research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Synthesis and structure of a 1:1 1-phenyl­semicarbazide–1-phenyl­pyrazolidin-3-one cocrystal

crossmark logo

aDepartment of Chemistry, Sree Narayana College, Varkala, India, bDepartment of Chemistry, Mahatma Gandhi College, Thiruvananthapuram, India, cDepartment of Chemistry, All Saints' College, Thiruvananthapuram, India, dDepartment of Chemical Oceanography, Lake Side Campus, Cochin University of Science & Technology, Kochi, India, and eDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Eastern University, Sri Lanka, Chenkalady, Sri Lanka
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

Edited by W. T. A. Harrison, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom (Received 16 February 2026; accepted 10 March 2026; online 17 March 2026)

The title cocrystal, C7H9N3O·C9H10N2O, was obtained by the cocrystallization of 1-phenyl­semicarbazide (A) and 1-phenyl­pyrazolidin-3-one (B) in a 1:1 molar ratio from methanol solution. The structure features a gauche arrangement about the N—N bond in the semicarbazide fragment and a twisted conformation of the pyrazolidinone ring. In the extended structure, the mol­ecules are linked by AA and BA N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, supplemented by C—H⋯π contacts to generate a three-dimensional supra­molecular framework.

1. Chemical context

Semicarbazide (CH5N3O) is the di­amino derivative of urea and contains three N atoms and a carbonyl group as potential hydrogen-bonding sites and for coordination with metal centers (Asifa et al., 2021View full citation). It forms semicarbazones on condensation with aldehydes/ketone (Reena et al., 2008View full citation; Reena & Kurup, 2010View full citation). Consequently, semicarbazide and its derivatives have found extensive utility in the synthesis of compounds with biological and industrial relevance. Beyond its biological applications, semicarbazide derivatives have also been reported to act as effective corrosion inhibitors in aqueous environments (Olasunkanmi et al., 2020View full citation).

In the field of crystal engineering, cocrystals defined as single-phase crystalline materials comprising two or more neutral mol­ecular species have long been exploited to tune physicochemical attributes while preserving the mol­ecular identity of active components (Taylor & Day, 2018View full citation). A recent review reaffirms that cocrystallization remains a powerful approach to modulate API properties, with modern design strategies expanding via techniques such as spray drying, hot-melt extrusion and supercritical fluid processing (Sakhiya & Borkhataria 2024View full citation). Rode and colleagues demonstrated the potential of flavonoid-based cocrystal and coamorphous systems (Rode et al., 2024View full citation).

[Scheme 1]

As part of our studies in this area, we now describe the synthesis and structure of the title 1:1 cocrystal formed between 1-phenyl­semicarbazide (A) and 1-phenyl­pyrazolidin-3-one (B), C7H9N3O·C9H10N2O, (I), Fig. 1[link].

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The mol­ecular structure of (I) with displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.

2. Structural commentary

The semicarbazide–aromatic linkage in mol­ecule A of (I) displays a pronounced deviation from coplanarity, as shown by the C1—N2—N3—C2 torsion angle of −99.2 (2)°, indicating a gauche arrangement about the N—N bond. The O1—C1—N2—N3 torsion of 177.2 (1)° confirms an anti-periplanar relationship between the carbonyl oxygen atom and the N—N linkage, while the N1—C1—N2—N3 torsion angle of −1.9 (2)° supports near planarity at C1 and sp2 hybridization at N1. In the side chain, C3—C2—N3—N2 [−167.0 (1)°] is close to anti-periplanar, whereas C7—C2—N3—N2 [17.9 (2)°] indicates a gauche disposition of the phenyl substituent.

The pyrazolidinone ring (C8–C10/N4/N5) in mol­ecule B adopts a twisted conformation about C10—C9, with Cremer–Pople parameters Q(2) = 0.229 (2) Å and Φ(2) = 263.7 (5)°. The pseudorotation parameters P = 65.5 (4)° and τM = 23.9 (2)° (Jia et al., 2008View full citation) confirm this geometry. The mean absolute torsion angle (17.6°) and atomic deviations in the ring (–0.142 to +0.132 Å) indicate moderate non-planarity, in line with reported pyrazolidinone structures (Domenicano et al., 1975View full citation). The pyrazolidinone and phenyl (C11–C16) rings are inclined by 54.42 (12)°, producing a significant out-of-plane arrangement.

3. Supra­molecular features

The extended structure of (I) features an extensive network of inter­molecular inter­actions, including N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Table 1[link]) and C—H⋯π contacts, which collectively underpin its efficient packing and structural cohesion.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg2 and Cg3 are the centroids of the C11–C16 and C2–C7 rings, respectively

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N1—H1B⋯O1i 0.93 (2) 2.09 (2) 3.0164 (17) 178 (2)
N1—H1A⋯O2ii 0.87 (2) 2.12 (2) 2.9645 (18) 161 (2)
N2—H2N⋯O1iii 0.88 (2) 2.09 (2) 2.9486 (17) 166 (2)
N3—H3N⋯O2iii 0.84 (2) 2.15 (2) 2.9641 (19) 161 (2)
N4—H4N⋯O1 0.88 (2) 2.08 (2) 2.9471 (19) 167 (2)
C4—H4⋯Cg2iv 0.93 2.77 3.653 (3) 158
C9—H9BCg3v 0.97 2.64 3.510 (2) 149
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation; (iii) Mathematical equation; (iv) Mathematical equation; (v) Mathematical equation.

Five significant hydrogen bonds were identified, featuring donor–acceptor (DA) distances shorter than 3.05 Å. These hydrogen bonds all involve N—H donors and carbonyl oxygen atom acceptors (Fig. 2[link]): the strong, near-linear inter­actions such as N1—H1B⋯O1 and N4—H4N⋯O1 are consistent with hydrogen-bonding motifs typical of semicarbazide-based structures, contributing to a well-defined supra­molecular framework (Kurup et al., 2011View full citation; Kunnath et al., 2026View full citation).

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Hydrogen bonds in the crystal packing of (I) shown as dashed lines.

Complementing these, C—H⋯π inter­actions consolidate the structure: these inter­actions were identified by short hydrogen-to-centroid distances (< 3.0 Å) and favorable angular geometries (Desiraju & Steiner, 1999View full citation). Two notable C—H⋯π contacts include C4—H4⋯Cg2 with an H⋯Cg distance of 2.77 Å and C9—H9BCg3 with a shorter H⋯Cg distance of 2.64 Å. The latter exhibits a more linear approach, facilitating an effective perpendicular hydrogen-bonding inter­action to the π-system (Mahadevi & Sastry, 2016View full citation). These C—H⋯π contacts further enhance the cohesion of the structure of (I) but there are no significant ππ inter­actions present in the crystal (Fig. 3[link]).

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
The packing of (I) viewed down [100].

4. Hirshfeld surface analysis

Hirshfeld surface analysis and the associated two-dimensional fingerprint plots were generated using CrystalExplorer (Spackman et al., 2021View full citation). The Hirshfeld surfaces were mapped over the normalized contact distance (dnorm), shape index, curvedness, and fragment patches for both the 1-phenyl­semicarbazide and 1-phenyl­pyrazolidin-3-one components (see supplementary Figure). The dnorm surfaces of both mol­ecules exhibit bright-red spots that signify close inter­molecular contacts (shorter than the sum of van der Waals radii). For the 1-phenyl­semicarbazide moiety, these red regions are concentrated around the amine donors (N1, N2) and the carbonyl acceptor (O1). Similarly, the 1-phenyl­pyrazolidin-3-one surface shows deep-red depressions near the N4 donor and O2 acceptor atoms. These features confirm the presence of the strong N—H⋯O hydrogen bonding network identified in the crystal structure analysis.

The two-dimensional fingerprint plots (Fig. 4[link]) provide a qu­anti­tative comparison of the inter­molecular inter­actions for the two distinct units. The surface of A is dominated by H⋯H contacts (47.6%), followed by C⋯H/H⋯C contacts (24.1%), which correspond to the C—H⋯π inter­actions. The O⋯H/H⋯O inter­actions, representing the strong hydrogen bonds, make a significant contribution of 23.5% and appear as sharp, distinct spikes. In B, a higher dominance of H⋯H contacts (54.7%) can be seen and a similar contribution from C⋯H/H⋯C inter­actions (25.7%). However, the O⋯H/H⋯O inter­actions contribute less (13.3%) compared to the semicarbazide unit.

[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Two-dimensional fingerprint plots for (a) 1-phenyl­semicarbazide and (b) 1-phenyl­pyrazolidin-3-one, delineated into specific inter­molecular contacts with their percentage contributions to the Hirshfeld surface area.

5. Synthesis and crystallization

Compound (I) was formed by mixing equimolar qu­anti­ties of 1-phenyl­semicarbazide (0.1512 g, 1 mmol) and 1-phenyl­pyrazolidin-3-one (0.1621 g, 1 mmol) in methanol (20 ml) and refluxing with stirring until a clear solution was obtained. The hot solution was filtered to remove any insoluble material and allowed to cool slowly to room temperature. Brown block-shaped crystals of (I) were obtained after slow evaporation of the solvent over several days.

FT IR (cm−1) 3291 (N—H stretch); 3190 (aromatic C—H stretch); 1693 (amine N—H stretch); 1663 (C=O stretch); 1427 (pyrazolidinone C=N stretch); 1282 (aromatic C=N stretch); 1024 (semicarbazide N—N stretch). The red shift for the C=O bond from its typical position substanti­ates the hydrogen bonding in the cocrystal (Siji et al., 2010aView full citation,bView full citation). UV/visible (methanol), 245 and 287 nm due to ππ* transitions of the aromatic rings. For figures of the IR, UV/visible and 1H and 13C NMR spectra of (I), see supporting information.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2[link]. The N-bound hydrogen atoms were located in difference maps and freely refined. The C-bound H atoms were placed geometrically and refined using a riding model.

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula C7H9N3O·C9H10N2O
Mr 313.36
Crystal system, space group Triclinic, PMathematical equation
Temperature (K) 304
a, b, c (Å) 7.3651 (6), 8.8906 (5), 13.3791 (10)
α, β, γ (°) 76.121 (2), 88.579 (3), 73.108 (2)
V3) 812.84 (10)
Z 2
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.09
Crystal size (mm) 0.35 × 0.21 × 0.09
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker D8 Venture Diffractometer
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015View full citation)
Tmin, Tmax 0.535, 0.745
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 32158, 3069, 2566
Rint 0.063
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.609
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.045, 0.123, 1.06
No. of reflections 3063
No. of parameters 223
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.22, −0.26
Computer programs: APEX4 and SAINT (Bruker, 2021View full citation), SHELXT2018/2 (Sheldrick, 2015aView full citation), SHELXL2019/3 (Sheldrick, 2015bView full citation), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012View full citation), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2020View full citation) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010View full citation).

Supporting information


Computing details top

1-Phenylsemicarbazide–1-phenylpyrazolidin-3-one (1/1) top
Crystal data top
C7H9N3O·C9H10N2OZ = 2
Mr = 313.36F(000) = 332
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.280 Mg m3
a = 7.3651 (6) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 8.8906 (5) ÅCell parameters from 9264 reflections
c = 13.3791 (10) Åθ = 2.6–25.6°
α = 76.121 (2)°µ = 0.09 mm1
β = 88.579 (3)°T = 304 K
γ = 73.108 (2)°Block, brown
V = 812.84 (10) Å30.35 × 0.21 × 0.09 mm
Data collection top
Bruker D8 Venture Diffractometer2566 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Radiation source: fine focus sealed tubeRint = 0.063
φ and ω scansθmax = 25.7°, θmin = 2.9°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
h = 88
Tmin = 0.535, Tmax = 0.745k = 1010
32158 measured reflectionsl = 1616
3069 independent reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.123 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0602P)2 + 0.2037P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.06(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
3063 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.22 e Å3
223 parametersΔρmin = 0.26 e Å3
0 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.2118 (2)0.60592 (16)0.52900 (10)0.0311 (3)
C20.0439 (2)0.79617 (18)0.69126 (12)0.0372 (3)
C30.1379 (2)0.9337 (2)0.72492 (14)0.0498 (4)
H30.1978691.0297650.6772280.060*
C40.1425 (2)0.9279 (3)0.82926 (16)0.0589 (5)
H40.2064281.0202720.8511050.071*
C50.0538 (3)0.7872 (3)0.90105 (15)0.0577 (5)
H50.0563670.7843480.9710040.069*
C60.0385 (3)0.6513 (2)0.86799 (15)0.0544 (5)
H60.0986170.5558510.9161450.065*
C70.0435 (2)0.6540 (2)0.76410 (14)0.0455 (4)
H70.1054330.5604280.7430410.055*
C80.3195 (2)0.0381 (2)0.66850 (14)0.0480 (4)
C90.3529 (3)0.0688 (2)0.77620 (15)0.0605 (5)
H9A0.4866720.1262780.7913630.073*
H9B0.2815410.1469690.7858070.073*
C100.2827 (4)0.0488 (3)0.84304 (16)0.0755 (7)
H10A0.1528730.0548190.8612300.091*
H10B0.3621100.0161820.9058260.091*
C110.4384 (2)0.26709 (17)0.80707 (12)0.0382 (4)
C120.4607 (3)0.2703 (2)0.90964 (13)0.0470 (4)
H120.3858720.2277170.9589190.056*
C130.5924 (3)0.3359 (2)0.93827 (15)0.0617 (5)
H130.6083610.3350931.0071390.074*
C140.7001 (4)0.4023 (3)0.86646 (17)0.0829 (8)
H140.7888460.4469940.8862010.100*
C150.6767 (3)0.4026 (3)0.76518 (17)0.0762 (7)
H150.7487000.4493600.7161130.091*
C160.5478 (3)0.3346 (2)0.73500 (13)0.0502 (4)
H160.5345710.3341170.6661250.060*
N10.3338 (2)0.68854 (16)0.53556 (11)0.0399 (3)
N20.02993 (19)0.66632 (17)0.55207 (11)0.0439 (3)
N30.02852 (19)0.80919 (16)0.58501 (11)0.0420 (3)
N40.2967 (3)0.18810 (18)0.67682 (12)0.0585 (5)
N50.2939 (2)0.20624 (18)0.77994 (11)0.0529 (4)
O10.25943 (14)0.47328 (12)0.50354 (8)0.0368 (3)
O20.3102 (2)0.00009 (15)0.58679 (10)0.0601 (4)
H1B0.460 (3)0.641 (3)0.5246 (17)0.072*
H1A0.303 (3)0.777 (3)0.5578 (17)0.072*
H2N0.052 (3)0.614 (3)0.5465 (17)0.072*
H3N0.115 (3)0.879 (3)0.5449 (18)0.072*
H4N0.267 (3)0.273 (3)0.6235 (18)0.072*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0351 (8)0.0324 (7)0.0255 (7)0.0095 (6)0.0015 (5)0.0065 (5)
C20.0246 (7)0.0426 (8)0.0471 (9)0.0090 (6)0.0004 (6)0.0171 (7)
C30.0372 (9)0.0512 (10)0.0570 (11)0.0018 (7)0.0051 (7)0.0229 (8)
C40.0397 (9)0.0741 (13)0.0656 (12)0.0020 (9)0.0045 (8)0.0403 (10)
C50.0451 (10)0.0854 (14)0.0469 (10)0.0208 (9)0.0080 (8)0.0224 (10)
C60.0515 (10)0.0601 (11)0.0512 (11)0.0231 (9)0.0024 (8)0.0044 (8)
C70.0422 (9)0.0412 (9)0.0555 (10)0.0134 (7)0.0038 (7)0.0148 (7)
C80.0496 (10)0.0431 (9)0.0544 (10)0.0201 (7)0.0144 (8)0.0077 (7)
C90.0653 (12)0.0539 (11)0.0631 (12)0.0344 (9)0.0157 (9)0.0068 (9)
C100.1078 (18)0.0908 (16)0.0520 (12)0.0705 (15)0.0022 (11)0.0117 (11)
C110.0393 (8)0.0336 (7)0.0391 (8)0.0066 (6)0.0051 (6)0.0085 (6)
C120.0520 (10)0.0540 (10)0.0369 (9)0.0181 (8)0.0031 (7)0.0119 (7)
C130.0833 (14)0.0691 (12)0.0412 (10)0.0337 (11)0.0108 (9)0.0142 (9)
C140.1059 (19)0.1016 (18)0.0610 (13)0.0729 (16)0.0196 (12)0.0022 (12)
C150.0874 (16)0.0977 (17)0.0542 (12)0.0617 (14)0.0031 (11)0.0043 (11)
C160.0622 (11)0.0532 (10)0.0330 (8)0.0192 (8)0.0039 (8)0.0027 (7)
N10.0368 (7)0.0382 (7)0.0507 (8)0.0140 (6)0.0053 (6)0.0184 (6)
N20.0330 (7)0.0478 (8)0.0601 (9)0.0121 (6)0.0026 (6)0.0299 (7)
N30.0386 (7)0.0398 (7)0.0458 (8)0.0013 (6)0.0046 (6)0.0188 (6)
N40.0910 (12)0.0433 (8)0.0427 (8)0.0255 (8)0.0237 (8)0.0035 (6)
N50.0604 (9)0.0597 (9)0.0448 (8)0.0272 (7)0.0093 (7)0.0117 (7)
O10.0369 (6)0.0357 (5)0.0416 (6)0.0114 (4)0.0025 (4)0.0157 (4)
O20.0730 (9)0.0490 (7)0.0625 (8)0.0192 (6)0.0141 (7)0.0182 (6)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
C1—O11.2554 (16)C10—H10A0.9700
C1—N11.3311 (19)C10—H10B0.9700
C1—N21.3489 (19)C11—C161.380 (2)
C2—C71.389 (2)C11—C121.394 (2)
C2—C31.391 (2)C11—N51.416 (2)
C2—N31.403 (2)C12—C131.372 (3)
C3—C41.384 (3)C12—H120.9300
C3—H30.9300C13—C141.365 (3)
C4—C51.376 (3)C13—H130.9300
C4—H40.9300C14—C151.369 (3)
C5—C61.372 (3)C14—H140.9300
C5—H50.9300C15—C161.379 (3)
C6—C71.384 (3)C15—H150.9300
C6—H60.9300C16—H160.9300
C7—H70.9300N1—H1B0.93 (2)
C8—O21.229 (2)N1—H1A0.87 (2)
C8—N41.326 (2)N2—N31.3909 (18)
C8—C91.505 (3)N2—H2N0.88 (2)
C9—C101.508 (3)N3—H3N0.84 (2)
C9—H9A0.9700N4—N51.426 (2)
C9—H9B0.9700N4—H4N0.88 (2)
C10—N51.475 (2)
O1—C1—N1122.83 (13)H10A—C10—H10B108.8
O1—C1—N2118.62 (13)C16—C11—C12118.72 (15)
N1—C1—N2118.54 (13)C16—C11—N5122.61 (15)
C7—C2—C3118.78 (15)C12—C11—N5118.47 (15)
C7—C2—N3122.29 (14)C13—C12—C11120.35 (17)
C3—C2—N3118.76 (15)C13—C12—H12119.8
C4—C3—C2120.15 (17)C11—C12—H12119.8
C4—C3—H3119.9C14—C13—C12120.53 (18)
C2—C3—H3119.9C14—C13—H13119.7
C5—C4—C3120.84 (17)C12—C13—H13119.7
C5—C4—H4119.6C13—C14—C15119.57 (19)
C3—C4—H4119.6C13—C14—H14120.2
C6—C5—C4119.08 (17)C15—C14—H14120.2
C6—C5—H5120.5C14—C15—C16120.87 (19)
C4—C5—H5120.5C14—C15—H15119.6
C5—C6—C7121.05 (17)C16—C15—H15119.6
C5—C6—H6119.5C15—C16—C11119.93 (17)
C7—C6—H6119.5C15—C16—H16120.0
C6—C7—C2120.10 (16)C11—C16—H16120.0
C6—C7—H7119.9C1—N1—H1B117.0 (13)
C2—C7—H7119.9C1—N1—H1A122.8 (14)
O2—C8—N4124.66 (16)H1B—N1—H1A120 (2)
O2—C8—C9128.52 (16)C1—N2—N3120.99 (13)
N4—C8—C9106.80 (16)C1—N2—H2N119.1 (14)
C8—C9—C10103.49 (16)N3—N2—H2N119.9 (15)
C8—C9—H9A111.1N2—N3—C2117.65 (13)
C10—C9—H9A111.1N2—N3—H3N110.9 (15)
C8—C9—H9B111.1C2—N3—H3N118.1 (15)
C10—C9—H9B111.1C8—N4—N5114.89 (15)
H9A—C9—H9B109.0C8—N4—H4N122.9 (14)
N5—C10—C9105.18 (16)N5—N4—H4N121.5 (14)
N5—C10—H10A110.7C11—N5—N4114.65 (14)
C9—C10—H10A110.7C11—N5—C10117.83 (15)
N5—C10—H10B110.7N4—N5—C10104.08 (14)
C9—C10—H10B110.7
C7—C2—C3—C40.4 (2)C12—C11—C16—C150.3 (3)
N3—C2—C3—C4174.90 (16)N5—C11—C16—C15175.19 (18)
C2—C3—C4—C50.4 (3)O1—C1—N2—N3177.20 (13)
C3—C4—C5—C60.6 (3)N1—C1—N2—N31.9 (2)
C4—C5—C6—C70.1 (3)C1—N2—N3—C299.21 (17)
C5—C6—C7—C20.7 (3)C7—C2—N3—N217.9 (2)
C3—C2—C7—C60.9 (2)C3—C2—N3—N2166.97 (14)
N3—C2—C7—C6174.18 (14)O2—C8—N4—N5173.73 (17)
O2—C8—C9—C10160.94 (19)C9—C8—N4—N54.9 (2)
N4—C8—C9—C1017.7 (2)C16—C11—N5—N412.7 (2)
C8—C9—C10—N523.4 (2)C12—C11—N5—N4172.37 (14)
C16—C11—C12—C131.6 (3)C16—C11—N5—C10135.77 (19)
N5—C11—C12—C13176.65 (16)C12—C11—N5—C1049.3 (2)
C11—C12—C13—C141.6 (3)C8—N4—N5—C11119.86 (17)
C12—C13—C14—C150.3 (4)C8—N4—N5—C1010.3 (2)
C13—C14—C15—C161.0 (4)C9—C10—N5—C11107.49 (18)
C14—C15—C16—C111.0 (4)C9—C10—N5—N420.7 (2)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
Cg2 and Cg3 are the centroids of the C11–C16 and C2–C7 rings, respectively
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1B···O1i0.93 (2)2.09 (2)3.0164 (17)178 (2)
N1—H1A···O2ii0.87 (2)2.12 (2)2.9645 (18)161 (2)
N2—H2N···O1iii0.88 (2)2.09 (2)2.9486 (17)166 (2)
N3—H3N···O2iii0.84 (2)2.15 (2)2.9641 (19)161 (2)
N4—H4N···O10.88 (2)2.08 (2)2.9471 (19)167 (2)
C4—H4···Cg2iv0.932.773.653 (3)158
C9—H9B···Cg3v0.972.643.510 (2)149
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y+1, z+1; (ii) x, y+1, z; (iii) x, y+1, z+1; (iv) x1, y+1, z; (v) x, y1, z.
 

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the SAIF, IIT, Madras, India, for the data collection.

References

Return to citationAsifa, S., Khan, M. S., Ahmad, S. & Husain, F. M. (2021). J. Mol. Struct. 1249, 131442.  Google Scholar
Return to citationBruker (2021). SAINT and APEX4. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
Return to citationDesiraju, G. R. & Steiner, T. (1999). The Weak Hydrogen Bond in Structural Chemistry and Biology. Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
Return to citationDomenicano, A., Vaciago, A. & Coulson, C. A. (1975). Acta Cryst. B31, 1630–1641.  CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationFarrugia, L. J. (2012). J. Appl. Cryst. 45, 849–854.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationJia, H.-S., Li, Y.-F., Liu, Y.-Y., Liu, S. & Zhu, H.-J. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, o855.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationKrause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationKunnath, R. J., Seena, E. B., Sithambaresan, M., Patel, M., Jeong, B., Raju, M. & Kurup, M. R. P. (2026). Polyhedron 289, 118002.  CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationKurup, M. R. P., Varghese, B., Sithambaresan, M., Krishnan, S., Sheeja, S. R. & Suresh, E. (2011). Polyhedron 30, 70–78.  CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationMacrae, C. F., Sovago, I., Cottrell, S. J., Galek, P. T. A., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Platings, M., Shields, G. P., Stevens, J. S., Towler, M. & Wood, P. A. (2020). J. Appl. Cryst. 53, 226–235.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationMahadevi, A. S. & Sastry, G. N. (2016). Chem. Rev. 116, 2775–2825.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationOlasunkanmi, O., Idris, A. O., Adewole, A. H., Wahab, O. O. & Ebenso, E. E. (2020). Surf. Interfaces 21, 100782.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationReena, T. A. & Kurup, M. R. P. (2010). Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 76, 322–327.  CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationReena, T. A., Seena, E. B. & Prathapachandra Kurup, M. R. (2008). Polyhedron 27, 1825–1831.  CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationRode, K., Maji, I., Mahajan, S. & Singh, P. K. (2024). Drug Discovery Today 29, 104050.  CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationSakhiya, D. C. & Borkhataria, C. H. (2024). Helion 10, e29057.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSiji, V. L., Kumar, M. R. S., Suma, S. & Kurup, M. R. P. (2010a). Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 76, 22–28.  CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationSiji, V. L., Sudarsanakumar, M. R. & Suma, S. (2010b). Polyhedron 29, 2035–2040.  CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationSpackman, P. R., Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2021). J. Appl. Cryst. 54, 1006–1011.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationTaylor, R. & Day, G. M. (2018). Cryst. Growth Des. 18, 892–904.  CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds