research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Syntheses and crystal structures of di­chlorido­(2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine-κN)(methanol-κO)zinc(II), di­bromido­(2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine-κN)(methanol-κO)zinc(II) and aqua­(2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine-κN)di­iodido­zinc(II)

crossmark logo

aInstitut für Anorganische Chemie, Universität Kiel, Max-Eyth.-Str. 2, 24118 Kiel, Germany
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by W. T. A. Harrison, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom (Received 17 March 2026; accepted 19 March 2026; online 24 March 2026)

Three new compounds with the compositions [ZnCl2(C6H8N2)(CH3OH)] (1), [ZnBr2(C6H8N2)(CH3OH)] (2) and [ZnI2(C6H8N2)(H2O)] (3) were prepared (C6H8N2 = 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine). The asymmetric unit of each compound consists of one ZnII cation, two halide anions, one 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine ligand and one methanol (1 and 2) or water mol­ecule (3), with all atoms located in general positions. Compounds 1 and 2 are not isostructural. In the crystal structures, the metal cations are fourfold coordinated by two halide anions, one 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine ligand and one methanol or water mol­ecule within a slightly distorted tetra­hedral geometry. In 1 and 2 the discrete complexes are linked into chains via O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds between the O—H H atom of the methanol mol­ecule and the 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine N atom that is not involved in the metal coordination. These chains are further linked by weak C—H⋯Cl (1) or C—H⋯Br (2) inter­actions. In 3, two complexes are linked by pairwise O—H⋯I hydrogen bonds into centrosymmetric dimeric units that are further connected by strong O—H⋯O hydrogen bonding between the second water H atom and the 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine N-atom that is adjacent to the two methyl groups.

1. Chemical context

Coordination compounds based on transition metal halides and N-donor coligands shows versatile structural behavior, which is especially the case for CuI halides (Kromp & Sheldrick, 1999View full citation; Peng et al., 2010View full citation; Li et al., 2005View full citation; Näther et al., 2001View full citation, 2002View full citation). For one definite N-donor ligand and one definite halide anion, compounds of a different ratio between the metal halide and the coligand are observed in many cases (Näther & Jess, 2002View full citation).

In contrast, compounds based on twofold positively charged cations such as ZnII show a limited structural behavior because in most cases only a tetra­hedral coordination is observed, leading to discrete complexes if monocoordinating coligands are used. However, there are a few examples for polymeric compounds, in which the ZnII cations are in an octa­hedral coordination and linked into chains by μ-1,1-bridging halide anions (Pickardt & Staub, 1997View full citation; Saha et al., 2017View full citation). Nevertheless, even for metals showing tetra­hedral coordination, compounds with a different stoichiometry and more condensed networks can be obtained if bridging instead of monocoordinating coligands such as, for example, pyrazine are used. With this ligand, compounds with the composition ZnX2(pyrazine)2 (X = Cl, Br) and ZnX2(pyrazine) (X = Cl, Br, I) have been reported (Bhosekar et al., 2006View full citation; Bourne et al., 200; Pickardt & Staub, 1997View full citation; Song et al., 2004View full citation). In all of these compounds, the pyrazine ligand acts as bridging ligand.

In the course of our systematic investigations in this area, we became inter­ested in ZnX2 compounds based on 2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine. Because the methyl group is adjacent to the N atom, coordination of metal cations might be more difficult. In contrast to the pyrazine compounds, when ZnCl2 and 2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine were reacted, two compounds with the composition ZnCl2(2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine)2 and ZnCl2(2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine) were observed (Näther & Bhosekar, 2025aView full citation). The 2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine-rich compound consists of discrete tetra­hedral complexes, in which the coligand is only terminally coordinated, whereas in the 2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine deficient compound the tetra­hedra are linked into chains by bridging 2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine ligands. The corresponding bromide compounds ZnBr2(2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine)2 (Yang et al., 2025View full citation) and ZnBr2(2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine) (Näther & Bhosekar, 2025bView full citation) have also been reported. With ZnI2, only the 2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine-deficient compound ZnI2(2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine was found, which forms discrete complexes and which is isotypic to ZnBr2(2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine) (Näther & Bhosekar, 2026View full citation).

Based on these results, we decided to prepare compounds with 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine (C6H8N2), in which one of the N atoms is adjacent to both methyl groups, which make a metal coordination even more difficult. In this context, it is noted that one compound with the composition ZnI2(2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine)2 is already reported, which consists of discrete complexes in which the metal cations are coordinated by two iodide anions and two terminal 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine ligands (Lee et al., 2008View full citation). As expected, the 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine ligand coordinates with the N atom that is not adjacent to the two methyl groups. As part of these investigations, we prepared and isolated crystals of the three title compounds, which were characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction.

[Scheme 1]

2. Structural commentary

The asymmetric units of ZnCl2(C6H8N2)(CH3OH) (1) and of ZnBr2(C6H8N2)(CH3OH) (2) consist of one ZnII cation, two crystallographically independent halide anions, one 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine ligand and one methanol mol­ecule, with all atoms lying on general crystallographic positions (Fig. 1[link]). Compounds 1 (space group PMathematical equation) and 2 (space group P21/n) are not isostructural.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
Crystal structures of 1 with labeling and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.

In the crystal structures, the metal cations are tetra­hedrally coordinated by two halide anions, one methanol mol­ecule and one 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine ligand that is coordinated by the N atom that is not adjacent to the methyl groups (Fig. 1[link]). Bond lengths and angles shows that the tetra­hedra are strongly distorted with the halide–Zn–halide angles showing the largest values (Tables 1[link] and 2[link]).

Table 1
Selected geometric parameters (Å, °) for 1[link]

Zn1—Cl1 2.2088 (11) Zn1—O1 2.024 (3)
Zn1—Cl2 2.2008 (10) Zn1—N2 2.064 (3)
       
Cl2—Zn1—Cl1 122.64 (4) O1—Zn1—N2 102.15 (11)
O1—Zn1—Cl1 106.68 (9) N2—Zn1—Cl1 108.38 (9)
O1—Zn1—Cl2 104.91 (9) N2—Zn1—Cl2 110.06 (9)

Table 2
Selected geometric parameters (Å, °) for 2[link]

Zn1—Br1 2.3533 (5) Zn1—O1 2.003 (2)
Zn1—Br2 2.3334 (5) Zn1—N2 2.075 (3)
       
Br2—Zn1—Br1 123.16 (2) O1—Zn1—N2 103.06 (11)
O1—Zn1—Br1 110.09 (9) N2—Zn1—Br1 105.94 (7)
O1—Zn1—Br2 101.02 (7) N2—Zn1—Br2 111.81 (8)

The asymmetric unit of ZnI2(C6H8N2)(H2O) (3) consists of one ZnII cation, two iodide anions, one 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine ligand and one water mol­ecule in general positions (Fig. 2[link]). The metal cations are fourfold coordinated by two halide anions, one 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine ligand and one water mol­ecule (Fig. 1[link]: bottom). As in compounds 1 and 2, the coordination polyhedra can be described as strongly distorted tetra­hedra (Table 3[link]).

Table 3
Selected geometric parameters (Å, °) for 3[link]

Zn1—I1 2.5557 (5) Zn1—O1 2.022 (3)
Zn1—I2 2.5352 (5) Zn1—N2 2.077 (3)
       
I2—Zn1—I1 121.276 (18) O1—Zn1—N2 97.32 (12)
O1—Zn1—I1 103.93 (8) N2—Zn1—I1 113.23 (9)
O1—Zn1—I2 112.16 (8) N2—Zn1—I2 106.39 (9)
[Figure 2]
Figure 2
Crystal structures of 2 with labeling and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.

As expected, in all three compounds the 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine ligand is coordinated to the zinc cations with the N2 nitro­gen atom that is not adjacent to the two methyl groups because of steric crowding and this might also be the reason why no compounds with bridging 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine ligands were isolated. This is in contrast to, for example, compounds with 2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine such as ZnCl2(2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine) (Näther & Bhosekar, 2025aView full citation) and ZnBr2(2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine) (Näther & Bhosekar, 2025bView full citation) in which the metal centers are linked by the 2,3-di­methyl­pyrazine ligands.

3. Supra­molecular features

In compound 1 and 2, the discrete complexes are linked via O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds between the hydroxyl H atom of the methanol mol­ecule and the 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine N atom that is not involved in the metal coordination (Fig. 3[link] and Tables 4[link] and 5[link]). The O—H⋯N bond angles are close to linear and the H⋯N distances below 2 Å, indicating strong hydrogen bonds (Tables 4[link] and 5[link]). The geometry of the chains in 1 and 2 is slightly different because of a different rotation of the methanol mol­ecule and the 2,6 di­methyl­pyrazine ligands.

Table 4
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for 1[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯N1i 0.84 (2) 1.90 (2) 2.738 (4) 173 (5)
C3—H3⋯Cl2ii 0.95 2.86 3.721 (4) 152
C5—H5B⋯Cl1iii 0.98 2.84 3.721 (4) 150
C5—H5C⋯Cl1iv 0.98 2.88 3.842 (4) 168
C6—H6A⋯Cl2iv 0.98 2.98 3.929 (4) 163
C6—H6B⋯Cl2ii 0.98 2.82 3.767 (4) 163
C7—H7A⋯Cl2v 0.98 2.98 3.876 (5) 153
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation; (iii) Mathematical equation; (iv) Mathematical equation; (v) Mathematical equation.

Table 5
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for 2[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯N1i 0.83 (2) 1.84 (2) 2.677 (3) 178 (5)
C11—H11A⋯Br2ii 0.98 3.13 3.767 (4) 124
C11—H11C⋯Br1iii 0.98 2.88 3.807 (4) 157
C2—H2⋯Br1iv 0.95 3.12 3.994 (3) 153
C3—H3⋯Br1 0.95 3.05 3.626 (3) 121
C5—H5B⋯Br1iv 0.98 2.95 3.903 (4) 166
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation; (iii) Mathematical equation; (iv) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Crystal structure of 3 with labeling and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.

These chains are inter­linked by a number of C—H⋯Cl and C—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds. The C—H⋯X angles (X = Cl, Br), especially for the chloride compound, are mostly close to linear, indicating stronger inter­actions (Figs. 4[link] and 5[link] and Tables 4[link] and 5[link]).

[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Crystal structure of 1 (top) and 2 (bottom) with view of a part of a chain. Inter­molecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines.
[Figure 5]
Figure 5
Crystal structure of 1 (top) and 2 (bottom) with view along the crystallographic a-axis direction and hydrogen bonds shown as dashed lines.

In compound 3, two complexes are linked into dimers by centrosymmetric pairs of O—H⋯I hydrogen bonds between one of the water H atoms and the iodide anions, generating eight-membered rings. The O—H⋯I angle of 172 (5)° and the H⋯I distance of only 2.70 (2) Å indicate relatively strong hydrogen bonding (Fig. 6[link] and Table 6[link]). These dimers are linked by strong O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds between the second water H atom and the 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine ligands that are not involved in the metal coordination (Fig. 7[link] and Table 6[link]). There are additional C—H⋯I inter­actions with much longer H⋯I distances indicating only weak inter­actions.

Table 6
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for 3[link]

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1A⋯I1i 0.86 (2) 2.70 (2) 3.555 (3) 172 (5)
O1—H1B⋯N1ii 0.85 (2) 1.87 (2) 2.708 (4) 172 (5)
C2—H2⋯I2 0.95 3.22 3.776 (4) 119
C5—H5A⋯I2iii 0.98 3.25 4.207 (5) 165
Symmetry codes: (i) Mathematical equation; (ii) Mathematical equation; (iii) Mathematical equation.
[Figure 6]
Figure 6
Crystal structure of 3 with view of a dimeric unit and C—H⋯I and O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds shown as dashed lines.
[Figure 7]
Figure 7
Crystal structure of 3 with view along the crystallographic a-axis direction and inter­molecular hydrogen bonding shown as dashed lines.

4. Database survey

A literature search revealed that only one coordination compound with Zn halides and 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine is reported in the CSD (Version 5.43, 2025; Groom et al., 2016View full citation) using CONQUEST (Bruno et al., 2002View full citation). This is ZnI2(2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine)2 (CSD refcode XIYGIW; Lee et al., 2008View full citation), in which the Zn cations are coordinated by two iodide anions and two terminal 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine ligands into discrete complexes. Many more compounds are reported with pyrazine. These include ZnCl2(pyrazine)2 (REMPAB, Bhosekar et al., 2006View full citation) and ZnBr2(pyrazine)2 (EBOLAI, Bourne et al., 2001View full citation and EBOLAI01, Bhosekar et al., 2006View full citation) and ZnX2(pyrazine) [X = Cl (TISTAQ, Pickardt & Staub, 1996View full citation), Br (EBOKUB, Bourne et al., 2001View full citation) and I (ISOPOV, Song et al., 2004View full citation and ISOPOV01, Bhosekar et al., 2006View full citation)].

5. Synthesis and crystallization

General

Zinc chloride, zinc bromide and zinc iodide as well as 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

Synthesis of 1

0.500 mmol (68.1 mg) of zinc chloride and 1.00 mmol (108.1 mg 2,6-of di­methyl­pyrazine were reacted in 3 ml of methanol. Within 2 d, crystals were obtained suitable for single crystal X-ray diffraction.

Synthesis of 2

0.500 mmol (112.6 mg) of zinc bromide and 1.00 mmol (108.1 mg) of 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine were reacted in 3 ml of methanol. Within 3 d, crystals were obtained suitable for single crystal X-ray diffraction.

Synthesis of 3

0.500 mmol (159.6 mg) of zinc iodide and 1.00 mmol (108.1 mg) of 2,6-di­methyl­pyrazine were reacted in 3 mL of a water/methanol mixture (1:1). Within 2 d, crystals were obtained suitable for single crystal X-ray diffraction.

6. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 7[link]. The C—H hydrogen atoms were positioned with idealized geometry (methyl H atoms allowed to rotate but not to tip) and were refined isotropically with Uiso(H) = 1.2 Ueq(C) (1.5 for methyl H atoms).

Table 7
Experimental details

  1 2 3
Crystal data
Chemical formula [ZnCl2(C6H8N2)(CH4O)] [ZnBr2(C6H8N2)(CH4O)] [ZnI2(C6H8N2)(H2O)]
Mr 276.46 365.38 445.33
Crystal system, space group Triclinic, PMathematical equation Monoclinic, P21/n Monoclinic, P21/n
Temperature (K) 170 170 170
a, b, c (Å) 6.0481 (6), 7.4627 (7), 12.9967 (13) 7.1931 (5), 15.2428 (9), 11.4186 (6) 7.3914 (5), 14.7767 (8), 10.9917 (7)
α, β, γ (°) 89.945 (12), 85.471 (12), 74.710 (11) 90, 103.937 (7), 90 90, 94.883 (8), 90
V3) 563.96 (10) 1215.11 (13) 1196.16 (13)
Z 2 4 4
Radiation type Mo Kα Mo Kα Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 2.62 8.57 7.18
Crystal size (mm) 0.22 × 0.18 × 0.16 0.12 × 0.10 × 0.08 0.12 × 0.08 × 0.06
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Stoe IPDS2 Stoe IPDS2 Stoe IPDS2
Absorption correction Numerical (X-RED and X-SHAPE; Stoe, 2008View full citation) Numerical (X-RED and X-SHAPE; Stoe, 2008View full citation) Numerical (X-RED and X-SHAPE; Stoe, 2008View full citation)
Tmin, Tmax 0.655, 0.765 0.236, 0.357 0.295, 0.510
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 5812, 2675, 2223 10027, 2943, 2434 12550, 2880, 2477
Rint 0.048 0.031 0.040
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.660 0.662 0.661
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.046, 0.132, 1.05 0.031, 0.078, 1.02 0.028, 0.070, 1.03
No. of reflections 2675 2943 2880
No. of parameters 125 125 118
No. of restraints 1 1 3
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 1.36, −1.32 0.47, −0.61 0.78, −0.93
Computer programs: X-AREA (Stoe, 2008View full citation), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015aView full citation), SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015bView full citation), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999View full citation), XP in SHELXTL-PC (Sheldrick, 2008View full citation) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010View full citation).

Supporting information


Computing details top

Dichlorido(2,6-dimethylpyrazine-κN)(methanol-κO)zinc(II) (1) top
Crystal data top
[ZnCl2(C6H8N2)(CH4O)]Z = 2
Mr = 276.46F(000) = 280
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.628 Mg m3
a = 6.0481 (6) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 7.4627 (7) ÅCell parameters from 2716 reflections
c = 12.9967 (13) Åθ = 2.9–28.1°
α = 89.945 (12)°µ = 2.62 mm1
β = 85.471 (12)°T = 170 K
γ = 74.710 (11)°Block, colorless
V = 563.96 (10) Å30.22 × 0.18 × 0.16 mm
Data collection top
Stoe IPDS-2
diffractometer
2223 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.048
ω scansθmax = 28.0°, θmin = 2.8°
Absorption correction: numerical
(X-Red and X-Shape; Stoe, 2008)
h = 77
Tmin = 0.655, Tmax = 0.765k = 99
5812 measured reflectionsl = 1717
2675 independent reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: mixed
Least-squares matrix: fullH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0889P)2 + 0.0814P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.132(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
S = 1.05Δρmax = 1.36 e Å3
2675 reflectionsΔρmin = 1.32 e Å3
125 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL-2016/6 (Sheldrick 2015b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
1 restraintExtinction coefficient: 0.028 (5)
Primary atom site location: dual
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Zn11.02256 (6)0.32540 (5)0.25117 (3)0.01229 (18)
Cl11.18124 (16)0.30675 (14)0.09118 (8)0.0246 (3)
Cl21.21156 (16)0.35079 (14)0.38598 (8)0.0241 (3)
O10.9178 (4)0.0914 (4)0.2745 (2)0.0172 (6)
H11.028 (6)0.005 (5)0.270 (4)0.026*
N10.2974 (5)0.7935 (4)0.2674 (2)0.0124 (6)
N20.7144 (5)0.5283 (4)0.2586 (2)0.0133 (6)
C10.3971 (6)0.7158 (5)0.1768 (3)0.0132 (7)
C20.6088 (6)0.5818 (5)0.1728 (3)0.0139 (7)
H20.6786220.5280080.1080480.017*
C30.6139 (6)0.6067 (5)0.3488 (3)0.0140 (7)
H30.6875470.5706670.4103530.017*
C40.4018 (6)0.7410 (5)0.3542 (3)0.0133 (7)
C50.2791 (7)0.7769 (6)0.0814 (3)0.0215 (8)
H5A0.1449830.7268290.0798900.032*
H5B0.3857380.7309790.0206280.032*
H5C0.2291480.9128840.0809480.032*
C60.2844 (7)0.8266 (6)0.4547 (3)0.0221 (8)
H6A0.2372840.9620920.4489150.033*
H6B0.3905380.7928520.5090890.033*
H6C0.1485160.7810270.4720880.033*
C70.7388 (7)0.0526 (6)0.2186 (4)0.0287 (10)
H7A0.5941420.1472340.2364400.043*
H7B0.7200380.0701440.2371400.043*
H7C0.7804650.0543970.1442860.043*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Zn10.0077 (2)0.0089 (2)0.0179 (3)0.00237 (15)0.00194 (15)0.00016 (15)
Cl10.0228 (5)0.0263 (5)0.0199 (5)0.0002 (4)0.0051 (4)0.0030 (4)
Cl20.0205 (5)0.0272 (5)0.0253 (5)0.0052 (4)0.0105 (4)0.0016 (4)
O10.0106 (12)0.0105 (12)0.0289 (15)0.0007 (9)0.0032 (11)0.0025 (11)
N10.0081 (13)0.0080 (13)0.0199 (16)0.0000 (10)0.0013 (11)0.0022 (11)
N20.0076 (13)0.0114 (14)0.0179 (15)0.0028 (11)0.0016 (11)0.0002 (11)
C10.0111 (15)0.0083 (15)0.0196 (18)0.0010 (12)0.0038 (13)0.0000 (13)
C20.0110 (15)0.0099 (16)0.0181 (17)0.0020 (12)0.0011 (13)0.0018 (13)
C30.0119 (15)0.0114 (16)0.0160 (17)0.0024 (13)0.0030 (13)0.0004 (13)
C40.0123 (16)0.0104 (15)0.0157 (17)0.0007 (12)0.0004 (13)0.0012 (13)
C50.0200 (18)0.0208 (19)0.0194 (19)0.0038 (15)0.0077 (15)0.0019 (15)
C60.0184 (18)0.023 (2)0.0178 (19)0.0062 (15)0.0004 (15)0.0009 (15)
C70.0178 (19)0.020 (2)0.049 (3)0.0050 (16)0.0101 (18)0.0034 (19)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Zn1—Cl12.2088 (11)C3—H30.9500
Zn1—Cl22.2008 (10)C3—C41.401 (5)
Zn1—O12.024 (3)C4—C61.495 (5)
Zn1—N22.064 (3)C5—H5A0.9800
O1—H10.841 (19)C5—H5B0.9800
O1—C71.439 (5)C5—H5C0.9800
N1—C11.339 (5)C6—H6A0.9800
N1—C41.343 (5)C6—H6B0.9800
N2—C21.337 (5)C6—H6C0.9800
N2—C31.338 (5)C7—H7A0.9800
C1—C21.398 (4)C7—H7B0.9800
C1—C51.491 (5)C7—H7C0.9800
C2—H20.9500
Cl2—Zn1—Cl1122.64 (4)N1—C4—C3119.8 (3)
O1—Zn1—Cl1106.68 (9)N1—C4—C6118.4 (3)
O1—Zn1—Cl2104.91 (9)C3—C4—C6121.8 (3)
O1—Zn1—N2102.15 (11)C1—C5—H5A109.5
N2—Zn1—Cl1108.38 (9)C1—C5—H5B109.5
N2—Zn1—Cl2110.06 (9)C1—C5—H5C109.5
Zn1—O1—H1113 (4)H5A—C5—H5B109.5
C7—O1—Zn1121.7 (2)H5A—C5—H5C109.5
C7—O1—H1107 (3)H5B—C5—H5C109.5
C1—N1—C4119.4 (3)C4—C6—H6A109.5
C2—N2—Zn1120.4 (2)C4—C6—H6B109.5
C2—N2—C3118.5 (3)C4—C6—H6C109.5
C3—N2—Zn1121.1 (2)H6A—C6—H6B109.5
N1—C1—C2120.1 (3)H6A—C6—H6C109.5
N1—C1—C5118.6 (3)H6B—C6—H6C109.5
C2—C1—C5121.3 (3)O1—C7—H7A109.5
N2—C2—C1121.0 (3)O1—C7—H7B109.5
N2—C2—H2119.5O1—C7—H7C109.5
C1—C2—H2119.5H7A—C7—H7B109.5
N2—C3—H3119.5H7A—C7—H7C109.5
N2—C3—C4121.1 (3)H7B—C7—H7C109.5
C4—C3—H3119.5
Zn1—N2—C2—C1178.4 (3)C1—N1—C4—C6178.6 (3)
Zn1—N2—C3—C4178.3 (3)C2—N2—C3—C40.5 (5)
N1—C1—C2—N20.4 (6)C3—N2—C2—C10.4 (5)
N2—C3—C4—N10.4 (6)C4—N1—C1—C20.3 (5)
N2—C3—C4—C6178.5 (4)C4—N1—C1—C5179.6 (3)
C1—N1—C4—C30.4 (5)C5—C1—C2—N2179.6 (4)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···N1i0.84 (2)1.90 (2)2.738 (4)173 (5)
C3—H3···Cl2ii0.952.863.721 (4)152
C5—H5B···Cl1iii0.982.843.721 (4)150
C5—H5C···Cl1iv0.982.883.842 (4)168
C6—H6A···Cl2iv0.982.983.929 (4)163
C6—H6B···Cl2ii0.982.823.767 (4)163
C7—H7A···Cl2v0.982.983.876 (5)153
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y1, z; (ii) x+2, y+1, z+1; (iii) x+2, y+1, z; (iv) x1, y+1, z; (v) x1, y, z.
Dibromido(2,6-dimethylpyrazine-κN)(methanol-κO)zinc(II) (2) top
Crystal data top
[ZnBr2(C6H8N2)(CH4O)]F(000) = 704
Mr = 365.38Dx = 1.997 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.1931 (5) ÅCell parameters from 8000 reflections
b = 15.2428 (9) Åθ = 7.2–27.3°
c = 11.4186 (6) ŵ = 8.57 mm1
β = 103.937 (7)°T = 170 K
V = 1215.11 (13) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 40.12 × 0.10 × 0.08 mm
Data collection top
Stoe IPDS-2
diffractometer
2434 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.031
ω scansθmax = 28.1°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: numerical
(X-Red and X-Shape; Stoe, 2008)
h = 99
Tmin = 0.236, Tmax = 0.357k = 2020
10027 measured reflectionsl = 1315
2943 independent reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: mixed
Least-squares matrix: fullH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.031 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0515P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.078(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
S = 1.02Δρmax = 0.47 e Å3
2943 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.61 e Å3
125 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL-2016/6 (Sheldrick 2015b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
1 restraintExtinction coefficient: 0.0084 (7)
Primary atom site location: dual
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Zn10.62772 (5)0.63072 (2)0.71740 (3)0.01889 (11)
Br10.73136 (5)0.48630 (2)0.69719 (3)0.02990 (12)
Br20.72234 (5)0.71163 (3)0.89530 (3)0.03381 (12)
O10.3423 (3)0.6336 (2)0.6914 (2)0.0344 (6)
H10.308 (7)0.660 (3)0.747 (4)0.052*
C110.1921 (5)0.5986 (3)0.6012 (3)0.0309 (7)
H11A0.1072360.6460530.5628250.046*
H11B0.1193660.5565340.6375160.046*
H11C0.2451220.5686770.5405440.046*
N10.7234 (4)0.78592 (19)0.3686 (2)0.0220 (5)
N20.6734 (4)0.69914 (17)0.5698 (2)0.0188 (5)
C10.7187 (4)0.8310 (2)0.4688 (3)0.0228 (6)
C20.6960 (4)0.7861 (2)0.5705 (3)0.0217 (6)
H20.6966440.8179790.6420870.026*
C30.6748 (4)0.6556 (2)0.4683 (3)0.0213 (6)
H30.6563280.5938910.4658300.026*
C40.7024 (4)0.6984 (2)0.3666 (3)0.0229 (6)
C50.7385 (7)0.9290 (2)0.4656 (4)0.0410 (9)
H5A0.8613140.9440690.4477650.062*
H5B0.7335550.9536310.5440440.062*
H5C0.6336280.9533630.4027490.062*
C60.7132 (6)0.6496 (3)0.2544 (3)0.0341 (8)
H6A0.6565300.6853920.1834740.051*
H6B0.6426390.5942580.2504310.051*
H6C0.8474880.6372980.2559160.051*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Zn10.01907 (18)0.02417 (19)0.01512 (19)0.00124 (13)0.00745 (13)0.00053 (13)
Br10.0435 (2)0.02313 (17)0.02577 (19)0.00434 (13)0.01359 (15)0.00339 (13)
Br20.02469 (18)0.0514 (2)0.02468 (19)0.00688 (15)0.00469 (13)0.01538 (15)
O10.0184 (10)0.0626 (18)0.0240 (12)0.0024 (11)0.0089 (9)0.0233 (12)
C110.0277 (16)0.039 (2)0.0248 (17)0.0036 (14)0.0036 (13)0.0066 (15)
N10.0188 (12)0.0312 (14)0.0174 (13)0.0020 (10)0.0072 (10)0.0038 (11)
N20.0192 (12)0.0229 (12)0.0159 (12)0.0003 (10)0.0070 (10)0.0019 (10)
C10.0231 (15)0.0269 (16)0.0204 (15)0.0034 (12)0.0092 (12)0.0013 (12)
C20.0214 (14)0.0276 (16)0.0180 (15)0.0034 (12)0.0090 (12)0.0003 (12)
C30.0229 (14)0.0224 (15)0.0200 (15)0.0008 (11)0.0077 (12)0.0015 (12)
C40.0206 (14)0.0301 (16)0.0204 (15)0.0008 (12)0.0095 (12)0.0012 (12)
C50.065 (3)0.0275 (18)0.034 (2)0.0106 (18)0.0197 (19)0.0004 (16)
C60.047 (2)0.037 (2)0.0227 (17)0.0013 (17)0.0177 (16)0.0036 (15)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Zn1—Br12.3533 (5)C1—C21.391 (4)
Zn1—Br22.3334 (5)C1—C51.503 (5)
Zn1—O12.003 (2)C2—H20.9500
Zn1—N22.075 (3)C3—H30.9500
O1—H10.833 (19)C3—C41.387 (4)
O1—C111.406 (4)C4—C61.499 (5)
C11—H11A0.9800C5—H5A0.9800
C11—H11B0.9800C5—H5B0.9800
C11—H11C0.9800C5—H5C0.9800
N1—C11.342 (4)C6—H6A0.9800
N1—C41.343 (4)C6—H6B0.9800
N2—C21.335 (4)C6—H6C0.9800
N2—C31.337 (4)
Br2—Zn1—Br1123.16 (2)N2—C2—C1121.4 (3)
O1—Zn1—Br1110.09 (9)N2—C2—H2119.3
O1—Zn1—Br2101.02 (7)C1—C2—H2119.3
O1—Zn1—N2103.06 (11)N2—C3—H3119.2
N2—Zn1—Br1105.94 (7)N2—C3—C4121.7 (3)
N2—Zn1—Br2111.81 (8)C4—C3—H3119.2
Zn1—O1—H1112 (4)N1—C4—C3119.4 (3)
C11—O1—Zn1132.8 (2)N1—C4—C6118.6 (3)
C11—O1—H1115 (4)C3—C4—C6122.0 (3)
O1—C11—H11A109.5C1—C5—H5A109.5
O1—C11—H11B109.5C1—C5—H5B109.5
O1—C11—H11C109.5C1—C5—H5C109.5
H11A—C11—H11B109.5H5A—C5—H5B109.5
H11A—C11—H11C109.5H5A—C5—H5C109.5
H11B—C11—H11C109.5H5B—C5—H5C109.5
C1—N1—C4119.8 (3)C4—C6—H6A109.5
C2—N2—Zn1122.5 (2)C4—C6—H6B109.5
C2—N2—C3118.1 (3)C4—C6—H6C109.5
C3—N2—Zn1119.4 (2)H6A—C6—H6B109.5
N1—C1—C2119.5 (3)H6A—C6—H6C109.5
N1—C1—C5117.8 (3)H6B—C6—H6C109.5
C2—C1—C5122.7 (3)
Zn1—N2—C2—C1177.3 (2)C1—N1—C4—C6178.5 (3)
Zn1—N2—C3—C4179.2 (2)C2—N2—C3—C41.2 (5)
N1—C1—C2—N21.9 (5)C3—N2—C2—C10.6 (5)
N2—C3—C4—N11.8 (5)C4—N1—C1—C21.3 (4)
N2—C3—C4—C6177.1 (3)C4—N1—C1—C5178.7 (3)
C1—N1—C4—C30.5 (4)C5—C1—C2—N2178.1 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···N1i0.83 (2)1.84 (2)2.677 (3)178 (5)
C11—H11A···Br2ii0.983.133.767 (4)124
C11—H11C···Br1iii0.982.883.807 (4)157
C2—H2···Br1iv0.953.123.994 (3)153
C3—H3···Br10.953.053.626 (3)121
C5—H5B···Br1iv0.982.953.903 (4)166
Symmetry codes: (i) x1/2, y+3/2, z+1/2; (ii) x1/2, y+3/2, z1/2; (iii) x+1, y+1, z+1; (iv) x+3/2, y+1/2, z+3/2.
Aqua(2,6-dimethylpyrazine-κN)diiodidozinc(II) (3) top
Crystal data top
[ZnI2(C6H8N2)(H2O)]F(000) = 816
Mr = 445.33Dx = 2.473 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.3914 (5) ÅCell parameters from 7998 reflections
b = 14.7767 (8) Åθ = 8.5–27.1°
c = 10.9917 (7) ŵ = 7.18 mm1
β = 94.883 (8)°T = 170 K
V = 1196.16 (13) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 40.12 × 0.08 × 0.06 mm
Data collection top
Stoe IPDS-2
diffractometer
2477 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.040
ω scansθmax = 28.0°, θmin = 2.3°
Absorption correction: numerical
(X-Red and X-Shape; Stoe, 2008)
h = 99
Tmin = 0.295, Tmax = 0.510k = 1919
12550 measured reflectionsl = 1414
2880 independent reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: mixed
Least-squares matrix: fullH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.028 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0479P)2]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.070(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.02Δρmax = 0.78 e Å3
2880 reflectionsΔρmin = 0.93 e Å3
118 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXL-2016/6 (Sheldrick 2015b), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
3 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.0043 (3)
Primary atom site location: dual
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Zn10.73068 (6)0.45260 (3)0.33652 (4)0.01746 (11)
I10.70914 (3)0.61402 (2)0.41751 (2)0.02247 (9)
I20.92934 (4)0.41488 (2)0.16648 (2)0.03004 (10)
O10.4691 (4)0.41616 (19)0.2948 (3)0.0225 (6)
H1A0.417 (7)0.412 (3)0.361 (3)0.034*
H1B0.433 (7)0.371 (2)0.252 (4)0.034*
N10.8726 (4)0.2232 (2)0.6430 (3)0.0184 (6)
N20.7913 (4)0.3577 (2)0.4732 (3)0.0183 (6)
C10.8679 (5)0.2047 (3)0.5226 (3)0.0208 (7)
C20.8277 (5)0.2728 (2)0.4380 (3)0.0211 (7)
H20.8257140.2593170.3533580.025*
C30.7957 (5)0.3750 (2)0.5925 (3)0.0185 (7)
H30.7703840.4344350.6192520.022*
C40.8369 (5)0.3069 (2)0.6790 (3)0.0187 (7)
C50.9078 (7)0.1104 (3)0.4843 (4)0.0292 (9)
H5A1.0249370.0910710.5243920.044*
H5B0.9127020.1084620.3955080.044*
H5C0.8119970.0697320.5077870.044*
C60.8398 (8)0.3260 (3)0.8127 (4)0.0356 (10)
H6A0.7623780.2821630.8506270.053*
H6B0.7943850.3873130.8249710.053*
H6C0.9644980.3209200.8502120.053*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Zn10.0199 (2)0.01571 (19)0.0166 (2)0.00201 (15)0.00033 (16)0.00198 (15)
I10.02262 (14)0.01846 (13)0.02691 (14)0.00292 (9)0.00547 (10)0.00573 (9)
I20.03415 (17)0.03106 (16)0.02667 (15)0.00725 (11)0.01290 (11)0.00196 (10)
O10.0219 (14)0.0237 (13)0.0218 (13)0.0040 (11)0.0014 (11)0.0067 (11)
N10.0185 (15)0.0168 (14)0.0198 (15)0.0022 (12)0.0012 (12)0.0032 (11)
N20.0176 (15)0.0172 (14)0.0196 (14)0.0044 (12)0.0009 (12)0.0056 (12)
C10.0211 (18)0.0201 (17)0.0208 (17)0.0003 (14)0.0008 (14)0.0002 (14)
C20.0241 (19)0.0201 (17)0.0183 (17)0.0001 (14)0.0032 (15)0.0011 (14)
C30.0184 (17)0.0157 (15)0.0217 (17)0.0034 (13)0.0036 (14)0.0006 (13)
C40.0197 (18)0.0195 (17)0.0170 (16)0.0022 (14)0.0029 (13)0.0048 (13)
C50.043 (3)0.0177 (17)0.0255 (19)0.0012 (17)0.0035 (18)0.0024 (15)
C60.059 (3)0.032 (2)0.0159 (19)0.008 (2)0.0074 (19)0.0014 (16)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
Zn1—I12.5557 (5)C1—C51.492 (5)
Zn1—I22.5352 (5)C2—H20.9500
Zn1—O12.022 (3)C3—H30.9500
Zn1—N22.077 (3)C3—C41.400 (5)
O1—H1A0.858 (19)C4—C61.495 (5)
O1—H1B0.849 (19)C5—H5A0.9800
N1—C11.349 (5)C5—H5B0.9800
N1—C41.331 (5)C5—H5C0.9800
N2—C21.347 (5)C6—H6A0.9800
N2—C31.334 (5)C6—H6B0.9800
C1—C21.385 (5)C6—H6C0.9800
I2—Zn1—I1121.276 (18)N2—C3—H3119.5
O1—Zn1—I1103.93 (8)N2—C3—C4121.0 (3)
O1—Zn1—I2112.16 (8)C4—C3—H3119.5
O1—Zn1—N297.32 (12)N1—C4—C3120.2 (3)
N2—Zn1—I1113.23 (9)N1—C4—C6118.7 (3)
N2—Zn1—I2106.39 (9)C3—C4—C6121.0 (3)
Zn1—O1—H1A108 (3)C1—C5—H5A109.5
Zn1—O1—H1B126 (4)C1—C5—H5B109.5
H1A—O1—H1B106 (4)C1—C5—H5C109.5
C4—N1—C1119.4 (3)H5A—C5—H5B109.5
C2—N2—Zn1117.2 (2)H5A—C5—H5C109.5
C3—N2—Zn1124.6 (2)H5B—C5—H5C109.5
C3—N2—C2118.2 (3)C4—C6—H6A109.5
N1—C1—C2119.8 (3)C4—C6—H6B109.5
N1—C1—C5118.5 (3)C4—C6—H6C109.5
C2—C1—C5121.6 (3)H6A—C6—H6B109.5
N2—C2—C1121.3 (3)H6A—C6—H6C109.5
N2—C2—H2119.3H6B—C6—H6C109.5
C1—C2—H2119.3
Zn1—N2—C2—C1179.4 (3)C1—N1—C4—C6179.0 (4)
Zn1—N2—C3—C4179.7 (3)C2—N2—C3—C40.0 (5)
N1—C1—C2—N20.6 (6)C3—N2—C2—C10.3 (6)
N2—C3—C4—N10.0 (6)C4—N1—C1—C20.6 (6)
N2—C3—C4—C6179.3 (4)C4—N1—C1—C5179.8 (4)
C1—N1—C4—C30.3 (5)C5—C1—C2—N2179.8 (4)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1A···I1i0.86 (2)2.70 (2)3.555 (3)172 (5)
O1—H1B···N1ii0.85 (2)1.87 (2)2.708 (4)172 (5)
C2—H2···I20.953.223.776 (4)119
C5—H5A···I2iii0.983.254.207 (5)165
Symmetry codes: (i) x+1, y+1, z+1; (ii) x1/2, y+1/2, z1/2; (iii) x+1/2, y+1/2, z+1/2.
 

Acknowledgements

Financial support by the State of Schleswig-Holstein is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Return to citationBhosekar, G., Jess, I. & Näther, C. (2006). Inorg. Chem. 45, 6508–6515.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationBourne, S. A., Kilkenny, M. & Nassimbeni, L. R. (2001). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 1176–1179.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationBrandenburg, K. (1999). DIAMOND. Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.  Google Scholar
Return to citationBruno, I. J., Cole, J. C., Edgington, P. R., Kessler, M., Macrae, C. F., McCabe, P., Pearson, J. & Taylor, R. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 389–397.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationGroom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationKromp, T. & Sheldrick, W. S. (1999). Z. Naturforsch. B 54, 1175–1180.  CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationLee, S. H., Kim, S.-H., Kim, P.-G., Kim, C. & Kim, Y. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, m511.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationLi, D., Shi, W. J. & Hou, L. (2005). Inorg. Chem. 44, 3907–3913.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationNäther, C. & Bhosekar, G. (2025a). Acta Cryst. E81, 694–698.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationNäther, C. & Bhosekar, G. (2025b). Acta Cryst. E81, 928–931.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationNäther, C. & Bhosekar, G. (2026). Acta Cryst. E82, 244–248.  CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationNäther, C., Greve, J. & Jess, I. (2002). Solid State Sci. 4, 813–820.  Google Scholar
Return to citationNäther, C. & Jess, I. (2002). J. Solid State Chem. 169, 103–112.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationNäther, C., Jess, I. & Greve, J. (2001). Polyhedron 20, 1017–1022.  Google Scholar
Return to citationPeng, R., Li, M. & Li, D. (2010). Coord. Chem. Rev. 254, 1–18.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationPickardt, J. & Staub, B. (1996). Z. Naturforsch B51, 947–951.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationPickardt, J. & Staub, B. (1997). Z. Naturforsch B52, 1456–1460.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationSaha, B. K., Rather, S. A. & Saha, A. (2017). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 3390–3394.  Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSong, Y., Niu, Y., Hou, H. & Zhu, Y. (2004). J. Mol. Struct. 689, 69–74.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationStoe (2008). X-AREA X-RED and X-SHAPE. Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany.  Google Scholar
Return to citationWestrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationYang, C., Zheng, J., Xu, C., Xiao, C., Chang, Y., Zhou, L. & Gong, X. (2025). Chem. Commun. 61, 4379–4382.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds