms attached to carbon were placed in calculated positions (C—H = 0.95 Å) and were included as riding contributions with isotropic displacement parameters 1.2 times those of the attached atoms. That attached to nitrogen was placed in a location derived from a difference map and refined with a DFIX 0.89 0.01 instruction

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Cd10.75506 (3)0.49321 (2)0.57654 (2)0.03175 (6)
N10.5582 (4)0.56986 (17)0.4517 (3)0.0413 (6)
N20.6135 (4)0.60430 (14)0.3655 (3)0.0355 (5)
N30.6614 (6)0.6371 (2)0.2803 (3)0.0616 (9)
N40.9227 (4)0.44425 (16)0.4095 (2)0.0366 (5)
N50.8521 (4)0.43719 (15)0.3032 (2)0.0342 (5)
N60.7900 (5)0.4295 (2)0.2006 (3)0.0570 (9)
N70.7069 (4)0.55560 (14)0.7636 (2)0.0339 (5)
N80.7629 (5)0.46074 (16)0.9133 (2)0.0414 (6)
H80.762 (6)0.454 (2)0.9962 (11)0.045 (11)*
N90.8345 (4)0.40164 (14)0.7223 (2)0.0323 (5)
C40.6731 (6)0.6269 (2)0.7451 (4)0.0472 (8)
H40.6563670.6435230.6621420.057*
C50.6618 (7)0.6763 (2)0.8408 (4)0.0566 (10)
H50.6384130.7249200.8232530.068*
C60.6862 (6)0.6517 (2)0.9641 (4)0.0553 (10)
H60.6796350.6837071.0315170.066*
C70.7197 (5)0.5804 (2)0.9861 (3)0.0447 (7)
H70.7358250.5631571.0686610.054*
C80.7299 (4)0.53278 (17)0.8829 (3)0.0329 (5)
C90.7960 (4)0.39917 (17)0.8450 (3)0.0332 (6)
C100.7921 (7)0.3336 (2)0.9106 (3)0.0513 (9)
H100.7648130.3330590.9957470.062*
C110.8280 (8)0.2708 (2)0.8499 (4)0.0619 (11)
H110.8237480.2269570.8927130.074*
C120.8711 (7)0.2726 (2)0.7232 (4)0.0566 (10)
H120.8980210.2304310.6793910.068*
C130.8726 (6)0.3382 (2)0.6654 (3)0.0467 (8)
H130.9020130.3395220.5805670.056*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Cd10.02633 (9)0.04938 (12)0.01945 (8)0.00229 (9)0.00072 (6)0.00442 (8)
N10.0259 (11)0.0631 (18)0.0341 (13)0.0045 (11)0.0051 (9)0.0172 (12)
N20.0291 (11)0.0394 (13)0.0372 (13)0.0044 (9)0.0038 (9)0.0049 (10)
N30.062 (2)0.070 (2)0.053 (2)0.0140 (18)0.0035 (16)0.0210 (17)
N40.0270 (11)0.0641 (17)0.0191 (9)0.0058 (11)0.0044 (8)0.0026 (10)
N50.0303 (11)0.0491 (14)0.0236 (10)0.0058 (10)0.0051 (8)0.0022 (9)
N60.0508 (18)0.095 (3)0.0247 (13)0.0106 (17)0.0029 (12)0.0051 (14)
N70.0343 (12)0.0438 (13)0.0242 (10)0.0019 (10)0.0063 (9)0.0015 (9)
N80.0583 (18)0.0509 (15)0.0151 (10)0.0058 (13)0.0025 (10)0.0018 (9)
N90.0336 (12)0.0432 (13)0.0199 (9)0.0037 (10)0.0003 (8)0.0015 (8)
C40.051 (2)0.0485 (19)0.0424 (18)0.0033 (15)0.0094 (15)0.0066 (14)
C50.064 (3)0.0426 (19)0.064 (3)0.0026 (17)0.013 (2)0.0035 (17)
C60.057 (2)0.059 (2)0.050 (2)0.0026 (18)0.0113 (18)0.0211 (18)
C70.0459 (18)0.060 (2)0.0286 (14)0.0002 (15)0.0059 (13)0.0081 (13)
C80.0283 (12)0.0488 (16)0.0219 (11)0.0007 (11)0.0043 (9)0.0042 (10)
C90.0322 (13)0.0451 (16)0.0216 (11)0.0021 (11)0.0029 (9)0.0033 (10)
C100.070 (3)0.055 (2)0.0283 (15)0.0042 (18)0.0020 (15)0.0111 (14)
C110.088 (3)0.045 (2)0.051 (2)0.005 (2)0.011 (2)0.0118 (17)
C120.076 (3)0.0447 (19)0.047 (2)0.0089 (18)0.0083 (19)0.0075 (16)
C130.058 (2)0.0513 (19)0.0302 (15)0.0069 (16)0.0013 (14)0.0050 (13)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Cd1—N12.293 (3)C4—C51.369 (5)
Cd1—N92.330 (2)C4—H40.9300
Cd1—N72.330 (2)C5—C61.382 (6)
Cd1—N42.332 (2)C5—H50.9300
Cd1—N1i2.394 (3)C6—C71.355 (6)
Cd1—N4ii2.436 (3)C6—H60.9300
N1—N21.190 (4)C7—C81.408 (4)
N2—N31.148 (4)C7—H70.9300
N4—N51.199 (3)C9—C101.399 (5)
N5—N61.145 (4)C10—C111.357 (6)
N7—C81.330 (4)C10—H100.9300
N7—C41.352 (4)C11—C121.389 (6)
N8—C91.375 (4)C11—H110.9300
N8—C81.386 (4)C12—C131.361 (5)
N8—H80.885 (10)C12—H120.9300
N9—C91.339 (3)C13—H130.9300
N9—C131.351 (4)
N1—Cd1—N9158.28 (9)C13—N9—Cd1112.2 (2)
N1—Cd1—N794.44 (10)N7—C4—C5124.2 (4)
N9—Cd1—N780.59 (9)N7—C4—H4117.9
N1—Cd1—N495.09 (10)C5—C4—H4117.9
N9—Cd1—N496.82 (9)C4—C5—C6117.9 (4)
N7—Cd1—N4159.02 (9)C4—C5—H5121.0
N1—Cd1—N1i76.52 (11)C6—C5—H5121.0
N9—Cd1—N1i83.57 (9)C7—C6—C5119.4 (3)
N7—Cd1—N1i100.49 (10)C7—C6—H6120.3
N4—Cd1—N1i99.89 (10)C5—C6—H6120.3
N1—Cd1—N4ii102.19 (10)C6—C7—C8119.5 (3)
N9—Cd1—N4ii98.22 (9)C6—C7—H7120.2
N7—Cd1—N4ii83.17 (9)C8—C7—H7120.2
N4—Cd1—N4ii76.57 (10)N7—C8—N8122.2 (3)
N1i—Cd1—N4ii176.17 (9)N7—C8—C7121.8 (3)
N2—N1—Cd1125.4 (2)N8—C8—C7115.9 (3)
N2—N1—Cd1i118.4 (2)N9—C9—N8121.8 (3)
Cd1—N1—Cd1i103.48 (11)N9—C9—C10121.4 (3)
N3—N2—N1178.0 (3)N8—C9—C10116.8 (3)
N5—N4—Cd1125.1 (2)C11—C10—C9120.0 (3)
N5—N4—Cd1ii113.66 (19)C11—C10—H10120.0
Cd1—N4—Cd1ii103.43 (10)C9—C10—H10120.0
N6—N5—N4177.9 (4)C10—C11—C12119.3 (4)
C8—N7—C4117.1 (3)C10—C11—H11120.4
C8—N7—Cd1129.3 (2)C12—C11—H11120.4
C4—N7—Cd1113.1 (2)C13—C12—C11117.6 (4)
C9—N8—C8134.7 (2)C13—C12—H12121.2
C9—N8—H8115 (3)C11—C12—H12121.2
C8—N8—H8111 (2)N9—C13—C12124.7 (3)
C9—N9—C13117.1 (3)N9—C13—H13117.7
C9—N9—Cd1128.1 (2)C12—C13—H13117.7
C8—N7—C4—C50.2 (5)C13—N9—C9—N8177.4 (3)
Cd1—N7—C4—C5172.7 (3)Cd1—N9—C9—N822.4 (4)
N7—C4—C5—C60.1 (6)C13—N9—C9—C101.1 (5)
C4—C5—C6—C70.1 (6)Cd1—N9—C9—C10159.0 (3)
C5—C6—C7—C80.2 (6)C8—N8—C9—N911.1 (6)
C4—N7—C8—N8179.2 (3)C8—N8—C9—C10170.3 (4)
Cd1—N7—C8—N89.2 (4)N9—C9—C10—C110.1 (6)
C4—N7—C8—C70.0 (4)N8—C9—C10—C11178.5 (4)
Cd1—N7—C8—C7171.5 (2)C9—C10—C11—C120.9 (7)
C9—N8—C8—N76.0 (6)C10—C11—C12—C130.8 (7)
C9—N8—C8—C7174.7 (4)C9—N9—C13—C121.2 (6)
C6—C7—C8—N70.2 (5)Cd1—N9—C13—C12162.0 (3)
C6—C7—C8—N8179.5 (3)C11—C12—C13—N90.2 (7)
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y+1, z+1; (ii) x+2, y+1, z+1.
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N8—H8···N6iii0.89 (1)2.21 (1)3.086 (4)174 (4)
Symmetry code: (iii) x, y, z+1.
Interatomic distances in Cd(µ-N3)2 units top
REFCODEa1b1c1d1e1f1Reference
(I)2.394 (3)2.293 (3)2.332 (2)2.436 (3)3.6812 (4)3.7432 (4)This work
FEBKED2.334 (2)2.399 (2)2.399 (2)2.334 (2)307917 (9)3.7917 (9)He & Lu (2004)
FEBKED012.312 (3)2.422 (3)2.422 (3)2.312 (3)3.7728 (2)3.7728 (2)Abu-Youssef 2005
OWOGAK2.445 (2)2.300 (2)2.2811 (19)2.3610 (18)3.7266 (2)3.7871 (2)Marandi et al. (2016)
QUXZOZ2.411 (2)2.303 (2)2.303 (2)2.411 (2)3.7643 (4)3.7728 (2)Chen et al. (2010)
UMUSUS2.367 (4)2.322 (5)2.323 (5)2.367 (4)3.6327 (9)3.6327 (9)Wan et al. (2016)
FARZEF2.283 (6)2.490 (5)22.408 (4)22.326 (6)3.7351 (6)3.6992 (7)Machura et al. (2012)
FARZIJ2.278 (6)2.376 (4)22.396 (5)22.252 (5)3.6763 (10)3.6432 (10)Machura et al. (2012)
TEPHUT2.283 (4)2.439 (4)22.471 (3)22.314 (4)3.6146 (5)3.7018 (5)Bai et al. (2013)
GIWYER2.371 (2)2.351 (2)2.351 (2)2.371 (2)3.6935 (11)3.6935 (11)Goher et al. (2008)
GIWYIV2.369 (5)2.312 (4)2.355 (6)2.326 (5)3.5665 (19)3.5516 (19)Goher et al. (2008)
GOYROB2.3441 (18)2.3421 (17)2.3421 (17)2.3441 (18)3.5298 (3)3.5298 (3)Mautner et al. (2015)
KABSUB2.411 (3)2.308 (2)2.411 (3)2.308 (2)3.6267 (2)3.6267 (2)Yang et al. (2010)
WUBSIV2.359 (6)2.329 (6)2.329 (6)2.585 (6)3.7050 (16)3.9291 (16)Goher et al. (2002)
Notes: (1) see Fig. 4b for key; (2) distance to µ3-N3 ion.
 

Acknowledgements

The Small Mol­ecule Crystallography Center of ETH Zurich is thanked for its support for the XRD data collection.

Funding information

Funding for this research was provided by: the Algerian MESRS (Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research); the Algerian DGRSDT (Directorate General for Scientific Research and Technological Development); and the PRFU project (grant No. B00L01UN190120230003).

References

Return to citationAbu-Youssef, M. A. M. (2005). J. Coord. Chem. 58, 1377–1386.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationAddala, A., Poupon, M., Bernès, S., Kürkçüoğlu, G. S., Liu, X., Lehchili, F., Kučeráková, M., Dušek, M., Setifi, F., Setifi, Z. & Reedijk, J. (2019). Polyhedron 170, 271–277.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationBai, S.-Q., Fang, C.-J., He, Z., Gao, E.-Q., Yan, C. & Hor, T. S. A. (2013). CrystEngComm 15, 650–653.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationBenamara, N., Setifi, Z., Yang, C.-I., Bernès, S., Geiger, D. K., Kürkçüoğlu, G. S., Setifi, F. & Reedijk, J. (2021). Magnetochemistry 7, 50.  Google Scholar
Return to citationBrandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2012). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.  Google Scholar
Return to citationBruker (2018). APEX4 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
Return to citationChen, F., Zheng, F.-K., Liu, G.-N., Wu, M.-F. & Guo, G.-C. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, m758.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationGoher, M. A. S., Mautner, F. A., Abu-Youssef, M. A. M., Hafez, A. K. & Badr, A. M.-A. (2002). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 3309–3312.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationGoher, M. A. S., Mautner, F. A., Gatterer, K., Abu-Youssef, M. A. M., Badr, A. M. A., Sodin, B. & Gspan, C. (2008). J. Mol. Struct. 876, 199–205.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationGroom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationHe, X. & Lu, C.-Z. (2004). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 630, 2583–2586.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKrause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationLiu, B., Zhou, H.-F., Hou, L., Wang, J.-P., Wang, Y.-Y. & Zhu, Z. (2016). Inorg. Chem. 55, 8871–8880.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationMachura, B., Nawrot, I. & Michalik, K. (2012). Polyhedron 31, 548–557.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMajumder, I., Chakraborty, P., Dasgupta, S., Massera, C., Escudero, D. & Das, D. (2017). Inorg. Chem. 56, 12893–12901.  CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationMarandi, F., Moeini, K. & Rudbari, H. A. (2016). Z. Naturforsch. B 71, 959–965.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMautner, F. A., Scherzer, M., Berger, C., Fischer, R. C., Vicente, R. & Massoud, S. S. (2015). Polyhedron 85, 329–336.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMerabet, L., Setifi, Z., Ferjani, H., Geiger, D. K., Glidewell, C., Kanmazalp, S. D., Setifi, F. & Kaboub, L. (2023). J. Chem. Crystallogr. 53, 209–216.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationMerabet, L., Vologzhanina, A. V., Setifi, Z., Kaboub, L. & Setifi, F. (2022). CrystEngComm 24, 4740–4747.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationRoy, S., Harms, K., Bauzá, A., Frontera, A. & Chattopadhyay, S. (2017). Polyhedron 121, 199–205.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationSetifi, Z., Setifi, F., Geiger, D. K., Maris, T., Aljerf, L. & Glidewell, C. (2025). Acta Cryst. E81, 977–981.  CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSetifi, Z., Zambon, D., Setifi, F., El-Ghozzi, M., Mahiou, R. & Glidewell, C. (2017). Acta Cryst. C73, 674–681.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSpackman, P. R., Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2021). J. Appl. Cryst. 54, 1006–1011.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationTan, S. L., Jotani, M. M. & Tiekink, E. R. T. (2019). Acta Cryst. E75, 308–318.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationWan, J., Cai, S.-L., Zhang, K., Li, C.-J., Feng, Y., Fan, J., Zheng, S.-R. & Zhang, W.-G. (2016). CrystEngComm 18, 5164–5176.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationYang, E.-C., Shi, X.-J., Liu, Z.-Y. & Zhao, X.-Z. (2010). Inorg. Chem. Commun. 13, 733–736.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds