research communications
A new hexagonal polymorph of magnesium perchlorate hexahydrate obtained from an acetamide medium
aInstitute of Mineralogy and Crystallography, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Akad. G. Bonchev Str., Bl. 107, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
*Correspondence e-mail: [email protected]
A new magnesium perchlorate hexahydrate phase, Mg(ClO4)2·6H2O, was obtained from the mixed solvents of water and acetamide. The structure crystallizes in the hexagonal space group P63mc and is isostructural with previously reported M(ClO4)2·6H2O (M = Zn, Ni, Fe) phases. The Mg site is half occupied, indicating positional disorder of the metal cation. Prolonged crystallization leads to the formation of larger crystals consistent with an expanded suggesting the formation of a disorder-related The Mg, Cl and one of the O atoms have 3m. site symmetry.
CCDC reference: 2489227
1. Chemical context
Magnesium perchlorate, Mg(ClO4)2, forms several hydrated crystalline phases, including the dihydrate, tetrahydrate and hexahydrate, which exhibit structural variability depending on crystallization conditions. Early studies described the hexahydrate as orthorhombic, while later investigations revealed additional structural complexity and possible disorder effects. Previously reported crystal structures of magnesium perchlorate hydrates include orthorhombic and monoclinic phases (West, 1934
; Robertson & Bish, 2010
; Solovyov, 2012
).
Compounds of the general type M(ClO4)2·6H2O (M = Zn, Ni, Fe) have been reported to adopt closely related structures characterized by metal-site disorder and partial occupancies (Ghosh & Ray, 1976
; Ghosh et al., 1997
). These studies demonstrate that the disorder of the metal position is an intrinsic feature of this structural family and plays a key role in determining symmetry and phase behavior.
The present structure therefore represents a hexagonal polymorph of magnesium perchlorate hexahydrate, distinct from previously reported orthorhombic and monoclinic forms. The compound was obtained from an acetamide-containing medium, indicating that the crystallization environment plays a significant role in directing phase formation in the Mg–ClO4–H2O system.
2. Structural commentary
The title compound, Mg(ClO4)2·6H2O, crystallizes in the hexagonal space group P63mc with a = b = 7.7942 (3) Å and c = 5.2703 (3) Å. The Mg2+ cation (site symmetry 3m.) is coordinated by six water molecules, forming a slightly distorted octahedral [Mg(H2O)6]2+ environment (Fig. 1
). The six Mg—O distances are identical by symmetry at 2.126 (5), while the perchlorate anions retain their usual tetrahedral geometry with Cl—O distances of 1.426 (5) and 1.428 (3) Å.
| Figure 1 Arrangement of Mg(H2O)6 octahedra and ClO4 tetrahedra in Mg(ClO4)2·6H2O viewed along [100]. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines. |
The magnesium octahedra are connected through shared faces [Mg1⋯Mg1 = 2.63515 (15) Å], forming infinite chains extending along the [001] direction with Mg1—O1—Mg1 = 76.57 (9)°. The half-occupancy of the Mg site implies the presence of disordered interruptions within these chains, resulting in vacant positions along the columns. When this interruption becomes ordered, a lowering of symmetry occurs, leading to orthorhombic structures (Ghosh et al., 1997
). In contrast, when the disorder is maintained, the structure retains higher symmetry in the hexagonal space group. This behavior is consistent with previously reported Zn and Ni perchlorate hexahydrate structures (Ghosh & Ray, 1976
), where similar disorder-driven symmetry relationships have been observed.
The perchlorate anions (Cl site symmetry 3m.) occupy interstitial positions and consolidate the structure through electrostatic interactions. During crystallization, large needle-shaped crystals were observed, corresponding to an expanded unit cell of approximately 15 × 15 × 5 Å. This suggests the formation of a superstructure related to partial disorder or long-range ordering effects.
3. Supramolecular features
The structure is consolidated by O1—H1⋯O3i [symmetry code: (i) 1 − x + y, 1 − x, z) hydrogen bonds involving the coordinated water molecule [H⋯O = 2.20 Å, O⋯O = 3.041 (4) Å, O—H⋯O = 155°], which link the coordination octahedra into a three-dimensional network. The arrangement of the octahedral chains and hydrogen-bond network viewed along the [001] direction is shown in Fig. 2
.
| Figure 2 Packing of the crystal structure of Mg(ClO4)2·6H2O viewed along [001], illustrating the hydrogen-bonded framework and disordered octahedral chains. |
4. Database survey
Previously reported crystal structures of magnesium perchlorate hydrates include orthorhombic and monoclinic polymorphs (West, 1934
; Robertson & Bish, 2010
; Solovyov, 2012
). Related disordered perchlorate hexahydrates containing divalent metal cations such as Zn, Ni and Fe have also been described (Ghosh & Ray, 1976
; Ghosh et al., 1997
). These compounds exhibit similar disorder-related structural features, including partial occupancies of the metal positions and disorder-driven symmetry relationships between hexagonal and orthorhombic forms.
5. Synthesis and crystallization
The compound was obtained in the system Mg(ClO4)2:m(acetamide):n(H2O) by solution crystallization followed by slow evaporation at room temperature. The mixture forms a viscous liquid phase.
Crystallization occurs over approximately two days, yielding large needle-like crystals suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction at early stages. Continued crystallization leads to deterioration in crystal quality and increased structural disorder.
6. Refinement
Crystal data, data collection and structure details are summarized in Table 1
. The model indicates the presence of disorder, as reflected in elevated displacement parameters and features identified in the checkCIF analysis. The hydrogen atom of the coordinated water molecules was included in a calculated position and refined using a riding model.
|
Supporting information
CCDC reference: 2489227
contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989026004871/hb8208sup1.cif
Structure factors: contains datablock I. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S2056989026004871/hb8208Isup2.hkl
| Mg(ClO4)2·6H2O | Dx = 1.984 Mg m−3 |
| Mr = 165.65 | Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å |
| Hexagonal, P63mc | Cell parameters from 4768 reflections |
| a = 7.7942 (3) Å | θ = 3.0–25.9° |
| c = 5.2703 (3) Å | µ = 0.72 mm−1 |
| V = 277.27 (3) Å3 | T = 273 K |
| Z = 2 | Block, clear white |
| F(000) = 170 | 0.2 × 0.1 × 0.1 mm |
| Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer | 229 reflections with I > 2σ(I) |
| Radiation source: sealed tube | Rint = 0.038 |
| φ and ω scans | θmax = 26.4°, θmin = 3.0° |
| Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Krause et al., 2015) | h = −9→9 |
| Tmin = 0.870, Tmax = 0.932 | k = −9→9 |
| 7335 measured reflections | l = −6→6 |
| 234 independent reflections |
| Refinement on F2 | Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map |
| Least-squares matrix: full | Hydrogen site location: difference Fourier map |
| R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.024 | H-atom parameters constrained |
| wR(F2) = 0.065 | w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0391P)2 + 0.061P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3 |
| S = 1.20 | (Δ/σ)max < 0.001 |
| 234 reflections | Δρmax = 0.15 e Å−3 |
| 22 parameters | Δρmin = −0.20 e Å−3 |
| 1 restraint | Absolute structure: Flack x determined using 98 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013) |
| Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods | Absolute structure parameter: 0.04 (3) |
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes. |
| x | y | z | Uiso*/Ueq | Occ. (<1) | |
| Mg1 | 0.000000 | 0.000000 | 0.2498 (12) | 0.0239 (7) | 0.5 |
| O1 | 0.12365 (19) | −0.12365 (19) | 0.5000 (9) | 0.0467 (7) | |
| H1 | 0.255441 | −0.078800 | 0.499143 | 0.070* | |
| Cl1 | 0.666667 | 0.333333 | 0.49460 (13) | 0.0291 (4) | |
| O2 | 0.666667 | 0.333333 | 0.2241 (10) | 0.0576 (17) | |
| O3 | 0.8658 (5) | 0.4329 (2) | 0.5864 (8) | 0.0579 (10) |
| U11 | U22 | U33 | U12 | U13 | U23 | |
| Mg1 | 0.0220 (9) | 0.0220 (9) | 0.0277 (12) | 0.0110 (4) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| O1 | 0.0418 (10) | 0.0418 (10) | 0.0639 (14) | 0.0264 (11) | 0.0007 (9) | −0.0007 (9) |
| Cl1 | 0.0237 (5) | 0.0237 (5) | 0.0400 (6) | 0.0118 (2) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| O2 | 0.067 (3) | 0.067 (3) | 0.040 (3) | 0.0333 (13) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| O3 | 0.0294 (16) | 0.0534 (15) | 0.083 (2) | 0.0147 (8) | −0.0159 (15) | −0.0079 (8) |
| Mg1—Mg1i | 2.6352 (1) | Mg1—O1vi | 2.126 (5) |
| Mg1—Mg1ii | 2.6351 (1) | O1—H1 | 0.9046 |
| Mg1—O1i | 2.126 (5) | O1—H1vii | 0.9046 |
| Mg1—O1 | 2.127 (5) | Cl1—O2 | 1.426 (5) |
| Mg1—O1iii | 2.127 (5) | Cl1—O3 | 1.428 (3) |
| Mg1—O1iv | 2.126 (5) | Cl1—O3viii | 1.428 (3) |
| Mg1—O1v | 2.127 (5) | Cl1—O3ix | 1.428 (3) |
| O1i—Mg1—O1v | 94.35 (6) | O1iv—Mg1—O1iii | 94.35 (6) |
| O1vi—Mg1—O1iii | 94.35 (6) | Mg1ii—O1—Mg1 | 76.57 (9) |
| O1vi—Mg1—O1i | 85.7 (2) | Mg1ii—O1—H1vii | 120.83 (7) |
| O1i—Mg1—O1 | 94.35 (6) | Mg1ii—O1—H1 | 120.8 |
| O1iv—Mg1—O1 | 94.35 (6) | Mg1—O1—H1vii | 120.39 (7) |
| O1vi—Mg1—O1v | 94.35 (6) | Mg1—O1—H1 | 120.4 |
| O1iv—Mg1—O1i | 85.7 (2) | H1—O1—H1vii | 99.1 |
| O1—Mg1—O1v | 85.6 (2) | O2—Cl1—O3viii | 109.79 (19) |
| O1i—Mg1—O1iii | 179.9 (3) | O2—Cl1—O3 | 109.79 (19) |
| O1iv—Mg1—O1v | 179.9 (3) | O2—Cl1—O3ix | 109.79 (19) |
| O1vi—Mg1—O1 | 179.9 (3) | O3—Cl1—O3viii | 109.15 (19) |
| O1iv—Mg1—O1vi | 85.7 (2) | O3ix—Cl1—O3 | 109.15 (19) |
| O1v—Mg1—O1iii | 85.6 (2) | O3ix—Cl1—O3viii | 109.15 (19) |
| O1—Mg1—O1iii | 85.6 (2) |
| Symmetry codes: (i) x−y, x, z−1/2; (ii) x−y, x, z+1/2; (iii) −x+y, −x, z; (iv) y, −x+y, z−1/2; (v) −y, x−y, z; (vi) −x, −y, z−1/2; (vii) −y, −x, z; (viii) −x+y+1, −x+1, z; (ix) −y+1, x−y, z. |
Funding information
The authors acknowledge financial support from the National Science Fund of Bulgaria (Contract No: K-06-H64/4).
References
Bruker (2016). APEX2 and SAINT. Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Google Scholar
Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. (2009). J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341. Web of Science CrossRef CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Ghosh, M. & Ray, S. (1976). Z. Kristallogr. 145, 146–154. CrossRef Google Scholar
Ghosh, S., Mukherjee, M., Seal, A. & Ray, S. (1997). Acta Cryst. B53, 639–644. CrossRef CAS Web of Science IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Krause, L., Herbst-Irmer, R., Sheldrick, G. M. & Stalke, D. (2015). J. Appl. Cryst. 48, 3–10. Web of Science CSD CrossRef ICSD CAS IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Robertson, K. & Bish, D. (2010). Acta Cryst. B66, 579–584. Web of Science CrossRef ICSD IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015a). Acta Cryst. A71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Sheldrick, G. M. (2015b). Acta Cryst. C71, 3–8. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
Solovyov, L. A. (2012). Acta Cryst. B68, 89–90. Web of Science CrossRef IUCr Journals Google Scholar
West, C. D. (1934). Z. Kristallogr. 91, 480–493. CrossRef Google Scholar
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.

journal menu
access



