research communications\(\def\hfill{\hskip 5em}\def\hfil{\hskip 3em}\def\eqno#1{\hfil {#1}}\)

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890

Synthesis, crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of 4-(3-hy­dr­oxy-6-meth­­oxy-4-oxo-4H-chromen-2-yl)benzaldehyde

crossmark logo

aV. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq., Kharkiv 61022, Ukraine, bInstitute of Functional Materials Chemistry, SSI "Institute for Single Crystals" of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Nauki Ave 60, Kharkiv, 61001, Ukraine, and cV. I. Vernadskii Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Prospect Palladina 32/34, 03680 Kyiv, Ukraine
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]

Edited by A. Briceno, Venezuelan Institute of Scientific Research, Venezuela (Received 30 January 2026; accepted 2 April 2026; online 10 April 2026)

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C17H12O5, contains one crystallographically independent mol­ecule featuring a chromenone fragment with hy­droxy and meth­oxy substituents and a benzaldehyde group. Intra­molecular O—H⋯O, C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds are observed. In the crystal, mol­ecules are linked by O—H⋯O inter­molecular bonds, forming chains along [201]. The Hirshfeld surface analysis shows that the H⋯H and O⋯H/H⋯O contacts dominate the crystal packing with contributions of 34.2% and 27.6%, respectively.

1. Chemical context

Compounds bearing a 3-hy­droxy-2-phenyl-chromen-4-one core belong to the family specifically categorized as flavonol derivatives (common name: 3-hy­droxy­flavones). They feature a chromone (1-benzo­pyran-4-one) core, which is a privileged scaffold in medicinal chemistry due to its diverse biological activities (Borsari et al., 2016View full citation). These derivatives, also referred to as 3-hy­droxy­flavones, can scavenge free radicals and chelate metal ions (Roshal, 2024View full citation; Mihajlović et al., 2025View full citation), which is vital in preventing oxidative stress-related diseases.

In 3-hy­droxy­flavone derivatives, a crucial intra­molecular hydrogen bond forms between the 3-hydroxyl group and the 4-oxo (carbonyl, C=O) oxygen. This bond forms a five-membered ring stabilized by a resonance-assisted hydrogen bond and is responsible for excited-state intra­molecular proton transfer (ESIPT) (Zhao et al., 2021View full citation; Pivovarenko, 2023View full citation; Pivovarenko & Klymchenko, 2024View full citation). The mol­ecule absorbs light in its enol form but, after the proton jumps, it emits light as a keto form. This keto form has a much lower energy, shifting the emission to much longer wavelengths. ESIPT features can be tuned by C4′ substitutions making it possible to use 3-hy­droxy­flavones as environment-sensitive fluorescence probes (Pivovarenko, 2023View full citation; Snizhko et al., 2025View full citation; Chepeleva et al., 2023View full citation; Demidov et al., 2022View full citation; Kyrychenko & Ladokhin, 2024View full citation).

The X-ray structures were vital for showing how various electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups, especially at the C6, C7, and C4′ positions, and steric factors affect the planarity of 3-hy­droxy­flavones (Etter et al., 1986View full citation; Shoja et al., 1998View full citation; Shoja & Sullivan, 1999View full citation; Wera et al., 2011aView full citation,bView full citation; Narita et al., 2015View full citation; Koh, 2020View full citation). Recently, we have demonstrated that the nature and position of substituent groups can significantly influence crystal packing in the solid state, thereby tuning the contributions of intra- and inter­molecular hydrogen bonding and the ESIPT behavior (Demidov et al., 2025View full citation). The investigation of the crystal structure of 3-hy­droxy­flavones bearing a C6-electron-donating group on the A ring and a C4′-electron-withdrawing group on the B ring provides insights into the role of electron conjugation and push–pull effects (Pivovarenko & Klymchenko, 2024View full citation; Doroshenko et al., 2019View full citation, 2026View full citation) on the structure, optical properties and supra­molecular inter­actions.

[Scheme 1]

2. Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, 1, is shown in Fig. 1[link]. The asymmetric unit contains one crystallographically independent mol­ecule. The mol­ecule comprises a chromenone fragment bearing hy­droxy and meth­oxy substituents and a benzaldehyde group. The meth­oxy substituent at atom C15 is almost coplanar with the chromenone fragment, as indicated by the C17—O5—C15—C16 torsion angle of 3.4 (3)°.

[Figure 1]
Figure 1
The mol­ecular structure of 1, showing the atom labeling and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.

The benzaldehyde ring is rotated relative to the chromenone fragment. The inter­fragment torsion angle C6—C5—C8—C9 is −12.8 (3)°, indicating a slight twist between the two fragments. This orientation enables an intra­molecular C6—H6⋯O3 hydrogen bond (Table 1[link]) involving a phenyl C—H group and an oxygen atom of the chromenone moiety. The oxygen atom O3, which participates in the intra­molecular C—H⋯O inter­action also participates in the intra­molecular resonant O3—H3⋯O4 hydrogen bond in the chromenone group (Table 1[link]). This hydrogen bond is important as it is responsible for ESIPT in compounds of this type, as mentioned earlier in the Chemical context. Thus, the O3 atom participates in two intra­molecular hydrogen bonds of different types.

Table 1
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O3—H3⋯O1i 0.89 (2) 2.02 (2) 2.8304 (18) 151 (2)
O3—H3⋯O4 0.89 (2) 2.20 (2) 2.6853 (18) 113.6 (19)
C6—H6⋯O3 0.93 2.20 2.834 (2) 12
Symmetry code: (i) Mathematical equation.

3. Supra­molecular features

In the crystal, mol­ecules of 1 are linked by O3—H3⋯O1i hydrogen bonds (Table 1[link], Fig. 2[link]a), forming zigzag chains along [201] (Fig. 2[link]b). The crystal packing is further consolidated by ππ stacking inter­actions between chromenone rings of mol­ecules belonging to adjacent chains [Cg1⋯Cg3(1 − x, 1 − y, 1 − z) = 3.575 (3) Å; Cg1 and Cg3 are the centroids of the O2/C8–C12 and C11 –C16 rings, respectively]. In addition, weak C7—H7⋯C3(x, Mathematical equation − y, −Mathematical equation + z)(π) contacts are observed between mol­ecules from neighboring chains [H⋯C = 2.86 (3) Å, C—H⋯C = 170.4 (2)°], which also contribute to the cohesion of the crystal packing.

[Figure 2]
Figure 2
(a) The hydrogen-bonded chains of 1. (b) The crystal packing of 1. Some hydrogen-bonded chains are highlighted in different colors.

4. Hirshfeld surface analysis and fingerprint plots

The inter­molecular inter­actions were visualized using the CrystalExplorer21 program (Spackman et al., 2021View full citation). The Hirshfeld surface mapped over dnorm (Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009View full citation) is shown in Fig. 3[link]. The strongest contacts, which are visualized on the Hirshfeld surface as the dark-red spots, correspond to the inter­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bond between mol­ecules. Lighter red spots correspond to weaker O⋯H/H⋯O inter­actions, such as C—H⋯O. The majority of the inter­molecular inter­actions of 1 are weak, which results in the blue color of the Hirshfeld surface.

[Figure 3]
Figure 3
Three-dimensional Hirshfeld surface of title compound mapped over dnorm.

For further exploration of the inter­molecular inter­actions, two-dimensional fingerprint plots (McKinnon et al., 2007View full citation) were generated as shown in Fig. 4[link]. The H⋯H and O⋯H/H⋯O inter­actions, with contributions of 34.2% and 27.6%, respectively, have the greatest impact on the crystal packing in the solid state. The C⋯H/H⋯C inter­actions with 20.4%, C⋯O/O⋯C with 9.3%, C⋯C with 7.3% or O⋯O with 1.1% are less impactful in comparison.

[Figure 4]
Figure 4
Two-dimensional fingerprint plots for the title compound showing (a) all inter­actions, and (b)–(g) delineated into contributions from other contacts [de and di represent the distances from a point on the Hirshfeld surface to the nearest atoms outside (external) and inside (inter­nal) the surface, respectively].

5. Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 6.00, updated March 2025; Groom et al., 2016View full citation) found 74 structures containing 3-hydroxyflavone. Of these, we would like to highlight 13 hits that are similar to title compound. These hits include the parent 3-hy­droxy­flavone itself and its derivatives (refcodes DUMFAS, DUMFEW, DUMFIA; Etter et al., 1986View full citation). The C4′-fluoro (WACTUR; Wera et al., 2010View full citation), C4′-hy­droxy (IJUCAS; Wera et al., 2011aView full citation), and C4′-meth­oxy (IKAHIM; Wera et al., 2011bView full citation; IKAHIM01; Demidov et al., 2025View full citation) derivatives have been reported. The C4′-tert-butyl 3-hydroxyflavone has been reported (OHELE; Narita et al., 2015View full citation). Polymorphs of C4′-(di­methyl­amino) and C4′-(di­ethyl­amino) 3-hydroxyflavone has been found (BANJEN, BANJEN01, CEZDOC, CEZDOC; Hino et al., 2011View full citation, 2013View full citation). 3-Hydroxyflavones with C2′-meth­oxy (LIGZIK01,; Shoja & Sullivan, 1999View full citation), C2′,C3-dimeth­oxy (PUWCUI; Koh, 2020View full citation), C3′-benz­oxy (AMEBAZ, AMORUT; Demidov et al., 2025View full citation), and C7-meth­oxy (NUZPUT; Shoja et al., 1998View full citation) groups have been reported.

6. Synthesis and crystallization

The compound was synthesized by a modified procedure reported earlier (Demidov et al., 2025View full citation). All chemicals were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification (Sigma-Aldrich, Enamine Ltd).

Hy­droxy-5-meth­oxy-aceto­phenone (1.66 g, 10 mmol) and terephthalaldehyde diethyl-acetal (2.08 g, 10 mmol) were dissolved in ethanol (40 mL). Potassium hydroxide (3.36 g, 60 mmol) was added to the solution under stirring at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h and conversion was monitored by TLC. After completion of the reaction hydrogen peroxide (30% H2O2, 3.4 mL, 30 mmol) was added dropwise to the reaction mixture, which was then placed in the ultrasound bath at room temperature for 10 minutes. After that the mixture was cooled to 273 K and acidified with 10% hydro­chloric acid to reach a pH of 3 and stirred for additional 10 minutes. The resulting precipitate was filtered off and washed thoroughly with water and hexane. The crude product was recrystallized twice from i-PrOH–DMF (45:1) mixture. Yield 1.35 g (46%), yellow crystalline material, m.p. 472.5–473 K. Elemental analysis calculated for C17H12O5: C, 68.92; H, 4.08. Found: C, 68.78; H, 4.15.

1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance DRX 500 spectrometer at a resonance frequency of 500 and 126 MHz in DMSO-d6. Chemical shifts are reported in the δ scale (ppm). Mass spectra were recorded on an Agilent 1100 high-performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC) equipped with a diode matrix and an Agilent LC/MSD SL mass-selective detector, a SUPELCO Ascentis Express C18 chromatographic column 2.7 µm 4.6 mm x 15 cm.

1H NMR spectrum, δ, ppm: 10.03 (s, 1H), 9.91 (br. s, 1H), 8.36 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.01 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.67 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, 1H), 7.40–7.24 (m, 2H), 3.84 (s, 3H) (see Fig. S1 top).

13C NMR spectrum, δ, ppm: 193.1, 173.2, 156.5, 150.1, 143.7, 140.4, 137.3, 136.6, 129.9, 128.4, 124.4, 122.2, 120.6, 104.3, 56.2 (see Figure S1 bottom).

Mass spectrum, m/z (Irel, %): 297.0 [M + H]+(100) (see Fig. S2).

7. Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2[link]. H atoms were placed in calculated positions and refined by riding model with Uiso(H) = nUeq of the carrier atom (n = 1.5 for methyl groups and n = 1.2 for other hydrogen atoms).

Table 2
Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formula C17H12O5
Mr 296.27
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K) 296
a, b, c (Å) 9.9231 (10), 18.3524 (18), 7.5479 (8)
β (°) 103.118 (3)
V3) 1338.7 (2)
Z 4
Radiation type Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 0.11
Crystal size (mm) 0.3 × 0.2 × 0.1
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Bruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correction Multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015View full citation)
Tmin, Tmax 0.652, 0.746
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 23026, 3062, 2019
Rint 0.063
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.650
 
Refinement
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)], wR(F2), S 0.050, 0.125, 1.04
No. of reflections 3062
No. of parameters 203
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.23, −0.21
Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2014View full citation), SHELXT2018/2 (Sheldrick, 2015aView full citation), SHELXL2019/3 (Sheldrick, 2015bView full citation) and OLEX2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009View full citation).

Supporting information


Computing details top

4-(3-Hydroxy-6-methoxy-4-oxo-4H-chromen-2-yl)benzaldehyde top
Crystal data top
C17H12O5F(000) = 616
Mr = 296.27Dx = 1.470 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 9.9231 (10) ÅCell parameters from 3272 reflections
b = 18.3524 (18) Åθ = 2.2–24.7°
c = 7.5479 (8) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
β = 103.118 (3)°T = 296 K
V = 1338.7 (2) Å3Block, yellow
Z = 40.3 × 0.2 × 0.1 mm
Data collection top
Bruker APEXII CCD
diffractometer
2019 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.063
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.1°
Absorption correction: multi-scan
(SADABS; Krause et al., 2015)
h = 1212
Tmin = 0.652, Tmax = 0.746k = 2323
23026 measured reflectionsl = 99
3062 independent reflections
Refinement top
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: dual
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.125 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0524P)2 + 0.2246P]
where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.04(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
3062 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.23 e Å3
203 parametersΔρmin = 0.21 e Å3
0 restraints
Special details top

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.

Refinement. Using Olex2 (Dolomanov et al., 2009), the structure was solved with the SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2018) structure solution program using Intrinsic Phasing and refined with the SHELXL (Sheldrick, 2015) refinement package. Full-matrix least-squares refinement against F2 in anisotropic approximation was used for non-hydrogen atoms.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2) top
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O11.29775 (13)0.69700 (7)0.9257 (2)0.0517 (4)
O20.64574 (11)0.53802 (6)0.76175 (16)0.0363 (3)
O30.52689 (14)0.70937 (7)0.5462 (2)0.0507 (4)
H30.440 (3)0.7237 (13)0.506 (3)0.076*
O40.28735 (13)0.63680 (7)0.5116 (2)0.0481 (4)
O50.17061 (13)0.38516 (7)0.75935 (19)0.0459 (4)
C11.20045 (19)0.71828 (10)0.8100 (3)0.0397 (5)
H11.2152420.7571030.7375170.048*
C21.06098 (18)0.68715 (9)0.7761 (2)0.0338 (4)
C31.03239 (18)0.62416 (10)0.8636 (3)0.0374 (4)
H3A1.1036900.5992470.9412610.045*
C40.89871 (18)0.59871 (10)0.8353 (2)0.0375 (4)
H40.8808620.5564350.8939530.045*
C50.78883 (17)0.63530 (9)0.7197 (2)0.0327 (4)
C60.81938 (19)0.69798 (10)0.6320 (3)0.0402 (5)
H60.7486510.7231490.5539680.048*
C70.95327 (18)0.72287 (10)0.6599 (3)0.0380 (4)
H70.9718210.7645520.5995090.046*
C80.64731 (17)0.60722 (9)0.6925 (2)0.0331 (4)
C90.52761 (18)0.64075 (9)0.6130 (2)0.0353 (4)
C100.39395 (18)0.60553 (10)0.5922 (2)0.0352 (4)
C110.39709 (17)0.53381 (9)0.6732 (2)0.0312 (4)
C120.52311 (17)0.50293 (10)0.7537 (2)0.0326 (4)
C130.53046 (19)0.43401 (10)0.8322 (2)0.0392 (4)
H130.6157840.4134930.8852350.047*
C140.41102 (19)0.39688 (10)0.8306 (3)0.0404 (5)
H140.4152060.3507970.8827870.048*
C150.28218 (18)0.42748 (10)0.7510 (2)0.0354 (4)
C160.27491 (18)0.49510 (10)0.6721 (2)0.0361 (4)
H160.1894250.5152130.6181000.043*
C170.03785 (19)0.41217 (11)0.6707 (3)0.0479 (5)
H17A0.0354990.4205730.5445480.072*
H17B0.0202410.4570650.7267660.072*
H17C0.0316850.3770890.6812160.072*
Atomic displacement parameters (Å2) top
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0366 (8)0.0462 (9)0.0653 (10)0.0042 (6)0.0031 (7)0.0009 (7)
O20.0305 (7)0.0323 (7)0.0453 (8)0.0010 (5)0.0071 (5)0.0060 (6)
O30.0325 (7)0.0322 (8)0.0835 (11)0.0029 (6)0.0051 (7)0.0152 (7)
O40.0315 (7)0.0401 (8)0.0685 (10)0.0041 (6)0.0027 (6)0.0121 (7)
O50.0385 (8)0.0413 (8)0.0565 (9)0.0074 (6)0.0077 (6)0.0086 (6)
C10.0383 (10)0.0371 (11)0.0443 (12)0.0015 (8)0.0103 (8)0.0043 (8)
C20.0337 (10)0.0303 (10)0.0380 (10)0.0001 (8)0.0097 (7)0.0062 (8)
C30.0322 (10)0.0352 (10)0.0418 (11)0.0037 (8)0.0024 (8)0.0009 (8)
C40.0376 (10)0.0316 (10)0.0430 (11)0.0017 (8)0.0087 (8)0.0025 (8)
C50.0305 (9)0.0316 (10)0.0359 (10)0.0038 (7)0.0073 (7)0.0033 (7)
C60.0339 (10)0.0374 (11)0.0486 (12)0.0040 (8)0.0081 (8)0.0085 (9)
C70.0370 (10)0.0331 (10)0.0443 (11)0.0001 (8)0.0105 (8)0.0046 (8)
C80.0335 (10)0.0289 (10)0.0372 (10)0.0016 (7)0.0087 (7)0.0007 (7)
C90.0354 (10)0.0270 (10)0.0431 (11)0.0010 (8)0.0082 (8)0.0018 (8)
C100.0310 (10)0.0341 (10)0.0399 (11)0.0024 (8)0.0066 (8)0.0005 (8)
C110.0307 (9)0.0294 (9)0.0338 (10)0.0011 (7)0.0081 (7)0.0009 (7)
C120.0323 (9)0.0313 (10)0.0342 (10)0.0004 (7)0.0075 (7)0.0009 (7)
C130.0379 (10)0.0360 (11)0.0415 (11)0.0049 (8)0.0044 (8)0.0062 (8)
C140.0436 (11)0.0333 (10)0.0427 (11)0.0001 (8)0.0066 (8)0.0068 (8)
C150.0372 (10)0.0345 (10)0.0352 (10)0.0051 (8)0.0096 (8)0.0023 (8)
C160.0329 (10)0.0352 (10)0.0398 (11)0.0012 (8)0.0071 (7)0.0003 (8)
C170.0358 (11)0.0466 (12)0.0604 (14)0.0061 (9)0.0093 (9)0.0029 (10)
Geometric parameters (Å, º) top
O1—C11.210 (2)C6—H60.9300
O2—C81.375 (2)C6—C71.375 (2)
O2—C121.366 (2)C7—H70.9300
O3—H30.89 (2)C8—C91.351 (2)
O3—C91.356 (2)C9—C101.451 (2)
O4—C101.2354 (19)C10—C111.449 (2)
O5—C151.366 (2)C11—C121.382 (2)
O5—C171.424 (2)C11—C161.404 (2)
C1—H10.9300C12—C131.392 (2)
C1—C21.465 (2)C13—H130.9300
C2—C31.392 (2)C13—C141.365 (2)
C2—C71.384 (2)C14—H140.9300
C3—H3A0.9300C14—C151.401 (2)
C3—C41.377 (2)C15—C161.371 (3)
C4—H40.9300C16—H160.9300
C4—C51.403 (2)C17—H17A0.9600
C5—C61.395 (3)C17—H17B0.9600
C5—C81.466 (2)C17—H17C0.9600
C12—O2—C8120.37 (13)C8—C9—C10122.34 (16)
C9—O3—H3108.8 (16)O4—C10—C9120.39 (16)
C15—O5—C17116.97 (14)O4—C10—C11124.31 (16)
O1—C1—H1117.7C11—C10—C9115.29 (15)
O1—C1—C2124.56 (18)C12—C11—C10119.27 (15)
C2—C1—H1117.7C12—C11—C16119.29 (16)
C3—C2—C1121.82 (17)C16—C11—C10121.44 (15)
C7—C2—C1119.26 (17)O2—C12—C11122.29 (15)
C7—C2—C3118.86 (16)O2—C12—C13116.72 (15)
C2—C3—H3A120.0C11—C12—C13120.99 (16)
C4—C3—C2120.07 (17)C12—C13—H13120.4
C4—C3—H3A120.0C14—C13—C12119.23 (17)
C3—C4—H4119.3C14—C13—H13120.4
C3—C4—C5121.30 (17)C13—C14—H14119.7
C5—C4—H4119.3C13—C14—C15120.67 (17)
C4—C5—C8120.21 (16)C15—C14—H14119.7
C6—C5—C4117.91 (16)O5—C15—C14115.02 (16)
C6—C5—C8121.88 (16)O5—C15—C16124.85 (16)
C5—C6—H6119.7C16—C15—C14120.13 (17)
C7—C6—C5120.51 (17)C11—C16—H16120.2
C7—C6—H6119.7C15—C16—C11119.69 (17)
C2—C7—H7119.3C15—C16—H16120.2
C6—C7—C2121.33 (17)O5—C17—H17A109.5
C6—C7—H7119.3O5—C17—H17B109.5
O2—C8—C5111.39 (14)O5—C17—H17C109.5
C9—C8—O2120.31 (15)H17A—C17—H17B109.5
C9—C8—C5128.29 (16)H17A—C17—H17C109.5
O3—C9—C10116.47 (15)H17B—C17—H17C109.5
C8—C9—O3121.19 (16)
O1—C1—C2—C37.2 (3)C7—C2—C3—C40.6 (3)
O1—C1—C2—C7170.05 (18)C8—O2—C12—C111.6 (2)
O2—C8—C9—O3179.08 (16)C8—O2—C12—C13177.93 (16)
O2—C8—C9—C101.7 (3)C8—C5—C6—C7179.85 (17)
O2—C12—C13—C14179.03 (16)C8—C9—C10—O4176.81 (18)
O3—C9—C10—O42.4 (3)C8—C9—C10—C113.9 (3)
O3—C9—C10—C11176.89 (16)C9—C10—C11—C123.3 (2)
O4—C10—C11—C12177.41 (18)C9—C10—C11—C16176.49 (16)
O4—C10—C11—C162.8 (3)C10—C11—C12—O20.7 (3)
O5—C15—C16—C11179.50 (15)C10—C11—C12—C13179.71 (17)
C1—C2—C3—C4176.63 (16)C10—C11—C16—C15179.66 (17)
C1—C2—C7—C6176.28 (17)C11—C12—C13—C140.5 (3)
C2—C3—C4—C50.3 (3)C12—O2—C8—C5178.44 (14)
C3—C2—C7—C61.0 (3)C12—O2—C8—C91.1 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C60.8 (3)C12—C11—C16—C150.1 (3)
C3—C4—C5—C8179.71 (16)C12—C13—C14—C150.0 (3)
C4—C5—C6—C70.4 (3)C13—C14—C15—O5179.54 (16)
C4—C5—C8—O211.8 (2)C13—C14—C15—C160.6 (3)
C4—C5—C8—C9167.75 (18)C14—C15—C16—C110.7 (3)
C5—C6—C7—C20.5 (3)C16—C11—C12—O2179.07 (15)
C5—C8—C9—O30.4 (3)C16—C11—C12—C130.5 (3)
C5—C8—C9—C10178.76 (16)C17—O5—C15—C14176.38 (16)
C6—C5—C8—O2167.64 (16)C17—O5—C15—C163.4 (3)
C6—C5—C8—C912.8 (3)
Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, º) top
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H3···O1i0.89 (2)2.02 (2)2.8304 (18)151 (2)
O3—H3···O40.89 (2)2.20 (2)2.6853 (18)113.6 (19)
C6—H6···O30.932.202.834 (2)12
Symmetry code: (i) x1, y+3/2, z1/2.
 

References

Return to citationBorsari, C., Luciani, R., Pozzi, C., Poehner, I., Henrich, S., Trande, M., Cordeiro-da-Silva, A., Santarem, N., Baptista, C., Tait, A., Di Pisa, F., Dello Iacono, L., Landi, G., Gul, S., Wolf, M., Kuzikov, M., Ellinger, B., Reinshagen, J., Witt, G., Gribbon, P., Kohler, M., Keminer, O., Behrens, B., Costantino, L., Tejera Nevado, P., Bifeld, E., Eick, J., Clos, J., Torrado, J., Jiménez-Antón, M. D., Corral, M. J., Alunda, J. M., Pellati, F., Wade, R. C., Ferrari, S., Mangani, S. & Costi, M. P. (2016). J. Med. Chem. 59, 7598–7616.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationBruker (2014). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.  Google Scholar
Return to citationChepeleva, L. V., Demidov, O. O., Snizhko, A. D., Tarasenko, D. O., Chumak, A. Y., Kolomoitsev, O. O., Kotliar, V. M., Gladkov, E. S., Kyrychenko, A. & Roshal, A. D. (2023). RSC Adv. 13, 34107–34121.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationDemidov, O. O., Chepeleva, L. V., Shishkina, S. V., Gladkov, E. S., Kyrychenko, A., Linnik, R. P. & Roshal, A. D. (2025). RSC Adv. 15, 36300–36318.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationDemidov, O. O., Gladkov, E. S., Kyrychenko, A. V. & Roshal, A. D. (2022). Funct. Mater 29, 252–262.  CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationDolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationDoroshenko, A. O., Chumak, A. Y., Kolomoitsev, O. O. & Kotlyar, V. M. (2026). J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 472, 116817.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationDoroshenko, A. O., Kyrychenko, A. V., Valyashko, O. M., Kotlyar, V. N. & Svechkarev, D. A. (2019). J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 383, 111964.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationEtter, M. C., Urbańczyk-Lipkowska, Z., Baer, S. & Barbara, P. F. (1986). J. Mol. Struct. 144, 155–167.  CSD CrossRef CAS Web of Science Google Scholar
Return to citationGroom, C. R., Bruno, I. J., Lightfoot, M. P. & Ward, S. C. (2016). Acta Cryst. B72, 171–179.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationHino, K., Nakajima, K., Kawahara, M., Furukawa, K. & Sekiya, H. (2013). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn 86, 721–723.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationHino, K., Nakajima, K., Kawahara, M., Kiyota, I. & Sekiya, H. (2011). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn 84, 1234–1236.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKoh, D. (2020). Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 235, 913–914.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationKrause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationKyrychenko, A. & Ladokhin, A. S. (2024). Chem. Rec. 24, e202300232.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationMcKinnon, J. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2007). Chem. Commun. pp. 3814–3816.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationMihajlović, L., Trif, M. & Živković, M. B. (2025). Inorganics 13, 250.  Google Scholar
Return to citationNarita, F., Takura, A. & Fujihara, T. (2015). Acta Cryst. E71, 824–826.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationPivovarenko, V. G. (2023). BBA Adv. 3, 100094.  Google Scholar
Return to citationPivovarenko, V. G. & Klymchenko, A. S. (2024). Chem. Rec. 24, e202300321.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationRoshal, A. D. (2024). Chem. Rec. 24, e202300249.  Web of Science CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationSheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8.  Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationShoja, M. & Sullivan, P. (1999). Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 214, 237–238.  CSD CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationShoja, M., Sullivan, P., Athanasopoulos, D. & Kabbani, R. (1998). Z. Kristallogr. New Cryst. Struct. 213, 607-608.  CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationSnizhko, A. D., Chepeleva, L. V., Gladkov, E. S. & Kyrychenko, A. (2025). J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 469, 116524.  Web of Science CrossRef Google Scholar
Return to citationSpackman, M. A. & Jayatilaka, D. (2009). CrystEngComm 11, 19–32.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS Google Scholar
Return to citationSpackman, P. R., Turner, M. J., McKinnon, J. J., Wolff, S. K., Grimwood, D. J., Jayatilaka, D. & Spackman, M. A. (2021). J. Appl. Cryst. 54, 1006–1011.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationWera, M., Pivovarenko, V. G. & Błażejowski, J. (2011a). Acta Cryst. E67, o264–o265.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationWera, M., Serdiuk, I. E., Roshal, A. D. & Błażejowski, J. (2010). Acta Cryst. E66, o3122.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationWera, M., Serdiuk, I. E., Roshal, A. D. & Błażejowski, J. (2011b). Acta Cryst. E67, o440.  Web of Science CSD CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Return to citationZhao, X., Li, X., Liang, S., Dong, X. & Zhang, Z. (2021). RSC Adv. 11, 28851–28862.  Web of Science CrossRef CAS PubMed Google Scholar

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

Journal logoCRYSTALLOGRAPHIC
COMMUNICATIONS
ISSN: 2056-9890
Follow Acta Cryst. E
Sign up for e-alerts
Follow Acta Cryst. on Twitter
Follow us on facebook
Sign up for RSS feeds